part-financed by the european union (european regional development fund) agenda 1) coordinator’s...

Part-financed by the European Union (European Regional Development Fund)

AGENDA

1) Coordinator’s presentation on the draft of Action plan (time-schedule)

2) Ludwigsfelde presentation3) Kaunas city presentation4) Council of Hame presentation5) Discussion on the task of partners during the planning

period6) Remarks of Project Manager7) Conclusions


Rail Baltica Growth CorridorProject Meeting

Working package 625 November, 2011

VILNIUS

Presentation by Mr. Albertas ArūnaVGTU CCITL Project Manager


List of WP-6 partners havingthe budget line „External service”

1. City of Helsinki2. Ludwigsfelde municipality3. Latvian TDEA4. Kaunas City municipality5. City of Poznan6. City of Lodz7. VGTU CCITL


List of Partners in Wp-61) City of Helsinki

6) Regional Council of Hame

9) Regional Planning Board Havelland- flaming Ludwigsfelde municipality

12) Latvian TDEA

14) Kaunas City Municipal Administration

15) City of Warsaw

16) City of Poznan

17) City of Lodz

20) City of Bialystok

21) Marshal’s Office of the Lodz Vaivodship

13) VGTU CCITL - Vilnius

WP-6 budget

Personnel External

X X

X —

X X

X X

X X

X —

X X

X X

X —

X —

X X

Budget: 206236 128000 €


1.Workpackage 6Name: Logistics Pilot co-operability of Logistics Centres

Partners: Coordinating 13, participating 1,6,9,12,14,15,16,17,20,21

• The aim of WP-6 is to define common interoperability between existing logistics centers and intermodal terminals.

• WP-6 aims:- to harmonize services of logistics centres in the Rail

Baltica region;- to create new service product for global freight flows;- to create stakeholder-partnership model in the context

of logistics centres.


2. Who will be involved?1. The stakeholders partnership is built between all critical actors

from public and private sectors.

3. What output?

1. Improved interoperability of logistics centres and intermodal terminals in the RBGC will create potential for desing of new products within the Region.

2. Based on the harmonized network of LC (IT), joint branding and promotion activities are implemented to related markets in Asia and Europe.


4. Main activities in the WP-61. Pilot planning.

2. Creation of stakeholders partnership for development of service product.

3. Interoperability threshold and development of promotion concept.

4. Joint branding and promotion campaign.


5. Results of activities 6.1(01/2012-06/2012)

1. Pilot Expert team, consisting of the participating Partners, Pilot personnel and external experts.

2. Selected Logistics centres operate as pilot platforms for the WP-6 activities.

3. Pilot logistics centres and intermodal terminals are selected in each Rail Baltica country using WP-4 results and expertise of the Pilot Expert team.


6. Results of the activity 6.2 (01/2012-06/2012)

1. Model of the stakeholders partnership by collecting authorities and sector-specific stakeholders from private sector to plan and create a new common service model (what model?)

2. At least one service product that can be jointly promoted to the related markets (what service product?)

3. The model of partnership can be adapted by the other logistics centres of the Region (or vice versa?)


7. What background to be used?1. Basic interoperability requirements between RBGC LC

and IT will be used by Pilots as a tool to build cooperation and a joint operating concept.

2. Transnational view in the analysis brings specialization of the communication and interaction of the LC in the Rail Baltica Region.


8. What is the new service product?

1. Functional logistics centre network for the global freight flows between Asia and Europe.

2. Linking with the major transport hubs of Europe (Warsaw, Berlin), the interoperability of LC becomes the major prerequisite for the competitiveness of the route.


9. Results of the activity 6.3 (03/2012-12/2012)

1. Definition of an interoperability threshold for LC and IT of the Region (minimal requirements).

2. Analysis of the development needs for critical logistics and service infrastructure is completed.

3. The influence of the public decision-working on these critical investments is evaluated.

4. The status of the logistics centres along Rail Baltica is outlined.


10. Who will benefit from the results?1. The transport and logistics service providers.

2. Business and their customers in the Region.

3. State institutions can utilize the results for improvement of their own activities.


11.Results of the activity 6.4 (09/2012-03/2013)

1. Joint participation at logistics fairs (Munich, China)

2. Specific dissemination releases will be published (short film, etc.)

3. Promotion of Rail Baltica as integrated distribution hub in the BSR.


WP-6: Logistics pilot: Co-operation of Logistics centresCoordination: Partner 13Participating: Partners 1, 6, 9, 12, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21;

10.2011 11.2011 12.2011 01.2012 02.2012 03.2012 04.2012 05.2012 06.2012 07.2012 08.2012 09.2012 10.2012 11.2012 12.2012 01.2013 02.2013 03.2013 04.2013 05.2013 06.2013 07.2013 08.2013 09.2013

Time schedule (Project application)

A

PM-5 (Tallinn)

Final conference (Berlin)

Activities

Joint branding and promotion campaign

Implementing activities

Pilot planning and kick-off

Creation of stake holders partnership

Interoperability threshold and promotion concept

No.

Dissemination eventsPilot meeting PM-1 (Vilnius)

PM-2 (Warsaw)

PM-3 (Poznan)

PM-4 (St. Petersburg)

Fair (China)

International round table conference 1

International round table conference 2

6.4

6.3

6.2

B

6.1

M3 (13-18) M4 (19-24) M5 (25-30)

90.000 €

90.000 €

M6 (31-36)

150.000 €

15.000 €


WP-6: Logistics Pilot: Co-operability of Logistics centresActivities: 6.1, 6.2Participating: Partners 1, 6, 9, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21;

10.2011 11.2011 02.2012 03.2012 04.2012 06.2012 07.2012 08.2012 09.2012 11.2012 12.2012 01.2013 02.2013 03.2013 04.2013 05.2013 06.2013 07.2013 08.2013 09.2013

Output:1. Common service2. Model described3. International Marketing concept prepared

6.3.3 Outlining status of Logistic centres

PM5

6.3.4 Branding and promotion concept

6.3.5 Pilot meeting in Tallinn

10.2012

150.000 €

6.1.1

6.2.5

6.2.4

Operating concept new service product determination

90.000 €6.3

Interoperability threshold and promotion concept

PM4

6.3.1 Investment package demand

6.3.2 Threshold determination

PM3

11.24

12.2011 01.2012 05.2012

15.000 €

6.1.2

6.1.3

6.1.4

6.1.5

6.1.7 Pilot meeting in Warszawa

6.2.3

6.2.1

6.2.2

6.2Creation of Stake-holders partnership

Pilot meeting in Poznan

Cooperation concept drafting

Activities

Pilot planning

Pilot meeting in Vilnius

Pilot experts team creation

Determination of external service

Preparation of TOR's for ES.P

Selection of ES.P

Analysis of interoperability requirements

Pilot meeting in St. Petersburg

M6 (31-36)

Time schedule (Draft by coordinator P13) 2011.11.24

6.1

6.1.6 Pilot logistics centres selection

No. M3 (13-18) M4 (19-24) M5 (25-30)

PM2


Proposals for the discussion

1. Understanding of the content of partners participation.

2. Obligations of the partners personnel in the WP-6.3. External service demand.4. Experts team in the WP-6.

part-financed by the european union (european regional development fund) agenda 1) coordinator’s...

Documents

city of lodz

pilot logistics centres

city of poznan

city of helsinki

kaunas city presentation

city of warsaw

city of bialystok

kaunas city municipality