paper 8 - scottish fire and rescue service · paper 8 stc/report/closingreports page 6 of 15...
TRANSCRIPT
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 1 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Report To: SERVICE TRANSFORMATION COMMITTEE
Report Number: C/STC/18-14
Date: 11 SEPTEMBER 2014
Report By: DCO CLARK
Subject: SERVICE TRANSFORMATION PROGRAMME CLOSING REPORTS
1 PURPOSE
1.1 The purpose of this report is to inform the Service Transformation Committee (STC)
with an overview of the projects that closed during the period 12 April 2014 to 12
July.
2 RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 The STC is asked to consider the closing reports with a focus on the following areas:
The STC are content that these projects have sufficiently delivered to allow
them to close.
The four projects that closed delivered in line with the requirements of their
project dossier.
The projects intermediate benefits can be effectively measured.
3 KEY POINTS
3.1 Four projects came forward for closure at by the Service Transformation Programme
Board (STPB) August meeting. These projects have been relatively simple in terms of
complexity to measure their success. Evidence has been gathered against each
project to demonstrate their performance and it is pleasing to note we are confident
that all projects have successfully delivered to date. Copies of the closing reports can
be found in appendix A, with supporting evidence available on the sharepoint site at
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 2 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
https://firescotland.sharepoint.com/sites/PB/Closing%20Reports/Forms/AllItems.aspx
It is therefore requested that the STC confirm if they are content that the following
projects have been closed:
SA 1.1.1 New Approach to Community Safety (Development of national
community safety policies, procedures and supporting arrangements across
Scotland).
SA1.1.2 Fire Investigation (Development of 3 national teams based in the
East, West and North, realising £64023 of savings in staff costs
SA1.1.3 Business Regulation and Fire Engineering (Development national fire
safety enforcement policies, procedures and development of supporting
arrangements across Scotland).
SA4.4.3 Email Archiving (Provides the foundation to deliver a single SFRS by
providing an email archive functionality to aid the integration of the 8 legacy
services. It consists of a centralised SFRS backup solution resulting in the
continuing reduction of overall maintenance and aiding the reduction in the
number of separate teams/personnel carrying-out this function).
3.2 It is worth noting that the project dossiers for Prevention and Protection SA1.1.1 –
SA1.1.3 required the development and population of their departmental structures.
The projects have not realised this to date. As this was the only outstanding outputs
remaining for these projects and progress towards this is captured under SA 4.1.2
Implementing the Structure project it was considered that there was no benefit in
keeping these projects live.
3.3 In addition to the four projects closing there are a further seven that are completed
and are now in the process of gathering the evidence required to submit to the STPB
for approval to close at the next meeting in November:
SA 2.2.2 Branding
SA 4.2.3 Best Value Review of Occupational Health
SA 4.4.1 GIS/Gazetteer
SA 4.4.2 Business Intelligence Reporting
SA4.4.3 Application Platform
SA 4.4.7 Data and Secure Storage
SA 4.5.2 Finance System Phase 1
Prepared by Frank Clayton
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 3 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Service Transformation Programme Manager 28 August February 2014
Appendix A
Service Transformation Programme
Closing Project Report
Project: New Approach to Community Safety Engagement
Project Start Date: 01 April 2013
Project End Date: 30 March 2014
Project Manager GM Martin Millar
Project Manager
contact number
07770 823912
Date 21 April 2014
Please detail to what extent has the project delivered to Time, Cost and Quality
Deliver to time
Main objectives within scope of original project plan completed:
CSE Framework (Oct 2013) and Suite of core CSE Policies and Procedures (April 2014) introduced. National ambition for CSE (HFSV) agreed with Regional SDA’s based on qualitative approach, improved targeting of HFSV via increasing risk ratio objectives.
CSE policies
Additional Guidance and Thematic Plans established and introduced throughout 2013/14 (further introductions for 2014/15 expressed within P&P Action Plan) Thematic action plans
National, Regional and Local structures developed to support effective
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 4 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
community engagement capacity. Structures (Local) established to date subject to interdependency of strategic reviews of Support and Control Room staffing. Some LSO Area’s with resultant limiting of resources (CSA roles).
Training Needs Analysis for CSE completed. P&P Action Plan Objective to commence development of a competency framework during 2014/15.
Deliver to cost
Delivered within existing budgets.
Deliver to quality
National Frameworks, Policies and Procedures, following consultation and
production, approved by LSEC, SLT and/or SFRS Board prior to publication.
Please detail the project benefits and the performance measure that will be utilised to confirm to what extent they have been delivered.
Benefit
Cashable The reduction in staffing costs is not possible to quanitify accurately
due to the baseline assesment from which to measure from has
proved too onerous to confirm. The 8 antcedent services staffing
figures were difficult to quanitify due to the various staffing and duel
roles undertaken.
Non cashable Model for delivery of CSE activities introduced and functioning
across single SFRS.
Qualitative approach to HFSV ambitions, focusing on high risk
factors LSO targets agreed for 2014/15.
Please detail any realised dis-benefits or unintended negative consequences.
Dis-benefit
Cashable None
Non cashable Time-frame to reach end state structures (P&P) in Year 1 potentially
too ambitious when complicated by interdependency of supporting
projects.
Interdependencies with other projects
Project Interdependency Impact
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 5 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Support Staff Review Potential to provide capacity
for redeployment of
personnel into dedicated P&P
Roles (CSA) from existing
following review outcomes.
Review not yet published
(April 14) therefore ability
to populate P&P local
structures reduced
pending outcome.
Control Room Review Potential to provide capacity
for redeployment of
personnel into dedicated P&P
Roles (CSA) from existing
following review outcomes
Review not yet completed
therefore ability to
consider Ops Control
staff for redeployment not
viable at present.
Performance
Management
Framework
Strategic performance
management productions
availability
Performance monitoring
consistency and
appreciation of progress.
Lessons identified
Lesson
Appreciation of interdependent projects and shared impacts of such on project
outcomes.
Outstanding Project Risks (please highlight the position with any outstanding risks
associated with your project
Concern Mitigation Probability Impact
Achieving end state structures
(local staffing levels).
Continued
engagement with
POD(HR) to progress
3 3
Future projects (please highlight any potential future projects which need to be considered by the Service Transformation Programme Manager)
Title Intended product/benefit
N/A
Performance Measure (please confirm the performance indicators and method of data gathering to be used to measure the success of the project)
Performance indicator Method
SG Fire and Rescue Framework –
Secondary KPI HFSV/10,000 pop.
Improved ratio 33.4/10,000 pop. averaged
nationally (P&P MIS – CSET)
National, Regional and Local HFSV 70,000+ HFSV completed against a target of
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 6 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
- agreed targets 2013/14 65,700 (P&P MIS – CSET)
Dwelling house fires & casualties In line with the Framework KPI’s
Service Transformation Programme
Closing Project Report
Project: Prevention & Protection – Fire Investigation
Project Start Date: 1 January 2013
Project End Date: 31 March 2014
Project Manager AM Ross Haggart
Project Manager
contact number
07921985811
Date 29 April 2014
Please detail to what extent has the project delivered to Time, Cost and Quality
Deliver to time
The key aspects within the scope of the project have been delivered within the
necessary time, including:
National Fire Investigation Framework 2013 – 2016 has been embedded across Scotland;
Protocol for joint working with Police Scotland and Forensic Services – Scottish Police Authority in relation to Fire Investigation is in place;
Appropriate SFRS governing and procedural documents for Fire Investigation are in place across Scotland;
A Fire Investigation Learning and Development Framework has been developed for the SFRS. (Supporting documentation can be found on the SFRS intranet
http://sfrs.verseone.com/documents?media_folder=118&root_folder=Fire Investigation Fire Investigation documentation
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 7 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Structures to support the delivery of specialist Fire Investigation services have been developed to ensure this attribute is available on a pan-Scotland basis.
Deliver to cost
The project has been delivered within existing budgets, with the proposed structural
arrangements realising some cashable benefits for the SFRS.
Deliver to quality
The national Fire Investigation Framework, protocol, policy and procedures have
been published following appropriate approval. These documents ensure a
consistent and professional approach by the SFRS to the investigation of fires and
the subsequent reporting processes.
Please detail the project benefits and the performance measure that will be utilised to confirm to what extent they have been delivered.
Benefit
Cashable £60k. The duty system for FI teams will be reviewed to confirm the
most effective and efficient duty system to work.
Non cashable In addition to the cashable saving above, there are several non-
cashable benefits to the SFRS that have been realised by this
project. Firstly, more equitable access is available across Scotland
to specialist Fire Investigation Officers. Additionally, those officers
now assigned to Fire Investigation will be able to focus fully on this
discipline without having to work across different functional areas,
which will enable them to become expert within this field. Finally,
capacity has been created for supervisory and middle managers
who no longer have Fire Investigation as part of their areas of
responsibility.
Please detail any realised disbenefits or unintended negative consequences.
Disbenefit
Cashable None
Non cashable None
Interdependencies with other projects
Project Interdependency Impact
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 8 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Workforce planning Work is still on-going to fully
populate Fire Investigation
structures. This will have to
be balanced with other
structural imperatives within
the SFRS.
May take longer to fully
populate structures,
which may impact on
timing of cashable
benefits being realised.
Lessons identified
Lesson
When dealing with project such as this one that impact directly on personnel,
timescales to achieve key milestones may be more extended than anticipated.
Outstanding Project Risks (please highlight the position with any outstanding risks
associated with your project
Concern Mitigation Probability Impact
Staffing structures may not be fully
populated in early course.
Existing staffing
structures will be
maintained as
necessary.
2 2
Future projects (please highlight any potential future projects which need to be considered by the Service Transformation Programme Manager)
Title Intended product/benefit
None
Performance Measure (please confirm the performance indicators and method of data gathering to be used to measure the success of the project)
Performance indictor Method
SFRS indicators under development NA
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 9 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Service Transformation Programme
Closing Project Report
Project: Business Regulation Incorporating Fire Engineering
Project Start Date: 01 April 2013
Project End Date: 30 March 2014
Project Manager GM Jim Hymas
Project Manager
contact number
07824598521
Date 25 April 2014
Please detail to what extent has the project delivered to Time, Cost and Quality
Deliver to time
Main objectives within scope of original project plan completed:
National Fire safety Enforcement Framework 2013-2016 incorporating the single audit programme of high risk premises embedded across Scotland.
Suite of national FSE policies and procedures issued to support the FSE Framework ensuring a standardised and consistent approach.
Improved reputation with external partners, building control and building sector due to standardises approach delivered on a pan Scotland basis. (difficult to measure anecdotal evidence only)
National, Regional and Local structures developed to support effective FSE delivery. Local structures established to date subject to interdependency of strategic reviews of Admin and Control Room staffing. Some LSO Area’s with resultant limiting of resources (Auditing Officer roles).
Training Needs Analysis for FSE completed. P&P Action Plan Objective to commence development of a competency framework during 2014/15.
Performance management system and Quality Assurance process in place for monitoring and evaluating performance.
Deliver to cost
Delivered within existing budgets.
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 10 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Deliver to quality
National Frameworks, Policies and Procedures, following consultation and
production, scrutinised by LSEC, and approved by SLT and/or SFRS Board prior to
publication where appropriate.
Please detail the project benefits and the performance measure that will be utilised to confirm to what extent they have been delivered.
Benefit
Cashable Final cashable benefit not yet determined, P&P end state structures
not yet being achieved due to interdependent project outcomes.
Non cashable Standardised and consistent targeting of high risk premises
introduced across Scotland.
Please detail any realised disbenefits or unintended negative consequences.
Disbenefit
Cashable None.
Non cashable Time-frame to reach end state structures (P&P) in Year 1 potentially
too ambitious when complicated by interdependency of supporting
projects.
Interdependencies with other projects
Project Interdependency Impact
Support Staff Review Potential to provide capacity
for redeployment of
personnel into dedicated P&P
Roles (AO) from existing
roles following review
outcomes.
Review not yet published
(April 14) therefore ability
to populate P&P local
structures reduced
pending outcome.
Control Room Review Potential redeployment
opportunity for personnel into
dedicated P&P Roles (AO)
from existing roles following
review outcomes.
Review not yet completed
therefore ability to
consider Ops Control
staff for redeployment not
viable at present.
Performance
Management
Framework
Strategic performance
management productions
availability
Performance monitoring
consistency and
appreciation of progress.
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 11 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Lessons identified
Lesson
Appreciation of interdependent projects and shared impacts on project outcomes.
Outstanding Project Risks (please highlight the position with any outstanding risks
associated with your project
Concern Mitigation Probability Impact
Achieving end state structures
(local staffing levels).
Continued
engagement with
POD(HR) to progress
3 3
Future projects (please highlight any potential future projects which need to be considered by the Service Transformation Programme Manager)
Title Intended product/benefit
N/A
Performance Measure (please confirm the performance indicators and method of data gathering to be used to measure the success of the project)
Performance indictor Method
SG Fire and Rescue Framework –
Secondary KPI FSE.
Targeting audit of high risk premises
(P&P MIS Enforcement database).
National, Regional and Local FSE –
agreed audit targets 2013/14
10,000 audits to be completed in year 1 of
FSE Framework.
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 12 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Service Transformation Programme
Closing Project Report
Project: Email Archive SA.4.4.3
Project Start Date: 01/08/13
Project End Date: 31/03/14
Project Manager Paul Wright
Project Manager
contact number
01505 356681 – Project Support Office
Date 01/05/14
Please detail to what extent has the project delivered to Time, Cost and Quality
Deliver to time
The project has delivered Email Archiving solution to legacy D&G and Central users
as planned, with the remaining ex-services now scheduled as ICT business as usual
(BAU). The project is dependent on the AD Migration project. As soon as each
legacy Service is migrated onto the single SFRS Active Directory, the email archive
solution can be implemented – anticipated to be the end of the 2014 calendar year.
Deliver to cost
This project was delivered to within the agreed tolerance with the Project Board, final
spend was £247,823 with an original budget of £240,000.
Deliver to quality
Product – the project delivered against the acceptance criteria detailed within the
Project Initiation Document (PID).
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 13 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
Cash – no projected cost savings.
Benefit
Cashable N/A
Non cashable Provides the foundation to deliver a single Scottish Fire and Rescue Service - provides email archive functionality to aid the integration of the 8 legacy services.
Provides the foundation to deliver a single Scottish Fire and Rescue Service - a centralised SFRS backup solution resulting in the continuing reduction of overall maintenance and aiding the reduction in the number of separate teams/personnel carrying-out this function.
Please detail any realised disbenefits or unintended negative consequences.
Disbenefit
Cashable n/a
Non cashable n/a
Interdependencies with other projects
Project Interdependency Impact
AD Migration Each legacy Service must
be migrated onto the new
SFRS AD (Active Directory)
before the email archive
solution can be
implemented.
To date the only areas that have the
email archive solution implemented
are Central and Dumfries & Galloway.
This will prevent a full service-wide roll
out until the AD Migration project is
complete (current projection for the
remainder of the Email Archive roll-out
is the end of the current calendar
year).
Lessons identified
Lesson
After the upgrade of the CommVault software an issue was found. This issue was
raised with CommVault support to investigate. The lesson learned around this is the
vendor who conducted the upgrade should have been the first point of contact to lead
the investigation of the issue.
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 14 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
It was clearly shown that a pilot phase with feedback was essential to provide good
and clear user documentation. The initial documentation was too technical and
spanned 3 pages, after consultation this was summarised to one page.
Outstanding Project Risks (please highlight the position with any outstanding risks
associated with your project
Concern Mitigation Probability Impact
There are no outstanding project
risks or issues.
Future projects (please highlight any potential future projects which need to be considered by the Service Transformation Programme Manager)
Title Intended product/benefit
n/a
Performance Measure (please confirm the performance indicators and method of data gathering to be used to measure the success of the project)
Performance indictor Method
Provides email archive functionality to
aid the integration of the 8 legacy
services to create a single Scottish
Fire Service.
Access any legacy email from a user based
within the former Central or Dumfries &
Galloway regions. This roll out will continue
behind the AD Migration project which is due
for completion in the autumn of 2014.
Commvault Backup Solution
The CommVault system is being used as the backup and recovery methodology for all
systems being implemented within ICT. This is presently covering file system backup, mail
system backup and database backups. The system is also used for mailbox archiving based
on rules and requirements defined by the business. The solution also rationalises the on-
going maintenance costs of the 8 legacy services to a single maintenance cost going
forwards.
System Management
Implementing this solution has centralised the system monitoring/management through
removing duplicated work tasks that were carried out by the antecedent services. This
centralised solution will now be managed by a team of 3 system technicians (previously this
would have required 1 system technician per service located at each site to carry out these
tasks as part of their daily workloads).
Paper 8
STC/Report/ClosingReports Page 15 of 15 Version: 1.0 11 September 2014
This solution also enables proactive system administration and management by exception
(as opposed to constant manual monitoring or reactive system administration) based on the
content of daily automatically generated reports.