page 1 of 281 - national fire protection association national standards institute, inc., 25 west...

Public Comment No. 123-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]

Change 'air traffic control tower' to 'airport traffic control tower' throughout this standard.

Statement of Problem and Substantiation for Public Comment

The purpose of this change is to make the terminology of NFPA 5000 consistent with that used by the FAA and transportation industry. A similar change was made to NFPA 101 (PI# 171).

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 31-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 31.6.13]

Submitter Information Verification

Submitter Full Name: Eric Rosenbaum

Organization: Jensen Hughes

Affilliation: Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon May 16 16:39:54 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted

Resolution: SR-4004-NFPA 5000-2016

Statement: The purpose of this change is to make the terminology of NFPA 5000 consistent with that used by the FAA andtransportation industry. A similar change was made to NFPA 101 (PI# 171).

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/ContentFetcher?commentPara...

1 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


Additional Proposed Changes

File Name Description Approved

5000_CCN_16.pdf 5000 CC Note #16


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 16 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” throughout the code.

This action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA 5000-2016 [Global Input]


Submitter Full Name: CC on BLD_AAC

Organization: NFPA CC ON BUILDING CODE

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Mar 07 10:13:08 EST 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 16 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TCon Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically locking systems” to “delayed egress electricallocking systems” throughout the code.



2 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 16-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]


Submitter Full Name: BLD-AAC

Organization: [ Not Specified ]

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Jan 08 14:15:54 EST 2016

Committee Statement and Meeting Notes

CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to change the term “delayed egress electrically lockingsystems” to “delayed egress electrical locking systems” throughout the code.


Ballot Results

This item has passed ballot

18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All

1 Affirmative with Comments

0 Negative with Comments

0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All

DiCristina, Salvatore

Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.

Roberts, Richard Jay

Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.

Affirmative with Comment

Laramee, Scott T.

National Fire Protection Association Report http://submittals.nfpa.org/TerraViewWeb/FormLaunch?id=/TerraView/C...

1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:44 PM

of 281

No comment, but no way to accept as "affirmative" without accepting all as "affirmative in the ballot portal.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:44 PM

of 281




101_CCN_2.pdf 101 CC Note #2


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 2 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to consider further revising the definition of Mall Structure and Mall Concourse to read as follows:

3.3.68.12* Mall Structure. A single structure enclosing a number of tenants or tenant buildings having a main entrance into one or more mall concourses. For the purpose of this Code, anchor buildings shall not be considered as a part of the mall structure.(BLD-MER)

3.3.397 Mall Concourse. A common pedestrian area within a mall structure that serves as access for two or more tenants and does not exceed three levels that are open to each other. (BLD-MER)Changes are consistent with changes to the definition of Mall Structure in NFPA 101. This action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 2-NFPA 5000-2016 [Global Input]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu Mar 03 15:56:43 EST 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected but see related SR

Resolution: See SR-6510 and SR-6511-NFPA 5000-2016

Statement: In response to the Correlating Committee via Public Comment No. 4, the definition of mall concourse is revised to beconsistent with the definition used in NFPA 101.


3 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 2-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Global Input ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to consider further revising thedefinition of Mall Structure and Mall Concourse to read as follows:

3.3.68.12* Mall Structure. A single structure enclosing a number of tenants or tenant buildings having a main entrance into one ormore mall concourses. For the purpose of this Code, anchor buildings shall not be considered as a part of the mall structure.(BLD-MER)

3.3.397 Mall Concourse. A common pedestrian area within a mall structure that serves as access for two or more tenants anddoes not exceed three levels that are open to each other. (BLD-MER)

Changes are consistent with changes to the definition of Mall Structure in NFPA 101.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:45 PM

of 281

Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:45 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 70-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 1.7.6.3.3.4 ]

1.7.6.3.3.4

Deferred submittal of construction documents shall be approved by the authority having jurisdiction prior to the issuance of a buildingpermit. The RDP for design shall identify all deferred submittals in writing with the application for permit. Construction documents fordeferred submittal items All documents prepared by people other than the RDP shall be reviewed by the RDP for design for generalconformance to the RDP’s design and then submitted to the authority having jurisdiction with a letter, stamp or other evidenceindicating that they have been reviewed by the RDP. Deferred submittal items shall not be installed until their performancerequirements and construction documents have been approved by the authority having jurisdiction.


Currently there is no requirement for evidence that the RDP has in fact reviewed the deferred submittal. This comment clarifies the PI which requires proof from the RDP that the deferred submittals are in general conformance with the RDP’s design. This clarifies that a letter is not the only way to provide such evidence. This change clarifies that the RDP is responsible for overall coordination and compatibility of all design documents and addresses the Technical Committee concerns in the committee statement.

Related Item

Public Input No. 113-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 1.7.6.3.3.4]


Submitter Full Name: Jim Muir

Organization: Building Safety Division, Clark County, Washington

Affilliation: NFPA's Building Code Development Committee (BCDC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue May 10 17:27:26 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected

Resolution: The proposed revision does not clarify the requirement. The RDP is responsible for the overall project.


4 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 2.3 ]

2.3 Other Publications.

2.3.1 AA Publications.

Aluminum Association, Inc., 1525 Wilson Blvd., Suite 600, Arlington, VA 22209.

Aluminum Design Manual: Part 1A, Aluminum Structures, Allowable Stress Design, and Part 1-B, Aluminum Structures, Load andResistance Factor Design of Buildings and Similar Type Structures, 2015.

ASM 35, Specifications for Aluminum Sheet Metal Work in Building Construction, Construction Manual Series Section 5, 2000.

2.3.2 ACI Publications.

American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3434.

ACI 216.1, Code Requirements for Determining Fire Resistance of Concrete and Masonry Construction Assemblies, 2014.

ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, 2014.

ACI 506.2, Specification for Shotcrete, 2013.

ACI 530/530.1, Building Code Requirements for Masonry Structures, 2013.

ACI 530.1/ASCE 6/TMS 602, Specification for Masonry Structures, 2005. (See previous for updated version of same document.)

2.3.3 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive, Suite 700, Chicago, IL 60601-1802.

ANSI/AISC 341, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.

ANSI/AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.

2.3.4 AISI Publications.

American Iron and Steel Institute, 25 Massachusetts Avenue N.W., Suite 800, Washington, DC 20001-1431.

AISI-S100, North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members, 2016.

AISI-S220, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing — Nonstructural Members, 2015.

AISI-S230, Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing — Prescriptive Method for One- and Two-Family Dwellings, 2015.

AISI-S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing, 2015.

AISI-S400, North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems, 2015.

2.3.5 AITC Publications.

American Institute of Timber Construction, 7012 S. Revere Parkway, Suite 140, Centennial, CO 80112.

ANSI/AITC A190.1, American National Standard, Structural Glued Laminated Timber, 2007.

2.3.6 ANSI Publications.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10036.

ANSI A14.3, Safety Requirements for Fixed Ladders, 2008.

ANSI A208.1, Standard for Particleboard, 2009.

ANSI A1264.1, Safety Requirements for Workplace Floor and Wall Openings, Stairs and Railing Systems, 2007.

ANSI Z 97.1, Glazing Materials Used in Buildings, Safety Performance Specifications and Methods of Test, 2009, Errata 2013.

2.3.7 ASCE Publications.

American Society of Civil Engineers, 1801 Alexander Bell Drive, Reston, VA 20191-4400.

ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010, including Supplement 1, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 8, Standard Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members, 201X.

ASCE/SEI 19, Structural Applications of Steel Cables for Buildings, 2016.

ASCE/SEI 24, Flood Resistant Design and Construction, 2014.

ASCE/SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural Fire Protection, 2016.

ASCE/SEI 41, Seismic Evaluation Rehabilitation of Existing Buildings, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 55, Tension Membrane Structures, 2016.


5 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.8 ASHRAE Publications.

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.

ASHRAE Handbook — Fundamentals, 2013.

ASHRAE STD 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, 2013, Errata 2015.

ASHRAE STD 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, 2013, Errata 2014.

ASHRAE STD 90.1 IP, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2013, Errata 2014.

ASHRAE STD 90.2, Energy-Efficient Design of Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2007, including approved addendum b.

ASHRAE STD 15 & 34, Safety Standard for Refrigeration Systems, 2015.

2.3.9 ASME Publications.

ASME International, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME A17.1/CSA B 44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 2013.

ASME A17.7/CSA B 44.7, Performance-Based Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 2007, reaffirmed 2012.

ASME A18.1, Safety Standard for Platform Lifts and Stairway Chairlifts, 2014.

ASME B20.1, Safety Standard for Conveyors and Related Equipment, 2012.

ASME B31.3, Process Piping, 2014.

2.3.10 ASSE Publications.

American Society of Safety Engineers, 1520 N. Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, IL 60068.

ANSI/ASSE A1264.1, Safety Requirements for Workplace Walking/Working Surfaces and Their Access; Workplace Floor, Wall andRoof Openings; Stairs and Guardrails Systems, 2007.


6 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.11 ASTM Publications.


7 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. www.astm.org

ASTM A6/A6M, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Rolled Structural Steel Bars, Plates, Shapes, and Sheet Piling,2014.

ASTM A36/A36M, Standard Specification for Carbon Structural Steel, 2014.

ASTM A153/A153M, Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware, 2009 2016 .

ASTM A252, Standard Specification for Welded and Seamless Steel Pipe Piles, 2010.

ASTM A283/A283M, Standard Specification for Low and Intermediate Tensile Strength Carbon Steel Plates, 2013.

ASTM A463/A463M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-Coated, by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010 2015 .

ASTM A572/A572M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Columbium-vanadium Structural Steel, 2013a 2015 .

ASTM A588/A588M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Structural Steel up to 50 ksi (345 MPa) Minimum Yield Point,with Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance, 2010 2015 .

ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) bythe Hot-Dip Process, 2013 2015 .

ASTM A690/A690M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Nickel, Copper, Phosphorus Steel H-piles and Sheet Pilingwith Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance for Use in Marine Environments, 2013a.

ASTM A706/A706M, Standard Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, 2014 2016 .

ASTM A755/A755M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Metallic Coated by the Hot-Dip Process and Prepainted by theCoil-Coating Process for Exterior Exposed Building Products, 2015.

ASTM A792/A792M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, 55% Aluminum-Zinc Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM A875/A875M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-5% Aluminum Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2013.

ASTM A924/A924M, Standard Specification for General Requirements for Steel Sheet, Metallic-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2014.

ASTM B101, Standard Specification for Lead-Coated Copper Sheet and Strip for Building Construction, 2012.

ASTM B209, Standard Specification for Aluminum and Aluminum-Alloy Sheet and Plate, 2014.

ASTM C28/C28M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Plasters, 2010, reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C35, Standard Specification for Inorganic Aggregates for Use in Gypsum Plaster, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C59/C59M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Casting Plaster and Gypsum Molding Plaster, 2000, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C61/C61M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Keenes Cement, 2000, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C90, Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, 2014 2015 .

ASTM C91/C91M, Standard Specification for Masonry Cement, 2012.

ASTM C150/C150M, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, 2012 2016 .

ASTM C206, Standard Specification for Finishing Hydrated Lime, 2014.

ASTM C208, Standard Specification for Cellulosic Fiber Insulating Board, 2012.

ASTM C317/C317M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Concrete, 2000, reapproved 2010 2015 .

ASTM C406/C406M, Standard Specification for Roofing Slate, 2010 2015 .

ASTM C472, Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete, 1999 (2009) ,reapproved 2014 .

ASTM C475/C475M, Standard Specification for Joint Compound and Joint Tape for Finishing Gypsum Board, 2002 (2007) 2015 .

ASTM C476, Standard Specification for Grout for Masonry, 1999, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C514, Standard Specification for Nails for the Application of Gypsum Board, 2004, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C552, Standard Specification for Cellular Glass Thermal Insulation, 2014 2016 .

ASTM C557, Standard Specification for Adhesives for Fastening Gypsum Wallboard to Wood Framing, 2003(2009) e1.

ASTM C578, Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation, 2014a 2015 .

ASTM C587, Standard Specification for Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C588/C588M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Base for Veneer Plasters, 2003 e1 (Superceded by ASTM C1396/C1396M).

ASTM C591, Standard Specification for Unfaced Preformed Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation, 2013 2015 .

ASTM C595/C595M, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, 2014 2016 .

ASTM C631, Standard Specification for Bonding Compounds for Interior Gypsum Plastering, 2009, reapproved 2014.

ASTM C645, Standard Specification for Nonstructural Steel Framing Members, 2014.

ASTM C726, Standard Specification for Mineral Fiber Roof Insulation Board, 2012.

ASTM C728, Standard Specification for Perlite Thermal Insulation Board, 2013 2016 .

ASTM C836/C836M, Standard Specification for High Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane forUse with Separate Wearing Course, 2012 2015 .


8 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM C840, Standard Specification for Application and Finishing of Gypsum Board, 2013.

ASTM C841, Standard Specification for Installation of Interior Lathing and Furring, 2003, reapproved 2013.

ASTM C842, Standard Specification for Application of Interior Gypsum Plaster, 2005 (2010)e1 , reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C843, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 1999, reapproved 2012.

ASTM C844, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Base to Receive Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved 20102015 .

ASTM C847, Standard Specification for Metal Lath, 2014a .

ASTM C887, Standard Specification for Packaged, Dry, Combined Materials for Surface Bonding Mortar, 2013.

ASTM C897, Standard Specification for Aggregate for Job-Mixed Portland Cement-Based Plasters, 2005, reapproved 2014 2015 .

ASTM C920, Standard Specification for Elastomeric Joint Sealants, 2014a.

ASTM C926, Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement-Based Plaster, 2006 2016a .

ASTM C932, Standard Specification for Surface-Applied Bonding Compounds for Exterior Plastering, 2006, reaffirmed reapproved 2013.

ASTM C933, Standard Specification for Welded Wire Lath, 2014.

ASTM C946, Standard Practice for Construction of Dry-Stacked, Surface-Bonded Walls, 2010.

ASTM C954, Standard Specification for Steel Drill Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or Metal Plaster Bases toSteel Studs from 0.033 in. (0.84 mm) to 0.112 in. (2.84 mm) in Thickness, 2011 2015 .

ASTM C955, Standard Specification for Load-Bearing (Transverse and Axial) Steel Studs, Runners (Tracks), and Bracing or Bridgingfor Screw Application of Gypsum Panel Products and Metal Plaster Bases, 2011c 2015 .

ASTM C956, Standard Specification for Installation of Cast-in-Place Reinforced Gypsum Concrete, Reapproved 2010 2004,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM C957/C957M, Standard Specification for High-Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane withIntegral Wearing Surface, 2015.

ASTM C1002, Standard Specification for Steel Self-Piercing Tapping Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or MetalPlaster Bases to Wood Studs or Steel Studs, 2014.

ASTM C1029, Standard Specification for Spray-Applied Rigid Cellular Polyurethane Thermal Insulation, 2013 2015 .

ASTM C1032, Standard Specification for Woven Wire Plaster Base, 2014.

ASTM C1047, Standard Specification for Accessories for Gypsum Wallboard and Gypsum Veneer Base, 2014a.

ASTM C1063, Standard Specification for Installation of Lathing and Furring to Receive Interior and Exterior Portland Cement-BasedPlaster, 2014d 2016a .

ASTM C1167, Standard Specification for Clay Roof Tiles, 2011.

ASTM C1177/C1177M, Standard Specification for Glass Mat Gypsum Substrate for Use as Sheathing, 2013.

ASTM C1178/C1178M, Standard Specification for Glass Mat Water-Resistant Gypsum Backing Panel, 2013.

ASTM C1278/C1278M, Standard Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Gypsum Panel, 2007a, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM C 1280 C1280 , Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Sheathing, 2013a.

ASTM C 1289 C1289 , Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board, 2014a 2016 .

ASTM C1328/C1328M, Standard Specification for Plastic (Stucco) Cement, 2012.

ASTM C1396/C1396M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Board, 2014a.

ASTM C1491, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Pavers, 2014.

ASTM C1492, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Tile, 2003, reapproved 2009.

ASTM C1629/C1629M, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels, 2014a 2015 .

ASTM D25, Standard Specification for Round Timber Piles, 2012.

ASTM D41/D41M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Primer Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2011.

ASTM D43/D43M, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Primer Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2013e1.

ASTM D86, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure, 2012 2015 .

ASTM D225, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles (Organic Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2007. (Withdrawn)

ASTM D226/D226M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2009.

ASTM D227/D227M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar-Saturated Organic Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2003 (2012)e1.

ASTM D312/D312M , Standard Specification for Asphalt Used in Roofing, 2000 reapproved 2006 2015 .

ASTM D450/D450M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar Pitch Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2007, (2013)e1.

ASTM D635, Standard Test Method for Rate of Burning and/or Extent and Time of Burning of Plastics in a Horizontal Position, 2014.

ASTM D1079, Standard Terminology Relating to Roofing, Waterproofing, and Bituminous Materials, 2013e1 2016 .


9 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM D1143/D1143M, Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load, 2007, reapproved 2013.

ASTM D1227, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Used as a Protective Coating for Roofing, 2013.

ASTM D1761, Standard Test Methods for Mechanical Fasteners in Wood, 2012.

ASTM D1863/D1863M, Standard Specification for Mineral Aggregate Used on Built-Up Roofs, 2005, 2012 Errata 1.

ASTM D1929, Standard Test Method for Determining Ignition Temperature of Plastics, 2014 2016 .

ASTM D1970/D1970M, Standard Specification for Self-Adhering Polymer Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Used as SteepRoofing Underlayment for Ice Dam Protection, 2015a .

ASTM D2178/D2178M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2014 2015a .

ASTM D2487, Standard Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System), 2011.

ASTM D2626/D2626M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated and Coated Organic Felt Base Sheet Used in Roofing, 2004,(2012)e1.

ASTM D2823, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Coatings, 2005. (Withdrawn 2011)

ASTM D2843, Standard Test Method for Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plastics, 2010.

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved 20112015 .

ASTM D2898, Standard Test Methods for Accelerated Weathering of Fire-Retardant-Treated Wood for Fire Testing, 2010.

ASTM D3019, Standard Specification for Lap Cement Used with Asphalt Roll Roofing, Non Fibered, Asbestos Fibered, and NonAsbestos Fibered, 2008.

ASTM D3161/D3161M, Standard Test Method for Wind-Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (Fan-Induced Method), 2014 2016 .

ASTM D3201/D3201M, Standard Test Method for Hygroscopic Properties of Fire-Retardant Wood and Wood-Base Products, 2013.

ASTM D3462/D3462M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles Made from Glass Felt and Surfaced with Mineral Granules,2010a.

ASTM D3468/D3468M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Neoprene and Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene Used in Roofing andWaterproofing, 1999, (2013)e1.

ASTM D3737, Standard Practice for Establishing Allowable Properties for Structural Glued Laminated Timber (Glulam), 2012.

ASTM D3746, Standard Test Method for Impact Resistance of Bituminous Roofing Systems, 1985,reapproved 2008.

ASTM D3747, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Adhesive for Adhering Roof Insulation, 1979 (2007). (Withdrawn)

ASTM D3909/D3909M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roll Roofing (Glass Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2014.

ASTM D4022/D4022M RL, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Containing, 2007 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4318, Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, 2010 (2014)e1.

ASTM D4434/D4434M, Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) Sheet Roofing, 2012 2015 .

ASTM D4479/D4479M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Coatings — Asbestos-Free, 2007, (2012)e1.

ASTM D4586/D4586M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roof Cement, Asbestos-Free, 2007 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4601/D4601M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass Fiber Base Sheet Used in Roofing, 2004 (2012)e1.

ASTM D4637/D4637M, Standard Specification for EPDM Sheet Used in a Single-Ply Roof Membrane, 2010 2014e1 2015 .

ASTM D4869/D4869M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Underlayment Used in Steep Slope Roofing, 2005(2011)e1 2016 .

ASTM D4897/D4897M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass-Fiber Venting Base Sheet Used in Roofing, 2001,reapproved 2009.

ASTM D4990, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 1997a (2005)e1, reapproved 20112013 .

ASTM D5019, Standard Specification for Reinforced Non-Vulcanized Polymeric Sheet Used in Roofing Membrane, 2007a.(Withdrawn standard)

ASTM D5055, Standard Specification for Establishing and Monitoring Structural Capacities of Prefabricated Wood I-Joists, 2013e1.

ASTM D5456, Standard Specification for Evaluation of Structural Composite Lumber Products, 2014b.

ASTM D5516, Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Flexural Properties of Fire-Retardant Treated Softwood Plywood Exposed toElevated Temperatures, 2009.

ASTM D5643/D5643M , Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Free, 2009.

ASTM D5664, Standard Test Method for Evaluating the Effects of Fire-Retardant Treatments and Elevated Temperatures on StrengthProperties of Fire-Retardant Treated Lumber, 2010.

ASTM D5665/D5665M, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Fabrics Used in Cold-Applied Roofing and Waterproofing, 1999a(2014)e1.

ASTM D5726, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Fabrics Used in Hot-Applied Roofing and Waterproofing, 1998, reapproved2013.

ASTM D6083, Standard Specification for Liquid Applied Acrylic Coating Used in Roofing, 2005e1. (Withdrawn standard)


10 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM D6162/D6161M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Using aCombination of Polyester and Glass Fiber Reinforcements, 2000a (2015)e1.

ASTM D6163/D6163M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials UsingGlass Fiber Reinforcements, 2000 (2015)e1.

ASTM D6164/D6164M, Standard Specification for Styrene Butadiene Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials UsingPolyester Reinforcements, 2011.

ASTM D6222/D6222M, Standard Specification for Atactic Polypropylene (APP) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Using PolyesterReinforcements, 2011.

ASTM D6223/D6223M, Standard Specification for Atactic Polypropylene (APP) Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Using aCombination of Polyester and Glass Fiber Reinforcements, 2002 (2009)e1.

ASTM D6298, Standard Specification for Fiberglass Reinforced Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet with aFactory Applied Metal Surface, 2013.

ASTM D6305, Standard Practice for Calculating Bending Strength Design Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated PlywoodRoof Sheathing, 2008, (2015)e1 .

ASTM D6380/D6380M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Roll Roofing (Organic Felt), 2003 (2013)e1.

ASTM D6381/D6381M, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Asphalt Shingle Mechanical Uplift Resistance, 2008 (2013)e12015 .

ASTM D6694/D6694M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Silicone Coating Used in Spray Polyurethane Foam Roofing, 2008(2013)e1 2015 .

ASTM D6754/D6754M, Standard Specification for Ketone Ethylene Ester Based Sheet Roofing, 2010 2015 .

ASTM D6757, Standard Specification for Steep-Slope Underlayment Felt Containing Inorganic Fibers, 2007, reapproved 2013.

ASTM D6841, Standard Practice for Calculating Design Valve Treatment Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated Lumber,2008 2016 .

ASTM D6878/D6878M, Standard Specification for Thermoplastic Polyolefin Based Sheet Roofing, 2013.

ASTM D7032, Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite Deck Boards and GuardrailSystems (Guards or Handrails), 2014 2015

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2015a 2015 b .

ASTM E90, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Airborne Sound Transmission Loss of Building Partitions andElements, 2009.

ASTM E96/E96M, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E108, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings, 2011.

ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C, 2012 2016 .

ASTM E492, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling AssembliesUsing the Tapping Machine, 2009, (2016) e1 .

ASTM E605/E605M , Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied toStructural Members, 1993, reapproved 2011 (2015)e1 .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c2015 , (2015)e1 .

ASTM E736, Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members, 2000.reapproved 2011. , (2015)e1 .

ASTM E814, Standard Test Method for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Fire Stops, 2013a.

ASTM E970, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Exposed Attic Floor Insulation Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source,2014.

ASTM E1300, Standard Practice for Determining Load Resistance of Glass in Buildings, 2012 (2012)e1.

ASTM E1591, Standard Guide for Obtaining Data for Deterministic Fire Models, 2013.

ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static AirPressure Difference, 2005.

ASTM E1602, Standard Guide for Construction of Solid Fuel Burning Masonry Heaters, 2005, reapproved 2012.

ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, , reapproved 2012 2015 .

ASTM E2072, Standard Specification for Photoluminescent (Phoshorescent) Safety Markings, 2014.

ASTM E2073, Standard Test Method for Photopic Luminance of Photoluminescent (Phoshorescent) Markings, 2010.

ASTM E2074, Standard Test Method for Fire tests of Door Assemblies, Including Positive Pressure Testing of Side-Hinged andPivoted Swinging Door Assemblies, 2000 e1 (withdrawn 2007).

ASTM E2174, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Stops, 2014b.

ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-story Test Apparatus, 2015a 2015 b .


11 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM E2393, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Resistive Joint Systems and Perimeter Fire Barriers, 2010a,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) Wall orCeiling Coverings, and of Facings and Wood Veneers Intended to be Applied on Site Over a Wood Substrate to Assess SurfaceBurning Characteristics, 2015a.

ASTM E2573, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Site-fabricated Stretch Systems to Assess SurfaceBurning Characteristics, 2012.

ASTM E 2599 E2599 , Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation , Radiant Barrier, and VinylStretch Ceiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, 2015.

ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750Degrees C, 2012 2016 .

ASTM E2768, Standard Test Method for Extended Duration Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2011.

ASTM F547, Standard Terminology of Nails for Use with Wood and Wood-Base Materials, 2006, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F851, Standard Test Method for Self-Rising Seat Mechanisms, 1987, reapproved 2013.

ASTM F1292, Standard Specification for Impact Attenuation of Surfacing Materials Within the Use Zone of Playground Equipment,2013.

ASTM F1577, Standard Test Methods for Detention Locks for Swinging Doors, 2005, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F1667, Standard Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes, and Staples, 2013 2015 .

ASTM F1951, Standard Specification for Determination of Accessibility of Surface Systems Under and Around PlaygroundEquipment, 2014.

2.3.12 AWC Publications.

American Wood Council, 222 Catoctin Circle SE #201, Leesburg, VA 20175.

ANSI/AWC NDS, National Design Specifications (NDS) for Wood Construction, 2015.

AWC NDS Supplement, NDS Supplement — Design Values for Wood Construction, 2015.

AWC PWF, Permanent Wood Foundation Design Specification, 2015.

AWC SDPWS, Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic, 2015.

AWC Span Tables for Joists and Rafters, 2012.

AWC Wood Construction Data No. 4, Plank and Beam Framing for Residential Buildings, 2003.

ANSI/AWC WFCM, Wood Frame Construction Manual for One- and Two-Family Dwellings, 2015.


12 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.13 AWPA Publications.

American Wood Protection Association, P.O. Box 361784, Birmingham, AL 35236-1784.

AWPA C1, Standard for Preservative Treatment of All Timber Products by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn standard)

AWPA C2, Standard for the Preservative Treatment of Lumber, Timber, Bridge Ties, and Mine Ties by Pressure Processes,2002.(Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C3, Piles— Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C4, Poles— Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C9, Plywood— Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C14, Wood for Highway Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C15, Wood for Commercial-Residential Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (WithdrawnStandard)

AWPA C16, Wood Used on Farms — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C22, Lumber and Plywood for Permanent Wood Foundations — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.(Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C23, Round Poles and Posts Used in Building Construction — Preservative Treatment by Pressure Processes, 2003.(Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C24, Sawn Timber Piles Used for Residential and Commercial Building, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C28, Standard for Preservative Treatment of Structural Glued Laminated Members and Lamination Before Gluing of SouthernPine, Coastal Douglas Fir, Hemfir, and Western Hemlock by Pressure Processes, 2003. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C31, Lumber Used Out of Contact with the Ground and Continuously Protected from Liquid Water—Treatment by PressureProcesses, 2002. (Withdrawn Standard)

AWPA C33, Standard for Preservative Treatment of Structural Composite Lumber by Pressure Processes, 2003. (WithdrawnStandard)

AWPA M4, Standard for the Care of Preservative-Treated Wood Products, 2011 2015 .

AWPA P1/P13, Standard for Creosote Preservative, 2013.

AWPA P2, Standard for Creosote Solutions, 2013.

AWPA P5, Standard for Waterborne Preservatives, 2014.

AWPA P8, Standard for Oil-borne Preservatives, 2014.

AWPA P9, Standards for Solvents and Formulations for Organic Preservative Systems, 2010. (Withdrawn standard)

2.3.14 BHMA Publications.

Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association, 355 Lexington Avenue, 17th floor, New York, NY 10017-6603.

ANSI/BHMA A156.3, Exit Devices, 2014.

ANSI/BHMA A156.10, Power Operated Pedestrian Doors, 2011.

ANSI/BHMA A156.19, Power Assist and Low Energy Power Operated Doors, 2013.

ANSI/BHMA A156.27, Power and Manual Operated Revolving Doors, 2011.

ANSI/BHMA A156.38, Low Energy Power Operated Sliding and Folding Doors, 2014.

2.3.15 CGSB Publications.

Canadian General Standards Board, Place du Portage III, 6B1, 11 Laurier St., Gatineau, Quebec, KiA 1G6, Canada.

37-GP-52M, Roofing and Waterproofing Membrane, Sheet Applied, Elastomeric, 2005.

37-GP-56M, Membrane, Modified, Bituminous, Prefabricated, and Reinforced for Roofing, 1985. (Withdrawn 2013)

CAN/CGSB-37.54, Polyvinyl Chloride Roofing and Waterproofing Membrane, 1995. (Withdrawn 2012)

2.3.16 Composite Panel Association Publications.

Composite Panel Association, Composite Wood Council, 19465 Deerfield Avenue, Suite 306, Leesburg, VA 20176.

ANSI/CPA A135.4, Basic Hardboard, 2012.

ANSI/CPA A135.5, Prefinished Hardboard Paneling, 2012.

ANSI/CPA A135.6, Hardboard Siding, 2012.

2.3.17 DASMA Publications.

Door and Access Systems Manufacturers Association, International, 1300 Summer Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44115-2851.

ANSI/DASMA 107, Room Fire Test Standard for Garage Doors Using Foam Plastic Insulation, 2004, revised 2012.

2.3.18 EIMA Publications.

EIFS Industry Members Association, 513 Broad Street, Suite 210, Falls Church, VA 22046-3257.

ANSI/EIMA 99A, Exterior Insulation and Finish Systems (EIFS), 2001.


13 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.19 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919-4923.

FM Approval 4411, Insulated Wall Constructions, 1974.

FM Approval 4435, Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems, 2013.

FM Approval 4450, Class I Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

FM Approval 4470, Single-Ply, Polymer-modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Covers for use in ClassI and Non-combustible Roof Deck Construction, 2010.

FM Approval 4471, Class 1 Panel Roofs, 2010.

FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer Ice Balls, 2011.

FM Approval 4474, Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/orNegative Differential Pressures, 2010.

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials, or Coatings andExterior Wall Systems, 2010.

2.3.20 FRSA/RTI Publications.

Florida Roofing, Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors Association, 4111 Metric Drive, Suite 6, Winter Park, FL 32792.

07320/1, Concrete and Clay Roof Tile Installation Manual, fourth edition, 2001.

2.3.21 GA Publications.

Gypsum Association, 6525 Belcrest Road, Suite 480, Hyattsville, MD 20782.

GA-216, Application and Finishing of Gypsum Panel Products, 2013.

GA-600, Fire Resistance Design Manual Sound Control, 2012.

2.3.22 HPVA Publications.

Hardwood Plywood and Veneer Association, 1825 Michael Faraday Drive, Reston, VA 20190.

ANSI/HPVA HP-1, American National Standard for Hardwood and Decorative Plywood, 2004, reapproved 2010.

2.3.23 IAPMO Publications.

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 4755 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761.

UMC, Uniform Mechanical Code, 2012 2018 .

UPC, Uniform Plumbing Code, 2012 2018 .

2.3.24 ICC Publications.

International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20001-2070.

ICC/ANSI A117.1, Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, 2009.

ICC 600, Standard for Residential Construction in High Wind Regions, 2013.

IRC, International Residential Code, 2015.

2.3.25 IME Publications.

Institute of Makers of Explosives, 1120 19th Street, NW, Suite 310, Washington, DC 20036–3605.

IME SLP 2, “The American Table of Distances,” June 1991.

2.3.26 NAAMM Publications.

National Association of Architectural Metal Manufacturers, 800 Roosevelt Rd. Bldg. C, Suite 132, Glen Ellyn, IL 60137.

ANSI/NAAMM FP 1001, Guide Specifications for Design of Metal Flagpoles Manual, 2007.

2.3.27 NCMA Publications.

National Concrete Masonry Association, 13750 Sunrise Valley Drive, Herndon, VA 20171.

Design Manual for Segmental Retaining Walls, 3rd edition, 2010.

2.3.28 PCA Publications.

Portland Cement Association, 5420 Old Orchard Road, Skokie, IL 60077-1083.

PCA 100, Prescriptive Design of Exterior Concrete Walls for One- and Two-Family Dwellings, 2012.

2.3.29 PTI Publications.

Post-Tensioning Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331.

PTI DC10.1, Design and Construction of Post-Tensioned Slabs-On-Ground, 3rd edition, 2004, errata 2010.

2.3.30 RMI Publications.

Rack Manufacturers Institute, 8720 Red Oak Boulevard, Suite 201, Charlotte, NC 28217.

RMI/ANSI MH16.1, Specification for the Design, Testing and Utilization of Industrial Steel Storage Racks, 2012.


14 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.31 SDI Publications.

Steel Deck Institute, P.O. Box 426, Glenshaw, PA 15116.

ANSI/SDI-C, Standard for Composite Steel Floor Deck – Slabs, 2017.

ANSI/SDI-NC, Standard for Non-Composite Steel Floor Deck, 2017.

ANSI/SDI-QA/QC, Standard for Quality Control and Quality Assurance for Installation of Steel Deck, 2017.

ANSI/SDI-RD, Standard for Steel Roof Deck, 2017.

2.3.32 SJI Publications.

Steel Joist Institute, 234 W. Cheves Street, Florence, SC 29501.

SJI CJ, Standard Specifications for Composite Steel Joist, CJ-Series, 2015.

SJI-100, Standard Specification for K-Series, LH-Series, DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders, 2015.

2.3.33 SMACNA Publications.

Sheet Metal and Air Conditioning Contractors' National Association, 4201 Lafayette Center Drive, Chantilly, VA 20151-1219.

HVAC Duct Construction Standards — Metal and Flexible, 2005.

2.3.34 SFPA/SPC Publications.

Southern Forest Products Association, 6660 Riverside Drive, Suite 212, Matarie, LA 70003 / Southern Pine Council, 2900 IndianaAvenue, Kenner, LA 70065.

Permanent Wood Foundations: Design & Construction Guide,2013.

2.3.35 SPRI Publications.

SPRI, 465 Waverly Oaks Road, Suite 421, Waltham, MA 02452.

ANSI/SPRI/FM Approval 4435 ES-1, Wind Design Standard for Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems, 2011.

ANSI/SPRI RP-4, Wind Design Standard for Ballasted Single-Ply Roofing Systems, 2013.

2.3.36 TIA Publications.

Telecommunications Industry Association, 2500 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22201.

TIA-222-G, Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna Structures,2005, Addendum 4, 2014. (SupercedesANSI/TIA/EIA 222-F)

2.3.37 TPI Publications.

Truss Plate Institute, Inc., 218 North Lee St., Suite 312, Alexandria, VA 22314.

ANSI/TPI 1, National Design Standard for Metal Plate Connected Wood Truss Construction, 2007, errata 2011.


15 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2.3.38 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

UL 9, Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies, 2015.

UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2008, revised 2015.

UL 10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2015.

UL 217, Standard for Single and Multiple Station Smoke Alarms, 2006, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2003 2011 , revised 2014 2015 .

UL 294, Standard for Access Control System Units, 1999 2013 , revised 2014 2015 .

UL 305, Standard for Safety Panic Hardware, 2014.

UL 555, Standard for Fire Dampers, 2006, revised 2014 2013 .

UL 555C, Standard for Ceiling Dampers, 2006, revised 2014.

UL 555S, Standard for Smoke Dampers, 1999, revised 2014.

UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies, 2006, revised 2013.

UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, revised 2013.

UL 790, Standard for Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Roof Coverings, 2004, revised 2014.

UL 924, Standard for Emergency Lighting and Power Equipment, 2006, revised 2014 2015 .

UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction, 2009 1996 , revised 2013 2012 .

UL 1256, Standard for Fire Test of Roof Deck Constructions, 2002, revised 2013.

UL 1286, Standard for Office Furnishings, 2008, revised 2014 2015 .

UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material, 1997, revised 2013.

UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems, 2012 2015 .

UL 1975, Standard for Fire Tests for Foamed Plastics Used for Decorative Purposes, 2006.

UL 1994, Standard for Luminous Egress Path Marking Systems, 2004, revised 2015 .

UL 2218, Standard for Impact Resistance of Prepared Roof Covering Materials, 2010, revised 2012 .

UL 2390, Standard for Tests for Wind Resistant Asphalt Shingles with Sealed Tabs, 2003, revised 2009.

ULC CAN /ULC S102 S102 .2, Standard Method of Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Flooring, Floor Coverings andMiscellaneous Materials and Assemblies, 2010.

2.3.39 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20402 20401-0001 .

Federal Specification UUB UU - B- 790a, Specification for Building Paper, Vegetable Fiber: Kraft, Waterproofed, Water Repellent, andFiber Resistant, 1992.

FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, 2000. (Superceded by ASCE 41)

Title 18, United States Code, Chapter 40, “Importation, Manufacture, Distribution and Storage of Explosive Materials.”

Title 28, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 35 and Part 36, Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG).

Title 36, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 1192.

U.S. Department of Justice, 2010 ADA Standards, September 15, 2010.

USDOC Voluntary Product Standard PS 1, Structural Plywood, 2009.

USDOC Voluntary Product Standard PS 2, Performance Standard for Wood-based Structural-Use Panels, 2004 2010 .

USDOC Voluntary Product Standard PS 20, American Softwood Lumber Standard, 2010.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1201, Safety Standard for Architectural Glazing Materials, 1977.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1209, Interim Safety Standard for Cellulose Insulation, 1979.

CPSC, 16 CFR 1404, Cellulose Insulation, 1979.

2.3.40 WRI/CRSI Publications.

Wire Reinforcement Institute, 942 E. Main Street, Hartford, CT 06103.

TF 700-R, Design of Slabs-on-Ground, 2007.

2.3.41 Other Publications.

Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 11th edition, Merriam-Webster, Inc., Springfield, MA, 2003.

Templer, J.A., The Staircase: Studies of Hazards, Falls, and Safer Design, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992.


Major revisions to ASTM edition dates and AWPA standards from PI1.


16 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Related Public Comments for This Document

Related Comment Relationship

Public Comment No. 66-NFPA 5000-2016 [Chapter G]

Related Item

Public Input No. 1-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 2.3]


Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Action: Rejected but see related SR


Statement: Updates ASTM referenced publications.


17 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 96-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 2.3.3 ]

2.3.3 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive 130 E. Randolph St. , Suite 700 2000 , Chicago, IL 60601-1802 .

ANSI/AISC 341, Seismic Provisions for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.

ANSI/AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings, 2016.


This comment simply updates AISC's address.



Public Comment No. 112-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. G.1.2.2]

Related Item

First Revision No. 6039-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 2.3.3]


Submitter Full Name: Bonnie Manley

Organization: American Iron and Steel Instit

Affilliation: AISC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed May 11 12:16:47 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

Committee Action: Accepted


Statement: This comment simply updates AISC's address.


18 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 116-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 2.3.6 ]

TITLE OF NEW CONTENT

Type your content here ...

Add new reference standard in Chapter 2, Section 2.3.6:

ANSI/RESNA ED-1 Evacuation Devices Volume 1: Emergency Stair Travel Devices for Individuals with Disabilities ,2013

Statement:

This Public Comment is a re-introduction of Public Input No. 188-NFPA 5000-2015 (Section 2.3.6). A separate Public Comment hasbeen submitted at this time, addressing concerns of the committee regarding Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015. This proposedrevision would create the need for the abovementioned standard to be present in Section 2.3.6. ANSI/RESNA ED-1 : 2013 is anAmerican National Standard which introduces performance measures for emergency stair travel devices.


The addition of ANSI/RESNA ED-1:2013 is needed as a proposed revision to add Section 11.2.2.2.1.2 on Emergency Stair Travel Devices is being submitted.

This Public Comment is a re-introduction of Public Input No. 188-NFPA 5000-2015 (Section 2.3.6). A separate Public Comment has been submitted at this time (117), addressing concerns of the committee regarding Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015. This proposed revision would create the need for the abovementioned standard to be present in Section 2.3.6. ANSI/RESNA ED-1 : 2013 is an American National Standard which introduces performance measures for emergency stair travel devices.

Related Item

Public Input No. 188-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 2.3.5]


Submitter Full Name: Glenn Hedman

Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun May 15 21:18:11 EDT 2016

Committee Statement


Resolution: Associated comment on Chapter 11 was rejected.


19 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


2.3.7 ASCE Publications.


ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010 2016 , including Supplement1, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 8, Standard Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members, 201X 2017 .

ASCE/SEI 19, Structural Applications of Steel Cables for Buildings, 2016.


ASCE/SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural Fire Protection, 2016 2017 .

ASCE/SEI 41, Seismic Evaluation Rehabilitation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, 2017.

ASCE/SEI 55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures, 2016.


This comment corrects the titles and edition years of various ASCE publications to reflect the latest information. These changes to the titles should be carried throughout the entire document.



Public Comment No. 99-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 32.2.3.1]


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment corrects the titles and edition years of various ASCE publications to reflect the latest information. Thesechanges to the titles should be carried throughout the entire document.


20 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


2.3.8 ASHRAE Publications.

American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air Conditioning Engineers, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.


ASHRAE STD 55, Thermal Environmental Conditions for Human Occupancy, 2013, Errata 2015.

ASHRAE STD 62.1, Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, 2013, Errata 2014.

ASHRAE STD 90.1 IP, Energy Standard for Buildings Except Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2013, Errata 2014.

ASHRAE STD 90.2, Energy-Efficient Design of Low-Rise Residential Buildings, 2007, including approved addendum b.

ASHRAE STD 15 & 34, Safety Standard for Refrigeration Systems, 2015.


The problem with the 1st revision of the ASHRAE Standard 90.1 reference was the addition of the letters "IP". There is no need to specify the "IP" version of the document as it is available in both an IP (Inch/Pound) and SI (Metric) versions as separate documents. Other ASHRAE standards listed in this chapter are also available as two separate versions (e.g. IP and SI). However, since there was no need to specifically list them as IP or SI, we would submit there is no need to do so with ASHRAE Standard 90.1 either.

Therefore, we recommend that the "IP" be deleted so the user may determine which version is appropriate for the subject project (a project being designed and constructed using IP or metric).

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Jonathan Humble

Organization: American Iron and Steel Institute

Affilliation: American Iron and Steel Institute

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The problem with the 1st revision of the ASHRAE Standard 90.1 reference was the addition of the letters "IP". There is no needto specify the "IP" version of the document as it is available in both an IP (Inch/Pound) and SI (Metric) versions as separatedocuments. Other ASHRAE standards listed in this chapter are also available as two separate versions (e.g. IP and SI).However, since there was no need to specifically list them as IP or SI, we would submit there is no need to do so with ASHRAEStandard 90.1 either.

Therefore, we recommend that the "IP" be deleted so the user may determine which version is appropriate for the subjectproject (a project being designed and constructed using IP or metric).


21 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



22 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



23 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




ASTM A153/A153M, Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware, 2009.



ASTM A463/A463M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-Coated, by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010.

ASTM A572/A572M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Columbium-vanadium Structural Steel, 2013a.

ASTM A588/A588M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Structural Steel up to 50 ksi (345 MPa) Minimum Yield Point,with Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance, 2010.

ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) bythe Hot-Dip Process, 2013.


ASTM A706/A706M, Standard Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, 2014.


ASTM A792/A792M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, 55% Aluminum-Zinc Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010.





ASTM C28/C28M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Plasters, 2010.


ASTM C59/C59M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Casting Plaster and Gypsum Molding Plaster, 2000, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C61/C61M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Keenes Cement, 2000, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C90, Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, 2014.


ASTM C150/C150M, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, 2012.



ASTM C317/C317M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Concrete, 2000, reapproved 2010.

ASTM C406/C406M, Standard Specification for Roofing Slate, 2010.

ASTM C472, Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete, 1999 (2009).

ASTM C475/C475M, Standard Specification for Joint Compound and Joint Tape for Finishing Gypsum Board, 2002 (2007).



ASTM C552, Standard Specification for Cellular Glass Thermal Insulation, 2014.


ASTM C578, Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation, 2014a.



ASTM C591, Standard Specification for Unfaced Preformed Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation, 2013.

ASTM C595/C595M, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, 2014.


ASTM C645, Standard Specification for Nonstructural Steel Framing Members, 2014.

ASTM C726, Standard Specification for Mineral Fiber Roof Insulation Board, 2012.

ASTM C728, Standard Specification for Perlite Thermal Insulation Board, 2013.

ASTM C836/C836M, Standard Specification for High Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane forUse with Separate Wearing Course, 2012.



24 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


ASTM C842, Standard Specification for Application of Interior Gypsum Plaster, 2005 (2010)e1.


ASTM C844, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Base to Receive Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved 2010.

ASTM C847, Standard Specification for Metal Lath, 2014.


ASTM C897, Standard Specification for Aggregate for Job-Mixed Portland Cement-Based Plasters, 2005, reapproved 2014.


ASTM C926, Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement-Based Plaster, 2006.

ASTM C932, Standard Specification for Surface-Applied Bonding Compounds for Exterior Plastering, 2006, reaffirmed 2013.



ASTM C954, Standard Specification for Steel Drill Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or Metal Plaster Bases toSteel Studs from 0.033 in. (0.84 mm) to 0.112 in. (2.84 mm) in Thickness, 2011.

ASTM C955, Standard Specification for Load-Bearing (Transverse and Axial) Steel Studs, Runners (Tracks), and Bracing or Bridgingfor Screw Application of Gypsum Panel Products and Metal Plaster Bases, 2011c.

ASTM C956, Standard Specification for Installation of Cast-in-Place Reinforced Gypsum Concrete, Reapproved 2010.



ASTM C1029, Standard Specification for Spray-Applied Rigid Cellular Polyurethane Thermal Insulation, 2013.



ASTM C1063, Standard Specification for Installation of Lathing and Furring to Receive Interior and Exterior Portland Cement-BasedPlaster, 2014d.




ASTM C1278/C1278M, Standard Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Gypsum Panel, 2007a, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C 1280, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Sheathing, 2013a.

ASTM C 1289, Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board, 2014a.




ASTM C1492, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Tile, reapproved 2009.

ASTM C1629/C1629M, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels, 2014a.




ASTM D86, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure, 2012.

ASTM D225, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles (Organic Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2007.



ASTM D312, Standard Specification for Asphalt Used in Roofing, 2000 reapproved 2006.

ASTM D450/D450M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar Pitch Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2007 (2013)e1.


ASTM D1079, Standard Terminology Relating to Roofing, Waterproofing, and Bituminous Materials, 2013e1.

ASTM D1143/D1143M, Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load,2007, reapproved 2013.




25 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


ASTM D1929, Standard Test Method for Determining Ignition Temperature of Plastics, 2014.

ASTM D1970/D1970M, Standard Specification for Self-Adhering Polymer Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Used as SteepRoofing Underlayment for Ice Dam Protection, 2015.

ASTM D2178/D2178M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2014.




ASTM D2843, Standard Test Method for Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plastics, 2010 2016 .

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved2011 2016 .



ASTM D3161/D3161M, Standard Test Method for Wind-Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (Fan-Induced Method), 2014.






ASTM D3747, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Adhesive for Adhering Roof Insulation, 1979 (2007).




ASTM D4434/D4434M, Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) Sheet Roofing, 2012.




ASTM D4637/D4637M, Standard Specification for EPDM Sheet Used in a Single-Ply Roof Membrane, 2010 2014e1.

ASTM D4869/D4869M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Underlayment Used in Steep Slope Roofing, 2005(2011)e1.

ASTM D4897/D4897M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass-Fiber Venting Base Sheet Used in Roofing,2001,reapproved 2009.

ASTM D4990, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 1997a (2005)e1, reapproved 2011.





ASTM D5643, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Free, 2009.








26 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




ASTM D6298, Standard Specification for Fiberglass Reinforced Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet with aFactory Applied Metal Surface,2013.

ASTM D6305, Standard Practice for Calculating Bending Strength Design Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated PlywoodRoof Sheathing, 2008.


ASTM D6381/D6381M, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Asphalt Shingle Mechanical Uplift Resistance, 2008 (2013)e1.

ASTM D6694/D6694M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Silicone Coating Used in Spray Polyurethane Foam Roofing, 2008(2013)e1.

ASTM D6754/D6754M, Standard Specification for Ketone Ethylene Ester Based Sheet Roofing, 2010.


ASTM D6841, Standard Practice for Calculating Design Valve Treatment Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated Lumber,2008.


ASTM D7032, Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite Deck Boards and GuardrailSystems (Guards or Handrails), 2014 2015.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2015a 2015b .


ASTM E96/E96M, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, 2014.


ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C, 2012 2016 .

ASTM E492, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling AssembliesUsing the Tapping Machine, 2009.

ASTM E605, Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to StructuralMembers, 1993, reapproved 2011.

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c2015 e1 .

ASTM E736, Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members, 2000.reapproved 2011.







ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, , reapproved 2012.





ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-story Test Apparatus, 2015a.

ASTM E2393, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Resistive Joint Systems and Perimeter Fire Barriers, 2010a.


ASTM E2573, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Site-fabricated Stretch Systems to Assess Surface


27 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Burning Characteristics, 2012.

ASTM E 2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation , Radiant Barrier, and Vinyl StretchCeiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, 2015.

ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750Degrees C, 2012 2016 .






ASTM F1667, Standard Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes, and Staples, 2013.



date updates

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Marcelo Hirschler

Organization: GBH International

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Apr 29 19:54:55 EDT 2016

Committee Statement





28 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



29 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



30 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




ASTM A153/A153M, Standard Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware, 2009.



ASTM A463/A463M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Aluminum-Coated, by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010.

ASTM A572/A572M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Columbium-vanadium Structural Steel, 2013a.

ASTM A588/A588M, Standard Specification for High-strength Low-alloy Structural Steel up to 50 ksi (345 MPa) Minimum Yield Point,with Atmospheric Corrosion Resistance, 2010.

ASTM A653/A653M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, Zinc-Coated (Galvanized) or Zinc-Iron Alloy-Coated (Galvannealed) bythe Hot-Dip Process, 2013.


ASTM A706/A706M, Standard Specification for Low-Alloy Steel Deformed and Plain Bars for Concrete Reinforcement, 2014.


ASTM A792/A792M, Standard Specification for Steel Sheet, 55% Aluminum-Zinc Alloy-Coated by the Hot-Dip Process, 2010.





ASTM C28/C28M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Plasters, 2010.


ASTM C59/C59M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Casting Plaster and Gypsum Molding Plaster, 2000, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C61/C61M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Keenes Cement, 2000, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C90, Standard Specification for Loadbearing Concrete Masonry Units, 2014.


ASTM C150/C150M, Standard Specification for Portland Cement, 2012.



ASTM C317/C317M, Standard Specification for Gypsum Concrete, 2000, reapproved 2010.

ASTM C406/C406M, Standard Specification for Roofing Slate, 2010.

ASTM C472, Standard Test Methods for Physical Testing of Gypsum, Gypsum Plasters and Gypsum Concrete, 1999 (2009).

ASTM C475/C475M, Standard Specification for Joint Compound and Joint Tape for Finishing Gypsum Board, 2002 (2007).



ASTM C552, Standard Specification for Cellular Glass Thermal Insulation, 2014.


ASTM C578, Standard Specification for Rigid, Cellular Polystyrene Thermal Insulation, 2014a.



ASTM C591, Standard Specification for Unfaced Preformed Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation, 2013.

ASTM C595/C595M, Standard Specification for Blended Hydraulic Cements, 2014.


ASTM C645, Standard Specification for Nonstructural Steel Framing Members , 2014.ASTM C726, Standard Specification forMineral Fiber Roof Insulation Board, 2012.

ASTM C728, Standard Specification for Perlite Thermal Insulation Board, 2013.

ASTM C836/C836M, Standard Specification for High Solids Content, Cold Liquid-Applied Elastomeric Waterproofing Membrane forUse with Separate Wearing Course, 2012.




31 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM C842, Standard Specification for Application of Interior Gypsum Plaster, 2005 (2010)e1.


ASTM C844, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Base to Receive Gypsum Veneer Plaster, 2004, reapproved 2010.

ASTM C847, Standard Specification for Metal Lath, 2014.


ASTM C897, Standard Specification for Aggregate for Job-Mixed Portland Cement-Based Plasters, 2005, reapproved 2014.


ASTM C926, Standard Specification for Application of Portland Cement-Based Plaster, 2006.

ASTM C932, Standard Specification for Surface-Applied Bonding Compounds for Exterior Plastering, 2006, reaffirmed 2013.



ASTM C954, Standard Specification for Steel Drill Screws for the Application of Gypsum Panel Products or Metal Plaster Bases toSteel Studs from 0.033 in. (0.84 mm) to 0.112 in. (2.84 mm) in Thickness, 2011.

ASTM C955, Standard Specification for Load-Bearing (Transverse and Axial) Steel Studs, Runners (Tracks), and Bracing or Bridgingfor Screw Application of Gypsum Panel Products and Metal Plaster Bases , 2011c.ASTM C956, Standard Specification for Installationof Cast-in-Place Reinforced Gypsum Concrete, Reapproved 2010.



ASTM C1029, Standard Specification for Spray-Applied Rigid Cellular Polyurethane Thermal Insulation, 2013.



ASTM C1063, Standard Specification for Installation of Lathing and Furring to Receive Interior and Exterior Portland Cement-BasedPlaster, 2014d.




ASTM C1278/C1278M, Standard Specification for Fiber-Reinforced Gypsum Panel, 2007a, reapproved 2011.

ASTM C 1280, Standard Specification for Application of Gypsum Sheathing, 2013a.

ASTM C 1289, Standard Specification for Faced Rigid Cellular Polyisocyanurate Thermal Insulation Board, 2014a.




ASTM C1492, Standard Specification for Concrete Roof Tile, reapproved 2009.

ASTM C1629/C1629M, Standard Classification for Abuse-Resistant Nondecorated Interior Gypsum Panel Products and Fiber-Reinforced Cement Panels, 2014a.





ASTM D225, Standard Specification for Asphalt Shingles (Organic Felt) Surfaced with Mineral Granules, 2007.



ASTM D312, Standard Specification for Asphalt Used in Roofing, 2000 reapproved 2006.

ASTM D450/D450M, Standard Specification for Coal-Tar Pitch Used in Roofing, Dampproofing, and Waterproofing, 2007 (2013)e1.


ASTM D1079, Standard Terminology Relating to Roofing, Waterproofing, and Bituminous Materials, 2013e1.

ASTM D1143/D1143M, Standard Test Methods for Deep Foundations Under Static Axial Compressive Load,2007, reapproved 2013.




ASTM D1929, Standard Test Method for Determining Ignition Temperature of Plastics, 2014.


32 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

ASTM D1970/D1970M, Standard Specification for Self-Adhering Polymer Modified Bituminous Sheet Materials Used as SteepRoofing Underlayment for Ice Dam Protection, 2015.

ASTM D2178/D2178M, Standard Specification for Asphalt Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 2014.




ASTM D2843, Standard Test Method for Density of Smoke from the Burning or Decomposition of Plastics, 2010.

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved 2011.



ASTM D3161/D3161M, Standard Test Method for Wind-Resistance of Asphalt Shingles (Fan-Induced Method), 2014.






ASTM D3747, Standard Specification for Emulsified Asphalt Adhesive for Adhering Roof Insulation, 1979 (2007).




ASTM D4434/D4434M, Standard Specification for Poly (Vinyl Chloride) Sheet Roofing, 2012.




ASTM D4637/D4637M, Standard Specification for EPDM Sheet Used in a Single-Ply Roof Membrane, 2010 2014e1.

ASTM D4869/D4869M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Saturated Organic Felt Underlayment Used in Steep Slope Roofing, 2005(2011)e1.

ASTM D4897/D4897M, Standard Specification for Asphalt-Coated Glass-Fiber Venting Base Sheet Used in Roofing,2001,reapproved 2009.

ASTM D4990, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Glass Felt Used in Roofing and Waterproofing, 1997a (2005)e1, reapproved 2011.





ASTM D5643, Standard Specification for Coal Tar Roof Cement, Asbestos Free, 2009.










33 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


ASTM D6298, Standard Specification for Fiberglass Reinforced Styrene-Butadiene-Styrene (SBS) Modified Bituminous Sheet with aFactory Applied Metal Surface,2013.

ASTM D6305, Standard Practice for Calculating Bending Strength Design Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated PlywoodRoof Sheathing, 2008.


ASTM D6381/D6381M, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Asphalt Shingle Mechanical Uplift Resistance, 2008 (2013)e1.

ASTM D6694/D6694M, Standard Specification for Liquid-Applied Silicone Coating Used in Spray Polyurethane Foam Roofing, 2008(2013)e1.

ASTM D6754/D6754M, Standard Specification for Ketone Ethylene Ester Based Sheet Roofing, 2010.


ASTM D6841, Standard Practice for Calculating Design Valve Treatment Adjustment Factors for Fire-Retardant-Treated Lumber,2008.


ASTM D7032, Standard Specification for Establishing Performance Ratings for Wood-Plastic Composite Deck Boards and GuardrailSystems (Guards or Handrails), 2014

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2015a.




ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2014.

ASTM E136, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Vertical Tube Furnace at 750°C, 2012.

ASTM E492, Standard Test Method for Laboratory Measurement of Impact Sound Transmission Through Floor-Ceiling AssembliesUsing the Tapping Machine, 2009.

ASTM E605, Standard Test Methods for Thickness and Density of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Material (SFRM) Applied to StructuralMembers, 1993, reapproved 2011.

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor-Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c.

ASTM E736, Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members, 2000.reapproved 2011.







ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, , reapproved 2012.





ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-story Test Apparatus, 2015a.



ASTM E2573, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Site-fabricated Stretch Systems to Assess SurfaceBurning Characteristics, 2012.

ASTM E 2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation , Radiant Barrier, and Vinyl StretchCeiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, 2015.

ASTM E2652, Standard Test Method for Behavior of Materials in a Tube Furnace with a Cone-shaped Airflow Stabilizer, at 750Degrees C, 2012.


34 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281






ASTM F1667, Standard Specification for Driven Fasteners: Nails, Spikes, and Staples, 2013.



First Revision 7529 deleted the only occurrences of ASTM C645 and ASTM C955 in NFPA 5000. Therefore, both should be eliminated from this list.

Related Item

First Revision No. 7529-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 47.2.1.4.4]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement





35 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


2.3.19 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919-4923.

FM Approval 4411, Insulated Wall Constructions, 1974.

FM Approval 4435, Edge Systems Used with Low Slope Roofing Systems, 2013.

FM Approval 4450, Class I Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

FM Approval 4470, Single-Ply, Polymer-modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Covers for use in ClassI and Non-combustible Roof Deck Construction, 2010 2012 .


ANSI/ FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer Ice Balls,2011.

ANSI/ FM Approval 4474, Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positiveand/or Negative Differential Pressures, 2010 2011 .

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials, or Coatings andExterior Wall Systems , 2010 Building Panels or Interior Finsih Materials , 2015 .


Update FM Global References

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: John Harrington

Organization: Fm Global

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Update FM Global References.

Editorial correction.


36 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


2.3.32 SJI Publications.

Steel Joist Institute, 234 W. Cheves Street, Florence, SC 29501.

SJI CJ -200 , Standard Specifications for Composite Steel Joist, CJ-Series, 2015 2016 .

SJI-100, Standard Specification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders, 2015.


This comment corrects the title of SJI-100 to reflect the published document. Additionally, it updates the new title and edition year for the composite joist standard to SJI-200, 2016. Modifications in the 2015 edition of SJI-200 compared to previously adopted version include the following:• Rewriting the welding (shop, assembly) section to follow AWS D1.1, D1.3 with Section 6.8 Acceptance Criteria• Updating K factors for web and bottom chord• Requiring Q for all crimped angles at first bottom chord panel point• Adding erection stability equations• Adding single, rotated, uncrimped angle equations• Adding modified slenderness ratio check• Updating joint eccentricity section• Updating reference list• Clarifying the composite slab height variable, “a” vs. “A”• Removing a statement regarding ignoring the top chord compositely• Fixing a circular logic issue with the moment equation• Clarifying the minimum 50% composite action



Public Comment No. 95-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 44.4]

Public Comment No. 106-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 35.1.2.8.3]

Related Item





Affilliation: SJI

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment corrects the title of SJI-100 to reflect the published document. Additionally, it updates the new title and editionyear for the composite joist standard to SJI-200, 2016. Modifications in the 2015 edition of SJI-200 compared to previouslyadopted version include the following:

• Rewriting the welding (shop, assembly) section to follow AWS D1.1, D1.3 with Section 6.8 Acceptance Criteria

• Updating K factors for web and bottom chord

• Requiring Q for all crimped angles at first bottom chord panel point

• Adding erection stability equations

• Adding single, rotated, uncrimped angle equations


37 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

• Adding modified slenderness ratio check

• Updating joint eccentricity section

• Updating reference list

• Clarifying the composite slab height variable, “a” vs. “A”

• Removing a statement regarding ignoring the top chord compositely

• Fixing a circular logic issue with the moment equation

• Clarifying the minimum 50% composite action


38 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


3.3.33 Animal Housing Facility.

Area of a building or structure, including interior and adjacent exterior spaces, where animals are fed, rested, worked, exercised,treated, exhibited, or used for production. [150, 2015] (BLD-FUN)





NOTE: This Public Comment appear as Correlating Note No. 1 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) to review the definition of Animal Housing Facility in new3.3.33 and consider adding Annex language as follows: A.3.3.33 Animal Housing FacilityAnimal housing facilities, as used in this Code, are subject to local, state, or federal licensing or permitting requirements, and include –but are not limited to –the following:

(1) Barns and stables

(2) Kennels

(3) Racetrack stable/kennel areas including those stable/kennel areas, barns, and associated buildings at state, county, and local fairgrounds

(4) Animal shelters

(5) Animal hospitals and veterinary facilities

(6) Zoos and special amusement parks

(7) Laboratories

(8) Agricultural facilities

(9) Mercantile or business occupancies with animalsLanguage is consistent with Annex language added to definition in NFPA 101. This action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 1-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 3.3.32]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appear as Correlating Note No. 1 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directsthe TC on Fundamentals (FUN) to review the definition of Animal Housing Facility in new

3.3.33 and consider adding Annex language as follows: A.3.3.33 Animal Housing Facility

Animal housing facilities, as used in this Code, are subject to local, state, or federal licensing or permitting requirements, andinclude –but are not limited to –the following:


39 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


(2) Kennels

(3) Racetrack stable/kennel areas including those stable/kennel areas, barns, and associated buildings at state, county, andlocal fairgrounds

(4) Animal shelters



(7) Laboratories


(9) Mercantile or business occupancies with animals

Language is consistent with Annex language added to definition in NFPA 101. This action will be considered as a publiccomment.


40 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 1-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.32 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) to review the definition of Animal Housing Facility in new3.3.33 and consider adding Annex language as follows:

A.3.3.33 Animal Housing Facility

Animal housing facilities, as used in this Code, are subject to local, state, or federal licensing or permitting requirements, andinclude –but are not limited to –the following:


(2) Kennels

(3) Racetrack stable/kennel areas including those stable/kennel areas, barns, and associated buildings at state, county, andlocal fairgrounds

(4) Animal shelters



(7) Laboratories


(9) Mercantile or business occupancies with animals

Language is consistent with Annex language added to definition in NFPA 101.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:46 PM

of 281

Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:46 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 5-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 3.3.150 ]



5000_CCN_3.pdf 5000 CC Note No. 3


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 3 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots of Pappas to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows. Suggested revision was made for 101, should be consistent for 5000.

Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing. (SAF-MEA)


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: The SR incorporates the revision requested by the CC via PC-5.


41 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballots ofPappas to revise the definition by combining the two sentences to read as follows. Suggested revision was made for 101, shouldbe consistent for 5000.

Delayed Action Closer. Mechanical self-closing device that incorporates an adjustable delay prior to the initiation of closing.(SAF-MEA)


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:47 PM

of 281


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 6-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.445.1 ]

3.3.445.1* Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy.

An occupancy used to provide services or treatment simultaneously to four or more patients that provides, on an outpatient basis,one or more of the following: (1) treatment for patients that renders the patients incapable of taking action for self-preservation underemergency conditions without the assistance of others; (2) anesthesia that renders the patients incapable of taking action forself-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance of others; (3) treatment for patients who, due to the nature oftheir injury or illness, are incapable of taking action for self-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance ofothers. (BLD-HEA)





NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 4 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Healthcare to consider undoing the changes made to the definition of Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy and revise Annex language for consistency with NFPA 101. The proposed change was intended for the annex text, not to the definition of ambulatory health care occupancy.


An occupancy used to provide services or treatment simultaneously to four or more patients that provides, on an outpatient basis, one or more of the following: (1) treatment for patients that renders the patients incapable of taking action for self-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance of others; (2) anesthesia that renders the patients incapable of taking action forself-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance of others; (3) emergency or urgent care for patients who, due to the nature of their injury or illness, are incapable of taking action for self-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance of others. (BLD-HEA)

A.3.3.445.1 Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy.

It is not the intent that occupants be considered to be incapable of self-preservation just because they are in a wheelchair or use assistive walking devices, such as a cane, a walker, or crutches. Rather, it is the intent to address treatment centers that receive patients who have been rendered incapable of self-preservation due to the emergency, such as being rendered unconscious as a result of an accident or being unable to move due to sudden illness.

It is not the intent that the term anesthesia be limited to general anesthesia.

Reason: The labels "emergency" and "urgent" are not needed. The key is that treatment is provided to those who arrive incapable of self preservation.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 4-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 3.3.443.1]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Mar 04 10:55:20 EST 2016

Committee Statement


Resolution: NFPA 101 definition revised via 101-SR-4004 to match NFPA 5000 definition.


42 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 4-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 3.3.443.1 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Healthcare to consider undoing the changes made to the definition of AmbulatoryHealth Care Occupancy and revise Annex language for consistency with NFPA 101. The proposed change was intended for theannex text, not to the definition of ambulatory health care occupancy.


An occupancy used to provide services or treatment simultaneously to four or more patients that provides, on an outpatient basis,one or more of the following: (1) treatment for patients that renders the patients incapable of taking action for self-preservation underemergency conditions without the assistance of others; (2) anesthesia that renders the patients incapable of taking action forself-preservation under emergency conditions without the assistance of others; (3) emergency or urgent care for patients who, dueto the nature of their injury or illness, are incapable of taking action for self-preservation under emergency conditions without theassistance of others. (BLD-HEA)

A.3.3.445.1 Ambulatory Health Care Occupancy.

It is not the intent that occupants be considered to be incapable of self-preservation just because they are in a wheelchair or useassistive walking devices, such as a cane, a walker, or crutches. Rather, it is the intent to address treatment centers that receivepatients who have been rendered incapable of self-preservation due to the emergency, such as being rendered unconscious as aresult of an accident or being unable to move due to sudden illness.

It is not the intent that the term anesthesia be limited to general anesthesia.

Reason: The labels "emergency" and "urgent" are not needed. The key is that treatment is provided to those who arrive incapable ofself preservation.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:50 PM

of 281

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:50 PM

of 281


3.3.682.1 Public Way.

A street, alley, or other similar parcel of land essentially open to the outside air deeded, dedicated, or otherwise permanentlyappropriated to the public for public use and having a clear width and height of not less than 10 ft (3050 mm). (BLD-MEA)


This comment does is not recommending any change to the definition. The BCDC wants to comment that as drafted, CI 6032 would remove text that is an important part of the definition. The text that the CI identified as deleting is essential to the definition of “public way” because it is the part that refers to the “public” aspect of a “public way.”

Related Item

Committee Input No. 6032-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 3.3.677.1]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: The SR clarifies the intent of the public way via new A.3.3.682.1.


43 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


4.4.1 * Multiple Safeguards.

The design of every building or structure intended for human occupancy shall be such that reliance for property protection and safetyto life does not depend solely on any single safeguard. An additional safeguard(s) shall be provided for property protection and lifesafety in case any single safeguard is ineffective due to inappropriate human actions, building failure, or systemfailure rendered ineffective .


This comment eliminates the laundry list and subjectivity of the term “inappropriate.” The redundancy of safeguards is desirable in case one fails. The Manual of Style Table 2.2.2.3 lists possible unenforceable and vague terms, which includes the term “appropriate” and thus “inappropriate.”

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment eliminates the laundry list and subjectivity of the term “inappropriate.” The redundancy of safeguards isdesirable in case one fails. The Manual of Style Table 2.2.2.3 lists possible unenforceable and vague terms, which includesthe term “appropriate” and thus “inappropriate.”


44 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


4.5.5.4

Where required by Chapters 15 through 31 and 33, construction, alteration, and demolition operations shall comply with NFPA 241.





NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 5 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy Technical Committees to consider reviewing new Section 4.5.5.4 and consider for addition in their respective chapters correlative language to reference NFPA 241. The language would read as follows:

XX.1.1.6 Where construction, alteration, or demolition operations are conducted, the provisions of 4.5.5.4 shall apply.

These action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 5-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 4.5.5.3]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Occupancy chapter TC responses follow: END – No action needed. Chapter 14 of NFPA 5000 addresses safeguards duringbuilding construction, which also references NFPA 241. // IND - No action needed. Chapter 14 of NFPA 5000 addressessafeguards during building construction, which also references NFPA 241. // MER - No action needed. Chapter 14 of NFPA5000 addresses safeguards during building construction, which also references NFPA 241. // BCF - The committee on Boardand Care reviewed the suggestion from the CC on adding language to reference NFPA 241. The requirements in 241 do notapply to board and care facilities. No SRs were created. // RES - (No response - PC omitted from RES agenda) // AXM - See5000-SR-2. // HEA - (No response - PC omitted from HEA agenda) // DET - See SR-5000-2501.


45 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 5-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 4.5.5.3 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy Technical Committees to consider reviewing new Section 4.5.5.4 andconsider for addition in their respective chapters correlative language to reference NFPA 241. The language would read asfollows:

XX.1.1.6 Where construction, alteration, or demolition operations are conducted, the provisions of 4.5.5.4 shall apply.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:51 PM

of 281


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:51 PM

of 281


6.2.1.5

Where minor accessory uses functions of an occupancy do not occupy more than 25 percent of the area of any floor of a building,nor more than the basic area permitted for the occupancy by 7.4.2 for such minor use, for the purpose of determining permitted area,the principal use of the accessory functions, the predominant function of the building shall determine the occupancy classification forthe purpose of determining allowable area .


This comment clarifies a confusing provision in the code. Additionally, the term “use” is defined twice in Chapter 3.3.666, neither of which is applicable in this section. So, this comment rewords the provision to eliminate the term "use."

Related Item

Public Input No. 116-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 6.2.1.5]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The committee stands on its response to PI-116.


46 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 118-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 6.2.4.1.1 ]


47 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

6.2.4.1.1


48 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Separation of occupancies having high hazard contents shall also be in accordance with 34.3.2.3 and 34.2.5.2, except as otherwisepermitted by 6.2.4.7.

Table 6.2.4.1.1(a) Required Fire Resistance–Rated Separations for Separated Occupancies (hr)†, Part 1

OccupancyAssembly

≤300

Assembly>300 to ≤

1000Assembly

>1000 Educational

DayCare >

12Clients

Day-CareHomes

HealthCare

AmbulatoryHealthCare

Detentionand

Correctional

One- andTwo-

FamilyDwellings

Lod

RooHo

Assembly≤300

0 0 2 2 2 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Assembly>300 to≤1000

0 2 2 2 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Assembly>1000

2 2 2 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Educational 2 2 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Day Care>12 Clients

1 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Day-CareHomes 2‡ 2 2‡ 2

Health Care 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2

AmbulatoryHealth Care 2‡ 2

DetentionandCorrectional

2‡ 2

One- andTwo-FamilyDwellings

Lodging orRoomingHouses

† Minimum Fire Resistance Rating. The fire resistance rating is permitted to be reduced by 1 hour, but in no case to less than 1 hour,where the building is protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 55.3.1.1 (1) andelectrically supervised in accordance with 55.3.2.

‡ The 1-hour reduction due to the presence of sprinklers in accordance with the double-dagger footnote is not permitted.

Table 6.2.4.1.1(b) Required Fire Resistance–Rated Separations for Separated Occupancies (hr)†, Part 2

OccupancyHotels andDormitories

ApartmentBuildings

Boardand

Care,Small

Boardand

Care,Large Mercantile

Mercantile,Covered

MallConcourse

Mercantile,Bulk Retail Business

Industrial,Low

Hazard Industrial

StoragLow

Hazar

Assembly≤300

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 2

Assembly>300 to≤1000

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

Assembly>1000

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

Educational 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2

Day Care>12 Clients

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2

Day-CareHomes

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2

Health Care 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 3 2‡ 2‡ 3 2‡

AmbulatoryHealth Care

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 1 2 3 2

DetentionandCorrectional

2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 2‡ 3 3 2‡ 3 2‡


49 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

OccupancyHotels andDormitories

ApartmentBuildings

Boardand

Care,Small

Boardand

Care,Large Mercantile

Mercantile,Covered

MallConcourse

Mercantile,Bulk Retail Business

Industrial,Low

Hazard Industrial

StoragLow

Hazar

One- andTwo-FamilyDwellings

2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

Lodging orRoomingHouses

2 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

Hotels andDormitories

2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

ApartmentBuildings

2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 2

Board andCare, Small

1 2 2 3 2 3 3 2

Board andCare, Large

2 2 3 2 3 3 2

Mercantile 0 3 2 2 2 2

Mercantile,CoveredMallConcourse

3 2 3 3 2

Mercantile,Bulk Retail

2 3 3 2

Business 2 2 2

Industrial,Low Hazard

0 1

Industrial 1

Storage,Low Hazard

Storage

† Minimum Fire Resistance Rating. The fire resistance rating is permitted to be reduced by 1 hour, but in no case to less than 1 hour,where the building is protected throughout by an approved automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 55.3.1.1 (1) andelectrically supervised in accordance with 55.3.2.

‡ The 1-hour reduction due to the presence of sprinklers in accordance with the double-dagger footnote is not permitted.


The Terra System may not be showing clearly the proposed changes in the educational facilities column well enough to be fully understood. (I have had problems with marking up tabulated content in the past and hopefully this has been fixed)

From what can be seen, however, the concept of identifying scalable possibilities for fire separation for educational facilities is solid. The occupancy characteristics of K-12 square-footage diverges fairly from the occupancy characteristics of square-footage in colleges and universities instructional space. Perhaps in the next revision the concept of “non-simulanteous use” can be more fully explored and articulated more broadly across the entire NFPA suite. Our concern, of course, is over-building fire resistance/fire walls as more robust methods of exiting a building with information and communications technology roll out.

Wherever possible, correlation with I-Codes is also welcomed.

Related Item

Public Input No. 118-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 6.2.4.1.1]


Submitter Full Name: Michael Anthony

Organization: University of Michigan

Affilliation: University of Michigan Plant Operations

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



50 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Committee Statement


Resolution: Comment contains no revision. See response to PI-118.


51 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


7.1.4.2* Limited-Combustible Material.

A material shall be considered a limited-combustible material where both of the following conditions of 7.1.4.2 (1), and 7.1.4.2 (2),and the conditions of either 7.1.4.2.1 or 7.1.4.2.2 are met:

(1) The material does not comply with the requirements for a noncombustible material in accordance with 7.1.4.1.

(2) The material, in the form in which it is used, exhibits a potential heat value not exceeding 3500 Btu/lb (8141 kJ/kg), when testedin accordance with NFPA 259.

7.1.4.2.1

The material shall have a structural base of noncombustible material with a surfacing not exceeding a thickness of 1⁄8 in. (3.2 mm)where the surfacing exhibits a flame spread index not greater than 50 when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard TestMethod for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics ofBuilding Materials.

7.1.4.2.2

The material shall be composed of materials that in the form and thickness used, neither exhibit a flame spread index greater than 25nor evidence of continued progressive combustion when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 and are of such compositionthat all surfaces that would be exposed by cutting through the material on any plane would neither exhibit a flame spread indexgreater than 25 nor exhibit evidence of continued progressive combustion when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723.

7.1.4.2.3

An alternate approach for a material to be considered a limited combustible material is where the material is tested in accordancewith ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Using an

Oxygen Combustion Calorimeter at an incident heat flux of 75 kW/m 2 for a 20 minute exposure and: (a) the peak heat relase rate

does not exceed 150 kW/m 2 for longer than 10 seconds and (b) the total heat released does not exceed 8 MJ/m 2 .

7.1.4.2.4

Where the term limited-combustible is used in this Code, it shall also include the term noncombustible.

(Also, add ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Using anOxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2016, into chapter 2 on referenced ASTM standards)



Tables_showing_test_results.docx Test results from study by Urbas 2002

Tables_showing_test_results_Janssens.docx Test results from Carpenter and Janssens 2005

NFPA_500_PI_66_2016_on_limited_combustible_with_response.pdf Public input


The technical committee has stated that it agreed in concept with the approach but that it would like to see more data and would consider a lower heat release rate threshold. I attach information on tests conducted on a variety of materials with the equipment (and with slight variations in testing which will not make a significant difference for limited combustible materials).

The proposed test (ASTM E2965) is a variation of the cone calorimeter (ASTM E1354) with a much larger test specimen (150 mm x 150 mm instead of 100 mm x 100 mm), a larger radiant heat source and a slower duct flow rate. This test has been developed specifically to identify materials that are of very low levels of heat release. If a material has very low levels of heat release it will have very low levels of combustibility. The scope of ASTM E2965 includes the following: "This test method differs from ASTM E1354 in that it prescribes a different specific test specimen size, specimen holder, test specimen orientation, and volumetric flow rate for analyses via oxygen consumption calorimetry. It is intended for use on materials and products that contain only small amounts of combustible ingredients or components e.g. test specimens that yield a total heat release of less than 15 MJ/m2." The significance and use states as follows: "This test method is used primarily to determine the heat evolved in, or contributed to, a fire involving materials or products that emit low levels of heat release. The recommended use for this test method is for materials with a total heat release rate measured of less than 10 MJ over the first 20 min test period, and which do not give peak heat release rates of more than 200kW/m2 for periods extending more than 10 seconds. Also included is a determination of the effective heat of combustion, mass loss rate, the time to sustained flaming, and (optionally) smoke production. These properties are determined on small size test specimens that are representative of those in the intended end use. "

In this public comment I also propose a lower threshold, of 150 kW/m2, as this would be the first cycle where the proposed approach would be used. I don't want to repeat all the information provided earlier, during the public input, as this information is clearly already available to the committee. Please note that this is not intended to replace the NFPA 259 test for the assessment of limited combustibility but is an alternate approach and will, thus, have no influence on any material or product assessed in the traditional way in the past.

Information in terms of the abstract from a study made with the cone calorimeter before developing ASTM E2965 by J. Urbas (2002) and from a follow-up study by M. Janssens and K. Carpenter (2005) follows.


52 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Attached tables from Urbas indicate that (out of 16 materials assessed) 1 material would qualify easily under the criteria shown, namely SPRF (sprayed fire resistant material on non-combustible backing), and that 5/8" Type X Gypsum Board would most likely qualify (in 3 out of 4 labs) while several other materials would fail primarily on total heat released (the most severe property). On the other hand paper-faced glass wool would fail on peak heat release rate and not on total heat released.

Attached tables from Carpenter & Janssens (one of the labs used by the Urbas study) indicates similar types of results as above.This shows that the criteria used are consistent with what would happen for limited combustible materials under the present criteria and that nothing unacceptable would "sneak" in. The data in the attached tables was taken at exposures to 75 kW/m2 for 20 min, just like the proposed new criteria.

BDMC interlaboratory cone calorimeter test programme by Joe Urbas (Fire Mater. 2002; 26: 29–35)

Abstract: In the spring of 1997, seven companies and industry associations from the USA and Canada decided to sponsor the cone calorimeter interlaboratory test programme. Reproducibility and repeatability were determined for the scalar variables measured in the cone calorimeter (ASTM E1354) according to the protocol developed by the Board for the Coordination of the Model Codes. The main requirement of the protocol was that the sample irradiance should be 75kW/m2. The purpose of the project was to assist the model building code organizations, NFPA and various other groups in the development of a system to determine degrees of combustibility of building materials. Three US and one Canadian laboratory agreed to conduct tests on 16 materials.The results of this round robin show that the cone calorimeter, following the Board for the Coordination of the Model Codes protocol, can provide precision similar to that cited in the current cone calorimeter standards. It is recommended that further improvements of the standards are pursued and provisions are made to improve the quality of operation of the cone calorimeter in commercial laboratories to maintain and possibly improve its repeatability and reproducibility.

Using Heat Release Rate to Assess Combustibility of Building Products in the Cone Calorimeter by Karen Carpenter and Marc Janssens (Fire Technology 41 – 79-92, 2005)

Abstract: Building codes generally permit unlimited use of materials that contribute negligible quantities of heat in the event of a fire. These materials are referred to as non-combustible. Whether a material qualifies as being non-combustible is generally based on performance in a small-scale furnace test, or on its potential heat content measured in an oxygen bomb calorimeter. However, furnace and oxygen bomb methods to assess combustibility have serious limitations. The most significant limitations are that materials cannot be evaluated in their end use configuration, that test conditions are not representative of real fire exposure conditions, and that the test results do not provide a realistic measure of the expected heat release rate.These limitations lead to the idea of exploring the use of small-scale heat release calorimeters to assess material combustibility. The Cone Calorimeter has emerged in recent years as the most widely used apparatus for this application.In this paper, an overview is presented of past efforts to assess combustibility based on heat release rate measurements. The main results of the most recent Cone Calorimeter round robin conducted in North America are discussed. It is concluded from the results of this round robin that the Cone Calorimeter is indeed suitable for measuring heat release rate from materials and products with low heat content. Limitations due to Cone Calorimeter specimen size can be alleviated by using a larger calorimeter, such as the Intermediate Scale Calorimeter or ICAL (ASTM E 1623.) However, more research is needed to extend the correlation between Cone Calorimeter and ICAL data to a wider range of materials. The biggest challenge is perhaps the implementation of a system to assess combustibility on the basis of heat release rate in the building codes. Implementation could consist of a classification system that is accepted as an alternative to the present prescriptive requirements and/or promoting the use of heat release rate data in performance-based design.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The committee agrees with the substantiation provided in PC 60.

Note to BLD-AAC:

Add ASTM E2965, Standard Test for Determination of Low Levels of Heat Release Rate for Materials and Products Using anOxygen Consumption Calorimeter, 2016, into chapter 2 on referenced ASTM standards


53 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


7.2.5.6.8 Exterior Nonbearing Walls.

Exterior nonbearing walls shall be permitted when tested in accordance with, and meeting the conditions of acceptance of, either oneof the following:

(1) NFPA 285

(2) FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials or Coatingsand Exterior Wall Systems





NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 7 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Construction (BLC) to do the following:

1. Consider the affirmative with comment ballot of Davis and revise 7.2.5.6.8 as follows: (2) ANSI/FM Approval 4880…2. Consider the affirmative with comment ballot of Koffel relative to the application of the requirements to Type I, II, and IIIconstruction and to clarify the intent of the text with regards to its application to all nonbearing exterior walls.

3. Consider the negative votes of Molina, Alfawakiri, Dubrowski, and Woods relative to FM 4880 being an appropriate alternative to NFPA 285.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 7-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 7.2.5.6.8]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: Recent construction techniques involving the use of heavy timber structural members have been designed and built globally.Many of these designs have exceeded traditional height limits (four-five stories) and have been completed using performancebased design or equivalency processes. The committee input is intended to introduce revised height limits for such structuralmembers. In addition, FPRF released a Phase 1 study on feasibility of tall timber structures in March 2014. This study capturedthe potential benefits, hazards, and concerns with this construction technique. Public comments on this concept areencouraged.

The following substantiation relates to 7.2.5.6.8:

- There is no window opening in FM 4880, thus it does not challenge the opening space between the window space and thewall

- The fire test does not simultaneously expose both sides of the same wall assembly unless it is symmetrical.

- This is not a national consensus standard.


54 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 7-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 7.2.5.6.8 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Construction (BLD) to do the following:

1. Consider the affirmative with comment ballot of Davis and revise 7.2.5.6.8 as follows:

(2) ANSI/FM Approval 4880…

2. Consider the affirmative with comment ballot of Koffel relative to the application of the requirements to Type I, II, and IIIconstruction and to clarify the intent of the text with regards to its application to all nonbearing exterior walls.

3. Consider the negative votes of Molina, Alfawakiri, Dubrowski, and Woods relative to FM 4880 being an appropriate alternativeto NFPA 285.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:51 PM

of 281

Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:51 PM

of 281


7.4.3.6.8 Open Parking Structure Beneath Other Occupancies.

7.4.3.6.8.1 Limitations.

(A)

Open parking structures constructed under other occupancies shall not exceed the height and area limitations permitted under30.8.1.6.

(B)

The height of the portion of the building above the open parking structure shall not exceed the limitations in Section 7.4 for the upperoccupancy.

(C)

The height, in both feet and stories, of the portion of the building above the open parking structure shall be measured from gradeplane and shall include both the open parking structure and the portion of the building above the parking structure.

7.4.3.6.8.2 Fire Separation.

Fire separation assemblies between the parking occupancy and the upper occupancy shall correspond to the required fire resistancerating prescribed in Table 6.2.4.1.1(a) and Table 6.2.4.1.1(b) for the uses involved.

7.4.3.6.8.3 Type of Construction.

The type of construction used shall apply to each occupancy individually, except that structural members, including main bracingwithin the open parking structure, that are necessary to support the upper occupancy shall be provided with the more restrictive fireresistance ratings of the use groups involved, as shown in Table 7.2.1.1.

7.4.3.6.8.4 Means of Egress.

Means of egress for the upper occupancy shall conform to Chapter 11 and shall be separated from the parking occupancy by firebarriers having at least a 2-hour fire resistance rating, with self-closing doors in accordance with 8.7.2.

Delete the following section:

7.4.3.6.9 Height of New Hotels and New Apartment Buildings of Mass Timber

The height limitation for New Hotels and New Apartment Buildings of Type IV construction shall be permitted to be increased to ninestories and 100 feet (30 480 mm) where the building is separated by not less than 50 feet (15 240 mm) from any other building on thelot and from adjacent lot lines or lot lines on the opposite sides of public streets, provided all of the following are met:

1. All load bearing structural elements shall be heavy timber complying with Sections 7.2.5.1; and of two hour fire resistance rating inaccordance with Section 8.2.1.1.

2. The interior surfaces of all heavy timber walls and ceilings shall be covered by two layers of 5/8" Type X gypsum board, with alledges of the face layer offset 18" from those of the base layer. The base layer shall be attached with 1.75" #6 Type S drywall screwsat 12" o.c. in both directions and the face layer to be attached with 2.25" #6 Type S drywall screws at 12" o.c. in both directions offsetfrom the screws in the base layer by 6 inches in both directions. One layer of 5/8" Type X gypsum sheathing shall be attached to theoutside of the exterior heavy timber walls with minimum 1 ¾" galvanized roofing nails 12" on center each way and 6" on center at alljoints or ends. All panel edges shall be attached with drywall screws or roofing nails located at least 1.5 inches but no more than 2inches from the panel edge.

3. Fire-retardant treated wood , of light-frame construction, shall not be permitted as a bearing element in any walls.


1. The proposed language does not include all occupancies and lacks justification for why the language was focused only on hotels and apartment occupancies and cannot be applied to other occupancies. 2. The proposed language does not require other fire engineering analyses/risk assessments, which are a common and accepted part of the practice in the industry when designing tall timber buildings. New material and new construction techniques should be justified through a detailed engineering analyses. Appropriate results cannot be accomplished with only the requirements contained in the proposed language of Section 7.4.3.6.9. 3. The proposed language is too prescriptive.4. The 50 ft building separation requirement in 7.4.3.6.8(1) is difficult to meet and too limiting.5. The authority having jurisdiction should be presented with a risk analysis to determine if the construction is feasible in their jurisdiction.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 8006-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 7.4.3.6.8.4]


Submitter Full Name: James Quiter

Organization: Arup

Street Address:


55 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri May 13 16:27:52 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Refer to annex Language found in A.7.4.3.6.9 for a response to objections 1, 2, 3, and 5. It was the intent of the committee tobe prescriptive. A 50ft separation distance exists in other codes and this committee does not find it unreasonable.


56 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


8.1.2.3* Wall Marking and Identification.

For other than existing assemblies, where Where there is an accessible concealed floor, floor/ceiling, or attic space, fire walls, firebarriers, smoke barriers, and smoke partitions shall be permanently identified with signs or stenciling in the concealed space and shallcomply with all of the following:

(1) Be located in accessible concealed floor, floor/ceiling, or attic spaces

(2) Be located within 15 ft (4572 mm) of the end of each wall and at intervals not exceeding 30 ft (9144 mm) measured horizontallyalong the wall or partition

(3) Include lettering not less than 3 in. (76 mm) in height with a minimum 3⁄8 in. (9.5 mm) stroke in a contrasting color

(4) Identify the wall type and its fire resistive resistance rating as applicable





NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 8 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to revise 8.1.2.3 as follows:

Within section 8.1.2.3, delete "For other than existing assemblies…". Replace the word "resistive" with the word "resistance" within item (4).


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The committee accepts the direction of the Correlating Committee to revise 8.1.2.3 and delete "For other than existingassemblies…" as well as replace the word "resistive" with the word "resistance" within item (4). NFPA 5000 is applicable tonew construction only.


57 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to revise 8.1.2.3 as follows:

Within section 8.1.2.3, delete "For other than existing assemblies…". Replace the word "resistive" with the word "resistance"within item (4).


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:53 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:53 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 74-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 8.4.3.2 ]

8.4.3.3

Where impact protection is added to a fire-protected covering, the impact protection shall not reduce the fire resistance rating.


This comment changes the term degrade to reduce in order to eliminate a term that the TC felt was vague. Note that the term degrade is used eight times in NFPA 5000.

Related Item

Public Input No. 123-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 8.4.3.2]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment changes the term degrade to reduce in order to eliminate a term that the TC felt was vague. Note that theterm degrade is used eight times in NFPA 5000.


58 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


8.7 Opening Protectives.

8.7.1 General.

Every opening in a fire barrier shall be protected to limit the spread of fire and restrict the movement of smoke from one side of thefire barrier to the other.

8.7.2 Minimum Fire Protection Rating.

8.7.2.1*

Fire protection ratings for products required to comply with Section 8.7 shall be as determined and reported by a nationallyrecognized testing agency in accordance with NFPA 252; UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies; UL 10C, Standard forPositive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies; NFPA 257; or UL 9, Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies.


59 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

8.7.2.2


60 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

The fire protection rating for opening protectives in fire barriers, fire-rated smoke barriers, and fire-rated smoke partitions shall be inaccordance with Table 8.7.2.2.

Opening protectives shall have a minimum fire protection rating as specified in Table 8.7.2.2.

Table 8.7.2.2 Minimum Fire Ratings for Opening Protectives in Fire Resistance–Rated Assemblies and Fire-Rated Glazing Markings

Component

Wallsand

Partitions(hr)

Fire DoorAssemblies

(hr)

DoorVisionPanel

MaximumSize

(in.2)

Fire-RatedGlazingMarking

DoorVisionPanel

Minimum SideLight/Transom

Assembly Rating (hr)

Fire-Rated GlazingMarking Side

Light/Transom Panel

Minimum Fire-Rat

Windows Ratinga,

(hr)

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

Fireresistance

Fireprotection

Fireresistan

Elevatorhoistways 2 1 1⁄2 155 in.2 c

D-H-90 orD-H-W-90 NP 2 NP D-H-W-120 NP 2

1 1 155 in.2 fD-H-60 orD-H-W-60 NP 1 NP D-H-W-60 NP 1

Elevatorlobby (per7.2.13.4) 1 1 100 in.2 c

≤100 in.2,D-H-T-60 orD-H-W-60 NP 1 NP D-H-W-60 NP 1

>100 in.2,D-H-W-60

Verticalshafts(includingstairways,exits, andrefusechutes) 2 1 1⁄2

Maximumsize tested


1 1Maximumsize tested


Replacementpanels inexistingverticalshafts 1⁄2 1⁄3

Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3 D-H-20 D-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3

Fire barriers 3 3 100 in.2 c

≤100 in.2,D-H-180 orD-H-W-180 NP 3 NP D-H-W-180 NP 3

>100 in.2,D-H-W-180

2 1 1⁄2Maximumsize tested


1 3⁄4

Maximumsize

testeddD-H-45 orD-H-W-45 3⁄4 d 3⁄4 d D-H-45 D-H-W-45 3⁄4 3⁄4

1⁄2 1⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3 D-H-20 D-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3

Horizontalexits 2 1 1⁄2

Maximumsize tested


Horizontalexits servedby bridgesbetweenbuildings

2 3⁄4

Maximumsize

testedd

D-H-45 orD-H-W-45

3⁄4 d 3⁄4 d D-H-45 D-H-W-45 3⁄4 3⁄4

Exit access

corridorse 1 1⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

3⁄4 3⁄4 D- H-45 D-H-W-20 3⁄4 3⁄4

1⁄2 1⁄3Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

1⁄3 1⁄3 D-H-20 D-H-W-20 1⁄3 1⁄3

Smoke

barriers e1 1⁄3

Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

3⁄4 3⁄4 D-H-45 D-H-W-20 3⁄4 3⁄4

Smoke

partitions e,f1⁄2 1⁄2

Maximumsize tested

D-20 orD-W-20

1⁄2 1⁄2 D-H-20 D-H-W-20 1⁄2 1⁄2

For SI Units, 1 in.2 = 0.00064516 m2.

NP: Not permitted.


61 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

a Fire resistance–rated glazing tested to NFPA 251 shall be permitted in the maximum size tested (see 8.3.3.7).

b Fire-rated glazing in exterior windows shall be marked in accordance with Table 8.3.3.12.

c See ASME A17.1, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, for additional information.

d Maximum area of individual exposed lights shall be 1296 in.2 (0.84 m2), with no dimension exceeding 54 in. (1.37 m) unlessotherwise tested. [80:Table 4.4.5 Note b and 80:4.4.5.1].

e Fire doors are not required to have a hose stream test per NFPA 252; UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies; or UL10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies.

f For residential board and care, see 32.2.3.1 and 33.2.3.1.

8.7.2.3

Openings required to have a fire protection rating by Table 8.7.2.2 shall be protected by approved, listed, and labeled fire doorassemblies and fire window assemblies and their accompanying hardware, including all frames, closing devices, anchorage, and sillsin accordance with the requirements of NFPA 80, except as otherwise specified in this Code.

8.7.3 Fire Doors.

8.7.3.1

Fire door assemblies shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 80.

8.7.3.2

All fire door assemblies shall bear an approved label.

8.7.3.3

The maximum size of the fire doors shall not exceed that specified in NFPA 80, except as modified by Chapter 11.

8.7.3.4*

Unless otherwise specified, fire doors shall be self-closing or automatic-closing.

8.7.4* Floor Fire Door Assemblies.

8.7.4.1

Floor fire door assemblies used to protect openings in fire resistance–rated floors shall be tested in the horizontal position inaccordance with NFPA 288 and shall achieve a fire resistance rating not less than the assembly being penetrated.

8.7.4.2

Floor fire door assemblies shall be listed and labeled.

8.7.5 Fire Windows.

8.7.5.1

Fire window assemblies shall be installed in accordance with NFPA 80.

8.7.5.2

All fire window assemblies shall bear an approved label.

8.7.5.3*

Fire window assemblies shall be permitted in fire barriers having a required fire resistance rating of 1 hour or less and shall be of anapproved type with the appropriate fire protection rating for the location in which they are installed.

8.7.6 Windows in Exterior Walls.

8.7.6.1

Three-quarter-hour fire protection–rated windows in exterior walls shall be permitted to have an area not over 84 ft2 (7.8 m2), withneither the width nor the height exceeding 12 ft (3660 mm).

8.7.6.2

Fire windows shall be either fixed or automatic-closing.

8.7.7 Glazing.

8.7.7.1

Glazing materials that have been listed and labeled to indicate the type of opening to be protected for fire protection purposes shallbe permitted to be used in approved opening protectives in accordance with their listing and with the maximum sizes tested.


62 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

8.7.7.2

Fire-rated glazing assemblies shall be permitted as follows:

(1) Those marked as complying with hose stream requirements (H) shall be permitted in applications that do not requirecompliance with hose stream requirements.

(2) Those marked as complying with temperature rise requirements (T) shall be permitted in applications that do not requirecompliance with temperature rise requirements.

(3) Those marked with ratings that exceed the ratings required by this Code shall be permitted.

Table 8.7.7.2 Marking Fire-Rated Glazing Assemblies

Fire Test Standard Marking Definition of Marking

ASTM E119 or UL 263 W Meets wall assembly criteria

NFPA 257 or UL 9 OH Meets fire window assembly criteria, including the hose stream test

NFPA 252, UL 10B, or UL 10C D Meets fire door assembly criteria

H Meets fire door assembly hose stream test

T Meets to 450°F (232°C) temperature rise criteria for 30 minutes

XXX The time, in minutes, of the fire resistance or fire protection rating of the glazing assembly

8.7.7.3

Fire protection–rated glazing shall be marked in accordance with Table 8.7.2.2 and Table 8.7.7.3, and such marking shall bepermanently affixed.

8.7.7.4

Fire protection–rated glazing shall be permitted in fire barriers having a required fire resistance rating of 1 hour or less and shall be ofan approved type with the appropriate fire protection rating for the location in which the barriers are installed.

8.7.7.5*

Glazing in fire window assemblies shall be of a design that has been tested to meet the conditions of acceptance of NFPA 257 or UL9, Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies.

8.7.7.6

Fire protection–rated glazing in fire door assemblies shall be of a design that has been tested to meet the conditions of acceptanceof NFPA 252; UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies; or UL 10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of DoorAssemblies.

8.7.7.7

Fire resistance–rated glazing complying with 8.2.2.4.2 shall be permitted in fire doors and fire window assemblies in accordance withtheir listings.

8.7.7.8

Nonsymmetrical fire protection–rated glazing systems shall be tested with each face exposed to the furnace, and the assigned fireprotection rating shall be the shortest duration obtained from the two tests conducted in compliance with NFPA 257 or UL 9,Standard for Fire Tests of Window Assemblies.

8.7.7.9

The total combined area of glazing in fire-rated window assemblies and fire-rated door assemblies used in fire barriers shall notexceed 25 percent of the area of the fire barrier that is common with any room.

8.7.8 Sidelights and Transoms.

Glazing used in sidelights and transoms adjacent to 20-minute doors in 1-hour corridor fire barriers shall be tested in accordancewith 8.7.2, including hose stream, and shall attain a minimum 45-minute fire protection rating.





NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 9 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to do the following:

1. Change the text within 8.7.2.2 from “the fire protection rating for opening protectives…” to “the fire rating for opening protectives…” for correlation with the title of Table 8.7.2.2 (First Draft report numbering) as the table addresses both fire protection ratings and fire resistance ratings.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Klein relative to the inconsistency being created in Table 8.7.2.2 by requiring a smoke partition with 1-hr fire resistance rating to have 1-hr fire protection-rated opening protectives but continuing to allow a smoke barrier with1-hr fire resistance rating to have 1/3-hr fire protection-rated opening protectives.


63 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

3. Consider the Negative ballot of Koffel relative to applicability of annex text as not all opening protectives in a fire barrier are tested to limit smoke spread. Split annex text as appropriate so that it is tied to the applicable code requirement.

4. Revise 8.7.3.3, relative to fire doors not exceeding size requirements of NFPA 80, to delete the words “except as modified byChapter 11” unless it can be documented that Chapter 11 permits larger fire doors.

5. Within Table 8.7.2.2 the section on “fire barriers” within the table should be relocated to the beginning of the table or the end of the table to clarify that it addresses fire barriers as otherwise not addressed within the table. The term “other fire barriers” is suggested.

These actions will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 9-NFPA 5000-2016 [Sections 8.7, 8.8, 8.9]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: See SR-3505 and SR-3506

Statement: Section 8.7.2.2: Per the request of the Correlating Committee, the text of Section 8.7.2.2 was updated for correlation with thetitle of Table 8.7.2.2. The deletion of the second sentence is editorial as it is repetitive.

Table 8.7.2.2: The row for fire barriers within the table is being relocated to the end of the table, before the entry for smokebarriers. This change will help clarify that it addresses fire barriers not otherwise addressed within the table. This changesupports the request of the Correlating Committee as well as the Committee Input developed during the First Draft stage. Thetable also contains a new row for one hour smoke partitions and 1/2 hour smoke barriers. The committee reviewed the ballotcomments addressing any inconsistencies in the table with smoke partitions and smoke barriers and the addition of theseentries for updates the table to address all rated components throughout the Code. Additional minor changes to the table updateerrors and inconsistencies from the First Draft version of the Table.


64 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 9-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 8.7, 8.8, 8.9 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to do the following:

1. Change the text within 8.7.2.2 from “the fire protection rating for opening protectives…” to “the fire rating for openingprotectives…” for correlation with the title of Table 8.7.2.2 (First Draft report numbering) as the table addresses both fire protectionratings and fire resistance ratings.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Klein relative to the inconsistency being created in Table 8.7.2.2 by requiring a smoke partitionwith 1-hr fire resistance rating to have 1-hr fire protection-rated opening protectives but continuing to allow a smoke barrier with1-hr fire resistance rating to have 1/3-hr fire protection-rated opening protectives.

3. Consider the Negative ballot of Koffel relative to applicability of annex text as not all opening protectives in a fire barrier aretested to limit smoke spread. Split annex text as appropriate so that it is tied to the applicable code requirement.

4. Revise 8.7.3.3, relative to fire doors not exceeding size requirements of NFPA 80, to delete the words “except as modified byChapter 11” unless it can be documented that Chapter 11 permits larger fire doors.

5. Within Table 8.7.2.2 the section on “fire barriers” within the table should be relocated to the beginning of the table or the end ofthe table to clarify that it addresses fire barriers as otherwise not addressed within the table. The term “other fire barriers” issuggested.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:54 PM

of 281

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.

Negative with Comment

Laramee, Scott T.

This will create inconsistency in Table 8.7.2.2 by requiring a smoke partition with 1-hr fire resistance rating to have 1-hr fire protection-ratedopening protectives while allowing some smoke barriers with 1-hr fire resistance rating to have 20 minute fire protection-rated opening protectives.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:54 PM

of 281


8.8.5 Vibration Isolation.

Where designs take transmission of vibrations into consideration, any vibration isolation shall meet one of the following conditions:

It shall be made on either side of the wall or floor.

It shall be designed for the specific purpose

Vibration isolation equipment or systems. Where the vibration isloation of equipment or systems are employed, the vibrationrestraint(s) shall be located outside of the partition, wall or floor assembly for which the equipment or systems are passing through .


At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125 (NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reason statement the following:“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anything nor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent only addressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However, discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current language used to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section, that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. The intent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipment and systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexible conduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No. 92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a global referral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need for sub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’s literature and warranty.

Related Item

Public Input No. 92-NFPA 5000-2015 [Sections 8.7, 8.8, 8.9]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 30 10:30:11 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125(NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reasonstatement the following:

“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anythingnor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent onlyaddressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However,


65 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current languageused to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section,that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. Theintent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipmentand systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexibleconduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No.92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a globalreferral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need forsub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’sliterature and warranty.


66 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




5000_CCN_10.pdf 5000 CC Note #10


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 10 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Koffel and the Abstention ballot of McHugh to revise the text to capture what the smoke detector installation is to accomplish, similar to that which is currently done for door operation in 11.2.1.8.2(4).


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The revised language addresses the request of the Correlating Committee to revise text to capture what the smoke detectorinstallation is to accomplish. The additional text was added for consistency with 11.2.1.9.2(4).


67 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot ofKoffel and the Abstention ballot of McHugh to revise the text to capture what the smoke detector installation is to accomplish,similar to that which is currently done for door operation in 11.2.1.8.2(4).


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:56 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:56 PM

of 281


8.10.4.3

Where designs take transmissions of vibration into consideration, any vibration isolation shall meet one of the following conditions:

It shall be made on either side of the smoke partitions.

It shall be designed for the specific purpose

Vibration isolation equipment or systems. Where the vibration isolation of equipment or systems are employed, the vibrationrestraint(s) shall be located outside of the partition, wall or floor assembly for which the equipment or systems are passing through .


At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125 (NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reason statement the following:“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anything nor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent only addressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However, discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current language used to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section, that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. The intent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipment and systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexible conduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No. 92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a global referral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need for sub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’s literature and warranty.

Related Item

Public Input No. 92-NFPA 5000-2015 [Sections 8.7, 8.8, 8.9]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Mar 30 10:34:27 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: At the 30 July 2015 NFPA FIR meeting the committee had deliberated the various concerns with the Public Input No. 125(NFPA 5000), and how to address the concerns of the proponent and our own concerns.

The proponent to PI-125 requested Section 8.8.5 of NFPA 5000 be deleted without substation, and stated in his reasonstatement the following:

“This provision does not address anything. No purpose seems to be served by this section. It does not appear to limit anythingnor impart meaningful guidance to the provision of vibration isolation.”

The NFPA FIR did not find that there was a compelling need to delete without substitution this provision, and the proponent onlyaddressed one of many sections with the identical content, which led to the NFPA FIR rejecting this proposal. However,


68 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

discussions during the FIR meeting did reveal that the proponent may have had a point with respect to the current languageused to describe the requirement versus the intent for this provision.

It was felt that the original submitter did have a point. The existing language does not clearly address the focus of this section,that of prohibiting vibration isolation equipment and systems from being installed within partitions, wall or floor assemblies. Theintent is to require that such equipment or systems be installed on either side of the subject partition or assembly. Equipmentand systems can include, but not be limited to, flexible duct connectors, flexible pipe pump connectors, pipe isolators, or flexibleconduit.

This proposal also wishes to modify that work with this proposal under Public Input No. 265 (NFPA 101), and Public Input No.92 (NFPA 5000). The basis for this is that the 2015 proposed language uses the phrase “vibration isolation” which is a globalreferral, versus using the term “restraints” which is what the system represents. Second, it was felt there was no need forsub-item #2 which states “…it shall be designed for the specific purpose…” since that is covered under the manufacture’sliterature and warranty.


69 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


8.11.5 Penetrations.

8.11.5.1

The provisions of 8.11.5 shall govern the materials and methods of construction used to protect through-penetrations and membranepenetrations of smoke barriers.

8.11.5.2

Penetrations for cables, cable trays, conduits, pipes, tubes, vents, wires, and similar items to accommodate electrical, mechanical,plumbing, and communications systems that pass through a wall, floor, or floor/ceiling assembly constructed as a smoke barrier, orthrough the ceiling membrane of the roof/ceiling of a smoke barrier, shall be protected by a listed system tested in accordance withthe requirements of UL 1479 for air leakage. The air leakage rate of the penetration assemblies, measured at 0.30 in. (7.47 Pa) ofwater in both the ambient temperature and elevated temperature tests, shall not exceed:

(1) 5 ft3/m per ft2 (0.025 m3/s per m2) of penetration opening for each through-penetration firestop system

(2) A total cumulative leakage of 50 ft3/m (0.024 m3/s) for any 100 ft2 (9.3 m2) of wall area or floor area

8.11.5.3

Where a smoke barrier is also constructed as a fire barrier, the penetrations shall be protected in accordance with the requirementsof Section 8.8 to limit the spread of fire for a time period equal to the fire resistance rating of the assembly, as required by 8.11.5, torestrict the transfer of smoke, unless the requirements of 8.11.5.4 are met.

8.11.5.4

Where sprinklers penetrate a single membrane of a fire resistance–rated assembly in buildings equipped throughout with anapproved automatic fire sprinkler system, noncombustible escutcheon plates shall be permitted, provided that the space around eachsprinkler penetration does not exceed 1⁄2 in. (13 mm), measured between the edge of the membrane and the sprinkler.

8.11.5.5

Where the penetration item uses a sleeve to penetrate the smoke barrier, the sleeve shall be securely set in the smoke barrier, andthe space between the item and the sleeve shall be filled with a listed system or a material capable of restricting the transfer ofsmoke in accordance with 8.11.5.2.

8.11.5.6

Where designs take transmission of vibrations into consideration, any vibration isolation shall meet one of the following conditions:

(1) It shall be made on either side of the fire barrier.

(2) It shall be designed for the specific purpose.



5000_CCN_11.pdf 5000 CC Note #11



1. Revise the requirement of 8.11.5.2 so that it has applicability if the smoke barrier is also constructed as a fire barrier – for sample language, see 8.11.5.3.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Shino relative to providing substantiation for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column, given that the provisions 11.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05 inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10 inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.

3. Revise the text of 8.11.5.5 to change the word “penetration” to “penetrating”. Also confirm if “filled with a listed system or a material capable of restricting the transfer of smoke…” should use the word “or” or “of”. Text should be consistent with 101 section.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 11-NFPA 5000-2016 [Sections 8.11.5.2, 8.11.5.3, 8.11.5.4, 8.11.5.5]



70 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: See SR-3512 and SR-3513. In response to (1), no additional revisions are necessary as the current text of 8.11.5 adequatelyaddresses the application to smoke barriers constructed as fire barriers.

Statement: The addition of the word 'through' clarifies the application of the section and addresses the request of the CorrelatingCommittee to consider the negative ballot comment. The deleted text regarding the L rating is redundant as it is included in theANSI/UL 1479 test. The repeated language is not needed here. The addition of the term 'maximum' to (1) and (2) clarify theallowable leakage per system and area.


71 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 11-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 8.11.5.2, 8.11.5.3, 8.11.5.4, 8.11.5.5 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:


1. Revise the requirement of 8.11.5.2 so that it has applicability if the smoke barrier is also constructed as a fire barrier – forsample language, see 8.11.5.3.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Shino relative to providing substantiation for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column,given that the provisions 11.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05 inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.

3. Revise the text of 8.11.5.5 to change the word “penetration” to “penetrating”. Also confirm if “filled with a listed system or amaterial capable of restricting the transfer of smoke…” should use the word “or” or “of”. Text should be consistent with 101section.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:57 PM

of 281


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.

Substantiation is needed for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column since provisions of 11.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10 inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:57 PM

of 281


8.11.7 Joints.

8.11.7.1

The provisions of 8.11.7 shall govern the materials and methods of construction used to protect joints in between and at theperimeter of smoke barriers where smoke barriers meet other smoke barriers, the floor or roof deck above, or the outside walls.

8.11.7.2

Joints made within, between, or at the perimeter of smoke barriers shall be protected with a listed joint system that is tested inaccordance with the requirements of UL 2079, Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems, for air leakage. The L rating of the

joint system shall not exceed 5 ft3/m per ft (0.00775 m3/s per m) of joint at 0.30 in. (7.47 Pa) of water for both the ambienttemperature and elevated temperature tests.

8.11.7.3

Joints made within or between smoke barriers shall be protected with a listed joint system or a material that is capable of restrictingthe transfer of smoke in accordance with 8.11.7.2.

8.11.7.4

Smoke barriers that are constructed as fire barriers shall be protected with a listed joint system that is designed and tested to resistthe spread of fire for a time period equal to the required fire resistance rating of the assembly in accordance with Section 8.9 and torestrict the transfer of smoke.

8.11.7.5

Testing of the joint system in a smoke barrier that also serves as fire barrier shall be representative of the actual installation suitablefor the required engineering demand without compromising the fire resistance rating of the assembly or the structural integrity of theassembly.



5000_CCN_12.pdf 5000 CC Note #12



1. Revise the requirement of 8.11.7.2 so that it has applicability if the smoke barrier is also constructed as a fire barrier – for sample language, see 8.11.7.4.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Shino relative to providing substantiation for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column, given that the provisions 7.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05 inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10 inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.

3. Revise the provisions of 8.11.7.3 to determine if the text is still necessary with the new revisions to 8.11.7.2. Equivalent text to8.11.7.3 was deleted in NFPA 101.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


72 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

CommitteeAction:


Resolution: 1. No revision is needed as the application of the section is adequately addressed in current text of Section 8.11. 2. SeeSR-3514-NFPA 5000-2016 3. See SR-3515-NFPA 5000-2016

Statement: The deleted text regarding the L rating is redundant as it is included in the ANSI/UL 2079 test. The repeated language is notneeded here. The change is consistent with changes made to Section 8.11.5.


73 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 12-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 8.11.7 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:


1. Revise the requirement of 8.11.7.2 so that it has applicability if the smoke barrier is also constructed as a fire barrier – forsample language, see 8.11.7.4.

2. Consider the Negative ballot of Shino relative to providing substantiation for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column,given that the provisions 7.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05 inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.

3. Revise the provisions of 8.11.7.3 to determine if the text is still necessary with the new revisions to 8.11.7.2. Equivalent text to8.11.7.3 was deleted in NFPA 101.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 1:58 PM

of 281

Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.

Substantiation is needed for the requirement for 0.30 inches water column since provisions of 11.2.3 for smokeproof enclosures require 0.05inches water column in sprinklered buildings and 0.10 inches water column in nonsprinklered buildings.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 1:58 PM

of 281


8.12.5.1

Where permitted by Chapters 15 through 31 and 33 through 34, unenclosed vertical openings not concealed within the buildingconstruction shall be permitted as follows:

(1) Such openings shall connect not more than two adjacent stories (one floor pierced only).

(2) Such openings shall be separated from unprotected vertical openings serving other floors by a barrier complying with 8.6.5.

(3)

(4)

(5) Such openings shall be separated from the corridor referenced in 8.12.5.1 (3) by a smoke partition, unless Chapters 15 through31 and 33 through 34 require the corridor to have a fire resistance rating.

(6)



5000_CCN_13.pdf 5000 CC Note #13


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 15 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features to revise the referenced section in A.8.12.5.1(3) as follows:

…open to the corridor on the adjacent floor by a barrier that limits the transfer of smoke, in accordance with 19.3.6.2.3, not a one hour rated wall with opening protectives.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: In response to Public Comment No. 13 (CC Note No. 15) the referenced section is being updated to Section 19.3.6.2.3

* Such openings shall be separated from corridors.

* Such openings shall be separated from other fire or smoke compartments on the same floor.

* Such openings shall not serve as a required means of egress.


74 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features to revise the referenced section in A.8.12.5.1(3) asfollows:

…open to the corridor on the adjacent floor by a barrier that limits the transfer of smoke, in accordance with 19.3.6.2.3, not aone hour rated wall with opening protectives.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:00 PM

of 281


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:00 PM

of 281


8.14.1.3

Draftstopping materials shall be not less than 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) type X gypsum board or other approved materials that are adequatelysupported.



5000_CCN_14.pdf 5000 CC Note #14


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 14 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to consider the Negative ballots of Devlin, Frances, Gerdes, Klein, Shino and Stashak relative to providing technical substantiation for why a draft stop additionally needs fire resisting capability like that provided by Type X gypsum wall board.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: Per the request of the Correlating Committee, the negative ballot comments were considered. This change reverts back to 2015edition text in response to the ballot comments. The purpose of draftstopping is not to stop the spread of fire, but to inhibitairflow and air movement. The change made at the First Draft stage eliminated the allowance for material such as 1/2" plywoodand 15/32" structural panel to be used to satisfy the draftstopping provisions without appropriate technical justification as to whythe material is not satisfactory. The 2015 text is adequate.


75 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features (FIR) to consider the Negative ballots of Devlin, Frances,Gerdes, Klein, Shino and Stashak relative to providing technical substantiation for why a draft stop additionally needs fire resistingcapability like that provided by Type X gypsum wall board.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:02 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.

Substatiation is needed as to why a draft stop additionally needs fire resisting capability like that provided by Type X gypsum wall board.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:02 PM

of 281


8.15.4 * Alcohol-Based Hand-Rub Dispensers.

Where permitted by Chapters 15 through 31 and 33 through 34, alcohol-based hand-rub dispensers shall be permitted provided theymeet all of the following criteria:

(1) The maximum individual dispenser fluid capacity shall be as follows:

(2) 0.32 gal (1.2 L) for dispensers in corridors and areas open to corridors

(3) 0.53 gal (2.0 L) for dispensers in rooms or suites of rooms separated from corridors

(4) Where aerosol containers are used, the maximum capacity of the aerosol dispenser shall be 18 oz. (0.51 kg) and shall belimited to Level 1 aerosols as defined in NFPA 30B

(5) Dispensers shall be separated from each other by horizontal spacing of not less than 48 in. (1220 mm).

(6) Not more than an aggregate 10 gal (37.8 L) of alcohol-based hand-rub solution or 1135 oz (32.2 kg) of Level 1 aerosols, or acombination of liquids and Level 1 aerosols not to exceed, in total, the equivalent of 10 gal (37.8 L) or 1135 oz (32.2 kg,) shallbe in use outside of a storage cabinet in a single smoke compartment, or fire compartment or story, whichever is less in area.One dispenser complying with 8.15.4(1) per room and located in that room shall not be included in the aggregated quantity.

(7) Storage of quantities greater than 5 gal (18.9 L) in a single smoke compartment or fire compartment or story, whichever is lessin area, shall meet the requirements of NFPA 30.

(8) Dispensers shall not be installed in the following locations:

(9) Above an ignition source for a horizontal distance of 1 in. (25 mm) to each side of the ignition source

(10) To the side of an ignition source within a 1 in. (25 mm) horizontal distance from the ignition source

(11) Beneath an ignition source within a 1 in. (25 mm) vertical distance from the ignition source

(12) Dispensers installed directly over carpeted floors shall be permitted only in sprinklered areas of the building.

(13) The alcohol-based hand-rub solution shall not exceed 95 percent alcohol content by volume.

(14) Operation of the dispenser shall comply with the following criteria:

(15) The dispenser shall not release its contents except when the dispenser is activated, either manually or automatically bytouch-free activation.

(16) Any activation of the dispenser shall only occur when an object is placed within 4 in. (100 mm) of the sensing device.

(17) An object placed within the activation zone and left in place shall not cause more than one activation.

(18) The dispenser shall not dispense more solution than the amount required for hand hygiene consistent with labelinstructions.

(19) The dispenser shall be designed, constructed, and operated in a manner that ensures accidental or malicious activationof the dispensing device is minimized.

(20) The dispenser shall be tested in accordance with the manufacturer’s care and use instructions each time a new refill isinstalled.


This should not be a building code issue. This should be a fire code issue. As such, this should be deleted from the NFPA 5000 and NFPA 101 for all occupancies. Note that Section 8.7.3 of NFPA 101 (FR-2507) addresses hand sanitizers, and a comment has been submitted to it for deletion based on the same reasons.

Related Item






76 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: NFPA 5000 addresses other components similar to ABHR such as interior finish. It is appropriate for 5000 to include guidanceon this topic. ABHR materials and dispensers are found in almost every occupancy. The provisions provide the guidanceneeded for owners and AHJs and also provides necessary guidance for occupancy chapters. A majority of the occupancychapters currently reference this section. If, in the future, occupancy chapters chose to opt out of referencing this section, theCorrelating Committee can provide guidance on its deletion if necessary.


77 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.2* Interior Finish.

10.2.1 General.

10.2.1.1

Classification of interior finish materials shall be in accordance with tests made under conditions simulating actual installations,provided that the authority having jurisdiction is permitted to establish the classification of any material for which a classification by astandard test is not available.

10.2.1.2

Fixed or movable walls and partitions, paneling, wall pads, and crash pads applied structurally or for decoration, acousticalcorrection, surface insulation, or other purposes shall be considered interior finish and shall not be considered decorations orfurnishings.

10.2.1.3

Lockers shall be considered interior finish.

10.2.1.4

Washroom water closet partitions shall be considered interior finish.

10.2.1.5

Fire-retardant coatings shall be in accordance with 10.2.6.

10.2.2* Use of Interior Finishes.

10.2.2.1

Requirements for interior wall and ceiling finish shall apply as follows:

(1) Where specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupancies as noted in Chapter 11, Chapters 15 through 31, and Chapters33 through 34

(2) As specified in 10.2.3 through 10.2.5

10.2.2.2*

Interior floor finish shall comply with 10.2.6 under any of the following conditions:

(1) Where floor finish requirements are specified elsewhere in this Code

(2) Where the fire performance of the floor finish cannot be demonstrated to be equivalent to floor finishes with a critical radiant flux

of at least 0.1 W/cm2

10.2.3* Interior Wall or Ceiling Finish Testing and Classification.

When interior wall or ceiling finish is required elsewhere in this Code to be classified for fire performance and smoke development itshall be classified in accordance with 10.2.3.1 or 10.2.3.3, except as indicated in 10.2.4.

10.2.3.1 Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish Materials Tested in Accordance with NFPA 286.

10.2.3.1.1

Interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be classified in accordance with NFPA 286 and comply with 10.2.3.2.

10.2.3.1.2

Materials tested in accordance with 10.2.3.1.1 and complying with 10.2.3.2 shall be considered also to comply with the requirementsof a Class A, Class B, or Class C in accordance with 10.2.3.3.

10.2.3.2 Acceptance Criteria for NFPA 286.

The interior finish shall comply with the following:

(1) During the 40 kW exposure, flames shall not spread to the ceiling.

(2) The flame shall not spread to the outer extremity of the sample on any wall or ceiling.

(3) Flashover, as defined in NFPA 286, shall not occur.

(4) The peak heat release rate throughout the test shall not exceed 800 kW.

(5) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 10,764 ft2 (1000 m2).

10.2.3.3* Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish Materials Tested in Accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723.


78 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be classified in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface BurningCharacteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, exceptas indicated in 10.2.3.4 and 10.2.3.5 and shall be grouped in the following classes in accordance with their flame spread andsmoke-developed indexes:

(1) Class A: Flame spread index 0–25; smoke developed index 0–450.

(2) Class B: Flame spread index 26–75; smoke developed index 0–450.

(3) Class C: Flame spread index 76–200; smoke developed index 0–450.

10.2.3.3.1

The classification of interior finish specified in 10.2.3.3 shall be that of the basic material used by itself or in combination with othermaterials.

10.2.3.3.2

Wherever the use of Class C interior wall and ceiling finish is required, Class A or Class B shall be permitted, and where Class Binterior wall and ceiling finish is required, Class A shall be permitted.

10.2.3.4

Materials complying with the requirements of 10.2.3.1 shall not be required to be tested in accordance with 10.2.3.3.

10.2.3.5

Materials described in 10.2.4 shall be tested as described in the corresponding sections.

10.2.3.6*

Fire-retardant coatings shall not be used to obtain compliance with the interior finish requirements of this Code.

10.2.3.7*

Surfaces of walls, partitions, columns, and ceilings shall be permitted to be finished with factory-applied fire-retardant-coatedproducts that have been listed and labeled to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of ASTM E2768, Standard Test Methodfor Extended Duration Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, on the coated surface.

10.2.4* Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish Materials with Special Requirements.

The materials indicated in 10.2.4.1 through 10.2.4.15 shall be tested as indicated in the corresponding sections.

10.2.4.1 Thickness Exemption.

10.2.4.1.1

The provisions of 10.2.3 shall not apply to materials having a total thickness of less than 1⁄28 in. (0.9 mm) that are applied directly tothe surface of walls and ceilings where both of the following conditions are met:

(1) The wall or ceiling surface is a noncombustible or limited combustible material.

(2) The materials applied meet the requirements of Class A interior wall or ceiling finish when tested in accordance with 10.2.3,using fiber cement board as the substrate material.

10.2.4.1.2

If a material having a total thickness of less than 1⁄28 in. (0.9 mm) is applied to a surface that is not noncombustible or not limited-combustible, the provisions of 10.2.3 shall apply.

10.2.4.2* Exposed Portions of Structural Members.

In other than interior exit stairways, exit ramps, and exit passageways, exposed portions of structural members complying with therequirements for Type IV (2HH) construction in accordance with 7.2.5 of this code shall be exempt from testing and classification inaccordance with 10.2.3.

10.2.4.3 Cellular or Foamed Plastic.

10.2.4.3.1

Cellular or foamed plastic materials shall not be used as interior wall and ceiling finish unless specifically permitted by 10.2.4.3.3 or10.2.4.3.4.

10.2.4.3.2

The requirements of 10.2.4.3 shall apply both to exposed foamed plastics and to foamed plastics used in conjunction with a textile orvinyl facing or cover.

10.2.4.3.3

Cellular or foamed plastic materials meeting the definition of foamed plastic insulation shall be permitted where subjected tolarge-scale fire tests that substantiate their combustibility and smoke release characteristics of the material for the use intendedunder actual fire conditions.


79 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.2.4.3.3.1

One of the following fire tests shall be used for assessing the combustibility of cellular or foamed plastic materials as interior finish:

(1) NFPA 286 with the acceptance criteria of 10.2.3.4

(2) UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material, [(including smoke measurements, with total smoke release not to

exceed 10,764 ft2 (1000 m2)]

(3) UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction

(4) FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials, or Coatingsand Exterior Wall Systems

10.2.4.3.3.2

The tests shall be performed on a finished foamed plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration, including any coveror facing, and at the maximum thickness intended for use.

10.2.4.3.3.3*

Cellular or foamed plastic materials tested in accordance with UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction, or FMApproval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials, or Coatings andExterior Wall Systems, shall also be tested for smoke release using NFPA 286, with the acceptance criterion of 10.2.3.2.

10.2.4.3.4

Cellular or foamed plastic shall be permitted for trim not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall or ceiling area to which it is

applied, provided that it is not less than 20 lb/ft3 (320 kg/m3) in density, is limited to 1⁄2 in. (13 mm) in thickness and 4 in. (100 mm) inwidth, and complies with the requirements for Class A or Class B interior wall and ceiling finish as described in 10.2.3.3; however,the smoke developed index shall not be limited.

10.2.4.4* Textile Wall Coverings.

Where used as interior wall finish materials, textile materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use, using the productmounting system, including adhesive, and shall comply with the requirements of one of the following: 10.2.3.1, 10.2.4.4.1, or10.2.4.4.3.

10.2.4.4.1*

Products tested in accordance with NFPA 265 shall comply with the criteria of 10.2.4.4.2.

10.2.4.4.2*

The interior finish shall comply with all of the following when tested using method B of the test protocol of NFPA 265:


(2) The flame shall not spread to the outer extremities of the samples on the 8 ft × 12 ft (2440 mm × 3660 mm) walls.

(3) Flashover, as described in NFPA 265, shall not occur.

(4) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 10,764 ft2 (1000 m2).

10.2.4.4.3

Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for SurfaceBurning Characteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,using the specimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting ofTextile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) and Wood Wall or Ceiling Coverings, Facings and Veneers to Assess Surface BurningCharacteristics, shall be permitted as follows:

(1) On the walls of rooms or areas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system

(2) On partitions that do not exceed three-quarters of the floor-to-ceiling height or do not exceed 8 ft. (2440 mm) in height,whichever is less

(3) On the lower 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor on ceiling-height walls and ceiling-height partitions

10.2.4.5* Expanded Vinyl Wall Coverings.

Where used as interior wall finish materials, expanded vinyl wall coverings shall be tested in the manner intended for use, using theproduct mounting system, including adhesive, and shall comply with the requirements of one of the following: 10.2.3.1, 10.2.4.4.1, or10.2.4.4.3.

10.2.4.6 Textile Ceiling Coverings.

Where used as interior ceiling finish materials, textile materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use, using the productmounting system, including adhesive, and shall meet one of the following:

(1) Comply with the requirements of 10.2.3.1

(2) Meet the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface BurningCharacteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,using the specimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation andMounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) and Wood Wall or Ceiling Coverings, Facings and Veneers to AssessSurface Burning Characteristics, and used on the ceilings of rooms or areas protected by an approved automatic sprinklersystem


80 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.2.4.7 Expanded Vinyl Ceiling Coverings.

Where used as interior ceiling finish materials, expanded vinyl materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use, using theproduct mounting system, including adhesive, and shall either:

(1) Comply with the requirements of 10.2.3.1, or

(2) Meet the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface BurningCharacteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,using the specimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation andMounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) and Wood Wall or Ceiling Coverings, Facings and Veneers to AssessSurface Burning Characteristics, and used on the ceilings of rooms or areas protected by an approved automatic sprinklersystem

10.2.4.8 Lockers.

10.2.4.8.1 Combustible Lockers.

Where lockers constructed of combustible materials other than wood are used, the lockers shall be considered interior finish andshall comply with 10.2.3, except as permitted by 10.4.8.2.

10.2.4.8.2 Wood Lockers.

Lockers constructed entirely of wood and of noncombustible materials shall be permitted to be used in any location where interiorfinish materials are required to meet a Class C classification in accordance with 10.2.3.

10.2.4.9 Polypropylene (PP) and High-Density Polyethylene (HDPE).

10.2.4.9.1

Polypropylene and high-density polyethylene materials shall not be permitted as interior wall or ceiling finish unless the materialcomplies with the requirements of 10.2.3.1.

10.2.4.9.2

The tests shall be performed on a finished assembly and on the maximum thickness intended for use.

10.2.4.10 Site-Fabricated Stretch Systems.

10.2.4.10.1

For new installations, site-fabricated stretch systems containing all three components described in the definition in Chapter 3 shall betested in the manner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.2.3.1 or 10.2.3.3.

10.2.4.10.2

If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, specimen preparation and mountingshall be in accordance with ASTM E2573, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Site-fabricated StretchSystems to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics.

10.2.4.11 Reflective Insulation Materials.

10.2.4.11.1

Reflective insulation materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.2.3.1 or10.2.3.3.

10.2.4.11.2

If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, specimen preparation and mountingshall be in accordance with ASTM E2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation ,Radiant Barrier, and Vinyl Stretch Ceiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics.

10.2.4.12 Metal Ceiling and Wall Panels.

10.2.4.12.1

Listed factory finished metal ceiling and wall panels meeting the requirements of Class A in accordance with 10.2.3, shall bepermitted to be finished with one additional application of paint.

10.2.4.12.2

Such painted panels shall be permitted for use in areas where Class A interior finishes are required.

10.2.4.12.3

The total paint thickness shall not exceed 1⁄28 in. (0.9 mm).

10.2.4.13 Laminated Products Factory-Produced with a Wood Substrate.

10.2.4.13.1

Laminated products factory-produced with a wood substrate shall be tested in the manner intended for use and shall comply with therequirements of 10.2.3.1 or 10.2.3.3.

10.2.4.13.2

If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, specimen preparation and mountingshall be in accordance with ASTM E2579 using the product-mounting system (including adhesive) of actual use.


81 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.2.4.14 Facings or Wood Veneers Intended to Be Applied on Site Over a Wood Substrate.

10.2.4.14.1

Facings or veneers intended to be applied on site over a wood substrate shall be tested in the manner intended for use and shallcomply with the requirements of 10.2.3.1 or 10.2.3.3.

10.2.4.14.2

If the materials are tested in accordance with NFPA 286 they shall use the product-mounting system, including adhesive, describedin 5.8.9 of NFPA 286.

10.2.4.14.3

If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of BuildingMaterials, or UL 723, Standard for Test of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, specimen preparation and mountingshall be in accordance with ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Textile, Paper or Polymeric(including Vinyl) and Wood Wall or Ceiling Coverings, Facings and Veneers to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics.

10.2.4.15* Light-Transmitting Plastics.

10.2.4.15.1

Light-transmitting plastics used as interior wall and ceiling finish shall be permitted based on large-scale fire tests that substantiatethe combustibility characteristics of the plastics for the use intended under actual fire conditions.

10.2.4.15.2

The tests shall be performed on a light transmitting plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration and on the maximumthickness intended for use. (See Section 48.7.)

10.2.5 Trim and Incidental Finish.

10.2.5.1 General.

Interior wall and ceiling trim and incidental finish, other than wall base in accordance with 10.2.5.2 and bulletin boards and posters inaccordance with 10.2.5.3, not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall and ceiling areas of any room or space to which it isapplied shall be permitted to be Class C materials in occupancies where interior wall and ceiling finish of Class A or Class B isrequired.

10.2.5.2 Wall Base.

Interior floor trim material used at the junction of the wall and the floor to provide a functional or decorative border, and notexceeding 6 in. (150 mm) in height, shall meet the requirements for interior wall finish for its location or the requirements for Class IIinterior floor finish as described in 10.2.6.4 using the test described in 10.2.6.3.

10.2.5.2.1

If a Class I floor finish is required, the interior floor trim shall be Class I.

10.2.5.3 Bulletin Boards and Posters.

10.2.5.3.1

Bulletin boards and posters attached directly to the wall shall not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate wall area to which they areapplied.

10.2.5.3.2

The provision of 10.2.5.3.1 shall not apply to artwork and teaching materials in sprinklered educational or day-care occupancies inaccordance with 17.5.5.3, 18.5.5, or 18.6.5.

10.2.6* Interior Floor Finish Testing and Classification.

10.2.6.1*

Carpet and carpet like interior floor finishes shall comply with ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics ofFinished Textile Floor Covering Materials.

10.2.6.2*

Floor coverings, other than carpet for which 10.2.2.2 establishes requirements for fire performance, shall have a minimum critical

radiant flux of 0.1 W/cm2.

10.2.6.3*

Interior floor finishes shall be classified in accordance with 10.2.6.4, based on test results from NFPA 253 or ASTM E648, StandardTest Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source.

10.2.6.4

Interior floor finishes shall be grouped in the classes specified in 10.2.6.4.1 and 10.2.6.4.2 in accordance with the critical radiant fluxrequirements.

10.2.6.4.1 Class I Interior Floor Finish.

Class I interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.45 W/cm2, as determined by the test described in10.2.6.3.


82 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.2.6.4.2 Class II Interior Floor Finish.

Class II interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.22 W/cm2, but less than 0.45 W/cm2, as determined bythe test described in 10.2.6.3.

10.2.6.5

Wherever the use of Class II interior floor finish is required, Class I interior floor finish shall be permitted.

10.2.7 Automatic Sprinklers.

10.2.7.1

Other than as required in Section 10.5, where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section 55.3,Class C interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class B is required, and Class B interior walland ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class A is required.

10.2.7.2

Where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section 55.3, throughout the fire compartment orsmoke compartment containing the interior floor finish, Class II interior floor finish shall be permitted in any location where Class Iinterior floor finish is required, and where Class II is required, the provisions of 10.2.6.2 shall apply.



5000_CCN_15.pdf 5000 CC Note #15


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 15 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Interior Finish and contents (FUR) to do the following:

1. Add correlative references to avoid conflicts. For example, the provision of 10.2.1.1 would provide better guidance if the following was added: “…unless otherwise provided in 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.4.1.2”. Similarly, the text of 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.4.1.2 would be more accurate if wording was added to the effect: “…and the provision of 10.2.1.1 shall not apply.”

2. Revise 10.2.3.2(3) to replace the word “defined” with “described” to read: “Flashover, as described in NFPA 286, shall not occur.” This will make 10.2.3.2 relative to NFPA 286, consistent with 10.2.4.4.2 relative to NFPA 265. NFPA 286 Chapter 3 does not define flashover; its 9.1 Procedure describes flashover as having occurred when any two of five possible criteria are met.

3. Revise 10.2.4.13.2 to add title to ASTM E2579 reference as follows: ASTM E2579 Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Wood Products to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 15-NFPA 5000-2016 [Sections 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The following actions were taken on PC 16 / CC Note No. 15. The numbering reflects the numbered items in the CC Note. 1.The existing language in 10.2.1.1 is appropriate. Additional exceptions should not be added to the text. 2. See SR 4501. 3.See SR 4502.


83 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 15-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Interior Finish and contents (FUR) to do the following:

1. Add correlative references to avoid conflicts. For example, the provision of 10.2.1.1 would provide better guidance if thefollowing was added: “…unless otherwise provided in 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.4.1.2”. Similarly, the text of 10.2.4.1 and 10.2.4.1.2 wouldbe more accurate if wording was added to the effect: “…and the provision of 10.2.1.1 shall not apply.”

2. Revise 10.2.3.2(3) to replace the word “defined” with “described” to read: “Flashover, as described in NFPA 286, shall notoccur.” This will make 10.2.3.2 relative to NFPA 286, consistent with 10.2.4.4.2 relative to NFPA 265. NFPA 286 Chapter 3 doesnot define flashover; its 9.1 Procedure describes flashover as having occurred when any two of five possible criteria are met.

3. Revise 10.2.4.13.2 to add title to ASTM E2579 reference as follows: ASTM E2579 Standard Practice for Specimen Preparationand Mounting of Wood Products to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:03 PM

of 281


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:03 PM

of 281


10.3 Use of Interior Finishes.

10.3.1


(1) Where specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupancies as noted in Chapter 11 and Chapters 15 through 31and 33 through 34

(2) As specified in Section 10.5

10.3.2 * Use of Interior Finishes.

10.3.2.1


(1) Where specified elsewhere in this Code for specific occupancies as noted in Chapter 11 and Chapters 15 through 31and 33 through 34

(2) As specified in Section 10.4 through 10.6

10.3.2.2 *

Interior floor finish shall comply with Section 10.7 under any of the following conditions:

(1) Where floor finish requirements are specified elsewhere in this Code

(2) Where the fire performance of the floor finish cannot be demonstrated to be equivalent to floor finishes with a critical radiant

flux of at least 0.1 W/cm 2


This section needs to be deleted as it has been replaced by text in section 10.2.

Related Item

First Revision No. 5505-NFPA 5000-2015 [Sections 10.2, 10.3, 10.4, 10.5, 10.6, 10.7, 10.8]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Fri Mar 18 17:49:59 EDT 2016

Committee Statement



Statement: This section needs to be deleted as it has been replaced by text in section 10.2.


84 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.4 Interior Wall or Ceiling Finish Testing and Classification.

10.4.1 *

Interior wall or ceiling finish that is required elsewhere in this Code to be Class A, Class B, or Class C shall be classified based ontest results from ASTM E84, Standard Test Method of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , or UL 723, Standardfor Test of Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , or except as indicated in 10.4.1.1 or 10.4.1.2 .

10.4.1.1

Exposed portions of structural members complying with the requirements for Type IV(2HH) construction in accordance with 7.2.5 ofthis Code shall be exempt from the testing and classification provisions of ASTM E84 or UL 723.

10.4.1.2

Interior wall and ceiling finish tested in accordance with NFPA 286, and meeting the conditions of 10.4.5.2 , shall be permitted to beused where a Class A classification in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 is required.

10.4.1.3 *

Fire-retardant coatings shall not be used to obtain compliance with the interior finish requirements of this Code .

10.4.1.4 *

Surfaces of walls, partitions, columns, and ceilings shall be permitted to be finished with factory-applied fire-retardant-coatedproducts that have been listed and labeled to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of ASTM E2768, Standard Test Methodfor Extended Duration Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials , on the coated surface.

10.4.2 *

Products required to be tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 shall be grouped in the classes described in 10.4.2.1through 10.4.2.3 in accordance with their flame spread index and smoke developed index, except as indicated in 10.4.1.2 .

10.4.2.1 Class A Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class A interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 0–25 and a smoke developed index of0–450 and shall include any material classified at 25 or less on the flame spread index test scale and 450 or less on the smokedeveloped index test scale.

10.4.2.2 Class B Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class B interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 26–75 and a smoke developed index of0–450 and shall include any material classified at more than 25 but not more than 75 on the flame spread index test scale and 450 orless on the smoke developed index test scale.

10.4.2.3 Class C Interior Wall and Ceiling Finish.

Class C interior wall and ceiling finishes shall be those finishes with a flame spread index of 76–200 and a smoke developed index of0–450 and shall include any material classified at more than 75 but not more than 200 on the flame spread index test scale and 450or less on the smoke developed index test scale.

10.4.3

The classification of interior finish specified in 10.4.2 shall be that of the basic material used by itself or in combination with othermaterials.

10.4.4

Wherever the use of Class C interior wall and ceiling finish is required, Class A or Class B shall be permitted. Where Class B interiorwall and ceiling finish is required, Class A shall be permitted.

10.4.5 *

Products tested in accordance with NFPA 265, shall comply with the criteria of 10.4.5.1 . Products tested in accordance with NFPA286 shall comply with the criteria of 10.4.5.2 .

10.4.5.1 *

The interior finish shall comply with the following when tested using the Method B test protocol of NFPA 265:


(2) The flame shall not spread to the outer extremities of the samples on the 8 ft by 12 ft (2440 mm by 3660 mm) walls.


(4) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 1000 m 2 .


85 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.4.5.2

The interior finish shall comply with all of the following when tested using the test protocol of NFPA 286:


(2) The flame shall not spread to the outer extremity of the sample on any wall or ceiling.


(4) The peak heat release rate throughout the test shall not exceed 800 kW.

(5) The total smoke released throughout the test shall not exceed 10,764 ft 2 (1000 m 2 ).


This section needs to be deleted as it is repetitive of text that has been revised and is contained in section 10.2.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This section needs to be deleted as it is repetitive of text that has been revised and is contained in section 10.2.


86 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.5 * Specific Materials.

10.5.1 * Textile Wall and Textile Ceiling Materials.

The use of textile materials on walls or ceilings shall comply with one of the following conditions:

(1) Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method forSurface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Textile,Paper or Polymeric (including Vinyl) Wall or Ceiling Coverings, and of Facings and Wood Veneers Intended to be Applied onSite Over a Wood Substrate, to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics, (see 10.4.2 ) , shall be permitted on the walls orceilings of rooms or areas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system.

(2) Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using thespecimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 (see 10.3.2 ) , shall be permitted on partitions that do notexceed three-quarters of the floor-to-ceiling height, or do not exceed 8 ft (2440 mm) in height, whichever is less.

(3) Textile materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using thespecimen preparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted to extend not more than 48 in.(1220 mm) above the finished floor on ceiling-height walls and ceiling-height partitions.

(4) Textile materials shall be permitted on walls and partitions where tested in accordance with NFPA 265. ( See 10.3.5.)

(5) Textile materials shall be permitted on walls, partitions, and ceilings where tested in accordance with NFPA 286. (See10.3.5.)

10.5.2 * Expanded Vinyl Wall and Ceiling Coverings.

The use of expanded vinyl wall or ceiling coverings shall comply with one of the following conditions:

(1) Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.4.2 ), shall be permitted on the walls or ceilings of rooms orareas protected by an approved automatic sprinkler system.

(2) Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted on partitions that do not exceed three-quarters of the floor-to-ceiling height, or do not exceed 8 ft (2440 mm) in height, whichever is less.

(3) Materials meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, using the specimenpreparation and mounting method of ASTM E2404 ( see 10.3.2 ), shall be permitted to extend not more than 48 in. (1220mm) above the finished floor on ceiling-height walls and ceiling-height partitions.

(4) Materials shall be permitted on walls and partitions where tested in accordance with NFPA 265. ( See 10.3.6 .)

(5) Materials shall be permitted on walls, partitions, and ceilings where tested in accordance with NFPA 286. ( See 10.3.5 .)

10.5.3 Cellular or Foamed Plastic.

Cellular or foamed plastic materials shall not be used as interior wall and ceiling finish, unless specifically permitted by 10.5.3.1 or10.5.3.2 . This subsection shall apply to both exposed foamed plastics and to foamed plastics used in conjunction with a textile orvinyl facing or cover.

10.5.3.1

Cellular or foamed plastic materials meeting the definition of foamed plastic insulation shall be permitted where subjected tolarge-scale fire tests that substantiate the combustibility and smoke release characteristics of the material for the use intended underactual fire conditions.

10.5.3.1.1

One of the following fire tests shall be used for assessing the combustibility of cellular or foamed plastic materials as interior finish:

(1) NFPA 286, with the acceptance criteria of 10.4.5.2

(2) UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material [including smoke measurements, with total smoke release not to

exceed 10,764 ft 2 (1000 m 2 )]

(3) UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction

(4) FM Approval 4880, Approval Standard for Class 1 Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels; Plastic Interior FinishMaterials; Plastic Exterior Building Panels; Wall/Ceiling Coating Systems; Interior or Exterior Finish Systems

10.5.3.1.2

The tests shall be performed on a finished foamed plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration, including any coveror facing, and at the maximum thickness intended for use.


87 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

10.5.3.1.3 *

Cellular or foamed plastic materials tested in accordance with UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction , or FMApproval 4880, Approval Standard for Class I Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materialsor Coating, and Exterior Wall Systems , shall also be tested for smoke release using NFPA 286, with the acceptance criterion of10.4.5.2 .

10.5.3.2

Cellular or foamed plastic shall be permitted for trim not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall or ceiling area to which it is

applied, provided that it is not less than 20 lb/ft 3 (320 kg/m 3 ) in density, is limited to 1 ⁄ 2 in. (13 mm) in thickness and 4 in. (100mm) in width, and complies with the requirements for Class A or Class B interior wall and ceiling finish, as described in 10.4.2 ;however, the smoke developed index shall not be limited.

10.5.4 * Light-Transmitting Plastics.

Light-transmitting plastics used as interior wall and ceiling finish shall be permitted based on large-scale fire tests that substantiatethe combustibility characteristics of the plastics for the use intended under actual fire conditions. The tests shall be performed on alight-transmitting plastic assembly related to the actual end-use configuration and on the maximum thickness intended for use. (SeeSection 48.7 .)

10.5.5 Metal Ceiling and Wall Panels.

Listed, factory-finished metal ceiling and wall panels meeting the requirements of Class A when tested in accordance with ASTM E84or UL 723 ( see 10.4.2 ) shall be permitted to be finished with one additional application of paint. These painted panels shall be

permitted for use in areas where Class A interior finishes are required. The total paint thickness shall not exceed 1 ⁄ 28 in. (0.90mm).

10.5.6 Lockers.

10.5.6.1 Combustible Lockers.

Where lockers constructed of combustible materials other than wood are used, the lockers shall be considered interior finish andshall comply with Section 10.2 , except as permitted by 10.5.6.2 .

10.5.6.2 Wood Lockers.

Lockers constructed entirely of wood and of noncombustible materials shall be permitted to be used in any location where interiorfinish materials are required to meet a Class C classification in accordance with 10.4.1 .

10.5.7 Polypropylene (PP) and High Density Polyethylene (HDPE).

Polypropylene and high density polyethylene materials shall not be permitted to be used as interior wall or ceiling finish, unless thematerial complies with the requirements of 10.4.5.2 . The tests shall be performed on a finished assembly and on the maximumthickness intended for use.

10.5.8 Site-Fabricated Stretch Systems.

Site-fabricated stretch systems containing all three components described in the definition in Chapter 3 shall be tested in themanner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.4.1 or 10.4.1.2 . If the materials are tested in accordancewith ASTM E84 or UL 723, specimen preparation and mounting shall be in accordance with ASTM E2573.

10.5.9 Reflective Insulation Materials.

Reflective insulation materials shall be tested in the manner intended for use and shall comply with the requirements of 10.4.1 or10.4.1.2 . If the materials are tested in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723, specimen preparation and mounting shall be inaccordance with ASTM E2599, Standard Practice for Specimen Preparation and Mounting of Reflective Insulation, Radiant Barrier,and Vinyl Stretch Ceiling Materials for Building Applications to Assess Surface Burning Characteristics .


This section needs to be deleted because it is repetitive of what has been incorporated into the revised section 10.2.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



88 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


Statement: This section needs to be deleted because it is repetitive of what has been incorporated into the revised section 10.2.


89 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.6 Trim and Incidental Finish.

10.6.1 General.

Interior wall and ceiling trim and incidental finish, other than wall base in accordance with 10.6.2 and bulletin boards and posters inaccordance with 10.6.3 , not in excess of 10 percent of the specific wall and ceiling areas of any room or space to which it is applied,shall be permitted to be Class C materials in occupancies where interior wall and ceiling finish of Class A or Class B is required

10.6.2 Wall Base.

Interior floor trim material used at the junction of the wall and the floor to provide a functional or decorative border, and not exceeding6 in. (150 mm) in height, shall meet the interior wall finish requirements for its location or the requirements for Class II interior floorfinish, as described in 10.7.4 , using the test described in 10.7.3 . If a Class I floor finish is required, the interior floor trim shall beClass I.

10.6.3 Bulletin Boards and Posters.

10.6.3.1

Bulletin boards and posters attached directly to the wall shall not exceed 20 percent of the aggregate wall area to which they areapplied.

10.6.3.2

The provision of 10.6.3.1 shall not apply to artwork and teaching materials in sprinklered educational or day-care occupancies inaccordance with 17.5.5.3 , 18.5.5 , or 18.6.5 .


Already addressed in 10.2.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Already addressed in 10.2.


90 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.7 * Interior Floor Finish Testing and Classification.

10.7.1 *

Carpet and carpetlike interior floor finishes shall comply with ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics ofFinished Textile Floor Covering Materials .

10.7.2 *

Floor coverings, other than carpet for which 10.3.2 establishes requirements for fire performance, shall have a minimum critical

radiant flux of 0.1 W/cm 2 .

10.7.3 *

Interior floor finishes shall be classified in accordance with 10.7.4 , based on test results from NFPA 253, or ASTM E648, StandardTest Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source .

10.7.4

Interior floor finishes shall be grouped in the classes specified in 10.7.4.1 and 10.7.4.2 in accordance with the critical radiant fluxrequirements.

10.7.4.1 Class I Interior Floor Finish.

Class I interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.45 W/cm 2 , as determined by the test described in10.7.3 .

10.7.4.2 Class II Interior Floor Finish.

Class II interior floor finish shall have a critical radiant flux of not less than 0.22 W/cm 2 , but less than 0.45 W/cm 2 , as determinedby the test described in 10.7.3 .

10.7.5

Wherever the use of Class II interior floor finish is required, Class I interior floor finish shall be permitted.


Already covered in 10.2.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Already covered in 10.2.


91 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


10.8 Automatic Sprinklers.

10.8.1

Other than as required in Section 10.5 , where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section55.3 , Class C interior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class B is required, and Class Binterior wall and ceiling finish materials shall be permitted in any location where Class A is required.

10.8.2

Where an approved automatic sprinkler system is installed in accordance with Section 55.3 throughout the fire compartment orsmoke compartment containing the interior floor finish, Class II interior floor finish shall be permitted in any location where Class Iinterior floor finish is required; and where Class II is required, the provisions of 10.7.2 shall apply.


Already covered in 10.2.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Already covered in 10.2.


92 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


11.1.5.1

Means of egress shall be designed and maintained to provide headroom in accordance with other sections of this Code, and suchheadroom shall be not less than 7 ft 6 in. (2285 mm), with projections . Projections from the ceiling not shall provide a headroomof not less than 6 ft 8 in. (2030 m), with a tolerance of - 3⁄4 in. (-19 mm), above the finished floor.


This comment corrects the text of the provision. Currently the text suggests that a projection may be 6ft 8 in, when it really means that the vertical clearance should not be less than 6 ft 8 in above finished floor. It should be noted that this provision seems to consider door headers to be projections, which they are not. Door openings and clearances are already addressed under accessibility codes. The tolerance issue is not recommended to be deleted, as it was in the Public Input.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment corrects the text of the provision. Currently the text suggests that a projection may be 6ft 8 in, when it reallymeans that the vertical clearance should not be less than 6 ft 8 in above finished floor. It should be noted that this provisionseems to consider door headers to be projections, which they are not. Door openings and clearances are already addressedunder accessibility codes. The tolerance issue is not recommended to be deleted, as it was in the Public Input.


93 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


11.1.6.5 *

Grab Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers.

11.1.6.5.

1 General1 General .

11.1.6.5.1.1

Where Where required by Chapters 15 through 31 , new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers

, for use by occupants,shall be provided with grab bars

complying with.

11.1.6.5.

2 through 11.1.

6.5.5, except as otherwise permitted for showers in 11.1.

6.5.1.2, with all dimensions referring to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stipulated.

11.1.6.5.1.2 *

Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding1 * Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13mm)

, as described in 11.1.6.2 , and it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as a foreseeable condition described inin height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet.

11.1.6.

4, the requirements of5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5

shall apply only if grab bars are installed.

11.1.6.5.1.3 All dimensions are measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stated .

11.1.6.5.

2 Vertical2 Vertical Grab Bar.

A vertical grab bar shall be provided

either installedon the control end wall or the end wall opposite the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,

andor shower ; or ,

as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.1 , or as a free standing, external pole as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.2 .shall be provided as an external vertical pole.

11.1.6.5.2.1 *

Vertical Vertical Grab Bar on

ControlEnd Wall.

(A

) Avertical grab bar

, with a minimum length ofshall be:

(1) 24 in. (610 mm)

, and its lower end


94 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

(1) minimum in length;

(2) located between 36 and 39 in. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished floor

, shall be

(1) measured to its lower end;

(2) installed on the

entry/egress

(1) open side of the

control end wall of the

(1) bathtub, bathtub-shower combination,

and shower unit.

(B)

The grab bar shall be located at least 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally, from any shower curtain rod fixing point on the wall

(1) or shower used for entry and egress; and

(2) located 9 in. (228 mm) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower, measured horizontally from the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, orshower .

Vertical Grab Bar as Free Standing, Vertical11.1.6.5.2.2 *

External Vertical Pole.

A vertical, pole-type grab bar shall be fixed to the floor and either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall and shall be :

(1) installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit ;

(2) located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally

,

(1) of the outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower ; and

(2) located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally

,

(1) of the vertical plane of the control end wall

if there is such a wall

(1) .

11.1.6.5.3

Back Wall Grab Bar.

For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a diagonal or horizontal grab bar shall be providedon the back wall

either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in 11.

1.6.5.3.1 or as a horizontal grab bar as specified in 11.1.6.5.3.2 .

11.1.6.5.3.1 *

Diagonal Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall.

(A)

A A diagonal grab bar shall be

installed on the back wall with a minimum length of:

(1) 24 in. (600 mm)

with

(1) minimum in length;

(2) located so that its higher end

placed closer


95 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

(1) is closest to the control end wall

and

(1) ;

(2) located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall,

with a height of

(1)

(2) located 25 in.

to

(1) (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635 mm

to

(1) and 685 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub

.

(B)

The lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height of 8 in. to

(1) ;

(2) located so that its lower end is 8 in. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub ; and

(3) located 28 in.

to

(1) (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710 mm

to

(1) and 760 mm) maximum from the control end wall.

11.1.6.5.3.

2 2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall.

A horizontal grab bar shall be

installed on the back wall at a height of:

(1) located 8 in.

to

(1) (205 mm) minimum and 10 in. (

205 mm to

(1) 255 mm) maximum high above the bathtub rim

with

(1) ; and

(2) located so that one end

located a maximum of

(1) is 12 in. (305 mm) maximum from the control end wall and the other end is located

a maximum of

(1) 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite, or head, end of the bathtub.

11.1.6.5.4 *

Grab Bar Details.

11.1.6.5.4.1

Grab Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1

1 ⁄ 41⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm).

11.1.6.5.4.

2 If2 Where attached to a wall,


96 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

thegrab

barbars shall provide a

minimumclearance for hand grasp of 1

1 ⁄ 21⁄2 in. (38 mm)

.

11.1.6.5.4.3

The size and clearance dimensions required by 11.1.6.5.4.1 and 11.1.6.5.4.2 shall be provided, as aminimum

, within the height requirements range and the minimum length requirements range of the other provisions of 11.

1.6.5.

11.1.6.5.

5 Grab5 Grab Bar Structural Loading.

Grab bars shall be designed and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with other provisions of this Code .



Grab_Bars-Legislative_Text_4-25-16.docx Word Doc in legislative text to more clearly show the proposed changes.


NFPA's Disability Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC) supports the concept of the first revision but has voted unanimously to propose re-writing the section so that it is workable, clear, and concise.

Related Item

First Revision No. 6011-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 11.1.6.4]


Submitter Full Name: Allan Fraser

Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Affilliation: Staff Liaison for NFPA's Disabity Access Review and Advisory Committee (DARAC)

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: The SR incorporates PC-92 and editorial revisions for consistency with the Code.


97 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

11.1.6.5 * Grab Bars for Bathtubs, Bathtub-Shower Combinations, and Showers. 11.1.6.5.1 General. 11.1.6.5.1.1 Where required by Chapters 15 through 31, new bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, and showers, for use by occupants, shall be provided with grab bars complying. 11.1.6.5.1.1.1* Grab bars are not required in showers where the transition from the room floor to the shower floor does not exceed 0.5 in. (13 mm) in height and all shower surfaces are slip resistant when wet. 11.1.6.5.1.2 Where provided, grab bars shall comply with 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5, except as

otherwise permitted for showers in . 11.1.6.5.1.2, with all3 All dimensions referringare measured to the centerline of the grab bar unless otherwise stipulatedstated. 11.1.6.5.1.2* Where a dedicated shower does not expose users to changes in elevation exceeding 0.5 inch (13 mm), as described in 11.1.6.2, and, it provides slip resistance for all surfaces when wet, as described in 11.1.6.4, the requirements of 11.1.6.5.2 through 11.1.6.5.5 shall apply only if grab bars are installed.

11.1.6.5.2 Vertical Grab Bar. A vertical grab bar shall be provided and shall be installed either on the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.1 or as a free standing, external pole as specified in 11.1.6.5.2.2. 11.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on Control End Wall.

(A) A vertical grab bar, the end wall opposite the 24 in. (610 mm) long minimum, shall be installed on the

entry/egress side of the control end wall of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit.

The lower end of the grab bar; or, shall be provided as an external vertical pole. 11.1.6.5.2.1* Vertical Grab Bar on End Wall.

A vertical grab bar shall be: 1. 24 in. (610 mm) minimum in length; 1.2. located between 36 in. min. and 39 in. max. (915 and 990 mm) above the finished

floor. measured to its lower end; 3. (B) The grab bar shall be installed on the open side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower

combination, or shower used for entry and egress; and 2.4.located at least 69 in. (150228 mm),) minimum and 12 in. (300 mm) maximum

from the open entry and egress side of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower, measured horizontally, from any the exterior plane of the bathtub, bathtub-shower curtain rod fixing point on the wallcombination, or shower.

11.1.6.5.2.2* Vertical Grab Bar as Floor MountedExternal Vertical Pole. A vertical, pole-type grab bar shall be fixed to the floor and, either the room ceiling or an adjacent wall. The vertical bar and shall be :

1. installed outside of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination, or shower unit;

of 281

2. located within 6 in. (150 mm), measured horizontally from of the outside of the outer edge of the bathtub, bathtub-shower combination or shower. Where a control end

wall is provided, the vertical grab bar shall be , or shower; and 1.3.located within 30 in. (760 mm), measured horizontally fromof the vertical plane of

the control end wall. 11.1.6.5.3 Back Wall Grab Bar. For bathtubs and bathtub-shower combinations bounded on three sides by walls, a grab bar shall be provided on the back wall either as a diagonal grab bar as specified in

11.1.6.5.3.1 or as aor horizontal grab bar as specified in shall be provided on the back wall. 11.1.6.5.3.2.

11.1.6.5.3.1* 1* Diagonal Grab Bar on Back Wall. (A) A diagonal grab bar shall be installed on the back wall with a minimum length of :

1. 24 in. (600 mm) withminimum in length; 2. located so that its higher end placed closeris closest to the control end wall and ; 3. located a maximum of 12 in. (305 mm) from the control end wall, with a height of 1.4.located 25 toin. (635 mm) minimum and 27 in. (635 tomm and 685 mm)

maximum above the rim of the bathtub.; 5. (B) The located so that its lower end of the diagonal grab bar shall be located at a height ofis

8 toin. minimum and 10 in. (205 mm to 255 mm) maximum above the rim of the bathtub; and

2.6.located 28 toin. (711 mm) minimum and 30 in. (710 tomm and 760 mm) maximum from the control end wall.

11.1.6.5.3.2 Horizontal Grab Bar on Back Wall. A horizontal grab bar shall be installed on the

back wall at a height of: 1. located 8 in. min.(205 mm) minimum and 10 in. max (205 and (255 mm) maximum

high above the bathtub rim. One; and 1.2.located so that one end of the grab bar shall be located a maximum ofis 12 in. (305 mm)

maximum from the control end wall and the other end shall beis located a maximum

of 24 in. (610 mm) maximum from the opposite (, or head), end of the bathtub. 11.1.6.5.4* Grab Bar Details. 11.1.6.5.4.1 Grab bars shall be circular in cross section with a minimum diameter of 1 1/⁄4 in. (32 mm) and a maximum diameter of 2 in. (51 mm). 11.1.6.5.4.2 If, Where attached to a wall, the grab barbars shall provide a minimum clearance, for hand grasp, of 1 1/⁄2 inchesin. (38 mm).) minimum. 11.1.6.5.4.3 The size and clearance dimensions required by 11.1.6.5.4.1 and 11.1.6.5.4.2 Grab Bar Structural Loading. Grab bars shall be provided, as a minimum, within the height requirements ranger and the minimum

length requirements range of thedesigned and constructed to the structural loading conditions in accordance with other provisions of 11.1.6.5this Code.

of 281


11.2.1.1.2

Every door opening and every principal entrance that is required to serve as an exit shall be designed and constructed so that theway path of egress travel is obvious and direct. Windows that, because of their physical configuration or design and the materialsused in their construction, have the potential to be mistaken for door openings shall be made inaccessible to the occupants bybarriers or railings.


The term “path” is used more commonly, such as in section 3.3 for definitions, section 11.1 for means of egress, section 12.2 for accessibility, and chapter 16 for common paths of travel, etc.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The word 'way' is used in the definition of 'means of egress'.


98 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


11.2.1.5.3

Locks, if provided, shall not require the use of a key, a tool, or special knowledge or effort for operation from the egress side.



5000_CCN_17.pdf 5000 CC Note #17


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 17 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review the additional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FR 3004.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 17-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 11.2.1.5.3]

First Revision No. 3004-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The comment is to be routed to the occupancy chapter committees. No action needed by BLD-MEA.


99 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 17-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.1.5.3 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the occupancy committees (AXM, BCF, DET, END, RES, MER, IND, HEA) to review theadditional door locking allowances that are being proposed in FR 3004.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:05 PM

of 281



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:05 PM

of 281


11.2.1.5.11

Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:

(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before the other.

(2) Approved automatic flush bolts shall be used and arranged such that both of the following criteria are met:

(3) The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door .

(4) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.

(5) The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egress sideof the door.

(6) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.



5000_CCN_18.pdf 5000 CC Note No. 18


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 18 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 to eliminate duplicate requirements:

11.2.1.5.11 Where pairs of door leaves are required in a means of egress, one of the following criteria shall be met:

(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before the other.


(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egress side of the door.

(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA 101.These actions will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 18 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 to eliminate duplicate requirements:


(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before theother.


100 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door.

(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation. Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA101.



101 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to consider editorially revising Section 11.2.1.5.11 toeliminate duplicate requirements:


(1) Each leaf of the pair shall be provided with a releasing device that does not depend on the release of one door before theother.


(a)The door leaf equipped with the automatic flush bolts shall have no doorknob or surface-mounted hardware on the egressside of the door.

(b) Unlatching of any leaf shall not require more than one operation.

Change is consistent with Section 7.2.1.5.11 in NFPA 101.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:06 PM

of 281

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:06 PM

of 281


11.2.1.7.1

Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exit hardware, suchhardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of which extends across the cross bar orpush pad not less than one-half of the width of the door leaf.

(2) It shall be mounted not less than 34 in. (865 mm), and not more than 48 in. (1220 mm), above the floor.

(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches.



5000_CCN_19.pdf 5000 CC Note #19


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 19 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changes made to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101 as follows:

11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exit hardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not less than one-half of the width of the door leaf.


(3) It shall be constructed so that a horizontal force not to exceed 15 lbf (67 N) actuates the cross bar or push pad and latches


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 19 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changes made to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101as follows:

11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exithardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not lessthan one-half of the width of the door leaf.



102 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




103 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Means of Egress (MEA) to revise Section 11.2.1.7 to be consistent with changesmade to Section 7.2.1.7 in NFPA 101 as follows:

11.2.1.7.1 Where a side-hinged or pivoted swinging door assembly is required to be equipped with panic hardware or fire exithardware, such hardware shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) It shall consist of a cross bar or push pad, with the length of the actuating portion of the cross bar or push pad not less thanone-half of the width of the door leaf.




Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:08 PM

of 281


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:08 PM

of 281


11.2.1.9.2 Self-Closing or Self-Latching Door Leaf Operation.

Where door leaves are required to be self-closing or self-latching and are operated by power upon the approach of a person, or areprovided with power-assisted manual operation, they shall be permitted in the means of egress under the following conditions:

(1) Door leaves can be opened manually in accordance with 11.2.1.9.1 to allow egress travel in the event of power failure.

(2) Door leaves remain in the closed position, unless actuated or opened manually.

(3) When actuated, door leaves remain open for not more than 30 seconds.

(4) Door Upon operation of approved smoke detectors, door leaves held open for any period of time close — shall close and thepower-assist mechanism ceases to function — upon operation of approved shall be deactivated. The smoke detectors shall beinstalled in such a way as to detect smoke on either side of the door opening in accordance with the provisions of NFPA 72 .

(5) Door leaves required to be self-latching are either self-latching or become self-latching upon operation of approved smokedetectors per 11.2.1.9.2(4).

(6) Power-assisted swinging door assemblies shall comply with BHMA/ANSI A156.19, Power Assist and Low Energy PowerOperated Doors.


As written, the provision is confusing. The use of hyphens amplifies the confusion. This clarifies the intent of the provision.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The proposed revisions do not clarify the intent and will not correlate with NFPA 101.


104 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 117-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 11.2.2.2.1.2 ]



Add new section 11.2.2.2.1.2 as follows:

11.2.2.2.1.2 Emergency Stair Travel Devices

11.2.2.2.1.2.1 Number and Location.

11.2.2.2.1.2.1.1 All buildings that are two storys or more above grade and that are accessed by the public for goods and services, orthat have employees working on site, shall have an emergency stair travel device on each floor at each stairway.

11.2.2.2.1.2.1.2 There shall be one additional emergency stair travel device provided for each employee who will need to use one inan evacuation. These devices shall be located in the employee’s office or at the nearest stair to the employee’s office at theirdiscretion.

11.2.2.2.1.2.2 All devices shall comply with ANSI/RESNA ED-1: 2013 .

11.2.2.2.1.2.3 Storage cabinets for such devices shall not be permitted to be locked at any time.

11.2.2.2.1.2.4 One manual wheelchair shall be located at each stairway at the floor of discharge and available, without requiring theuser to have a key or special knowledge, such that a user of an emergency stair travel device can be transferred to the manualwheelchair to travel from the stairway at the floor of discharge to the outside.

11.2.2.2.1.2.5 All members of an emergency planning team , if one exists, and all personnel who will be occupants or operators ofthe device shall be trained at least once each year on using the device and transferring those who may need to use the device in anemergency.

Statement:

Most of this language was submitted as Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2]. In response to thecommittee’s comment, this Public Comment addresses the committee’s concern about office buildings and others that might not havethe public entering to obtain goods and services but simply has employees now, or may in the future, who have mobility disabilities.

The current Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2 - Reserved would become No. 11.2.2.2.1.3.


The proposed revision would increase the availability of emergency stair travel devices. Referencing of the ANSI/RESNA ED-1:2013 standard would ensure the quality of the devices provided.

Most of this language was submitted as Public Input No. 187-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 11.2.2.2.1.2]. In response to the committee’s comment, this Public Comment addresses the committee’s concern about office buildings and others that might not have the public entering to obtain goods and services but simply has employees now, or may in the future, who have mobility disabilities.

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Glenn Hedman

Organization: University of Illinois at Chicago

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sun May 15 21:22:34 EDT 2016

Committee Statement


Resolution: The comment does not address many of the items raised in the committee response to PI-187.


105 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


11.2.2.2.3.2

Spiral stairs shall be permitted, provided that all of the following criteria are met:

(1) Riser heights shall not exceed 7 in. (180 mm).

(2) The stairway shall have a tread depth of not less than 11 in. (280 mm) for a portion of the stairway width sufficient to provideegress capacity for the occupant load served in accordance with 11.3.3.1.

(3) At the outer side of the stairway, an additional 10 1⁄2 in. (265 mm) of width shall be provided clear to the other handrail, and thiswidth shall not be included as part of the required egress capacity.

(4) Handrails complying with 11.2.2.4 shall be provided on both sides of the spiral stairway.

(5) The inner handrail shall be located within 24 in. (610 mm), measured horizontally, of the point where a tread depth of not lessthan 11 in. (280 mm) is provided.

(6) The turn of the stairway shall be such that descending users have the outer handrail at their right side.


Spiral staircases can be designed and specified in the clockwise and counter clockwise direction for the descending user. The handrail will be on the wider side of the tread in either case.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The requirement is intended to be consistent with the 'keep to right' practice of pedestrians.


106 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 80-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 12.1 [Excluding any Sub-Sections] ]

This chapter contains all of the additional text for requirements added by the U.S. Department of Justice to the 2004 ADA/ABA-AGpublished by the U.S. Access Board in creating and adopting the 2010 ADA Standards published by the U.S. Department of Justice.Where technical requirements are covered in

[DELETE CHAPTER 12 AND REPLACE WITH THE FOLLOWING:]

Buildings and facilities and additions to and altered portions of existing buildings and facilities shall be in compliance with ICC/ANSIA117.1

, they have been referenced

.

Requirements of the HUD Fair Housing Act Design Manual have been re-written in code language and incorporated in appropriatesections. [ 2010 ADA STANDARDS (DOJ): 201]

The number in brackets at the end of each paragraph refers to the paragraph number of the source document.


PI 137 proposed the use of ICC/ANSI A117.1, which is a safe harbor document. The Technical Committee statement said that the PI “appears to create more restrictive requirements than are currently in place.” Thus, the Technical Committee is indicating that the provisions in NFPA 5000 are less restrictive than the DOJ safe harbor document, which means that the provisions of chapter 12 do not meet the minimum federal requirements. This Public Comment intends to upgrade chapter 12 to meet minimum federal requirements.

Related Item

Public Input No. 137-NFPA 5000-2015 [Chapter 12]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: In the 2005 cycle for NFPA 5000 Building Construction and Safety Code, the Building Systems TC intended to use: 1. all of thescoping requirements from ADA/ABA -AG 7-23-2004, 2. the technical requirements of ICC/ANSI A117.1 -2003 with the exceptionof 605.2 that has been replaced by the text from 605.2 of ADA/ABA -AG 7-23-2004, 3. the technical requirements contained inADA/ABA-AG 7-23-2004 not contained in A117.1 -2003, and 4. the scoping requirements of the Federal Fair Housing Act. Thecommittee’s intent was to essentially “extract” all the text from the Federal documents and editorially re-work it so that it workedtogether. The language of Chapter 12 is currently updated and extracted from two Federal documents, the 2012 DOJ ADAGuidelines and the “Fair Housing Guidelines”. Where the 2012 DOJ ADA Guidelines requirements mirrored ANSI A117.1 -2009requirements, the 2012 DOJ ADA Guidelines text was not extracted but specific references to the appropriate section(s) ofA.117.1 were inserted in place thereof. As the two Federal documents were written by two separate agencies, significant editorialchanges were needed to meld them into coherent text in NFPA 5000. Since the actual requirements were not written by theNFPA technical committee, the work is really editorial to assure clarity and consistency between the Federal provisions. Chapter12 covers the complete spectrum of requirements for buildings and facilities. A117.1-2009 does not contain any scopingrequirements and to have that comprise the entire text and only text of Chapter 12 would mean that the technical requirements inA117.1 would be unenforceable which would be completely unacceptable


107 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 21-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 16.3.4.3.7 ]



5000_CCN_20.pdf 5000 CC Note #20


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 20 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Assembly Occupancies (AXM) to consider the Negative ballot of Humble relative to dining spaces open to cooking areas; whether fireplaces are fuel-burning appliances; permanently installed versus portable equipment; use of the term “centrally-located” without respect to the size of the space; and whether some provisions have been duplicated.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: The revisions respond to correlating committee note CCN-20. See attachment for new A.16.3.4.4.1(3).


108 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Assembly Occupancies (AXM) to consider the Negative ballot of Humble relative todining spaces open to cooking areas; whether fireplaces are fuel-burning appliances; permanently installed versus portableequipment; use of the term “centrally-located” without respect to the size of the space; and whether some provisions have beenduplicated.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:09 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:09 PM

of 281


17.2.1.5

Where bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers are present, grab bars shall be provided in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .


Not every shower space is necessarily required to be handicapped accessible, a gymnasium locker room for example may only need for one (or some) of the showers to be accessible, not every single one. If the bathtub or shower is required to be accessible then grab bars are already required and it doesn’t need to be re-stated again here. If the intention is to require grab bars in every bathtub and shower (even those which are not required to be accessible) then there is not sufficient information to support the change.





Related Item

First Revision No. 3003-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 17.2.1.4]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Unknown Reason

Resolution: Consistent with 101. The provisions for grab bars provided in Chapter 11 are necessary for safety and are not strictly anaccessibility issue. Statistics presented to the Committee support the need to this section to be included in the Code.


109 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 22-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3 ]



5000_CCN_21.pdf 5000 CC Note #21


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 21 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Negative ballot of Roeper to include the term “without special knowledge”; and reference the mounting height of the operable parts of the releasing mechanism rather than the location of the release itself.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 21-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The Committee supports the First Draft text with minor modifications as directed by the Correlating Committee. The chargingstatement has been updated to clarify that classroom doors are permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry only if thelocking means is approved and all of the criteria in the list are met. Numbered items were updated with the word "shall" foreditorial correction. Text was added to clarify that the unlocking and unlatching operation in the classroom cannot require the useof key, tool, special knowledge or effort which is consistent with other locking and latching provisions in Chapter 11. A minimumheight for the location of the releasing mechanism, consistent with Chapter 11, was added to ensure that the mechanism wasnot located on the floor or low on the door and the text was updated to clarify that it is the releasing mechanism that must belocated within the 34-48" range. Item 7 has been updated to delete 'by staff' from the First Revision as it was too specific. It maynot just be staff opening the door, it could be first responders for example.

The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security – Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry and accepted the need that a second locking means may be needed for existing buildings. The multipleprovisions proposed as part of 17.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailedcriteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar withtraditional egress needs.


110 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 21-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Negative ballot ofRoeper to include the term “without special knowledge”; and reference the mounting height of the operable parts of the releasingmechanism rather than the location of the release itself.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:10 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:10 PM

of 281


17.2.2.2.4 Classroom Door Locking to Prevent Unwanted Entry.

Classroom doors shall be permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(1) The locking means is approved.

(2) The locking means can be engaged without opening the door.

(3) The unlocking and unlatching from the classroom side of the door can be accomplished without the use of a key or tool.

(4) The unlocking and unlatching requires not more than one releasing operation.

(5) The unlocking and unlatching means are mounted at a height not exceeding 48 in. (1220 mm) above the finished floor.

(6) Locks, if remotely engaged, can be unlocked from the classroom side.

(7) The door is capable of being unlocked and opened from outside the room by staff with the necessary key or other credential.

(8) The locking means does not modify the door closer, panic hardware, or fire exit hardware.

(9) Modifications to fire door assemblies, including door hardware, shall be in accordance with NFPA 80.

(10) An emergency action plan shall be provided, addressing the use of the locking and unlocking means, from within and outsidethe room.

(11) Staff is drilled in the engagement and release of the locking means, from within and outside the room, as part of emergencyegress drills.


This is a good start for a conversation that needs to happen, however until more issues are resolved such as classrooms which serve as an intervening spaces for egress, and emergency responder access to classrooms, and many more issues related to potential unintended consequences (there is tremendous potential to cause harm), the section should not be added.

Related Item

First Revision No. 3004-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 17.2.2.2.3.3]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The Committee supports the First Draft text with minor modifications as directed by the Correlating Committee. The chargingstatement has been updated to clarify that classroom doors are permitted to be locked to prevent unwanted entry only if thelocking means is approved and all of the criteria in the list are met. Numbered items were updated with the word "shall" foreditorial correction. Text was added to clarify that the unlocking and unlatching operation in the classroom cannot require the useof key, tool, special knowledge or effort which is consistent with other locking and latching provisions in Chapter 11. A minimumheight for the location of the releasing mechanism, consistent with Chapter 11, was added to ensure that the mechanism wasnot located on the floor or low on the door and the text was updated to clarify that it is the releasing mechanism that must belocated within the 34-48" range. Item 7 has been updated to delete 'by staff' from the First Revision as it was too specific. It maynot just be staff opening the door, it could be first responders for example.

The Workshop on School Safety, Codes and Security – Final Report documented the need to lock classroom doors againstunwanted entry and accepted the need that a second locking means may be needed for existing buildings. The multipleprovisions proposed as part of 17.2.2.2.4 address the concerns for accomplishing door locking in a safe manner. The detailedcriteria will weed out the dangerous hardware and locking means being promoted in the marketplace by those unfamiliar withtraditional egress needs.


111 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


112 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


17.3.2.1 General.

Rooms or spaces for the storage, processing, or use of materials specified in the list that follows shall be protected in accordancewith the following:

(1) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour or protectionof such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.15 in the following areas:

(2) Boiler and furnace rooms, other than those enclosing only air-handling equipment

(3) Rooms or spaces used for the storage of combustible supplies in quantities deemed hazardous by the authority havingjurisdiction

(4) Rooms or spaces used for the storage of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantities deemedhazardous by recognized standards

(5) Janitor closets, other than those protected by automatic sprinklers, which are permitted to have doors with ventilatinglouvers

(6) Separation from the remainder of the building by fire barriers having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour and protectionof such rooms by automatic extinguishing systems as specified in Section 8.15 in the following areas:

(7)

(8) Maintenance shops, including woodworking and painting areas

(9) Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of combustible supplies deemed hazardous by the authority havingjurisdiction

(10) Rooms or spaces used for processing or use of hazardous materials or flammable or combustible liquids in quantitiesdeemed hazardous by recognized standards

(11) Where automatic extinguishing is used to meet the requirements of 17.3.2.1 (1) or (2), protection permitted in accordance with55.3.1.2


This comment proposes to delete redundant text "specified in the list that follows".

Related Item

First Revision No. 3007-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 17.3.2.1]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This comment proposes to delete redundant text "specified in the list that follows".

* Laundries


113 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


17.3.4.4 Carbon Monoxide Detection Systems.

17.3.4.4.1

Carbon monoxide alarms or carbon monoxide detectors in accordance with Section 55.11 shall be provided in new educationaloccupancies in the locations specified as follows:

(1) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed on the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances

(2) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed centrally located within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air registerfrom a permanently installed, fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attachedgarage

(4) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to an attached garage with aseparation wall constructed of gypsum wallboard.

17.3.4.4.2

Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 17.3.4.4.1(1) , the alarm signal shall be automatically transmittedto an approved on-site location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720.

17.3.4.4.3

Carbon monoxide detectors as specified in 17.3.4.4.1 shall not be required in the following locations:

(1) Garages

(2) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are open parking structures as defined in 3.3.633.11.4

(3) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are mechanically ventilated in accordance with the applicablemechanical code

(4) Occupiable spaces that are separated from attached garages by walls constructed of gypsum wallboard where the garage is anopen parking structure as defined in 3.3.633.11.4.

(5) Occupiable spaces that are separated from attached garages by walls constructed of gypsum wallboard where the garage ismechanically ventilated in accordance with the mechanical code.



5000_CCN_22.pdf 5000 CC Note #22


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 22 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Negative ballot ofMertens relative to detector installation locations and coverage areas.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected


114 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Resolution: The Committee reviewed the ballot comments, and supports the existing code language. Applicable codes and standards(NFPA 720, NFPA 101, and the UL Product Standards) provide adequate direction for CO detectors in occupancies other thanresidential. UL 2075, the UL product standard for CO detectors, contains the same alarm thresholds for these detectors as youwould find in detectors supplied at consumer retail stores (residential applications). These requirements can be specificallyfound in section 15.1 in UL 2075. Section 55.11 in NFPA 5000 refers to NFPA 720, which requires each CO device to be incompliance with UL 2075 or 2034. In addition, a project completed by the Fire Protection Research Foundation in 2007,"Development of a Technical Basis for Carbon Monoxide Detector Siteing", provides the documentation that supports thebehavior of CO and detector location criteria.


115 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to consider the Negative ballot ofMertens relative to detector installation locations and coverage areas.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:11 PM

of 281



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:11 PM

of 281


17.3.4.4 Carbon Monoxide Detection Systems.

17.3.4.4.1

Carbon monoxide alarms or carbon monoxide detectors in accordance with Section 55.11 shall be provided in new educationaloccupancies in the locations specified as follows:

(1) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed on the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances

(2) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed centrally located within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air registerfrom a permanently installed, fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attachedgarage

(4) Carbon monoxide detectors shall be centrally located within occupiable spaces adjacent to an attached garage with aseparation wall constructed of gypsum wallboard.

17.3.4.4.2

Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 17.3.4.4.1(1) , the alarm signal shall be automatically transmittedto an approved on-site location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720.

17.3.4.4.3

Carbon monoxide detectors as specified in 17.3.4.4.1 shall not be required in the following locations:

(1) Garages

(2) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are open parking structures as defined in 3.3.633.11.4

(3) Occupiable spaces with communicating attached garages that are mechanically ventilated in accordance with the applicablemechanical code

(4) Occupiable spaces that are separated from attached garages by walls constructed of gypsum wallboard where the garage is anopen parking structure as defined in 3.3.633.11.4.

(5) Occupiable spaces that are separated from attached garages by walls constructed of gypsum wallboard where the garage ismechanically ventilated in accordance with the mechanical code.



5000_CCN_23.pdf 5000 CC Note #23


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 23 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Stashak and the Negative ballot of Shirey so as to revise Section 55.11 CO Detection and Warning Equipment to provide guidance to the various occupancy technical committees on installation and listing standards for CO detection devices in other than residential living units.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Rejected


116 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Action:

Resolution: The Committee reviewed the ballot comments, and supports the existing code language. Applicable codes and standards(NFPA 720, NFPA 101, and the UL Product Standards) provide adequate direction for CO detectors in occupancies other thanresidential. UL 2075, the UL product standard for CO detectors, contains the same alarm thresholds for these detectors as youwould find in detectors supplied at consumer retail stores (residential applications). These requirements can be specificallyfound in section 15.1 in UL 2075. Section 55.11 in NFPA 5000 refers to NFPA 720, which requires each CO device to be incompliance with UL 2075 or 2034. In addition, a project completed by the Fire Protection Research Foundation in 2007,"Development of a Technical Basis for Carbon Monoxide Detector Siteing", provides the documentation that supports thebehavior of CO and detector location criteria.


117 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) to consider the Affirmativewith Comment ballot of Stashak and the Negative ballot of Shirey so as to revise Section 55.11 CO Detection and WarningEquipment to provide guidance to the various occupancy technical committees on installation and listing standards for COdetection devices in other than residential living units.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:12 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:12 PM

of 281


18.2.1.2

Where bathtubs, bathtub-shower combinations, or showers are present, grab bars shall be provided in accordance with theprovisions of 11.1.6.5 .


Not every shower space is necessarily required to be handicapped accessible. If the bathtub or shower is required to be accessible then grab bars are already required and it doesn’t need to be re-stated again here. If the intention is to require grab bars in every bathtub and shower (even those which are not required to be accessible) then there is not sufficient information to support the change.



Public Comment No. 81-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 17.2.1.5] similar issue


Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Consistent with 101. The provisions for grab bars provided in Chapter 11 are necessary for safety and are not strictly anaccessibility issue. Statistics presented to the Committee support the need to this section to be included in the Code.


118 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


18.6.3.4 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems.

18.6.3.4.1

Smoke alarms shall be installed within day-care homes in accordance with 55.2.2. 10 and 55.2.2. 6.

18.6.3.4.2

Where the day-care home is located within a building of another occupancy, such as in an apartment building or office building, anycorridors serving the day-care home shall be provided with a smoke detection system in accordance with Section 55.2, except asotherwise provided in 18 . 6.3.4.3.

18.6.3.

18.6.3.4. 3

The corridor smoke detection system addressed in

4

.2 shall not be required where all of the following conditions are met:

(1) The day-care home is in a building of another occupancy that is not required to have a fire alarm system by some otherprovision of this Code.

(2) Smoke alarms are installed in accordance with 55.2.2.10 in the corridor serving the day-care home.

(3) Smoke alarms are installed within the day-care home as required by 18.6.3.4.1 .

(4) Additional smoke alarms are installed within the day-care home within 15 ft (4.6 m) of all sleeping rooms.

(5) The smoke alarms required by 18.6.3.4.3(2) , 18.6.3.4.3(3) , and 18.6.3.4.3(4) are interconnected as required by NFPA 72so that each sounds an alarm when any of these smoke alarms detects smoke.

18.6.3.4.4

Single-station or multiple-station smoke alarms or smoke detectors shall be provided in all rooms used for sleeping in accordance with55.2.2.6.

18.6.3.4.5

Single-station or multiple-station carbon monoxide alarms or detectors shall be provided in accordance with Section 55.11 in day-carehomes where client sleeping occurs and one or both of the following conditions exist:

(1) Fuel-fired equipment is present.

(2) An enclosed parking structure is attached to the day-care home.


18.6.3.4.1: Section 55.2.2.6 only requires a manual pull station, it is not a section that provides requirements for smoke alarm installations in day-care homes.18.6.3.4.3 (1): This makes no sense. Doesn’t the more restrictive occupancy requirement apply? Otherwise by that logic you could put a less hazardous occupancy within a building of a more hazardous occupancy and nullify the requirements of the more hazardous use, that is not the typical approach and the only explanation is that it would cost less. There doesn't seem to be a technical justification for lessening the safety requirements of smoke detectors. (Note that the committee statement in Public Input No. 144-NFPA 5000-2015 [ Section No. 23.1.3.3 ] concerning alarms in lodging or rooming houses states “In mixed occupancies the more restrictive requirements must be met throughout the building”)18.6.3.4.3 (2): The first sentence says smoke detectors shall not be required in corridors where (2) smoke alarms are installed in the corridors.18.6.3.4.3 (3): This says if they are installed in the day-care then they are not required in the corridor that serves the day-care?18.6.3.4.3 (4) & (5): There doesn't seem to be any reason to negate the need for smoke detectors in the corridor serving the day-care, and the only reason given was to save cost, I would need to see some more information pertaining to the reason before lessening the safety requirements of smoke detectors.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:


119 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: The committee supports the substantiation provided for the First Revision. No additional change is needed.


120 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



121 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

19.2.3.2*


122 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Aisles, corridors, and ramps required for exit access in a hospital or nursing home shall be not less than 8 ft (2440 mm) in clear andunobstructed width, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

(8) Projections into the required width shall be permitted for wheeled equipment, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(9) The wheeled equipment does not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 60 in. (1525 mm).

(10) The health care occupancy fire safety plan and training program address the relocation of the wheeled equipment during afire or similar emergency.

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)

(15)

(16)

(17)

(18)

(19)

(20)

(21)

(22)

(23)

(24) Nursing home corridors shall be permitted to be not less than 6 ft (1830 mm) wide in smoke compartments housing not morethan 30 patients.

(25) Cross-corridor door openings in corridors with a required minimum width of 6 ft (1830 mm) shall have a clear width of not lessthan 64 in. (1625 mm) for pairs of doors or a clear width of not less than 32 in. (810 mm) for a single door.

* Aisles, corridors, and ramps in adjunct areas not intended for the housing, treatment, or use of inpatients shall be not less than44 in. (1120 mm) in clear and unobstructed width.

* Projections from the corridor wall shall be permitted by one of the following:

Noncontinuous projections not more than 4 in. (100 mm) from the corridor wall, positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm)above the floor, shall be permitted.

Noncontinuous projections of more than 4 in. (100 mm) but not more than 6 in. (150 mm) from the corridor wall shall bepermitted provided that both of the following are met:

The projecting item is positioned not less than 38 in. (965 mm) above the floor

A vertical extension is provided below the projection such that the extension has a leading edge that is within 4 in.(100 mm) of the leading edge of the projection at a point that is 27 in. (685 mm) maximum above the floor

* Exit access within a room or suite of rooms complying with the requirements of 19.2.5 shall be permitted.

* The wheeled equipment is limited to the following:

Equipment in use and carts in use

Medical emergency equipment not in use

Patient lift and transport equipment

* Where the corridor width is at least 8 ft (2440 mm), projections into the required width shall be permitted for fixed furniture,provided that all of the following conditions are met:

The fixed furniture is securely attached to the floor or to the wall.

The fixed furniture does not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 6 ft (1830 mm), except as permittedby 19.2.3.2(2) .

The fixed furniture is located only on one side of the corridor.

The fixed furniture is grouped such that each grouping does not exceed an area of 50 ft 2 (4.6 m 2 ).

The fixed furniture groupings addressed in 19.2.3.2(5)(d) are separated from each other by a distance of at least 10 ft(3050 mm).

* The fixed furniture is located so as to not obstruct access to building service and fire protection equipment.

Corridors throughout the smoke compartment are protected by an electrically supervised automatic smoke detectionsystem in accordance with 18.3.4 , or the fixed furniture spaces are arranged and located to allow direct supervision by thefacility staff from a nurses’ station or similar space.

* Cross-corridor door openings in corridors with a required minimum width of 8 ft (2440 mm) shall have a clear width of not lessthan 6 ft 11 in. (2110 mm) for pairs of doors or a clear width of not less than 41 1⁄2 in. (1055 mm) for a single door.


123 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

(26) Where the corridor width is at least 8 ft (2440 mm), projections into the required width shall be permitted for emergency stairtravel devices, provided that all of the following conditions are met:

(27) These devices do not reduce the clear unobstructed corridor width to less than 72 in. (1830 mm).

(28) These devices are secured to the wall.

(29) Where furniture is placed in the corridor in accordance with 19.2.3.2(5) , the emergency stair travel devices are placed onthe same side of the corridor as the furniture.

(30) These devices are located so as to not obstruct access to building service and fire protection equipment.

(31) These devices are grouped such that each grouping does not exceed a projected floor area of 12 ft 2 (3.7 m 2 ).

(32) The groupings addressed in 19.2.3.2(9)(

5

(a) e ) are separated from each other by a distance of at least 10 ft (3050 mm).



5000_CCN_25.pdf 5000 CC Note #25


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 25 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Health Care Occupancies (HEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Rickard so as to correct the reference embedded within 19.2.3.2(9)(f) to refer to 19.2.3.2(9)(e).


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 25-NFPA 5000-2016 [Sections 19.2.3.2, 19.2.3.3]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The revision responds to Correlating Committee Note CCN-25; adds self-retracting seat criteria for consistency with NFPA101; corrects cross-reference in (5)(g).


124 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 25-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 19.2.3.2, 19.2.3.3 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Health Care Occupancies (HEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballotof Rickard so as to correct the reference embedded within 19.2.3.2(9)(f) to refer to 19.2.3.2(9)(e).


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:13 PM

of 281



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:13 PM

of 281


19.3.6.2.1*

Corridor walls shall be permitted to terminate at the ceiling where the ceiling is constructed to limit the transfer of smoke.



5000_CCN_27.pdf 5000 CC Note #. 27


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 27 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features to consider similar annex text for 8.10.2.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: No action by BLD-HEA - addressed by BLD-FIR via SR-3510.


125 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



Committee Statement: The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fire Protection Features to consider similar annex text for 8.10.2.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



1 of 1 3/2/2016 2:15 PM

of 281


21.3.9 Integrated Fire Protection Systems.

Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with Section 55.13 1 . 4.



5000_CCN_28.pdf 5000 CC Note #28


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 28 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Detention and Correctional Occupancies (DET) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Gaw and correct the reference in Section 21.3.9 as follows:


Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with Section 55.1.4


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This is an editorial change.


126 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Detention and Correctional Occupancies (DET) to consider the Affirmative withComment ballot of Gaw and correct the reference in Section 21.3.9 as follows:


Integrated fire protection systems shall be tested in accordance with Section 55.1.4


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:16 PM

of 281


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:16 PM

of 281


22.1.1.2*

One- and two-family dwellings shall be limited to buildings containing not more than two dwelling units in which each dwelling unit isoccupied by members of a single family with not more than three outsiders, if any, accommodated in rented rooms or by no morethan two persons per sleeping room, whichever is greater .


This section should be changed to accommodate individuals in a group that are capable of self-preservation to be accommodated within the definition of single family dwelling. While the current provision allows for any number of related individuals or "insiders" to occupy a single family dwelling, it currently limits the number of "outsiders" to three, regardless of the size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, or the configuration of the home. A more reasonable definition that proposes the limits of occupancy should establish limits based on size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, and the configuration of the home. This would help prevent the exclusion of the number of those that are "outsiders" that, under the provision, might be allowed for the same number of individuals if they were related. For instance, if in a given situation 6 insiders or related individuals were allowed to live in a given single family dwelling that have 4 bedrooms, it might seem unreasonable to prevent 6 "outsiders" or unrelated individuals from living in that same single family dwelling.

Attached are some reference materials that should help explain this situation. While the New York government document does go beyond explaining what the U.S. Supreme Court has decided by also including rulings that are only applicable to New York State, it does a good job of explaining what the U.S. Supreme Court has decided. The HUD document provides some informative discussion on some of the parameters, such as size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, and the configuration of the home, that could be involved in evaluating a situation should an attempt be made to have consistent policies for occupying single family dwellings across the spectrums (see beginning on page 5 where the topic says "24 C.F.R. Chapter ..."). This proposed modification only extends the definition with regard to what, perhaps, most would consider, the most salient parameter: number of bedrooms.

Related Item

Public Input No. 97-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 26.3.5.4]



Submitter Full Name: STANLEY HARBUCK

Organization: SCHOOL OF BUILDING INSPECTION

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The maximum number of outsiders have been already addressed in the definition of Board and Care Facilities (4+ unrelated).There is no technical justification for changing the limit of 3 outsiders to anything greater - and doing so would impact the B&Cand L&R chapters. Adult foster homes housing 4 or more occupants should be considered B&C.


127 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


22.1.1.2*

One- and two-family dwellings shall be limited to buildings containing not more than two dwelling units in which each dwelling unit isoccupied by members of a single family with not more than three outsiders, if any, accommodated in rented rooms or by no morethan two persons per sleeping room, whichever is greater .



5000_PC115_-_REFERENCE_MATERIALS.pdf 5000 Reference Materials to PC115


This section should be changed to accommodate individuals in a group that are capable of self-preservation to be accommodated within the definition of single family dwelling. While the current provision allows for any number of related individuals or "insiders" to occupy a single family dwelling, it currently limits the number of "outsiders" to three, regardless of the size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, or the configuration of the home. A more reasonable definition that proposes the limits of occupancy should establish limits based on size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, and the configuration of the home. This would help prevent the exclusion of the number of those that are "outsiders" that, under the provision, might be allowed for the same number of individuals if they were related. For instance, if in a given situation 6 insiders or related individuals were allowed to live in a given single family dwelling that have 4 bedrooms, it might seem unreasonable to prevent 6 "outsiders" or unrelated individuals from living in that same single family dwelling.

Attached are some reference materials that should help explain this situation. While the New York government document does go beyond explaining what the U.S. Supreme Court has decided by also including rulings that are only applicable to New York State, it does a good job of explaining what the U.S. Supreme Court has decided. The HUD document provides some informative discussion on some of the parameters, such as size, number of bedrooms or possible sleeping rooms, and the configuration of the home, that could be involved in evaluating a situation should an attempt be made to have consistent policies for occupying single family dwellings across the spectrums (see beginning on page 5 where the topic says "24 C.F.R. Chapter ..."). This proposed modification only extends the definition with regard to what, perhaps, most would consider, the most salient parameter: number of bedrooms.

Related Item


Public Input No. 169-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after A.26.3.5.3.2]


Submitter Full Name: Stanley Harbuck

Organization: School of Building Inspection

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Sat May 14 12:46:54 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected



128 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


22.1.1.2 *

One- and two-family dwellings shall be limited to buildings containing not more than two dwelling units in which each dwelling unit isoccupied by members of a single family with not more than three outsiders, if any, accommodated in rented rooms .


The code already addresses the transient versus non-transient nature of the inhabitants. The code should not try to define family. And the use of the term “outsider” is vague. This definition would prohibit four nonrelated persons from inhabiting a four bedroom house, which happens all the time. Also, the definition should not address whether the home is being occupied by an owner or a renter(s).

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected



129 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


22.1.8.2

The requirement of 22.1.8.1 shall not apply to any of the following:

Townhouses

Multiple-occupancy buildings

Additions a dditions or alterations to existing one- and two-family dwellings .


Items 1 and 2 should not be referenced because the scope of this chapter includes only 1 and 2 family dwellings. All non-1 and 2 family dwelling occupancies already do not apply.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: Townhouses in accordance with this chapter are considered one and two family dwellings.


130 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


22.2.4.8

Floor levels at doors in the primary means of escape shall comply with 11.2.1.3, unless otherwise permitted by one of the following:

(1) Where the door discharges to the outside or to an exterior exit access, an exterior landing with not more than a 7 in. (180 mm)drop below the door threshold and a minimum dimension of 36 in. (915 mm), or the width of the door leaf, whichever issmaller greater , shall be permitted.

(2) A door at the top of an interior stair shall be permitted to open directly at a stair, provided that the door does not swing over thestair and the door serves an area with an occupant load of fewer than 50 persons.


A door larger than 36 inches could have a 36 inch landing as this is currently written in the code. This would change the provision to require the landing to be at least the width of the door. If the landing, as currently written, is less than the door, persons could egress from the building onto uneven ground because the landing is smaller. It could also require a person to stand off the landing to open the door to enter the building. This is a tripping hazard.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: A door larger than 36 inches could have a 36 inch landing as this is currently written in the code. This would change theprovision to require the landing to be at least the width of the door. If the landing, as currently written, is less than the door,persons could egress from the building onto uneven ground because the landing is smaller. It could also require a person tostand off the landing to open the door to enter the building. This is a tripping hazard.


131 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


22.3.4.1.1 *

Smoke alarms shall be installed in accordance with 55.2.2.6 in all of the following locations:

(1) In all sleeping rooms

(2)

(3) On each level of the dwelling unit, including basements


Currently the code text is more open-ended and the annex text is specific. This Comment takes the specific requirement of 21 feet from the annex and NFPA 72, Chapter11 and puts it in this code section. The proposed annex text lets the reader know that the intent is to place the detector within the immediate space outside of the sleeping room.



Public Comment No. 91-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.22.3.4.1.1(2)]

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: Although the 21 ft requirement is consistent with what is in NFPA 72, the committee wants to remain consistent with otherchapters and maintain the "immediate vicinity" language. This is a possible revision for next cycle that the CC should review.

* Outside of each separate sleeping area, in the immediate vicinity of the sleeping rooms within 21 ft. of any door to a sleepingroom, with the distance measured along a path of travel.


132 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


23.2.1.1 Primary Means of Escape.

23.2.1.1.1

Every sleeping room and living area shall have access to a primary means of escape complying with 22.2.2.2 and located to providea safe path of travel to the outside.

23.2.1.1.2

Where sleeping rooms are above or below the level of exit discharge, the primary means of escape shall be an interior stair inaccordance with 23.2.2, an exterior stair, or a horizontal exit in accordance with 11.2.4.


This comment is addressing CI 7003. There is no explanation pertaining to why Chapter 11 should not apply to means of escape. All bathing facilities should not be required to have grab bars. Not every shower space is necessarily required to be handicapped accessible. If the bathtub or shower is required to be accessible then grab bars are already required and it doesn’t need to be re-stated again here. If the intention is to require grab bars in every bathtub and shower (even those which are not required to be accessible) then there is not sufficient information to support the change. as previously stated in other comments.





Related Item

Committee Input No. 7003-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 23.2.1]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The requirements for grab bars in homes were further refined from what was accepted in Chapter 7. Requirements for verticalgrab bars were revised. PC #173 outlines the background on the importance of bathroom grab bars for the prevention of falls.During the first draft meetings, fall prevention was added to the scope of NFPA 101.


133 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


24.3.4.10.3

Where fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces are installed outside guest rooms or guest suites, carbon monoxide alarmsor carbon monoxide detectors monoxide detectors shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s published instructions inall of the following locations:

(1) On the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces

(2) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air register from a permanently installed,fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) In a centrally located position within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attached garage

24.3.4.6.4 Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 24.3.4.10.3(1), the alarm signal shall be automaticallytransmitted to an approved onsite location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720.


NEMA respectfully requests the Committee reconsider their action on Public Input 87 and accept this Public Comment that seeks to require carbon monoxide (CO) detectors only in locations that are remote from occupied areas being protected. Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel–burning appliance installed in a normally unoccupied location2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only in ordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intended equipment for normally unoccupied locations.

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Vince Baclawski

Organization: Nema

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Thu May 12 14:04:51 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:

1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel–burning appliance installed in anormally unoccupied location

2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only inordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.

Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intendedequipment for normally unoccupied locations.


134 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


24.3.5.4

Where an automatic sprinkler system is installed, either for total or partial building coverage, the system shall be in accordance withSection 55.3, as modified by 24.3.5.5. In buildings four or fewer hotel and dormitory occupancies up to and including four stories inheight and , that are located in buildings not exceeding 60 ft (18.3 m) in height above grade plane, systems in accordance withNFPA 13R shall be permitted.

24.3.5.3.1 W here located in a building of Type III, Type IV or Type V construction designed in accordance with Sections 7.4.3.6.5or 7.4.3.6.7.1, attics shall comply with one of the following if the roof assembly is located more than 55 feet (16 764 mm) above thelowest level of required fire department vehicle access:

(1) P r o v i d e sprinkler protection.

(2) Construct the attic using noncombustible materials.

(3) Construct the attic using fire retardant-treated wood.

(4) Fill the attic with noncombustible insulation.

The height of the roof assembly shall be determined by measuring the distance from the lowest required fire department access roadsurface adjacent to the building to the eave of the highest pitched roof, the intersection of the highest roof to the exterior wall, or thetop of the highest parapet, whichever yields the greatest distance. For the purpose of this measurement, required fire departmentaccess roads shall include only those roads that are necessary for compliance with NFPA 1, Section 18.2.3.2 .


Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16, 2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving a tall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4 stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestal buildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevation portion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply because access is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it is required as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustible insulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify the attic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers to know of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that these NFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R (because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group B Code Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFC Code Development Committee on April 18, 2016.

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Marshall Klein

Organization: Marshall A. Klein & Associates, Inc.

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Apr 11 16:54:49 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:




135 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Statement: Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16,2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving atall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestalbuildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevationportion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply becauseaccess is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it isrequired as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustibleinsulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify theattic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers toknow of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that theseNFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R(because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group BCode Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFCCode Development Committee on April 18, 2016.


136 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


25.3.4.6.3

Where fuel-burning appliances or fuel burning fireplaces are installed outside dwelling dwellings units, carbon monoxide alarms orcarbon monoxide detectors carbon monoxide detectors shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer’s publishedinstructions in all of the following locations:

(1) On the ceilings of rooms containing permanently installed fuel-burning appliances or fuel-burning fireplaces

(2) In a centrally located position within located within occupiable spaces served by the first supply air register from a permanentlyinstalled, fuel-burning HVAC system

(3) In a centrally located position within located within occupiable spaces adjacent to a communicating attached garage

25.3.4.6.4 Where carbon monoxide detectors are installed in accordance with 24.3.4.10.3(1), the alarm signal shall be automaticallytransmitted to an approved onsite location or to an off-premises location in accordance with NFPA 720.


NEMA respectfully requests the Committee reconsider their action on Public Input 90 and accept this Public Comment that seeks to require carbon monoxide (CO) detectors only in locations that are remote from occupied areas being protected. Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel-burning appliance installed in a normally unoccupied location.2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only in ordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.

Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intended equipment for normally unoccupied locations.

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: Vince Baclawski

Organization: Nema

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: Requiring only CO detectors to be installed in these locations will:

1. Enhance public life safety by notifying a responsible party of a malfunctioning fuel-burning appliance installed in anormally unoccupied location.

2. Clarify the locations where CO alarms can be installed in accordance with their ANSI/UL2034 listings, which is only inordinary indoor locations of dwelling units not in commercial occupancies.

Accepting this change will adequately address on-site notification of a carbon monoxide incident by utilizing the intendedequipment for normally unoccupied locations.


137 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


25.3.5.3

Where an automatic sprinkler system is installed, either for total or partial building coverage, the system shall be installed inaccordance with Section 55.3, as modified by 25.3.5.4 through 25.3.5.7. In buildings four or fewer apartment occupancies up to andincluding four stories in height and , that are located in buildings not exceeding 60 ft (18.3 m) in height above grade plane, systemsin accordance with NFPA 13R shall be permitted.

25.3.5.3.1 W here located in a building of Type III, Type IV or Type V construction designed in accordance with Sections 7.4.3.6.5or 7.4.3.6.7.1, attics shall comply with one of the following if the roof assembly is located more than 55 feet (16 764 mm) above thelowest level of required fire department vehicle access:

(1) P r o v i d e sprinkler protection.

(2) Construct the attic using noncombustible materials.

(3) Construct the attic using fire retardant-treated wood.

(4) Fill the attic with noncombustible insulation.

The height of the roof assembly shall be determined by measuring the distance from the lowest required fire department access roadsurface adjacent to the building to the eave of the highest pitched roof, the intersection of the highest roof to the exterior wall, or thetop of the highest parapet, whichever yields the greatest distance. For the purpose of this measurement, required fire departmentaccess roads shall include only those roads that are necessary for compliance with NFPA 1, Section 18.2.3.2.


Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16, 2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving a tall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4 stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestal buildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevation portion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply because access is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it is required as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustible insulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify the attic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers to know of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that these NFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R (because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group B Code Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFC Code Development Committee on April 18, 2016.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Mon Apr 11 17:03:58 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:




138 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Statement: Based on the discussions and conclusions at the NFPA Workshop on NFPA 13R that took place in Orlando on December 15-16,2016, this code proposal came out of that Workshop as a response to fire service concerns about suppressing a f ire involving atall pedestal building attic.

Under this code proposal, such attic or attics will be required to have increased f ire protection. Pedestal buildings that exceed 4stories above grade plane, including the pedestal, are anticipated to be affected by this proposal, as would be some pedestalbuildings with fewer stories that are located on sloped lots with fire department access roads required along a lower elevationportion of the perimeter. The intent of stating "required" fire department access road is to make it clear that, simply becauseaccess is available on an adjacent road or parking lot, that road need not be considered in the height measurement unless it isrequired as part of satisfying the code requirement for fire department vehicle access to the building.

Note that allowances to use noncombustible construction materials, f ire-retardant treated wood, and filling with noncombustibleinsulation are already permitted by NFPA 13 as an alternative to installing sprinklers in concealed spaces in otherwise fully-sprinklered buildings. These allowances are duplicated in the proposed text so that an architect or developer can identify theattic protection concern and permissible solutions early in the design process, as opposed to expecting building designers toknow of these allowances buried deep in the text of NFPA 13. Having the exceptions in the this text w ill make it clear that theseNFPA 13 exceptions are appropriate for NFPA 13R attic protection as well, even though they are not included in NFPA 13R(because NFPA 13R doesn't ordinarily require attics to be protected).

This code proposal is intended to be identical to the IFC Code Proposal F172-16 that was submitted for the 2018 ICC Group BCode Development Cycle. Those IFC hearings were in Louisville KY from April 17-20, 2016. F172-16 was approved by the IFCCode Development Committee on April 18, 2016.


139 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


26.3.3.6.2

Sleeping rooms shall be separated from all spaces, other than adjacent sleeping rooms, adjacent bathrooms, or lounge areas, bywalls complying with 26.3.3.6.3 through 26.3.3.6.6.



5000_CCN_29.pdf 5000 CC Note #29


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 29 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Board and Care Facilities (BCF) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Bonisch and Nichols relative to the need to clarify the location or separation condition for the lounge. If the lounge is open to the corridor, the wall that separates the lounge from the sleeping room cannot be exempted from protection as it serves as a continuation of the corridor wall envelope.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The change incorporates the comments raised during the FR ballot, as raised by the CC Note 37. The annex note clarifiesthe intent of this requirement.


140 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Board and Care Facilities (BCF) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot ofBonisch and Nichols relative to the need to clarify the location or separation condition for the lounge. If the lounge is open to thecorridor, the wall that separates the lounge from the sleeping room cannot be exempted from protection as it serves as acontinuation of the corridor wall envelope.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:17 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:17 PM

of 281


26.3.3.8.2*

Where residential cooking equipment is used for food warming or limited cooking, the equipment shall not be required to beprotected in accordance with Section 55.10, and the presence of the equipment shall not require the area to be protected as ahazardous area where the heating elements or burners have been tested and listed to not allow cooking pan temperatures to exceed662°F (350°C).



5000_CCN_30.pdf 5000 CC Note #30


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 30 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Board and Care Facilities (BCF) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Bonisch relative lack of test standard for cooktop temperature. Follow the UL 858 STP work and reference the appropriate test standard for cooktop temperature measurement.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Revised the location of the burner/heating element temperature to prevent the overheating of cooking oil.


141 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Board and Care Facilities (BCF) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot ofBonisch relative lack of test standard for cooktop temperature. Follow the UL 858 STP work and reference the appropriate teststandard for cooktop temperature measurement.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:18 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:18 PM

of 281


27.4.4 * Mall Structures.

27.4.4.1 Scope.

Subsection 27.4.4 shall establish the minimum requirements for mall structures having not more than three stories and any number ofanchor buildings.

27.4.4.2 Special Definitions.

A list of special terms used in this chapter follows.

27.4.4.2.1 * Anchor Building.

A building housing any occupancies having low or ordinary hazard contents and having direct access to a mall structure, but havingall required means of egress independent of the mall concourse.

27.4.4.2.2 * Mall Structure.

A single building enclosing a number of tenants and occupancies wherein two or more tenants have a main entrance into one or moremalls. For the purpose of this chapter, anchor buildings shall not be considered as a part of the mall structure. (See 3.3.68.12.)a: Enclosed Mall Concourse. A mall concourse which has less than 50 % of the total area of the perimeter walls and area of the

roof open to the outer air. Such openings shall be distributed uniformly over the length of the mall concourse

b: Open mall Concourse. * A mall concourse which has 50 % or more of the total area of the perimeter walls and area of the roofopen to the outer air. Such openings shall be distributed uniformly over the length of the mall concourse

27.4.4.2.3 Food Court.

A public seating area located in a mall concourse that serves adjacent food preparation tenant spaces.

27.4.4.2.4 Gross Leasable Area.

The total floor area designated for tenant occupancy and exclusive use. The area of tenant occupancy is measured from thecenterlines of joint partitions to the outside of the tenant walls. All tenant areas, including areas used for storage, are part of the grossleasable area.

27.4.4.2.5 Mall Concourse.

A roofed or covered common pedestrian area within a mall structure that serves as access for two or more tenants and does notexceed three levels that are open to each other. (See 3.3.384.)

27.4.4.2.6 Major Tenant.

A tenant space, in a mall structure, with one or more main entrances from the exterior that also serve as exits and are independent ofthe mall concourse. (See 3.3.384.)

27.4.4.3 Minimum Construction Requirements.

Construction shall be in accordance with all of the following:

(1) Chapter 7, Construction Types and Height and Area Requirements

(2) Chapter 8, Fire-Resistive Materials and Construction

(3) Chapter 13, Encroachments into the Public Right-of-Way

(4) Chapter 14, Safeguards During Construction

(5) Chapter 31, Occupancies in Special Structures

(6) Chapter 35, Structural Design

(7) Chapter 36, Soils, Foundations, and Retaining Walls

(8) Chapter 37, Exterior Wall Construction

(9) Chapter 38, Roof Assemblies and Roof Structures

(10) Chapter 39, Flood-Resistant Design and Construction

(11) Chapter 40, Quality Assurance During Construction

27.4.4.3.1 Types of Construction.

The area of mall structures and attached anchor buildings shall not be limited where the mall structures, anchor buildings, andattached parking structures are surrounded on all sides by a permanent open space of not less than 60 ft (18.3 m) under any one ofthe following conditions:

(1) Mall structures and anchor buildings of Type I, Type II, or Type IV construction shall not exceed three stories in height.

(2) Mall structures and anchor buildings of Type III construction shall not exceed two stories in height.

27.4.4.3.2 Anchor Building Separations.


142 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

27.4.4.3.2.1

Each anchor building three stories or less in height of Type I, Type II, or Type IV construction, or two stories or less in height of TypeIII construction, shall be separated from the mall structure and other anchor buildings by a fire barrier having a fire resistance ratingdetermined in accordance with Table 6.2.4.1.1(a) for the uses being separated, but with a rating of not less than 2 hours.

27.4.4.3.2.2

Anchor buildings of more than three stories in height of Type I, Type II, or Type IV construction, or of more than two stories in height ofType III construction, or any anchor building of Type V construction, shall be separated from the mall structure and other anchorbuildings by fire walls.

27.4.4.3.3 Anchor Building Openings.

Openings in the fire barrier provided in accordance with 27.4.4.3.2.1 between an anchor building and the pedestrian area of the mallconcourse shall not be required to be protected for those anchor buildings housing assembly occupancies, business occupancies,and mercantile occupancies other than bulk merchandising retail buildings.

27.4.4.3.4 Parking Structures.

Parking structures within 60 ft (18.3 m) of the mall structure or anchor building shall meet all of the following criteria:

(1) They shall be of Type I or Type II construction.

(2) They shall be limited in height in accordance with Section 30.8.

(3) They shall be separated in accordance with 27.1.2.

27.4.4.3.5 Tenant Separations.

27.4.4.3.5.1

Each tenant space shall be separated from other tenant spaces by partitions having a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour.

27.4.4.3.5.2 *

The partition shall extend to the underside of the ceiling.

27.4.4.3.5.3

No separation shall be required between the tenant space and the mall concourse.

27.4.4.4 Mixed Occupancies.

Assembly occupancies, other than stadiums and arenas, and business and mercantile occupancies located in mall structures shallnot be required to comply with the provisions of 6.2.4.

27.4.4.5 Means of Egress.

27.4.4.5.1

All means of egress shall be in accordance with Chapter 11 and this chapter.

27.4.4.5.2

The mall concourse shall be permitted to be considered a pedestrian way, provided that the criteria of 27.4.4.5.2.1 through27.4.4.5.2.2 are met.27.4.4.5.2 Travel Distance

The mall concourse shall be permitted to be considered a pedestrian way, provided that the criteria of 27 . 4.4.5.2. 1 through27.4.4.5.2.2 are met.

27.4.4.5.2.1

The travel distance within a tenant space to an exit or to the mall concourse shall not exceed the maximum travel distance permittedby the occupancy chapter.


143 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

27.4.4.5.2.2

An additional 200 ft (61 m) shall be permitted for travel through the mall concourse space, provided that all of the followingrequirements are met:

(1)(a) The partition shall extend to the underside of the ceiling or to the floor or roof or roof deck above.

* 27.4.4.5.2.2

An additional 200 ft (61 m) shall be permitted for travel through the enclosed mall concourse or 300 ft (91 m) for travelthrough the open mall concourse , , provided that all of the following requirements are met:

The mall concourse shall be of a clear width not less than that needed to accommodate egress requirements as set forth inother sections of this chapter, but shall be not less than 20 ft (6100 mm) wide in its narrowest dimension.

(2) On each side of the mall concourse floor area, the mall concourse shall be provided with an unobstructed exit access of not lessthan 10 ft (3050 mm) in clear width parallel to, and adjacent to, the mall concourse tenant front.

(3)

(4) The mall concourse, and all buildings connected thereto, except open parking structures, shall be protected throughout by anapproved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 55.3.1.1 (1).

(5) The sprinkler system specified in 27.4.4.5.2.2 (4) shall be installed in such a manner that any portion of the system servingtenant spaces can be taken out of service without affecting the operation of the portion of the system serving the mall concourse.

(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)

27.4.4.5.3

Dead ends not exceeding a length equal to twice the width of the mall concourse, measured at the narrowest location within thedead-end portion of the mall concourse, shall be permitted.27.4.4.5. 3

Dead ends not exceeding a length equal to twice the width of the mall concourse for enclosed mall concourses or two and a halftimes the width of the mall concourse for open mall concourses , measured at the narrowest location within the dead-end portion ofthe mall, shall be permitted.

27. 4 .4.5.4

Each assembly occupancy with an occupant load of 500 or more shall have not less than one-half of its required means of egressindependent of the mall concourse.

27.4.4.5.5

Every story of a mall structure shall be provided with the number of means of egress specified by Section 11.4 and as modified by27.4.4.5.5.1 or 27.4.4.5.5.2.

27.4.4.5.5.1

Exit access travel shall be permitted to be common for the distances permitted as common paths of travel by 27.2.5.3.

27.4.4.5.5.2

A single means of egress shall be permitted in a Class C mercantile occupancy or a business occupancy, provided that the traveldistance to the exit or to a mall concourse does not exceed 100 ft (30 m).

27.4.4.5.5.3

Every floor of a mall concourse shall be provided with the number of means of egress specified by Section 11.4, with not less thantwo means of egress remotely located from each other.

27.4.4.5.5.4

Class A and Class B mercantile occupancies connected to a mall concourse shall be provided with the number of means of egressrequired by Section 11.4, with not less than two means of egress remotely located from one another.

27.4.4.5.6

Each individual major tenant of a mall structure shall have a minimum of one-half of its required means of egress independent of themall concourse.

27.4.4.5.7 *

Each individual anchor building shall have means of egress independent of the mall concourse.

27.4.4.5.8

Each individual tenant space shall have means of egress to the outside or to the mall concourse based on occupant load calculated inaccordance with Table 11.3.1.2.

27.4.4.5.9

* The exit access from a mall concourse, as specified in 27.4.4.5.2.2(2), shall lead to an exit having a width of not less than 66in. (1675 mm).

* Walls dividing tenant spaces from each other shall have a fire resistance rating of not less than 1 hour, and all of the followingalso shall apply:

The partition shall extend to the underside of the ceiling or to the roof or floor above.

No separation shall be required between a tenant space and the mall concourse.

* Malls with a floor opening connecting more than two levels shall be provided with a smoke control system.


144 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Exit passageways shall comply with 27.4.4.5.9.1 and 27.4.4.5.9.2.

27.4.4.5.9.1

Exit passageways in a mall structure shall be permitted to accommodate the following independently:

(1) Portion of the occupant load assigned to the exit passageway from only the mall concourse

(2) Largest occupant load assigned to the exit passageway from a single tenant space

27.4.4.5.9.2 *

Rooms housing building service equipment, janitor closets, and service elevators shall be permitted to open directly onto exitpassageways, provided that all of the following criteria are met:

(1) The required fire resistance rating between such rooms or areas and the exit passageway shall be maintained in accordancewith 11.1.3.2.

(2) Such rooms or areas shall be protected by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with NFPA 13 and55.3.2; however, the exceptions in NFPA 13 that permit the omission of sprinklers from such rooms shall not be permitted.

(3) Service elevators opening into the exit passageway shall not open into areas other than exit passageways.

(4) Where exit stair enclosures discharge into the exit passageway, the provisions of 11.2.1.5.9 shall apply, regardless of thenumber of stories served.

27.4.4.6 Mall Concourse Exit Capacity.

The capacity of the required exits from the mall concourse shall accommodate the occupant load calculated as the sum of theoccupant loads required in 27.4.4.6.1 and 27.4.4.6.2.

27.4.4.6.1

The gross leasable area of the mall structure (not including anchor buildings) shall be divided by the appropriate lowest whole numberoccupant load factor (OLF) from Figure 11.3.1.2. The occupant load factor shall not be less than 30 and shall not exceed 55.

27.4.4.6.2

For any food court or other assembly occupancy areas located in the mall concourse that are not included as a portion of the grossleasable area of the mall structure, an occupant load shall be calculated based on the occupant load factor for the appropriate use, asspecified in Table 11.3.1.2. The remaining mall concourse area shall not be assigned an occupant load.

27.4.4.7 Fire Protection Systems.

27.4.4.7.1 Automatic Extinguishing Systems.

27.4.4.7.1.1

The mall structure and all anchor buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system inaccordance with NFPA 13, 55.3.2, and 27.4.4.7.1.27.4.4.7.1. 1

The mall building and all anchor buildings shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system inaccordance with NFPA 13, 55.3. 2 , and 27.4.4.7.1 through 27.4.4.7.1.4. .

27.4.4.7.1.2

The system shall be installed in such a manner that any portion of the system serving tenant spaces can be taken out of servicewithout affecting the operation of the portion of the system serving the mall concourse.

27.4.4.7. 1.3 * Any shade structures, canopies, awnings, or similar structures in the open mall concourse shall beprotected by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system where required by NFPA 13 and 55.3. 2 .

27.4.4.7.1.4* Kiosks shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised, automatic sprinkler system in accordance withSection 9.7

27.4.4.7.2 Hose Connections.

Where the mall concourse is not protected by a standpipe system in accordance with NFPA 14, hose connections shall be installed inaccordance with 27.4.4.7.2.1 through 27.4.4.7.2.3.

27.4.4.7.2.1

There shall be a hose outlet connected to a system sized to deliver 250 gal/min (946 L/min) at the most hydraulically remote outlet.

27.4.4.7.2.2

The outlet shall be supplied from the mall concourse zone sprinkler system and shall be hydraulically calculated.

27.4.4.7.2.3

Hose outlets shall be provided at each of the following locations:

(1) Within the mall concourse at the entrance to each exit passage or corridor

(2) At each floor level landing within enclosed stairways opening directly onto the mall concourse

(3) At exterior public entrances to the mall concourse


145 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

27.4.4.8 * Smoke Control.

A smoke control system in accordance with Section 55.7 and complying with 8.12.3 (5) shall be provided in a mall concourse withfloor openings connecting more than two levels.27.4.4. 8* Smoke Control.

A smoke control system in accordance with Section 55.7 and complying with 8.12.3 (5) shall be provided in a an enclosed mallconcourse with floor openings connecting more than two levels.

27.4.4. 9 Fire Department Access to Equipment.

Rooms or areas containing controls for air-conditioning systems; automatic fire-extinguishing systems; or other detection,suppression, or control elements shall be identified for use by the fire department.

27.4.4.10 *

Emergency lighting shall be provided in accordance with 27.2.9.

27.4.4.10.1 General.

Malls shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 55.2, as modified by 27.4.4.10.

27.4.4.10.2 Initiation.

Initiation of the required fire alarm system shall be by means of the required automatic sprinkler system in accordance with 55.2.2 (3)and by manual means in accordance with 55.2.2.1.6 and 55.2.2.1.7.

27.4.4.10.3 Notification.

27.4.4.10.3.1 Occupant Notification.

During all times that the mall concourse is occupied, the required fire alarm system, once initiated, shall perform one of the followingfunctions:

(1) It shall activate a general alarm in accordance with 55.2.3 throughout the mall concourse, except a positive alarm sequence inaccordance with 55.2.3.4 shall be permitted.

(2) Occupant notification shall be permitted to be made via a voice communication or public address system in accordance with55.2.3.9.2.

27.4.4.10.3.2 *

Visible signals shall not be required in malls. (See 55.2.3.5.6.)

27.4.4.10.3.3 Emergency Forces Notification.

Emergency forces notification shall be provided and shall include notifying all of the following:

(1) Fire department in accordance with 55.2.4

(2) Approved local emergency organization, if provided

27.4.4.10.3.4 Emergency Control.

The fire alarm system shall be arranged to automatically actuate smoke management or smoke-control systems in accordance with55.2.5.2 (3).

27.4.4.11 Tenant Spaces.

Each individual tenant space shall have means of egress to the outside or to the mall concourse, based on occupant load calculatedby using Table 11.3.1.2.

27.4.4.12 Kiosks.

27.4.4.12.1

Kiosks and similar structures (temporary or permanent) shall not be considered as tenant spaces and shall be constructed ofnoncombustible or limited-combustible materials, or of combustible materials meeting any of the following criteria:

(1) Listed fire-retardant-treated wood complying with the requirements of 45.5.15

(2) Light-transmitting plastics complying with Chapter 48

(3) Foamed plastics having a maximum heat release rate not greater than 100 kW when tested in accordance with UL 1975 or inaccordance with NFPA 289, using the 20 kW ignition source

(4) Metal composite material (MCM) having a flame spread index not greater than 25 and a smoke developed index not greater than450 in accordance with ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, or UL 723,Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, when tested as an assembly in the maximumthickness intended for use

(5) Textiles and films meeting the flame propagation performance criteria contained in Test Method 1 or Test Method 2, asappropriate, of NFPA 701

27.4.4.12.2

Kiosks or similar structures located within the mall concourse shall be protected with approved fire suppression and detection devices.27.4.4.12. 2

Kiosks or similar structures located within the enclosed mall concourse shall be protected with approved fire suppression anddetection devices.


146 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

27.4.4.12. 3

The minimum horizontal separation between kiosks, or groups of kiosks, and other structures within the mall concourse shall be 20 ft(6100 mm).

27.4.4.12.4

Each kiosk, or group of kiosks, or similar structure shall have a maximum area of 300 ft2 (27.8 m2).A.27.4.4.2.2(b) An open mall concourse is permitted to serve as the public way provided that the open mall concourse meets the

definition of public way in accordance with this Code.

It is intended that the open mall concourse be designed, constructed, and arranged to permit the natural venting of smoke and otherproducts of combustion to the outside air through openings in the walls, roof, or combination thereof of the mall concourse. The areaof openings should be at least 50% of the total areas of the roof and perimeter walls enclosing the entire mall concourse.

Where such a perimeter wall is not continuous to a covered area, the area of the open space should be included in the overall mallconcourse perimeter wall area, however this open space can also be considered to satisfy part of the space required to be open tothe outside air. There may be situations, such as at the ends of the mall concourse, where these perimeter walls are completelyopen to the outside air. At those locations, the open wall would be included in the area of the overall perimeter wall, and would alsoserve as a portion of the area required to be open in order for the space to be considered as an open mall concourse. It should alsobe noted that required exterior openings should be distributed so as to permit air circulation and venting from all portions of the mallconcourse.

Open spaces in the mall concourse wall(s) or roof(s) can be considered open when a portion(s) of the wall(s) or roof(s) are open tothe outside air (e.g. outside atmosphere). Open areas can include entrances to the mall concourse (e.g. such as barred gates whichallow air to pass through versus an entrance storefront), clearstory spaces between the mall building (structure which housestenants) and the roof above, and openings in the roof assembly. In order for the openings to be effective they must also be distributeduniformly over the length of the mall concourse. To demonstrate compliance for the minimum fifty percent (50%) openness the totalwall and roof area surrounding the mall concourse, including open areas (imaginary wall and roof areas), is measured (square feet orsquare meters), then the open areas are measured (square feet or square meters), and evaluated by dividing the measured openarea by the total measured wall and roof area. Concurrently, an analysis of the distribution of open areas needs to take place.Caution must be exercised in the design and construction so as to not create areas of possible congestion for smoke and hot gassesto accumulate, such as a pitched (steep slope) roof assembly within the mall concourse.

Roof assemblies are permitted to have holes or open areas which represent openings to the outside. The roof assembly is alsopermitted to consist of a structure or assembly which allows the venting of the mall concourse. Examples of these vented roofstructures include a roof trellis or an exposed roof structural frame only with no roofing materials. These types of structures thatwould permit the omission of automatic sprinkler protection, in accordance with NFPA 13, could be included to serve as open spacefor the purposes of the calculation of areas open to the outside air. Caution should be taken not to allow vegetation to grow into andaround these structures which could reduce or impede the venting capabilities.

A.27.4.4.2.2 A mall structure can include either an enclosed mall concourse or an open mall concourse. A mall structure may beenclosed by construction which could range from total enclosure to construction which is open, either partially or totally, to the outerair. For structures without complete walls and/or roof, the termination of the mall exit discharge would determine the extent of thestructure.

A.27.4.4.5.2.2(1) See Section 27.2.5.7

A.27.4.4.10 See 11.8.1.1.

A.27.4.4.13.3 Examples of these roof type structures include but are not limited to shade structures, canopies, awnings or othersimilar structures located above the open mall concourse which serve as a screen or shelter from the sun, rain, or other atmosphericand climatological effects. However, these structures are designed to only partially enclose the area above a mall concourse, allowthe mall concourse to be open to the atmosphere, and not serve as roof that is designed to separate the conditioned space of themall concourse from the exterior atmosphere. These structures are permitted to be supported by the mall building, mall concoursewalls, or can be self-supporting. It is intended that these structures be protected by a supervised automatic sprinkler system whererequired by NFPA 13 unless allowed to be omitted with approval of the AHJ.

A.27.4.4.13.4 Where no roof exists in an open mall concourse and sprinklers are not required, sprinkler protection can be omittedfrom the kiosk. Where sprinklers are provided at the mall concourse ceiling, the obstruction provisions of NFPA 13 also apply.


Statement: The proposed changes are the result of task group work that was initiated at the completion of the 2015 revision cycle. The focus of the task group was to update terminology related to shopping malls to better describe the applicability and intent of the Code sections as well as develop language to address both enclosed and open type mall concourses. The changes proposed here as public comments represent a continuation of the work proposed during the First Draft stage. The focus of these changes is to clarify the proposed definitions of open and enclosed mall concourses and to address the impact of these new definitions on the current mall provisions. Explanations for the individual changes throughout 27.4.4 are provided here:27.4.4.2 and Annex: The 50% value is a commonly used quantity for recognition for open air means of egress components (such stairs, balconies, exit access, etc.) that have been designed to limit the accumulation of smoke in the means of egress; The proposed definitions recognize other features which are already used in other occupancy classifications where specialized life safety provisions are present such as open air parking structures, industrial/storage. A.27.4.4.2.2 The proposed Annex language clarifies the definition of mall structure with regards to the newly proposed definitions of open and enclosed mall concourses. 27.4.4.5.2: The concept of pedestrian way was used in the code to prevent the mall concourse from being enforced as a corridor. The term pedestrian way is not defined in the Code and is not used in any other provisions in Section 36.4.4. Section 36.4.4.4 includes provisions for travel distance within the tenant space and the mall concourse area so the change in title reflects the requirements. The change more clearly coordinates with title and application of new terminology in this chapter and those used by current industry standards.


147 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

27.4.4.5.2.2: The code has other scenarios where additional travel is permitted in exterior environments, or scenarios where extra protection features offer additional safety to occupants. The travel distance extension here represents a similar principle with comparable hazards and conditions (example: where special provisions have been made for the control and removal of smoke and products of combustion such as smoke protected assembly seating (12.4.2.12/13), outdoor stadia, facilities with exterior exit access and egress components which are open to the outside air). The new definition of open mall concourse provides support for increase in travel distance. A. 27.4.4.5.2.2 (1): New annex reference sends users to a section in the general mercantile on wheeled carts or kiosks obstructing a means of egress to assist in enforcing the clear width. 27.4.4.5.2.2 (6): Consistent terminology from Chapter 8 and definition. Without ‘deck’ the demarcation is left up to the AHJ. Clarifies the termination point of the partition. Has to extend to the finished deck of the roof or floor. 27.4.4.5.3 The increase in dead end travel compares to other occupancies that allow from 20 to 50 ft. Many occupancies allow a 20 ft dead end in nonsprinklered buildings and an increase to 50 ft where the building is protected throughout by an automatic sprinkler system. This proposed increase in dead end travel for open mall concourses represents the specific hazards associated with open mall concourses based upon the new definition proposed for open mall concourses. The change coordinates with other occupancies where special arrangements have been provided to prevent for the accumulation of smoke in the means of egress.A.27.4.4.10: A pointer back to the core chapter section on emergency lighting reminds users about the application of emergency lighting. The means of egress including exit access and exit discharge will need to be defined based on whether the structure is being enforced as an open mall concourse or an enclosed mall concourse. 27.4.4.8: Provisions for the protection of kiosks have been moved to Section 27.4.4.7.1 for extinguishment. Keeps extinguishment provisions in same section. 27.4.4.8: This proposed change to mandate smoke control only for enclosed mall concourses connecting more than two levels represents the specific hazards associated with open versus enclosed mall concourses based upon the new definition proposed for open mall concourses. The change coordinates with other occupancies and other changes within the mall section where special arrangements have been provided to prevent for the accumulation of smoke in the means of egress.27.4.4.1.7.3 and Annex: Many open mall concourses contain shade structures and other features that may necessitate the need for automatic sprinkler protection. The proposed languages points user to the applicable section of Chapter 9 and then to NFPA 13 for the necessary guidance on how to protect these features. 27.4.4.1.7.4: This text was formerly located in the section specifically for kiosks and is being relocated here to keep requirements for extinguishment in one section. It makes the section more user friendly.

Related Item

First Revision No. 6508-NFPA 5000-2015 [Global Input]


Submitter Full Name: David Dodge

Organization: Safety and Forensic Consulting

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: he proposed changes are the result of task group work that was initiated at the completion of the 2015 revision cycle. The focusof the task group was to update terminology related to shopping malls to better describe the applicability and intent of the Codesections as well as develop language to address both enclosed and open mall concourses. The changes proposed here aspublic comments represent a continuation of the work proposed during the First Draft stage. The focus of these changes is toclarify the proposed definitions of open and enclosed mall concourses and to address the impact of these new definitions on thecurrent mall provisions. Open mall concourses are becoming a very common design of mall type structures where as much ofthe pedestrian area is open to the outside. The provisions developed here recognize this now popular design approach and alsorecognize that the hazards with open mall concourses are different than enclosed mall concourses. Much thought anddiscussion was contributed by the full committee during the Second Draft meeting. Annex language was carefully developed toassist users in understanding and applying the new open mall concourse concept. The changes proposed in the multiple SecondRevisions throughout Section 27.4.4 incorporate the concept of open mall concourse as set forth in the definitions shown in thisrevision.


148 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


28.1.7 Occupant Load.

28.1.7.1

The occupant load, in number of persons for whom means of egress and other provisions are required, shall be determined on thebasis of the occupant load factors of Table 11.3.1.2 that are characteristic of the use of the space, or shall be determined as themaximum probable population of the space under consideration, whichever is greater.

Delete new 28.1.7.2 from CI 6512 increasing the occupant load to 150 ft2/person.


This CI increases the occupant load by 50% which will now make buildings much larger before a fire alarm system is required. There is not enough technical justification to do that.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 6512-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 28.1.7]


Submitter Full Name: Thomas Hammerberg

Organization: Automatic Fire Alarm Association

Affilliation: Automatic Fire Alarm Association

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

Committee Action: Unknown Reason

Resolution: No revisions are being made based upon the Committee Input regarding occupant load.


149 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


31.6.13 Additional Requirements for Air Traffic Control Towers.

31.6.13.1 Definition — Air Traffic Control Tower.

See 3.3.654.1.

31.6.13.2 Use of Accessory Levels.

The levels located below the observation level shall be permitted to be occupied only for the following uses:

(1) Use that support tower operations such as electrical and mechanical equipment rooms, including emergency and standbypower, radar, communications, and electronics rooms

(2)

31.6.13.3 Minimum Construction Requirements.

Air traffic control towers shall be of Type I or Type II construction. (See 7.2.1.)

31.6.13.4 Means of Egress.

31.6.13.4.1* Number of Means of Egress.

Air traffic control towers shall be permitted to have a single exit, provided that all the following conditions are met in addition to therequirements of 31.6.5:

(1) Each level of air traffic control towers, served by a single exit, shall be subject to a calculated occupant load of 15 or fewerpersons.

(2) A fire alarm system shall be provided in accordance with 55.2. Smoke detection shall be provided throughout air traffic controltowers to meet the requirements of partial coverage, as defined in 5.5.2.2 of NFPA 72 , and shall include coverage of all of thefollowing:

(a) Observation level

(b) Means of egress

(c) All equipment rooms

(d) Incidental accessory uses

(e) Accessible utility shafts

(3) The requirements of 31.6.5.1 (5) shall not apply.

(4) Rooms or spaces used for the storage, processing, or use of combustible supplies shall be permitted in quantities deemedacceptable by the authority having jurisdiction.

(5) Smokeproof exit enclosures shall be provided in accordance with 11.2.3.

31.6.13.4.2 Remoteness.

Where an air traffic control tower is equipped throughout with an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordancewith Section 9.7, the minimum separation distance between two exits, or exit accesses, measured in accordance with 7.5.1.3.2 shallbe not less than one-fourth of the length of the maximum overall dimension of the building or area to be served.

31.6.13.4.3 Accessible Means of Egress.

Accessible means of egress shall not be required to serve the observation level and the floor immediately below the observationlevel in air traffic control towers.

31.6.13.4.4 Egress for Occupant Load.

Means of egress for air traffic control towers shall be provided for the occupant load, as determined in accordance with 11.3.1.

31.6.13.4.5 Areas Excluded from Occupant Load.

Shafts, stairs, and spaces and floors not subject to human occupancy shall be excluded from consideration in determining the totalcalculated occupant load of the tower, as required by 31.6.5.1 (1) and 31.6.13.4.1 (1).

31.6.13.4.6 Single Means of Egress.

A single means of egress shall be permitted from the observation level of an air traffic control tower to an exit, as permitted by31.6.5.2.

31.6.13.4.7 Smokeproof Enclosures.

Smokeproof exit enclosures complying with 11.2.3 shall be provided for all air traffic control tower exit enclosures.

31.6.13.4.8 Discharge from Exits.

31.6.13.4.8.1

Air traffic control towers shall comply with the requirements of 11.7.2, except as permitted by 31.6.13.4.6.2.

31.6.13.5 Protection.

* Incidental accessory uses that support tower operations


150 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

31.6.13.5.1 Detection, Alarm, and Communications Systems.

Air traffic control towers shall be provided with a fire alarm system in accordance with Section 55.2. Smoke detection shall beprovided throughout the air traffic control tower to meet the requirements for partial coverage, as defined in 5.5.2.2 of NFPA 72 , andshall include coverage of all of the following:

(1) All equipment rooms

(2) Observation level

(3) Outside each opening into exit enclosures

(4) Along the single means of egress permitted from observation levels in 31.6.5.2

(5) Outside each opening into the single means of egress permitted from observation levels in 31.6.5.2

31.6.13.5.2 Extinguishing Requirements.

Air traffic control towers shall be protected throughout by an approved, supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance withSection 55.3.

31.6.13.5.3 Standpipe Requirements.

New air traffic control towers where the floor of the observation level is greater than 30 ft (9.1 m) above the lowest level of firedepartment vehicle access shall be protected throughout with a Class I standpipe system in accordance with Section 55.4. Class Istandpipes shall be permitted to be manual standpipes, as defined in NFPA 14, where the authority having jurisdiction has beendetermined to have sufficient capabilities to supply the system.

31.6.13.6 Prohibited Uses.

Sleeping areas shall be prohibited in air traffic control towers.

31.6.13.7 Emergency Command Center.

31.6.13.7.1

An emergency command center shall be provided in a location approved by the fire department where the floor of an occupiablestory is greater than 75 ft (23 m) above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access. Emergency command center is permittedto be located in the air traffic control tower or an adjacent contiguous building where building functions are interdependent.


151 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

31.6.13.7.2

The emergency command center shall contain the following:

(1) Fire department two-way telephone communication service panels and controls

(2) Fire detection and fire alarm system control unit and annunciator

(3) Elevator floor location and operation annunciators

(4) Elevator fire recall switch in accordance with ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators

(5) Controls and annunciators for systems supporting smokeproof enclosures

(6) Sprinkler valve and waterflow annunciators

(7) Emergency generator status indicators

(8) Schematic building plans indicating typical floor plan and detailing the building core, means of egress, fire protection systems,fire-fighting equipment and fire department access as well as the location of fire walls, fire barriers, fire partitions, smokebarriers, and smoke partitions

(9) Fire pump status indicators

(10) Telephone for fire department use with controlled access to the public telephone system

(11) An approved Building Information Card that contains, but is not limited to, the following information:

(a) General building information that includes: property name, address, the number of floors in the building (above and belowgrade), use and occupancy classification (for mixed uses, identify the different types of occupancies on each floor),estimated building population (i.e., day, night, weekend)

(b) Building emergency contact information that includes a list of the building's emergency contacts (e.g., building manager,building engineer) and their respective work phone numbers, cell phone numbers, email addresses

(c) Building construction information that includes the type of building construction (e.g., floors, walls, columns, and roofassembly)

(d) Exit stair information that includes: number of exit stairs in building, each exit stair designation and floors served, locationwhere each exit stair discharges, exit stairs that are pressurized, exit stairs provided with emergency lighting, each exit stairthat allows re-entry, exit stairs providing roof access; elevator information that includes: number of elevator banks, elevatorbank designation, elevator car numbers and respective floors that they serve, location of elevator machine rooms, locationof sky lobby, location of freight elevator banks

(e) Building services and system information that includes location of mechanical rooms, location of building managementsystem, location and capacity of all fuel oil tanks, location of emergency generator, location of natural gas service

(f) Fire protection system information that includes locations of standpipes, location of fire pump room, location of firedepartment connections, floors protected by automatic sprinklers, location of different types of sprinkler systems installed(e.g., dry, wet, preaction)

(g) Hazardous material information that includes location of hazardous material and quantity of hazardous material

(12) Worktable

31.6.13.8 Emergency Action Plans and Fire Drills.

31.6.13.8.1

All air traffic control towers shall have written copies of an emergency action plan as required by Section 4.8.

31.6.13.8.2

Fire drills shall be conducted such that all employees participate at least once annually in accordance with Section 4.7.

31.6.13.8.3

Employees of air traffic control towers shall be instructed at least annually in the emergency action plan.

31.6.13.8.4

The emergency action plan shall be updated at least annually.



5000_CCN_31.pdf 5000 CC Note #31


NOTE: This public comment appeared as CC Note No. 31 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Industrial and Storage Occupancies (IND) to do the following:

1. Revise 31.6.13.4.1(2)(b) from “Means of egress” to the former term “Common areas” or something else that is definitive as “means of egress” includes ALL spaces where an occupant can be present.

2. Revise 31.6.13.4.2 to insert the word “diagonal” to read “…maximum overall diagonal dimension…”


152 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

3. Revise second sentence of 31.6.13.7.1 to change “is permitted’ to “shall be permitted” to read: “The emergency command center shall be permitted to be located…”

4. Change “air traffic control tower” to “airport traffic control tower” or “air traffic control towers” to “airport traffic control towers”

5. Consider deletion of Section 31.6.18.8 in its entirety as it relates to emergency action plans and fire drills which are outside the scope of NFPA 5000.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The changes shown in this revision are in response to the request of the Correlating Committee via Public Comment No. 32.The committee did not make the change as requested in item 1 and retains the phrase "means of egress." Using the phrase"means of egress" provides the necessary guidance to designers and reviews when evaluating the design of airport trafficcontrol towers. The requirement intended that detection be provided in all areas of means of egress to help ensure adequateprotection for these structures that often have only one way out. In addition, occupants of the ATCT may have their egressdelayed due to equipment shutdown and procedures and the detection provides the early response needed to account fordelayed response/egress.

A request will be brought forth to the NFPA 5000 Correlating Committee to update the term "air traffic control tower" to "airporttraffic control tower" throughout the document which correlates with changes made to NFPA 101 during the First Draft.


153 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 31-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 31.6.13 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Industrial and Storage Occupancies (IND) to do the following:

1. Revise 31.6.13.4.1(2)(b) from “Means of egress” to the former term “Common areas” or something else that is definitive as“means of egress” includes ALL spaces where an occupant can be present.

2. Revise 31.6.13.4.2 to insert the word “diagonal” to read “…maximum overall diagonal dimension…”

3. Revise second sentence of 31.6.13.7.1 to change “is permitted’ to “shall be permitted” to read: “The emergency commandcenter shall be permitted to be located…”

4. Change “air traffic control tower” to “airport traffic control tower” or “air traffic control towers” to “airport traffic control towers”

5. Consider deletion of Section 31.6.18.8 in its entirety as it relates to emergency action plans and fire drills which are outsidethe scope of NFPA 5000.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:19 PM

of 281

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:19 PM

of 281


31.6.13.3.1 Construction of Inside Exit Stairs and Elevator Hoistway Enclosures.

Enclosures for inside exit stairs and elevator hoistways in air traffic control towers with an occupiable story greater than 75 ft above thelowest level of fire department access shall comply with the following:

(1) Soft Body Impact Classification Level 2 in accordance with ASTM C 1629 shall be met or exceeded for wall assembliesconstructed for inside exit stairs and elevator hoistways.

(2) Wall assembly materials forming the exterior of the enclosure shall be in accordance with one of the following:

(3) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 2 in accordance with ASTM C 1629/C 1629M shall be met or exceeded where a wallassembly includes at least two layers of impact-resistant construction board.

(4) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C 1629/C 1629M shall be met or exceeded where a wallassembly includes at least one layer of impact-resistant construction material.

(5) Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C 1629/C 1629M shall be met or exceeded where a wallassembly is composed of multiple layers tested in tandem of any material.

(6) The requirements of 31.6.13.3.1(1) and 31.6.13.3.1(2) shall not apply to concrete and masonry walls.

(7) Where the impact resistance for Hard Body Impact Classification Level 3 in accordance with ASTM C 1629/C 1629M is met orexceeded, the wall assembly shall be permitted.


The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, and reflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport traffic control towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service and providing consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake and alert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure and the potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.1 is proposed to provide additional protection of vertical shafts used for travel of occupants and is recommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 18 from the WTC Disaster Study Recommendations). Adding structural integrity criteria to these vertical shafts provides additional protection in an occupancy where delayed evacuations may be required. These requirements are common to high-rise buildings in New York City and jurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

Related Item

Committee Input No. 5003-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 31.6.13.3]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage andMiscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, andreflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport trafficcontrol towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service andproviding consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake and


154 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

alert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure andthe potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.1 is proposed to provide additional protection of vertical shafts used for travel of occupants and isrecommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 18 from the WTC Disaster StudyRecommendations). Adding structural integrity criteria to these vertical shafts provides additional protection in an occupancywhere delayed evacuations may be required. These requirements are common to high-rise buildings in New York City andjurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

("air traffic control tower" will be updated to "airport traffic control tower" through the Correlating Committee)


155 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


31.6.13.3.2 Sprayed fire-resistive materials (SFRM)

In air traffic control towers with an occupiable story greater than 75 ft above the lowest level of fire department vehicle access, thebond strength of SFRM installed shall be 430 psf.


The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage and Miscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, and reflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport traffic control towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service and providing consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake and alert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure and the potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.2 is proposed to provide additional structural protection by increasing the minimum bond strengths for sprayed fire-resistant materials as recommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 6 from the WTC Disaster Study Recommendations). This raises the minimum bond strength to 430 psf for all ATCTs with an occupiable story more than 75 ft above the lowest level of fire department access and puts the requirement in line with the IBC. The proposed requirement provides additional protection of the structural frame where delayed evacuations may be required. These requirements are common to high-rise buildings in jurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The proposed changes are included as the recommendation of the Technical Committee on Industrial, Storage andMiscellaneous Occupancies. The details are proposed by the Airport Traffic Control Tower Fire Life Safety Task Group, andreflect the current approach to fire protection and life safety in high rise buildings in general, but are applied to airport trafficcontrol towers (ATCT). The proposed changes relate to providing extra protection for the controllers and fire service andproviding consistency with other building codes and standards.

ATCTs create a unique hazard. ATCTs typically have a limited number of occupants. In addition, occupants must be awake andalert. The hazard associated with ATCTs is affected by the occupied levels being typically located at the top of the structure andthe potential delay in evacuation because of the handoff of flights.

Section 31.6.13.3.2 is proposed to provide additional structural protection by increasing the minimum bond strengths forsprayed fire-resistant materials as recommended by NIST based on the WTC research performed (see recommendation 6 fromthe WTC Disaster Study Recommendations). This raises the minimum bond strength to 430 psf for all ATCTs with an occupiablestory more than 75 ft above the lowest level of fire department access and puts the requirement in line with the IBC. Theproposed requirement provides additional protection of the structural frame where delayed evacuations may be required. Theserequirements are common to high-rise buildings in jurisdictions adopting the International Building Code.

("air traffic control tower" will be updated to "airport traffic control tower" through the Correlating Committee)


156 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


32.2.3.1 General.

In addition to the requirements of this Code, tension membrane structures shall be designed and operated in accordance withASCE/SEI 55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures.


This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.



Public Comment No. 97-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 2.3.7]

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.


157 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


32.2.4.1* General.

In addition to the requirements of this Code, air-supported structures shall be designed and operated in accordance with ASCE/SEI55, Tension Tensile Membrane Structures.


This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of ASCE 55.


158 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


33.3.1.3 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

For high-rise buildings with a total occupant load of 2000 or more persons, a risk analysis for mass notification systemsshall be provided in accordance with Section 55.13.


Mass notification systems may be an important component to larger high-rise building safety and the new provisions of Section 55.13 should be considered for these high-rise buildings with 2000 or more occupants. It is not unusual for large scale high-rise projects to perform a risk analysis addressing areas of concern for high-rise buildings. The required risk analysis will consider both fire and non-fire emergencies, which is consistent with the current all-hazard approach being implemented by many high-rise buildings today. Specific characteristics of high-rise buildings may warrant the need for a mass notification system.

Related Item

First Revision No. 1505-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 55.12]


Submitter Full Name: James Quiter

Organization: Arup

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The thresholds (5000 occupants and 420 ft building height) are intended to correlate with information from NFPA 5000,A.4.2.1. The building height measurement is consistent with the definition of 'high rise building'.

See the submitter's statement on PC No. 105.


159 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 33-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 34.3.2.4.6 ]



5000_CCN_33.pdf 5000 CC Note #33


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 33 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Industrial, Storage, and Miscellaneous Occupancies (IND) to consider theNegative ballot of Pruett to determine if the values proposed in NFPA 5000 for common path of travel are in conflict with NFPA 101.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The revised text is in response to Correlating Committee request and noted ballot comment. The new language correlates thecommon path of travel requirements with those as prescribed in NFPA 101 for high hazard storage and industrialoccupancies.


160 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Industrial, Storage, and Miscellaneous Occupancies (IND) to consider theNegative ballot of Pruett to determine if the values proposed in NFPA 5000 for common path of travel are in conflict with NFPA101.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:20 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.

Any conflicts in travel distance between 5000 and 101 should be resolved prior to acceptance of that change.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:20 PM

of 281


35.1.2.8.3 Steel.

The deflection of steel structural members shall not exceed that permitted by the following, as applicable:

(1) AISC 360, Specification for Structural Steel Buildings

(2) AISI-S100, North American Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Members

(3) ASCE/SEI 8, Standard Specification for the Design of Cold-Formed Stainless Steel Structural Members

(4) SJI CJ -200 , Standard Specifications for Composite Steel Joists, CJ-Series

(5) SJI-100, Standard Specification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders


This comment simply corrects the title of SJI-100 and modifies the short title of SJI-CJ to SJI-200.




Related Item

First Revision No. 7506-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 35.1.2.8.3]




Affilliation: SJI

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This comment simply corrects the title of SJI-100 and modifies the short title of SJI-CJ to SJI-200.


161 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 37.1 ]

37.1.5 Vertical and Lateral Flame Propagation on Exterior Nonbearing Walls

(proposed text is in included file)



NFPA5000ExteriorWallTaskGroupRecommendations_Version_1.docxText, including table, for addition into new section 37.1.5.


This Exterior Wall Task Group was charged with two tasks: 1. Review the June 2014 FPRF “Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components” report2. Determine if changes are needed for NFPA 5000

The Task Group was informed that the FPRF report (Phase 1) will not be followed by a Phase 2 meant to further explore international test methods of exterior walls. The June 2014 report should be considered the final report. Even without Phase 2, this report makes it clear that proper testing and construction compliance of exterior walls containing combustible components are critical to minimize risk of exterior wall fires.

The FPRF report has shown that, when buildings do not comply with adequate fire safety requirements for exterior walls, as is the case in virtually all the examples of fires included in the report, serious fires can occur. No serious fires have been included in the report for buildings protected in accordance with the IBC building code.

The Task Group has determined that the above language should be added to Chapter 37 of NFPA 5000 to ensure proper safety and to further define testing requirements of exterior walls containing combustible components. The proposed wording is the result of experience indicating that exterior wall assemblies containing combustible water-resistive barriers can cause severe flame spread even if the water-resistive barrier is the only combustible present. However, if the water-resistive barrier meets some fire safety criteria as indicated in the proposed language (either by having been tested and meeting specific fire safety criteria or by being covered by a named noncombustible wall covering), testing to NFPA 285 is not needed. Further, the proposed wording would exempt fenestration products and their flashings from being considered part of the water-resistive barrier. These additions to Chapter 37 will clarify the fire testing requirements of exterior walls and bring the intent of NFPA 5000 in line with the intent of IBC Building Code.

This comment has been submitted on behalf of the Exterior Wall Task Group. Members include: Ben Caldwell (task group chair), John Harrington, Lee McCarthy, Jesse Beitel, Vickie Lovell, Thomas McKeon, Luke Woods, Marcelo Hirschler, Richard Davis, and Andy Williams.



Public Comment No. 2-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 37.1]

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Mar 01 17:56:46 EST 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: This Exterior Wall Task Group was charged with two tasks:

1. Review the June 2014 FPRF “Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components” report


162 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

2. Determine if changes are needed for NFPA 5000

The Task Group was informed that the FPRF report (Phase 1) will not be followed by a Phase 2 meant to further exploreinternational test methods of exterior walls. The June 2014 report should be considered the final report. Even without Phase 2,this report makes it clear that proper testing and construction compliance of exterior walls containing combustible componentsare critical to minimize risk of exterior wall fires.

The FPRF report has shown that, when buildings do not comply with adequate fire safety requirements for exterior walls, as isthe case in virtually all the examples of fires included in the report, serious fires can occur. No serious fires have been includedin the report for buildings protected in accordance with the IBC building code.

The Task Group has determined that the above language should be added to Chapter 37 of NFPA 5000 to ensure proper safetyand to further define testing requirements of exterior walls containing combustible components. The proposed wording is theresult of experience indicating that exterior wall assemblies containing combustible water-resistive barriers can cause severeflame spread even if the water-resistive barrier is the only combustible present. However, if the water-resistive barrier meetssome fire safety criteria as indicated in the proposed language (either by having been tested and meeting specific fire safetycriteria or by being covered by a named noncombustible wall covering), testing to NFPA 285 is not needed. Further, theproposed wording would exempt fenestration products and their flashings from being considered part of the water-resistivebarrier. These additions to Chapter 37 will clarify the fire testing requirements of exterior walls and bring the intent of NFPA 5000in line with the intent of IBC Building Code.

This comment has been submitted on behalf of the Exterior Wall Task Group. Members include: Ben Caldwell (task group chair),John Harrington, Lee McCarthy, Jesse Beitel, Vickie Lovell, Thomas McKeon, Luke Woods, Marcelo Hirschler, Richard Davis,and Andy Williams.


163 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

NFPA 5000 Exterior Wall Task Group Recommendations 37.1.5 Vertical and Lateral Flame Propagation on Exterior Nonbearing Walls.

37.1.5.1 Exterior nonbearing walls on buildings of Type I, II, III, or IV construction that are greater than 40 ft (12192 mm) in height

above grade plane shall be tested in accordance with and meet the conditions of acceptance in NFPA 285 unless otherwise

permitted in 37.1.5.2.

37.1.5.2 Where the water‐resistive barrier is the only combustible component, exterior nonbearing walls shall not be required to be

tested in accordance with 37.1.5.1 if either of following conditions applies:

(1) The exterior wall has a wall covering of masonry (including brick), concrete, stone, terra cotta, stucco, or corrosion‐

resistant steel with minimum thicknesses in accordance with Table 37.1.5.2.

(2) The water‐resistive barrier complies with both of the following:

(a) The water‐resistive barrier has a peak heat release rate of less than 150 kW/m2, a total heat release of less than 20 MJ/m2, and an effective heat of combustion of less than 18 MJ/kg as determined in accordance with ASTM E1354. The ASTM E1354 test shall be conducted on specimens at the thickness intended for use, in the horizontal orientation and at an incident radiant heat flux of 50 kW/m2.

(b) The water‐resistive barrier has a flame spread index of 25 or less and a smoke‐developed index of 450 or less as determined in accordance with ASTM E84 or UL 723 with test specimen preparation and mounting in accordance with ASTM E2404.

37.1.5.3 For the purposes of 37.1.5, fenestration products and flashing of fenestration products shall not be considered part of the water‐resistive barrier.

Table 37.1.5.2 Minimum Thicknesses for Exterior Wall Covering Materials

Covering Type Minimum Thickness (inches) Min. thickness (mm)

Masonry Anchored (including brick) Adhered

2.0 0.25

50.8 6.35

Steel (corrosion resistant) 0.0149 0.38

Stone Cast artificial, anchored Natural, adhered

1.5 2.0

38.1 50.8

Stucco or exterior cement plaster *

Three coat work‐over Metal plaster base Unit masonry Cast‐in‐place or precast concrete Two coat work‐over Unit masonry Cast‐in‐place or precast concrete

0.875 0.625 0.625 0.500 0.375

22.2 15.9 15.9 12.7 9.5

Terra cotta Anchored Adhered

1.0 0.25

25.4 6.4

*Exclusive of texture.

of 281


37.1.5 Vertical and Lateral Flame Propagation on Exterior Nonbearing Walls

(proposed text to be added is in included file)



NFPA5000ExteriorWallTaskGroupRecommendations_Version_2.docxText to be included into new section 37.1.5, as an alternate to that proposed in public comment 1.


This Exterior Wall Task Group was charged with two tasks: 3. Review the June 2014 FPRF “Exterior Wall Assemblies Containing Combustible Components” report4. Determine if changes are needed for NFPA 5000

The Task Group was informed that the FPRF report (Phase 1) will not be followed by a Phase 2 meant to further explore international test methods of exterior walls. The June 2014 report should be considered the final report. Even without Phase 2, this report makes it clear that proper testing and construction compliance of exterior walls containing combustible components are critical to minimize risk of exterior wall fires.

The FPRF report has shown that, when buildings do not comply with adequate fire safety requirements for exterior walls, as is the case in virtually all the examples of fires included in the report, serious fires can occur. No serious fires have been included in the report for buildings protected in accordance with the IBC building code.

The Task Group has determined that the above language should be added to Chapter 37 of NFPA 5000 to ensure proper safety and to further define testing requirements of exterior walls containing combustible components. The proposed wording is the result of experience indicating that exterior wall assemblies containing combustible water-resistive barriers can cause severe flame spread even if the water-resistive barrier is the only combustible present. However, if the water-resistive barrier meets some fire safety criteria as indicated in the proposed language (either by having been tested and meeting specific fire safety criteria or by being covered by a named noncombustible wall covering), testing to NFPA 285 is not needed. Further, the proposed wording would exempt fenestration products and their flashings from being considered part of the water-resistive barrier. These additions to Chapter 37 will clarify the fire testing requirements of exterior walls and bring the intent of NFPA 5000 in line with the intent of IBC Building Code.

This public comment differs from another one submitted by the same task group (PC1) in that it provides the option of testing to FM 4880 instead of NFPA 285.

This comment has been submitted on behalf of the Exterior Wall Task Group. Members include: Ben Caldwell (task group chair), John Harrington, Lee McCarthy, Jesse Beitel, Vickie Lovell, Thomas McKeon, Luke Woods, Marcelo Hirschler, Richard Davis, and Andy Williams.



Public Comment No. 1-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 37.1]

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Tue Mar 01 18:04:21 EST 2016

Committee Statement


Resolution: The committee does not agree to use FM 4880 as one of the applicable testing methods


164 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




37.1.5 Flame propagation limits for walls with combustible water-resistive barriers. Exterior walls on buildings of Type I, II, III orIV construction that are greater than 40 feet (12 192 mm) in height above grade plane and contain a combustible water-resistive barriershall comply with Section 37.1.5.1 or 37.1.5.2. For the purposes of this section, fenestration products and flashing of fenestrationproducts shall not be considered part of the water-resistive barrier.

37.1.5.1 Wall assemblies without foam plastic insulation. Wall assemblies that do not contain foam plastic insulation shall complywith one of the following.

1. The water-resistive barrier shall be covered by an exterior wall covering of brick, concrete, stone, terra cotta, stucco or steel withminimum thicknesses in accordance with Table 37.1.5.1.

2. The water-resistive barrier shall comply with 2.1 and 2.2:

2.1 Have a peak heat release rate of less than 150 kW/m 2 , a total heat release of less than 20 MJ/m 2 and an effective heat ofcombustion of less than 18 MJ/kg as determined in accordance with ASTM E 1354. The ASTM E 1354 test shall be conducted on

specimens at the thickness intended for use, in the horizontal orientation and at an incident radiant heat flux of 50 kW/m 2 .

2.2 Have a flame spread index of 25 or less and a smoke-developed index of 450 or less as determined in accordance with ASTM E 84or UL 723.

3. The wall assembly, including the water-resistive barrier shall be tested in accordance with, and shall comply with the acceptancecriteria of, NFPA 285.

37.1.5.2 Wall assemblies with foam plastic insulation. In addition to complying with Section 48.3, wall assemblies that containfoam plastic insulation shall be tested in accordance with, and shall comply with the acceptance criteria of, NFPA 285. The testedassembly shall include the foam plastic insulation and the water-resistive barrier.

Table 37.1.5.1 Minimum Thicknesses for Exterior Wall Covering Materials

Covering Type Minimum Thickness (inches) Min. thickness (mm)

Masonry

Anchored (including brick)

Adhered

2.0

0.25

50.8

6.35

Steel (corrosion resistant) 0.0149 0.38

Stone

Cast artificial, anchored

Natural, adhered

1.5

2.0

38.1

50.8

Stucco or exterior cement plaster *

Three coat work-over

Metal plaster base

Unit masonry

Cast-in-place or precast concrete

Two coat work-over

Unit masonry

Cast-in-place or precast concrete

0.875

0.625

0.625

0.500

0.375

22.2

15.9

15.9

12.7

9.5

Terra cotta

Anchored

Adhered

1.0

0.25

25.4

6.4

*Exclusive of texture.


The intent of this change is to clarify application of the Committee Input #1006 requirements, which is based on the 2015 IBC Section 1403.5 (IBC Code Change FS142-09/10 and was modified by IBC Code Change FS147-12). The proposed revisions to the Committee Input #1006 align the provision for combustible water-resistive barriers in this proposed Section with those for MCM in Section 37.4.4, and foam plastic insulation in Section 48.3.Under the proposed Committee Input #1006, when a combustible water-resistive barrier is installed as part of an exterior wall assembly in Types I, II, III and IV construction, the exterior wall assembly is required to satisfy NFPA 285 unless the barrier complies with proposed Sections 37.1.5.2.1 or 37.1.5.2.2. Both of the sections state that they only apply when the combustible water-resistive barrier is the only


165 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

combustible component in the wall. It was assumed that the underlying exterior wall assembly on buildings of Types I-IV construction would be noncombustible, but that’s not always the case. Sections 7.2.3.2.12, 7.2.4.2.1, 7.2.5.1 and 7.2.5.6.7 allow the use of fire-retardant treated wood (FRTW) in exterior wall assemblies of Types I-IV construction.The unintended consequence of the “water-resistive barrier is the only combustible component” text in the proposed Committee Input #1006 Sections 37.1.5.2.1 and 37.1.5.2.2 is suggesting that every building of Type I-IV construction with exterior walls that contain FRTW and a combustible water-resistive barrier must be tested in accordance with NFPA 285 (because FRTW would constitute a second combustible component). This creates a conflict with NFPA 285 because, NFPA 285 does not apply to buildings that are permitted to have exterior walls of combustible construction or to bearing wall assemblies. The scope of NFPA 285 disqualifies application of the standard.NFPA 285:2012 Section 1.1.1: This standard provides a test method for determining the fire propagation characteristics of exterior non-load-bearing wall assemblies and panels used as components of curtain wall assemblies, that are constructed using combustible materials or that incorporate combustible components, and that are intended to be installed on buildings required to have exterior walls of non-combustible construction.The proponent of IBC Code Proposal FS142-09/10, which created a similar section in the IBC that this Committee Input is modeled after, confirmed that the current text was not intended to require NFPA 285 testing based on the presence of FRTW in an exterior wall, and he indicated that this was neither discussed nor justified as part of the original change. Accordingly, this Public Comment will help to prevent misapplication of the provisions.It should be noted that this Public Comment's Section 37.1.5.2 replaces the Committee's Input #1006 Sections 37.1.5.2.1 and 37.1.5.2..2 Those sections were intended to address the possibility of an NFPA 285 compliant wall assembly with foam plastic insulation becoming non-compliant based on the addition of a combustible water-resistive barrier that was not part of the tested assembly. This Public Comment's Section 37.1.5.2 handles this better by directly stating that the NFPA 285 test assembly must include both the water-resistive barrier and the foam plastic insulation if both will be used.

Related Item





Affilliation: NMHC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The committee did not agree to exempt fire retardant treated wood contained in exterior assemblies from the applicabletesting.


166 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


38.9.7.8 Wind Requirements.

38.9.7.8.1

Through-fastened metal panel roof assemblies applied to a solid or closely fitted deck shall be tested for wind resistance inaccordance with one of the following applicable tests:

(1) ANSI/FM 4474, Standard for Evaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/orNegative Differential Pressures

(2) UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies

(3) UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems

38.9.7.8.2*

Except as noted in 38.9.7.8.3, where the roof functions as the roof deck and roof covering and provides both weather protection andsupport for loads, the structural metal panel roof system shall be tested for wind resistance in accordance with this section. Structuralstanding seam metal panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for StructuralPerformance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference, or FM Approval 4474, Standard forEvaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/or Negative Differential Pressures.Structural through-fastened panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with one of the following:

(1) ASTM E1592

(2) FM Approval 4474

(3) UL 580

38.9.7.8.3

Metal roofs constructed of cold-formed steel, shall be permitted to be designed and tested in accordance with the applicablereferenced structural design standard in Section 44.7.



5000_CCN_34.pdf 5000 CC Note #34


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 34 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Negative ballot of Harrington and add the ANSI designation to the referenced FM Approval 4474 document title in two locations.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 34 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TCon Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Negative ballot of Harrington and add the ANSI designationto the referenced FM Approval 4474 document title in two locations.


167 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



168 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Negative ballot ofHarrington and add the ANSI designation to the referenced FM Approval 4474 document title in two locations.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:21 PM

of 281



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:21 PM

of 281


38.9.7.8.2*

Except as noted in 38.9.7.8.3, where the roof functions as the roof deck and roof covering and provides both weather protection andsupport for loads, the structural metal panel roof system shall be tested for wind resistance in accordance with this section. Structuralstanding seam metal panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for StructuralPerformance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static Air Pressure Difference, or FM Approval 4474, Standard forEvaluating the Simulated Wind Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies Using Static Positive and/or Negative Differential Pressures.Structural through-fastened metal panel roof systems shall be tested in accordance with one of the following:

(1) ASTM E1592

(2) FM Approval 4474

(3) UL 580


This comment editorially modifies the first revision to fully reflect the underlying public input.

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: Refer to Changes made in Second Revision 7504 in response to CC 34


169 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


44.3.1 General.

Systems of structural steel members acting compositely with reinforced concrete shall be designed in accordance with AISC 360 andACI 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete, excluding ACI 318, Building Code Requirements for StructuralConcrete, Chapter 22 14 .


The ACI 318 edition referenced in NFPA 5000, Chapter 2, has been updated to 2014. The provisions for plain concrete were moved from ACI 318-11, Chapter 22, to ACI 318-14, Chapter 14. This comment simply corrects that reference.

Related Item





Affilliation: AISC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The ACI 318 edition referenced in NFPA 5000, Chapter 2, has been updated to 2014. The provisions for plain concrete weremoved from ACI 318-11, Chapter 22, to ACI 318-14, Chapter 14. This comment simply corrects that reference.


170 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


44.4 Open Web Steel Joists and Joist Girders.

The design, manufacture, and use of open web steel joists and joist girders shall be in accordance with SJI-100, StandardSpecification for K-Series, LH-Series, and DLH-Series Open Web Steel Joists and for Joist Girders, or SJI-200, StandardSpecification for Composite Steel Joists, CJ-Series .


This comment fixes Section 44.4 to reflect the original text from PI 205. The full title of SJI 100 was truncated in the first revision. Additionally, the reference to SJI CJ was accidentally eliminated. It should have been retained, since SJI 100 does not cover composite steel joists. Finally, the 2016 edition of the composite steel joist standard has been renamed to SJI-200.




Related Item


First Revision No. 7518-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 44.4]




Affilliation: SJI

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment fixes Section 44.4 to reflect the original text from PI 205. The full title of SJI 100 was truncated in the firstrevision. Additionally, the reference to SJI CJ was accidentally eliminated. It should have been retained, since SJI 100 does notcover composite steel joists. Finally, the 2016 edition of the composite steel joist standard has been renamed to SJI-200.


171 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 109-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Sections 44.6.1, 44.6.2 ]

Sections 44.6.1, 44.6.2

44.6.1

Steel This section shall apply to steel storage racks shall that include, but are not be limited to, pallet storage racks, selectiveracks, movable-shelf racks, rack-supported systems, automated storage and retrieval systems (stacker racks), push-back racks,pallet-flow racks, case-flow racks, pick modules, and rack-supported platforms.

44.6.2

Steel This section shall not apply to steel storage racks shall not that include other types of racks, such as drive-in or drive-throughracks, cantilever racks, portable racks, or racks made of materials other than steel.


These first two sections were adapted by the BLD-SCM from a definition proposed for Steel Storage Racks. The modifications proposed in this comment are editorial and intended to improve the clarity of the section.

Related Item


Public Input No. 207-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 3.3]





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: These first two sections were adapted by the BLD-SCM from a definition proposed for Steel Storage Racks. Themodifications proposed in this comment are editorial and intended to improve the clarity of the section.


172 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


44.8.1 Structural Members.

The For cold-formed steel light-frame construction, the design and installation of the following structural framing systems, includingtheir members and connections utilized in cold-formed steel light frame construction applications , shall be in accordance with AISIS240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing, and 44.8.2 1.1 and 44.8.6 1.2 , as applicable:

(a) floor and roof systems,

(b) structural walls,

(c) shear walls, strap braced walls and diaphragms to resist in-plane lateral loads, and

(d) trusses .

44.8.1.1

Seismic Requirements for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems. The design of cold-formed steel light frame construction to resistseismic forces shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 44.8.1.1.1 or 44.8.1.1.2, as applicable.

44.8.1.1.1 Seismic Design Categories B and C. Where a response modification coefficient, R, in accordance with ASCE/SEI 7,Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Table 12.2-1, is used for the design of cold-formed steel light frameconstruction assigned to Seismic Design Category B or C , the cold-formed steel structural members and connections in the seismicforce-resisting systems and diaphragms of buildings and other structures system shall be designed and constructed detailed inaccordance with the requirements of AISI S400, North American Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel StructuralSystems.

Exception: The response modification coefficient, R, designated for "Steel systems not specifically detailed for seismic resistance,excluding cantilever column systems" in ASCE 7 Table 12.2-1 shall be permitted for systems designed and detailed in accordancewith AISI S240 and need not be designed and detailed in accordance with AISI S400.

44.8.1. 1. 2 Seismic Design Categories D through F. In cold-formed steel light frame construction assigned to Seismic DesignCategory D, E, or F, the seismic force-resisting system shall be designed and detailed in accordance with AISI S400.

44.8.1.2 Prescriptive Framing.

Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses, less than or equal to three stories in height, shall be permitted to beconstructed in accordance with AISI S230, Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing – Prescriptive Method for One- and Two-FamilyDwellings, subject to the limitations therein.


This comment builds on the changes approved in FR 7522 by further clarifying the adoption of AISI S240 and AISI S400.

In Section 44.8.1, the specific structural applications covered in AISI S240 for cold-formed steel light frame construction have been added.

Additionally, Section 44.8.1.1 has been editorially reworked. Since the relationship between AISI S240 and AISI S400 is similar to that between AISC 360 and AISC 341, the charging language in Section 44.8.1.1 has been modified to parallel the language in Section 44.2 for structural steel. It adopts AISI S400 and exempts seismic force-resisting systems only where the seismic design category is B or C and the seismic response modification coefficient, R, equals 3. This is done to recognize that ASCE 7, Table 12.2-1, Line H exempts steel systems from seismic detailing requirements as long as they are designed in accordance with AISI S240.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:




173 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Statement: The technical committee modified the proposed language by deleting the exception and re-wording the text without theexception to conform with the NFPA Manual of Style.


174 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


44.8.1 Structural Members.

The design and installation of structural members and connections utilized in cold-formed steel light frame construction applicationsshall be in accordance with AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing, and 44.8.2 1.1 and44.8.6 1.2 , as applicable.

44.8.1.1

Seismic Requirements for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems. Where a response modification coefficient, R, in accordance withASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, Table 12.2-1, is used for the design of cold-formed steel lightframe construction, the cold-formed steel structural members and connections in the seismic force-resisting systems and diaphragmsof buildings and other structures shall be designed and constructed in accordance with the requirements of AISI S400, NorthAmerican Standard for Seismic Design of Cold-Formed Steel Structural Systems.

44.8.1.2 Prescriptive Framing.

Detached one- and two-family dwellings and townhouses, less than or equal to three stories in height, shall be permitted to beconstructed in accordance with AISI S230, Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Framing – Prescriptive Method for One- and Two-FamilyDwellings, subject to the limitations therein.



5000_CCN_35.pdf 5000 CC Note #35


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 35 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Manley to revise the last sentence in Section 44.8.1 to reference sections “44.8.1.1 and 44.8.1.2” as follows: “…and 44.8.1.1 and 44.8.1.2, as applicable.This action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 35-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 44.8]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: The technical committee modified the proposed language by deleting the exception and re-wording the text without theexception to conform with the NFPA Manual of Style.


175 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 35-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. 44.8 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative withComment ballot of Manley to revise the last sentence in Section 44.8.1 to reference sections “44.8.1.1 and 44.8.1.2” as follows:

“…and 44.8.1.1 and 44.8.1.2, as applicable.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:22 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:22 PM

of 281


45.5.16.2.2 Other Means During Manufacture.

For wood products impregnated with chemical by other means during manufacture, the treatment shall be an integral part of themanufacturing process of the wood product. The treatment shall provide permanent protection to all surfaces of the wood product. The use of paints, coatings, stains or other surface treatments are not an approved method of protection as required in thissection. [703:4.1.2.2]


Clarify that materials produced with surface coating such a paints, stains, and other surface treatments do are not acceptable as FRTW.

Related Item

First Revision No. 7524-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. 45.5.16.2.2 [Excluding any Sub-Sections]]


Submitter Full Name: Joseph Holland

Organization: Hoover Treated Wood Products

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: This section is an extract of NFPA 703 and the proposed language is not included in that extract.


176 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


47.2.1.4.4.2

Structural cold-formed steel studs and track shall comply with AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel StructuralFraming.



5000_CCN_36.pdf 5000 CC Note #36


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 36 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative withComment ballot of Manley and reference the complete title of AISI S240 as follows: AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural FramingThis action will be considered as a public comment.

Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 36 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs theTC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative with

Comment ballot of Manley and reference the complete title of AISI S240 as follows: AISI S240, North American Standard forCold-Formed Steel Structural Framing



177 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Structures, Construction, and Materials (SCM) to consider the Affirmative withComment ballot of Manley and reference the complete title of AISI S240 as follows:

AISI S240, North American Standard for Cold-Formed Steel Structural Framing


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:23 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:23 PM

of 281


55.2.3.7

Audible alarm notification appliances shall comply with NFPA 72.



5000_CCN_37.pdf 5000 CC Note # 37


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note #37 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) to consider the Negative ballot of Larrimer so as to make clear that existing audible devices need not meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 72. The committee should retain the existing performance-based language (rather than deleting it as proposed in the FR) for applicability to existing appliance installations.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: Changes were made to NFPA 101 because 101 addresses existing systems. No changes were needed in NFPA 5000.Previous edition text was retained because it is appropriate for this document.


178 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) to consider the Negative ballotof Larrimer so as to make clear that existing audible devices need not meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 72. Thecommittee should retain the existing performance-based language (rather than deleting it as proposed in the FR) for applicability toexisting appliance installations.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:24 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.

Clarify that that existing audible devices need not meet the requirements of the current edition of NFPA 72. It is recommended that the existingperformance-based language be retained for its applicability to existing installations.


2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:24 PM

of 281




5000_CCN_38.pdf

NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 38 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) and the occupancy committees (AXM, END, HEA, BCF, RES, DET, MER, IND) to review the proposed change and determine if further changes are needed in the Code. The Correlating Committee will revisit the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) after they propose any desired changes.



NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 38 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) and the occupancy committees (AXM, END, HEA, BCF, RES, DET, MER, IND) to review the proposed change and determine if further changes are needed in the Code. The Correlating Committee will revisit the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) after they propose any desired changes.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 38-NFPA 5000-2016 [New Section after 55.12]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: The nature of operations in Detention/Correctional Occupancies do not lend themselves to traditional mass notificationsystems. Site wide notifications are communicated to the staff who must initiate the appropriate actions and measures to take.Additionally, the committee requests the correlating committee to review the terminology for mass notification systems vsemergency communication systems to maintain consistency with NFPA 72 Chapter 24.


179 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 38-NFPA 5000-2016 [ New Section after 55.12 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) and the occupancy committees (AXM, END, HEA, BCF, RES,DET, MER, IND) to review the proposed change and determine if further changes are needed in the Code. The CorrelatingCommittee will revisit the scope of the TC on Building Service and Fire Protection Equipment (BSF) after they propose any desiredchanges.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:25 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:25 PM

of 281


55.13 Risk Analysis for Mass Notification Systems.

55.13.1 Where Required.

Where required by another section of this Code , a risk analysis for mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance withthe requirements of NFPA 72 and the provisions of 55.13.2 through 55.13.4 .

55.13.2 Considerations.

The risk analysis required by 55.13.1 shall additionally address all of the following considerations:

(1) Fire and non-fire emergencies

(2) Specific nature and anticipated risks of each facility

(3) Characteristics of associated buildings, areas, spaces, campuses, equipment, and operations

55.13.3 Emergency Communications System.

An emergency communications system in accordance with NFPA 72 shall be provided where the need for such a system isidentified by the risk analysis required by 55.13.1 , commensurate with the likelihood, vulnerability, magnitude, and potentialconsequences of emergencies.

55.13.4 Emergency Action Plan.

The completed emergency action plan shall be used for the design guideline for the mass notification/emergency communicationssystem.

See attached file for proposed changes.



Chapter_55_Risk_Assessment_Public_Comment_NFPA_5000_Submittal_Ver2.docxPublic Comment to FR 1505 from Dan Gauvin


The Risk Assessment in Section 55.13 should be applicable to Emergency Communication/Mass Notification Systems (both systems are addressed in NFPA 72 Chapter 24). Depending on the results of the risk analysis, either an emergency communication system or a mass notification system may sufficiently serve the need of the emergency action plan (and in some cases neither may be required).

A new section 55.13.1.2 has been added to clarify that the emergency communication/mass notification system is only needed where required by the results of the risk analysis (i.e. there are no prescriptive requirements for an emergency notification/mass notification system). The new 55.13.1.2 also replaces 55.13.3 in the first revision.

A new section 55.13.2 for Performance Design has been added. This section identifies the purpose of the risk analysis, the emergency communication/mass notification system, and the emergency communications/mass notification system emergency action plan that are necessary for identifying system design and performance requirements.

Section 55.13.2 (Considerations) in the first revision has been deleted. The public input language only identified a partial list of the considerations listed in NFPA 72 Chapter 24, and as such, this could be considered a conflict, or at the very least, create confusion between the two documents. The requirements in Section 55.13 for compliance with NFPA 72 Chapter 24 will automatically ensure all considerations will be consistently referenced.

A new section 55.13.3 has been added to identify the documentation requirements, who is responsible for the documents, and the requirement for the required documentation to be submitted to the AHJ. Without these requirements this section would be difficult to enforce.

Where applicable, references to NFPA 72 have been changed to NFPA 72, Chapter 24 (this is the NFPA 72 chapter reference for Emergency Communications Systems which also includes Mass Notification Systems).

Related Item

First Revision No. 1505-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after 55.12]


Submitter Full Name: Daniel Gauvin

Organization: Tyco Fire Suppression and Building Products

Street Address:

City:


180 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Apr 20 18:48:54 EDT 2016

Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: Revisions to the new section on mass notification were made to reflect the submitted public comments, including the option tomove this material to an adoptable annex. This new section provides direction for occupancy chapters to consider a risk analysisrelative to the need for mass notification systems. This section does not require mass notification systems, it only provides theoption for the risk analysis. Where the risk analysis and resulting action plan identifies a need for a mass notification system,NFPA 72 shall be used for design and installation requirements. Mass notification systems are not limited to active shooterevents, they are also used for natural disasters, or other dangerous situations. During the First Draft, the TC asked the CC toreview the scope of the committee to reflect these changes. At this time, the TC does not see a need to revise the scope.

CC Note No. 38 sent this PC to all of the occupancy committees. The following responses are from the other occupancycommittees:

BCF: The Board and Care committee reviewed the requirements in Chapter 9 as modified during the Second Draft. Theprovisions for a risk analysis/mass notification should not apply to board and care facilities.


181 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Proposed Public Comment to NFPA 101 First Revision 1505-NFPA 5000-2015

55.13 Risk Analysis for Mass NotificationEmergency Communication/Mass Notification Systems.

55.13.1 Where Required.

55.13.1.1 Where required by another section of this Code, a risk analysis for emergency communication/mass notification systems shall be provided in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72, Chapter 24 and the provisions of 55.13.2 through 55.13.455.13.3.

55.13.1.2 Where required by the risk analysis in 55.13.1.1, the emergency communication/mass notification system shall be in accordance with the requirements of NFPA 72, Chapter 24.

55.13.2 Considerations.

The risk analysis required by 55.13.1 shall additionally address all of the following considerations:

(1) Fire and non-fire emergencies

(2) Specific nature and anticipated risks of each facility

(3) Characteristics of associated buildings, areas, spaces, campuses, equipment, and operations

55.13.2 Performance Design.

55.13.2.1 The purpose of the risk analysis for the emergency communication/mass notification system shall be to limit or control the consequences, extent, or severity of incidents and scenarios of concern identified through a risk analysis.

55.13.2.2 The purpose of the emergency communication/mass notification system shall be to communicate information about emergencies including, but not limited to, fire, human-caused events (accidental and intentional), other dangerous situations, accidents, and natural disasters.

55.13.2.3 The purpose of the emergency action plan for the emergency communication/mass notification system shall be to identify the emergency communication/mass notification system design and performance requirements in accordance with the results of the risk analysis.

55.13.3 Documentation

55.13.3.1 The emergency action plan, risk assessment report, and accompanying documentation shall be submitted to the authority having jurisdiction by the registered design professional (RDP). The format and content of the documentation shall be acceptable to the authority having jurisdiction.

55.13.3.2* Where required by the authority having jurisdiction, an independent review of the emergency action plan, risk assessment, and the accompanying documentation by one or more individuals possessing expertise in risk characterization for accidental and intentional hazards shall be performed.

A.55.13.3.2 These peer reviews should focus on the assumptions and methods of analysis used and on the findings. Peer reviewers should submit written assessment reports to the AHJ.

55.13.3 Emergency Communications System.

An emergency communications system in accordance with NFPA 72 shall be provided where need for such is identified by the risk analysis required by 55.13.1, commensurate with the likelihood, vulnerability, magnitude, and potential consequences of emergencies.

55.13.4 Emergency Action Plan.

The completed emergency action plan shall be used for the design guidline for the mass notification/emergency communications system.

of 281

Public Comment No. 25-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.570 ]

A.3.3.570 Self-Preservation (Day-Care Occupancy).

Examples of clients who are incapable of self-preservation include infants, clients who are unable to use stairs because ofconfinement to a wheelchair or other physical disability, and clients who cannot follow directions or a group to the outside of a facilitydue to mental or behavioral disorders. It is the intent of this Code to classify children under the age of 30 months as incapable ofself-preservation. Examples of direct intervention by staff members include carrying a client, pushing a client outside in a wheelchair,and guiding a client by direct hand-holding or continued bodily contact. If clients cannot exit the building by themselves with minimalintervention from staff members, such as verbal orders, classification as incapable of self-preservation should be considered.



5000_CCN_24.pdf 5000 CC Note #24


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 24 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to increase the age at which amajority of children are considered capable of self-preservation to between 30 and 36 months in accordance with the Fire Protection Research Foundation’s “Determining Self-Preservation Capability in Pre-School Children” (September 2013). (See corresponding action in NFPA 101.)

18.1.2.1 Occupancies that include preschools, kindergartens, and other schools whose purpose is primarily educational for children24 30 months of age or older, even though the children are of preschool age, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 17.

18.3.5.4 Day-care occupancy buildings with clients under 24 30 months old or clients incapable of self-preservation shall be protected throughout by an approved, electrically supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 55.3.

18.3.7 Subdivision of Building Spaces. Where day-care occupancies, other than day-care homes, with clients who are 24 30 months old or less or who are incapable of self-preservation, are located one or more stories above the level of exit discharge, or whereday-care occupancies are located two or more stories above the level of exit discharge, smoke barriers shall be provided to divide such stories into a minimum of two smoke compartments. The smoke barriers shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.11 but shall not be required to have a fire resistance rating.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 24-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.3.3.567]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Rejected

Resolution: See SR No.6503 and No.3001 which make the requested changes. No changes were made to Section 18.1.2 as it is notrelated to self-preservation age.


182 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 24-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.3.3.567 ]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Educational and Day-Care Occupancies (END) to increase the age at which amajority of children are considered capable of self-preservation to between 30 and 36 months in accordance with the Fire ProtectionResearch Foundation’s “Determining Self-Preservation Capability in Pre-School Children” (September 2013). (See correspondingaction in NFPA 101.)

18.1.2.1 Occupancies that include preschools, kindergartens, and other schools whose purpose is primarily educational for children24 30 months of age or older, even though the children are of preschool age, shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 17.

18.3.5.4 Day-care occupancy buildings with clients under 24 30 months old or clients incapable of self-preservation shall beprotected throughout by an approved, electrically supervised automatic sprinkler system in accordance with Section 55.3.

18.3.7 Subdivision of Building Spaces. Where day-care occupancies, other than day-care homes, with clients who are 24 30 monthsold or less or who are incapable of self-preservation, are located one or more stories above the level of exit discharge, or whereday-care occupancies are located two or more stories above the level of exit discharge, smoke barriers shall be provided to dividesuch stories into a minimum of two smoke compartments. The smoke barriers shall be constructed in accordance with Section 8.11but shall not be required to have a fire resistance rating.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:28 PM

of 281

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:28 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 101-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.5.4.3.3 ]

A.5.4.3.3

The four basic characteristics — sensibility, reactivity, mobility, and susceptibility — comprise a minimum, exhaustive set of mutuallyexclusive performance characteristics of people in buildings that can affect a building's ability to meet the goals, objectives, andperformance criteria of this Code. The characteristics are briefly described as follows:

(1) Sensibility (to physical cues) is the ability to sense the sounding of an alarm and can also include discernment and discriminationof visual and olfactory cues in addition to auditory emanations from an event itself.

(2) Reactivity (ability to interpret cues correctly and take appropriate action) can be a function of cognitive capacity, speed orinstinctive reaction, or group dynamics, and the reliability or likelihood of a wrong decision, such as in situations where familiaritywith the premises influences wayfinding, might need to be considered.

(3) Mobility (speed of movement) is determined by individual capabilities as well as crowding phenomena, such as arching atdoorways.

(4) Susceptibility (to products of combustion) includes metabolism, lung capacity, pulmonary disease, allergies, or other physicallimitations that affect survivability during a building emergency.

In application, as with the use of computer evacuation models, assumptions can address a larger number of factors that arecomponents of these basic response characteristics. Examples are shown in Table A.5.4.3.3.

For a more detailed explanation of occupant characteristics, see the SFPE Engineering Guide to Predicting Human to HumanBehavior in Fire. Occupant characteristics that are discussed in the guide include the following:

(1) Population numbers and density

(2) Lone occupant or with others

(3) Familiarity with the building

(4) Distribution and activities

(5) Alertness

(6) Physical and cognitive ability

(7) Social affiliation

(8) Role and responsibility

(9) Location

(10) Commitment

(11) Focal point

(12) Occupant condition

(13) Gender

(14) Culture

(15) Age

Table A.5.4.3.3 Examples of Response Characteristics

Characteristic Example

Alertness Awake/asleep; can depend on time of day

Responsiveness Ability to sense cues and react

Commitment Degree to which occupant is committed to an activity underway before the alarm

Focal pointPoint at which an occupant's attention is focused; for example, front of classroom, stage, or server inbusiness environment

Physical and mentalcapabilities

Can affect ability to sense, to respond, and to react to cues; might be related to age or disability

Role Can determine whether occupant will lead or follow others

Familiarity Can depend on time spent in building or participation in emergency training

Social affiliation Extent to which an occupant will act/react as an individual or as a member of a group

ConditionOver the course of the fire, the effects — both physiological and psychological — of the fire and itscombustion products on each occupant


Editorial comment. Name of SFPE Guide was incorrect.


183 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281




Related Item

Public Input No. 3-NFPA 5000-2015 [Chapter H]


Submitter Full Name: Chris Jelenewicz

Organization: SFPE

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Editorial comment. Name of SFPE Guide was incorrect.


184 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 26-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.19.3.6.1(1) ]

A.19.3.6.1(1)

The intent is also to permit a space that is compliant with the provisions of 19.3.6.1(1) to be considered open to the corridor eventhough it is physically separated from the corridor by walls and doors. The walls and doors would not need to comply with 19.3.6.2through 19.3.6.5. For example, doors would be permitted without a latch or with a louvre louver .



5000_CCN_26.pdf 5000 CC Note #26


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 26 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Health Care Occupancies (HEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Rickard so as to correct, in the last sentence of A.19.3.6.1(1), the spelling of the word “louver”.


Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Responds to correlating committee note CCN-26.


185 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Health Care Occupancies (HEA) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballotof Rickard so as to correct, in the last sentence of A.19.3.6.1(1), the spelling of the word “louver”.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.


Laramee, Scott T.


1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:14 PM

of 281



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:14 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 91-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.22.3.4.1.1(2) ]

A.22.3.4.1.1(2)

This locates the alarm in the immediate vicinity of the sleeping rooms. NFPA 72, contains related requirements in 11.5.1.1 (2) and11.5.1.2. The requirement in 11.5.1.1 (2) specifies that an alarm is to be installed outside of each separate dwelling unit sleepingarea, within 21 ft (6400 mm) of any door to a sleeping room, with the distance measured along a path of travel. The requirement in11.5.1.2 specifies that, where the area addressed in 11.5.1.1 (2) is separated from the adjacent living areas by a door, a smoke alarmis to be installed in the area between the door and the sleeping rooms, and additional alarms are to be installed on the living area sideof the door.


Currently the code text is more open-ended and the annex text is specific. This Comment is related to a comment that takes the specific requirement of 21 feet and puts it in the code. This comment proposes annex text lets the reader know that the intent is to place the detector within the immediate space outside of the sleeping room.



Public Comment No. 90-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 22.3.4.1.1]

Related Item






Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement


Resolution: The concept was rejected in PC 90 within Chapter 22.


186 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


A.27.4.4. 5.2

Where a pedestrian way meets the requirements for a public way, the means of egress from each tenant space or building ispermitted to terminate at the pedestrian way. For those arrangements, the pedestrian way would not be considered to be a portion ofthe means of egress.



5000_CCN_40.pdf 5000 CC Note #40


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 40 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to relocate the annex language currently showing as A.27.4.5.2 (bulk merchandising) to A.27.4.4.5.2 (malls.) The asterisk is showing in the correct location in the FR text that was balloted but incorrectly in the draft. This CN is related to FR 6511.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 40-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.27.4.5.2]

First Revision No. 6511-NFPA 5000-2015 [Detail]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to relocate the annex languagecurrently showing as A.27.4.5.2 (bulk merchandising) to A.27.4.4.5.2 (malls.) The asterisk is showing in the correct location inthe FR text that was balloted but incorrectly in the draft. This CN is related to FR 6511.


187 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Correlating Committee Note No. 40-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. A.27.4.5.2 ]



Organization: National Fire Protection Assoc

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:

Submittal Date: Wed Jan 13 12:49:42 EST 2016


CommitteeStatement:

The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Mercantile and Business Occupancies (MER) to relocate the annex languagecurrently showing as A.27.4.5.2 (bulk merchandising) to A.27.4.4.5.2 (malls.) The asterisk is showing in the correct location in theFR text that was balloted but incorrectly in the draft. This CN is related to FR 6511.


Ballot Results


18 Eligible Voters

2 Not Returned

15 Affirmative All



0 Abstention

Not Returned

Newman, Michael T.

Wooldridge, Jerry

Affirmative All


Frable, David W.

Francis, Sam W.

Hansen, Raymond N.

Harrington, John C.

Hopper, Howard

Hugo, Jeffrey M.

Humble, Jonathan

Jones, Gerald H.

Leavitt, Russell B.

Quiter, James R.


Shah, Faimeen

Vinci, Leon F.

Willse, Peter J.



1 of 2 3/2/2016 2:29 PM

of 281

Laramee, Scott T.



2 of 2 3/2/2016 2:29 PM

of 281


A.32.2.4.1

See ASCE Guide for Tensioned Tensile Fabric Structures , Design, Analysis and Construction .


This reference should have been updated as part of the modification to Section 32.2.4 in FR7504.




Related Item





Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This reference should have been updated as part of the modification to Section 32.2.4 in FR7504.


188 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 66-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Chapter G ]

Annex G Informational References

G.1 Referenced Publications.

The documents or portions thereof listed in this annex are referenced within the informational sections of this code and are not part ofthe requirements of this document unless also listed in Chapter 2 for other reasons.


189 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.1.1 NFPA Publications.


190 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

National Fire Protection Association, 1 Batterymarch Park, Quincy, MA 02169-7471.

NFPA 1, Fire Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 3, Recommended Practice for Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems, 2018 edition.

NFPA 10, Standard for Portable Fire Extinguishers, 2017 edition.

NFPA 13, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 13D, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in One- and Two-Family Dwellings and Manufactured Homes, 2016edition.

NFPA 13R, Standard for the Installation of Sprinkler Systems in Low-Rise Residential Occupancies, 2013 edition.

NFPA 14, Standard for the Installation of Standpipe and Hose Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 15, Standard for Water Spray Fixed Systems for Fire Protection, 2017 edition.

NFPA 22, Standard for Water Tanks for Private Fire Protection, 2013 edition.

NFPA 30, Flammable and Combustible Liquids Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 30A, Code for Motor Fuel Dispensing Facilities and Repair Garages, 2018 edition.

NFPA 30B, Code for the Manufacture and Storage of Aerosol Products, 2015 edition.

NFPA 45, Standard on Fire Protection for Laboratories Using Chemicals, 2015 edition.

NFPA 55, Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code, 2013 edition.

NFPA 58, Liquefied Petroleum Gas Code, 2014 edition.

NFPA 61, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities, 2013 edition.

NFPA 68, Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting, 2016 edition.

NFPA 70 ®, National Electrical Code ®, 2017 edition.

NFPA 72 ®, National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 80, Standard for Fire Doors and Other Opening Protectives, 2016 edition.

NFPA 80A, Recommended Practice for Protection of Buildings from Exterior Fire Exposures, 2017 edition.

NFPA 82, Standard on Incinerators and Waste and Linen Handling Systems and Equipment, 2014 edition.

NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, 2018 edition.

NFPA 92, Standard for Smoke Control Systems, 2015 edition.

NFPA 96, Standard for Ventilation Control and Fire Protection of Commercial Cooking Operations, 2017 edition.

NFPA 99, Health Care Facilities Code, 2018 edition.

NFPA 101 ®, Life Safety Code ®, 2018 edition.

NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, 2016 edition.

NFPA 101M, Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, 1988 edition.

NFPA 105, Standard for Smoke Door Assemblies and Other Opening Protectives, 2016 edition.

NFPA 110, Standard for Emergency and Standby Power Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA 120, Standard for Fire Prevention and Control in Coal Mines, 2015 edition.

NFPA 170, Standard for Fire Safety and Emergency Symbols, 2015 edition.

NFPA 204, Standard for Smoke and Heat Venting, 2015 edition.

NFPA 211, Standard for Chimneys, Fireplaces, Vents, and Solid Fuel–Burning Appliances, 2016 edition.

NFPA 220, Standard on Types of Building Construction, 2018 edition.

NFPA 251, Standard Methods of Tests of Fire Resistance of Building Construction and Materials, 2006 edition, withdrawn.

NFPA 252, Standard Methods of Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2017 edition.

NFPA 253, Standard Method of Test for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2015edition.

NFPA 257, Standard on Fire Test for Window and Glass Block Assemblies, 2017 edition.

NFPA 259, Standard Test Method for Potential Heat of Building Materials, 2013 edition.

NFPA 262, Standard Method of Test for Flame Travel and Smoke of Wires and Cables for Use in Air-Handling Spaces, 2015 edition.

NFPA 265, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Room Fire Growth Contribution of Textile or Expanded Vinyl Wall Coveringson Full Height Panels and Walls, 2015 edition.

NFPA 269, Standard Test Method for Developing Toxic Potency Data for Use in Fire Hazard Modeling, 2017 edition.

NFPA 275, Standard Method of Fire Tests for the Evaluation of Thermal Barriers, 2017 edition.

NFPA 285, Standard Fire Test Method for Evaluation of Fire Propagation Characteristics of Exterior Non-Load-Bearing Wall


191 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Assemblies Containing Combustible Components, 2017 edition.

NFPA 286, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Evaluating Contribution of Wall and Ceiling Interior Finish to Room Fire Growth, 2015edition.

NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code, 2016 edition.

NFPA 409, Standard on Aircraft Hangars, 2016 edition.

NFPA 551, Guide for the Evaluation of Fire Risk Assessments, 2016 edition.

NFPA 555, Guide on Methods for Evaluating Potential for Room Flashover, 2017 edition.

NFPA 654, Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling ofCombustible Particulate Solids, 2017 edition.

NFPA 664, Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities, 2017 edition.

NFPA 701, Standard Methods of Fire Tests for Flame Propagation of Textiles and Films, 2015 edition.

NFPA 703, Standard for Fire Retardant–Treated Wood and Fire-Retardant Coatings for Building Materials, 2018 edition.

NFPA 720, Standard for the Installation of Carbon Monoxide (CO) Detection and Warning Equipment, 2018 edition.

NFPA 850, Recommended Practice for Fire Protection for Electric Generating Plants and High Voltage Direct Current ConverterStations, 2015 edition.

NFPA 909, Code for the Protection of Cultural Resource Properties — Museums, Libraries, and Places of Worship, 2017 edition.

NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 1122, Code for Model Rocketry, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1144, Standard for Reducing Structure Ignition Hazards from Wildland Fire, 2018 edition.

NFPA 1221, Standard for the Installation, Maintenance, and Use of Emergency Services Communications Systems, 2016 edition.

NFPA Fire Protection Handbook ®, 20th edition.

Fire Protection Research Foundation, Development of an Enhanced Hazard Classification System for Oxidizers, National OxidizingPool Chemicals Storage Fire Test Project, 1998.

G.1.2 Other Publications.

G.1.2.1 ACI Publications.

American Concrete Institute, 38800 Country Club Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331-3434.

ACI 216.1, Code Requirements or Determining Fire Resistance of Concrete and Masonry Assemblies, 2014.

G.1.2.2 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive, Suite 3100, Chicago, IL 60601-2001.

AISC DG02, Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings, 2003.

G.1.2.3 ANSI Publications.

American National Standards Institute, Inc., 25 West 43rd Street, 4th floor, New York, NY 10036.

ANSI Z2, Standard Safety Code for Head, Eye and Respiratory Protection.

ANSI Z535.1, American National Standard for Safety Colors, 2006, reaffirmed 2011.

G.1.2.4 ASCE Publications.


ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010 with Supplement 1, 2017 .


ASCE/SEI 31, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, 2003 2016 .

ASCE/SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural Fire Protection, 2007 2014 .

ASCE 41, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings, 2013 2017 . (Supercedes FEMA 356)

ASCE Guide for Tensioned Fabric Structure, 1996.

G.1.2.5 ASHRAE Publications.

ASHRAE, Inc., 1791 Tullie Circle, NE, Atlanta, GA 30329-2305.

ASHRAE STD 62.1 , Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality, 2013, errata 2013. 2016 . (Supersedes ASHRAE STD 62)

ASHRAE STD 189.1, Standard for the Design of High-Performance Green Buildings, 2014, errata 2013 2015 .


Klote, J. H., and Milke, J. A., Design of Smoke Management Systems.

G.1.2.6 ASME Publications.

ASME International, Two Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990.

ASME A17.1/CSA B44, Safety Code for Elevators and Escalators, 2013.


192 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.1.2.7 ASSE Publications.

American Society of Safety Engineers, 520 N. Northwest Highway, Park Ridge, IL 60068.

ANSI/ASSE A1264.2, Standard for the Provision of Slip Resistance of Walking/Working Surfaces, 2012.

G.1.2.8 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D56, Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Tag Closed Tester, 2005, reapproved 2010.

ASTM D86, Standard Test Method for Distillation of Petroleum Products at Atmospheric Pressure,2012 2015 .

ASTM D93, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester, 2015a .

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved 20112015 .

ASTM D3278, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point of Liquids by Small Scale Closed-Cup Apparatus, 1996, reapproved 2011.

ASTM D3828, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Small Scale Closed Tester Cup Tester , 2012a.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,2013, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E96/E96M, Standard Test Methods for Water Vapor Transmission of Materials, 2014 2016 .

ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2014 2016 .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c2015, (2015)e1 .

ASTM E736/E736M , Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to StructuralMembers, 2000, reapproved 2011 (2015)e1 .


ASTM E1472, Standard Guide for Documenting Computer Software for Fire Models, 2007 (withdrawn 2011).

ASTM E1592, Standard Test Method for Structural Performance of Sheet Metal Roof and Siding Systems by Uniform Static AirPressure Difference, 2005, reapproved 2012 .

ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, 2007, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM E2030, Guide for Recommended Uses of Photoluminescent (Phosphorescent) Safety Markings, 2009a.


ASTM E2238, Standard Guide for Evacuation Route Diagrams, reinstated 2012.

ASTM E2280, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of the Effect of Upholstered Seating Furniture within Patient Rooms ofHealth Care Facilities, 2013.

ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-Story Test Apparatus, 2015a 2015b .

ASTM E2393, Standard Practice for On-Site Inspection of Installed Fire Resistive Joint Systems and Perimeter Fire Barriers, 2010a,reapproved 2015 .

ASTM E2484, Standard Specification for High-Rise Building External Evacuation Controlled Descent Devices, 2008, reapproved2015 .

ASTM E2513, Standard Specification for Multi-Story Building External Evacuation Platform Rescue Systems, 2007, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F1637, Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces, 2013.

ASTM F1677, Standard Test Method for Using a Portable Inclinable Articulated Strut Tester (PIAST), withdrawn last edition, 2005.

ASTM F1679, Standard Test Method for Using a Variable Incidence Tribometer (VIT), withdrawn last edition, 2004. (Withdrawn)

G.1.2.9 AWC Publications.

American Wood Council, 803 Sycolin Road 222 Catoctin Circle , Suite 201, Leesburg, VA 20175.

AWC PWF, Permanent Wood Foundation Design Specification, 2015.

AWC Manual for Engineered Wood Construction, 2005 2015 .

G.1.2.10 BHMA Publications.

Builders Hardware Manufacturers Association, 355 Lexington Avenue, 17th Floor, New York, NY 10017-6603.

BHMA/ANSI A156.10, Power Operated Pedestrian Doors, 2011.

BHMA/ANSI A156.19, Power Assist and Low Energy Power Operated Doors, 2002 2013 .

G.1.2.11 CRC Press Publications.

CRC Press, Taylor and Francis, Boca Raton, FL.

Designing for Situation Awareness: An approach to user-centered design, 2003.


193 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.1.2.12 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919.

FM Data Sheet 1-22, Maximum Foreseeable Loss, 2014.

FM Data Sheet 1-23, Fire Barriers and Protection of Openings, 2012.

FM Data Sheet 1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roof Components, 2010.

FM Data Sheet 1-49, Perimeter Flashing, 2009.

FM Approval 4450, Class 1 Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

FM Approval 4470, Single-ply, Polymer-Modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-Up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Assemblies for use inClass 1 and Noncombustible Roof Deck Construction, 2012.


FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer Ice Balls, 2011.

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials or Coatings andExterior Wall Systems, 2010.

G.1.2.13 IAPMO Publications.

International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials, 4755 E. Philadelphia Street, Ontario, CA 91761.

UPC, Uniform Plumbing Code, 2012 2018 .

G.1.2.14 ICC Publications.

International Code Council, 500 New Jersey Avenue, NW, 6th Floor, Washington, DC 20001-2070.

ICC/ANSI A117.1, American National Standard for Accessible and Usable Buildings and Facilities, 2009.

ANSI/ICC 700, National Green Building Standard, 2012.

G.1.2.15 IEC Publications.

International Electrotechnical Commission, 3 rue de Varembé, P.O. Box 131, 1211 Geneva 20, Switzerland.

IEC 60364-1, Low-Voltage Electrical Installations - Part 1: Fundamental Principles, Assessment of General Characteristics,Definitions, 2005, Corrigendum 1, 2009.

G.1.2.16 SFPE Publications.

Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 380, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. www.sfpe.org

SFPE Code Official's Guide to Performance-Based Design Review, 2004.

SFPE Engineering Guide—Evaluation of the Computer Fire Model DETACT-QS, 2002.

SFPE Engineering Guide to Design Human Behavior in Fire, 2003.

SFPE Engineering Guide to Performance-Based Fire Protection, 2007.

SFPE Evaluation of Enclosure Temperature Empirical Models, Hunt, S., Cutonilli, J. and Hurley, M., 2010.

SFPE Guidelines for Peer Review in the Fire Protection Design Process, 2009.

SFPE Guidelines for Substantiating a Fire Model for a Given Application, 2011.

SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, fourth edition, 2008.

G.1.2.17 RESNA Publications.

Rehabilitation Engineering and Assistive Technology Society of North America, RESNA, 1700 N. Moore St., Suite 1540, Arlington, VA22209–1903. www.resna.org

ANSI/RESNA ED-1, Emergency Stair Travel Devices Used by Individuals with Disabilities, 2013.

G.1.2.18 SFPA/SPC Publications.

Southern Forest Products Association, 6660 Riverside Drive, Matarie, LA 7003 / Southern Pine Council, 2900 Indiana Avenue,Kenner, LA 70065.

Permanent Wood Foundations: Design & Construction, 2013.


194 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.1.2.19 UL Publications.

Underwriters Laboratories Inc., 333 Pfingsten Road, Northbrook, IL 60062-2096.

UL 10B, Standard for Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2008, revised 2015.

UL 10C, Standard for Positive Pressure Fire Tests of Door Assemblies, 2009, revised 2015.

UL 263, Standard for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials, 2003 2011 , revised 2014 2015 .

UL 300, Standard for Fire Testing of Fire Extinguishing Systems for Protection of Commercial Cooking Equipment, 2005, revised2014.

UL 300A, Extinguishing System Units for Residential Range Top Cooking Surfaces, 2006.

UL 580, Standard for Tests for Uplift Resistance of Roof Assemblies, 2006, revised 2013.

UL 723, Standard for Test for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials, 2008, revised 2013.

UL 1040, Standard for Fire Test of Insulated Wall Construction, 2009, revised 2013 2012 .

UL 1256, Standard for Fire Test of Roof Deck Constructions, 2002, revised 2013.

UL 1479, Standard for Fire Tests of Through-Penetration Firestops, 2003, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 1588, Outline of Investigation for Roof and Gutter De-Icing Cable Units, 2002.

UL 1715, Standard for Fire Test of Interior Finish Material, 1997, revised 2013.

UL 1897, Standard for Uplift Tests for Roof Covering Systems, 2004, revised 2012 2015 .

UL 2079, Standard for Tests for Fire Resistance of Building Joint Systems, 2004, revised 2014 2015 .

UL 2196, Tests of Fire Resistive Cables, 2001, revised 2006 2012 .

UL 2424, Outline of Investigation for Cable Marked Limited Combustible, 2006.

UL, Fire Resistance Directory, 2014.

UL UL1724 Outline , Subject 1724, Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems, 2006.

G.1.2.20 UN Publications.

UN Recommendations on the Transport of Dangerous Goods, 18th revised edition, 2014.


195 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.1.2.21 U.S. Government Publications.

U.S. Government Publishing Office, 732 North Capitol Street, NW, Washington, DC 20402 20401-0001 .

16 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 1630, Standard for the Surface Flammability of Carpets and Rugs, 1993.

28 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 36, Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines, 1994.

29 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 1910.146, Permit-Required Confined Spaces,1998 2011 .

29 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 1910.1000, Storage and Handling of Petroleum Gases, 2001.

40 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 260 to 265 and 266 to 299, Hazardous Waste Management System-General.

47 Code of Federal Regulations, Title Telecomunications.

49 Code of Federal Regulations, Title 173, Shippers-General Requirements for Shipments and Packages, 2005.

49 Code of Federal Regulations, Title, Transportation.

EPA, EPA-402-R-93-021.

FEMA Hurricane Katrina Recovery Advisory, Design and Construction in Coastal A Zones, 2005.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 1-93 08 , Openings in Foundation Walls for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993 andWalls of Enclosures , 2008 .

FEMA Technical Bulletin 2-93, Flood Resistant Materials Requirements for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 3-93, Nonresidential Floodproofing — Requirements and Certification for Buildings Located in Special FloodHazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 4-93 10 , Elevator Installation for Buildings Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993 , 2010 .

FEMA Technical Bulletin 5-93, Free-of-Obstruction Requirements for Buildings Located in Coastal High Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 7-93, Wet Floodproofing Requirements for Structures Located in Special Flood Hazard Areas, 1993.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 8-96, Corrosion Protection for Metal Connectors in Coastal Areas, 1996.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 9-99, Design and Construction Guidance for Breakaway Walls Below Elevated Coastal Buildings, 1999.

FEMA Technical Bulletin 10-01, Ensuring that Structures Built on Fill in or Near Special Flood Hazard Areas Are Reasonably Safefrom Flooding, 2001.

FEMA 348, Protecting Building Utilities from Flood Damage: Principles and Practices for the Design and Construction of FloodResistant Building Utility Systems , 1999.

FEMA 356, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, 2000. (Superseded by ASCE 41)

NIST, Feasibility of Fire Evacuation by Elevators at FAA Control Towers, 1994.

UFC 3-340-02 , “Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions ", December 5 , 2008, Change 2, September 1, 2014 .(Supersedes Technical Manual (TM) 5-1300/Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) P-397/Air Force Manual (AFM)88-22 , “Structures to Resist the Effects of Accidental Explosions,” November 28, 1992. )

U.S. Weather Bureau Technical Paper No. 40 “Rainfall Frequency Atlas of the United States for Durations from 30 Minutes to 24Hours and Return Periods from 1 to 100 Years,” Weather Bureau, Dept. of Commerce, 1961.

G.1.2.22 Other Publications.

Ellingwood, B., “Load Combination Requirements for Fire Resistant Structural Design, Journal of Fire Protection Engineering, 15, 1,2005, pp. 43–61.

Gann et al., Fire and Materials, 18:193, 1994.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Factor Considerations in the Potential for Using Elevators in Building Emergency EvacuationPlans,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-92-615, 1992.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Behavior Aspects of Staging Areas for Fire Safety in GSA Buildings,” National Institute ofStandards and Technology, NIST-GCR-92-606, 1992.

Groner, N. E., and B. M. Levin, “Human Factor Considerations for the Potential Use of Elevators for Fire Evacuation of FAA Air TrafficControl Towers,” National Institute of Standards and Technology, NIST-GCR-94-656, 1994.

Hirschler et al., “Carbon Monoxide and Human Lethality.” Fire and Non-Fire Studies,” Elsevier, 1993.

Industrial Ventilation: A Manual of Recommended Practice for Design, 28th 29 th ed., American Conference of GovernmentIndustrial Hygienists, 2013 2016 .

Kaplan et al., Journal of Fire Science, 2:286–305, 1984.

Klote and Milke, Principles of Smoke Management Systems.

Templer, J. A., The Staircase: Studies of Hazards, Falls and Safer Design, MIT Press Publications, Cambridge, MA, 1992.

SEAOC, Recommended Lateral Force Requirements and Commentary (SEAOC Blue Book) (Appendix G), 1999.

Tu, K.-M. and S. Davis, Flame Spread of Carpet Systems Involved in Room Fires, Center for Fire Research, National Bureau ofStandards, 1976.

Waksman, David and Ferguson, John, “Fire Tests of Building Interior Covering Systems,” Fire Technology, Institute for AppliedTechnology, National Bureau of Standards, August 1974.


196 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

G.2 Informational References.

The following documents or portions thereof are listed here as informational resources only. They are not a part of the requirements ofthis document.

UL , Subject 1724 Outline , Outline of Investigation for Fire Tests for Electrical Circuit Protective Systems, 2006.

UL 2196, Tests of Fire Resistive Cables, 2001, revised 2012.

G.3 References for Extracts in Informational Sections.

NFPA 1, Fire Code, 2015 edition.

NFPA 55, Compressed Gases and Cryogenic Fluids Code, 2013 edition.

NFPA 88A, Standard for Parking Structures, 2015 edition.

NFPA 90A, Standard for the Installation of Air-Conditioning and Ventilating Systems, 2015 edition.

NFPA 101 ®, Life Safety Code ®, 2015 edition.

NFPA 221, Standard for High Challenge Fire Walls, Fire Walls, and Fire Barrier Walls, 2015 edition.

NFPA 400, Hazardous Materials Code, 2013 edition.

NFPA 914, Code for Fire Protection of Historic Structures, 2010 edition.

NFPA 921, Guide for Fire and Explosion Investigations, 2014 edition.


Major revisions from FR6054, FR6086, FR6089, FR6090, FR6094, FR6095,FR6096, FR6102, FR6103, and FR6104.



Public Comment No. 61-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. 2.3]

Related Item

First Revision No. 6084-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after H.1.2.1]

First Revision No. 6086-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. H.1.2.7]








First Revision No. 6104-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. H.2]


Submitter Full Name: Aaron Adamczyk


Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: Updates referenced NFPA publications.


197 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Public Comment No. 112-NFPA 5000-2016 [ Section No. G.1.2.2 ]

G.1.2.2 AISC Publications.

American Institute of Steel Construction, One East Wacker Drive 130 E. Randolph St. , Suite 3100 2000 , Chicago, IL 60601-2001 .

AISC DG02, Steel and Composite Beams with Web Openings, 2003.


This comment simply updates the address for AISC to match that in Chapter 2.




Related Item

First Revision No. 6084-NFPA 5000-2015 [New Section after H.1.2.1]




Affilliation: AISC

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: This comment simply updates the address for AISC to match that in Chapter 2.


198 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


G.1.2.4 ASCE Publications.


ASCE/SEI 7, Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures, 2010 2016 with Supplement 1,2017 .


ASCE/SEI 31, Seismic Evaluation of Existing Buildings, 2003.ASCE/ SFPE 29, Standard Calculation Methods for Structural FireProtection, 2007 2017 .

ASCE 41, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings Tensile Fabric Structure, Design, Analysis and Construction , 2013.(Supercedes FEMA 356)

ASCE Guide for Tensioned Fabric Structure, 1996.


This comment cleans up the ASCE references. ASCE 31 and ASCE 41 are no longer referenced in Annex A as a result of FR6079. Additionally, the main body of NFPA 5000 is adopting the 2016 edition of ASCE 7, so the references in the Annexes need to be updated as well. Finally, the reference to the Tensile Fabric Structures guide has also been updated as public comment 113.



Public Comment No. 113-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.32.2.4.1]

Related Item

First Revision No. 6079-NFPA 5000-2015 [Sections 15.1.2.2, 15.1.2.3]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:

Accepted


Statement: This comment cleans up the ASCE references. ASCE 31 and ASCE 41 are no longer referenced in Annex A as a result ofFR6079. Additionally, the main body of NFPA 5000 is adopting the 2016 edition of ASCE 7, so the references in the Annexesneed to be updated as well. Finally, the reference to the Tensile Fabric Structures guide has also been updated as publiccomment 113.


199 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


G.1.2.8 ASTM Publications.

ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, P.O. Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959.

ASTM D56, Standard Test Method for Flash Point by Tag Closed Tester, 2005, reapproved 2010.


ASTM D93, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Pensky-Martens Closed Cup Tester, 2015.

ASTM D2859, Standard Test Method for Ignition Characteristics of Finished Textile Floor Covering Materials, 2006, reapproved2011 2016 .

ASTM D3278, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point of Liquids by Small Scale Closed-Cup Apparatus, 1996, reapproved 2011.

ASTM D3828, Standard Test Methods for Flash Point by Small Scale Closed Tester, 2012a.

ASTM E84, Standard Test Method for Surface Burning Characteristics of Building Materials,2013, 2015a 2015b .


ASTM E119, Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials,2014 2016 .

ASTM E648, Standard Test Method for Critical Radiant Flux of Floor Covering Systems Using a Radiant Heat Energy Source, 2014c2015 e1 .

ASTM E736, Standard Test Method for Cohesion/Adhesion of Sprayed Fire-Resistive Materials Applied to Structural Members, 2000,reapproved 2011.


ASTM E1472, Standard Guide for Documenting Computer Software for Fire Models, 2007 (withdrawn 2011).


ASTM E1966, Standard Test Method for Fire-Resistive Joint Systems, 2007, reapproved 2011 2015 .

ASTM E2030, Guide for Recommended Uses of Photoluminescent (Phosphorescent) Safety Markings, 2009a.


ASTM E2238, Standard Guide for Evacuation Route Diagrams, 2012.

ASTM E2280, Standard Guide for Fire Hazard Assessment of the Effect of Upholstered Seating Furniture within Patient Rooms ofHealth Care Facilities, 2013.

ASTM E2307, Standard Test Method for Determining Fire Resistance of Perimeter Fire Barrier Systems Using Intermediate-Scale,Multi-Story Test Apparatus, 2015a.


ASTM E2484, Standard Specification for High-Rise Building External Evacuation Controlled Descent Devices, 2008.

ASTM E2513, Standard Specification for Multi-Story Building External Evacuation Platform Rescue Systems, 2007, reapproved 2012.

ASTM F1637, Standard Practice for Safe Walking Surfaces, 2013.

ASTM F1677, Standard Test Method for Using a Portable Inclinable Articulated Strut Tester (PIAST), withdrawn last edition, 2005.

ASTM F1679, Standard Test Method for Using a Variable Incidence Tribometer (VIT), withdrawn last edition, 2004.


date updates

Related Item

Public Input No. 45-NFPA 5000-2015 [Section No. H.1.2.7]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:



200 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

Committee Statement





201 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281


G.1.2.12 FM Global Publications.

FM Global, 270 Central Avenue, P.O. Box 7500, Johnston, RI 02919.

FM Data Sheet 1-22, Maximum Foreseeable Loss, 2014 2015 .

FM Data Sheet 1-23, Fire Barriers and Protection of Openings, 2012.

FM Data Sheet 1-29, Roof Deck Securement and Above-Deck Roof Components, 2010.

FM Data Sheet 1-49, Perimeter Flashing, 2009.

FM Approval 4450, Class 1 Insulated Steel Deck Roofs, 1989.

FM Approval 4470, Single-ply, Polymer-Modified Bitumen Sheet, Built-Up Roof (BUR) and Liquid Applied Roof Assemblies for use inClass 1 and Noncombustible Roof Deck Construction, 2012.


ANSI/ FM Approval 4473, Test Standard for Impact Resistance Testing of Rigid Roofing Materials by Impacting with Freezer Ice Balls,2011.

FM Approval 4880, Class 1 Fire Rating of Insulated Wall or Wall and Roof/Ceiling Panels, Interior Finish Materials or Coatings andExterior Wall Systems , 2010 Building Panels or Finish Materials , 2015 .


FM Global References

Related Item



Submitter Full Name: John Harrington

Organization: FM Global

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement



Statement: FM Global References

Editorial correction.


202 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



Society of Fire Protection Engineers, 9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 380, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. www.sfpe.org








SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, fourth edition, 2008.



5000_CCN_39.pdf 5000 CC Note #39


NOTE: This Public Comment appeared as CC Note No. 39 in the First Draft Report. The Correlating Committee directs the TC on Fundamentals (FUN) to consider the Affirmative with Comment ballot of Jacoby and revise the title of the SFPE reference as follows:

SFPE Engineering Guide to Human Behavior in Fire, 2003.


Related Item

Correlating Committee Note No. 39-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. H.1.2.15]




Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: All revision are editorial in nature a) indicate proper name of organization as SFPE, b) Fire Exposure Standard was previouslyreferenced in section 5.5.3.3.3.1, c) indicate correct name of human behavior guide and d) include correct edition of the SFPEhandbook.

SFPE S.01 added to Ch. 2 via separate second revision.


203 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281



Society of Fire Protection Engineers SFPE , 9711 Washingtonian Blvd., Suite 380, Gaithersburg, MD 20878. www.sfpe.org

SFPE 01, The SFPE Engineering Standard on Calculating Fire Exposures to Structures, 2011.








SFPE Handbook of Fire Protection Engineering, fourth fifth edition, 2008 2015 .


All revision are editorial in nature a) indicate proper name of organization as SFPE, b) Fire Exposure Standard was previously referenced in section 5.5.3.3.3.1, c) indicate correct name of human behavior guide and d) include correct edition of the SFPE handbook.



Public Comment No. 101-NFPA 5000-2016 [Section No. A.5.4.3.3]

Related Item

Public Input No. 3-NFPA 5000-2015 [Chapter H]


Submitter Full Name: Chris Jelenewicz

Organization: SFPE

Street Address:

City:

State:

Zip:


Committee Statement

CommitteeAction:



Statement: All revision are editorial in nature a) indicate proper name of organization as SFPE, b) Fire Exposure Standard was previouslyreferenced in section 5.5.3.3.3.1, c) indicate correct name of human behavior guide and d) include correct edition of the SFPEhandbook.

SFPE S.01 added to Ch. 2 via separate second revision.


204 of 204 9/23/2016 12:47 PM

of 281

page 1 of 281 - national fire protection association national standards institute, inc., 25 west...

Documents