p r k in 2005
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
P R K in 2005. Bernard Mathys, MD Brussels. Brief history. 15 Y of follow-up Excimer laser Relatively easy technique Short learning curve. Limits. Pain Regression Haze ( > -6D). PRK fights back. Complications of Lasik Epithelial ingrowth Striae, folds SOS Ectasia - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
-
P R K in 2005Bernard Mathys, MDBrussels
-
Brief history15 Y of follow-upExcimer laserRelatively easy techniqueShort learning curve
-
LimitsPainRegressionHaze ( > -6D)
-
PRK fights backComplications of LasikEpithelial ingrowth Striae, foldsSOSEctasiaFlap induced HOAProblem flap size/wide OZ for hyperopia
-
PRK improvedImproved lasers: scanning, flying spot, GaussianImproved OZ, transition Z, blend ZImproved nomogramImproved tracker: centration, cyclotorsion, frequency, mechanical response ? Aspheric profile: better for HOA ?
-
AdvantagesLimits induced HOALower rate of irregular astigmatismWave-front guided: Fourier > Zernicke ?Customized treatment
-
Results
-
No higher RMS postop for high correctionNo higher RMS postop for large OZSeems to reduce RMS for OZ 6 6.5Safe and effective: no loss of VA
-
RMS changes
-
And soPRK, Lasek > Lasik ?Flap induced HOA: nomogram correctionFDA studies for Lasik. PRK ?In fact, photoablation creates HOA !!No real studies in litterature
-
PRK Follow-upPainFluctuationsHaze
-
PRK best treatmentCorneal cooling Quick removal of the epitheliumCLAINS (ketorolac) 3dTearsSterods ?
-
AINS (ketorolac)
-
PRK haze ?Activated keratocytes collagen I-IIIMore frequent if: delayed epithelial responsedeep ablation, > -9Dbroad beam, more energy, retreatment Gabbato,Ophtal. online, dec 2004Max 3 to 6 MDecreases with time: metalloprotease Kato After 1 Y: scarMMC 0.02% 2 min
-
Best healing response ?Amniotic membrane ?Interferon ?Growth factor ?PA ?
-
SoPRK indications ?Up to -5 DK < 39 and > 48KT subclinicalThin corneaDry eyesHigh astigmatismArmy, pilots, athlete
-
Even more indicationsHyperopesRefraction error after IOLRefraction error after RKRefraction error after corneal graft
-
PRK after RK
-
And PTK ?
Irregular astigmatismRecurrent erosionReshapingHerpes (under treatment)
-
Then:Do not be ashamed to perform PRKMany indicationsHaze problems tend to diminishLasek = disguised PRKNot a single ectasia after PRKGood PRK much better than a bad Lasik !!
-
Good PRK >< Bad Lasik
-
Thin corneas
-
Follow-up 1 Y
-
Limited induced aberrations
-
High astigmatism
-
Same patient, topography
-
Thank you for your attention