payment and performance surety bonds and subguard insurance in construction...
TRANSCRIPT
Payment and Performance Surety Bonds and
Subguard Insurance in Construction Projects Asserting and Defending Surety Bond Claims and Exploring a Cost Effective Alternative for Owners, Contractors and Sureties to Protect Rights or Maximize Recovery
Today’s faculty features:
1pm Eastern | 12pm Central | 11am Mountain | 10am Pacific
The audio portion of the conference may be accessed via the telephone or by using your computer's
speakers. Please refer to the instructions emailed to registrants for additional information. If you
have any questions, please contact Customer Service at 1-800-926-7926 ext. 10.
TUESDAY, OCTOBER 23, 2012
Presenting a live 90-minute webinar with interactive Q&A
Lawrence Melton, Partner, Nexsen Pruet, Columbia, S.C.
Jonathan Burwood, Partner, Hinshaw Culbertson, Boston
Ira Schulman, Partner, Pepper Hamilton, New York
Sound Quality
If you are listening via your computer speakers, please note that the quality of
your sound will vary depending on the speed and quality of your internet
connection.
If the sound quality is not satisfactory and you are listening via your computer
speakers, you may listen via the phone: dial 1-866-871-8924 and enter your
PIN -when prompted. Otherwise, please send us a chat or e-mail
[email protected] immediately so we can address the problem.
If you dialed in and have any difficulties during the call, press *0 for assistance.
Viewing Quality
To maximize your screen, press the F11 key on your keyboard. To exit full screen,
press the F11 key again.
For CLE purposes, please let us know how many people are listening at your
location by completing each of the following steps:
• In the chat box, type (1) your company name and (2) the number of
attendees at your location
• Click the SEND button beside the box
FOR LIVE EVENT ONLY
If you have not printed the conference materials for this program, please
complete the following steps:
• Click on the + sign next to “Conference Materials” in the middle of the left-
hand column on your screen.
• Click on the tab labeled “Handouts” that appears, and there you will see a
PDF of the slides for today's program.
• Double click on the PDF and a separate page will open.
• Print the slides by clicking on the printer icon.
Surety Bonds and Subcontractor’s Default Insurance
October 23, 2012
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012
Lawrence C. Melton Nexsen Pruet, LLC
Columbia, South Carolina
Jonathan Burwood Hinshaw Culberston
Boston, Massachusetts
Ira Schulman Pepper Hamilton, LLP New York, New York
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 6
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 7
1976 J.D. Washington & Lee Law School Admitted: Virginia, DC, South Carolina
1979 Representing Contractors on D.C. Metro System
1997 Returned to South Carolina
1998 Teaching Construction Law at University of South Carolina School of Law
2001 Joined Nexsen Pruet – 7 offices in North and South Carolina; General Commercial Practice; 12 in construction practice group
2005 Published South Carolina Construction Law- 2ed. 2012.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 8
Owner Contractor
Wants Building
Has Money
Can Build Wants Money
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 9
Owner Contractor
Build First
Pay Later
Pay First Build Later
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 10
Negotiated Schedule of Values, e.g. AIA A201 (2007) §9.2
Applications for Payment Based on % of Completion
Architect’s Certificate of Payment
Retainage/Substantial Completion/Punch List/Final Acceptance
11 Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012
Bill based on % of work in place Owner GC Payment based on approved % of work (self performs 0% of work)
less retainage Subs Suppliers
Subs and suppliers invoice full price. GC paid for work
in place less retainage. GC never has enough to pay subs/
suppliers in full. GC subject to Prompt Payment Acts.
Subs may agree to retainage
• Suppliers probably will not agree to retainage
Owner may agree to pay upfront: mobilization;
general conditions; special equipment acquisition
• Owner will not agree to front end loading
• GC Subject to False Claims Acts (31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq.)
29 States and D.C.
Survey Equipment
Clearing & Grading Redi-mix
Foundation Steel
Rebar Windows
Concrete Tile
Framing Paint
Electrical Bricks
Mechanical Etc.
Roofing
Painting
Landscaping
Etc.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 12
Every construction contract or subcontract is an extension of credit.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 13
Subs/suppliers Risk not getting paid/not paid on time
GC Risk of subs/suppliers filing liens/non-performance/failure/bankruptcy
Owner Risk of GC non-performance; technical incompetence; underbidding; dishonesty; mismanagement; liens tie up financing
Eliminate Risks Do Not build
Manage the Risk Bonds and Insurance
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 14
Mechanics’ Liens: An American Solution to a Universal Problem: Laws of Maryland 1791, Chap. XLV, X : “. . . for all sums due and owing, on written contracts, for the building of any house in the said city . . . the undertaker . . . employed by the person for whose use the house shall be built, shall have a lien on the house and the ground on which the same is erected. . . and shall have the remedy as upon a mortgage . . .” Mechanics’ Liens do not apply to Government projects absent express waiver of sovereign immunity.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 15
Being surety has ruined many men who were prosperous . . .”
Ecclesiasticus, 29:18 (circa 180 B.C.)
3 Parties:
Contract for construction
Owner (bond obligee) GC (bond principal)
promise to pay GAI premiums
Surety (Bond Obligor)
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 16
INSURANCE - “A contract whereby one undertakes to indemnify another or pay a specified amount upon determinable contingencies.” S.C. Code § 38-1-20.
• Funded by a pool of premium paying risk takers • Underwriting based on actuarial tables • No indemnity of insurer by insured
SURETY BOND - Promise to pay the debt of another
• Funded by the Bond Principal • Underwriting based on performance record of Bond Principal
and personal assets • Principal indemnifies the Surety – General Agreement of
Indemnity (“GAI”)
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 17
PAYMENT BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to pay subs/suppliers if not paid by GC PERFORMANCE BOND: 3 PARTY AGREEMENT Surety promises owner to complete project in event of GC default SUB-CONTRACTOR DEFAULT INSURANCE: 2 PARTY AGREEMENT Insurer reimburses the contractor for the direct costs incurred arising from subcontractor or supplier default.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 18
STATUTORY BONDS MILLER ACT: Act of August 24, 1935, 49 Stat. 793 (40 U.S.C. § 3131, formerly 40 U.S.C. §270a). Applies to projects > $100K. LITTLE MILLER ACTS: See, Bransdorfer’s 50-State Little Miller Act Compilation (bransdorfer.net) or contact the American Subcontractor’s Association, (asa.org), in Alexandria, VA. NOTE: Some States have more than one Little Miller Act, e.g., S. C. has three, § 29-5-440 (payment bonds required on all State projects), § 11-1-120 (payment & performance bonds required on most contracts by agencies subject to State Consolidated Procurement Code), § 29-6-210 (SC DOT Bonds).
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 19
The Miller Act Bond: FAR 53.301-25-A Standard Form 25-A, Payment Bond:
OBLIGATION:
We, the Principal and Surety(ies), are firmly bound to the United States of America (hereinafter called Government) in the above penal sum. For payment of the penal sum, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, and successors, jointly and severally. However, where the Sureties are corporations acting as co-sureties, we, the Sureties, bind ourselves in such sum “jointly and severally” as well as “severally” only for the purpose of allowing a joint action or actions against any or all of us. For all other purposes, each Surety binds itself, jointly and severally with the Principal for the payment of the sum shown opposite the name of the Surety. If no limit of liability is indicated, the limit of liability is the full amount of the penal sum.
CONDITIONS:
The above obligation is void if the Principal promptly makes payment to all persons having a direct relationship with the Principal or a subcontractor of the Principal for furnishing labor, material or both in the prosecution of the work provided for in the contract identified above, and any authorized modifications of the contract that subsequently are made. Notice of those modifications to the Surety(ies) are waived.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 20
§ 2. If the Contractor promptly makes payment of all sums due to Claimants, and defends, indemnifies and holds harmless the Owner from claims, demands, liens or suits by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract, then the Surety and the Contractor shall have no obligation under this Bond. § 3. If there is no Owner Default under the Construction Contract, the Surety’s obligation to the Owner under this Bond shall arise after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the surety of claims, demands, liens or suits against the Owner or the Owner’s property by any person or entity seeking payment for labor, materials or equipment furnished for use in the performance of the Construction Contract and tendered defense of such claims, demands, liens or suits to the Contractor and the Surety.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 21
§ 3. “If there is no Owner Default [defined in § 16.4 as non-payment] under the Construction Contract . . . after the Owner has promptly notified the Contractor and the Surety. . .”
§ 5 Notice requirements for subcontractors and remote claimants – claim must be for work done/material furnished “within ninety (90) days after having last performed labor or last furnished materials or equipment included in the Claim” – NOTE §15 “Upon request by any person or entity appearing to be a potential beneficiary of this Bond, the Contractor and Owner shall promptly furnish a copy of this Bond or shall permit a copy to be made.” DON’T WAIT UNTIL THE INVOICE IS OVERDUE TO REQUEST A COPY OF THE BOND!!!! Also NOTE § 16.1 - .8 – definitions of “Claim”
§ 7.1 [Surety to respond within sixty (60) days after receipt of the Claim]
§ 7.3 Bond obligee (Owner) entitled to attorneys’ fees if Surety fails to pay amounts agreed to be owed
§ 8 Surety’s obligation limited to amount of the Bond
§ 10 Surety not liable for obligations unrelated to the Construction Contract
§ 12 One year statute of limitations (not enforceable in many states, e.g. SC)
CAVEAT: PRIVATE BONDS MAY BE SUBJECT TO STATE REGULATION AS TO NOTICE, ETC.,
e.g., S.C. CODE § 29-5-440.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 22
1. RTB!! Read the Bond.
2. RTS!! Read the Statute.
3. RTB2!! Read the Book. See, Kevin L. Lybeck, et al., The Law of Payment Bonds (2d ed.), ABA (2011). 921 Pages!!!!
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 23
A. Coverage: Miller Act
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 24
Prime Contractor
Materialman
(proper bond claimant)
Subcontractor
(proper bond claimant)
Subcontractor
(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman
(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Who can make a claim on Miller Act projects?
Sub-Subcontractor
(proper bond
claimant provided
notice to Prime
Contractor within 90
days of last work)
1st Tier
2nd Tier
(Remote Claimant)
3rd Tier
Materialman
(proper bond
claimant provided
notice to Prime
Contractor within 90
days of last work)
Sub-Sub-Subcontractor
(NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman (NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Materialman (NOT a proper
bond claimant)
Proper Bond Claimant
Never a Proper Bond Claimant (i.e., out of luck) 25
AIA A312 – 2010, § 16.2 definition of Claimant includes: “any individual or entity that has rightfully asserted a claim under an applicable mechanic’s lien or similar statute against the real property upon which the Project is located.” B. BONDING CAPACITY (NOT EVERBODY HAS IT). C. INSOLVENCY OF THE SURETY. D. TIMELINESS OF THE SURETY’S RESPONSE. E. CLAIMS ARE SUBJECT TO SURETY DEFENSES: 1. OWNER DEFAULT. 2. OWNER OVERPAYMENT (POTENTIAL LIABILITY FOR A/E) 3. SUBROGATION: RIGHT TO ASSERT PRINCIPAL’S DEFENSES, E .G. NON-PERFORMANCE, POOR PERFORMANCE, FAILURE TO MITIGATE DAMAGES. 4. LACK OF NOTICE F. PENAL SUM IS LIMIT OF LIABILITY.
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 26
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 27
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 28
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 29
Lawrence C. Melton
Nexsen Pruet, LLC
803.771.8900
Strafford Seminar October 23, 2012 30
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 31
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
INTRODUCTION & GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS
► The Tripartite Relationship
► The Indemnity Agreement
► Surety ≠ Insurance
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 32
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
RT(F)B: “READ THE @*$%# BOND!”
► Public Projects & Statutory Bonds
Federal Miller Act
State ‘Little Miller Acts’
► Private Projects
Terms of the Bond Control
► Bonds Are Contracts
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 33
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
NOTICE
TERMINATION DEFAULT
PERFORMANCE BOND CLAIMS: MAGIC WORDS?
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 34
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
DEFAULT/NOTICE:
L&A Contracting Company v. Southern Concrete Services, Inc., 17 F.3d 106 (5th Cir. 1994).
Balfour Beatty Construction, Inc. v. Colonial Ornamental Iron Works, Inc., 986 F.Supp. 82 (D.Conn. 1997).
Dragon Construction, Inc. v. Parkway Bank & Trust, 678 N.E.2d 55 (Ill.App.Ct. 1997).
TERMINATION:
Elm Haven Const. v. Neri Const., LLC, 281 F.Supp.2d 406 D.Conn. 2003); Enter. Capital, Inc. v. The San-Gra Corp., 284 F.Supp.2d 166 (D.Mass. 2003).
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 35
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
Tender Do
Nothing
Surety
Options
Takeover
BASIC SURETY OPTIONS: CHOOSE WISELY
SURETY INVESTIGATION
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 36
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
IMPORTANT ECONOMIC ISSUES
► Financing The Principal
► The Contract Proceeds
► Liquidated Damages
► Bond Penal Sum
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 37
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
COMMON SURETY DEFENSES
► Principal Defenses
► Coverage Issues
► Conditions Precedent
► Limitations Provisions
► Impairment of Collateral
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 38
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
BEST PRACTICES: CLAIMANTS
► Read The Bond / Read The Contract
► Satisfy All Conditions
► Clear & Unequivocal Communication
► Preserve The Contract Funds
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 39
SURETY PERFORMANCE BONDS
BEST PRACTICES: SURETIES
► Read The Bond / Read The Contract
► Investigate & Document
► Be Aware of the Penal Sum
► Secure The Contract Funds
© 2012 Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP, an Illinois Limited Liability Partnership. All rights reserved. 40
Jonathan C. Burwood Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP
Office 617-213-7009
www.hinshawlaw.com
Ira M. Schulman October 23, 2012
An Introduction To Subcontractor’s Default Insurance (“SDI”)
42
Background
• A surety bond is a three-way agreement whereby the surety guarantees to one party the performance and/or payment of another party.
• SDI (issued by Zurich Insurance under the name of SubGuard) is a two-party agreement between the contractor and the insurer that reimburses the contractor for the direct costs incurred arising from subcontractor or supplier defaults.
• With SDI the contractor prequalifies the subcontractor/suppliers providing the contractor with flexibility and control unavailable with surety bonds.
43
Candidates For SDI
• High Annual subcontractor volume
• Financial strength, management expertise, and willingness to accept the financial risk associated with SDI.
• Successful history of project completion
44
Surety Bonds
• Bid, performance, and payment bonds.
• The bonding rate is calculated based upon contract amount
• Protection in the event of a refusal or failure to perform
• Potential refusal of surety to take over work of defaulted contractor
• Negative Impact to project schedule and budget
• Personal assets put at risk
45
Advantages of Surety Bonds
• Objective prequalification
• Available to lower tier subcontractors/suppliers
• Penal Sum Limits
• No Deductible
• Established body of law regarding interpretation and implementation
• Available to entities that may otherwise not qualify for SDI
46
Concerns Regarding SDI
• It’s the new kid on the block
• No guarantee of Project Completion
• Expensive deductibles
• Only available to high performing general contractors or at-risk construction managers
• Provides post-default funding that can prevent domino-style project-wide delays
• Limit of liability may not be congruent with total subcontract exposure
47
Subcontractor Default Insurance
• Shifts burden of defaulting contractor to the insurance company
• Covers all subcontractors for the project
• Reimburses all direct costs incurred to complete the defaulting subcontractor’s work, including the cost of attorneys and consultant fees incurred to remedy the default
• Policy exclusions
• The contractor absorbs the deductible
• No coverage for third-party injury claims
48
Contractor Advantages
• Coverage limit
• Flexibility
• Potential Cost Savings
• Reimbursement of Attorney’s fees and other non-brick and mortar costs that are not covered by standard surety bonds
• Allows use of Subcontractors that may not have established bonding lines
• Avoids waiting for outcome of dispute resolution before reimbursement of costs to complete
49
Contractor Disadvantages
• Financial Risk
• Increased Responsibility
• Absence of settled case law
• Subcontractor waryness
50
Subcontractor/Supplier Perspective
• Preservation of Bonding line
• No indemnity required
• Default without termination
• Continuation of payments
• Potential “vendex” issue (re: default)
51
Owner Perspective
• Many owners do not fully understand SDI
• Large lending Institutions favor SDI
• SDI helps keep the Project on time
• Subcontractor Defaults do not impact project budget
SUMMARY
• Established in 1890
• More than 500 lawyers
• Twelve offices in seven states (PA, NJ, DE, NY, MA,
MI and CA) and the District of Columbia
• Practice is approximately 36% commercial / 53%
litigation / 11% intellectual property
• National and international practice (including active
client matters in Europe, the UAE, the Near East, the
Far East, South America, Canada and other parts of
the world)
Firm Facts
Commercial
• Corporate & Securities
• Corporate Restructuring & Bankruptcy
• Employee Benefits
• Financial Services
• Real Estate
• Tax
• Trusts & Estates
Intellectual Property
• Patent Litigation
• Patent Prosecution
Litigation and Dispute Resolution
• Commercial Litigation
• Construction
• Environmental
• Health Effects Litigation
• Labor & Employment
Firm Structure
www.pepperlaw.com
Pepper has expanded from its Philadelphia origins to 12 locations.
Our Locations
BERWYN 400 Berwyn Park
899 Cassatt Road
Berwyn, PA 19312-1183
610.640.7800
FAX 610.640.7835
BOSTON 15th Floor
Oliver Street Tower
125 High Street
Boston, MA 02110-2736
617.204.5100
FAX 617.204.5150
DETROIT Suite 1800
4000 Town Center
Southfield, MI 48075-1505
248.359.7300
FAX 248.359.7700
HARRISBURG Suite 200
100 Market Street
P.O. Box 1181
Harrisburg, PA 17108-1181
717.255.1155
FAX 717.238.0575
LOS ANGELES Suite 2450
355 South Grand Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90071-9500
213.943.1356
FAX 213.943.1357
NEW YORK The New York Times Building
37th Floor, 620 Eighth Ave
New York, NY 10018-1405
212.808.2700
FAX 212.286.9806
ORANGE COUNTY Suite 1200
4 Park Plaza
Irvine, CA 92614-5955
949.567.3500
FAX 949.863.0151
PHILADELPHIA 3000 Two Logan Square
Eighteenth and Arch Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19103-2799
215.981.4000
FAX 215.981.4750
PITTSBURGH Suite 5000
500 Grant Street
Pittsburgh, PA 15219-2507
412.454.5000
FAX 412.281.0717
PRINCETON Suite 400
301 Carnegie Center
Princeton, NJ 08543-5276
609.452.0808
FAX 609.452.1147
WASHINGTON Hamilton Square
600 Fourteenth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005-2004
202.220.1200
FAX 202.220.1665
WILMINGTON Hercules Plaza, Suite 5100
1313 Market Street
P.O. Box 1709
Wilmington, DE 19899-1709
302.777.6500
FAX 302.421.8390
For more information, visit www.pepperlaw.com.
Pepper Hamilton, LLP The New York Times Building 620 Eighth Avenue-37th Floor
New York, NY 10018-1405
Ira M. Schulman 212.808.2718 [email protected]