owning computers without shell access 2

23
OWNING COMPUTERS WITHOUT SHELL ACCESS

Upload: royce-davis

Post on 01-Dec-2014

1.416 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

These are the slides from my talk at BSides Puerto Rico 2013. I will post a link to the slides later. Abstract: For many years Penetration Testers have relied on gaining shell access to remote systems in order to take ownership of network resources and enterprise owned assets. AntiVirus (AV) companies are becoming increasingly more aware of shell signatures and are therefore making it more and more difficult to compromise remote hosts. The current industry mentality seams to believe the answer is stealthier payloads and super complex obfuscation techniques. I believe a more effective answer might lie in alternative attack methodologies involving authenticated execution of native Windows commands to accomplish the majority of shell reliant tasks common to most network level penetration tests. The techniques I will be discussing were developed precisely with this style of attack in mind. Using these new tools, I will demonstrate how to accomplish the same degree of network level compromise that has been enjoyed in the past with shell-based attack vectors, while avoiding detection from AV solut

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Owning computers without shell access 2

OWNING COMPUTERSWITHOUT SHELL ACCESS

Page 2: Owning computers without shell access 2

Who Am I?

• Royce Davis

• Senior Consultant – Accuvant LABS

• Cofounder: http://www.pentestgeek.com

• Author jigsaw.rb

• Twitter: @R3dy__

Page 3: Owning computers without shell access 2

Talk Synopsis

• Uploading Binary Shells Is No Good

• Techniques To Avoid Shell Upload

• Metasploit Modules• Command Execution

• Local & Cached Hash Dumping

• Other Possibilities

• Demo Modules

Page 4: Owning computers without shell access 2

Background Story

• Imagine that you’re on a pentest and discover a LHF vulnerability that gives you the local admin hash to all the boxes.

• You try to use the psexec exploit module to pop a meterpreter shell on multiple systems only to get flagged by AV and stopped dead in your tracks.

• What do you do now?

• Enter SMBExec (Eric Milam a.k.a @Brav0hax)• SMBExec is a great tool, however it still uploads a binary

to the target

Page 5: Owning computers without shell access 2

Uploading Binary Shells Is No Good

• We’ve been uploading shells to take control of remote hosts since the beginning of time so what’s the big deal?

• Shells contain binary signatures that can be recognized and blocked

• Obfuscation only creates a different signature that could still be recognized and blocked

• Shells can die leaving us with no way back into the target machine

• They can also leave remnants of themselves

Page 6: Owning computers without shell access 2

What Can We Do With A Shell?

If we’re going to bypass using shells on pentests we need to first identify what purpose they serve and what additional functions to they provide.

• Command execution• Search the file system• Create users• Enumerate network resources• Upload/download files• Etc…

• Grab local/cached password hashes• Dump all AD hashes from the DC

• Any others?

Page 7: Owning computers without shell access 2

Using Native Windows Functions

Enter ‘psexec.rb’

• Metasploit already has several modules that use DCERPC to make direct authenticated requests to Windows APIs

• /exploit/windows/smb/psexec.rb• Creates & Uploads a binary payload to the target over SMB• Sends an RPC to the Service Control Manager (SCM)

• UUID: ‘367abb81-9844-35f1-ad32-98f038001003’• Creates a service, starts it, cleans up after…

• MSDN Documentation• http://

msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms685942%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Page 8: Owning computers without shell access 2

Inside psexec.rb

DCERPC Requests:The dcerpc.call instance method takes in two parameters. The first parameter is the opcode reference to the particular Windows function you wish to call. The second parameter is the function arguments in NDR (Network Data Representation) Format.

• dcerpc.call(0x0f, stubdata) – OpenSCManager

• dcerpc.call(0x0c, stubdata) – CreateService

• dcerpc.call(0x0, svc_handle) – CloseServiceHandle

• dcerpc.call(0x10, stubdata) – OpenService

• dcerpc.call(0x13, stubdata) – StartService

• dcerpc.call(0x02, stubdata) – DeleteService

• dcerpc.call(0x0, svc_handle) - CloseServiceHandle

Page 9: Owning computers without shell access 2

Psexec.rb Cont.

• This is what it looks like inside Metasploit’s psexec exploit module written by HDM

exploit/windows/smb/psexec.rb (line 254)

Page 10: Owning computers without shell access 2

CreateService

• This is the format accepted by the CreateService function

• http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/ms682450%28v=vs.85%29.aspx

Page 11: Owning computers without shell access 2

lpBinaryPathName MSDN Definition

• lpBinaryPathName [in, optional]

• The fully qualified path to the service binary file. If the path contains a space, it must be quoted so that it is correctly interpreted. For example, "d:\\my share\\myservice.exe" should be specified as "\"d:\\my share\\myservice.exe\"".

• The path can also include arguments for an auto-start service. For example, "d:\\myshare\\myservice.exe arg1 arg2". These arguments are passed to the service entry point (typically the main function).

• If you specify a path on another computer, the share must be accessible by the computer account of the local computer because this is the security context used in the remote call. However, this requirement allows any potential vulnerabilities in the remote computer to affect the local computer. Therefore, it is best to use a local file.

• psexec.rb looks like this:• C:\HjeKOplsYutVmBWn.exe Probably a Meterpreter payload

• What if we tried this instead:• C:\windows\system32\cmd.exe /C echo dir C:\ ^> outputfile.txt > launchfile.bat & C:\windows\

system32\cmd.exe /C launchfile.bat”

Page 12: Owning computers without shell access 2

The Psexec Mixin

In order to provide accessibility to this functionality for other modules we created a mixin which has been graciously accepted into the MSF.

lib/msf/core/exploit/smb/psexec.rb

• Slightly modified version of the original psexec.rb code wrapped in a function which excepts a Windows command in the following format:

• [PATH TO cmd.exe] [/C] [INSERT WINDOWS COMMAND]

• The method is called like so ‘return psexec(command)’

• Returns ‘true’ if execution was successful

• Major difference is it does not try to delete cmd.exe after execution

• Also contains a ‘smb_read_file(smbshare, host, file)’ method for convenient retrieval of command output

Page 13: Owning computers without shell access 2

Demo psexec_command.rb

• Review the source code

• Explain some of my favorite uses related to pentesting

• Demo the module

Page 14: Owning computers without shell access 2

Dumping Password Hashes

• Current methods for dumping password hashes

• Post modules that require a meterpreter shell• Upload a standalone binary like pwdump/fgdump…• These methods extract specific registry key values from the

SYSTEM, SECURITY, and/or SAM registry hive• This process can flag antivirus

• We need to somehow retrieve a copy of the registry hives and extract the hashes from them offline on our attacking system• We can look at the code from pwdump.py from the

creddump suite.

Page 15: Owning computers without shell access 2

Offline Password Hash Dumping

1. Authenticate to the system using a password/hash

2. Use the psexec mixin to execute the following Windows Commands:

• reg.exe save HKLM\SAM c:\windows\temp\sam

• reg.exe save HKLM\SYSTEM c:\windows\temp\sys

• reg.exe save HKLM\SECURITY c:\windows\temp\sec

3. Download the registry hive copies to our attacking machine

4. Remove the registry hive copies from the target

5. Open the registry hive copies on our attacking machine and extract the password hashes

Page 16: Owning computers without shell access 2

Demo hashgrab.rb & cachegrab.rb

• Thank you to:

• Brendan Dolan-Gavitt author of ‘creddump’.

• Carlos Perez – smart_hashdump.rb and other modules

• Brandon Perry – tools/reg.rb

• Review the source code

• Demo the module

Page 17: Owning computers without shell access 2

Dumping All the Hashes

• The holy grail of most network pentests can be found inside an ESE (Extensible Storage Engine) database called NTDS.dit located on the Domain Controller

• Protected by operating system

• Requires inject into lsass and/or other black magics

• Contains a BOAT LOAD of information about the system

• Including password hashes and usernames for all AD accounts!

Page 18: Owning computers without shell access 2

Enter psexec_ntdsgrab.rb

We can use the psexec_ntdsgrab module to create or target an existing VSC (Volume Shadow Copy) and safely pull down a copy of NTDS.dit to our attacking machine.

auxiliary/admin/smb/psexec_ntdsgrab.rb1. Use psexec mixin to execute windows commands for creating a VSC

• vssadmin create shadow /For=%SYSTEMDRIVE%

2. Query vssadmin for the path to the newly created VSC

• vssadmin list shadows

3. Copy NTDS.dit from the VSC to the WINDOWS\Temp directory

• copy /Y \?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolumeShadowCopy1\WINDOWS\NTDS\NTDS.dit C:\WINDOWS\Temp\ntds

4. Use reg.exe to make a copy of the SYSTEM registry hive

5. Download the ‘ntds’ and ‘sys’ files to attacking machine

6. Cleanup after ourselves

Page 19: Owning computers without shell access 2

Getting What We Want From NTDS.dit

• We’ll need to use the ‘libesedb’ C library to extract the right tables from NTDS.dit

• $ wget https://libesedb.googlecode.com/files/libesedb-alpha-20120102.tar.gz$

• $ tar xvzf libesedb-alpha-20120102.tar.gz

• $ cd libesedb-20120102/

• $ ./configure

• $ make && make install

• Once libesedb is compiled we will use esedbexport located in the ‘libesedb-20120102/esedbtools’ to export the datatable which contains the user account password hashes for AD

• http://www.pentestgeek.com/2012/11/16/dumping-domain-password-hashes-using-metasploit-ntds_hashextract-rb/

Page 20: Owning computers without shell access 2

Demo psexec_ntdsgrab.rb

• Grab NTDS.dit using MSF module

• Export tables from NTDS.dit using libesedb

• Extract hashes from exported datatable using ntds_hashextract.rb

Page 21: Owning computers without shell access 2

Closing

• Uploading a binary shell to the target can be harmful to a penetration test

• DCERPC allows us to do a lot of the functions we would ask of a binary shell without uploading one to the target

• Metasploit modules already exist to achieve remote command execution, grab local/cached password hashes and dump AD hashes from a DC

• The sky is the limit as to what else we could do if we all chose to adapt this style of thinking

Page 22: Owning computers without shell access 2

22

Questions & Answers

4/4/13

Page 23: Owning computers without shell access 2

23

Owning Computers Without Shell Access

4/4/13

Thank You!Royce DavisAccuvant LABSSenior Consultant – Attack & Pen [email protected]://www.pentestgeek.com@R3dy__