overview: factors in the success and failure of microbial insecticides

1
Integrated Pest Management Reviews 4: 279, 1999. © 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. Overview: Factors in the success and failure of microbial insecticides W.D. Gelernter 1,* & H.F. Evans 2 1 PACE Consulting, 1267 Diamond St., San Diego, CA 92109, USA; 2 Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge, Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey, UK; * Author for correspondence (Tel.: +619-272-9897; Fax: +619-483-6349; E-mail: [email protected]) Received 2 February 1999; accepted 31 May 1999 Microbial insecticides based on insect pathogenic viruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and nematodes are an important component in biological control efforts for insect pests of agriculture, forestry and human health. Yet in the past few years, we have seen changes in agriculture, biology and industry that have challenged the way we think about the role of microbial insecti- cides. These changes include the disappearance and/or consolidation of many of the small companies that have traditionally produced microbial insecticides. At the same time, large agrichemical companies are play- ing an increasing role in territory that was previously reserved for the biological control advocate – that is, in the development of safer insecticides. These new products include chemistries (imidacloprid, spinosyn, fipronil and others) that are much safer than the conven- tional broad-spectrum products of the past, as well as transgenic cotton, corn and potatoes that express pro- teins derived from Bacillus thuringiensis. These geneti- cally engineered seed products are enjoying incredibly rapid adoption, with almost 50 million acres planted globally in 1998 and over 1 billion dollars (U.S.) in sales. In contrast, all microbial insecticides combined generate annual sales of approximately $140 million (U.S.) (sales data from privately sponsored marketing reports). In other words, microbial insecticides are now faced with new and formidable competition that threat- ens the small, but significant inroads that have been made over the past several years. What do these changes mean for researchers in microbial control and integrated pest management? To create a forum for discussion of this question, we organised a symposium entitled Factors in the Success and Failure of Microbial Insecticides, which was con- vened at The 8th International Colloquium on Inverte- brate Pathology and Microbial Control. This meeting was sponsored by the Society for Invertebrate Pathol- ogy and was held in Sapporo, Japan in August, 1998. The papers included in this volume come from insect pathologists that work with foliar feeding, soil dwelling and migratory insect pests of forestry, human health, vegetable and field crops, and turfgrass. Each author has applied their expertise to answer the following questions: Does microbial control still have a place in insect management? Which factors characterize the most successful (and the least successful) microbial control programmes? Are there features in common among successful and failed projects? It is our hope that this type of forum can provide guidance in the planning of future microbial control research and implementation programmes, as well as a better understanding of where our efforts have led us today.

Upload: wd-gelernter

Post on 02-Aug-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Overview: Factors in the Success and Failure of Microbial Insecticides

Integrated Pest Management Reviews4: 279, 1999.© 2000Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands.

Overview: Factors in the success and failure of microbial insecticides

W.D. Gelernter1,∗ & H.F. Evans21PACE Consulting, 1267 Diamond St., San Diego, CA 92109, USA;2Forest Research, Alice Holt Lodge,Wrecclesham, Farnham, Surrey, UK;∗Author for correspondence (Tel.:+619-272-9897; Fax:+619-483-6349;E-mail: [email protected])

Received 2 February 1999; accepted 31 May 1999

Microbial insecticides based on insect pathogenicviruses, bacteria, fungi, protozoa and nematodes are animportant component in biological control efforts forinsect pests of agriculture, forestry and human health.Yet in the past few years, we have seen changes inagriculture, biology and industry that have challengedthe way we think about the role of microbial insecti-cides. These changes include the disappearance and/orconsolidation of many of the small companies thathave traditionally produced microbial insecticides. Atthe same time, large agrichemical companies are play-ing an increasing role in territory that was previouslyreserved for the biological control advocate – that is,in the development of safer insecticides. These newproducts include chemistries (imidacloprid, spinosyn,fipronil and others) that are much safer than the conven-tional broad-spectrum products of the past, as well astransgenic cotton, corn and potatoes that express pro-teins derived fromBacillus thuringiensis. These geneti-cally engineered seed products are enjoying incrediblyrapid adoption, with almost 50 million acres plantedglobally in 1998 and over 1 billion dollars (U.S.) insales. In contrast, all microbial insecticides combinedgenerate annual sales of approximately $140 million(U.S.) (sales data from privately sponsored marketingreports). In other words, microbial insecticides are nowfaced with new and formidable competition that threat-ens the small, but significant inroads that have beenmade over the past several years.

What do these changes mean for researchers inmicrobial control and integrated pest management?To create a forum for discussion of this question, weorganised a symposium entitledFactors in the Successand Failure of Microbial Insecticides, which was con-vened at The 8th International Colloquium on Inverte-brate Pathology and Microbial Control. This meetingwas sponsored by the Society for Invertebrate Pathol-ogy and was held in Sapporo, Japan in August, 1998.The papers included in this volume come from insectpathologists that work with foliar feeding, soil dwellingand migratory insect pests of forestry, human health,vegetable and field crops, and turfgrass. Each authorhas applied their expertise to answer the followingquestions:

• Does microbial control still have a place in insectmanagement?• Which factors characterize the most successful (and

the least successful) microbial control programmes?• Are there features in common among successful and

failed projects?

It is our hope that this type of forum can provideguidance in the planning of future microbial controlresearch and implementation programmes, as well asa better understanding of where our efforts have led ustoday.