patrons of the association

8
J. Cotton Res. Dev. 35(1), 50-57 (January, 2021) ISSN No. 0972-8619 ABSTRACT: The experimental work comprising of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance as well as correlation and path analysis study for 16 traits in thirty four genotypes of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was carried out during winter 2017 at (TNAU) Research Farm of Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur. The genotypic differences were significant for all the traits. The variability studies indicated that high estimate of phenotypic coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant and high heritability and high genetic advance was observed for lint index and bundle strength The correlation study revealed that lint yield had highly significant and positive correlation with plant height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll weight and uniformity index and significant association with seed index. Path analysis revealed that uniformity index exhibited maximum positive direct effects on lint yield followed by seed index, bolls/plant, and also uniformity index exhibited significant and positive indirect effect on lint yield via plant height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index and lint index. Hence selection for these traits would be quite effective to improve the lint yield yield. Key words: Association analysis, cotton, heritability, lint yield Studies on genetic variability, direct and indirect effect for seed cotton yield, its contributing characters and fibre properties in upland cotton M. GNANASEKARAN*, K. THIYAGU AND M. GUNASEKARAN Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur - 626 135 *Email: [email protected] Cotton ( ), is the world's Gossypium spp. most utilized natural textile fibre and global textile industry depends largely on natural fibre. Majority of plant trichomes are multi-cellular, but spp. produce unicellular seed Gossypium trichomes known as fibre, making cotton the leading cash crop with significant economic and social impact on Indian economy (Boopathi et al., 2011). Improving cotton fibre quality and lint yield remains challenging for cotton breeders. The success of any breeding programme depends on the spectrum of genetic variability present in the population. The major target of cotton breeding in the world has been to improve fibre yield and quality. Remarkable advances in cotton yield and quality improvement has been recorded by conventional and molecular approaches in the last few decades. Yield potential is reportedly plateau due to complex and antagonistic genetic relationship among the cultivated species. For instance, continuous incorporation of genes and selection from the same breeding stock of cultivated species has resulted in narrow genetic base for most of the elite types which is a major bottleneck for cotton breeding, cultivation and production. Selection changes the genetic structure of population due to preservation of superior alleles and discarding the undesirable alleles (Budak ., 2004). Often the selection is et al based solely on phenotypic expression which is often misleading because of the influence of environment. Therefore, information on phenotypic, genotypic and environmental variability is of great importance for effective selection. However, genotypic coefficient of variation does not give an exact idea on the total heritable variation. According to Magadum . et al (2012), the relative amount of heritable variation could be assessed by heritability. To account for the proportion of phenotypic variance attributable to genetic variance, heritability will have to be estimated. This is vital as it also provides the basis for effective selection. Magadum (2012) also pointed out that et al., genetic variability along with heritability of a character will indicate the possibility and extent

Upload: others

Post on 20-Oct-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 35(1), 50-57 (January, 2021) ISSN No. 0972-8619

ABSTRACT: The experimental work comprising of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance as well as

correlation and path analysis study for 16 traits in thirty four genotypes of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was

carried out during winter 2017 at (TNAU) Research Farm of Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur. The genotypic

differences were significant for all the traits. The variability studies indicated that high estimate of phenotypic

coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant and high

heritability and high genetic advance was observed for lint index and bundle strength The correlation study

revealed that lint yield had highly significant and positive correlation with plant height, sympodia/plant,

bolls/plant, boll weight and uniformity index and significant association with seed index. Path analysis revealed

that uniformity index exhibited maximum positive direct effects on lint yield followed by seed index, bolls/plant,

and also uniformity index exhibited significant and positive indirect effect on lint yield via plant height,

sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index and lint index. Hence selection for these traits would be quite

effective to improve the lint yield yield.

Key words: Association analysis, cotton, heritability, lint yield

Studies on genetic variability, direct and indirect effect for seed cotton yield, its contributing characters and fibre properties in upland cotton

M. GNANASEKARAN*, K. THIYAGU AND M. GUNASEKARAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur - 626 135

*Email: [email protected]

Cotton ( ), is the world's Gossypium spp.

most utilized natural textile fibre and global

textile industry depends largely on natural fibre.

Majority of plant trichomes are multi-cellular,

but spp. produce unicellular seed Gossypium

trichomes known as fibre, making cotton the

leading cash crop with significant economic and

social impact on Indian economy (Boopathi et al.,

2011). Improving cotton fibre quality and lint

yield remains challenging for cotton breeders.

The success of any breeding programme depends

on the spectrum of genetic variability present in

the population. The major target of cotton

breeding in the world has been to improve fibre

yield and quality. Remarkable advances in cotton

yield and quality improvement has been recorded

by conventional and molecular approaches in the

last few decades. Yield potential is reportedly

plateau due to complex and antagonistic genetic

relationship among the cultivated species. For

instance, continuous incorporation of genes and

selection from the same breeding stock of

cultivated species has resulted in narrow genetic

base for most of the elite types which is a major

bottleneck for cotton breeding, cultivation and

production. Selection changes the genetic

structure of population due to preservation of

superior alleles and discarding the undesirable

alleles (Budak ., 2004). Often the selection is et al

based solely on phenotypic expression which is

often misleading because of the influence of

environment. Therefore, information on

phenotypic, genotypic and environmental

variability is of great importance for effective

selection. However, genotypic coefficient of

variation does not give an exact idea on the total

heritable variation. According to Magadum . et al

(2012), the relative amount of heritable variation

could be assessed by heritability. To account for

the proport ion of phenotypic variance

attributable to genetic variance, heritability will

have to be estimated. This is vital as it also

provides the basis for effective selection.

Magadum (2012) also pointed out that et al.,

genetic variability along with heritability of a

character will indicate the possibility and extent

to which improvement is feasible through

selection on phenotypic basis. Heritability value

alone may not provide clear predictability of the

breeding value (Mishra 2015). Hence, et al.,

combination with genetic advance over means is

more effective and reliable in predicting the

resultant effect of selection (Ramanjinappa ., et al

2011). In the presence of high amount of genetic

variability, knowledge on heritability and genetic

advance helps the breeder to exercise selection

on the desired characters to achieve the objective

quickly. Therefore, for improvement of target trait

in any crop, it is necessary to have full

information on the variability, heritability and

genetic advance. Further, efficiency of selection

in any breeding programme mainly depends

upon the knowledge of association of the

characters. Phenotypic correlation indicated the

extent of the relation between two characters

while genotypic correlation provides an estimate

of inherent association between the genes

controlling them. The cause for negative effect of

the trait is very essential for formulating selection

indices by path analysis (Rao, 2001; et al.,

Kaushik, 2003; Gururajan and Sunder, et al.,

2004; Gite 2006). Hence the present study et al.,

was planned to assess the variability, correlation

and path analysis for various yield and yield

contributing characters in a set of genotypes.

Such information may be fruitful in formulating

efficient selection programme for synthesis and

development of new cotton genotypes with

improved yield and its contributing traits.

The research experiment was conducted

at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Research

Farm of Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur,

during the winter 2017. The mean maximum and

minimum temperature of this region is 37.2˚C to

25.5˚C and an annual rainfall is 818.8 mm. The

experimental site is located at 9” 5'N latitude, 77”

6'E longitudes and an altitude of 137.92m above

mean sea level. The crop has grown in sandy clay

loam soil texture with pH of 8.2. The

experimental material comprised of thirty four

improved G.hirsutum cultures received from

various research institutes under AICRP on

cotton. Thirty four cotton cultures were raised in

a randomized block design with three

replications. Two rows per each entry were sown

at a spacing of 90x45cm. Standard procedure for

field maintenance was adhered to; basic

agronomic practices like irrigation, fertilizer

application, weeds and pest control were

practiced. Data were recorded from five selected

plants in each entry for twelve characters viz.,

Days to first flowering (DFF), Days to fifty per cent

f l owe r ing (DFPF ) , P l an t he i gh t ( PH ) ,

Monopodia/plant (M/P), Sympodia/plant (Sy/P),

Bolls/plant (B/P), Boll weight (BW), Seed index

(SI), Lint index (LI), Ginning percentage (GP),

Upper Half Mean Length (UHML), Bundle

strength (BS), Fibre fineness (FF), Uniformity

index (UI), Seed cotton yield (kg/ha) (SCY) and

Lint yield (kg/ha) (LY). Seed cotton was pooled

from the sampled plants, ginned and the lint

obtained was evaluated for fibre quality

characters estimation using High Volume

Instrument 900 classic. Mean data were

subjected to genetic variability, correlation and

path analysis. Information on the nature and

magnitude of variability for both quantitative and

qualitative traits in any crop species plays a vital

role in formulating an effective breeding

programme and its success. Superior genotypes

can be isolated by selection if considerable

genetic variation exists within the population.

The success in breeding programme for economic

traits, which are controlled by polygenes and

highly influenced by environment, depends on

nature and magnitude of their genotypic

variability. It is therefore essential to partition the

overall variability into heritable and non-

heritable components. Knowledge on the

magnitude of heritability coupled with nature

and extent of variability, association, direct and

indirect effect of yield attributing traits in the

breeding material gives an idea for effective

genetic improvement through selection.

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect 51

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 2: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 35(1), 50-57 (January, 2021) ISSN No. 0972-8619

ABSTRACT: The experimental work comprising of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance as well as

correlation and path analysis study for 16 traits in thirty four genotypes of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) was

carried out during winter 2017 at (TNAU) Research Farm of Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur. The genotypic

differences were significant for all the traits. The variability studies indicated that high estimate of phenotypic

coefficient of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant and high

heritability and high genetic advance was observed for lint index and bundle strength The correlation study

revealed that lint yield had highly significant and positive correlation with plant height, sympodia/plant,

bolls/plant, boll weight and uniformity index and significant association with seed index. Path analysis revealed

that uniformity index exhibited maximum positive direct effects on lint yield followed by seed index, bolls/plant,

and also uniformity index exhibited significant and positive indirect effect on lint yield via plant height,

sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index and lint index. Hence selection for these traits would be quite

effective to improve the lint yield yield.

Key words: Association analysis, cotton, heritability, lint yield

Studies on genetic variability, direct and indirect effect for seed cotton yield, its contributing characters and fibre properties in upland cotton

M. GNANASEKARAN*, K. THIYAGU AND M. GUNASEKARAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur - 626 135

*Email: [email protected]

Cotton ( ), is the world's Gossypium spp.

most utilized natural textile fibre and global

textile industry depends largely on natural fibre.

Majority of plant trichomes are multi-cellular,

but spp. produce unicellular seed Gossypium

trichomes known as fibre, making cotton the

leading cash crop with significant economic and

social impact on Indian economy (Boopathi et al.,

2011). Improving cotton fibre quality and lint

yield remains challenging for cotton breeders.

The success of any breeding programme depends

on the spectrum of genetic variability present in

the population. The major target of cotton

breeding in the world has been to improve fibre

yield and quality. Remarkable advances in cotton

yield and quality improvement has been recorded

by conventional and molecular approaches in the

last few decades. Yield potential is reportedly

plateau due to complex and antagonistic genetic

relationship among the cultivated species. For

instance, continuous incorporation of genes and

selection from the same breeding stock of

cultivated species has resulted in narrow genetic

base for most of the elite types which is a major

bottleneck for cotton breeding, cultivation and

production. Selection changes the genetic

structure of population due to preservation of

superior alleles and discarding the undesirable

alleles (Budak ., 2004). Often the selection is et al

based solely on phenotypic expression which is

often misleading because of the influence of

environment. Therefore, information on

phenotypic, genotypic and environmental

variability is of great importance for effective

selection. However, genotypic coefficient of

variation does not give an exact idea on the total

heritable variation. According to Magadum . et al

(2012), the relative amount of heritable variation

could be assessed by heritability. To account for

the proport ion of phenotypic variance

attributable to genetic variance, heritability will

have to be estimated. This is vital as it also

provides the basis for effective selection.

Magadum (2012) also pointed out that et al.,

genetic variability along with heritability of a

character will indicate the possibility and extent

to which improvement is feasible through

selection on phenotypic basis. Heritability value

alone may not provide clear predictability of the

breeding value (Mishra 2015). Hence, et al.,

combination with genetic advance over means is

more effective and reliable in predicting the

resultant effect of selection (Ramanjinappa ., et al

2011). In the presence of high amount of genetic

variability, knowledge on heritability and genetic

advance helps the breeder to exercise selection

on the desired characters to achieve the objective

quickly. Therefore, for improvement of target trait

in any crop, it is necessary to have full

information on the variability, heritability and

genetic advance. Further, efficiency of selection

in any breeding programme mainly depends

upon the knowledge of association of the

characters. Phenotypic correlation indicated the

extent of the relation between two characters

while genotypic correlation provides an estimate

of inherent association between the genes

controlling them. The cause for negative effect of

the trait is very essential for formulating selection

indices by path analysis (Rao, 2001; et al.,

Kaushik, 2003; Gururajan and Sunder, et al.,

2004; Gite 2006). Hence the present study et al.,

was planned to assess the variability, correlation

and path analysis for various yield and yield

contributing characters in a set of genotypes.

Such information may be fruitful in formulating

efficient selection programme for synthesis and

development of new cotton genotypes with

improved yield and its contributing traits.

The research experiment was conducted

at Tamil Nadu Agricultural University Research

Farm of Cotton Research Station, Srivilliputtur,

during the winter 2017. The mean maximum and

minimum temperature of this region is 37.2˚C to

25.5˚C and an annual rainfall is 818.8 mm. The

experimental site is located at 9” 5'N latitude, 77”

6'E longitudes and an altitude of 137.92m above

mean sea level. The crop has grown in sandy clay

loam soil texture with pH of 8.2. The

experimental material comprised of thirty four

improved G.hirsutum cultures received from

various research institutes under AICRP on

cotton. Thirty four cotton cultures were raised in

a randomized block design with three

replications. Two rows per each entry were sown

at a spacing of 90x45cm. Standard procedure for

field maintenance was adhered to; basic

agronomic practices like irrigation, fertilizer

application, weeds and pest control were

practiced. Data were recorded from five selected

plants in each entry for twelve characters viz.,

Days to first flowering (DFF), Days to fifty per cent

f l owe r ing (DFPF ) , P l an t he i gh t ( PH ) ,

Monopodia/plant (M/P), Sympodia/plant (Sy/P),

Bolls/plant (B/P), Boll weight (BW), Seed index

(SI), Lint index (LI), Ginning percentage (GP),

Upper Half Mean Length (UHML), Bundle

strength (BS), Fibre fineness (FF), Uniformity

index (UI), Seed cotton yield (kg/ha) (SCY) and

Lint yield (kg/ha) (LY). Seed cotton was pooled

from the sampled plants, ginned and the lint

obtained was evaluated for fibre quality

characters estimation using High Volume

Instrument 900 classic. Mean data were

subjected to genetic variability, correlation and

path analysis. Information on the nature and

magnitude of variability for both quantitative and

qualitative traits in any crop species plays a vital

role in formulating an effective breeding

programme and its success. Superior genotypes

can be isolated by selection if considerable

genetic variation exists within the population.

The success in breeding programme for economic

traits, which are controlled by polygenes and

highly influenced by environment, depends on

nature and magnitude of their genotypic

variability. It is therefore essential to partition the

overall variability into heritable and non-

heritable components. Knowledge on the

magnitude of heritability coupled with nature

and extent of variability, association, direct and

indirect effect of yield attributing traits in the

breeding material gives an idea for effective

genetic improvement through selection.

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect 51

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 3: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

Analysis of variance revealed significant

differences among all genotypes for all the traits.

Estimates of genetic variability (Table 1 and Fig. 1.)

revealed high estimate of phenotypic coefficient of

variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of

variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant (53.10 and

27.58%) whereas, moderate estimates of PCV and

GCV were estimated for traits like bundle strength

(11.05 and 11.05%), uniformity index (18.79 and

16.13%) and lint yield (17.69 and 15.77%).

Moderate PCV and low GCV was observed the

traits like bolls/plant (10.81 and 8.34) and seed

index (10.17 and 7.67%). Days to first flowering

(3.11 and 2.57%), days to fifty per cent flowering

(2.42 and 1.69%), plant height (7.12 and 6.72%),

sympodia/plant (7.86 and 5.27%), boll weight

(9.59% and 6.34%), lint index ((9.70 and 8.77%),

ginning percentage (5.70 and 3.65%), seed cotton

yield (7.42 and 7.42%), upper half men length

(8.77%, 8.77), fibre fineness (1.05 and 1.05%)

exhibited low PCV and GCV indicated that these

characters were h igh ly in f luenced by

environmental factors. The phenotypic co- efficient

of variation which measures total variation was

found to be greater than genotypic coefficient of

variation for all the characters except upper half

mean length, bundle strength and fibre fineness,

indicated some degree of environmental influence

on the traits. Selection for improvement of such

traits may sometimes be misleading. These

findings were also supported by Santoshkumar et

al., (2012), Pujer et. al., 2014, Sunayana et al.,

2017, Gnanasekaran et al., 2018 and Praveen

Sampath Kumar et al., (2019).

The estimates of high heritability value

was noticed for days to first flowering (68.70%),

plant height (88.90%), lint index (81.72%), seed

cotton yield (99.89%), upper half mean length

(100.0%), bundle strength (100.0%), fibre

fineness (100.0%), uniformity index (73.65%)

and lint yield (79.48). These findings were in

accordance with previous reports by Gnanasekaran

Table 1. Genetic components of variance for various traits

Traits PCV GCV h2 GA GAM

DFF 3.11 2.57 68.70 1.17 2.17

DFPF 2.42 1.69 49.19 0.71 1.22

PH 7.12 6.72 88.90 1.73 1.65

M/P 53.10 27.58 26.97 0.29 37.93

Sy/P 7.86 5.27 44.91 0.62 4.26

B/P 10.81 8.34 59.55 0.95 3.70

BW 9.59 6.34 43.81 0.60 15.02

SI 10.17 7.67 56.96 0.89 9.22

LI 9.70 8.77 81.72 1.52 28.03

GP 5.70 3.65 41.07 0.54 1.50

SCY 7.42 7.42 99.89 2.06 7.16

UHML 8.77 8.77 100.00 2.06 6.37

BS 11.05 11.05 100.00 2.06 51.00

FF 1.05 1.05 100.00 2.06 2.49

UI 18.79 16.13 73.65 1.30 0.17

LY 17.69 15.77 79.48 1.46 0.07

Fig. 1 : Genetic components of variance for variouis traits

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

Table

2.

Gen

oty

pic

corr

ela

tion

s for

vari

ou

s e

con

om

ic t

rait

s

Tra

its

DF

F

DFPF

PH

M

/P

Sy/P

B/P

BW

S

I LI

GP

SC

Y

UH

ML

BS

FF

UI

LY

DF

F

1.0

00

0.9

69**

-0

.119

0.3

62*

-0.0

90

-0.1

19

0.0

23

0.3

02

0.1

22

-0.2

05

0.1

16

0.2

28

-0.0

79

0.1

56

-0.2

05

-0.1

60

DF

PF

1.0

00

-0.3

21

0.2

56

-0.2

39

-0.4

49**

-0

.087

0.1

43

-0.0

23

-0.2

22

0.0

49

0.1

62

-0.1

81

0.0

68

-0.4

05*

-0.3

62*

PH

1.0

00

-0.2

51

0.9

15**

0.8

01**

0.4

09*

0.1

93

-0.0

03

-0.2

74

0.0

32

0.0

18

0.2

38

0.0

56

0.5

95**

0.6

73**

M/P

1.0

00

-0.3

73*

0.0

11

0.0

79

0.3

89*

0.2

09

-0.1

76

0.0

00

-0.0

23

0.0

49

-0.0

83

-0.0

35

-0.0

11

Sy/P

1.0

00

0.6

55**

0.6

55**

0.3

88*

0.2

26

-0.1

82

0.1

19

0.0

15

0.2

08

0.1

04

0.5

00**

0.5

61**

B/P

1.0

00

0.5

28**

0.1

77

0.0

81

-0.1

08

-0.0

53

0.0

49

0.2

03

0.0

00

0.7

78**

0.8

15**

BW

1.0

00

0.6

31**

0.5

48**

-0

.004

0.1

39

0.4

72**

0.2

30

0.1

47

0.5

30**

0.5

44**

SI

1.0

00

0.7

51**

-0

.155

0.5

29**

0.6

10**

0.1

49

0.5

00**

0.2

98

0.3

33*

LI

1.0

00

0.5

35**

0.2

16

0.3

59*

0.3

00

0.2

43

0.3

76*

0.2

50

GP

1.0

00

-0.3

39*

-0.2

39

0.2

63

-0.2

63

0.1

57

-0.0

75

SC

Y

1.0

00

0.7

05**

-0

.090

0.9

27**

-0

.191

-0.1

16

UH

ML

1.0

00

0.0

26

0.7

74**

0.1

02

0.1

55

BS

1.0

00

0.0

03

0.0

33

-0.0

28

FF

1.0

00

-0.1

15

-0.0

62

UI

1.0

00

0.9

73**

LY

1.0

00

* S

ign

ific

an

t at

5%

level;**

Sig

nific

an

t at

1%

level

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect 52 53

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 4: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

Analysis of variance revealed significant

differences among all genotypes for all the traits.

Estimates of genetic variability (Table 1 and Fig. 1.)

revealed high estimate of phenotypic coefficient of

variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of

variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant (53.10 and

27.58%) whereas, moderate estimates of PCV and

GCV were estimated for traits like bundle strength

(11.05 and 11.05%), uniformity index (18.79 and

16.13%) and lint yield (17.69 and 15.77%).

Moderate PCV and low GCV was observed the

traits like bolls/plant (10.81 and 8.34) and seed

index (10.17 and 7.67%). Days to first flowering

(3.11 and 2.57%), days to fifty per cent flowering

(2.42 and 1.69%), plant height (7.12 and 6.72%),

sympodia/plant (7.86 and 5.27%), boll weight

(9.59% and 6.34%), lint index ((9.70 and 8.77%),

ginning percentage (5.70 and 3.65%), seed cotton

yield (7.42 and 7.42%), upper half men length

(8.77%, 8.77), fibre fineness (1.05 and 1.05%)

exhibited low PCV and GCV indicated that these

characters were h igh ly in f luenced by

environmental factors. The phenotypic co- efficient

of variation which measures total variation was

found to be greater than genotypic coefficient of

variation for all the characters except upper half

mean length, bundle strength and fibre fineness,

indicated some degree of environmental influence

on the traits. Selection for improvement of such

traits may sometimes be misleading. These

findings were also supported by Santoshkumar et

al., (2012), Pujer et. al., 2014, Sunayana et al.,

2017, Gnanasekaran et al., 2018 and Praveen

Sampath Kumar et al., (2019).

The estimates of high heritability value

was noticed for days to first flowering (68.70%),

plant height (88.90%), lint index (81.72%), seed

cotton yield (99.89%), upper half mean length

(100.0%), bundle strength (100.0%), fibre

fineness (100.0%), uniformity index (73.65%)

and lint yield (79.48). These findings were in

accordance with previous reports by Gnanasekaran

Table 1. Genetic components of variance for various traits

Traits PCV GCV h2 GA GAM

DFF 3.11 2.57 68.70 1.17 2.17

DFPF 2.42 1.69 49.19 0.71 1.22

PH 7.12 6.72 88.90 1.73 1.65

M/P 53.10 27.58 26.97 0.29 37.93

Sy/P 7.86 5.27 44.91 0.62 4.26

B/P 10.81 8.34 59.55 0.95 3.70

BW 9.59 6.34 43.81 0.60 15.02

SI 10.17 7.67 56.96 0.89 9.22

LI 9.70 8.77 81.72 1.52 28.03

GP 5.70 3.65 41.07 0.54 1.50

SCY 7.42 7.42 99.89 2.06 7.16

UHML 8.77 8.77 100.00 2.06 6.37

BS 11.05 11.05 100.00 2.06 51.00

FF 1.05 1.05 100.00 2.06 2.49

UI 18.79 16.13 73.65 1.30 0.17

LY 17.69 15.77 79.48 1.46 0.07

Fig. 1 : Genetic components of variance for variouis traits

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

Table

2.

Gen

oty

pic

corr

ela

tion

s for

vari

ou

s e

con

om

ic t

rait

s

Tra

its

DF

F

DFPF

PH

M

/P

Sy/P

B/P

BW

S

I LI

GP

SC

Y

UH

ML

BS

FF

UI

LY

DF

F

1.0

00

0.9

69**

-0

.119

0.3

62*

-0.0

90

-0.1

19

0.0

23

0.3

02

0.1

22

-0.2

05

0.1

16

0.2

28

-0.0

79

0.1

56

-0.2

05

-0.1

60

DF

PF

1.0

00

-0.3

21

0.2

56

-0.2

39

-0.4

49**

-0

.087

0.1

43

-0.0

23

-0.2

22

0.0

49

0.1

62

-0.1

81

0.0

68

-0.4

05*

-0.3

62*

PH

1.0

00

-0.2

51

0.9

15**

0.8

01**

0.4

09*

0.1

93

-0.0

03

-0.2

74

0.0

32

0.0

18

0.2

38

0.0

56

0.5

95**

0.6

73**

M/P

1.0

00

-0.3

73*

0.0

11

0.0

79

0.3

89*

0.2

09

-0.1

76

0.0

00

-0.0

23

0.0

49

-0.0

83

-0.0

35

-0.0

11

Sy/P

1.0

00

0.6

55**

0.6

55**

0.3

88*

0.2

26

-0.1

82

0.1

19

0.0

15

0.2

08

0.1

04

0.5

00**

0.5

61**

B/P

1.0

00

0.5

28**

0.1

77

0.0

81

-0.1

08

-0.0

53

0.0

49

0.2

03

0.0

00

0.7

78**

0.8

15**

BW

1.0

00

0.6

31**

0.5

48**

-0

.004

0.1

39

0.4

72**

0.2

30

0.1

47

0.5

30**

0.5

44**

SI

1.0

00

0.7

51**

-0

.155

0.5

29**

0.6

10**

0.1

49

0.5

00**

0.2

98

0.3

33*

LI

1.0

00

0.5

35**

0.2

16

0.3

59*

0.3

00

0.2

43

0.3

76*

0.2

50

GP

1.0

00

-0.3

39*

-0.2

39

0.2

63

-0.2

63

0.1

57

-0.0

75

SC

Y

1.0

00

0.7

05**

-0

.090

0.9

27**

-0

.191

-0.1

16

UH

ML

1.0

00

0.0

26

0.7

74**

0.1

02

0.1

55

BS

1.0

00

0.0

03

0.0

33

-0.0

28

FF

1.0

00

-0.1

15

-0.0

62

UI

1.0

00

0.9

73**

LY

1.0

00

* S

ign

ific

an

t at

5%

level;**

Sig

nific

an

t at

1%

level

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect 52 53

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 5: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

Table

3.

Dir

ect

effects

(dia

gon

al) a

nd in

dir

ect

effects

(off d

iagon

al) o

f econ

om

ic t

rait

s o

n s

eed c

ott

on

yie

ld a

t gen

oty

pic

level

Tra

its

DF

F

DFPF

PH

M

/P

Sy/P

B/P

BW

S

I LI

GP

SC

Y

UH

ML

BS

FF

UI

LY

DF

F

-0.0

30

0.0

38

0.0

02

-0.0

11

-0.0

01

-0.0

05

0.0

00

0.0

72

-0.0

32

0.0

11

0.0

04

0.0

03

0.0

00

-0.0

10

-0.2

03

-0.1

60

DF

PF

-0

.029

0.0

39

0.0

05

-0.0

08

-0.0

03

-0.0

20

0.0

01

0.0

34

0.0

06

0.0

12

0.0

02

0.0

02

0.0

00

-0.0

04

-0.4

00

-0.3

62*

PH

0.0

04

-0.0

13

-0.0

16

0.0

07

0.0

10

0.0

35

-0.0

03

0.0

46

0.0

01

0.0

15

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

00

-0.0

04

0.5

88

0.6

73**

M/P

-0.0

11

0.0

10

0.0

04

-0.0

29

-0.0

04

0.0

01

-0.0

01

0.0

93

-0.0

54

0.0

10

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

05

-0.0

34

-0.0

11

Sy/P

0.0

03

-0.0

09

-0.0

14

0.0

11

0.0

11

0.0

29

-0.0

05

0.0

93

-0.0

59

0.0

10

0.0

05

0.0

00

0.0

00

-0.0

07

0.4

94

0.5

61**

B/P

0.0

04

-0.0

18

-0.0

13

0.0

00

0.0

07

0.0

44

-0.0

04

0.0

42

-0.0

21

0.0

06

-0.0

02

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.7

69

0.8

15**

BW

-0

.001

-0.0

03

-0.0

06

-0.0

02

0.0

07

0.0

23

-0.0

08

0.1

51

-0.1

43

0.0

00

0.0

05

0.0

06

0.0

00

-0.0

09

0.5

24

0.5

44**

SI

-0.0

09

0.0

06

-0.0

03

-0.0

11

0.0

04

0.0

08

-0.0

05

0.2

39

-0.1

95

0.0

09

0.0

20

0.0

08

0.0

00

-0.0

32

0.2

95

0.3

33*

LI

-0.0

04

-0.0

01

0.0

00

-0.0

06

0.0

03

0.0

04

-0.0

04

0.1

80

-0.2

60

-0.0

30

0.0

08

0.0

04

0.0

00

-0.0

15

0.3

72

0.2

50

GP

0.0

06

-0.0

09

0.0

04

0.0

05

-0.0

02

-0.0

05

0.0

00

-0.0

37

-0.1

39

-0.0

55

-0.0

13

-0.0

03

0.0

00

0.0

17

0.1

56

-0.0

75

SC

Y

-0.0

03

0.0

02

-0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

01

-0.0

02

-0.0

01

0.1

27

-0.0

56

0.0

19

0.0

38

0.0

09

0.0

00

-0.0

59

-0.1

89

-0.1

16

UH

ML

-0.0

07

0.0

06

0.0

00

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

02

-0.0

04

0.1

46

-0.0

93

0.0

13

0.0

27

0.0

12

0.0

00

-0.0

49

0.1

00

0.1

55

BS

0.0

02

-0.0

07

-0.0

04

-0.0

01

0.0

02

0.0

09

-0.0

02

0.0

36

-0.0

78

-0.0

15

-0.0

03

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

33

-0.0

28

FF

-0

.005

0.0

03

-0.0

01

0.0

02

0.0

01

0.0

00

-0.0

01

0.1

20

-0.0

63

0.0

15

0.0

35

0.0

10

0.0

00

-0.0

63

-0.1

14

-0.0

62

UI

0.0

06

-0.0

16

-0.0

09

0.0

01

0.0

06

0.0

34

-0.0

04

0.0

71

-0.0

98

-0.0

09

-0.0

07

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

07

0.9

89

0.9

73**

Resid

ual E

ffect:

0.0

088

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

et al., et al., (2018) and Praveen Sampath Kumar

(2019) for plant height, seed cotton yield, upper

half mean length, and bundle strength and

Sunayana (2017) for days to first flowering et al.,

and lint index.

High heritability and high genetic advance

over the mean was observed for lint index (81.72

and 28.03%) and bundle strength (100.0 and

51.00%) indicated that most likely the heritability

is due to additive gene effect and improvement of

these traits can be made through direct phenotypic

selection. Similar result was reported by

Santoshkumar (2012). The traits days to first et al.,

flowering (68.70 and 2.17%), plant height (88.90

and 1.65%), seed cotton yield (99.89 and 7.16%),

upper half mean length (100.0 and 6.37%), fibre

fineness (100.0 and 2.49%), uniformity index

(73.65 and 0.17%) and lint yield (79.48 and

0.07%) had high heritability accompanied by low

genetic advance indicated the effect of non additive

gene action and hence heterosis breeding may be

rewarding for these traits. Similar results were

reported by Gnanasekaran (2018) for plant et al.,

height, and Pujer (2014) for uniformity index, et al.,

Santoshkumar (2012) for days to first et al.,

flowering, plant height, seed cotton yield and upper

half mean length.

The genotypic correlation co-efficient

between yield and its components were

presented in Table 2. Lint yield had highly

significant and positive correlation with

characters p lant he ight (0 .673) , v iz . ,

sympodia/plant (0.561), bolls/plant (0.815), boll

weight (0.544) and uniformity index (0.973) and

significant and positive correlation with seed

index (0.333). It indicated that increase in one

trait will simultaneously increase in the other.

Lint yield plant was having significant but /

negative association with days to fifty per cent

flowering (-0.362) and having non-significant

association with days to first flowering (-0.160),

monopodia/plant (-0.011), lint index (0.250),

ginning percentage (-0.075), seed cotton yield (-

0.116), upper half mean length (0.155), bundle

strength (-0.028) and fibre fineness (-0.062).

Such positive association of lint yield with these

traits was also observed by Sunayana et al.,

(2017) for plant height, boll plant, boll weight, /

seed index and negative non significant ginning

percentage. Efrem , (2014) reported the et al.

significant and positive correlation for plant

height, bolls/plant and boll weight. Hence, plant

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/ plant, boll weight

and seed index had significant positive

association with lint yield indicating the

existence of true relationship among these

characters and their exploitation in selection

programmes.

Considering inter-correlation among the

yield contributing traits studied, plant height

exhibited significant and positive correlation

with bolls/plant, boll weight and uniformity

index whereas sympodia/plant showed

significant positive association with bolls/plant,

boll weight, seed index and uniformity index.

Bolls/plant registered a positive and significant

correlation with boll weight and uniformity index

were as boll weight showed significant positive

association with seed index, lint index, upper

half mean length and uniformity index. Seed

index exhibited positive significant correlation

with lint index, seed cotton yield, upper half

mean length and fibre fineness. These results

clearly indicated that selection for any one of

these traits lead to concurrent improvement of

other traits as well as seed cotton yield and lint

yield. Among the fibre quality traits, upper half

mean length had significant positive association

with fibre fineness. The association between yield

components and fibre parameters revealed

significant positive association of plant height,

sympodia/plant, bolls/plant and seed index with

fibre fineness; boll weight and seed index with upper

half mean length indicated that these important

yield contributing traits were good indicators of fibre

properties improvement. Negative correlations

between yield and quality traits were observed and

make the selection procedure difficult where both

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect54 55

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 6: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

Table

3.

Dir

ect

effects

(dia

gon

al) a

nd in

dir

ect

effects

(off d

iagon

al) o

f econ

om

ic t

rait

s o

n s

eed c

ott

on

yie

ld a

t gen

oty

pic

level

Tra

its

DF

F

DFPF

PH

M

/P

Sy/P

B/P

BW

S

I LI

GP

SC

Y

UH

ML

BS

FF

UI

LY

DF

F

-0.0

30

0.0

38

0.0

02

-0.0

11

-0.0

01

-0.0

05

0.0

00

0.0

72

-0.0

32

0.0

11

0.0

04

0.0

03

0.0

00

-0.0

10

-0.2

03

-0.1

60

DF

PF

-0

.029

0.0

39

0.0

05

-0.0

08

-0.0

03

-0.0

20

0.0

01

0.0

34

0.0

06

0.0

12

0.0

02

0.0

02

0.0

00

-0.0

04

-0.4

00

-0.3

62*

PH

0.0

04

-0.0

13

-0.0

16

0.0

07

0.0

10

0.0

35

-0.0

03

0.0

46

0.0

01

0.0

15

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

00

-0.0

04

0.5

88

0.6

73**

M/P

-0.0

11

0.0

10

0.0

04

-0.0

29

-0.0

04

0.0

01

-0.0

01

0.0

93

-0.0

54

0.0

10

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

05

-0.0

34

-0.0

11

Sy/P

0.0

03

-0.0

09

-0.0

14

0.0

11

0.0

11

0.0

29

-0.0

05

0.0

93

-0.0

59

0.0

10

0.0

05

0.0

00

0.0

00

-0.0

07

0.4

94

0.5

61**

B/P

0.0

04

-0.0

18

-0.0

13

0.0

00

0.0

07

0.0

44

-0.0

04

0.0

42

-0.0

21

0.0

06

-0.0

02

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.7

69

0.8

15**

BW

-0

.001

-0.0

03

-0.0

06

-0.0

02

0.0

07

0.0

23

-0.0

08

0.1

51

-0.1

43

0.0

00

0.0

05

0.0

06

0.0

00

-0.0

09

0.5

24

0.5

44**

SI

-0.0

09

0.0

06

-0.0

03

-0.0

11

0.0

04

0.0

08

-0.0

05

0.2

39

-0.1

95

0.0

09

0.0

20

0.0

08

0.0

00

-0.0

32

0.2

95

0.3

33*

LI

-0.0

04

-0.0

01

0.0

00

-0.0

06

0.0

03

0.0

04

-0.0

04

0.1

80

-0.2

60

-0.0

30

0.0

08

0.0

04

0.0

00

-0.0

15

0.3

72

0.2

50

GP

0.0

06

-0.0

09

0.0

04

0.0

05

-0.0

02

-0.0

05

0.0

00

-0.0

37

-0.1

39

-0.0

55

-0.0

13

-0.0

03

0.0

00

0.0

17

0.1

56

-0.0

75

SC

Y

-0.0

03

0.0

02

-0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

01

-0.0

02

-0.0

01

0.1

27

-0.0

56

0.0

19

0.0

38

0.0

09

0.0

00

-0.0

59

-0.1

89

-0.1

16

UH

ML

-0.0

07

0.0

06

0.0

00

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

02

-0.0

04

0.1

46

-0.0

93

0.0

13

0.0

27

0.0

12

0.0

00

-0.0

49

0.1

00

0.1

55

BS

0.0

02

-0.0

07

-0.0

04

-0.0

01

0.0

02

0.0

09

-0.0

02

0.0

36

-0.0

78

-0.0

15

-0.0

03

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

00

0.0

33

-0.0

28

FF

-0

.005

0.0

03

-0.0

01

0.0

02

0.0

01

0.0

00

-0.0

01

0.1

20

-0.0

63

0.0

15

0.0

35

0.0

10

0.0

00

-0.0

63

-0.1

14

-0.0

62

UI

0.0

06

-0.0

16

-0.0

09

0.0

01

0.0

06

0.0

34

-0.0

04

0.0

71

-0.0

98

-0.0

09

-0.0

07

0.0

01

0.0

00

0.0

07

0.9

89

0.9

73**

Resid

ual E

ffect:

0.0

088

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

et al., et al., (2018) and Praveen Sampath Kumar

(2019) for plant height, seed cotton yield, upper

half mean length, and bundle strength and

Sunayana (2017) for days to first flowering et al.,

and lint index.

High heritability and high genetic advance

over the mean was observed for lint index (81.72

and 28.03%) and bundle strength (100.0 and

51.00%) indicated that most likely the heritability

is due to additive gene effect and improvement of

these traits can be made through direct phenotypic

selection. Similar result was reported by

Santoshkumar (2012). The traits days to first et al.,

flowering (68.70 and 2.17%), plant height (88.90

and 1.65%), seed cotton yield (99.89 and 7.16%),

upper half mean length (100.0 and 6.37%), fibre

fineness (100.0 and 2.49%), uniformity index

(73.65 and 0.17%) and lint yield (79.48 and

0.07%) had high heritability accompanied by low

genetic advance indicated the effect of non additive

gene action and hence heterosis breeding may be

rewarding for these traits. Similar results were

reported by Gnanasekaran (2018) for plant et al.,

height, and Pujer (2014) for uniformity index, et al.,

Santoshkumar (2012) for days to first et al.,

flowering, plant height, seed cotton yield and upper

half mean length.

The genotypic correlation co-efficient

between yield and its components were

presented in Table 2. Lint yield had highly

significant and positive correlation with

characters p lant he ight (0 .673) , v iz . ,

sympodia/plant (0.561), bolls/plant (0.815), boll

weight (0.544) and uniformity index (0.973) and

significant and positive correlation with seed

index (0.333). It indicated that increase in one

trait will simultaneously increase in the other.

Lint yield plant was having significant but /

negative association with days to fifty per cent

flowering (-0.362) and having non-significant

association with days to first flowering (-0.160),

monopodia/plant (-0.011), lint index (0.250),

ginning percentage (-0.075), seed cotton yield (-

0.116), upper half mean length (0.155), bundle

strength (-0.028) and fibre fineness (-0.062).

Such positive association of lint yield with these

traits was also observed by Sunayana et al.,

(2017) for plant height, boll plant, boll weight, /

seed index and negative non significant ginning

percentage. Efrem , (2014) reported the et al.

significant and positive correlation for plant

height, bolls/plant and boll weight. Hence, plant

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/ plant, boll weight

and seed index had significant positive

association with lint yield indicating the

existence of true relationship among these

characters and their exploitation in selection

programmes.

Considering inter-correlation among the

yield contributing traits studied, plant height

exhibited significant and positive correlation

with bolls/plant, boll weight and uniformity

index whereas sympodia/plant showed

significant positive association with bolls/plant,

boll weight, seed index and uniformity index.

Bolls/plant registered a positive and significant

correlation with boll weight and uniformity index

were as boll weight showed significant positive

association with seed index, lint index, upper

half mean length and uniformity index. Seed

index exhibited positive significant correlation

with lint index, seed cotton yield, upper half

mean length and fibre fineness. These results

clearly indicated that selection for any one of

these traits lead to concurrent improvement of

other traits as well as seed cotton yield and lint

yield. Among the fibre quality traits, upper half

mean length had significant positive association

with fibre fineness. The association between yield

components and fibre parameters revealed

significant positive association of plant height,

sympodia/plant, bolls/plant and seed index with

fibre fineness; boll weight and seed index with upper

half mean length indicated that these important

yield contributing traits were good indicators of fibre

properties improvement. Negative correlations

between yield and quality traits were observed and

make the selection procedure difficult where both

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect54 55

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 7: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

the parameters have to be developed simultaneously

but in the present study significant positive

correlation was observed between the yields

contributing traits and some important fibre

properties indicated that simultaneously

improvement of both can be possible.

The genotypic correlation co-efficient of

lint yield with other yield contributing traits were

further partitioned into direct and indirect effects

and the results were presented in Table 3. The

component of residual effect of path analysis in

yield was 0.0088. Uniformity index (0.989)

exhibited maximum positive direct effects on lint

yield followed by seed index (0.239) which has

moderate direct effects whereas bolls/plant

(0.044), days to fifty per cent flowering (0.039),

seed cotton yield (0.038) upper half mean length

(0.012) and sympodia/plant (0.011) exhibited

low to negligible levels of direct effect on lint yield.

Negative and moderate direct effect was observed

in case of lint index (-0.260) whereas fibre fineness

(-0.063), ginning percentage (-0.055), days to first

flower (-0.030), monopodia/plant (-0.029), plant

height (-0.019) and boll weight (-0.004) which

exhibited low to negligible negative direct effect

on lint yield. Thus, these studies revealed that,

the traits which had positive and direct effect on

lint yield should be given due to emphasis for

making selection for high yielding genotypes. In

the present study, uniformity index exhibited

significant and positive indirect effect on lint

yield via plant height (0.588), sympodia/plant

(0.494), bolls/plant (0.769), boll weight (0.524),

seed index (0.295) and lint index (0.372).

Sympodia/plant exhibited positive indirect

effect on lint yield via bolls/plant (0.029) and

seed index (0.093). Bolls/plant exhibited

positive indirect effect on lint yield via seed

index (0.042) while boll weight exhibited

positive indirect effect on lint yield via

bolls/plant (0.023) and seed index (0.151)

which indicated that selection of one character

would help to simultaneous improvement of the

related traits.

CONCLUSION

High estimates of phenotypic coefficient

of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of

variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant. High

heritability and genetic advance was observed

for lint index and bundle strength indicated

that most likely the heritability is due to

additive gene effect and improvement of these

traits can be made through direct phenotypic

selection. Lint yield had highly significant and

positive correlation with characters plant viz.,

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll

weight and uniformity index and significant

with seed index. Significant positive association

of plant height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant

and seed index with fibre fineness, boll weight

and seed index with upper half mean length

ind i ca ted tha t these impor tant y i e ld

contributing traits were good indicators of fibre

properties improvement. Uniformity index

exhibited maximum positive direct effects on

lint yield and also exhibited significant and

positive indirect effect on lint yield via plant

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll

weight, seed index and lint index. Heritability,

correlation and direct and indirect effect

estimates vary for different traits with variation in

genetic material. Hence, present study about

heritability, correlations and direct and indirect

effect estimation would provide useful information

for planning a successful breeding programme if

the genetic material is grouped for yield and fibre

quality characters and also it is essential to device

suitable breeding methodologies for simultaneous

improvement of both yield and quality parameters

involving three way crosses, modified back crosses

or recurrent selection.

REFERENCES

Boopathi, N. M., Thiyagu, K., Urbi, B., Santhoshkumar,

M., Gopikrishnan, A., Aravind, S.,

Swapnashri, G., and Ravikesavan, R. 2011.

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

Marker-Assisted Breeding as Next-Generation

Strategy for Genetic Improvement of

Productivity and Quality: Can It Be Realized in

Cotton? , Article ID Internat. J. .Plant Genom.

670104, 16

Budak, H., Bolek, Y., Dokuyucu, T. and Akkaya, A.

2004. Potential uses of Molecular Markers in

Crop improvement. : 75 – 76KSU J. sci. Engin. 7

Efrem, B., Linghe, Z and Debbie, B.2014. Correlation

and Path-coefficient Analyses of Lint Yield and

Other Traits in Upland Cotton (Gossypium

hirsutum J. Crop Improve. 28 L.). : 852-70

Gite, V.K., Misal, M.B. and Kalpande, H.V. 2006.

Correlation and path analysis in cotton

( L.). , Gossypium hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev.

20 : 51-54.

Gnanasekaran, M., Thiyagu, K and Gunasekaran,

M.2018. Genetic variability heritability and

g ene t i c advance s tud i e s i n c o t t on

( l.) Gossypium hirsutum Elec. J. Plant

Breeding 9, : 377 – 82.

Gururajan, K.N. and Sunder, S. 2004. Yield

component analysis in American cotton

(Gossypium barbadense L.). In: International

Symposium on "Strategies for Sustainable

Cotton Production–A Global Vision. Crop

Improvement." J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv.,

25: 17-22.

Kaushik, S.K. and Kapoor, C.J. 2006. Genetic

variability and association study for yield and

its component traits in upland cotton

( L.). , Gossypium hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev.

20 : 185-90.

Magadum, S., Banerjee, U., Ravikesavan, R.,

Gangapur, D. and Boopathi, N. M. 2012.

Variability and Heritability analysis of yield

and quality traits in Interspecific Population of

Cotton ( .). 484- 85Gossypium Spp Bioinfolet 9 :

Mishra, P. K., Ram, R. B. and Kumar, N. 2015.

Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Genetic

advance in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa

Duch.). : 451-58Turk J Agric. 39

Praveen Sampath Kumar., C, Raju, S., Ebenezer

Babu Rajan,, R Ajish Muraleedharan and

Darling, B. Suji. 2019. Studies on genetic

variability, heritability and genetic advance in

cotton ( ).gossypium hirsutum l. Plant Archives

19, 1 : Supplement 934-37

Pujer, S.K., Siwach, S.S., Sangwan, R.S., Sangwan,

O and Deshmukh, J. 2014. Correlation and

path coefficient analysis for yield and fibre

quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium

hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev. 28 L.). , : 214-16.

Ramanjinappa, V., Arunkumar, K.H., Hugar, A., and

Shashibhaskar, M.S. 2011. Genetic

variability in okra ( L. Abelmoschus esculentus

Moench.). . : 435–37.Plant Archives 11

Rao, G.N., Reddy, M.S.S. and Shanthi, P. 2001.

Correlation and path analysis of seed cotton

yield and its components in cotton. J. Cotton

Res. Dev., 15 : 81-83.

Santoshkumar M, Urbi, B., Ravikesavan, R.,

Doddabhimappa, G and Boopathi N.

Manikanda 2012. Variability and heritability

analysis of yield and quality traits in

interspecific population of cotton (Gossypium

spp.). : 486 – 87. Bioinfolet, 9

Sunayana, Sangwan R., S and Nimbal Somveer

2017. Studies on Association, Path Analysis

and Genetic Parameters for Seed Cotton Yield

and Its Contributing Characters in Desi

C o t t o n ( L . ) . G o s s y p i u m a r b o r e u m

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6: 104-111.doi:

h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 2 0 5 4 6 / i j c m a s .

2017.611.013

Received for publication : September 29, 2020

Accepted for publication : November 9, 2020

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect56 57

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”

Page 8: PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

the parameters have to be developed simultaneously

but in the present study significant positive

correlation was observed between the yields

contributing traits and some important fibre

properties indicated that simultaneously

improvement of both can be possible.

The genotypic correlation co-efficient of

lint yield with other yield contributing traits were

further partitioned into direct and indirect effects

and the results were presented in Table 3. The

component of residual effect of path analysis in

yield was 0.0088. Uniformity index (0.989)

exhibited maximum positive direct effects on lint

yield followed by seed index (0.239) which has

moderate direct effects whereas bolls/plant

(0.044), days to fifty per cent flowering (0.039),

seed cotton yield (0.038) upper half mean length

(0.012) and sympodia/plant (0.011) exhibited

low to negligible levels of direct effect on lint yield.

Negative and moderate direct effect was observed

in case of lint index (-0.260) whereas fibre fineness

(-0.063), ginning percentage (-0.055), days to first

flower (-0.030), monopodia/plant (-0.029), plant

height (-0.019) and boll weight (-0.004) which

exhibited low to negligible negative direct effect

on lint yield. Thus, these studies revealed that,

the traits which had positive and direct effect on

lint yield should be given due to emphasis for

making selection for high yielding genotypes. In

the present study, uniformity index exhibited

significant and positive indirect effect on lint

yield via plant height (0.588), sympodia/plant

(0.494), bolls/plant (0.769), boll weight (0.524),

seed index (0.295) and lint index (0.372).

Sympodia/plant exhibited positive indirect

effect on lint yield via bolls/plant (0.029) and

seed index (0.093). Bolls/plant exhibited

positive indirect effect on lint yield via seed

index (0.042) while boll weight exhibited

positive indirect effect on lint yield via

bolls/plant (0.023) and seed index (0.151)

which indicated that selection of one character

would help to simultaneous improvement of the

related traits.

CONCLUSION

High estimates of phenotypic coefficient

of variation (PCV) and genotypic coefficient of

variation (GCV) for monopodia/plant. High

heritability and genetic advance was observed

for lint index and bundle strength indicated

that most likely the heritability is due to

additive gene effect and improvement of these

traits can be made through direct phenotypic

selection. Lint yield had highly significant and

positive correlation with characters plant viz.,

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll

weight and uniformity index and significant

with seed index. Significant positive association

of plant height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant

and seed index with fibre fineness, boll weight

and seed index with upper half mean length

ind i ca ted tha t these impor tant y i e ld

contributing traits were good indicators of fibre

properties improvement. Uniformity index

exhibited maximum positive direct effects on

lint yield and also exhibited significant and

positive indirect effect on lint yield via plant

height, sympodia/plant, bolls/plant, boll

weight, seed index and lint index. Heritability,

correlation and direct and indirect effect

estimates vary for different traits with variation in

genetic material. Hence, present study about

heritability, correlations and direct and indirect

effect estimation would provide useful information

for planning a successful breeding programme if

the genetic material is grouped for yield and fibre

quality characters and also it is essential to device

suitable breeding methodologies for simultaneous

improvement of both yield and quality parameters

involving three way crosses, modified back crosses

or recurrent selection.

REFERENCES

Boopathi, N. M., Thiyagu, K., Urbi, B., Santhoshkumar,

M., Gopikrishnan, A., Aravind, S.,

Swapnashri, G., and Ravikesavan, R. 2011.

Gnanasekaran, Thiyagu and Gunasekaran

Marker-Assisted Breeding as Next-Generation

Strategy for Genetic Improvement of

Productivity and Quality: Can It Be Realized in

Cotton? , Article ID Internat. J. .Plant Genom.

670104, 16

Budak, H., Bolek, Y., Dokuyucu, T. and Akkaya, A.

2004. Potential uses of Molecular Markers in

Crop improvement. : 75 – 76KSU J. sci. Engin. 7

Efrem, B., Linghe, Z and Debbie, B.2014. Correlation

and Path-coefficient Analyses of Lint Yield and

Other Traits in Upland Cotton (Gossypium

hirsutum J. Crop Improve. 28 L.). : 852-70

Gite, V.K., Misal, M.B. and Kalpande, H.V. 2006.

Correlation and path analysis in cotton

( L.). , Gossypium hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev.

20 : 51-54.

Gnanasekaran, M., Thiyagu, K and Gunasekaran,

M.2018. Genetic variability heritability and

g ene t i c advance s tud i e s i n c o t t on

( l.) Gossypium hirsutum Elec. J. Plant

Breeding 9, : 377 – 82.

Gururajan, K.N. and Sunder, S. 2004. Yield

component analysis in American cotton

(Gossypium barbadense L.). In: International

Symposium on "Strategies for Sustainable

Cotton Production–A Global Vision. Crop

Improvement." J. Indian Soc. Cotton Improv.,

25: 17-22.

Kaushik, S.K. and Kapoor, C.J. 2006. Genetic

variability and association study for yield and

its component traits in upland cotton

( L.). , Gossypium hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev.

20 : 185-90.

Magadum, S., Banerjee, U., Ravikesavan, R.,

Gangapur, D. and Boopathi, N. M. 2012.

Variability and Heritability analysis of yield

and quality traits in Interspecific Population of

Cotton ( .). 484- 85Gossypium Spp Bioinfolet 9 :

Mishra, P. K., Ram, R. B. and Kumar, N. 2015.

Genetic Variability, Heritability, and Genetic

advance in strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa

Duch.). : 451-58Turk J Agric. 39

Praveen Sampath Kumar., C, Raju, S., Ebenezer

Babu Rajan,, R Ajish Muraleedharan and

Darling, B. Suji. 2019. Studies on genetic

variability, heritability and genetic advance in

cotton ( ).gossypium hirsutum l. Plant Archives

19, 1 : Supplement 934-37

Pujer, S.K., Siwach, S.S., Sangwan, R.S., Sangwan,

O and Deshmukh, J. 2014. Correlation and

path coefficient analysis for yield and fibre

quality traits in upland cotton (Gossypium

hirsutum J. Cotton Res. Dev. 28 L.). , : 214-16.

Ramanjinappa, V., Arunkumar, K.H., Hugar, A., and

Shashibhaskar, M.S. 2011. Genetic

variability in okra ( L. Abelmoschus esculentus

Moench.). . : 435–37.Plant Archives 11

Rao, G.N., Reddy, M.S.S. and Shanthi, P. 2001.

Correlation and path analysis of seed cotton

yield and its components in cotton. J. Cotton

Res. Dev., 15 : 81-83.

Santoshkumar M, Urbi, B., Ravikesavan, R.,

Doddabhimappa, G and Boopathi N.

Manikanda 2012. Variability and heritability

analysis of yield and quality traits in

interspecific population of cotton (Gossypium

spp.). : 486 – 87. Bioinfolet, 9

Sunayana, Sangwan R., S and Nimbal Somveer

2017. Studies on Association, Path Analysis

and Genetic Parameters for Seed Cotton Yield

and Its Contributing Characters in Desi

C o t t o n ( L . ) . G o s s y p i u m a r b o r e u m

Int.J.Curr.Microbiol.App.Sci. 6: 104-111.doi:

h t t p s : / / d o i . o r g / 1 0 . 2 0 5 4 6 / i j c m a s .

2017.611.013

Received for publication : September 29, 2020

Accepted for publication : November 9, 2020

Genetic variability, direct and indirect effect56 57

301301

Fig. 8: ICAR-CIRCOT Green Crematorium

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

Internat. J. Curr. Microbiol.

301

1 2

Fig. 1. Fetal monster showing cyclopia and arhinia

ABSTRACT : Annually around 30 million tonnes of cotton stalk is generated in India. Very limited value addition

is done to cotton stalk. Most of the cotton stalk produced is treated as waste, though about 5-6 being used per cent

for commercial purposes and around 15-

Business perspective and entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton stalk by product based industry in India

V. G. ARUDE

ICAR-Central Institute for Research on Cotton Technology, Mumbai, India

Email: [email protected]

Cotton is grown in about 100 countries

and traded in around 150 countries worldwide

Cotton is an important commercial crop of India

and has emerged as the largest producer in the

world with its production touching 6.2 million

tonnes in 2020-2021 (USDA, 2020). Cotton is

cultivated mainly for its fibre which is the most

importa

Arude, V. G. 2020. Business perspective and

entrepreneurship opportunities in cotton

stalk by- product based industry in India.

Invited paper, National Symposium on 'Cotton

Production Technolo

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

AUTHOR INDEX

Vol. 30 January, 2021 No. 1

JOURNAL OF COTTON RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT

SUBJECT INDEX

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The Executive Council of Cotton Research and

Development Association is highly thankful to the

Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) Govt. of

India, New Delhi for the financial grant of Rs. 2,00,000/-

(Two Lakh only) during 2019-2020 for the publication of

the Journal of Cotton Research and Development.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I, on behalf of the Editorial Board of the Cotton

Research and Development Association, CCS Haryana

Agricultural University, Hisar and also on my personal

behalf express my sincere gratitude and heartful thanks to

the honourable referee’s of Vol. 35(1), January, 2021 for

critically examining the manuscripts and for their expert and

valuable comments regarding its suitability for publication.

It hardly needs any mention that the publication of the

journal is of high standard only with your kind cooperation. I

look forward to receive your valuable comments in future

also. The honourable referee’s were Subhash Chander, Rishi

Kumar, Dalip Bishnoi, Man Mohan, Karmal Singh, Manjeet

Singh, Mukesh Kumar, R. S. Sangwan, Roshan Lal, L. S.

Kaushik, D. Monga, Anita Beniwal, Hamid Hasan, Rakesh

Kumar Chugh, Kulvir Singh, C. L. Goswami, D. P. Malik,

Harish Kumar, Kulvir Singh, Paramjit Singh, Pankaj Rathor,

Suneet Pandher, Ajmer Singh and O. P. Tuteja.

Editor-in-Chief

ANNOUNCEMENT

Dear Colleagues,

It is a matter of great proud and privilege for me to bring to your

kind notice that the “Cotton Research and Development Association”,

CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar has introduced the

following awards for the benefit of students and scientists working on

any discipline related to cotton production technologies and allied

subjects from January, 2021.

I. Best Research Paper Award:

The papers published in the “Journal of Cotton Research and

Development” during January to December in a Particular year will be

eligible for the above award.

This award will be in four distinct categories i.e. Crop

Improvement, Crop Production, Crop Protection and Social Sciences.

II. Best Thesis Award (M.Sc. and Ph.D.)

The thesis (M.Sc. or Ph.D.) submitted by any student during

January, 2019 to December, 2020 on cotton crop with any discipline

at any State Agricultural University or Institute is eligible for the

award. A copy of the thesis with date of clearing the thesis examination

or declaration of the result alongwith one copy of the reports of two

external examiner may be submitted to the Secretary, CRDA by 31

January 2021 positively.

The result of the award will be intimated by March, 2021. A plaque

and a certificate will be given at the time of All India Coordinated

Cotton Improvement Project Meeting normally held in the first week of

April every year.

Secretary, CRDA

J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619J. Cotton Res. Dev. 30(1), 000-000 (January, 2020) ISSN No. 0972-8619

PATRONS OF THE ASSOCIATION

1. Sh. VV P. Ahuja. . 7. Sh. Babubhai S. Patel

GTM, Synthetics Ltd., 33, Additional Vikram Seeds Pvt. Ltd., 209, Ashwa Megh Avenue,

Anaj Mandi, Sirsa-I25 055. Near Mithakhali Under Bridge, Mayur Colony,

Navrangpura, Ahmedabad-380 009.

2. Sh. Salil Singhal 8. Mr. R. D. Shroff

Pesticide India Ltd., 503-505, Tower-A, M/s United Phosphorus Ltd.

Millennium Plaza, Sector-27 Uni Phos House, Madhu Park

Gurgaon-I22 002. C. D. Marg, 11th Road, Khar (W)

Mumbai-400 052.

3. Sh. R. G Agarwal 9. M/s Indofil Industries (P) Ltd.

Dhanuka Agritech. Limited Kalpatru Square 4th Floor, Condivila Road,

14th Floor Building 5A Off Andheri Kurla Road Andheri East, Mumbai

DLF Cyber Terrace, Ciber City

DLF Phase -III, Gurugram - 122 002

4. M/s. Ankur Seeds Pvt. Ltd. 10. M/s Monsanto India Ltd.

27, New Cotton Market Layout, Ahura Centre, 5th Floor, 96, Mahakali Caves Road,

Nagpur-440 018. Andheri( E), Mumbai-400 093.

5. Sh. N. P. Patel 11. M/s Bayer Crop Science Limited

Western Agri Seeds Pvt. Ltd. Bayer House, Central Avenve, Hiranandani Gardens,

802/11, Western Road, GIDC P. B. No. 8420, Powal, Mumbai-400 076.

(Engg. Estate) Sector-28, Gandhi Nagar,

Ahmedabad-382 028.

12. M/s Syngenta Crop Protection Ltd.

6. Dr. G S. Raju Amar Paradigm, Survey No. 110-11/3, Baner Road,

Vijay Laxshmi Insecticides and Pesticides Ltd. Baner, PUNE- 411 045

Plot No. 61, 1st floor, Nagarjuna Hills,

Punjagatta, Hyderabad- 500 082.

13. M/s Meghmani Industries

H. NO. 279/2, Sector-45-A, Chandigarh-I60 047

Studies on the effect of In situ soil moisture conservation techniques,

soil conditioner (Pusa hydrogel) with stress management practices on

fibre quality parameters and productivity of rainfed Cotton

A. MOHAMMED ASHRAF* AND T. RAGAVAN

Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, ICAR - Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Tiruvallur - 602 025

*Email: [email protected]

ABSTRACT : A field experiments was conducted at Regional Research Station, Aruppukottai, Tamil Nadu

Agricultural University, Coimbatore, during rabi of 2016 and 2017 to study the impact of in situ moisture

conservation and stress management practices on soil moisture retention and productivity of cotton under

rainfed vertisol with the test variety SVPR - 2. The experiments were laid out in split plot design replicated thrice.

The main plot treatments consisted of different in situ moisture conservation measures viz., Broad Bed and Furrows

(I ), Ridges and Furrows (I ) and Compartmental Bunding (I ). The subplot comprises the stress management 1 2 3

practices viz., Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha (S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar 1

spray of (1%) KCl (S ) , Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of (5%) Kaolin (S ), Soil application 2 3

of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/ha(S ), Soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + 4

foliar spray of Salicylic acid 100 ppm (S ) and Control (S ). The results of this study showed that treatment 5 6

combination of broad bed and furrow with soil application of Pusa hydrogel @ 5 kg/ha + foliar spray of PPFM @ 500 ml/hahad recorded significantly higher values of the quality parameters viz., seed index and lint Index and seed

-1 -1 cotton yield 1,580 kg ha (2016) and 1,943 kg ha (2017). Higher fibre length, uniformity ratio, micronaire value,

fibre strength and elongation percentage recorded under BBF.

Key words: Broad bed and furrows, fibre quality, Pusa hydrogel, rainfed cotton

Cotton as a crop as well as a commodity

plays an important role in the agrarian and

industrial activities of the nation and has a unique

place in the economy of our country. Cotton,

popularly known as “White Gold” is cultivated

mainly for fibre and additionally as an important

source of edible oil. India devotes more area to cotton

than any other country in the world. At present,

India ranks first in area with11.88 M ha, accounting

30 per cent of world average and 22 per cent (351

lakh bales of lint) of the world cotton production with

a lint productivity of 568 kg/ha (Anonymous, 2017).

Nearly 65 per cent of the cotton crop is cultivated

under rainfed condition in the country. In Tamil

Nadu, 1.33 lakh ha area is under cotton cultivation

with a production of 6.5 lakh bales with and lint

productivity of 620 kg/ha. India has been the

traditional home of cotton and their textiles. India has

progressed substantially in improving both

production and productivity of cotton over the last five

Amount of Reading of test at 520 nm – Reading of test at 420 nm X 0.29 X 0.15 X

α-tocopherol in = Reading of standard at 520 nm

µg/g of sample Total volume of homogenate

Volume used X Weight of the sample

Fig. 2. Effect of various treatments on economics of Bt cotton hybrid

MCU 5

TCB 37 x G.anomalum

G.anomalum x G.anomalum

Received for publication :

Accepted for publication :

GUIDELINES FOR AUTHORS1. Membership of the journal for authors is obligatory for the publication of papers.

2. Manuscripts that contain new and significant findings are welcome with the understanding that the contents have not been simultaneously submitted or published in any other journal. Manuscript should be typed in double space on one side of white bond paper (A4 size) leaving at least 5 cm margins on each side, not exceeding 12 typed pages including Tables. The manuscript may be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com).

3. Arrangement of the Manuscript : Manuscripts should be arranged in the following order:

(a) Cover page should contain concise but self explanatory title (up to 20 words), typed in double space with capital letters. In addition, a short running title should be given and typed on top of the cover page of the manuscript. By line should contain, in addition to the name(s) and initials of the author(s), the name of the institution where the research was carried out. Change of address should be given as a footnote. The ABSTRACT (not exceeding 200 words) should be followed by not more than 10 keywords in alphabetical order.

(b) Full paper should be prepared with the headings : ABSTRACT, INTRODUCTION, MATERIALS AND METHODS AND RESULTS AND DISCUSSION.

(c) Short Communications should follow the style of full paper with text headings omitted except ABSTRACT and KEY WORDS.

(d) Table : Each table should be concise and typed on separate page.

(e) Figures drawn with black ink on white paper are preferred.

(f) Photographs for reproduction should be glossy prints with dark and light contrasts (atleast of Post Card size).

(g) Acknowledgement, if any, should be in brief.

(h) References should be arranged alphabetically by the name of the first author and then, if required by the second and third author and so on (surname precedes intitials), year of publication, title of article,

abbreviated title of journal in accordance with the latest edition of the World List of Scientific

Periodicals 4th ed. London, volume number (double underlined), colon and page range. If there is more than one publications by the same author(s) in the same year, the letters 'a', 'b' and so on should be added after the year, both in the text and in the list of REFERENCES at the end.

4. Complete name of publishers and place of publication of books should be given. For proceeding or other publications complete details should be given. The style and punctuation of references should confirmed to the examples illustrated below:

Journal Article

Grover, R.K. and Moore, J.D. 1962. Toximetric studies of fungicides against the brown rot organisms,

Selerotinia fructicola and S. taxa. Phytopathology 52: 876-80.

Book

Pradhan, S. 1983. Agricultural Entomology and Pest Control. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp. 267.

Contribution to a Book

Randhawa, L.S. and Singh, T.H. 1995. Heterosis breeding for crossing present yield barriers in cotton. In: GA. Constable and N.W. Forester (eds.), Challenging the Future: Proceedings of the World Cotton Research Conference I, CSIRO. Australia, p. 617.

Thesis

Sharma, P. 1995. Effect of integrated weed management on yield and quality of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). M.Sc. Thesis, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar.

Papers in conferences/symposia/workshops

Khadi, B.M. Kulkarni, V.N. Katageri, I.S. and Mahantahivayogayya, K. 2004. Development of Cotton hybrids in India and their role in increasing cotton production. National Symposium on “Changing World Order Cotton Research, Development and Policy in Context” held at ANGRAU, Hyderabad from August 10.12.2004 pp. 40-48.

5. The revised manuscript should be uploaded on CRDA website i.e., crdaindia.com) alongwith the

original and referees comments, if any

Manuscripts which do not confirm to these directives are liable to be returned to the authors.

The Editorial Board takes no responsibility for facts or the opinion expressed in this Journal which rests entirely with the authors.

“For Style of manuscripts, consult the recent issue of the Journal”