Park County School Distr ict #6

MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR 2010-11

MEASURES OF ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE

MAP

Purpose: Progress Monitor tool for K-3 Reading (Individual Reading Plan-IRP) State Pilot Mandate – Fall 2011 through Spring 2012

Use of MAP Data: One leg of data used in Title I-A Schools One leg of data used to identify students for Response to Intervention support Placement of incoming students i.e. home school/private school Pre (Fall) and Post (Spring) Data to show growth;

Feedback is timely Determine areas of strength and areas in need of improvement

RIT Bands Des Cartes Strategies

Validated data for Teacher/Principal Evaluation

MAP READING DATAFALL 2010 – SPRING 2011

Spring 2011 Reading MAPDistrict Summary

K 1st Grade

2nd Grade

3rd Grade

4th Grade

5th Grade

6th Grade

7th Grade

8th Grade

9th Grade

10th Grade

Average Student Growth

20.7 18.8 17.7 13 8.6 6.4 5.2 3.9 6.8 1.7 11.3

Average Growth Target

11.1 13.2 13.8 9.3 6.5 4.5 5 4.1 3.6 2.9 2.2

2.5

7.5

12.5

17.5

22.5

MAPFall 2010 - Spring 2011 Reading

District Growth Summary

Average Student Growth

MAP MATH DATA FALL 2010 – SPRING 2011

K 1st Grade 2nd Grade 3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade

7th Grade 8th Grade

Average Student Growth

23.1 17.1 15 14.2 12.8 12.1 7.2 8.2 9.8

Average Growth Target

12.8 15.2 13.5 10.7 8.9 7.2 6.6 6 4.4

2.5

7.5

12.5

17.5

22.5

MAPFall 2010 - Spring 2011 Mathematics

District Growth Summary

Average Student GrowthAverage Growth Target

ADDITIONAL MAP DATA CLARIFICATION

The MAP data in this report is specific to student growth using the mean score.

Even though this report and the WDE 626 both use MAP as their data source, the scores look different due to:

• WDE 626 uses a state established cut score for proficiency• NWEA MAP uses a mean score to report student growth

Note that there is no MAP growth targets for mathematics on the report for Grades 9-12 – this is due being grade specific i.e. 9th graders may be in algebra I or geometry or algebra II or applied math.

STATE ASSESSMENT - PAWS DATA

Purpose: Establish Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Meet requirements of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Use of PAWS Data: One leg of data used in Title I-A Schools One leg of data used to identify students for Response to Intervention support Shows trends for sub-groups;

Graduation Rate Gender Socio-Economic Status (SES) Special Education

May be used to set school/department goals Validated data for Teacher/Principal Evaluation

PAWS READING DATASPRING 2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Reading 78.79 92.72 90 81.33 83.42 85.88 80.79

AYP Target in LA 65.2 65.2 65.2 65.2 67.25 67.25 74.2

Writing 92.12 87.42 96.88 83.33 79.27 85.29 90.07

10

30

50

70

90

110

ReadingAYP Target in LAWriting

PAWS MATH DATASPRING 2011

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Math 92.17 92.81 91.25 80.79 81.35 84.12 72

AYP Target in Math 61.9 61.9 61.9 61.9 62.65 62.65 67.9

5

15

25

35

45

55

65

75

85

95

MathAYP Target in Math

2011-2012 MAP/PAWS PLAN

MAP

K-12 FallWinterSpring

PAWS

SPRING 2012 ADMINISTRATION

GRADES 3-8 & 11*