pd catalyzed c-c coupling reactions- a short introduction (nobel prize 2010)
TRANSCRIPT
Palladium-Catalyzed Cross-Coupling
Reactions
2010 Nobel Prize Awarded to
Richard Heck, Ei-ichi Negishi, and
Akira SuzukiSonam Vijay Sancheti
Alfred Nobel
Introduction
Nobel prize for their roles in discovering and
developing highly practical methodologies for C-C bond
construction.
Strategies and methods of organic synthesis
irreversibly changed for the modern chemist, both in
academia and in industry, due to their original
contributions in the early 1970s
Growth in the number of publications and patents on named reaction components metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions.
2
History of C-C coupling
1855: Wurtz coupling (Sodium metal catalyzed homodimerization)
1862: Fitting couplig (Sodium metal catalyzed homodimerization)
1901: Ullmann Coupling (Copper catalyzed homodimerization)
1914: Bennett and Turner (chromium(III) chloride , homodimerization)
1939: Meerwein arylations (CuCl2 catalyzed cross coupling)
1943: Kharasch coupling (Cobalt chloride based homodimerization)
Cross Coupling: Selectivity problem
3
Selective Cross Coupling History
Kl 1957: Cadiot and
Chodkiewicz
1963 : Castro–
Stephens
1963 : Castro–
Stephens
4
The Palladium Complexes as Cross-Coupling
Catalysts
• High toxicity of the
organomercury reagents
• Lack of an obligatory
preformed organometallic
species as one of the
coupling partners.
• The independent and
almost concurrent
discoveries
by Mizoroki and Heck
5
Extension of Heck reaction
Heck Reaction uses harsh conditions
Requires only catalytic quantities of transition metals
Homocoupling avoided. So higher selectivity
Harsh conditions
Harsh conditions
Reaction conditions
exceedingly milder
8
Organoaluminum reagents: deterioration of stereospecificity
Magnesium and Lithium could be replaced with other metals that
were capable of participating in the proposed transmetallation step.
Organoaluminium
reagents:
Both Ni and Pd
catalysts are used
Organozinc reagents:
- Mild route
- Impressive
functional group
compatibility
10
• Negishi and co-workers carried out metal-screening regimens to
identify other possible organometallic reagents as coupling partners.
11
The Stille Reaction (1978)
Milder reaction
conditions
Main disadvantage of Migits-stille Reaction:
TOXICITY OF ORGANOSTANNANES
Organostannane
coupling parteners
12
Several Advantages of Suzuki Coupling Reactions:
Ready availability of reagents: hydroboration and transmetalation
Mild reaction conditions
Easy use of the reaction both in aqueous and heterogeneous conditions
Toleration of a broad range of functional groups
High regio- and stereoselectivity of the reaction
Insignificant effect of the steric hindrance
Use of a small amount of catalysts
Application in one-pot synthesis
Nontoxic reaction
Easy separation of inorganic boron compounds
15
Organosilicon coupling parteners
Hiyama coupling provided more environmentally friendly and safe
than organoboron, organozinc and organostannane.
The Hiyama Reaction (1988–1994)
16
Increasing functional group compatibility, broadening substrate scope
Employing cross coupling in synthesis of biologically important
molecules
Following are industrial applications
Recent Work Going…
17
C(sp3)-C(sp3) and C(sp2)-C(sp3) cross-coupling reactions
Selective mono α-arylation
Stoichiometric amount of base required, makes process non-green
Use of alternative metals with good results
This reaction also awaits the development of more practical and
economical conditions and procedures for application in large-scale
syntheses whilst finding robust solutions to the selectivity issues
encountered for less straightforward coupling partners.
Coupling Reactions: Challenges…
18
References
• For Nobel Lecture, E. Negishi, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123,6870 – 6897
• For Nobel Lecture, A. Suzuki, Angew. Chem. 2011, 123,6854 – 6869
• N. Miyaura, T. Ishiyama, M. Ishikawa, A. Tetrahedron Lett. 1986, 27, 6369 – 6372.
• R. F. Heck, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1968, 90, 5518 – 5526
• A. Suzuki , Journal of Organometallic Chemistry , 2002,653, 83-90
• A. Suzuki , 1995–1998 Journal of Organometallic Chemistry 576 (1999) 147–168
• R. F. Heck, Contribution from the Research Center of Hercules Inc., Wilmington, Delaware
19899. Received December 7, 1967
• R. F. Heck, Contribution from the Research Center of Hercules, Inc.,Wilmington, Delaware
19899. Received April 7, 1969
• T. Ishiyama, N. Matsuda, N. Miyaura, A. Suzuki, J. Am. Chem.Soc. 1993, 115, 11018 –
11019.
• H. Matsushita, E. Negishi, J. Org. Chem. 1982, 47, 4161 –4165
• Review: E. Negishi, Acc. Chem. Res. 1982, 15, 340 – 348.
• R. Heck, J. P. Nolley, Jr., J. Org. Chem. 1972, 37,2320 – 2322.
• C. C . Carin, J. Seechurn, M. Kitching, T. J. Colacot, and V. Snieckus, Angew. Chem. Int.
Ed. 2012, 51, 5062 – 5085
19