part 5: anti-reverse-engineering
DESCRIPTION
Part 5: Anti-Reverse-Engineering. Chapter 15: Anti-Disassembly Chapter 16: Anti-Debugging Chapter 17: Anti-Virtual Machine Techniques Chapter 18: Packing and Unpacking. Chapter 15: Anti-Disassembly. Anti-Disassembly. 1. Understanding Anti-Disassembly 2. Defeating Disassembly Algorithms - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Part 5: Anti-Reverse-Engineering
Chapter 15: Anti-DisassemblyChapter 16: Anti-Debugging
Chapter 17: Anti-Virtual Machine TechniquesChapter 18: Packing and Unpacking
Chapter 15: Anti-Disassembly
Anti-Disassembly
1. Understanding Anti-Disassembly
2. Defeating Disassembly Algorithms
3. Anti-Disassembly Techniques
4. Obscuring Flow Control
5. Thwarting Stack-Frame Analysis
1. Understanding Anti-DisassemblySpecial code to cause disassembly analysis to produce
incorrect program listings Goal is to delay or prevent analysis of malicious code Thwart automated and manual analysis
Tricking disassembly at an incorrect offset Examples on p. 328 and 329
2. Defeating Disassembly AlgorithmsTwo types of algorithms
Linear disassembly Iterate over a block of code, disassembling one instruction at a
time linearly Decode blindly from start to end, ignores flow-control instructions
that cause only a part of the buffer to execute (Examples on p. 331)
Opcode 0xE8 assumed to be “call”, next 4 bytes assumed to be target (can instead contain malicious code)
Flow-oriented disassembly Builds list of locations to assemble by examining code from entry p. 332: After unconditional jmp, decoding stops Arbitrary results based on the order in which conditional branches
and calls are followed by disassembler (p. 333, 334)
3. Anti-Disassembly TechniquesJump instructions with the Same Target
Back-to-back conditional jumps with the same target jz followed by jnz should be treated as unconditional jmp
(Example on p. 335) Toggle bytes from code to data using “C” and “U”
Jump instruction with a constant condition XOR reg,reg followed by jz (Example on p. 336) Note: Both methods use a “rogue” byte (0xE9 or 0xE8)
Impossible disassembly Using a single byte in two instructions Disassembler limited to picking one interpretation, but
processor can use both Inward jump (Figure 15-4) More complex case (Figure 15-5)
4. Obscuring Flow ControlFunction pointers
Locations resolved at run-time Hard to statically reverse engineer
Return pointer abuse Modify return value on stack at run-time (return-oriented
programming)• call $+5 on Example on p. 342
Misusing structured exception handlers SEH allows program to handle error conditions intelligently Uses a stack to manage (FS segment register) Example on p. 346: Push pointer to exception routine onto
she stack, then trigger exception (divide-by-zero). Routine is not disassembled
5. Thwarting Stack-Frame AnalysisStack-frame analysis dependent upon compiler used
Calling conventions vary Custom management also possible such as management
using esp directly Listing 15-1 does not use ebp, breaking IDA Pro analysis
• cmp instruction is more or less predictable, but IDA Pro traces incorrect branch
• Misses “add esp, 104h” and shows esp getting into an incorrect range (at -F8)
In-class exerciseLab 15-01
In IDA Pro, what anti-disassembly technique is used and how many times is it used? Undo the anti-disassembly in IDA Pro
What order is the input checked?
In-class exerciseLab 15-02
Explain the false conditional at 0x0040115A. Patch it. (cfg/idagui.cfg , ENABLE_PATCH_SUBMENU NO)
Explain the false conditional at 0x004011D0. Patch it. Explain the technique being used at 0x00401215. Patch it. Explain the technique being used at 0x00401269. Patch it. Explain the technique being used at 0x004012E6. Which two
methods does it combine? Patch it to reveal Listing 15-7L. Step through analysis of the malicious code
• What do sub_40130F and sub_401386 do?
• Show how the first downloaded file is used to generate the second downloaded file
• Show how the second downloaded file is used
Chapter 16: Anti-Debugging
Anti-DebuggingAnti-analysis technique for malware to recognize when it is
under the control of a debugger Slow down analysis as much as possible to increase window
of vulnerability Hundreds of techniques
Anti-Debugging
1. Windows Debugger Detection
2. Identifying Debugger Behavior
3. Interfering with Debugger Functionality
4. Debugger Vulnerabilities
1. Windows Debugger DetectionUsing the Windows API
IsDebuggerPresent() returns 0 if no debugger attached by searching the Process Environment Block for field IsDebugged
CheckRemoteDebuggerPresent() allows one to check the IsDebugged flag on other processes
NTQueryInformationProcess using value ProcessDebugPort OutputDebugString (Listing 16-1)
1. Windows Debugger DetectionManual checks
Bypass Windows API to check memory locations directly Preferred by malware since calls can be hooked by anti-virus BeingDebugged flag
• Loading of PEB structure address fs:[30h] (Listing 16-2)
• Followed by access of BeingDebugged flag at offset 0x2 (Table 16-1)
Debugger heap check• Get address of first ProcessHeap by loading value at
0x18 into PEB structure, then access flag field at 0x10 (XP) or 0x44 (Win7) (Listing 16-3)
1. Windows Debugger DetectionManual checks
NtGlobalFlag check• Heap management different for debugged programs
• Specified at 0x68 offset in PEB. Set to 0x70 if debugged (Listing 16-4)
Registry values used by debuggers (HKLM\....\AeDebug) Window names (e.g. OLLYDBG) File system Debugging services, API hooks (OllyDbg detour of OpenProcess),
well-known fixed values in memory (e.g. OllyDbg stores some strings at 0x004B064B)
2. Identifying Debugger BehaviorINT scanning
INT 3 inserted by debugger to temporarily replace an instruction so that debug exception handler can run when software breakpoints are hit (Opcode 0xCC)
Search for 0xCC in code (Listing 16-6)
Performing code checksums Malware performs checksum on its code pages and exits if
tampering detected
Timing checks Malware take timestamps and exits if there is a lag Especially effective when taken before and after an
exception Implemented via rdtsc instruction (Listing 16-7),
QueryPerformanceCounter, or GetTickCount (Listing 16-8)
2. Identifying Debugger BehaviorDebugger artifacts
INT 1 overwrites 6 bytes below current ESP with return values for IP, CS, and Flags
PUSH AX
POP AX
DEC SP
DEC SP
POP BX
CMP AX,BX
JNE CODE_IS_TRACED
Force INT 1/INT 3 tracing to disable essential • Use a canary similar to StackGuard
• Hide critical value (e.g. decryption key) on stack directly without modifying stack pointer
• Debugger overwrites value if it runs
2. Identifying Debugger BehaviorDebugger artifacts
Check registers/flags saved by debugger such as DR0-DR7• Set handler and force exception (divide by zero)
• Debug registers saved on stack on context switch
• Read and write values directly
Execute exception with Trap flag set• No debugger = SEH occurs
• Debugger attached = SEH will not occur
3. Interfering with Debugger Functionality
Using TLS (thread local storage) callbacks Debuggers pause at program entry point defined by the PE
header TLS implemented in an executable contains a .tls section
that is initialized before program entry point Most debuggers can be configured to pause before TLS
callback code if a .tls section is present in malware
Using exceptions Debuggers can be configured to either trap exceptions or
pass them through automatically to application Malware probes to ensure exceptions are passed through
quickly
3. Interfering with Debugger Functionality
Inserting interrupts Inserting a long loop of INT 3 instructions Inserting 0xCD03 (STATUS_BREAKPOINT) to generate an INT 3. Inserting INT 2D (kernel debugger breakpoint) Running line of code
• Hook INT 1
• Decrypt next instruction, encrypt previous one
• Only one instruction decrypted in memory at a time
• Hard to analyze
Side-effects of having a debugger attached result in malware changing how it executes
• Have malicious code be a part of an SEH handler
• INT 3 without debugger returns exception directly back into program to handle
• INT 3 with debugger goes elsewhere (Listing 16-9)
3. Interfering with Debugger Functionality
Modifying expected interrupt behavior Continually overwrite Interrupt Vector of INT 1/3 instructions
to point to garbage code to crash debugger Turning off keyboard interrupts
IN AL, 20h
OR AL, 02
OUT AL, 20
<virus code>
IN AL, 20
AND AL, NOT 2
OUT AL,20
4. Debugger VulnerabilitiesPE header vulnerabilities
OllyDbg follows specifications of PE headers more strictly than Windows. Crashes on malformed headers that will run without debugger
Code vulnerabilities OutputDebugString vulnerable to format string vulnerability in
OllyDbg v. 1.1. Pass malformed string to crash debugger Exploit instructions that OllyDbg handles differently than
CPU to crash debugger Exploit exceptions that OllyDbg handles differently than CPU
to crash debugger (memory handling)
In-class exerciseLab 16-01
Load the binary in IDA Pro. Bring up Figure 16-1L and explain what the three jz checks are doing
Bring up sub_401000 and Listing 16-1L. What does this code do? Load the binary in OllyDbg
• Set a breakpoint at 0x00403554. What is the value of eax? Step over several instructions. What happens?
• Bring up Figure 16-2L or Figure 16-3L (via the Command Line plug-in or Phant0m plug-in) to reset the flag
• Re-run the first OllyDbg step. What happens?
• Explain the second anti-debugging check at 0x00403573 and how to bypass it
• Explain the third anti-debugging check at 0x00403594 and how to bypass it
• Set the argument to “-in” and single-step to reach 0x004035D5.
Chapter 17: Anti-Virtual Machine Techniques
Anti-Virtual Machine TechniquesVirtual machines initially used only by malware analysts
Malware benefited from detecting VM (especially VMware) and shutting down to escape analysis
Method is increasingly uncommon as a result of the prevalent use of VMs by normal users
• Rollback recovery easy
• Portability
Anti-Virtual Machine Techniques
1. VMware Artifacts
2. Vulnerable Instructions
3. Tweaking Settings
4. Escaping the Virtual Machine
1. VMware ArtifactsFilesystem (e.g. C:\Program Files\VMware\VMware Tools)
Registry p. 371
Process listing Figure 17-1
Memory (invariant strings in VMware virtual machine)
Networking MAC addresses assigned for use by IEEE for VMware NICs
begin with 00:0C:29
1. VMware ArtifactsExample code to check
Listing 17-1
Circumventing checks Patch condition on branch to bypass in debugger Use hex editor to modify VMware string Uninstall VMware tool being checked
2. Vulnerable InstructionsInstructions exposing host machine
For performance, virtual machine monitors allow certain instructions to execute directly
Instructions such as sidt, sgdt, sldt access hardware registers directly without generating an interrupt
Can expose inconsistency within guest VM Must NOP out the check
Querying the I/O communication port (Phatbot, Storm) VMware virtualizes I/O ports Port can be queried to detect presence of VMware Obtaining VMware version via IO port (Listing 17-3) Must NOP out the check
Common Anti-VM instructions sidt, sgdt, sldt, smsw, str, in, cpuid 20 instructions designated by VMware as “not virtualizable”
3. Tweaking SettingsVMware provides options to hide itself from malware
Listing 17-5 Protects against all checks implemented by ScoopyNG, a
free VMware detection tool Last-resort since performance will crater if used
4. Escaping the Virtual MachineExploiting VMware bugs to crash host or run code in it
Shared folder feature Drag-and-drop functionality in VMware Tools VM display function
In-class exerciseLab 17-01
In IDA Pro, show and explain the three anti-VM checks being performed Run the code
• Break before the first anti-VM check. Does this check succeed? If so, NOP or skip the check and run again.
• Break before the second anti-VM check. Does this check succeed? If so, NOP or skip the check and run again.
• Break before the third anti-VM check by setting a breakpoint at 0x004012CB and stepping into sub_401100. Does this check succeed? If so, NOP or skip the check and run again.
• Reach the beginning of malware code at 0x004012DF and generate Listing 17-5L
Chapter 18: Packers and Unpacking
PackersUsed to shrink malware and thwart detection by antivirus
Thwarts static analysis since malware must be unpacked before it can be analyzed
Original executable transformed to a new self-extracting one via compression, encryption, or obfuscation making it harder to recognize and reverse-engineer
Typically employs anti-disassembly, anti-debugging, and anti-VM techniques to prevent unpacking on an analyst machine
Packers and Unpacking1. Packer Anatomy
2. Identifying Packed Programs
3. Unpacking Options
4. Tips and Tricks for Common Packers
5. Packed DLLs
1. Packer AnatomyUnpacking Stub
Small piece of code loaded by the operating system just as a normal program
Unpacking stub then loads original program Step #1: Unpacking original executable into memory
• Loader reads PE header and copies sections into allocated memory normally
• Unpacking code does the same for packed code
Step #2: Resolve imports of original executable• Loader reads PE header to find library functions to
import and their addresses
• Unless packed code's imports included in unpacking code's import section, unpacker must resolve imports manually using LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress
Step #3: Transfers execution to original execution point• Tail jump to entry point
1. Packer AnatomyUnpacking samples
Save flags and all registers (PUSHFD, PUSHAD), call unpacking routine
Within unpacking routine
Jump to OEP (original execution point)• Tail jump (POPAD/POPFD restoration, PUSH followed by a
RET!)
• Set breakpoint at 0x0040CA96 and dump memory image
0040AC44 FFFF INVALID0040AC4C 9C PUSHFD0040AC4D 60 PUSHAD0040AC4E E802000000 CALL 0040AC55**If you step over this CALL using F10, the program will run. Thus, reload the program and step into this CALL using F8 next time.
aaaaaaaa...wwwwwwwwxxxxxxxx JNZ zzzzzzzz <-- Loop back to aaaaaaaayyyyyyyy JMP aaaaaaaazzzzzzzz New Instructions
0040CA83 8BBD2E744000 MOV EDI,[EBP+0040742E]0040CA89 E85E040000 CALL 0040CEEC0040CA8E 61 POPAD0040CA8F 9D POPFD0040CA90 50 PUSH EAX0040CA91 68CC104000 PUSH 004010CC0040CA96 C20400 RET 0004
1. Packer AnatomyUnpacking samples
Alternate jump to OEP
Can also use a jmp (Listing 18-1)• Note: empty bytes after JMP and huge offset
• IDA Pro can identify JMP goes to garbage and flags it red (Figure 18-5)
015F:01017554 MOV [ESP+1C],EAX015F:01017558 POPAD015F:01017559 JNZ 01017563 (JUMP )015F:01017563 PUSH EAX *** Take note of the valueof EAX!015F:01017564 RET *** Stop here!!!
2. Identifying Packed ProgramsSimple indicators
Program with few imports and imports are LoadLibrary and GetProcAddress
IDA Pro recognizes a small amount of code Presence of UPX0 section (a specific packer) Abnormal section sizes Used by tools such as PEiD to determine if code is packed
Entropy calculation Disorder in a program much larger in encrypted and
compressed payloads
3. Unpacking OptionsAutomated static unpacking
Decompress and decrypt executable to restore original code Specific to a packer (i.e. you must know which packer was
used) PE Explorer
• Supports NSPack, UPack, and UPX
Automated dynamic unpacking Program is run and unpacker stub is allowed to unpack
original executable Once tail jump is reached, memory is dumped and original
program written to disk Fails if the end of unpacking stub is not identified properly Not many publicly available tools for this
3. Unpacking OptionsManual dynamic unpacking
Option #1: Discover packing algorithm and write a program to run it in reverse
Option #2: Run packed program so unpacking stub does the work
• Break and dump the process out of memory (Listing 18-2 and 18-3)
• Manually fix up PE header so program is complete
Helpful tools• OllyDump plug-in for OllyDbg (performs OEP
identification, import table reconstruction, entry point patching)
• ImpRec (Import Reconstructor) when OllyDump fails to build a proper import table
3. Unpacking OptionsManual dynamic unpacking
Finding OEP via stack trace• Upon entry into unpacking stub, registers often pushed
• Set a breakpoint for esp accessing those stack locations again
• Indicates unpacking code is finished and a jump to original entry point forthcoming
Finding OEP via iteration• Break at the end of each loop and iterate until tail jump
identified
Manual import table patching• Two tables: table of function names, table of addresses
• Listing 18-4 when import table broken
• Cross-reference between OllyDbg and IDA Pro to patch import table with function name
4. Tips and Tricks for Common Packers
UPX (Ultimate Packer for eXecutables) Open-source Designed for compression not for security OllyDump finds easily using heuristics previously described
PECompact Similar to UPX, uses a tail jump of jmp *eax
ASPack Uses self-modifying code to thwart analysis
4. Tips and Tricks for Common Packers
Petite Uses single-step exceptions to break into debugger Must pass single-step exceptions back to Petite or employ
hardware breakpoints to find OEP
WinUpack Uses PUSH followed by RET for tail jump Placed in the middle of stub (Listing 18-5)
Themida
Secure packer employing anti-debugging, anti-analysis, and anti-VM techniques
Contains a kernel component making it difficult to follow Runs code continuously Use ProcDump to dump memory without attaching debugger
5. Packed DLLsSimilar to executables
Unpacking stub contained in DllMain DllMain unpacks original DLL Some debuggers execute DllMain before breaking
• Can set IMAGE_FILE_HEADER values to cause DLL to be interpreted as executable
In-class exerciseLab 18-1
Load executable in IDA Pro to identify packed code Run PEiD on binary and find section UPX2. Perform a “deep
scan”. What does PEiD return? In OllyDbg, locate the jump to the unpacking stub by finding
the register save instruction Set a breakpoint at this location and execute unpacking
code. Single-step to the OEP. Use OllyDump to dump the program into a new executable
and load the new executable in IDA Pro