parent action: acceptance & commitment training for parents amy r murrell, jonathan schmalz, p r...

63
PARENT ACTION: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE ACCEPTANCE & & COMMITMENT COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Upload: arthur-maxwell

Post on 23-Dec-2015

243 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

PARENT ACTION:PARENT ACTION:

ACCEPTANCEACCEPTANCE & &

COMMITMENTCOMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTSTRAINING FOR PARENTS

Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde

University of North Texas

Page 2: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Q: What is the sound of one hand clapping?

A: The sound of one hand clapping is the sound of one hand clapping.

A Little Question and Answer Session

Q: What is the sound of one child misbehaving?

A: The sound of one child misbehaving is the sound of one child misbehaving.

Page 3: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Q: What is the sound of “my” child misbehaving?

A: The sound of my failure, the sound of my lack of control, the sound of "I should have control", the sound of "I can't take another second of this, “ the sound of "I hate this child," the sound of "I shouldn't hate this child”, the sound of "what is wrong with me," the sound of “well, anyone would feel this way," the sound of "yeah, but I am the parent- I am supposed to love him," and on and on and on…

Page 4: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Behavioral Parent Training –Principles and Programs Behavioral parent training is a broad term

Set of structured activities targeted to parents Can be used to address general skills or child

behavior Has been used (efficaciously and effectively) for a

wide variety of issues ranging from prevention of child abuse and neglect (Smagner & Sullivan, 2005), to management of ADHD, CD (Patterson, Reid, & Dishion, 1992),

and anxiety with children (Diamond & Josephson, 2005). Many different sets/programs, by many names

PMT (Kazdin, 1992), Incredible Years (Webster-Stratton, 1994),

Triple-P (Saunders, Cann, & Markie-Dodds, 2003), Parents as Teachers …

All have in common – emphasis on antecedent control and management of consequences

Page 5: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Behavioral Conceptualization of

Parenting Classical Conditioning

Repeated pairings close in time

Page 6: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Behavioral Conceptualization of Parenting

Operant Conditioning

Page 7: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Treatment Approach for Directly Conditioned Responses

Extinction: Stop pairing the S and R Habituation: “Cue exposure” Response Prevention Counterconditioning Replace with Incompatible Behaviors Other Contingency Management

Page 8: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Basics of behavioral parenting interventions Consistency

Structure, organize, & plan clearly Set limits and delineate rules

Catch them being good and label it specifically

Reinforce “good” behavior with reward Use distraction Use planned ignoring and/or time-out Use appropriate consequences – fast,

reasonable, etc.

Page 9: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

And they work!!

Shown to decrease: Abuse and neglect Delinquency, anxiety, and antisocial

behavior Evidence of increase in:

Positive parent-child interactions Child social skills Child coping skills

Page 10: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Except when they don’t…

Perhaps more easily said than done Most of them fail to address

Parents’ internal context (thoughts, feelings, etc.) External context factors like

Work stress or money problems Marital and broader family relationships

Research shows that treatment gains are not as robust or as long-lasting when there are complicating factors Need treatment that addresses these

contextual factors

Page 11: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Internal and External

Relational frames, or indirect conditioning Adds a contextual piece Adds a “meaning” piece

Provide in-home services, daycare, transportation, and other case management type services *This piece is difficult and expensive but

most of us do know how, given resources (the first point needs work)

Page 12: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

More on internal context

Multiple ways to address this piece Kabat-Zinn’s Everyday Blessings work Singh’s Mindful Parenting work Wahler, Dumas, and Strand’s work Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

Greco’s findings Blackledge’s findings

ACT based on RFT

Page 13: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Relational Frames

“My child”

ME

CME

“Misbehavior”

Events acquire meaning through relational responding

Related events have same psychological functions (depending on context)

Page 14: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

What Indirect Conditioning Gives Us

Good Ability to balance long- and short- term

contingencies Communication over time and distance Broad ability to evaluate, categorize, sort Broad ability to plan and execute based on

evaluations** Advantage in treatment and usually in life

Bad Can’t turn it off and may turn on you

No contact with contingencies Commands literal response (which is often avoidance)

Page 15: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

What this might look like

Kids take on aversive qualities for parents Meaning

My child = A collection of misbehaviors Narrowing of behavioral repertoire

If you teach techniques alone Susceptible to falling back Goals, not values

Suggests the need to address indirect learning processes as well

Page 16: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Acceptance and Commitment Therapy

ACT is a behavioral treatment that specifically addresses indirect learning processes as well as direct conditioning.

Aim is to undermine these processes when they are ineffective and to increase psychological flexibility in the service of having richer, bigger, more meaningful lives

Page 17: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Six Core Components of ACT

Self asContext

Contact with the Present Moment

Defusion

Acceptance

Committed Action

Values

EssentialComponents

of ACT

Page 18: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Self asContext

Contact with the Present Moment

Defusion

Acceptance

Committed Action

Values

Page 19: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Self asContext

Contact with the Present Moment

Defusion

Acceptance

Committed Action

Values

Page 20: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Self asContext

Contact with the Present Moment

Defusion

Acceptance

Committed Action

Values

ACT Question

are you willing to have that stuff, fully and without defense

if the answer is “yes” that’s

as it is, and not as what it says it is,

Given a distinction between you and the stuff you are struggling

with and trying to change

AND do what takes you in the direction

of your chosen values

at this time, in this situation?

Psychological Flexibility

Page 21: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Acceptance

Allow self to have whole of experiences When doing so fosters effective action

No Dangerous, unhealthy, or unproductive

situations Emotional wallowing

Not tolerance Yes

Thoughts, emotions, memories, history, bodily states, behavioral dispositions

Hopelessness of struggle/control is the problem

Page 22: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Fusion & Defusion

Fusion is the process whereby certain verbal functions dominate over other directly and indirectly available psychological functions Cognition stands in for experience

Defusion is the process whereby other directly and indirectly available psychological functions become available

Page 23: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Defusion

ANYTHING that involves interacting with the aversive event that is not avoidance

Optimally, a wide variety of rich interactions As different as possible from the usual ways

of interacting (functionally, if not formally)

Page 24: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Contact with Present Moment

Contact with current contingencies Here and now Showing up

Appreciation without evaluation or defense Notice and label

Page 25: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Self-as-Context

Sense of self that is safe and consistent

Observe all changing experiences Without evaluation

Page 26: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Values/Valuing

Powerful reinforcement

What one wants to be about

Choose vs. decide

Talk in terms of importance and consistency

Page 27: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Committed Action

Making life about living values Not about eliminating pain

Defining specific goals Anticipating barriers

Changeability is important consideration

Page 28: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session one: Overview of ACT: Accept, Choose & Take Action

Basic introduction, group “rules”, etc. Discussion of why participants joined the group Basic introduction to ACT as an intervention

Suffering as normal part of being human (and being a parent)

Undermining the struggle How ACT may be used to improve parent

functioning Support “living out” of parenting values Effective management of adolescents’ behavior

Page 29: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session One: Overview Of Act: Accept, Choose & Take Action

The ways in which parent emotions, beliefs, social comparisons, etc. “show up” in role as caregivers How hard we struggle to “figure it out” Child relevant fears Create a space to find out what’s important

as parents, regardless of the “stuff” Falling in the hole metaphor

Commitment to catch each other from trying to “figure it out”

Page 30: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Two: Parenting Values: Remembering What Matters Most

Behavioral skills training Contingencies and changes in the

environment Consistency

Discussion of how words can get us “spun out” Pen metaphor Can we notice how a word affects us Can we notice it without judgment

Page 31: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Two: Parenting Values: Remembering What Matters Most

Sunrise/Sunset metaphor Note what values guide

relationships with children When heading toward and

away What obstacles are getting in

the way What the distance and being

“off-course” feels like Valuing

What really matters to you? What is vital?

Clarification of valuing vs. values

Parenting values worksheet

Page 32: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Three: Is the Goal Control? Managing Content vs. Managing Behavior

Revisit Values Worksheets Visual Representation for Sunset Metaphor

Specific behaviors are markers for valued direction Discuss briefly the reasons for use of

metaphor/story Distributed flyer on managing child behavior

Page 33: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Three: Is the Goal Control? Managing Content vs. Managing Behavior

Identification of what is in sunrise and what occurs as clouds and wind for each participant What negative thoughts/feelings do you have

about parenting? About your child? What about “yucky” bodily sensations or other

negative content? What do you do in response to this stuff?

How does that work?

Page 34: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Three: Is the Goal Control? Managing Content vs. Managing Behavior

Normalize the difficulties associated with parenting an adolescent Fleeting nature of thoughts and feelings (but

how real they feel!) Vulnerabilities: “Looking good” vs. doing what

is best

Page 35: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Four: Beginning to Let Go of Control

Moving across room toward sunrise with “mind” and chairs as obstacles It’s easier to take “stuff” along than to fight it

Page 36: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Five: Mindfulness & Acceptance Write obstacles on physical representation of

clouds Process content “Milk, milk, milk” exercise with most powerful

content Clouds passing on horizon mindfulness exercise

Correlate of “Leaves on a Stream” metaphor Homework: Try exercise once during the next

week

Page 37: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Six: Present Moment Awareness: Building a Responsive Relationship

Process mindfulness exercise from previous week and homework

Mindfulness exercise as a group (clouds in the sky)

Processing Do some things repeat, move faster, slower? Present moment awareness and observation without

reaction Behavioral skills like labeled praise (another

worksheet)

Page 38: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Seven: Willingness and Committed Action: Standing Up for Your Child

Mindfulness exercise More behavioral skills, like grounding even when

unpleasant! The barriers to consistency and following up Normalizing difficulties with barriers

Willingness in the face of barriers Pen in the hand metaphor

Consistency with rewards People are sunsets, not math problems

Page 39: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Eight: Common Challenges “Slips” are normal Mindfulness exercise: Noticing bodily sensations Ways of being your reactions

Ways I act in the moment Do these actions move me toward my valued direction?

Self as context piece Chessboard metaphor

Statement of one small concrete action to be taken in the following week; minding there may be “slips”

Page 40: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Nine: Strategies for Dealing with Hot Button Issues that Many Parents Face

Discussion of how the one concrete action from week 8 went

Recognizing context and not just content

Page 41: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Nine: Strategies for Dealing with or Hot Button Issues that Many Parents Face

Adolescents show tough behavior, in the face of it, we can use: Positive and negative reinforcement Behavioral shaping Appropriate use of directions and consequences Planned ignoring Token systems

This helps get us out of the content and into context!

Page 42: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

10 Session Protocol

Session Ten: Exposure to Forgiveness and Generalization and Maintenance

“Big Steps/Bold Moves” Self and child- real and imagined failures

and imagined forgiveness Process consequences

Team building (asking for help) Reminders about “slips” Recommitments

Page 43: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Measures

Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS) Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ) Acceptance and Action Questionnaire II (AAQ-II) Kentucky Inventory of Mindfulness Skills (KIMS) Behavior Assessment System for Children (BASC-2) Depression Anxiety and Stress Scales, Short Form

(DASS-21) Youth Outcome Questionnaire 30.1 (Y-OQ-30.1) Stress Index for Parents of Adolescents (SIPA) Participant Interviews

Page 44: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Emotion Regulation – Participant 1

Page 45: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Emotion Regulation – Participant 2

Page 46: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Emotion Regulation – Participant 3

Page 47: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Experiential Avoidance – AAQ-2

Page 48: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Mindfulness – Participant 1

Page 49: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Mindfulness – Participant 2

Page 50: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Mindfulness – Participant 3

Page 51: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Externalizing Bx – BASC-2

Page 52: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Internalizing Bx– BASC-2

Page 53: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Symptomology – DASS-21

Page 54: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Behavioral Outcomes – YOQ 30.1

Participant

Page 55: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Parenting Stress (SIPA) – Participant 1

Page 56: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Parenting Stress (SIPA) – Participant 2

Page 57: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Parenting Stress (SIPA) – Participant 3

Page 58: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Interviews – Participant One

Asked what her overall opinion of the group was at follow-up:

“I was at the end of my rope with my daughter… (She) is doing great and I think it’s [sic] because of some of the things I was able to use from the ACT program.”

Page 59: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Interviews – Participant Two

Q: Has anything been particularly helpful?

A: Learning more about discipline as opposed to punishment.

Q: Has there been anything that you felt like was a waste of time?

A: No, Amy has a master plan.

Page 60: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Interviews – Participant Three Q: Has the experience thus far been emotionally

difficult or distressing in any way? A: It’s emotional, but not difficult, realizing how tied

up in my son I am.

Q: Has there been anything that you felt like was particularly helpful?

A: There isn’t a perfect fix.

Q: Do you think that your situation with your kid has changed?

A: I’m calmer in situations, which facilitates more understanding.

Page 61: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Summary & Discussion

This pilot study using acceptance and mindfulness strategies in conjunction with behavioral parent training found:

Significant improvements with some key variables Though some predicted by ACT model not seen moving

as might be expected EA found in previous studies to worsen at first “Temporary mindfulness”

Most other variables moving in “right” directions, though not significantly Other studies have shown a lag effect in ACT processes

That participants report they found treatment useful

Page 62: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Summary & Discussion

Some confounds: Participant 2 missed a couple of sessions Participants 1 and 2 are married and

parenting the same child Follow-up necessary in future research

Page 63: PARENT ACTION: ACCEPTANCE & COMMITMENT TRAINING FOR PARENTS Amy R Murrell, Jonathan Schmalz, P R Mitchell, Cicely T LaBorde University of North Texas

Where to?

Larger groups and more of them Recruitment troubles

Longer sessions Include follow up measures Further investigation of the use of ACT

and other acceptance and mindfulness based approaches with parents is warranted.