overview of the protein quality assessment of quinoa (chenopodium quinoa · 2021. 4. 16. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
Overview of the Protein Quality Assessment of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) Matthew G. Nosworthy & James D. House Department of Food and Human Nutritional Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2, Canada. [email protected]; [email protected]
1
Outline
• What is Quinoa ?
• Why is protein important?
• Protein quality assessment
• PER, PDCAAS
• Comparisons of protein quality
• Where does quinoa fall?
• Enhancing quality
• Moving forward
2
Quinoa
• Pseuodocereal- non-grass used in similar way to cereals
• Cultivated over 5000 years ago
• Broad genetic diversity
• Adaptable to different environments (frost, high salinity, etc)
• Reported by NASA (1993) to be a great food to take into space
• Finally made it there in 2015 (Astronaut Samantha Cristoforetti)
• UN General Assembly named 2013 the international year of quinoa
3
Demand for Quinoa
• Commercially available products? 4
http://blogs.worldbank.org/trade/quinoa-the-little-cereal-that-could
Quinoa Products
5
Nutrient composition of quinoa
6
Navrux-Varli & Sanlier (2016). J. Cereal Sci. 69:371-376
Consumer Activity
7
http://www.new-nutrition.com
2016 Food and Health Survey. Food Insight, May 11, 2016. International Food Information Council
Quality vs Quantity
8
• Nitrogen Content • Protein Content
• Amino Acid Composition • Amino Acid Bioavailability
• Digestibility/absorption
Protein Efficiency Ratio (PER)
•Measurement of growth
•Measure
• Diet Intake
• Weight gain
•𝑃𝐸𝑅 =𝑤𝑒𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑡 𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛 (𝑔)
𝑝𝑟𝑜𝑡𝑒𝑖𝑛 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑒 (𝑔)
• Adjusted PER= 𝑃𝐸𝑅 𝑖𝑛𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑒𝑛𝑡
𝑃𝐸𝑅 𝑐𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑖𝑛∗ 2.5
9
Protein Quality: Protein Efficiency Ratio
10
Food Item Adjusted PER
Black Beans b 1.61
Chicken a 2.7
Chickpeas b 2.32
Eggs a 3.1
Milk a 2.5
Oatmeal a 1.8
Quinoa (boiled)d 2.5
Quinoa (Dehulled Flour) c 2.7
Quinoa (flour)d 2
Red Kidney Beans b 1.55
Split Yellow Peas b 1.42
White bread a 1
White Rice a 1.5
Whole Green Lentils b 1.3
aMarinangeli and House. 2017. Nutrients, 75:658-667. bNosworthy et al. 2017. Food. Sci. Nutr. 5:896-903. cRanhotra et al. 1993. Cereal Chem. 70:303-305. dMahoney et al. 1975. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 23:190-193
E
gg
s
a
C
hic
ke
n
a
Q
uin
oa
(
D
eh
ulle
d F
lo
ur
)
c
Q
uin
oa
(
bo
ile
d)
d
M
ilk
a
C
hic
kp
ea
s
b
Q
uin
oa
(
flo
ur
)
d
O
at
m
ea
l
a
B
la
ck
B
ea
ns
b
W
hit
e R
ic
e
a
R
ed
K
id
ne
y B
ea
ns
b
S
plit
Y
ello
w
P
ea
s
b
W
ho
le
G
re
en
L
en
tils
b
W
hit
e b
re
ad
a
0
1
2
3
4
Ad
ju
st
ed
PE
R
Protein Digestibility-Corrected Amino Acid Score (PDCAAS)
• Proposed by FAO/WHO in 1991 • Adopted by USA in 1993
• Amino Acid Score (AAS)
o AA in food/AA in reference pattern o mg/g protein
o Reference pattern of 2-5 yr old school children (1991)
• True Fecal Protein Digestibility (TFPD) o Fecal N output/Dietary N input
o Corrected for endogenous losses
• Additive • Can use existing PDCAAS data to predict new values
11
Reference Values (mg/g protein)
PDCAAS (1991)
THR 34
VAL 35
MET+CYS 25
ILE 28
LEU 66
PHE+TYR 63
HIS 19
LYS 58
TRP 11
In vivo vs in vitro analysis
• Desire to reduce animal experimentation
• Protein alone requires animal experimentation • PER/PDCAAS - rats
• Increasing evidence supporting in vitro protein quality (PDCAAS)
• R2= 0.97841, 0.98982, 0.94423, 0.89914
12 1) Plank, D. Medallion Labs; 2) Nosworthy & House (2017) Cereal Chem., 94, 1-8; 3) Tavano et al. (2016) FRI, 89, 756-763; 4) Nosworthy et al. Unpublished
PDCAAS
In v
itro
PD
CA
AS
R2=0.8991 Ref 4
Protein Quality: PDCAAS
13
Food Item PDCAAS Black Beans b 0.53 Chicken a 1 Chickpeas b 0.52 Eggs a 1 Milk a 1 Oatmeal a 0.82 Quinoa (boiled) d 0.72 Quinoa (flour) d 0.64 Quinoa (washed) c 0.90 Quinoa (raw) c 0.81 Red Kidney Beans b 0.55 Split Yellow Peas b 0.64 White Rice a 0.56 Whole Green Lentils b 0.63
aMarinangeli and House. 2017. Nutrients, 75:658-667. bNosworthy et al. 2017. Food. Sci. Nutr. 5:896-903. cRuales and Nair. 1992. Plant Foods for Hum. Nutr. 42:1-11. dMahoney et al. 1975. J. Agr. Food. Chem. 23:190-193
E
gg
s
a
C
hic
ke
n
a
M
ilk
a
Q
uin
oa
(
w
as
he
d)
c
O
at
m
ea
l
a
Q
uin
oa
(
ra
w
)
c
Q
uin
oa
(
bo
ile
d)
d
Q
uin
oa
(
flo
ur
)
d
S
plit
Y
ello
w
P
ea
s
b
W
ho
le
G
re
en
L
en
tils
b
W
hit
e R
ic
e
a
R
ed
K
id
ne
y B
ea
ns
b
B
la
ck
B
ea
ns
b
C
hic
kp
ea
s
b
0 . 0
0 . 5
1 . 0
PD
CA
AS
PDCAAS is Additive
14 Blending Chickpea and Barley Flour
Nosworthy and House. 2017. Cereal Chem. 94:49-57
PDCAAS is Additive
15
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
% Q u in o a F lo u r
PD
CA
AS
va
lue
Blend of cooked quinoa with cooked yellow spit peas
PDCAAS is Additive
16
THR VAL M+C ILE LEU P+T HIS LYS TRP Protein
Digestibility Quinoa 40 59 49 52 77 62 21 57 19 92 Yellow Split Pea 33 37 21 36 68 77 19 66 9 88
Quinoa
Yellow Split Pea THR VAL M+C ILE LEU P+T HIS LYS TRP
Protein Digestibility
1 0 40 59 49 52 77 62 21 57 19 92
0.9 0.1 39 57 46 50 76 63 21 58 18 91
0.8 0.2 39 55 43 49 75 65 21 59 17 91
0.7 0.3 38 52 41 47 74 66 20 60 16 91
0.6 0.4 37 50 38 46 74 68 20 61 15 90
0.5 0.5 37 48 35 44 73 69 20 62 14 90
0.4 0.6 36 46 32 42 72 71 20 63 13 90
0.3 0.7 35 43 30 41 71 72 20 63 12 89
0.2 0.8 35 41 27 39 70 74 20 64 11 89
0.1 0.9 34 39 24 37 69 75 19 65 10 89
0 1 33 37 21 36 68 77 19 66 9 88
PDCAAS is Additive
17
Quinoa Yellow Split Pea Limiting Amino Acid
Amino Acid Score
Protein Digestibility PDCAAS
1 0 Lysine 0.98 92 89.97 0.9 0.1 Lysine 1.00 91 91.11 0.8 0.2 Lysine 1.01 91 92.24 0.7 0.3 Lysine 1.03 91 93.36 0.6 0.4 Lysine 1.05 90 94.46
0.5 0.5 Histidine 1.06 90 95.42
0.4 0.6 Histidine 1.05 90 94.28
0.3 0.7 Threonine 1.04 89 92.48
0.2 0.8 Tryptophan 0.97 89 86.04
0.1 0.9 Tryptophan 0.87 89 77.31
0 1 Tryptophan 0.78 88 68.64
PDCAAS is Additive
18
0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0
6 0
7 0
8 0
9 0
1 0 0
% Q u in o a F lo u r
PD
CA
AS
va
lue
Blend of cooked quinoa with cooked yellow spit peas
Moving Forward
• DIAAS • Most recent method for determining protein quality
• Uses amino acid digestibility rather than protein
• Digestibility is measured at the terminal ileum
• Novel blends involving quinoa • Pulses, rice protein, lupin protein
• What effect does advanced processing have on the protein quality?
• Continued development and analysis of protein concentrates/isolates
• In vitro vs in vivo analysis of protein digestibility
19
20