parity mtg, 18 may 2007 bob michaels lead target and warm septum interface performance of lead...

11
Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from e06007 Short update on Septum Interface.

Upload: aaron-diaz

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface

• Performance of Lead Target during e06007

• Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from e06007

• Short update on Septum Interface.

Page 2: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

E06007 Lead Target Performance

• E06007 Pb(e,e’p) ran Mar 5-20, 2007

• Pb/diamond target like PREX

• Pb 0.17 mm (PREX 0.5 mm)

• diamond 0.15 mm (same PREX)

• 2 days @ 55 uA no failure

• Ramped to 85 uA target melted !

• Ran 2nd target @ 45 uA 2 weeks no failure

• Calibrate simulations of radiation

Page 3: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Pb #4Ran 2 weeks @ 45 uA

Pb #3Ran 2 days @ 55 uAFailed near 85 uA

E06007 Lead Targets

discoloration from beam (rastered)

Page 4: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Monolithic TargetMultilayer Target

Q

Heat Load t

t(thickness)

Conduction tTemp. Indpt. of t

C / Pb / C

Pb is an extra heat load for C.

Target Heating Considerations

Model assumes good contact !

Page 5: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

2/73 cmW2/376 cmW

diamond

lead

PREX heat loads

E06007 lead is 1/3 this Temp at center ~½ PREX

(not quite 1/3 )

Did not expect e06007 melting

But if no contact, lead melts @ ~ 40 uA. (3x3 raster)

Extrapolate to PREX (assumes same contact)

Temperature : Extrapolating from E06007

Safe: 27 uA Melt : 40 uAGuess: temp at border ~ 50 K

(indpt. of thickness)

Page 6: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Target Heating -- Conclusions

• Want good thermal contact. • Will vacuum grease help ?

• Need procedure to center target.

• Need more test beam ?

Pure hydrocarbon, high conductivity, low vapor pressure

e.g. “Apiezon L”

Page 7: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Lead Radiation Lead

E06007 Pb(e,e’p)

Mar 5 – 20, 2007

Hours 1450 - 2010 in plot

Calibrate simulation Extrap. to PREX

Report by Bob M. & Pavel Degtiarenko:

http://hallaweb.jlab.org/parity/prex/prex_rad.pdf

Page 8: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Site boundary neutrons

(photons add ~25% more)

Lead

e06007 Bad beam tune

Page 9: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

E06007 PREX

Lead 193 568

Diamond 105 105

Beam Energy (GeV) 2.65 0.85

Beam Current 42 50

Calc. Rad. Rate. 0.7 3.1

Measured Rad. Rate. 0.35 ---Accumulated

Radiation (calculated) 0.5 mrem 2.2 mrem

(22% budget)

Accum. Radiation (measured) < 0.30 mrem ---

2cm

mg

2cm

mg

A

hrrem /

hrrem /Factor of ~2

Page 10: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels

Radiation -- conclusions

• PREX: 22% yearly site boundary budget

• Probably ~1/2 that (estimates are conservative)

• Factor of 4 – 10 more radiation inside hall A.

• But don’t use the bad beam tune experience as a guide.

• May need local shielding on IOCs on

downstream beamline.

( For PREX compared to e06007 )

( last 5 days e06007 had beam scraping )

Page 11: Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels Lead Target and Warm Septum Interface Performance of Lead Target during e06007 Radiation for PREX, extrapolated from

Parity Mtg, 18 May 2007 Bob Michaels