paul h bridges uk credit forum. credit is a formal quantified recognition of learning achievement...
TRANSCRIPT
Paul H Bridges
UK Credit Forum
HE Credit Practice in the UK
The Implications for the Standards of Awards
Credit is a formal quantified recognition of learning achievement awarded to learners
Definition of credit
The formal recognition of learning achieved in various settingsRecording progress towards qualificationsEnabling transfer between programmes and between institutions
The roles of credit
The amount of learning
The credit level
Academic context
The number of credits
Intellectual demand and
depth of learning
The curriculum
Academic Standard
HOW MUCH HAS BEEN LEARNT?
WHAT HAS BEEN LEARNT?
HOW DEEP IS THE LEARNING?
Previous surveys in 1998, 1999 and 2004; but 2012 was the first UK wide survey
A Survey of HE Credit Practice in the UK
Is there, in effect, a single credit system in operation in the UK
Have institutions adopted common labels for levels and common level descriptors?
Have institutions adopted common credit requirements for major awards?
Are there significant differences in credit
practice which have implications for students?
Questionnaire was designed with help and advice of members of the credit consortia
Some continuity with previous surveys and also new questions
Separate versions for England & NI, Wales and Scotland to reflect national frameworks?
Questionnaire placed online Total 65 responses; 53 England & NI; 5 Wales
and 7 Scotland; one-third pre-1992 universities
Research method and response
Credit level label Yes %
Entry Level to Level 8 28 53%
Level HE 0 to Level HE 5 7 13%
Level HE 3 to Level HE 7 26 49%
Basic Level and Advanced Level 1 2%
Framework for Qualifications in the European HE area (Bologna cycles)
6 11%
None 1 2%
How do you label the credit levels?
England and Northern Ireland
Descriptors Yes %
Higher Education Credit Framework (NICATS)
36 68%
Southern England Consortium (SEEC)
13 25%
Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF)
7 13%
Institution’s own descriptors 9 17%
None 3 6%
Which credit level descriptors?
Creditsize
Undergraduate Number of institutions
Postgraduate Number of Institutions
10 1 1
15 10 9
20 24 18
24 1 0
30 7 12
45 0 1
Standard module size
Position Yes %
Every module has an approved or validated set of learning outcomes
63 97%
In some modules students may negotiate the learning outcomes
24 37%
An assignment may be designed to test more than one learning outcome
62 95%
Assessment criteria are used to test whether learning outcomes are achieved
59 91%
Assessment criteria are used to determine the grade or mark
63 97%
Learning outcomes and assessment criteria
Position Yes %
Satisfy all the module learning outcomes 37 57%
Satisfy most of the module learning outcomes
22 34%
A pass in each module assessment 30 46%An overall pass in the aggregated module assessments
52 80%
An overall pass in the aggregated module assessments and at least a threshold mark in each assessment
33 51%
A pass in the summative assessment 25 38%
Other criteria? 8 12%
Basis for the award of credit
Position Yes %
Condonement is permitted 34 52
Credit is awarded for condoned modules 18 28
Compensation is permitted 39 60
Credit is awarded for compensated modules
34 52
Both condonement and compensation are permitted
12 18
Neither condonement nor compensation is permitted
5 8
Condonement and compensation
Institutional position Yes
Does your institution normally issue transcripts showing the credits achieved?
97%
Does your institution offer students the opportunity to keep a progress file?
66%
Does your institution normally issue a European Diploma Supplement to students who have completed their HE awards?
71%
Does the Diploma Supplement show the ECTS credits awarded?
72%
Does your institution use or plan to implement the Higher Education Achievement Report?
86%
Record of achievement
Is it acceptable to condone module failure and award credit in respect of the condoned module?
Is it acceptable to compensate module failure and award credit in respect of the compensated module
Is it acceptable to set aside or discount weaker modules performances in calculating the class of honours achieved by a candidate
Should there be a framework or convention for minor HE awards?
What is the best way to determine the shelf-life of credits?
Is it acceptable to allow credit which as already been used to award a major qualification to be re-used towards another?
The marginal fail is not a significant shortcoming so the fail performance has been condoned and you may pass
Condonement
The marginal fail is not a significant shortcoming so the fail performance has been compensated by your positive performance elsewhere and you may pass
Compensation
Condonement and compensation
02468
1012
15 20 30 4002468
1012
15 20 30 40
02468
1012
15 20 30 40
02468
1012
20 30 40 60 80 90120
Level 4 Level 5
Level 6 Levels 4, 5 and 6
Number of institutions
credits
02468
101214
1520 30406002468
101214
1520304060
02468
101214
1520 304060
Level 4 Level 5
Level 6 Levels 4, 5 and 6
Number of institutions
02468
101214
30 40 60 80 90 120
credits
The marginal fail has been forgiven and a retake is not required but there is no evidential basis for the award of credit
Condoned failure
The marginal fail has been compensated by a positive performance elsewhere. This formal recognition of achievement may be used as the basis for the award of credit.
Compensated failure
Should credit be awarded?
0123456
15 20 30 40
0123456
15 20 30 40
0
1
2
3
15 20 30 40
0
2
4
6
8
15 20 30 40
Number of institutions
credits
Level 5 Level 6
Unspecified levels The total permitted
The average mark excluding the two weakest marks
The two weakest module marks
Average mark with no discount
Average mark with discount
1 70% 65 : 65 69.2% 70%
2 70% 55 : 55 67.5% 70%
3 60% 55: 55 59.4% 60%
4 70% 45 :45 65.8% 70%
5 60% 45: 45 57.5% 60%
6 70% 35: 35 64.2% 70%
7 60% 35: 35 55.8% 60%
Credit is awarded in respect of achievement but if the same credit is used repeatedly for major awards, this is a form of abuse
Everyone accepts that there are situations where the credit may count towards an minor award and then may be used for major award
So how do we frame rules to permit the acceptable and stop the unacceptable?
The use and abuse of credit
The Undergraduate family
The Postgraduate family
7 The Integrated Master’s Degree
8 The Professional Doctorate
6 Honours Degree 7iii Master’s Degree
6 Degree/Ordinary Degree/Unclassified
7ii Postgraduate Diploma
5 Foundation Degree 7i Postgraduate Certificate
5 Higher National Diploma The Graduate family5 Diploma of Higher Education 6 Graduate Diploma
4 Higher National Certificate 6 Graduate Certificate
4 Certificate of Higher Education 6 Professional Certificate of Education
Credit from a certificated award may contribute to higher and larger awards in same family
Once the highest award in a family has been certificated, the constituent credit has been spent. It is not re-usable for any award.
A proposed way forward
Credit from a certificated award may not contribute to an equivalent or lower award
Credit achieved may be used for any award in any family for which it is deemed acceptable
The terms certificate and diploma are used inconsistently
• Differentiate between awards at different levels• Differentiate between awards of different sizes at the same
level
Certificate awards range from 20 to 120 creditsDiploma awards range from 40 to 180 credits.
Also variation in the use of foundation. • the term for awards at level 3 • The term for awards at level 4• One institution offers preparatory awards at level 3• Advanced is applied to awards from level 4 to level 6• Half of institutions prefix small awards with the word University
Minor awards
Shelf-life of credit
No policy
Varies by programme
2 yrs 5 yrs 6 yrs 9 yrs 10 yrs
Yes 19 2 1 20 1 1 1
The shelf-life of credit
Condoning or compensating large amounts of module failure
Discounting or excluding numerous weaker module performances from the calculation of the honours classification
Permitting students to re-use credit which has already been used for a certificated major award such as an honours degree
Risks to academic standards