palatinate issue 741

The University is to go ahead with plans to integrate the Hild Bede Col-lege library into the Education Li-brary, despite major concerns from the student body.

The proposal would officially make the 40,000 volumes contained within the college library part of the wider University stock and, there-fore, subject to the same regulations.

For example, the Hild Bede library, which has the largest college book collection in Durham, presently al-lows only its own students to take out books on loan. However, should the planned assimilation be imple-mented, books previously retained exclusively for Hild Bede students could be loaned to any Durham stu-dent.

Furthermore, like other college

libraries, the Hild Bede equivalent operates flexible opening hours, es-pecially during peak times such as in the evening, at the weekend and during the exam period. With the merger of the two libraries would also come the extension of the Edu-cation Library opening hours which, at the moment, offer only four hours of access during the weekend.

In addition to its impact on the ac-cessibility of resources to Hild Bede students, the move will subsume books paid for by Hild Bede alumni and the compulsory library charge levied on all college members.

So far, it is this combination of un-favourable library regulations and

diversion of college resources which has caused the most consternation amongst Hild Bede students. Unsur-prisingly, some student representa-tives have expressed severe opposi-tion to the plans.

Matt Woodhams, Hild Bede SRC president, said: “Those responsi-ble for the move clearly do not care about the college or its students. The assimilation of our library overrides the express wishes of Hild Bede stu-dents and alumni.”

University Vice Chancellor Pro-fessor Chris Higgins explained the motivation behind the plans: “The scheme will provide a better stocked library on the Leazes Road site.”

The University’s decision-making process has also received criticism. Initial soundings of student opinion were made in the summer of 2010 but were met with a negative

Incoming Chancellor Sir Thomas Allen talks about his upcoming installation

PalatinateDurham’s student newspaper since 1948

No. 741

Thursday 21st June 2012 | FREEwww.palatinate.org.uk

News, page 3

40,000 Number of books in Hild Bede Library’s collection

Hild Bede students express concern over library loss

Matthew Lee

College library to be merged with Education Department.

Photograph: Delaney Chambers

continued on page 3

Graduation Special: we catch up with graduates past and present

Graduation Special, pages 9-11

Thousands braved the rain to watch BBC presenter Matt Baker carry the Olympic torch on to Durham University’sRacecourse Sports Grounds Photograph: Nicoletta Asciuto

Fears that privileges of Hild Bede students will be lost.

Film: Do the viral ads for Prometheus mislead the viewer?

Music: Van Mildert’s festival Jam by the Lake reviewed

Comment: Were the Jubilee celebrations justifable?

Editors-in-ChiefLarry BartleetCharlie [email protected]

Deputy EditorsAlexandra Bottomer & Olivia [email protected] EditorsKatie Pavid & Julia [email protected] Features Editor Christopher [email protected] News EditorsMatt Lee, Harriet Line & Emma [email protected] EditorJon [email protected] Editor Amy [email protected] EditorJessica [email protected] EditorsFlo Snead & Joe [email protected] Editors Spencer Brown & William [email protected] Sport Editors Kate Houghton, Hugh McDowell, Will Rudd & Tom [email protected]

Indigo Editors Molly Fowler & Alexandra [email protected] EditorSarah [email protected] Features EditorsCatherine Bradfield & Sarah HolmesFood and Drink Editor Belinda [email protected] Editor Ellie [email protected] EditorOlivia SwashDeputy Fashion EditorsSophia Chan & Ella [email protected] and Television Editor Ed [email protected] EditorAnna [email protected] Stage EditorsGabriel SamuelsMusic Editors Jess Denham & Will [email protected] Music EditorPatrick [email protected] Editor Justina [email protected] Sub-EditorKelsey [email protected] Sub-Editors Alice Melton, Rebecca Lee, Rebecca Paul, Malik Al-Mahrouky & Gemma NealeChief Web Editor Rhiannon [email protected] EditorNicoletta [email protected] Photography EditorsKatherine Merchant, Asher Haynes, Kelsi Butler & Anni [email protected] EditorJames [email protected] TV Station ManagerLivia [email protected] EditorJulie [email protected] Officer Tilly [email protected] Officer Matt Lee

Editorial2

www.palatinate.org.uk

Thursday 21st June 2012 | PALATINATE

Editorial Board

No.74121.06.2012

Palatinate is published by Durham Students’ Union on a fortnightly basis during term and is editorially independent. All contributors and editors are full-time students at Durham. Send letters to: Editor, Palatinate, Durham Students’ Union, Dunelm House, New Elvet, Durham, DH1 3AN. Alternatively, send an e-mail to [email protected]

ContentsPalatinate

News pages 3-8

Business pages 12-13

Grad’s Special pages 9-11

Comment pages 14-16

Sport pages 17-20

indigo

Edtorial page 2

Features pages 4-5

Music pages 6-7

Stage page 13

Fashion pages 8-9Food & Drink pages 10-11Film & TV pages 12

Books page 3

Travel pages 14-15

Colleges will always show hostility to difficult central decisions: it’s the ‘Durham Difference’If you thumb over the pages of this last edition of Palatinate for the academic year, there is a substantial amount of discussion of what makes Durham ‘different’.

Much of the debate (see our Grad-uation Special, or Daniel Johnson’s Comment article on p.16) centres on the propensity of students here to devote countless hours to extra-cur-ricular activities, often at the expense of their studies. This means that the quality of our sporting, charitable and artistic achievements is sensa-tional.

However, there is an alternative and equally potent suggestion: that Durham’s set of sixteen vibrant, pas-sionate and, most importantly, semi-autonomous colleges make it stand out from the scholarly crowd.

The degree of independence the colleges possess gives them their dis-tinctive character and helps create a fierce sense of pride at being a mem-ber of whichever college you found yourself in as you entered Durham as a fresh-faced fresher. From JCRs to College offices, the significant degree of devolved power to these bodies al-lows individual colleges to shape the lives of their students. Colleges pro-vide services and entertainment tai-lored to the communities they serve.

Recent news, which you can read in the subsequent pages of this Pa-latinate, shows the anger and disap-pointment felt by college administra-tions and JCRs alike when substantial change is forced upon them, which

they feel will have a detrimental ef-fect on the lives of students.

Many students have voiced con-cerns about the ‘assimilation’ of Hild Bede Library with that of the Educa-tion Library (p.1 & 3) and the remov-al of the JCR-elected sabbatical Bar Steward position at St. Cuthbert’s (p.6).

The concerns expressed in both cases are worrying for the affected students. The former could possibly hamper the learning resources dedi-cated to Hild Bede members, while the latter might suggest that the JCR is losing an element of control over its College bar.

Whether or not these changes will have the negative effects their de-tractors claim, these two situations highlight how central University gov-ernance can quickly and efficiently enforce changes on various Colleges, in a way that might feel as if students are not being properly consulted.

Admittedly, de-centralised col-leges are not infallible institutions and on a large number of issues, central decision-making is essential. It makes sense, for example, to have standardised accommodation costs across the University and there is a strong case for sabbatical or JCR officers not possessing the highest level of professional skills and quali-fications. This is, of course, why there are only four sabbatical positions in DSU alongside numerous full-time employees, and this is why colleges

employ large numbers of profession-al staff to look after their students.

There is an interesting paradox expressed in the above stories. JCRs and DSU provide layers of represen-tation for the student body. However, the Hild Bede and St. Cuthbert’s situ-ations see many students claiming that the University or the College administration has not sufficiently consulted them.

It is likely that in both scenarios, arguments will be made both ways and the University administration will insist that they took time over consultation, while aggrieved stu-dents will claim the reverse.

There is no need to adjudicate on such issues. However, they do high-light the anger that can be felt when students feel their concerns are not being taken into account by the cen-tral body.

It is important that the views of JCR leaders, and those of the students they represent, are taken seriously. Colleges at Durham are distinctive bodies who still possess sufficient power to shape thriving, diverse stu-dent communities. The University celebrates the Colleges’ diversity as part of the ‘Durham Difference’ al-lowing them freedom become indi-vidual communities. Therefore it is inevitable that when central deci-sions are made which students feel will detract from college life, the re-action from these communities will be fierce and proud. Charlie Taverner & Larry Bartleet

Preview: Spring Awakening Profile: Mark Silversides

Back page page 16

Corrections and clarifications: In issue 737 of Palatinate, the statistic on the front page was incorrectly labelled. The figure of 13% was referring to a 2008 referendum, and not the ‘most recent referendum’ at Van Mildert college. The turnout for the most recent referendum was in fact 50%. The figure of 96% for a vote at St John’s on a games console was incorrect - the actual turnout was 91%. We also omitted St John’s and St Chad’s from the list of colleges that decided not to become Durham Student Organisations. We apologise for the errors and any offence that resulted.

Remember to check out the last releases of term, including interviews, news and features.

Opera star Sir Thomas Allen is pre-paring to be installed officially as the new Chancellor of Durham Univer-sity on Tuesday 26th June.

He will be the 12th Chancellor to receive the robes and cap and take the oath of office in an installation ceremony in Durham Cathedral.

Speaking about his new role, Sir Thomas said: “The installation and everything surrounding it have been occupying my mind for what seems like years, and is in fact just a few short months.

“It’s one of those occasions that has no onerous issues attached which allows me personally to bring together family and friends to share a uniquely special occasion in my life”.

When the announcement was made in 2011, Allen spoke of his pride at having grown up in the county and felt the appointment meant he was “coming home.” He is positive about the University’s local and international reputation:

“The University is a source of pride for any North-Easterner. I may be bi-ased slightly, but I know that when I was in Hong Kong recently and saw the University badge on an enor-mous poster in Kowloon, amongst a number of others displaying their wares, it made me immensely proud.

“I happen to think that was not just the Chancellor in me, but also the North-East man. I believe many, many North Easterners would have thought likewise.”

Allen is a world-renowned oper-atic baritone, having studied at the Royal College of Music and worked with both the Welsh and English National Operas. As well as perform-ing on the international stage, he has performed in London’s Covent Gar-den for over 35 years. In 1989, he was made a Commander of the Or-der of the British Empire (CBE) and he was knighted in the 1999 Queen’s Birthday Honours.

He encouraged the students of Durham to make the most of the op-portunities which the unique institu-tion offers them: “University is not a God-given right. You are here having worked hard to gain a precious place in an extraordinary institution. Enjoy yourself, work hard, play hard.

“The opportunities you have here will not come again in your life. Be a sponge, be curious and learn about everything that life has to offer in your chosen field and then whatever else the place offers.

“And Durham is a lovely, special place, the county, the city. You may or may not return to it afterwards, but learn of its values whilst you are here. They are, I can assure you, remarkable, along with its warm-hearted people”.

Allen intends to enjoy his time as Chancellor, and declared his desire to aid the growth of the Durham com-munity: “There are serious things to be addressed always, but I would like to think that my face will become familiar around the University and in the streets of Durham. You’ll find me wandering there frequently if I have anything to do with it, and I hope that any student should find me ap-proachable.

“I have a concern, born I believe of the focus and dedication necessary to become a serious artist, that we are largely too insular and perhaps even isolated.

“I want to encourage a crossing over of interests that I think will bring benefits to all. We need to work towards a world devoid of cultural and racial prejudices to one of great-er understanding and tolerance.

“I believe the seed of that may well lie within the life of our Univer-sity and I would feel I’d have served some good if we could see the growth of greater understanding”.

The Chancellor’s installation will be taking place at 10:30am on 26th June at Durham Cathedral. Students are encouraged to attend, and can register for free tickets at http://bit.ly/MCPUyh

New

s

NewsPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012


3

News Editors: Julia ChapmanKatie [email protected]

@PalatinateUK

Palatinate - Durham’s Official Student Newspaper

PFor more, visit palatinate.org.uk

>> Scientists at Durham work on European Extremely Large Telescopepage 4

Incoming Chancellor Thomas Allen prepares for installation

College Library to merge with Education Department

Katie Pavid

Thomas Allen speaks of his pride in Durham University and the reputation of the North-East Photograph: Sussie Ahlburg

response. Despite this, plans for the assimilation were revealed in Janu-ary.

One Hild Bede second year said: “It’s an outrage that the University hierarchy can just completely ignore student opinion and get away with it.”

Another second year remarked: “It doesn’t take a genius to figure out we’re going to be at a disadvantage compared to other colleges.”

Despite much criticism of hte proposals, other Hild Bede students were less concerned.

A first year student noted: “Per-sonally, I prefer to work in the Educa-tion library and I don’t think I’ve ever

taken a book out of the Hild Bede Library”.

Professor Higgins further com-mented: “It is pleasing to see the Li-brary and Hild Bede College working in partnership to enhance library ac-cess.”

To assuage student fears, the Vice-Chancellor has also promised “more student study space in Hild Bede” as well as hinting at the possibility of longer opening hours for the com-

bined library. In response to criticisms of the

decision making process, Professor Higgins said that “the Leazes Road site was approved two years ago by Hild Bede College Council and the University Library Committee, both of which include elected student rep-resentatives.”

Nevertheless, the vocal opposition is likely to prevent any chance of a smooth and swift assimilation.

Continued from page 1

“We’re going to be at a disadvantage”Hild Bede second year student

University proposals to create a ‘Faculty of Colleges’ have had to be shelved after opposition in the Sen-ate, Durham University’s supreme governing body for academic mat-ters.

On 1st May at Hild Bede College, a show of hands almost led to the mo-tion being passed before calls for the proposals to be put to a written bal-lot were accepted. The first ballot in Senate for nine years saw 17 votes in favour, 28 against and 3 abstentions, meaning the Senate did not recom-mend the proposed statue changes to the University’s executive body, Council.

The proposed transition from the Colleges Division to a Faculty of Col-leges would recognise the increased role of colleges in education and re-search at the University.

The paper put to the Senate sug-gests that the organisational change would “frame the Colleges first and foremost as scholarly communities in which academic activities are un-dertaken in support of the University Strategy under the leadership of sen-

ior academics.”The general principle of acknowl-

edging further the Colleges’ informal academic role has been developed throughout a long period of consul-tation with staff and student repre-sentatives, and the notion was ap-proved by the University Executive Committee, Senate and Council in their respective February and March 2012 meetings.

Professor Graham Towl, Deputy Warden of the University, said in a statement: “Our colleges are scholar-ly communities with scholarly lead-ership from our Heads of Colleges, all of whom are senior members of our academic staff at Durham University.

“We are keen to both recognise the excellent work of our College communities and also further enable such scholarly work to flourish in the future.”

When the paper outlining the re-ality of the statute change was circu-lated prior to the May meeting, con-cerns were raised that the precise nature Faculty of Colleges concept blurred the lines between colleges and academic departments.

Professor Ranald Michie, Senior Lecturer in the Department of His-tory, circulated a paper via email to

fellow Senate members prior to the meeting expressing concern. His note of opposition suggested that with the title ‘Faculty’ there would be ambi-guity over where degree-awarding powers would lie (currently they are devolved to the three academic Fac-ulties).

Furthermore, he suggested the Faculty of Colleges statute change could potentially harm the unique formal and informal academic com-munities that the current form of Departments and Colleges provides, which allows students to meet a wide range of peers and academics

to focus on high quality research.The paper said: “Colleges have a

very important contribution to make to the ongoing success of Durham University a successful academic in-stitution. So do the existing Faculties and the departments and individual

institutes that they contain. “We should not confuse the dis-

tinctive contribution that each make by giving them the same name as the proposed Statute change does.”

Prior to the meeting, Professor Michie requested, as is his right as a Senate member, that preparations were made for a written ballot on the proposed statute changes. Reports from the 1st May meeting suggest that when the Faculty of Colleges proposals arose, the Chair of Sen-ate (Vice Chancellor Professor Chris Higgins) wanted to accept the posi-tive show of hands as the approval of Senate.

However, Professor Michie reas-serted the right to hold a written ballot, giving a short speech express-ing his concerns, before voting slips were distributed.

Subsequently, the result of show of hands was reversed by the ballot’s rejection of the proposals.

The holding of a written ballot at Senate was the first since 29th Sep-tember 2003. Usually, motions are decided by a public show of hands.

Alongside the reversal of the re-sult, Palatinate has been informed by numerous witnesses that the bal-lot itself was handled poorly. Several

Senate members expressed uncer-tainty over the wording of the bal-lot, particuarly whether they were debating the general principle of the colleges’ academic role or the ‘Fac-ulty of Colleges’ name.

Professor Towl added: “The reor-ganisation and development of the College’s Division to reflect the devel-opment of the individual Colleges as scholarly communities was strongly endorsed and approved formally by both Senate and Council.

“Some staff at Senate had concerns about the use of the term ‘Faculty of Colleges’ and discussion and debate on such matters is important in a university community. However, this will not in any way deflect the growth and development of the very special College system which contributes so much to the Durham education and student experience.”

Following the meeting, the Faculty of Colleges statute changes were not put to the Council at the meeting on 15th May and therefore will not be going ahead. Instead, a proposal will be made to the 19th June meeting of Senate for the current ‘Colleges Divi-sions’ to drop the word ‘Division’, but not to become a Faculty.

News4



Proposal for ‘Faculty of Colleges’ rejected by SenateCharlie Taverner

Durham collaborates on world’s largest ground-based telescope

The programme for the world’s larg-est ground-based telescope, which involves scientists at Durham Uni-versity, has been approved by the Council of the European Southern Observatory (ESO).

The European Extremely Large Telescope (E-ELT), which was ap-proved on Monday 11th June, will be the largest optical or near infrared sensor in the world, and will help to improve the understanding of dark matter and dark energy – something which has not yet been directly ob-served.

E-ELT will have a 39m diameter optical or infrared telescope, which should be over ten times more sen-sitive than any current telescope of its kind. It will collect 12 times more light than the current largest optical telescope.

Construction, however, will not commence until provisional votes from the member states are con-firmed and 90% of the required funding is secured. Competition for industrial contracts will be open to all member states, to a value of £645 million.

The UK has a strong position con-sidering its ability in optics manufac-ture, detectors, software and struc-tural engineering.

Durham University will collabo-rate with the University of Oxford,

Science and Technology Facilities Council, UK Air Traffic Control and Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Space programme, as well as other leading institutions and UK indus-tries.

The UK’s major involvement in the planned first light instrument has been attributed to the country’s world leading scientific and technical capabilities. UK scientists are promi-nent in the discoveries with the new telescope.

Research institutions will benefit financially from their involvement, and so far £8 million has been won by the UK for work in the precon-struction phase.

Professor Simon Morris, Deputy Head of Physics at Durham, and co-Principal Investigator for the EAGLE instrument, said that “the European Extremely Large Telescope will greatly surpass the already amazing suite of four Very Large Telescopes.

“It will have a huge light collecting area, with ways of correcting atmos-pheric blurring, and the ability to ob-serve large numbers of faint, distant galaxies at once.

“This will allow UK astronomers, in collaboration with our European colleagues, to solve many current mysteries about the way in which the Milky Way formed. UK astronomical instrument builders are also very ex-cited to be taking a number of lead-ing roles in the planned cameras and spectrographs for the telescope.”

Harriet Line

It is hoped that the telescope will solve mysteries surrounding the formation of the Milky Way Photograph: ESO E-ELT archive

September 2003The last time the University Senate held a written ballot

NewsPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012 5


University considers building two new colleges by 2020Julia Chapman

On Wednesday 13th June, members of Grey College invited children from three local special needs schools to a second sports day event as part of the college’s Grey in the Community initiative.

The first of these events took place on the 29th of February to great ac-claim. Over 35 children and adults joined Grey students for a day of sport, music and craft-making.

Wednesday’s activities emulated the first day’s successful formula as a total of 30 special needs students from three different Durham schools tried their hand at a range of sports inside Durham’s recently renovated sports complex at Maiden Castle, in-cluding curling, tag rugby and row-ing.

The students were then driven back to Grey, where they had lunch and enjoyed an afternoon of live music performed by students of the college in Fountains Hall including beat-boxing from John Oliver and a well-received routine by the Grey Cheerleaders.

The students were also given the opportunity to express their creative

side with a range of arts and crafts activities.

The highlight of the afternoon was the opportunity for the children to meet and shake the hand of British Paralympian swimmer Ben Proctor, winner of a 200m freestyle bronze medal at the 2010 World Champion-ships, who also suffers from learning disabilities.

Ben presented a certificate and trophy to each child individually to complete the day’s proceedings.

“The reward was really in the day itself; the kids have so much energy and it’s our job to match that as far as we can, and give as much back to them as possible”, enthused Hannah Langton, organiser of the Grey in the Community scheme.

Concerned by the widening the gulf between “town and gown”, Lang-ton and JCR President Turner estab-lished the initiative at the start of this academic year as a way for Grey Col-lege to give something back to the lo-cal community.

Recent initiatives include organis-ing a range of visits to local schools including St Michael’s Primary School, a visit to elderly residents at Hallgarth Care Centre and a trip to Holme House Prison in Stockton.

The programme has received generous funding from Durham City Council’s Disability Commission, the board of Grey College Trustees and from personal sponsorships, a large portion of which was afforded to the running of the two sports day events. The scheme was recently described by the University as “a model of Dur-ham college life at its best.”

Feedback from participants re-ceived by the college following the two sports days was overwhelmingly positive in nature, with everyone in-volved in agreement regarding the success of the events and the benefits of the initiative as a whole.

“Our service users were always treated as equals, with dignity and respect”, wrote Tina Outhwaite of Auckland Gate Day Centre, “we all felt very much part of your commu-nity”. Gail Hopper of Durham County Council wrote of how “the approach of the students and staff to the task at hand was a credit to Grey College and the University as a whole”.

Grey in the Community are look-ing to build on these successes in the next academic year. If you would like to get involved with the initia-tive in the future, or to donate, email [email protected]

Grey College hosts children’s sports day as part of community initiativeGabriel Samuels

Special needs students participate in the Grey in the Community initiative Photograph: Lubee Abubakar

Durham University is planning to expand its accommodation further to create an extra thousand bed spaces for students and staff.

The University has started to address issues of oversubscrip-tion in some colleges by beginning small-scale refurbishments and is now looking to build new college accommodation in both Durham and Stockton.

Speaking to Palatinate, Profes-sor Chris Higgins, the University’s Vice-Chancellor, was adamant that any developments of accommoda-tion at Durham University will be collegiate, either incorporating new buildings into existing col-leges or establishing entirely new colleges.

The plans for growth have emerged following an increase in student numbers over the last few years. Professor Higgins said, “We are not looking to increase those substantially any more. We are still growing, to some extent, our postgraduate numbers, but the university overall is not going to grow substantially.”

The area the University believes has the greatest scope for devel-opment of new accommodation is

the Mount Oswald site which is lo-cated on the South side of the city next to Van Mildert College.

The land in this area is cur-rently owned by the Banks Group, a property development company with the intention to build a resi-dential complex on the land.

Recently, the Banks Group put forward a proposal to build a hall of residence for students, which was rejected by the University, which insists on maintaining the University’s collegiate environ-ment for all students.

Instead, the land owned by the Banks Group will be developed into housing which will be suit-able for university staff and their families.

In addition to maximising the number of students who can live in college during their time at Dur-ham, the University is in the midst of several college refurbishments, with works currently ongoing in St. John’s College, due to be ready for the 2012/2013 intake.

Other plans for refurbishment are underway, with a focus on making all college residences ap-propriate for student living, de-spite the many restrictions on building and renovating in Dur-ham City.

It is also the University’s inten-tion to demolish a block on the Hild Bede site in order to make way for a brand-new set of accom-modation.

Existing student accommoda-tion is expected to be universally fit for purpose by 2018.

Other, smaller, developments will be taking place in colleges both on the Bailey and the Hill.

St. Chad’s College, the smallest college at Durham University, is having a new block built as well as taking over a building on Church Street.

Chad’s is also likely to acquire the Queen’s Court building when the Music department relocates.

Hatfield College will acquire the old boiler site which will be turned into further accommodation.

The expansions within exist-ing colleges will generate no more than five hundred bed spaces.

The University is hoping to have at least a thousand new bed spac-es by 2020.

Because of this, other areas such as Mount Oswald are being

considered.The University is also planning

to develop a new accommodation complex at Queen’s Campus in Stockton.

A property in the North Shore area of Stockton has been pur-chased by the University and building is expected to commence in the next two years.

The new accommodation in Stockton will either be affiliated with one of Stephenson or John Snow College or will create a new

college altogether.Additionally, the University has

plans to encourage balance be-tween undergraduate students, postgraduate students and staff living within the college communi-ties.

New accommodation growth will also enable students greater flexibility in catering style when living in college.

Professor Higgins said, “First-year students usually just want

to eat in college, but returners or postgraduates often want some level of self-catering, and not all colleges are configured for that”.

As a result, Grey College has recently adapted one accommo-dation block to provide a self-catered option for students living in college, and other colleges will soon be adopting a similar course of action.

On the other hand, self-catered college Josephine Butler will be given a kitchen to facilitate small-scale formal dinners.

In terms of the financial impli-cations of such ambitious devel-opments, Professor Higgins confi-dently expressed the University’s comfortable financial situation by saying, “As a university we’re doing reasonably well financially, we’re making a good surplus”.

The surplus earned by the University is invested in future projects, predominantly the planned accommodation develop-ments.

Already, the University spends £5m to £6m annually on refur-bishments.

The 2005 construction of Usti-nov and Josephine Butler Colleges cost £35m, and the University an-ticipates that the Mount Oswald build will be roughly as expensive.

1000The number of extra bed spaces the University ex-pects to provide by 2020

“As a university we’re doing reasonably well financially”Vice-Chancellor Professor Chris Higgins

News6



This summer will see a substantial amount of money spent to refurbish Dunelm House and attempt to bring it into the 21st century.

Proposals are in the advanced stages for a full redevelopment of the entire building both inside and outside. Over £380,000 has been set aside to be spent. The details are cur-rently being finalised, with work set to begin in July.

Mike King, the current DSU Presi-dent, claims that the works will turn Dunelm House into the world class Student Union that Durham Students have both asked for and deserve.

Dunelm House was designed by acclaimed Anglo-Danish architect

Sir Ove Arup, the same man who designed the Sydney Opera House. Arup designed both Kingsgate Bridge and Dunelm House as a joint piece of work, which was upon its completion considered glorious ar-chitecture.

One second year student com-mented: “It’s just such an ugly build-ing in the middle of a beautiful city. Durham University doesn’t really suit the concept of a Union due to the college system, but if it were a little more comfortable and welcoming I’m sure people would be much more prepared to use its facilities.”

This investment in refurbishing Dunelm House has shown the Uni-versity’s commitment to restoring Dunelm House to its former glory. It was originally designed as a centre that gives students central facilities

not provided by the colleges.The space is heavily used, with

multiple societies utilising the city centre location on a regular basis. However, the DSU building has been in need of a refit for several years now.

One third year finalist com-mented: “Just during the past three years I have witnessed the decline of Dunelm House; now there aren’t even any club nights held there, whether regular or one-off occa-sions. Hopefully these refurbishment plans can regain student enthusiasm for it.”

The Fonteyn Ballroom in the DSU is reported as being the largest func-tion room in Durham City, but it is not equipped with the facilities to take full advantage of the space.

The current academic year has

seen investment in the new Activity Centre, as well as refurbishments of most of the toilets.

However this has failed to change the opinion of the majority of stu-dents of the DSU, something that the upcoming refurbishment works will hope to change.

These works will include major upgrades to the Riverside Café and the Fonteyn Ballroom. The River-side Café, which is losing custom to Durham’s wide variety of cafés, will become a café/bar, with new furni-ture and increased plug sockets for laptops.

The Fonteyn Ballroom floor will also be replaced with a vinyl floor to better suit the variety of societies that wish to use it than the current wooden form.

The Kingsgate Bar will also see

minor refurbishments that will in-crease its suitability as a space for societies and activities as well as its function as a bar.

Landscaping to the surrounding areas of Dunelm House will also aim to improve the look of the DSU from outside.

A second year student comment-ed: “I look forward to seeing the changes, but for me the DSU needs a full scale refit with much more than £380,000 going towards the refur-bishments.

“I have been really impressed with the new library wing, and the work on the new law buildings on the sci-ence site should be a credit to the University. Hopefully the DSU will be able to keep up.”

Large-scale DSU refurbishment approachesChristopher Murphy

The College office of St. Cuthbert’s Society has introduced a profes-sional Bar Manager and repositioned the role of the Bar Steward, angering many students as the Junior Com-mon Room (JCR) claims it was not properly consulted.

An external Bar Manager has been appointed from the college of St. Hild and St. Bede, where they will now spend only half of their hours in or-der to oversee the running of the St. Cuthbert’s bar, reducing pressure on the bursar.

The Bar Steward position has also been removed from the JCR execu-tive committee, allegedly because of problems with the licensing agree-ment, something which members of the college refute.

Originally, the Bar Steward was an elected, sabbatical position, em-ployed by the University, but also a graduate of the college and a current member of the JCR.

The College office have said that the Bar Manager position has been introduced because of a decline in bar profits. However, members of the JCR have suggested that the figures for this are unreliable.

Students are angry with the lack of communication between the college office and the JCR.

The JCR was offered four options, none of which were suitable, but the employment of a Bar Manager was not rejected outright by the JCR.

However, the final decision was made by an interview process with-out student consultation.

Furhtermore, the JCR claims that emails were ignored and the College refused to provide them with the rel-evant and accurate financial data.

Gabriel Currie, Senior DSU Rep-resentative at St. Cuthbert’s Society, said: “People are really upset that col-

lege is failing to communicate with them at all - which is a major issue. I have tried to get data provided open-ly, but they are unwilling to do so.”

The figures that have been pro-vided by the College office were questioned by several members of the current bar staff who believe it is “difficult to see how we do not make a lot of money”.

However, some aspects of the bar are affecting its profitability. The lack of seating reduces the popularity of televised sports events, the cellar is the wrong temperature for storing beer effectively and the lines of the draught taps are so long that around 15 pints are wasted per week per tap as the bar is cleaned.

The JCR has suggested that reduc-ing the opening hours of the bar or training the staff in business skills would improve the profitability of the bar.

Removing the sabbatical element of the Bar Steward role has con-cerned many students who saw it as a great way to gain experience and improve their employability.

The choice for the Bar Manager has also been questioned due to his twofold role serving both St. Cuth-bert’s and St. Hild and St. Bede.

One student at St. Cuthbert’s com-mented that splitting time between colleges is not effective; “We know that this situation doesn’t work out because our bursar does a similar thing [balancing a role between the two colleges].

“The quality of time invested in St. Cuthbert’s has decreased since the merging of college positions a few years ago.”

The lack of response echoes the is-sues with the gas leak last year, once more highlighting problems with col-lege communication.

One student commented that “Cuth’s was such a community, but now there is so much politics and so much anger.”

Harriet Line

Cuth’s students angered by change in bar management

Students of St. Cuthbert’s Society have expressed frustration over a lack of communication between the college and the JCR Photograph: Gabriel Currie

Durham University Registrar and Secretary Carolyn Fowler wrote a controversial blog post, which has since been removed, commenting critically on her professional rela-tionship with the University Vice Chancellor, Professor Christopher Higgins.

In the post made on her blog, dur-hamregistrar.wordpress.com, Ms Fowler likened herself to Kermit the frog and Professor Higgins to Miss Piggy, both characters from the Mup-pets.

As a comparison to the Vice Chan-cellor, Ms Fowler wrote: “Piggy, se-cure in her stardom and suffering not

a moment of self-doubt, performs with single-minded determination regardless of whatever chaos might be going on around her.”

In contrast, she wrote of herself: “Meanwhile the registrar – Kermit desperately tries to keep Piggy and everyone else happy at the same time, his only fixed point of knowl-edge that the show must go on.”

An excerpt from the post is still available on Times Higher Education.

In her position as Registrar Ms Fowler acts as University Chief Op-erating Officer responsible to Prof Higgins.

However, she is currently on leave.After posting her blog, Ms Fowler

was challenged on Twitter for her audacity, tweeting in response: “The boss thought it was funny!”

The blog is controlled by Ms Fowler and the post has since been deleted.

Ms Fowler, the University’s first fe-male registrar, has occupied the posi-tion since April 2009.

She is also a former Durham Uni-versity student, having been one of the earliest female graduates from University College in 1990.

NewsPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012 7


Julia Chapman

Durham University’s Oriental Mu-seum continues to bounce back from its recent break-in. Opening to the public on June 16th, the museum has united local sixth-form pupils and University students with its ‘Made in China: Exports and Experiences’ exhibition.

Designed and curated by the teenagers and their University coun-terparts, the display explores the relations between Britain and China from 1500 up to the present day.

As part of the year-long project, the students have conducted exten-sive research in several areas, in-cluding exploration of the Chinese collection at the Oriental Museum, examination of the material found during archaeological excavations in Durham City (now housed in the Old Fulling Mill Museum of Archaeol-ogy), and an assessment of the Pal-ace Green Library archives relating to the field.

The students also conducted in-terviews with the local Chinese com-munity to gather their memories, and so produce an interesting and diverse exhibition.

The exhibition is part of the Cul-tural Olympiad for London 2012, and forms a segment of the ‘Stories of the World’ project, which invites young people aged 14-25 into muse-ums and art galleries to reinterpret their collections in new and inspiring ways, with the aim of living up to the London 2012 motto – ‘Inspire a Gen-eration’ – in all aspects of life.

The Oriental Museum has joined forces with Tyne and Wear and Mid-dleborough museums to discover and promote the collections of the north-east.

A large range of objects are fea-tured, including an English bishop’s chopstick holder, early European maps of China, and Olympic mascots. The students have enjoyed creating the exhibition, putting in hours of work during evenings and weekends for over a year.

Alex Green 18, a project team member from Gilesgate Sixth Form Centre said, “I have always had an in-terest in history. Doing Stories of the World has broadened my knowledge of a history I never knew.

“This project has opened doors for me and shown me new ways of exploring history. I have also built up my team-working skills and in-creased my self-confidence. I have made new friends locally and from all over the world.”

Heather Lawton 17, also from Gilesgate Sixth Form Centre, said, “Every session has been fun, inter-esting and I’ve learnt some amazing things that most people will never experience. Everyone’s really wel-coming and it makes Stories of the World a really fun experience.”

The Oriental Museum, situated on Elvet Hill, is open from 10am to 5pm Monday to Friday, and noon to 5pm at weekends, with entry be-ing free for students and £1.50 for adults. Phone 0191 334 5694, or visit ww.w.durham.ac.uk/oriental.museum for more details.

James Ablett

Oriental Museum launches new exhibition

Local sixth-form students have been working with the university to create a new exhibition entitled ‘Made in China: Exports and Experiences’. Photograph: Nicoletta Asciuto

This is the last time that I will grace the column of this paper as the DUCK Officer, and is therefore your final bulletin from DUCK this year. This has been a phenomenal year for DUCK and has seen thousands of you taking part in central events (1,357 at last count) as well as many more who have attended events, spon-sored a friend or just chucked their last precious pennies into a bucket.

This year has been one of great success for Durham students. We dominated Tough Guy with the larg-est team at the entire event. We’ve had teams of Jailbreakers getting as far as Kuala Lumphur without spending a penny. We’ve tipped 15,000 rubber ducks off Elvet Bridge and even spent a night in Durham Cathedral. We’ve had incredible peo-ple doing outstanding things, raising

huge amounts for charity. Specifically in fact, we gave away

£421,034.27 to charity this year which is a phenomenal amount. If you split this figure up it comes out at £25.51 per person in the University which shows just how generous you guys can be.

Thanks have to go to everyone; it’s entirely a team effort. However, a special shout out to the DUCK team who have been working tirelessly to pull it all together this year. How-ever, before we dwell on the fact that they’ve been running events with hundreds of participants, managing huge budgets and generally hav-ing an epic time I have to tell you that we are recruiting for next year. We’re looking for the brightest, most passionate and innovative students to run the team next year. No expe-rience required, just enthusiasm. Interested? You should be. Email carmen.o’[email protected] to get involved.

Archie Dallas

DUCK Officer’s Column Registrar criticises Vice Chancellor in ‘Muppet’ blog

PFor more news, visit palatinate.org.uk

8www.palatinate.org.uk


It’s with a sense of great honour, serving as your president, that I reluctantly write my final column in our student newspaper. I would like to outline some of our achieve-ments over the past twelve months, which I am proud to say have been numerous.

Some highlights include high election turnouts, the upcoming Dunelm House refurbishment, the launch of Question Time with the Vice Chancellor, 30 new student so-cieties, over 12,000 students trans-ported by the Nightbus, £641,000 raised by DSU charities and the launch of the new DSU website.

I will not apologise for allow-ing some local and national issues to slip through the net and that is because I am proud to say that we have prioritised restructuring the Union, guaranteeing that students are at the heart of the system.

This year I have tried to ensure the Union is looking beyond one term ahead, beyond twelve months and rather three years into the fu-ture. This Union is more than one sabbatical or staff team, more than one set of finalists and more than one cycle of students. This is a Un-ion that has seen hundreds of thou-sands of students pass through as members and will continue to do so for centuries to come. DSU looks to a future where DSU leads on the national scene in 2015.

DSU President’s columnMike King

Durham experts aid NASA in space X-ray research

Durham University experts are play-ing a major role in the NASA-led mission to determine the source of X-rays radiating from the cosmos, in order to improve the understanding of the growth of black holes.

On June 13th, the $170 million NuSTAR observatory satellite was launched into orbit, which operates through its sensitivity to high-ener-gy X-ray photons. The satellite will investigate the origin of the X-ray background.

The deepest component of the X-ray background project is coordi-nated by Professor David Alexander, from Durham University’s Depart-ment of Physics. NuSTAR’s key com-ponents are its mirrors, which have a special coating designed to focus high-energy X-ray photons from space accurately.

This technological advance is ex-pected to answer a question that has puzzled scientists since 1962. Prof Alexander commented, “The X-ray background is made up of X-rays that reach the Earth from all direc-tions within the cosmos.

“Despite being first discovered 50 years ago, astronomers are still not entirely sure what produces this cosmic X-ray ‘noise’, with possible candidates ranging from growing black holes to yet undiscovered ‘ex-otic’ objects.”

The satellite has a number of oth-er goals. NuSTAR will also study the remnants of supernovae (stars that have exploded) within our galaxy. Galaxy clusters will also be investi-gated, which are some of the largest structures in the known Universe. It is believed that dark matter holds them together, a mysterious sub-stance which is believed to make up 85% of the matter in the universe.

Dr James Mullaney, a researcher at Durham University, analogised the value of NuSTAR, saying “It is as though we were previously trying to read a book without our glasses. You can see that there is text but can’t make out the individual letters. Currently we can only make out 2 per cent of this ‘cosmic text’. With NuSTAR, we will be able to make out the majority of the story, dramati-cally improving our understanding of black-hole growth and the history of the high-energy Universe.”

The satellite lifted off from Kwa-jalein Atoll in the Marshall Islands over a week ago in an Orbital Sci-ences Pegasus XL launch vehicle. Currently orbiting the Earth at an altitude of 550 kilometres, it is scheduled to deploy its 10-metre mast this week, in order to begin utilising its unique X-ray focusing capabilities.

Larry Bartleet

The Office of the Independent Adju-dicator (OIA) has released a report that acknowledges a substantial in-crease in the number of complaints received from students with regards to plagiarism punishment.

The OIA, established in 2005, is an independent assessment body and can intervene with student is-sues, should a university’s internal measures fail to resolve them. Over the past year, it has become appar-ent that some universities are failing to correctly inform students about the consequences of plagiarism be-fore an offence is committed. CEO Rob Behrans explains that whilst plagiarism is an academic miscon-duct, students either were unaware they were committing an offence, felt their punishment was too harsh or their university failed to allow the student to defend their actions in a fair and plausible hearing.Palatinate spoke about the issue

with students and found that for Arts students especially, there is an element of uncertainty with regards to how much can be lifted from al-ternative sources, although every student interviewed was aware that the University does not tolerate pla-giarism.

“It is easy to plagiarise accidently, by failing to reference or incorrectly framing a quote,” said a Politics stu-dent, “and it is harder, especially in my subject, where we often need to reference new media, such as Twit-ter or online blogs. There are lim-ited guidelines on how to correctly cite such sources, and this could be considered a breach of conduct. It is hard to say where the line between right citations and plagiarism lies.”

Another English student sum-marised her experiences with pla-

giarism: “If you asked me what the exact rules were, I couldn’t tell you. I’ve just continued with what I was taught at A-Level and GCSE: if you use someone else’s idea, you should say so and you cannot just copy and paste without acknowledging the source. Anything that is not my own work I would consider plagiarism, but then how far does this go? Is lift-ing a three-word phrase an issue? I think part of plagiarism is down to the presentation of ideas and how concepts are phrased, but I’m not sure if this is exactly what the uni-versity says.”

Plagiarism detection software is also to be considered, as pro-grammes such as TurnItIn are en-couraged to allow for automatic de-tection of unoriginal work. Durham students generally considered it to be effective: “I think it does its job, but I know that only some subject areas use it, so it is hard to be exact. Plus, formative work is not always assessed in this way, and therefore could be overlooked when it comes to summative work which directly affects academic grades, and con-sequences of this would be consid-ered more severe.”

Behrans believes that universi-ties should reinforce their policies on plagiarism, and explain what is acceptable, what can be cited as a source and what breaks the rules entirely. He warns that if universi-ties fail to explain their protocol ful-ly, assumptions could be incorrectly made, and problems could be met.

Liam Burns, President of the NUS also explained his concerns: “I also worry some academics are reluc-tant to stir up cases of minor pla-giarism in a student’s first year be-cause they worry the repercussions might be severe, but if plagiarism goes unchecked early on, come the final year, a student can be in really hot water.”

Emma Francombe

OIA acknowledges plagiarism policy issues in UK universities

News

Graduation SpecialPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012


So long, class of 2012

Durham alumni are amongst the most successful in the UK. You only have to look at

the many leaders in every walk of life who have graduated from this University: in business, in the forces, in politics, in the church, in sport, in academia, in music and theatre, as entrepreneurs, and in charitable and voluntary activities.

Durham is rated 15th in the world for the desirability of its graduates by global ‘blue chip’ employers. We like to think one reason for this is the dis-tinctive, rounded education you get in our Departments and Colleges: not just academic excellence but gaining transferable life skills through the

opportunity to participate in and lead activities such as music and the arts, student leadership, sport, vol-unteering and fundraising.

The cohort of students graduat-ing this year are no exception, from amongst whom you have picked a handful but could have picked hun-dreds with equally exceptional cre-dentials.

On behalf of your University I wish you every success in your fu-ture. Although of course you are not leaving us, but when you graduate you are becoming part of the world-wide family of Durham alumni.

I arrived at Durham on the train and dragged my suitcase to Hild Bede. I made lots of friends,

joined a few societies and went to a couple of formals. Now, like you, I am trying to work out how ‘University life’ rapidly flashed by!

With short terms and more events in college, DSU and the Viaduct than one could possibly attend it’s easy to

allow three/four years at Durham to merge into one blissful mess and so my parting advice would be to buy a yearbook and fill it with stories, mes-sages and photos from your time at our small city in the North East of England.

You are blessed with friends, memories and a degree that will set you up to achieve in any walk of life that you choose; public or private, home or abroad. You are unique, you are gifted and you will be suc-cessful if you surround yourself with positive, loving and caring people, re-membering that success is not only based on your bank balance. Good bye and good luck!

As this year’s finalist cohort ventures out into the big wide world, we highlight a selection of ones to watch for the future and catch up with some recent leavers

A sunbaked post-exam celebration in leafy Durham is undoubtedly one of the most cherished memories for those graduating Photograph: Mat Ladley

Goodbye and good luck, from the DSU President and Vice-Chancellor

Professor Chris Higgins Vice-Chancellor

Mike KingDSU President

“On behalf of your University I wish you every success in your future”

9



Klute announces plans

Celebrating the Durham Difference: top graduates of past and present

Mike Ward on the field for DURFC Photograph: Elis Wilkins

Name: Mike WardCollege: StephensonDegree: Business

A former England Under 16 player, Mike moved from Bath Rugby Club to study Business at Durham.

He has played for the 1st XV throughout his time at university, on occasion captaining the side to victo-ries in the 2011 BUCS championship and in both the 2011 and 2012 Sev-ens championships.

He has also gained experience as an international, playing for England Students in his first and final years.

He has signed a professional con-tract with Leeds, where he will be able to put his substantial rugby ex-perience to excellent use.

Name: Adele PopeCollege: Hild BedeDegree: Natural Sciences

Adele has overcome the trau-ma of suffering severe burns as a child to become extremely suc-cessful and prominent on the Dur-ham theatre scene.

She has taken on lead roles both in Durham and on tour at the Edinburgh Fringe, starring in productions such as ‘Copacabana’ and ‘The Hot Mikado’.

Last year she released a char-ity single with the Eden Voices in aid of the Katie Piper foundation, a charity which helps those living with bodily disfigurements.

Adele’s commitment to follow-ing her dream of working in musi-cal theatre and her tireless advo-cacy of charity are both admirable and earn her her a place in our list of top Durham graduates.

Name: Jon ZhuCollege: StephensonDegree: Accounting and Finance

During his time at Durham Jon has been an integral part of JCR politics in his college, turning Stephenson JCR into a debt-free and financially healthy organisation.

Beyond this, he has doubled the membership of Durham Univer-sity Consulting Society, and insti-gated their innovative Outreach Programme, working with local busi-nesses to improve their perform-ance.

He has secured a competitive role as an investment banking analyst with HSBC, a testament to his hard work, dedication and financial skill.

Name: Joe LeatherCollege: UniversityDegree: Law

Joe’s contributions to Durham Student theatre have enabled much of its recent success. As well as tak-ing on Exec positions such as Social Secretary for DST and President of DULOG, he has taken on lead roles in university productions including Martin Sherman’s ‘Bent,’ and ‘Rent’, in which he played Angel.

He has been a leading member of the Durham University Improvised Musical Group for the past three years and has represented Durham at the Edinburgh Fringe Festival in musical theatre productions.

This year he reached the final round of applications for the prestig-ious drama school LAMDA, and after graduating will be moving to London to pursue a career in theatre.

Name: Sarah PetersCollege: Hild BedeDegree: Combined Arts

Sarah has taken on a prominent and important role in the manage-ment of Durham Student Theatre during her time at university.

She is the current president of DST, the first woman to take on the role, and has been involved in 50 separate productions, in adminis-

trative and creative capacities. Since starting up a production

company with her sister at the age of 15, she has produced and direct-ed numerous plays. and is currently preparing for a national tour with a reworked version of Shakespeare’s ‘A Midsummer Night’s Dream’.

As a president she has changed the face of theatre in Durham, abol-ishing the unpopular and expensive hire fees on the Assembly Rooms.

Name: Carmen O’Loughlin College: Treveleyan

Degree: History

Carmen has been a solid mem-ber of DUCK throughout her time in Durham. In her second year she was the Trevs DUCK rep raising over £11,000 in the college.

However, it has been in her role as DUCK Community Outreach Officer that she has really excelled. She fought hard to organise the Sleep Out in Durham Cathedral for the first time ever. Working single handedly, she managed to persuade the Cathedral to let 400 students and non-students spend a night sleeping rough for the homeless charity, Moving On Durham. The event was an enor-mous success and raised around £13,000 in the end.

Finally, Carmen is staying on to be the DUCK Officer and will lead the DUCK team to even greater success.

Carmen organised last term’s ‘Sleep Out’ in the Cathedral which raised £13,000 for charity Photograph: Quin Murray

Adele had to overcome great adversity to achieve success

Graduation Special

Name: Thomas WhitworthCollege: GreyCourse: Earth Sciences

Thomas has played University Hockey for the first team for the past two years, dedicating a huge amount of time to the club and tak-ing on the roles of Vice Club Captain and Publicity Officer.

On top of this, he has demonstrat-ed considerable skill in video edit-ing, producing promotional videos for the hockey and lacrosse clubs.

Thomas is currently employed by a Consett gym making videos to promote both the gym itself and the athletes who train there, including a recent video for the Make a Wish Foundation.

PALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012


Celebrating the Durham Difference: top graduates of past and presentWhere are they now?

Palatinate has tracked down

some of our hotly tipped graduates

from previous years to find out

what they’re up to now

Name: Briony ChappellCollege: CollingwoodDegree: English Literature

Briony has been involved with charity fashion shows throughout her time at Durham, coordinating events that in total have raised over £13,200.

Most recently she co-ordinated the Durham University Charity Fashion Show, held in a marquee on Palace Green. The event raised over £10,000 for the Teenage Cancer Trust and earned Briony and her team a nomination for DUCK’s Best Fundraising team award.

Briony’s talent for event man-agement and dedication to char-ity fundraising mean that she is a more than worthy of inclusion in Durham’s top graduates.

Name: Quinton MurrayCollege: CollingwoodDegree: Psychology

A worthy recipient of the most nominations, Quin has involved him-self in a huge variety of aspects of Durham life.

He is rarely seen without his cam-era, and has taken publicity photos for a wide variety of Durham clubs and societies. He is also a keen ex-plorer, having participated in two DUCK expeditions and cycling from Canada to Mexico at the end of his first year.

This year as DUCK Challenges Of-ficer he has taken on the mantle of organisation, planning the DUCK skydive, the bungee jump on Palace Green and the Toughguy team.

Already the photographer in resi-dence for the Royal Geographical Society, he is currently the artistic director for the up-and-coming Lon-don fashion label ‘Olivia Tarpey’, a project which will no doubt find suc-cess in his capable hands.

Name: Daniel Johnson College: UniversityDegree: History

Throughout his time at Durham Dan has been a successful and pro-lific student journalist.

As Palatinate News Editor he broke stories, such as the impris-onment of Iranian student Ehsan Abdoh-Tabrizi, the Wikileaks scandal and 38-week lets.

He acted as Editor-in-Chief be-tween March and December 2011, overseeing a major reorganisation and revamping of the newspaper.

He has been accepted onto the extremely competitive Telegraph journalist trainee programme, one of only five successful applicants out of several thousand, despite not pos-sessing a Masters in journalism.

Tom Brown (grad. 2010)

What have you been doing since you left Durham?

From the age of 10 I wanted to work for the BBC - and after leaving Durham I went on to fulfill that dream. I did a post-graduate diploma in Broadcast Journalism at Cardiff University, before spending two months in Paris on an internship with Eurosport. I then got a job at BBC East Midlands Today in Nottingham where I do anything from reporting in the field to presenting from the studio. A dream first job.

What are your main memories of being at uni in Durham?

College life. Being surrounded by your friends, taking on rival colleges in anything from hockey to mixed netball, and going clubbing in the same room you eat your breakfast. And not realising how lucky we are until you get out of Durham and find-ing out no one else had a college experience like ours.

What are your plans for the next couple of years?

I want to carry on working at the BBC - hopefully eventually at a national level. Gary Lineker’s got to give up that Match of the Day sofa at some point...

Ben Starr (grad. 2010)


I’ve been studying at the London Academy of Music and Dramatic Arts (LAMDA). I (finally) gradu-ate in July.


Durham has a brilliant theatre scene that I don’t think enough people are aware of. I have come across quite a few successful actors working at a high level in London and abroad who all had their start in DST. It is fantastic for building amazing friendships but also potential professional contacts in the arts world that extend beyond university. I also remember Library fines... and Planet of Sound.


Hopefully make a (successful) living as an actor. As a result of my training at LAMDA and Dur-ham I have been lucky enough to sign with a fantastic London agent, and while I am complete-ly aware of how perilous this career can be, I have been given a great platform from which to start.

Rajvir Rai (grad. 2010)


Since I left Durham I have com-pleted a Masters in newspaper journalism at City University, been a freelance football re-porter at the Telegraph and I’m now a trainee journalist at the Daily Mail.


My memories of Durham include sweaty nights at Loveshack, 1am pizzas editing Palatinate and general fun and games for three years.


My immediate aim is to estab-lish myself at the Daily Mail and continue to develop and refine my craft. I would also love to win the SJA (Sports Journalists’ Association) Young Writer of the Year award. I’m only 23 so I’ve got five years to do it!

James Birch (grad. 2011)


Since I left Durham I have taken a gap year to travel to the rugby world cup, Australia, Fiji, America and to take one big shot at my racing as last season I took a sabbatical to concentrate on my final year studies.


I have so many great memo-ries of Durham, from taking a inflatable car down the river to simple things like not being able to go into Tesco unless you were willing to commit half an hour to social encounters. In a weird way I even miss going to lectures! Just having all your best friends constantly around you is great.


This year I am competing in the Porsche GT3 Cup Challenge GB. I have currently won 3 races out of four and lead the cham-pionship. My ambition next year would be to compete in the Porsche Carrera Cup GB, to which my current series acts as a feeder, with a view to develop-ing a career in Le Mans and GT sport cars in general.

Meanwhile I unfortunately have had to be realistic and have potentially joined the rat race with Accenture, beginning in September. However I’m hoping I dont have to grow up too soon and can still drive for a living as long as possible!

Rob Malaney (grad. 2011)


I‘m currently studying a History Affiliate Degree at Cambridge and have just finished my first of two years. I played in this year’s Varsity Match at Twickenham and have since been elected as the Cambridge 1st XV captain. I also played for the Barbarians in May.


I had an incredible time at Durham - it was easily the best 4 years of my life. The rugby club had a massive contribution to that, especially our success last year, and I’d like to think I’ve made some lifelong friends. Other than rugby the other memory that is predominant would be the trek it up the hill to the politics department, which is one thing I don’t miss so much.


Over the next few years I’ll finish studying and eventually (hope-fully) get a job in law.

11

Quin Murray

Graduation Special

Graduation Special compiled by Olivia Rudgard. Our selected graduates were all nominated by members of the student body.Thomas Whitworth

Bu

siness

Business Editor: Jon [email protected]

@PalatinateUK

Palatinate - Durham’s Official StudentNewspaper




Spain, the largest of the PIGS (Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain), has finally swallowed

its pride, squealed defeat and come on bended knee to the other mem-bers of the Eurozone. Its bailout is likely to be up to €100 billion (£80 billion) but is likely to be consider-ably more after two audits of its banks are completed this month.

Unlike the other PIGS, Spain’s problems are not caused by irre-sponsible government spending. In fact, the Spanish budget was bal-anced up until the crisis of 2008 and had enjoyed a growth rate of 3.7% per annum. Instead, its problems lie in the financial sector. The cheap loans enabled by the entrance into the Euro allowed banks to rapidly expand with a strong reliance on the property market. Cheap mortgages to the public and developers saw the development of a housing bub-ble with house prices rising by 44% between 2004 and 2008.

The inevitable explosion of this bubble, with many defaults on loans, has left Spanish banks with almost worthless assets in property, forc-ing mass amalgamations and takeo-vers of smaller banks by larger ones. Even the fourth largest bank, Ban-kia, had to be nationalised in order to safeguard savings and attempt to stabilise the sector.

Although the Spanish budget was relatively healthy, the necessity of huge borrowing to pump capital into the financial sector, which has amounted to over €50 billion, has left it with a large deficit. In their cur-rent state, Spanish banks struggle to raise capital at affordable prices, making government aid inevitable.

The problem is that even more money has had to be borrowed by the government to deal with the ef-fects of a severe recession and the worst unemployment rate in Eu-rope. It cannot afford to bail out its entire banking sector, which ana-lysts expect to cost around €180 to €350 billion.

The central difference of the Spanish bailout is that it will be focussed entirely on the financial centre with no constraints or obli-gations on the national budget. The Spanish Prime Minister, Mariano Rajoy, has insisted that the austerity measures taken by his government over the past five months have en-sured that there is no need for fur-ther austerity. In short, Spain wants to avoid the slaughterhouse, unlike

the other PIGS countries which have been forced to adopt strict austerity measures and obligations from both the Eurozone and the IMF. There is probably some sense to this as more measures on top of the existing ones would only exacerbate public hostil-ity and resistance, which has often been fierce.

The question is, how will it be bailed out? If it was able to gain the aid of the European Financial Sta-bility Facility (EFSF) and defaulted, then its loans from the private sec-tor would be paid as equally as the EFSF loans. But if it were to be bailed out by the new European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which is replac-ing the EFSF, then the ESM loans would be paid before the private sector loans if Spain were to de-fault. Although Spain is less likely to default than Greece, it will face the same issue of being unable to access the usual commercial loans, or only loans with very high interest, as it will be seen as too high a risk. This would of course slow its recovery at a time when its economy is set to re-tract by 1.7% anyway.

The negative effect of the Euro-zone crisis on Britain is not insig-nificant and the entry of Spain into this situation will only heighten the effects. Firstly, it will further restrict the mortgages for first time buyers with mortgages available only with a 20% deposit of the value of the

property they wish to buy. Banks will be more restricted as they have less money available to lend and are more cautious, therefore only lend-ing to those who do not pose a risk of non-repayment. Furthermore, Brit-ain is seen as a safe haven for capital with investors from the PIGS buying property in London, where property prices have risen by 5.1% while fall-ing in many parts of the country.

The Eurozone is our biggest trad-

ing partner with around 50% of both exports and imports. Adverse circumstances in Europe will have a large impact on British jobs. Re-duced trade from big economies such as Spain will require British firms to find cost saving solutions, which will inescapably involve a loss of jobs. It will also mean that there is less scope for growth and investment, so no new jobs either,

especially for younger people. An unhealthy Eurozone is certainly not within Britain’s interest.

Finally, contrary to popular fears, the Spanish-owned Santander, al-though downgraded by Moody, is in a stable condition. Its UK subsidiary is quite autonomous from its Span-ish parent and would only be able to channel money from the subsidi-ary through a large dividend, but only with permission from the FSA, which is unlikely. Even if it were to fail, the UK government would guar-antee up to £85,000 of savings for each customer through the FSCS.

The volatility of the markets re-quires confidence for the Euro to survive. Confidence in the Euro is tenuous primarily due to fears that Greece will default on its debts and leave the Eurozone. If this were to happen it would set a dangerous precedent which would make lend-ers to the Eurozone question the viability lending to it. It would also cause a further banking crisis due to the enormity of its loans to French banks of €41.4 billion, German of €15.9 billion and British of €9.4 bil-lion.

For the Euro to survive and for an-other financial crisis to be avoided, confidence must be engendered in the market. The solution to Spain’s problems can function if the current deal succeeds.

Spain finally admits Euro defeat

€100 billionSize of the Spanish bailout

Spain becomes the fourth eurozone member to seek financial assistance

Bankia, Spain’s 4th largest bank, recently asked for a € 19 billion bailout Photo: Jazamarripae

Matt WilliamsAnalysis

“Spain cannot afford to bail out its entire banking sector, which analysts expect to cost around €180 to €350 billion”

Business13


PALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012

As Mark Zuckerberg rang the NASDAQ bell on the 18th May 2012, the Facebook

Initial Public Offering (IPO) was set to be one of the most widely antici-pated and highest valued in Ameri-can history, with Facebook raising $16 billion by selling 15% of the company. However, the social net-work’s stock market debut was fairly muted.

The initial signs appeared posi-tive as shares rose by more than 10% after trading started. At the end of the first day, shares ended at $38.23, marginally higher than the initial pricing of $38. This pricing valued the company at $104 billion which meant that the social network site was worth similar or more than company giants such as Amazon and Disney.

It was anticipated that small in-vestors would ignite a rise in the share price. However, the result was far more modest. There was even reluctance among some investors to buy or sell at all. Oliver Pursche, a New York financial advisor, argued “we’re telling our investors to hold off.” This was because of the lim-ited understanding held by investors about the business. Victor Basta at Magister Advisor argued that Face-

book will need to have around $30 to 40 billion in revenues to justify its current valuation. He stated: “This is a tenfold increase over the revenues that it currently generates. The ques-tion is where [will this come] from?”

One of the most interesting as-pects of the IPO has been the valu-ation of Facebook. The value of the firm is linked to its number of users, which equates to around 13% of the world’s population, 900 million peo-

ple. Moreover, placing a value on the company raised doubts from some commentators over its ability to gen-erate profits as its revenues originate from streams such as advertising along with its ability to exploit new mobile technology. This is particular-ly stark because Facebook is worth

six times more than WPP, the world’s largest advertising business.

However, it is important to note that technical glitches hindered the success of the firm’s debut. There was a thirty minute delay at the start of trading, which was attributed to a high demand for the stock. Despite this, 82 million Facebook shares changed hands after thirty seconds of trading. High demand has been a feature of the IPO with 25% more shares being sold than planned, which is around 421 million shares overall.

Criticism over slow order confir-mations, suggestions that there were too many shares and that they were too expensive continued to domi-nate. Swiss bank UBS is allegedly looking to take legal action against NASDAQ OMX Group because of losses sustained by the bank. Specif-ics regarding the loss have alleged to be up to £350 million. The bank attempted to buy 1 million shares, but technological failures meant that the amount of stock purchased was higher than expected. There was also discontent with some Face-book investors who are attempting to launch legal proceedings against Mark Zuckerberg, claiming that the stock was overvalued and the Face-book founder protected his share by unloading some of his shares.

NASDAQ has been under huge pressure to compensate outraged

investors because of their response to the issues encountered before and during the flotation. NASDAQ created a $40m fund to compensate those affected. Although UBS’ losses appear large, it had not been con-firmed whether they have been re-covered through subsequent trades. The meagre $40m fund drew dis-taste from brokers and market mak-ers alike.

On Friday 8th June 2012, the share price closed at 29% lower than its original price at $27.10. To many, this has vindicated the view that the IPO was overvalued.

This was compounded by the relative success of recent IPOs such as LinkedIn’s whose original share price of $45 initially doubled and now trades at $100. However, like Facebook’s, not all IPOs see a long-term rise in share price, Groupon’s shares now trade at $12, compared to their original $20 flotation price. US-based global stockbroker, BTIG, provided some sage words by stat-ing “Valuing Facebook is more art than science at this stage of its de-velopment and the current state of both social and mobile advertising.” Clearly this is far more realistic.

The expectations of many may have been dashed, but it seems rea-sonable to suggest that it is simply too early to tell whether the IPO will be as successful as expected.

Has Facebook failed expectations?Alex BondCommentary

In years to come, when we reflect on the current European debt cri-sis, there should be no doubt in our minds as to the depth and perva-siveness of the crisis Europe faces.

So why is the Euro as a currency still relatively strong then? Well, stronger than one might expect giv-en the extent of the current woes of Europe at any rate. Greece’s exit from the Euro looks increasingly inevitable (if inevitability can in fact increase), and we would ex-pect this to be reflected in a drop in its value as traders flee the be-leaguered Euro for currencies with more stable futures.

Of the competing explanations of this observation, there is one in particular that seems sufficiently plausible. Imagine the Eurozone economies as the individual apples that make up a bowl of fruit. Re-moving the rotten Greek apple can only serve to increase the quality of the fruit as a whole.

If this metaphor is an accurate one, a strong currency for Europe seems the result of perfectly ra-tional economic thinking; traders on foreign exchange markets are essentially betting that the Euro-zone will no longer be burdened by having to give huge bailouts to a failing economy.

Chances are they’re right in thinking Greece will exit. But it may not be alone in doing so. Though it was portrayed as a vic-tory for European governance, the money used to recapitalize Spain’s banks last week simply amounts to an equivalent increase in Spanish sovereign debt.

Ironically, the last thing the Eu-rozone needs is a strong currency; devaluing the Euro would boost exports in an instant, generating some badly needed revenues. Un-fortunately, those countries that are struggling the most financially, i.e. Portugal, Italy, Ireland, Greece and Spain, have no way of inde-pendently devaluing their curren-cies.

In this respect, a Greek exit from the Euro may not be such a bad thing. Sure, there is scant prece-dent for such a move, but it is likely that the Euro will be devalued as a knee-jerk reaction to it. Investors know that the Eurozone is only as strong as its weakest member, and that the members of a common currency do not by necessity share a common fate.

A Greek exit will restore con-fidence in the idea that being fis-cally profligate as a government is self-defeating, and will reaffirm the consensus that countries cannot be bailed out indefinitely. This is why the Euro remains strong, and why the Eurozone may well ride out the storm.

Euro strength and ‘Grexit’

“At the end of the first day, shares ended at $38.23, marginally higher than the initial pricing of $38. This valued the company at $104 billion”

Justin Cash

Analysts believe trading losses from Nasdaq OMX Group’s mishandling of Facebook’s IPO are close to $200m Photo: diTii

Comm

ent

Comment Editors: Joe Adams andFlorence [email protected]

@PalatinateUK

Palatinate - Durham’s Official Student Newspaper




Debate: Was the Queen’s Jubilee a waste of money? In our current age of austerity, was the high cost of the Diamond Jubilee celebrations justifiable?

Can the expensive Jubilee celebrations be justified, or are they costly but essential for British unity? Photograph: Gary Knight

“Costs quickly escalate when practical matters are considered

”

YES:Florence Snead

Durham, like the rest of the UK, seems to have been over-come with Jubilee fever. The

Union Jack adorns everything from cheddar cheese packaging to paper plates and there has been a marked increase in Facebook statuses de-claring a love for all things royal.

The majority of us probably made the most of the long bank holiday weekend and a nationwide holiday which practically mandated drink-ing lots of Pimm’s, an activity which will always have my whole-hearted support.

However, after the feel-good haze of boats and bunting has dissipated, was the Diamond Jubilee – while undeniably a pleasant weekend off – money well-spent?

On the contrary, it is becoming increasingly evident that the enor-mous expense of the Jubilee will cost the taxpayer more than the govern-ment is currently willing to let on.

While we struggle through a double-dip recession, the drawn-out proceedings could easily have been curtailed to celebrate the Jubilee in a more modest but nonetheless positive manner. It is estimated that the extra bank holiday will cost the economy an approximate £1.2 bil-lion, a large price to pay for weekend of unerring patriotism.

In addition, the opportunity of the Jubilee to create employment was largely missed and the celebrations have even been accused of exploit-ing cheap labour.

This comes as the story emerges that unpaid workers who were bussed into London under the government’s Work Programme were left stranded and forced to sleep under London Bridge in the early hours of Sunday. As part of the programme these workers must

undertake work placements to maintain their benefits, yet instead of using money to provide them with paid work, the government has instead spent on excessive pageant-ry and parades.

I would not want to mislead people in giving the impression that the Jubilee celebrations were funded solely from the taxpayers’ pock-ets. Indeed, an approximate £10.5 million budget for the celebrations came directly from both individual and corporate sponsors and the artists who played in the Jubilee concert played for free.

However, this £10.5 million is but a small percentage of the overall costs of the Diamond Jubilee; there were many extra costs about which the government is conveniently re-maining very tight-lipped. The vast underlying costs certainly darken an initial impression of the Jubilee as an event which relied on the generosity of the affluent.

The issue of affluent sponsorship of the Jubilee highlights the fact that if these sponsors had not spent their money on the Jubilee, they could have given financial backing to much more worthwhile and sustainable causes.

Government cuts were arguably one of the reasons for last sum-mer’s rioting and with the memory of this still fresh in our minds, it is more justifiable for such sponsors to direct their money to the aid busi-nesses which suffered at the hands of rioters or to prevent this happen-ing again.

In the north London borough of Haringey, the youth services budget was cut by 75% after the council’s budget was slashed by £41 mil-lion. It is undeniable that the £10.5 million sponsorship could be put to good use in the restoration of at least some of these youth services, and this is just one example of how this money could be injected back into society.

Separate to the private sponsor-ship, the costs of the Jubilee quickly escalate when practical matters are

considered. The Greater London Au-thority budgeted £2 million for out-side screens, road closures, signage and other expenses and while to-wards this it will provide £100,000, the rest goes to the Department for Media, Culture and Sport.

In addition to practical issues, the Royal household was given an extra £1 million to cover the increased volume of administration and corre-spondence from the Jubilee, gained from taxpayers via the Sovereign Grant. It is worth noting that this amount is more than double the contribution made for the Golden Ju-bilee in 2002, which by comparison was a much smaller £450,000.

We can also take the Ministry of Defence (MoD) as a further example of the wasting of taxpayers’ money in the Jubilee. The MoD made a big contribution to the proceedings

through the provision of ships for the river flotilla, the RAF flyover and the 1,000 strong personnel in the processions. What is most telling about the contribution of the military is that they refused to disclose any cost estimates for their participation.

At a time when the armed forces have increasingly diminished resources at their disposal, their obligation to pump what little they have into the Jubilee is a veritable waste. Indeed, charities such as Help for Heroes exist because the govern-ment cannot provide the support and resources that military person-nel require for recovery.

It is therefore astonishing that instead of sending financial support in this direction, the government has used excessive amounts of money for a few days of pageantry. If the pomp and ceremony had been scaled down, the MoD could have used their fiscal resources for much more worthy causes, like rehabilita-tion and better job security for serv-ing members of the forces.

With all these factors considered, it becomes increasingly apparent that the Jubilee celebrations wasted an inordinate amount of money that could have been put to much better use.

With the public still caught up in patriotic fervour at present there are doubtless many who might disagree. However, give it a few months and once Britain has emerged from the euphoric haze of the Jubilee and Olympics, the state of our bank bal-ance will tell a very different story.

Durham alumnus Lloyd Wade-Jones discusses dyslexia

When I arrived at Durham I found the first two years challenging be-cause at school I had not developed good comprehension skills. Because I could not spell, the teachers at my school saw that as a blocker to teaching me more advanced comprehension which would have helped me when I got to university.

I was lucky that my Departmental Tutors were very supportive and helped me learn the skills most undergraduates come to university with. As I specialised in the second and third year I also found that the subjects which interested me the most also came with a higher requirement for background read-ing and with the support of DUSSD, I was able to use the non-medical helper allowances to get my reading list transferred onto audio tapes by

other students on my course.I believe I was also one of the first

students to complete their final year exams on a word processor that was set up for me in the Geography Department. I believe that without this support from DUSSD and my department I would not have gradu-ated.

When I left university I did have a fear that my dyslexia would hinder my career, so I looked for operation-al rather than office-based roles and ended up starting a career in retail working initially for Sainsbury’s on their graduate programme.

I quickly specialised in Logistics and Supply Chain feeling that this would offer a stimulating career. Since then I have worked with a number of multinational retail or-ganisations over the years in senior operational roles managing teams of over 700 people, and I now cur-rently work for Amazon within the UK Operational Team.

If I had started my career ten years earlier then my dyslexia would have hindered me more in the workplace but with the evolution of word processors and email systems I have always been able to use the tools available to compensate for the challenges of written communica-tion with dyslexia.

I have always worked for employ-

ers that understand the challenges that a dyslexic can have in the work-place and have never felt that it has hindered my progression within an organisation. I don’t believe that my personal experience is unusual - all employers have a legal obligation to make allowances, but progres-sive organizations such as Amazon focus on your individual skills and contribution that you bring to the workplace and that drives your career progression rather than that of any other factors.

My own anxiety has been more of a hindrance to me over the early years of my career where I felt self-conscious about my dyslexia and it is only in the last five years that I have been able to move away from this and focus on my successes.

The challenge for a dyslexic student graduating now in my view is to have the self-confidence to ignore their disability as it is unlikely to hinder them in the workplace. Ensure that you discuss it dur-ing any interview process with an employer but don’t perceive this as a negative discussion; it just enables your potential employer to make the right allowances for every individual in the workplace.

CommentPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012 15


Can the expensive Jubilee celebrations be justified, or are they costly but essential for British unity? Photograph: Gary Knight

NO:Catherine Malpass

The Diamond Jubilee celebra-tions have become a conten-tious talking point, particu-

larly in the light of the recent extra bank holiday. This allowed some Britons to enjoy a long weekend, spend some time with their friends and family, and watch the flotilla and live concert in London. However, amongst such jovialities, there is al-ways cynicism close by - celebration of national pride has come under scrutiny in the current economic climate.

Indeed, recent times have been tough. With more people out of work, spending power reduced by lower wages and inflation creep-ing above the government target, everyone has had to tighten their belts. However, some estimates sur-rounding the economic effects of the Diamond Jubilee have been blown out of proportion. They would have us believe that the monarchy are responsible for plunging us deeper into an inescapable economic downturn, just so they can have a bit of a jig to Paul McCartney outside Buckingham Palace.

This is clearly not the case. Admit-tedly, some businesses may suffer at the loss of a working day and workers may feel the pinch at the loss of a day’s pay. However, most

of this money can and will be made up in the subsequent days. A service needed over the bank holiday will still be needed after it; hours not worked over the holiday can be worked at a later date.

Moreover, while some sectors may lose business at the hands of the extra bank holiday, some sectors, particularly that of retail, will pick this back up. Let us take the example of the Royal Wedding. It is estimated that this celebration boosted retail sales by around £515-620 billion. Some predictions have suggested that the Jubilee will follow a similar trend, in which the loss of output from the workplace will be offset by consumer spending figures.

Think food, alcohol and excess amounts of bunting - the conflation for any Jubilee party - and this con-sumerism is apparent. The Diamond Jubilee has given Britons a real reason to spend all in the name of patriotism or merely to copy Kate’s latest fashion trend.

Evaluating the Jubilee solely in terms of economical factors, and as a waste of money, is missing the social point. Yes, the economy is in a bad way at the moment, however, ignoring a traditional day of national pride and celebration could have been detrimental. Neither revoking celebrations nor curtailing them would instil confidence in the British public that their country has some form of economic control.

An estimated six million people sat down to The Big Lunch on 3rd June, that’s at least six million people who still have faith in their country

during these difficult times. Even for those who don’t support the mon-archy, the long weekend has at least given some people the time to spend with those who matter to them and to recuperate.

While the Jubilee beacons have been lit all over the world, there is also the resonance of the current Ol-ympic torch relay. Both events have caused some excellent PR for Britain. This subsequently has a positive impact on tourism and greater confidence in British business. Hotel bookings soared from 2-5th June in and around London due to the Jubilee, and estimates predicted that £10 billion was injected into the economy as a result.

Jubilee celebrations have also ex-tended across the Commonwealth. This worldwide publicity can only benefit the British economy and reputation. The Jubilee spectacles have been worthwhile in their posi-tive and unified portrayal of Britain as a nation.

Even for those who are not sup-porters of the monarchy, cast your mind back to last summer. Thou-sands took to the streets to riot, pre-dominantly to convey their distress amongst mass unemployment. The outcome however seemed futile. An estimated £100 million bill was placed on the tax payer. This makes any spending on the sixty year an-niversary celebrations seem much more justifiable.

In the Jubilee spectacles, money was spent to unite the British public under a positive wave, not in an at-tempt to repair and redeem the de-struction and discontent that placed added strain on the UK economy

during the riots. Current times are tough, yet they

have also been so for the Royal Fam-ily. They all put on brave faces when Prince Philip was rushed to hospital with a bladder infection. They are an example that austerity should not deter these acts of patriotism. Britain was right to unite under the Jubilee celebrations under the cur-rent economic climate.

Overall, the effects of the Jubilee weekend upon the economy are still very much unknown. Predictions have been at best tentative and loss

in some sectors could mean gain in others. The economy is certainly a delicate entity , however, sacrificing a day of national pride at the ex-pense of something so unpredictable would have been a great shame. It is these spectacles that will keep Brit-ain strong through these uncertain economic times.

Illustration: James Crosland-Mills

PTweet your reactions to @PalatiComment

Soapbox

Comment16



If you are coming to the end of your years at Durham, you’ve probably encountered what is

often touted as the ‘Durham Differ-ence’. A mainstay of the University’s marketing exercise, it is supposed to encompass all that is brilliant about Durham; a devilishly daring turn of phrase to describe this quaint old place.

A distaste for overly crude adver-tising aside – after all, it is the logical by-product of our modern university system – it might be worth seriously considering what this ‘Durham Dif-ference’, if anything, actually is.

First, let’s take the University’s definition. Admittedly, it’s a vague one. The Vice-Chancellor himself wrote in a pamphlet: “we all have an obligation to ensure it - whatever it is - continues to provide the inspira-tion and education which will pre-pare future generations of students.”

The ‘Durham Difference’ thus en-

capsulates the University’s academic prowess (a recent invitation to join the Russell Group was greeted with particular fanfare) as well as its ex-tra-curricular and cultural achieve-ments. Hence the obsession with promoting ‘Experience Durham’, the other pillar of the University’s mar-keting axis of evil.

Maybe that term is a bit cyni-cal: there is a much about Durham which makes it an excellent univer-sity, if not different in the way that Chris Higgins suggests. We can be proud of the fact that Durham is one of the highest achieving universities in the country.

A quick glance over recent univer-sity league tables neatly illustrates the point. We are the third best in the country according to the Sunday Times, and frequently sit at the sum-mit of the tables for subjects ranging from English to Physics.

But does this make us different? Arguably not. Instead, it makes us one of a small cohort of universi-ties seeking to unseat Oxford and Cambridge from their centuries of dominance. You could be forgiven for seeing ‘Durham Difference’ as a buzzword, little more than a vacu-

ous branding tool. One former Palatinate editor

wrote a couple of years ago that the Durham difference is “that we com-pete.” There may be some mileage in this. In 2011/12, over 6,000 stu-dents competed in college sport, in more than 5,000 fixtures. (Although there should really be a disclaimer if these college sport statistics include darts and pool).

Our competitive edge isn’t merely confined to sport. Durham’s debat-ers on Palace Green frequently reach

the final stages of international com-petitions, and DUCK seems to be one of the best in the country at taking other students’ money for forays for “expeditions” abroad.

Maybe then, the difference about Durham, and there’s not really an eloquent way of putting this, is that people just seem to do stuff. Things that don’t just revolve around their degrees. Things that are fun, fulfill-ing, character-building and CV-en-hancing in equal measure.

Students at other UK universities get involved in all kinds of things outside of their degrees. But Dur-ham students’ dedication to spend-ing enormous quantities of time in-volved in clubs or societies, often at the expense of academic work, has to be up there with the very best.

People seem to have turned get-ting involved in sport, theatre, mu-sic, or maybe even journalism into something which is at the least equal to academic work. I see no reason not to celebrate and embrace this as one of our defining characteristics.

For those who had college spirit firmly embedded in their veins way back in freshers’ week, fruitful ca-reers in JCR politics and bureaucracy

duly followed. For those who began to find the whole concept somewhat wearisome, there are a whole pleth-ora of societies whose ranks swell with college sceptics and flourish as a result. And then perhaps there are those fence-sitters, who enjoy a bit of both.

The key point is that while some of this may be facilitated by the Uni-versity, so much of it functions more effectively and successfully when it runs independently and autono-mously.

I’m almost certain that the Uni-versity Executive Committee will take little notice of this commonly-made plea. But it should begin to fathom that its attempts to monopo-lise and use for its own purposes the societies and colleges which do make Durham genuinely “different”, would be entirely self-defeating. If students are to truly ‘Experience the Durham Difference’, then it seems right that they find out what it is for them, and on their own.

What makes Durham ‘different’? Substantial engagement outside degree studies separates the University from the rest

Daniel Johnson

“The ‘Durham Difference’... pillar of the University’s marketing axis of evil ”

More than a year on, what has become of the Arab Spring?

Once the results of the first round of Egyptian Presidential elections were announced - the first time after millennia of civilisation that Egyptians have been able to vote for their head of state - it be-came clear that the two candidates to go through to the next round (to be held on 17th June) were to be Mo-hamed Mursi, the official Muslim Brotherhood candidate and Ahmed Shafik, a former Commander of the Egyptian Air Force and the last Prime Minister to be appointed by the ousted former Egyptian presi-dent, recently condemned to life im-prisonment for the deaths of protes-tors, Hosni Mubarak.

Initially the two favourites were both independents: Abdel Moneim Aboul Fotouh, a former member of the Muslim Brotherhood - expelled after breaking with the party line - and the former Secretary-General

of the Arab League and Foreign Min-ister under Mubarak, Amr Moussa, who went head-to-head in a tel-evised debate days before the elec-tion, managed to obtain only 17% and 11% respectively.

The decision of the Egyptian elec-torate (or more accurately 43% of the electorate – the turnout) result was immediately dubbed ‘the night-mare scenario’ by the intelligentsia. In addition, allegations have sur-faced that suggest 900,000 Egyp-tian soldiers were given ID cards so that they could vote for Ahmed Shafik, the preferred candidate of the Supreme Military Council which has been governing the country since the resignation of Mubarak 16 months ago.

Egyptians now have a choice be-tween an Islamist, whose colleagues elected in the parliamentary elec-tions have proven to be less com-petent than the long history of the Brotherhood’s public engagement might have suggested, and an ap-pointee of the former regime, sup-ported by the army, which continues to lose legitimacy and popularity.

Indeed, the hoped for Arab spring into a democratic future has become a hard slog for reformers across

the Middle East. Whilst Tunisia has managed to have successful elec-tions, Egyptian revolutionaries feel disillusioned, Libya is facing numer-ous problems in constructing a func-tioning state and depressing news stories of atrocious massacres com-mitted by Assad regime, desperate to hang on to power, emanate from Syria seemingly daily.

Tunisia’s success is certainly not insignificant; indeed, the Arab Spring started there; but the coun-try is small compared to Egypt, with Cairo seen as the centre of Arab political and philosophical thought. Indeed, it is not just the result of the election that is to be regretted;

Egypt still needs a new constitution. The next president will be elected under the old constitution and have the same powers that Mubarak had. Negotiations over the formation of a committee to decide upon the con-tents of the news constitution have stalled, with secularist voices claim-ing that the committee is dominated by Islamists, using it as an opportu-nity to strengthen their power.

Whilst the British and French-led intervention can be championed as a foreign policy success, Libya still has a mountain to climb before it can be described as a functioning democ-racy. Unlike Egypt, where, although fraudulent, elections had previously been held, Libya not only lacks the basic infrastructure for the electoral process, but corruption is also rife and militias still have arms, meaning that the state has no monopoly over the use of lethal force, undermining its authority. Kalipha Shakreen, a lecturer in economic and politics at Tripoli University, refuses to vote in the upcoming elections, as distinct political parties remain to be es-tablished, individuals do not know where to vote and constituency boundaries are not even clear.

Russia and China, not wanting to

be fooled twice, are refusing to allow Libya-like measures, such as a no-fly-zone, to be enacted over Syria, fearing that the West might use a UN Resolution sanctioning such under-takings as a cover for encouraging regime change and actively helping the rebel Free Syrian Army. Thus, the autocratic Assad government can carry on wiping out any opposi-tion.

A tragic situation indeed. How-ever, it must be remembered that in the last 18 months four Arab dicta-tors have been forced from office, free and fair, if not perfect, elections have been scheduled for the first time in three North African coun-tries and the threat of civil war or sectarian strife has been thus far avoided. If not a ‘dream scenario’, the region has thus far avoided the ‘nightmare scenario’ of a continued, across-the-board lack of democracy, conflict along religious lines, mili-tary coups or Islamist hijacks of the revolutions.

At time of printing it is believed that the Muslim Brotherhood can-didate Mohammed Mursi has won, with 52% of the vote. Official, final re-sults will be announced today, Thurs-day 21st June.

Welcome to the Arab SummerA year after the first events of the Arab Spring, the results of the national uprisings still seem ambiguous

“The spring has become a hard slog for reformers

”

Jack Stallworthy

PTweet your reactions to @PalatiComment

Durham University Rugby Club re-tained its National Sevens title at Broadstreet Rugby Club in the Mid-lands in early May.

The team swept aside UWE Hart-pury 49-14 in a relentlessly efficient performance to avenge, in part, the defeat they suffered at Twickenham in March.

The win caps off an amazing sea-son for DURFC 7s who also won the Jarrovian 7s and inaugural SKOFIC 7s.

In addition to this several Dur-ham students played for the ‘Pride, Passion, Party’ 7s team who were

surprise finalists of the highly-rated Kinsale 7s tournament.

Durham entered the tournament as favourites, having clinched the BUCS title with a last gasp win over UWIC in the final last year.

The squad contained familiar fac-es in playmaker and full Palatinate Mike Ward, Sam Rupar, David Haigh, Jack Pattinson and Harrison Collins. They were joined by freshers Charlie Gordon and Simon Hammersley as well as finalists James Lo and Leoni-das Morris.

Bruce Fulton was also included, having impressed head coach Alex Keay with his performances at col-lege level and in the Hill vs Bailey charity match.

The group stages were ominous for DURFC as they began with fairly straightforward wins over Manches-ter, Exeter and Brunel, which saw the team pitched against UWIC in the quarter final.

Despite the great results, the team suffered a significant setback as il-lustrious centre Tom Shiel sustained a horrific knee injury which abruptly ended his involvement in the tourna-ment.

The injury will see him miss the whole of next season, which brings a sad end to the England Students rep-resentative’s Durham career.

Durham, however, did not let this affect their game and produced strong wins against a feisty UWIC

and the rapidly improving Bishop Burton to reach the final.

It was at this point that the team were really beginning to hit their stride.

Ironically Durham were drawn against Hartpury for the second time this year in a national final.

With the memories of the heavy defeat at Twickenham still vivid in the minds of the Palatinates, a strong performance was required.

Durham began well, first stretch-ing the Hartpury defence, spinning it out wide before a half break by winger David Haigh saw Simon Hammersley find space to break the Hartpury line and score the first try of the match.

Hartpury scarcely had time to catch their breath before ruthless tackling resulted in a turnover and a try in the corner for Charlie Gordon.

Duncan Finnie profited from strong offloading from Harrison Col-lins and increased the score to 19-0.

Hartpury were on the back foot and Durham took full advantage as Haigh, unflustered by the onslaught

of Hartpury defenders, calmly grub-ber kicked the ball down field and, much to the delight of head coach Alex Keay, regathered the ball for Finnie to score his second try of the match.

Half time came and the Palatinates were firmly in the ascendancy with the score 26-0.

While Hartpury managed to get on the scoreboard with two well-worked second-half tries, scores from Haigh, Rupar and Pattinson en-sured a strong Durham victory as the champions ended the match 49-14.

Durham can be extremely pleased with the manner in which they won this title.

They not only showed the attack-ing flair that 7s demands but also composure and structure in defence.

Furthermore, six of the 11-man squad will be in Durham next year which looks promising for the 2012/2013 season, where Durham will aim to retain their title for an unprecedented third season in a row.

Sport

Sport Editors:William WarrSpencer Brown [email protected]

@PalatinateUK

Palatinate - Durham’s Official StudentNewspaper


>> Turn to page 18 and 19 to see Durham celebrate the Olympics

SportPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012 17


DURFC back on top Rugby club earn sweet revenge against Hartpury to retain National Sevens title

James Hallam

“With the memories of the heavy defeat at Twickenham still vivid, a strong performance was required” 35

DURFC’s victory margin over Hartpury in the final

Men’s Rugby

“Hartpury were on the back foot and Durham took full advantage”

Hartpury may have stopped the Palatinates at Twickenham, but Durham managed to get their revenge Photograph: DURFC

Sport18



How did you find carrying the torch, how did you enjoy it?

It was really really cool. Basically, I overslept this morning, and I got a call from the Samsung helper say-ing “Where are you?!” so I ran out of bed and it was all a bit of a blur for the first hour! They put us on a bus and showed us highlights from each day of the torchbearing so far, that was great and I had a bit of a cry! And then by the time you get out of the bus you’re just overwhelmed by peo-ple handing you their kids and asking you for pictures, it’s just an amazing feeling.

What route did you take?

We went through part of Sherburn for 300 metres, a slow run. I got passed on from a guy called Kieran and passed it onto a trampolinist with Cystic Fibrosis called Paul. I had a good chat to them.

And there were no slip-ups, drops or burnings?

This morning when I was running to get to the torch meeting point I twisted my ankle again (because I’ve already twisted it last week) so that was pretty bad and I was wondering how well I’d be able to run.

How was the support on the streets?

There were loads of people running alongside it which was pretty cool – the crowds as well as the helpers. There was plenty of support and my mates had a ‘Go Kira Go!’ ban-ner. They had all the pictures of my missing friends superimposed and held them up too, so everyone who couldn’t be there was there sort of! My grandmother also came from Sin-gapore so that was really nice.

And how is training and prepara-tion going at the moment?

Unfortunately I didn’t make the Ol-ympic team this time around, so I’m taking a bit of a break and I’ll prob-ably start up again around August. There are nationals in October which

I really want to do well in because it’s the first competition after the Olym-pics where everyone will be on form again. I’ve come second and third in that last year and the year before so it’ll be good to get first this year.

Has the buzz around the Olympics been what you’ve anticipated? Did you feel it when you were carrying the torch?

When I was carrying it not so much, but the build up to it where they show you highlights and things, it was very much a case of ‘Wow’. You get to meet all of the torchbearers as well. The other Durham student Naomi was on there as well so I got to speak to her.

Do you see it as a good advert for Durham and the North East gener-ally, the way the celebrations have gone up here?

It’s definitely helped promote the University because I had a couple of people ask me “are you that student from Durham?” and I was like “yes!” So obviously it’s gone well for them. I think it helps promote the area as well, it brings everyone together. There were loads of parties as well, on the sides of the streets, which I thought was really nice.

Kira Roberts ran her 300m torch stint in Sherburn, near Durham Photograph: Rupert Roberts

Q & A with Kira Roberts - elite fencer and one of the University’s three Olympic torch-bearers

Olympic fever: crowds flock to watch Olympic torchWith local celebrities, live music and talented young performers, Durham put on a true show to welcome the London 2012 Games to Durham

The miserable weather failed to extinguish the Olympic flame on its triumphant journey through Durham’s streets to the race-course, and the spirits of the com-munity at large that had gathered to welcome it remained equally defiant.

At just before 7pm on Saturday, the BBC’s Matt Baker carried the torch into the University cricket ground to be met by students and locals alike, who had thronged in their thousands to see the beacon lit on stage.

Baker, who hails from County Durham and had aspirations to be an Olympic gymnast in his youth, declared the moment to be “one of the high points” in his life so far, in a career which has seen him attain broadcasting fame from Blue Peter through to The One Show.

Earlier in the day the crowds had been roused by a stunning performance from The Gala Thea-tre Company’s junior stage school.

The story of the Olympics was displayed on a huge screen and ac-claimed local band Little Comets

provided further entertainment with their lively set evoking indie elements of Razorlight and The Futureheads.

Local gymnasts then demon-strated incredible strength and poise in a spectacular routine.

The commercial and corporate aspect of the Games made a slight-ly less welcome appearance, as official Olympic Games sponsors Samsung, Lloyds TSB and Coca-Cola pushed their products and brands in extremis.

But nevertheless the event served as testament to the pride and passion of the North East and this great city in particular.

It was also a celebration of the university, which places such an emphasis on its sport, and has en-

Tom Ryder

Olympic Torch event

“It’s definitely helped promote the University... and it helps promote the area as well”

“The event served as testament to the pride and passion of the North East and this great city in particular ”

Durham’s Steph Elliott with the torch Photograph: Rose Winter

Tom Ryder caught up with Kira after her stint with the torch

SportPALATINATE | Thursday 21st June 2012 19


Olympic fever: crowds flock to watch Olympic torchWith local celebrities, live music and talented young performers, Durham put on a true show to welcome the London 2012 Games to Durham

joyed another tremendous season of sporting success in the Olympic year.

University Vice-Chancellor Chris Higgins was keen to express his de-light at proceedings, and the way in which the ceremony acted as a showcase for the University and the city at large:

“It’s wonderful for Durham and for the University. It’s good public-ity, and of course Durham Univer-sity women are number one in the country for sport, and the Men are number two.”

The Vice-Chancellor also sang the praises of the university facili-ties as venues for the torch festivi-ties.

“Most of the celebrations are on University land. Here we are on the university cricket ground, which is probably the most beautiful cricket ground in the country with the ca-thedral and the castle in the back-ground.”

“And then we’re going up to the University’s Palace Green tomor-row morning with Paul Colling-wood. What more can you ask?”

As well as being an advert for the University and being immensely popular with students, the celebra-tions were well attended by local residents, many of whom brought their entire families along to wit-

ness the flame passing through.Helen Huitson and her daughter

Rebecca, who travelled from Bel-mont to spectate, championed the event as something which truly the brought the community together and united local residents and stu-

dents.Mrs Huitson said: “Durham has

become far more cosmopolitan of late and there is much more har-mony between locals and the stu-dents. This is emphasised today.

“This is the only time we’re go-ing to be able to see [the torch be-ing carried] so why not come down when it’s on our doorstep?”

Mrs Huitson also spoke of how the Olympics has “brought sport to the forefront” and will encourage

them to become more active as a family.

“We’ll be watching all of the events. We don’t usually do sport as a family, we just tend to go on walks and things like that. But the Olympics being held here will defi-nitely encourage us to get the ten-nis or badminton rackets out, if we ever get a summer!”

The torch’s journey paused at the racecourse overnight but continued its journey on Sunday, where it was helped along its way by three of Durham University’s finest athletes.

Kira Roberts (a Commonwealth gold medal winner in fencing), Naomi Hoogesteger (who holds the world record for rowing the Atlantic), and Steph Elliot (England under-21 hockey captain), all held the torch aloft in its route around the city and out towards Sherburn as it continues its tour of the UK.

There will be plenty of Palati-nate representation in the games themselves: five of the ten women rowers on the GB shortlist are from the University, with many more involved in the various organising committees.

Judging from the support and enthusiasm the torch’s arrival gen-erated, we are in for an unforgetta-ble summer of sport come July.

“There is much more harmony be-tween locals and the students. This is emphasised today ”

Local resident Helen Huitson

BBC’s Matt Baker lights the cauldronPhotograph: Nicoletta Asciuto

Illustration: James Crosland-Mills

From the 5th-8th June Durham Univer-sity Netball Club attempted to set the world record for the longest continu-ous netball match.

A brutal 72-hour marathon was completed, smashing the previous record by 12 hours.

Although a Guinness adjudicator was not present, evidence has been supplied and an official decision will be made in due course.

The idea was originally sprung from DUNC fundraising secretary Maxime Rowson in the summer of 2011 and throughout the year fig-ures across the club have put in a tre-mendous amount of effort to arrange an event of this magnitude.

Over the opening hours of the charity game the lead changed hands

regularly but by the first morning the ‘purple team’ had opened up what became an unassailable advantage of over 100 points.

Despite the best efforts of their black-dressed counterparts, the clos-est the two teams came after the opening 12 hours was 20 points and throughout the remaining 60 hours the purples continued to dominate.

However, the blacks were persist-ent and still gave a fantastic perform-ance.

Club Captain Katie Worthington spoke honestly of the true pain expe-rienced by the players.

She said: “We knew it would be hard but none of us knew exactly how bad it would be until we were already playing.”

A stringent rotation policy meant each player spent three and a half hours on the court, followed by two and a half hours off court.

But as more time passed the play-ers began to struggle; off court time was reduced further to just an hour.

Throughout the three-day match many of them managed just eight hours of shut-eye.

The Guinness Book of World Records stipulates that a maximum

of 12 players per squad can be used for an attempt to be considered valid, yet DUNC began with only 11, which was dramatically reduced as play continued.

Some periods of the game were played as 5-a-side.

Despite obvious pain and dis-comfort none of the players allowed themselves to be ruled out, demon-strating their incredible spirit and desire to play.

Worthington reported that the pressure on the feet was the most painful part of the match, empha-sized by a number of players don-ning slippers or bare feet as opposed to trainers.

To greet the end of the 72nd hour a huge crowd surrounded the court and celebrated this momentous oc-casion with the very relieved and ex-hausted players.

The final score read 3045-2824

to the purple team, but this was the least of the worries of the drained players as they shared this joyous moment together.

As well as surviving the gruelling 72 hours, an additional achievement was the funds raised for the chosen charities, Help for Heroes and Team Durham’s Zambia Aid project, which have passed halfway towards the £10,000 target.

How long this record will stand remains dependent on whether ru-mours of an iminent attempt from Birmingham University are true, but the magnitude of DUNC’s tremen-dous efforts should be remembered longer than any record can stand.

DUNC are still accepting dona-tions for their marathon efforts. You can donate to their charities by heading to: www.justgiving.com/ duncworldrecord


Sport Olympic torch comes to DurhamCity celebrates historic moment, p.18 & 19

DUNC smash record for longest match

DURFC retain Sevens titleDurham beat rivals Hartpury in final, p. 17

Pete Vickers

“We knew it would be hard, but none of us knew exactly how hard”Kate Worthington

Durham’s netball players endured a 72-hour marathon match for charity Photograph: DUNC

Interview with torch-bearerKira Roberts describes carrying the flame , p. 18

palatinate issue 741

Documents

hild bede alumni

hild bede equivalent

hild bede college library

hild bede src president

college libraries

compulsory library charge

better stocked library

education library