passive acoustic monitoring for tidal energy projects
DESCRIPTION
Passive Acoustic Monitoring for Tidal Energy Projects. Brian Polagye , Chris Bassett, and Jim Thomson University of Washington Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center. Ecological and Environmental Monitoring April 7, 2011. Evaluating Acoustic Effects. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
NNMREC
Passive Acoustic Monitoring for Tidal Energy Projects
Brian Polagye, Chris Bassett, and Jim ThomsonUniversity of Washington
Northwest National Marine Renewable Energy Center
Ecological and Environmental MonitoringApril 7, 2011
NNMREC
Evaluating Acoustic EffectsMarine Mammal Behavioral
Response to Sound
Sound Received by Marine Mammal Individual Life HistoryContext for Received
Sound
Sound generated by turbine
Site-specific sound propagation
Marine mammal hearing sensitivity
Ambient noise from other sources
Marine mammal activity state
Exposure to similar sounds
NNMREC
Quantifying Sound from Turbines
Common spectral peaks
(100 Hz – 3 kHz)
AHD at fish farm
Bedload transport
Nearby shipping
Data collected by Scottish Association of Marine Sciences
OpenHydro turbine (6 m diameter)
Drifting EARs data collection
Compare drift series to identify turbine-specific features
NNMREC
Marine Mammal Hearing Sensitivity
Southall et al. (2007) Marine mammal exposure criteria
fRfRfM
maxlog20 10
2222
22
lowhigh
high
ffffff
fR
Turbine Noise
NNMREC
Implication for Received Levels
Broadband Levels Mid-frequency Cetaceans
4x reduction in area ensonified to 120 dB
NNMREC
Stationary Hydrophone MeasurementsLoggerhead DSG
Autonomous hydrophone (32 GB capacity)
80 kHz sampling 2% duty cycle for 3 months
NNMREC
Temporal and Spatial Variability
Cumulative Probability Density
Hydrophone Deployments
Temporal variability dominates over spatial variability
NNMREC
Vessel Traffic Monitoring with AIS
Automatic Identification System (AIS) transponders required on all vessels greater than 300 tonnes gross weight and passenger vessels
Continuous data collection and archiving
NNMREC
Data Assimilation
SPL (
dB re
1 μ
Pa)
Distance to closest vessel (km)
Vessel Proximity Noise Correlation
Vessel noise drives broadband noise levels
Source: Chris Bassett, forthcoming PhD dissertation
NNMREC
Implication for Evaluating Noise Effects
NNMREC
Sound during High Currents
Hydrophone Response
Current Velocity
NNMREC
Flow Shield Experiment
Hydrophonewith Flow Shield
Unshielded Hydrophone
Doppler VelocimeterSample volume aligned with
hydrophone element
High Velocity Region
Quiescent Region
High Porosity Foam
Hydrophone Element
Hydrophone Pressure Case
Source: Chris Bassett, forthcoming PhD dissertation
NNMREC
Pseudo-Sound Identification
Unshielded Hydrophone
Hydrophone with
Flow Shield
Source: Chris Bassett, forthcoming PhD dissertation
NNMREC
Propagating Sound during High Currents Bedload transport
― Elevated noise at 5-50 kHz― Consistent with size of gravel and shell hash
observed during ROV surveys; O(1 cm)
Turbulent flow over rough surfaces― Potential contribution from advected turbulence― Cannot measure velocity fluctuations directly at
frequencies of interest (e.g., > 300 Hz)
88.0
209D
f (Hz) (Thorne, 1986)
Source: Chris Bassett, forthcoming PhD dissertation
NNMREC
Measuring Noise from Tidal TurbinesParameter Stationary
HydrophoneDrifting Hydrophone
Pseudo-Noise Filtering Physical shield Inherent filteringMeasurement Duration Months HoursDeployment Depth Seabed or
Turbine frameVariable (easiest near surface)
Spatial Resolution Low HighTemporal Resolution High Low
Long-term, low-intensity monitoring
Short-term, spatial characterization
NNMREC
Thank YouThis material is based upon work supported
by the Department of Energy and Snohomish County PUD under Award
Number DE-0002654.
Joe Talbert for keeping all equipment in working order.
Sam Gooch, Joe Graber, and Alex DeKlerk for helping turn around instrumentation.
Captains Andy Reay-Ellers for piloting skills during instrumentation deployment.