pe test geotechnical rerview
TRANSCRIPT
PE Refresher CoursePE Refresher CourseGeotechnical ComponentGeotechnical Component
Class 1Class 1
Notes available at:www.ce.washington.edu/~geotech
OrganizationLecture No. 1
Basics (Chapter 35)Soil classificationPhase diagramsSoil properties
CompactionPermeabilityConsolidationShear strength
Applications (Chapter 35, 40)Settlement problemsMagnitude of settlementRate of settlement
OrganizationLecture No. 2 Applications ( Chapters 36, 37, 38, 39, 40)
Seepage problemsSlope stability problemsFoundations
Shallow FoundationDeep foundations
Retaining structuresRetaining walls Braced excavations
Grain Size and Plasticity Characteristics
Grain Size CharacteristicsSieve Analysis
Coefficient of UniformityCu = D60/D10
Coefficient of CurvatureC z = (D30)2 / (D 60 x D10)Soil Cu Cz
GravelFine sandCoarse sandMixture of silty sand and gravelMixture of clay, sand, silt and gravel
>45-104-615-30025-1000
1-31-3
Grain Size and Plasticity Characteristics
Hydrometer AnalysisRelates particle size to settling velocity Used to determine size of -#200 fraction
Plasticity CharacteristicsPlastic Limit - lowest water content at which soil exhibits plastic behaviorLiquid limit - highest water content at which soil exhibits plastic behaviorPlasticity Index
Pl = LL - PLClassification of fine-grained soils often based on plasticity characteristics as described by liquid limit and plasticity index
Initial classification generally based on grain size Gravel Large grain size ( 4.75mm – 75mm)SandSiltClayOrganics small grain size (.075mm – 4.75mm)
USDA (US Department of Agriculture) Triangle identification chart - easy to use Good for gardening (plant in loam)
AASHTO (Am Assoc of State Highway Trans Officials) Based on suitability of soil for use as pavement base
Divides soil types into 8 groups, A-1 through A-8Granular soils (gravels and sands) fall into A-1 through A-3
Differentiated primarily on basis of grain size distributionFine-grained soils (silts and clays) fall into A-4 through A-7.
Differentiated primarily on basis of plasticity characteristics Highly organic soils fall into A-8
Subgroups depend on grain size and plasticity characteristics - See Table 9.2 Group index added in parentheses after group and subgroup classification. Group index calculated by Eq. 35.3 ( sub-grade suitability decreases with increasing group index).
Soil Classification (Section 9.3)
USCS (Unified Soil Classification System)soils are classified on basis of parameters which influence their engineering
properties .Coarse – grained soils (gravels and sands) classified on basis of grain size
characteristics Fine-grained soils (silts and clays) classified on basis of plasticity
characteristics.Symbols:
G GravelS SandM siltC ClayO Organic
Modifiers: W Well GradedP Poorly GradedH High PlasticityL Low Plasticity
Examples: GW Well-graded gravelSP Poorly-graded (uniform) sandMH Highly plastic siltCL Low plasticity clayGM Silty gravel
Sieve Size Soils 1, % Finer
Soil 2, % Finer
Soil 3, % Finer
No. 4 99 97 100No. 10 92 90 100No. 40 86 40 100No. 100 78 8 99No. 200 60 5 97LL 20 - 124PL 15 - 47PI 5 NP* 77* non-plastic
Given:Sieve analysis and plasticity data for the following three soils classify the soils
Example
Soil 1> 50% passes #200 - Fine-grained LL=20, Pl=5 - plots in CL-ML (p. 35.6)
Soil 2< 50% passes #200 - Coarse-grained> 50% passes #4 - SandD60 = 0.71 mmD30 = 0.34 mmD10 = 0.18 mm
SP - SMSoil 3> 50% passes #200 - Fine -grainedLL=124 Pl=77 - Off the chart - Extrapolating gives CHCould be CH-MH
0 71 3 90 18
u.C ..
0 342 10 18 0 71
c.C
( . )( . )
Aggregate Soil Properties (Phase Diagrams)
Phase DiagramsSolid, Water, and Gas phases shown separatelyVolumes indicated on left side of phase diagram Weights indicated on right side of phase diagram
GasWaterSolid
Vg
Vw
Vs
VvVt
O
Ww
Ws
Wt
DefinitionsVoid Ratio e = Vv/Vs
Porosity n = Vv/Vt
Water Content w = Ww/Ws
Degree of Saturation S = Vw/Wv
Density* ρ= Mass/VolumeUnit Weight* γ= weight/VolumeSpecific Gravity G = ρs/ρw
*Review text lumps density and unit weight together and uses symbol ρ
Common practice is to assume Vs = 1,
then express other volumes and weights accordingly.
Gas
Water
Solid
wGs
1
ewGsρw
Gsρw
Moist unit weight
ρm = Wt/Vt
Dry unit weight (dry density)
ρd = Ws/Vt
Saturated unit weight
ρsat = ρm for S=100%
Buoyant unit weight
ρsub = ρsat - ρw
From definitions
1en
es w
mG ρ( 1+w)ρ = 1+e
md
ρρ =1+w
swGS
es w
dG ρρ = 1+e
Table 35.7 - Useful for rapid calculation of phase relationships
Given: e = 0.62 w = 15% Gs = 2.65Calculate: a. ⍴d
b. ⍴m
c. w for S = 100%d. ⍴sat for S = 100%
s wmm
m
G ρ( 1+w )W ( 2.65 ) ( 62.4 pcf ) ( 1.15 )b.) ρ = = = =117pcfV 1+e 1.62
s s wd
m
W G ρa.) ρ = =V 1+e( 2.65 ) ( 62.4 pcf ) = 1.62
=102 pcf
Example
Gas
Water
Solid
wGs
1
ewGsρw= Seρw
Gsρw
ss
e 0.62c.) For S =100%,e =w G w= = =23.3%G 2.65
s w w s wsat
G ρ +S e ρ ( G +S e ) ρ ( 2.65+( 1.00 ) ( 0.62 ) )( 62.4 pcf )d.) ρ = = =1+e 1+e 1.62 =126 pcf
Standard Penetration Test140lb hammer dropped 30" to drive standard sampler. Number of blowsrequired for 12" penetration measured as standard penetration resistance, N.Crude test but useful index of soil characteristics. More useful in sands than in fine-grained soils.
Moisture-Density Tests and RelationshipsCompaction Tests
Proctor Test Modified Proctor Test
Density of soil for given compactive effort Influenced by water content Density of soil for given water content influenced by level of compactive effort
Soil Testing and Mechanical Properties
⍴d
w
Increasing E⍴d
woptw
(⍴d)max
Field Density Tests
Direct
Backscattering
Consolidation Test
Procedure:• Apply vertical load in increments.
• During each increment, measure change in height of specimen as function of time.
• At end of each increment when settlement stops,• measure change in height of specimen as function of vertical stress.
Measure deformation of sample with time
Plot: Change in equilibrium void ratio w/ stress
settlement magnitude informatione
Change in void ratio w/time for stressIncrement settlement rate information
Apply increment of stress
e0
ef
P0 Pf Log p
Initial equilibrium
Final equilibrium
e0
ef
time
Initial equilibrium
Final equilibrium
Fast rate
Slow rate
Consolidation Parameters
Compression Index, CcGiven by slope of e-log p curve (NC portion)
Recompression Index, CrGiven by slope of rebound portion of curve (OC portion)
Coefficient of Consolidation, Cv
ei
ef
High Cv (fast settlement)Low Cv (slow settlement)
time
e
Cc
Cr
Log p
e Normally consolidated
Over-consolidated
Shear strength influenced by pore fluid drainage Free drainage during loading drained No drainage during loading undrained
Mohr – Coulomb Failure Criterion
friction
cohesion
c
s
For drained loading, c = 0
S
Typical for sands
S =c +σtan
Shear Strength of soils
For un-drained loading,
0
S
Typical for clayscSnc
Shear Strength and Principal Stresses
Ϭ3 Ϭ1 Ϭ
Շ
c
Փ
Failure surface is always oriented at 45 + Փ/2 angleto minor principal stress axis
21 3σ =σ tan( 45+ /2) + 2c tan( 45+ /2)
23 1σ =σ tan( 45+ /2) + 2c tan( 45+ /2)
At failure
Shear strength
Shear stress
failure
45+/2
Generally fall into one (or both) of two categories:
• Magnitude of settlement
• Rate of settlement
Must be able to :
1. Evaluate initial effective stress conditions
2. Evaluate change in effective stress due to imposed loading
3. Determine appropriate soil properties
4. Perform calculations
APPLICATIONS
Settlement Problems
Evaluation of Initial Effective Stresses
Need to know Thickness of soil layersDensity of soil layersGroundwater level
For effective stresses, use ρm above water table ρsub below water table
or calculate total stress and subtract water pressure
For total stresses, use ρm above water table ρsat below water table
For water pressure, take product of ρw and depth below water table
''
uu
Example
10’e = 0.40w = 10%zLayer 1
Layer 25'
15'
e = 0.60S = 20%S = 100%
First, calculate soil densities
s wm1
s
s wm2
s wsub
G ρ ( 1+w ) ( 2.7 ) ( 62.4 ) ( 1.1 )Layer1:ρ = = =132pcf1+e 1.4S e ( 0.2 ) ( 0.6 )Layer 2( abovewt): w= = =0.044=4.4%G 2.7
G ρ ( 1+w )ρ = =110pcf1+e( G -1 ) ρ ( 1.7 ) ( 62.4 )Layer2( belowwt ):ρ = = =66pcf1+e 1.6
Then, calculate stresses
At
v m1
v m1
v v m2
At z =5ft. σ =ρ z =( 132pcf )( 5ft )=660psfAt z =10ft. σ =ρ z =( 132pcf )( 10ft )=1,320psfAt z =15ft. σ =σ( z =10 ft )+ρ ( z -10 ft )
=1,320psf +( 110pcf )( 15 -10 )=1,870psfz =
v v sub20ft σ =σ ( z =15 ft )+ ρ ( z -15 ft )=1,870psf +( 66pcf )( 20 -15 )=2,200psf
Change in effective stresses can be caused by:
1. External loading Placement of fill (Ϭ‘v up ) settlementConstruction of structure (Ϭ‘v up ) settlementExcavation (Ϭ‘v down ) rebound
2. Change in groundwater conditions Drawdown of water level – (Ϭ‘v up ) settlementRising water level (Ϭ‘v down ) rebound
1. Calculation of final effective stresses after u excess dissipates
Based on assumption of hydrostatic water pressures, u = ρw (z-zw)Proceed in same way as for initial effective stresses
• Two important cases:
1. Areal loads – vertical stress = f (z) only (large areal extent w /r /t thickness of soil layer)
2. Local loads – vertical stress = f (x, y, z) Must compute stress distribution
Evaluation of Change in Effective Stresses
Areal Load
Assume 5-ft-thick fill placed on top of previous two-layered soil deposit. Tests show ρm=120 pcf.
5‘ ρm= 120
10‘ z ρ m= 132
5‘ ρ m= 110
15‘ ρ sub= 66
The increase in stress produced by an areal load is constant with depth
Local Load
Spread footing imposes uniform load of 1,000 psf over 10 ft x 10 ft area
What is σv' different below edge of footing than below center. Different at depth than shallow
v
At z =20σ =( 5 )( 120 pcf ) +( 10 )( 132 pcf ) +( 5 )( 110 pcf ) +( 5 )( 66 pcf ) =2,800 psf
Examples
Z=20’
Stress Distribution
Important to be able to calculate subsurface stresses caused by loads or loaded areas on the ground surface. Usually interested for settlement calculation problems.Generally accomplished by stress distribution methods based on theory of elasticity.Can use principle of superposition very useful.
Boussinesq – stresses caused by point load on surface. Boussinesq solution widely used For point load, use Eq. 40.1
Example 1For strip footing loads, use Appendix 40a (left)
Example 2For square footing loads, use Appendix 40a (right)
Example 3 For circular loaded areas, use Appendix 40b
Example 4 For loaded areas of arbitrary shape, use (Newmark)
Influence chart method – see Fig 40 3
Influence Chart Represents entire ground surface Divided into number of “squares” – see Fig 40.3 Squares set up so that uniform load on each would cause same stress on subsurface point below center of chart
Example 1Calculate vertical stress 5 ft. below and 2 ft. to the side of a surface point load of 1,000 lbs.
1000 lbs
2'
5'P v
2
2
11
11 0 4
( )
( . )
r z
5/2
v 2
5/2
2
3PP =2π z3( 1000)=2π ( 5 )
=13.2 psf
Example 2Calculate the vertical stress at a depth of 15 feet below the edge of a 5-foot-wide strip footing which imposes a bearing pressure of 2,000 psf on the ground surface.
15'Pv 0.2p
Chart in Appendix 40A p. A-69 (left side)
2,000 psf
vP =0.2( 2000psf )=400 psf
15 =3B5
5'
PLOT 40.A
14'Pv
Example 3Calculate the vertical stress at a depth of 14 feet below the center of a 4 ft. square footing that applies 10,000 psf bearing pressure to the ground surface
4 '
0.04p
10,000 psf
B.534
14=
vP =( 0.04 ) ( 10,000 psf)=400 psf
p. 40.ARight side
PLOT 40.A
14'Pv
Example 3Calculate the vertical stress at a depth of 14 feet below the center of a 4 ft. square footing that applies 10,000 psf bearing pressure to the ground surface
4 '
0.04p
10,000 psf
B.534
14=
vP =( 0.04 ) ( 10,000 psf)=400 psf
p. 40.ARight side
Example 4A 16 ft diameter water tank contains 20 feet of water. Calculate the vertical stress caused by the tank at a point 8 feet below the ground surface and 10 feet from the center of the tank.
8' Pv
16 ft
10'
p=( 20 ) ( 62.4 pcf )=1248 psf
x =1.25rz =1.0r
20= .I
I = 0.2
01= .rz
251= .rx
vP =Ip= 0.2 1248 psf =250 psf
Appendix Dp. 40.B
PLOT 40.B
Determination of appropriate soil properties
Initial Conditions
Final Conditions
Cc or Cr
e
e1
e2
p1 p2 Log p
Compute Cc or Cr from e-log p curveConsolidation test
Cc applies to normally consolidated range
Cr applies to over-consolidated range
Pre-consolidation Pressure, Pp
Maximum effective stress under which soil has ever been in equilibrium
Soil is normally consolidated when current effective stress is equal to current value of pre-consolidation pressure.
Settlement behavior controlled by Cc
Soil is over-consolidated when current effective stress is less than current value of pre-consolidation pressure.
Settlement behavior controlled by Cr.
Pre-consolidation Pressure, P'p
P'1 P'2 Log p
ee1
e2
Cr
Cc
Pre-consolidation Pressure, PpDisturbance Effects
Pre-consolidation Pressure, PpCasagrande Method
Calculation of Settlement MagnitudeNeed: 1. Initial and final effective stresses
2. Definition of Cc and Cr
p 1r
p1
e -eC = Plog( )P
ultv
1
ΔeΔH∈= =H 1+e
3. Definition of vertical strain
cr p 2ult
1 p1 1 1
CC PΔe PΔH = H= Hlog( )+ Hlog( )P P1+e 1+e 1+e
2 pc
2p
e -eC = Plog( )P
poc p 1 r
1
PΔe =e -e =C log( )P
nce
2NC 2 p c
p
oc
PΔe =e -e =C log( )Pe = e
P‘1P‘2
Log p
ee1
e2
P‘p
ep
OC NCinitial
final
d
s w
d
ssub w
125 pcf= =113.6pcf1+0.10Ge = -1=0.48
G -1= =71.7pcf1+e
oP =( 3 ft )( 125pcf ) +( 2 ft )( 71.7pcf ) +( 2.5 ft )( 30pcf )=593psf
First, calculate initial effective stress at center of soft clay layer before new fill placed
f oP =P +( 4 ft )( 125pcf ) = 593psf +500psf =1093psfNext, calculate final stress after placement of new fill
Then, calculate ultimate settlement as
c fult
oo
C PΔH = Hlog P1+e1.06 1093= 5ft log3.53 593
=0.40ft=4.8in
Example 5
Calculate the ultimate settlement of the soft clay layer due to placement of the new fill
4'
3'
2'
5'
New Fill = 125 pcf; w= 10%
Old FillSame properties as new fill
Soft ClayCc=1.06 eo=2.53 sub = 30 pcf
Dense Sand
Now, what would happen if half of the new fill was removed?
'i
o
'f
Initial effective stress , psf PFinal effective stress P p
, pcf ft
psf P
1093
1093 125 2843
Since effective stress is decreasing, use CrAssuming Cr = 0.10
10 10 84353 53 10930 016 0 2
r fult
oo
C PH H log( )Pe. ( ft) log( ).. ft . in rebound
Let’s now assume that 4 more feet of new fill is placed, bringing the total thicknessOf new fill to 6 ft.
843
1 093
843 4 1251343
'i
'o f
Initial effective stress psf P
Precondolidationpressure , psf
Final effective stress P p Ppsff t pcfpsf
Then
1 1
0 10 1093 1 06 13435 53 53 843 3 53 10930 016 0 134
0 1501 8
cr p fult
o po o
oc nc
CC P PH H log H logP Pe e
. .log log
. .. ft . ftH H. ft. in
Time Rate of Primary Consolidation
Rate controlled by coefficient of consolidation, CvHigh Cv rapid consolidationLow Cv slow consolidation
Degree of consolidation Fraction of ultimate settlement which has occurred by time t
t ultU( t) H / H
2 v Vt T ( t )z /C
Fraction of ultimate settlement which has occurred by time t
Time required to reach given degree of consolidationDimensionless time factor
Settlement at given time t
2
t ult
v
v v
U(t) H / Hwhere U(t) f(T (t))
T (t) c t / z
Where Tv(t) and U(t) are related by Eq 40.23 and Table 40.1
5090100 .2 .85 Tv
0%
U
Length of longest drainage path
Degree of Consolidationcurves
Example 6
If Cv for the soft clay of Example 5 was 10ft2/yr, how long would it take for 2 in of settlement to occur?
2 2
2 2
2
2 100 424 8
40 23
0 42 0 144 4
40 20
0 14 2 5 0 088 110
v
v
v
inU x % %. in
From Eq. . (or from a U vs. T chart)
T U ( . ) .
From Eq. .
T z ( . )( . ft)t . yr mo.C ft / yr
What if the soft clay was underlain by impermeable bedrock? Then z= 5 ft
2
2
0 14 5 0 35 4 210
( . )( ft)t . yr . months
ft / yr
Double drainage
Single drainage