p/c insurance industry overview & outlook for 2014 and beyond midwest actuarial forum...
TRANSCRIPT
P/C Insurance Industry Overview & Outlook for
2014 and BeyondMidwest Actuarial Forum
Northridge, ILApril 11, 2014
Steven N. Weisbart, Ph.D., CLU, Senior Vice President & Chief EconomistInsurance Information Institute 110 William Street New York, NY 10038
Tel: 212.346.5540 Cell: 917.494.5945 [email protected] www.iii.org
2
2013: Best Year (So Far)in the Post-Crisis Era
Performance Improved with Lower CATs, Firming Markets
2
3
P/C Net Premiums Written: % Change, Quarter vs. Year-Prior Quarter
Sources: ISO, Insurance Information Institute.
Sustained growth in written premiums(vs. the same quarter, prior year) should continue through 2014.
10.2
%15
.1%
16.8
%16
.7%
12.5
%10
.1%
9.7%
7.8%
7.2%
5.6%
2.9%
5.5%
-4.6
%-4
.1%
-5.8
%-1
.6%
10.3
%10
.2% 13
.4%
6.6%
-1.6
%2.
1%0.
0%-1
.9%
0.5%
-1.8
%-0
.7%
-4.4
%-3
.7%
-5.3
%-5
.2%
-1.4
%-1
.3%
1.3% 2.
3%1.
7% 3.5%
1.6%
4.1%
3.8%
3.0% 4.
2% 5.1%
4.8%
4.1% 4.7%
4.2%
-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
2002
:Q1
2002
:Q2
2002
:Q3
2002
:Q4
2003
:Q1
2003
:Q2
2003
:Q3
2003
:Q4
2004
:Q1
2004
:Q2
2004
:Q3
2004
:Q4
2005
:Q1
2005
:Q2
2005
:Q3
2005
:Q4
2006
:Q1
2006
:Q2
2006
:Q3
2006
:Q4
2007
:Q1
2007
:Q2
2007
:Q3
2007
:Q4
2008
:Q1
2008
:Q2
2008
:Q3
2008
:Q4
2009
:Q1
2009
:Q2
2009
:Q3
2009
:Q4
2010
:Q1
2010
:Q2
2010
:Q3
2010
:Q4
2011
:Q1
2011
:Q2
2011
:Q3
2011
:Q4
2012
:Q1
2012
:Q2
2012
:Q3
2012
:Q4
2013
:Q1
2013
:Q1
2013
:Q3
Premium growth in Q3 2013 was up 4.2% over Q3 2012, marking the
14th consecutive quarter of y-o-y growth
Underwriting Gain (Loss)1975–2013:Q3*
* Includes mortgage and financial guaranty insurers in all years.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
Large underwriting losses are NOT sustainable in the current investment environment.
-$55
-$45
-$35
-$25
-$15
-$5
$5
$15
$25
$35
75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 1213:Q3
Cumulative underwriting deficit from 1975 through
2012 is $510B
($ Billions)Underwriting profit through
2013:Q3 totaled $10.5B
High cat losses in 2011 led to the highest
underwriting loss since 2002
P/C Net Income After Taxes1991–2013:Q3 ($ Millions)
2005 ROE*= 9.6% 2006 ROE = 12.7% 2007 ROE = 10.9% 2008 ROE = 0.1% 2009 ROE = 5.0% 2010 ROE = 6.6% 2011 ROAS1 = 3.5% 2012 ROAS1 = 5.9% 2013:9M ROAS1 = 9.5%
•ROE figures are GAAP; 1Return on avg. surplus. Excluding Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers yields a 8.9% ROAS through 2013:Q3, 6.2% ROAS in 2012, 4.7% ROAS for 2011, 7.6% for 2010 and 7.4% for 2009.Sources: A.M. Best, ISO, Insurance Information Institute
$1
4,1
78
$5
,84
0
$1
9,3
16
$1
0,8
70
$2
0,5
98
$2
4,4
04 $3
6,8
19
$3
0,7
73
$2
1,8
65
$3
,04
6
$3
0,0
29
$6
2,4
96
$3
,04
3
$3
5,2
04
$1
9,4
56 $
33
,52
2
$4
3,0
29
$2
8,6
72
-$6,970
$6
5,7
77
$4
4,1
55
$2
0,5
59
$3
8,5
01
-$10,000
$0
$10,000
$20,000
$30,000
$40,000
$50,000
$60,000
$70,000
$80,000
91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13:9M
2013:9M ROAS
was 9.5%
Net income is up substantially
(+54.7%) from 2012:Q3 $27.8B
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
:Q3
Profitability Peaks & Troughs in the P/C Insurance Industry, 1975 – 2013:Q3*
*Profitability = P/C insurer ROEs. 2011-13 figures are estimates based on ROAS data. Note: Data for 2008-2013 exclude mortgage and financial guaranty insurers.Source: Insurance Information Institute; NAIC, ISO, A.M. Best.
1977:19.0% 1987:17.3%
1997:11.6%2006:12.7%
1984: 1.8% 1992: 4.5% 2001: -1.2%
10 Years
10 Years9 Years
History suggests next ROE peak will be in 2016-2017
ROE
1975: 2.4%
2013:Q3 8.9%
7
P/C Insurance Industry Combined Ratio, 2001–2013:Q3*
* Excludes Mortgage & Financial Guaranty insurers 2008--2012. Including M&FG, 2008=105.1, 2009=100.7, 2010=102.4, 2011=108.1; 2012:=103.2; 2013:Q3 = 95.8. Sources: A.M. Best, ISO.
95.7
99.3
100.8
106.3
102.4
96.6
101.0
92.6
100.8
98.4
100.1
107.5
115.8
90
100
110
120
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013:Q3
Best Combined Ratio Since 1949 (87.6)
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Heavy Use of Reinsurance Lowered Net
Losses
Relatively Low CAT Losses, Reserve Releases
Avg. CAT Losses,
More Reserve Releases
Higher CAT
Losses, Shrinking Reserve
Releases, Toll of Soft
Market
Cyclical Deterioration
Sandy
Lower CAT
Losses
8
Policyholder Surplus, 2006:Q4–2013:Q3
Sources: ISO, A.M .Best.
($ Billions)
$487.1$496.6
$512.8$521.8
$478.5
$455.6
$437.1
$463.0
$490.8
$511.5
$540.7$530.5
$544.8
$559.2 $559.1
$538.6$550.3
$567.8
$583.5$586.9
$624.4
$570.7$566.5
$505.0$515.6$517.9
$400
$450
$500
$550
$600
$650
06:Q
4
07:Q
1
07:Q
2
07:Q
3
07:Q
4
08:Q
1
08:Q
2
08:Q
3
08:Q
4
09:Q
1
09:Q
2
09:Q
3
09:Q
4
10:Q
1
10:Q
2
10:Q
3
10:Q
4
11:Q
1
11:Q
2
11:Q
3
11:Q
4
12:Q
1
12:Q
2
12:Q
3
12:Q
4
13:Q
3
2007:Q3Pre-Crisis Peak
Surplus as of 9/30/13 stood at a record high $624.4B
2010:Q1 data includes $22.5B of paid-in capital from a holding company parent for one insurer’s investment in a non-insurance business .
The industry now has $1 of surplus for every $0.78 of NPW,close to the strongest claims-paying status in its history.
Drop due to near-record 2011 CAT losses
The P/C insurance industry entered 2014in very strong financial shape.
9
Profitability and Growth in the Midwest
P/C Insurance Markets
Analysis by Line and State
10
Unemployment Rates Vary Widelyby State within MAF Region*
4.7%
6.4% 6.1%
7.8%
6.9%6.6%
8.7%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
IL MI OH US IN WI MN
Une
mpl
oym
ent R
ate
(%)
*Provisional figures for January 2014, seasonally adjusted.
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute
Just a few years ago Michigan had the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Now it’s not even the highest in this region!
11
Return on Net Worth, All Lines:2002-2011
Source: NAIC.
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
MI WI MN
Minnesota: most variable
Wisconsin: least variable
12
Return on Net Worth, All Lines:2002-2011
Sources: NAIC.
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11
IL IN OH
Profit in Indiana is more volatile than
in neighboring states
Profit in Ohio is often higher than
in Illinois
13
Return on Net Worth, All Lines:2002-2011 Average, by State
Sources: NAIC.
10.1%
9.0% 8.9%8.2%
7.7%7.1%
5.2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
OH WI IN MN US IL MI
14
RNW PP Auto: MAF States,2002-2011, 10-year average
Sources: NAIC.
12.2%11.6%
10.1% 9.8%8.7%
-2.0%-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
MN OH WI IN IL MI
15
RNW HO: MAF States,2002-2011, 10-year average
Sources: NAIC.
10.1%
5.7%4.8%
-1.5%
-4.5% -5.0%-6%
-4%
-2%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
MI WI IL IN OH MN
16
RNW CMP: MAF States,2002-2011, 10-year average
Sources: NAIC.
14.7%
11.4%
10.0%9.1%
5.4%
3.5%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
MI OH IL WI IN MN
17
RNW WC: MAF States,2002-2011, 10-year average
Sources: NAIC.
9.7% 9.5%
6.6%
4.3%
3.4%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
IN MI MN OH WI IL
The Strength of the Economy Will Influence P/C Insurer
Growth Opportunities
18
Growth Will Expand Insurer Exposure Base Across Most Lines
18
19
Real Quarterly GDP Growth Sincethe “Great Recession, and Forecast
Forecasts from Blue Chip Economic Indicators; data are quarterly changes at annualized ratesSources: (history) US Department of Commerce, Blue Chip Economic Indicators 4/14; Insurance Information Institute.
0.1%
2.5%
1.3%
4.1%
2.0%
1.3%
3.1%
0.4%
2.5%
4.1%
2.6%
1.0%
2.4%
2.4%
2.3% 2.4% 2.6%
2.4%
2.4%
1.4%
1.3%
1.2% 1.5%
1.2% 1.0%
1.1%
1.0%
1.1%1.
4%5.
0%2.
3%2.
2% 2.6%
2.4%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
09:3
Q
09:4
Q
10:1
Q
10:2
Q
10:3
Q
10:4
Q
11:1
Q
11:2
Q
11:3
Q
11:4
Q
12:1
Q
12:2
Q
12:3
Q
12:4
Q
13:1
Q
13:2
Q
13:3
Q
13:4
Q
14:1
Q
14:2
Q
14:3
Q
14:4
Q
15:1
Q
15:2
Q
15:3
Q
15:4
Q
Demand for insurance continues to be affected by sluggish economic conditions, but the benefits of even slow growth will compound and
gradually benefit the economy broadly.
Additional growth forecast by average of 10 most optimistic
models
Growth forecast by average of
10 least optimistic
models
Even 3% real growth in a quarter has rarely been achieved since
the Great Recession ended
20
Millions of Units
Private Housing Unit Starts, 1990-2015F
1.4
8
1.4
7 1.6
2
1.6
4
1.5
7
1.6
0 1.7
1 1.8
5 1.9
6 2.0
7
1.8
0
1.3
6
0.9
1
0.5
5
0.5
9
0.6
1 0.7
8 0.9
3 1.0
8
1.3
1
1.3
51.4
6
1.2
9
1.2
0
1.0
11.1
9
0.3
0.5
0.7
0.9
1.1
1.3
1.5
1.7
1.9
2.1
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14F 15F
Sources: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (4/14); Insurance Information Institute.
Housing starts are rising, but this could be retarded by rising mortgage interest rates. Recently, the fastest growth is in multi-unit residences.
Personal lines exposure will grow, and commercial insurers with Workers Comp, Construction risk exposure, and Surety also benefit.
Housing unit starts plunged 72% from 2005-
2009, down 1.5 million, to lowest level since records
began in 1959
Job growth, improved credit
market conditions and demographics are boosting home
construction
21
Units in Multiple-Unit Projectsas Percent of Total
US: Pct. Of Private Housing Unit StartsIn Multi-Unit Projects, 1990-2013
21
.4%
23
.1%
21
.4%
20
.6%
21
.5%
20
.6%
20
.3%
18
.9%
17
.7%
17
.0%
18
.6%
22
.8% 31
.3%
19
.7%
19
.7% 2
9.3
%
31
.4%
33
.3%
20
.5%
17
.7%
12
.6%
14
.2%
17
.1%25
.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau; Insurance Information Institute.
For the U.S. as a whole, the trend toward multi-unit housing projects (vs. single-unit homes) is recent. Commercial insurers with Workers Comp,
Construction risk exposure, and Surety benefit.
Housing unit starts plunged 67% from 2005-
2009, down 128 thousand, to lowest level since
records began in 1959
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
$80
$90
1980
1981
1982
1983
1984
1985
1986
1987
1988
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
Net Worth of Households*Recently Hit A Historic High
*and nonprofit organizations. Data are as of year-end, not seasonally-adjusted or inflation-adjustedSource: Federal Reserve Board
2008-09 recession:
-15.7%
$ Trillions
2001 recession
1992 recession
1982 recession
Housing “bubble”Rising net worth feeds a “wealth
effect” that spurs consumer spending, which accounts for
70% of the U.S. economy
15.0%
15.5%
16.0%
16.5%
17.0%
17.5%
18.0%
18.5%
1990
:Q1
1990
:Q3
1991
:Q1
1991
:Q3
1992
:Q1
1992
:Q3
1993
:Q1
1993
:Q3
1994
:Q1
1994
:Q3
1995
:Q1
1995
:Q3
1996
:Q1
1996
:Q3
1997
:Q1
1997
:Q3
1998
:Q1
1998
:Q3
1999
:Q1
1999
:Q3
2000
:Q1
2000
:Q3
2001
:Q1
2001
:Q3
2002
:Q1
2002
:Q3
2003
:Q1
2003
:Q3
2004
:Q1
2004
:Q3
2005
:Q1
2005
:Q3
2006
:Q1
2006
:Q3
2007
:Q1
2007
:Q3
2008
:Q1
2008
:Q3
2009
:Q1
2009
:Q3
2010
:Q1
2010
:Q3
2011
:Q1
2011
:Q3
2012
:Q1
2012
:Q3
2013
:Q1
2013
:Q3
Household Financial ObligationsRatio Recently Hit A Historic Low
*through 2013:Q4 (data posted on March 18, 2013)Source: Federal Reserve Board, at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/housedebt
Financial Obligations Ratio: debt service (mortgage and consumer debt), auto lease, residence rent, HO insurance, and
property tax payments as % of personal disposable income.
Decline began in 2008:Q1.
Financial Obligations Ratio
15.23% in 2012:Q4is lowest ratio since 1980:Q4 (15.09%).
Household balance sheets are stronger than they’ve been in many years, setting the stage for more consumer spending
25
16.9
16.5
16.1
13.2
10.4
11.6
12.7
14.4
15.5 16
.0 16.416
.9
16.617
.117.5
17.8
17.4
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14F 15F
(Millions of Units)
Auto/Light Truck Sales, 1999-2015F
Source: U.S. Department of Commerce; Blue Chip Economic Indicators (4/14); Insurance Information Institute.
Yearly car/light truck sales will keep rising, in part replacing cars that were held onto in 2008-12. New vehicles will generate more physical
damage insurance coverage but will be more expensive to repair.PP Auto premium might grow by 6%.
New auto/light truck sales fell to the lowest level since the
late 1960s. Forecast for 2014-15 is even with the1999-2007
average of 16-17 million units.
It seems likely that we’re back to new vehicle sales
levels last seen pre-recession
26
Index of Total Industrial Production:*A New Peak at Year-end 2013
*Monthly, seasonally adjusted, through January 2014 (which is preliminary). Index based on year 2007 = 100Sources: Federal Reserve Board at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/g17/ipdisk/ip_sa.txt . National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
1/31
/19
90
1/31
/19
91
1/31
/19
92
1/31
/19
93
1/31
/19
94
1/31
/19
95
1/31
/19
96
1/31
/19
97
1/31
/19
98
1/31
/19
99
1/31
/20
00
1/31
/20
01
1/31
/20
02
1/31
/20
03
1/31
/20
04
1/31
/20
05
1/31
/20
06
1/31
/20
07
1/31
/20
08
1/31
/20
09
1/31
/20
10
1/31
/20
11
1/30
/20
12
1/31
/20
13
Recession
Peak at 100.82 in December 2007 (officially the 1st
month of the Great Recession)
Insurance exposures for industrial production will continue growing in 2014, and commercial insurance premium volume with them. Y-o-Y growth to October 2013 was
3.2%. Both production and premium volume growth for 2014 should exceed this.
26
December 2013 Index at 101.36,
a new peak
Many economists expect business
investment to rise in 2014
27
2.5%
4.9%
6.3%
7.8%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
2013 2014F 2015F 2016F
Business Investment* is Expected to Acceleratein 2014-16, Fueling Commercial Exposure Growth
Accelerating business investment will be a potent driver
of commercial property and liability insurance exposures
*consists of new orders of non-defense capital goods, excluding aircraft, plus buildings and software Sources: IHS Global Insights as of Jan.13, 2014; Insurance Information Institute.
Accelerating business investment should also drive employment and WC payroll exposures (with a lag).
28
$200,000
$300,000
$400,000
$500,000
Dollar Value* of Manufacturers’ Shipments Monthly, Jan. 1992—Jan. 2014
*seasonally adjusted; Jan. 2014 is preliminary; data published March 6, 2014.Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Full Report on Manufacturers’ Shipments, Inventories, and Orders, http://www.census.gov/manufacturing/m3/
Monthly shipments in Nov. 2013 exceeded the pre-crisis (July 2008) peak; Dec. 2013 and Jan. 2014 slipped a bit. Manufacturing is energy-intensive and growth leads to gains in many commercial exposures: WC, Commercial Auto, Marine,
Property, and various Liability Coverages.
$ Millions
28
The value of Manufacturing Shipments in Nov. 2013 was $493.9B—a new record high.
29
Value of Private Construction Put in Place, by Segment, Jan. 2014 vs. Jan. 2013*
17.0%
-3.9%
41.0%
1.7%7.8%
14.9%7.9%
0.9%
14.6%12.3%
47.8%
-10%0%
10%20%30%40%50%60%
Tota
l Priv
ate
Con
stru
ctio
n
Res
iden
tial
Pow
er
Man
ufac
turin
g
Com
mer
cial
Offi
ce
Hea
lth C
are
Com
mun
icat
ion
Edu
catio
nal
Lodg
ing
Tran
spor
tatio
n
Categories are arranged from largest dollar amounts (at left) to smaller.The drop in “power” construction is misleading since it follows a prior-
year surge. Hotel and home construction are up sharply.
Growth (%)
*seasonally adjusted; Nov and Dec are preliminary; Next release is Apr 1, 2014Source: U.S. Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/construction/c30/c30index.html ; Insurance Information Institute.
Construction activity is strong in several sectors and overall
30
Commercial & Industrial Loans Outstandingat FDIC-Insured Banks, Quarterly, 2006-2013:Q4*
$1.1
6$1
.18
$1.2
2
$1.4
4$1
.48
$1.4
9$1
.50
$1.4
9$1
.43
$1.3
7$1
.27
$1.2
1$1
.18
$1.1
7$1
.17
$1.1
8$1
.20
$1.2
4$1
.28 $1
.35
$1.3
7$1
.42
$1.4
5$1
.50
$1.5
2$1
.55
$1.5
7$1
.60
$1.1
3
$1.2
5$1
.30 $1
.39
$1.0
$1.1
$1.2
$1.3
$1.4
$1.5
$1.6
$1.7
06:Q
1
06:Q
3
07:Q
1
07:Q
3
08:Q
1
08:Q
3
09:Q
1
09:Q
3
10:Q
1
10:Q
3
11:Q
1
11:Q
3
12:Q
1
12:Q
3
13:Q
1
13:Q
3
Outstanding Commercial Loan Volume Has Been Growing for Over Two Years and Is Now Nearly Back to Early Recession Levels. Bodes Very Well
for the Creation of Current and Future Commercial Insurance Exposures*Latest data as of 3/4/2014.Source: FDIC at http://www2.fdic.gov/qbp/ (Loan Performance spreadsheet); Insurance Information Institute.
$Trillions
Commercial lending plunged by 21.2% ($330B) during the financial crisis and ensuing
period of tight credit
Commercial lending activity exceeds pre-crisis levels (+36.75% or $430B above
mid-2010 trough)
31
Percent of Non-current Commercial & Industrial Loans Outstanding at FDIC-Insured Banks,Quarterly, 2006-2013:Q4*
0.70
%0.
74%
0.64
%
0.67
%0.
81%
1.07
%1.
18% 1.
69% 2.
25% 2.
80%
3.57
%3.
43%
3.05
%2.
83%
2.73
%2.
44%
1.89
%1.
65%
1.49
%1.
29%
1.17
%1.
09%
0.98
%0.
88%
0.80
%0.
74%
0.72
%0.
62%
0.71
%
0.63
%0.
62%
0.63
%
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
06:Q
106
:Q2
06:Q
306
:Q4
07:Q
107
:Q2
07:Q
307
:Q4
08:Q
108
;Q2
08:Q
308
:Q4
09:Q
109
:Q2
09:Q
309
:Q4
10:Q
110
:Q2
10:Q
310
:Q4
11:Q
111
:Q2
11:Q
311
:Q4
12:Q
112
:Q2
12:Q
312
:Q4
13:Q
113
:Q2
13:Q
313
:Q4
Non-current loans (those past due 90 days or more or in nonaccrual status) are back to early-recession levels, fueling bank willingness to lend.
*Latest data as of 3/4/2014.Source: FDIC at http://www2.fdic.gov/qbp/ (Loan Performance spreadsheet); Insurance Information Institute.
Back to “normal” levels of noncurrent industrial
& commercial loans
Recession
32
Near-term growth forecasts vary
widely by state. Strongest growth
= blue, then dark green;weakest = beige
State-by-State Leading Indicatorsthrough 2014:Q2
33
Labor Market Trends
Massive Job Losses Sapped the Economy and
Commercial/Personal Lines Exposure, But Trend is Improving
33
34
Unemployment and Underemployment Rates: Still Too High, But Falling
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
Jan00
Jan01
Jan02
Jan03
Jan04
Jan05
Jan06
Jan07
Jan08
Jan09
Jan10
Jan11
Jan12
Jan13
Jan14
"Headline" Unemployment Rate U-3
Unemployment + Underemployment RateU-6
“Headline” unemployment
was 6.7% in March 2014.4% to 6% is “normal.”
Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
U-6 went from 8.0% in March
2007 to 17.5% in October 2009; Stood at 12.7% in Mar. 2014.8% to 10% is
“normal.”
January 2000 through March 2014, Seasonally Adjusted (%)
Stubbornly high unemployment and underemployment constrain overall economic growth, but the job market is now clearly improving.
34
35
Feb. 2014 Unemployment Ratesin Midwest States Vary Widely*
8.7%
7.7%
6.7% 6.5%6.1% 6.1%
4.8%
0%
3%
5%
8%
10%
IL MI US OH IN WI MN
*State data are provisional, seasonally adjusted.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute.
70
16
82
12
32
21
02
21
71
06 12
22
21
18
31
64 1
96
36
02
26 24
39
6 11
08
81
60
15
01
61
22
52
03
21
41
97
28
01
41
20
31
99
20
11
49
20
21
64
23
7 27
48
41
44
19
71
92
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
Jan-1
1
Feb
-11
Mar-
11
Apr-
11
May-1
1
Jun-1
1
Jul-1
1
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct-
11
Nov-1
1
Dec-1
1
Jan-1
2
Feb
-12
Mar-
12
Apr-
12
May-1
2
Jun-1
2
Jul-1
2
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct-
12
Nov-1
2
Dec-1
2
Jan-1
3
Feb
-13
Mar-
13
Apr-
13
May 1
3
Jun-1
3
Jul-1
3
Aug
-13
Sep
-13
Oct-
13
Nov-1
3
Dec 1
3
Jan 1
4
Feb
14
Mar
14
Nonfarm Employment, Monthly Change,2011 - 2014
Thousands
The pace of job growth varies considerably from month to month but, on average, has been rising in each of the past three years.
Seasonally adjusted. February 2014 and March 2014 are preliminary data.Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics; Insurance Information Institute 36
Average Monthly Gain2011: 173,600 2012: 186,300 2013: 194,250
37
Nonfarm Payroll (Wages and Salaries):Quarterly, 2005–2013
Note: Recession indicated by gray shaded column. Data are seasonally adjusted annual rates.Sources: http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/WASCUR; National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institute.
Billions
$5,500
$5,750
$6,000
$6,250
$6,500
$6,750
$7,000
$7,250
$7,50005
:Q1
05:Q
205
:Q3
05:Q
406
:Q1
06:Q
206
:Q3
06:Q
407
:Q1
07:Q
207
:Q3
07:Q
408
:Q1
08:Q
208
:Q3
08:Q
409
:Q1
09:Q
209
:Q3
09:Q
410
:Q1
10:Q
210
:Q3
10:Q
411
:Q1
11:Q
211
:Q3
11:Q
412
:Q1
12:Q
212
:Q3
12:Q
413
:Q1
13:Q
213
:Q3
13:Q
4
Prior Peak was 2008:Q3 at $6.54 trillion
Latest (2013:Q4) was $7.23 trillion, a
new peak--$1T above 2009 trough
Recent trough (2009:Q1) was $6.23 trillion, down
5.3% from prior peak
Growth rates2011:Q4 over 2010:Q4: 2.7%2012:Q4 over 2011:Q4: 6.0%2013:Q3 over 2012:Q3: 3.6%
37
Full-time vs. Part-time Employment,Quarterly, 2003-2013: WC Implications
110
113
116
119
122
2003
.120
03.2
2003
.320
03.4
2004
.120
04.2
2004
.320
04.4
2005
.120
05.2
2005
.320
05.4
2006
.120
06.2
2006
.320
06.4
2007
.120
07.2
2007
.320
07.4
2008
.120
08.2
2008
.320
08.4
2009
.120
09.2
2009
.320
09.4
2010
.120
10.2
2010
.320
10.4
2011
.120
11.2
2011
.320
11.4
2012
.120
12.2
2012
.320
12.4
2013
.120
13.2
2013
.320
13.4
24
25
26
27
28
Full-time Part-time
Sources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, US Department of Labor; Insurance Information Institute.
The Great Recession shifted employment from full-time to part-time, and the recovery to date hasn’t changed that. Full-time employment is still 4.2 million
below its pre-recession peak, but part-time recently reached a new peak.
Millions Millions
Recession
Recession shifted employment growth from
full-time to part-time
Pre-recession, most new jobs were full-time
39
Construction Employment,Jan. 2010—February 2014*
*Seasonally adjusted; Jan. and Feb. 2014 are preliminarySources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
5,58
75,
508
5,53
65,
555
5,52
45,
512
5,50
25,
525
5,50
35,
507
5,50
45,
462
5,43
25,
464
5,47
55,
496
5,52
05,
524
5,55
15,
553 5,59
05,
584
5,58
55,
606
5,62
75,
622
5,62
75,
630
5,61
35,
620
5,63
55,
647
5,64
85,
666
5,68
75,
720
5,74
3 5,78
95,
813
5,81
15,
816
5,82
95,
830
5,83
65,
849
5,86
45,
896
5,87
6 5,92
65,
941
5,400
5,500
5,600
5,700
5,800
5,900
6,000
Jan-
10F
eb-1
0M
ar-1
0A
pr-1
0M
ay-1
0Ju
n-10
Jul-1
0A
ug-1
0S
ep-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-1
0D
ec-1
0Ja
n-11
Feb
-11
Mar
-11
Apr
-11
May
-11
Jun-
11Ju
l-11
Aug
-11
Sep
-11
Oct
-11
Nov
-11
Dec
-11
Jan-
122/
30/2
Mar
-12
Apr
-12
May
-12
Jun-
12Ju
l-12
Aug
-12
Sep
-12
Oct
-12
Nov
-12
Dec
-12
Jan-
132/
29/2
Mar
-13
Apr
-13
May
-13
Jun-
13Ju
l-13
Aug
-13
Sep
-12
Oct
-13
Nov
-13
Dec
-13
Jan-
14F
eb-1
4
Construction employment is now +509,000 above
Jan. 2011 (+9.4%).
(Thousands)
Construction and manufacturing employment constitute 1/3 of all payroll exposure.
40
Manufacturing Employment,Jan. 2010—February 2014*
11
,46
21
1,4
53
11
,45
81
1,4
93
11
,52
71
1,5
43
11
,57
11
1,5
50
11
,55
71
1,5
57
11
,58
11
1,5
92
11
,62
01
1,6
53
11
,67
51
1,7
04
11
,71
11
1,7
23
11
,75
51
1,7
63
11
,76
61
1,7
73
11
,77
11
1,7
98
11
,83
71
1,8
59
11
,90
11
1,9
16
11
,92
81
1,9
39
11
,97
91
1,9
56
11
,94
21
1,9
47
11
,95
11
1,9
65
11
,98
21
2,0
04
12
,00
71
2,0
01
11
,99
41
1,9
91
11
,98
21
1,9
90
11
,99
31
2,0
11
12
,04
61
2,0
53
12
,05
91
2,0
65
11,250
11,500
11,750
12,000
12,250Ja
n-1
0F
eb
-10
Ma
r-1
0A
pr-
10
Ma
y-1
0Ju
n-1
0Ju
l-1
0A
ug
-10
Se
p-1
0O
ct-1
0N
ov-
10
De
c-1
0Ja
n-1
1F
eb
-11
Ma
r-1
1A
pr-
11
Ma
y-1
1Ju
n-1
1Ju
l-1
1A
ug
-11
Se
p-1
1O
ct-1
1N
ov-
11
De
c-1
1Ja
n-1
22
/30
/2M
ar-
12
Ap
r-1
2M
ay-
12
Jun
-12
Jul-
12
Au
g-1
2S
ep
-12
Oct
-12
No
v-1
2D
ec-
12
Jan
-13
Fe
b-1
3M
ar-
13
Ap
r-1
3M
ay-
13
Jun
-13
Jul-
13
Au
g-1
3S
ep
-13
Oct
-13
No
v-1
3D
ec-
13
Jan
-14
Fe
b-1
4
Manufacturing employment is a surprising source of strength in the economy. Employment in the sector is at a multi-year high.
*Seasonally adjusted; Jan.and Feb 2013 are preliminarySources: US Bureau of Labor Statistics at http://data.bls.gov; Insurance Information Institute.
(Thousands) Since Jan 2010, manufacturing employment
is up (+550,000 or +4.6%)and still growing.
Winter Storms and Other Natural Catastrophes
41
Have You Noticed It’s Been Coldand Snowy Lately?
41
Significant Natural Catastrophes in 2013 ($1 billion economic loss and/or 50 fatalities)
Date Event
Estimated Economic
Losses (US $m)
Estimated Insured Losses (US $m)
February 24 – 25 Winter Storm 1,300 690
March 18 – 19 Thunderstorms 2,200 1,600
April 7 – 11 Winter Storm 1,600 1,200
April 16 – 18 Thunderstorms 1,100 560
May 18 – 20 Thunderstorms 3,100 1,800
May 28 – 31 Thunderstorms 2,800 1,400
August 6 – 7 Thunderstorms 1,300 740
September 9 – 16 Flooding 1,500 160
November 17 - 18 Thunderstorms 1,300 931
Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 42© 2014 Munich Re
As of December 31, 2013
Number of Events Fatalities
Estimated Overall Losses (US $m)
Estimated Insured Losses (US $m)
SevereThunderstorm
69 110 16,341 10,274
Winter Storm 11 43 2,935 1,895
Flood 19 23 1,929 240
Earthquake & Geophysical
6 1 Minor Minor
Tropical Cyclone 1 1 Minor Minor
Wildfire, Heat, & Drought
22 29 620 385
Totals 128 207 21,825 12,794
Natural Disaster Lossesin the United States, 2013
43Source: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE 43© 2014 Munich Re
Largest Insured Claims, Individual Winter Storms, US & Canada, 1980-2013
Storm Dates Economic Loss ($2013, mil)
Insured Loss ($2013, mil)
Deaths
Mar. 11-14, 1983 $8,061 $3,224 270
Dec. 17-30, 1983 $2,339 $2,058 500
Apr. 13-17, 2007 $2,247 $1,775 23
Dec. 10-13, 1992 $4,981 $1,660 19
Jan. 5-12, 1998 $4,146 $1,644 45
Feb. 10-12, 1994 $4,716 $1,258 9
Jan. 17-20, 1994 $1,572 $1,258 70
Apr. 7-11, 2013 $1,600 $1,200 N/A
Jan. 1-4, 1999 $1,398 $1,084 25
Jan 31-Feb 2, 2011 $1,346 $1,010 36
44
Sources: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE, Insurance Information Institute
45Sources: Munich Re NatCatSERVICE; Insurance Information Institute.
Winter Storm and Winter Damage Events in the US and Canada, 1980-2013 (2013 US$)
1993, ‘94, & ‘96: 3 of the 4 costliest years for insured losses from winter storms and damage.
In 2013, insured losses from
severe winter events:
$2 billion.
Insured winter storm and damage losses in Jan. 2014 already totaled $1.5 billion. Continued severe weather since then makes it likely that
2014 will become one of the top 5 costliest winters since 1980.
Insured Losses (Millions, $ 2013)
5-year running average
Source: Property Claims ServiceMunich Re NatCatSERVICE
US Thunderstorm Loss TrendsInsured Annual Totals 1980 – 2013
Average insured thunderstorm losses have increased sevenfold since 1980.
2013 Total: $10.3 bn
46© 2014 Munich Re
Investment Performance: a Key Driver of Profitability
47
Depressed Yields Influence Underwriting & Pricing
47
Property/Casualty Insurance Industry Net Investment Gain: 1994–2013:Q31
$35.4
$42.8$47.2
$52.3
$44.4
$36.0
$45.3$48.9
$59.4$55.7
$64.0
$31.7
$39.2
$53.4$56.2
$53.9 $53.
9$58.0
$51.9$56.9
$0
$10
$20
$30
$40
$50
$60
$70
94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05* 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13E
Investment gains are expected to show a modest growth in 2013 with higher realized capital gains more than offsetting declining investment income. The
financial crisis caused net investment gains to fall by 50% in 2008.
1 Investment gains consist primarily of interest, stock dividends and realized capital gains and losses.* 2005 figure includes special one-time dividend of $3.2B; Sources: ISO; Insurance Information Institute.
($ Billions)
Investment gains in 2013 are running an estimated 16% below their pre-crisis peak
49
U.S. Treasury 2- and 10-Year Note Yields*: 1990–2014
*Monthly, constant maturity, nominal rates, through February 2014.Sources: Federal Reserve Bank at http://www.federalreserve.gov/releases/h15/data.htm. National Bureau of Economic Research (recession dates); Insurance Information Institutes.
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
1/31
/19
90
1/31
/19
91
1/31
/19
92
1/31
/19
93
1/31
/19
94
1/31
/19
95
1/31
/19
96
1/31
/19
97
1/31
/19
98
1/31
/19
99
1/31
/20
00
1/31
/20
01
1/31
/20
02
1/31
/20
03
1/31
/20
04
1/31
/20
05
1/31
/20
06
1/31
/20
07
1/31
/20
08
1/31
/20
09
1/31
/20
10
1/31
/20
11
1/30
/20
12
1/31
/20
13
Recession2-Yr Yield10-Yr Yield
Yields on 10-Year U.S. Treasury Notes have been essentially below 5% for a full decade.
Since roughly 80% of P/C bond/cash investments are in 10-year or shorter durations, most P/C insurer portfolios will have low-yielding bonds for years to come.
U.S. Treasury 10-year note
yields recently “spiked” up
49
50
Distribution of Bond Maturities,P/C Insurance Industry, 2003-2012
Sources: SNL Financial; Insurance Information Institute.
The main shift over these years has been from bonds with longer maturities to bonds with shorter maturities. The industry first trimmed its holdings of over-10-year bonds
(from 24.6% in 2003 to 15.5% in 2012) and then trimmed bonds in the 5-10-year category (from 31.3% in 2003 to 27.6% in 2012) . Falling average maturity of the P/C industry’s bond portfolio is contributing to a drop in investment income along with lower yields.
www.iii.org
Thank you for your timeand your attention!
Insurance Information Institute Online:
53