pearson btec level 2 award in food safety for logistics (qcf)...the pearson btec level 2 award in...
TRANSCRIPT
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF)
Specification
Pearson BTEC Specialist qualification First teaching August 2014
Pearson Education Limited is one of the UK’s largest awarding organisations, offering academic and vocational qualifications and testing to schools, colleges, employers and other places of learning, both in the UK and internationally. Qualifications offered include GCSE, AS and A Level, NVQ and our BTEC suite of vocational qualifications, ranging from Entry Level to BTEC Higher National Diplomas. Pearson Education Limited administers BTEC qualifications.
Through initiatives such as onscreen marking and administration, Pearson is leading the way in using technology to modernise educational assessment, and to support teachers and learners.
References to third party material made in this specification are made in good faith. Pearson does not endorse, approve or accept responsibility for the content of materials, which may be subject to change, or any opinions expressed therein. (Material may include textbooks, journals, magazines and other publications and websites.)
All information in this specification is correct at time of publication.
Authorised by Martin Stretton Prepared by Laura Moran
ISBN 978 1 446 91029 0
All the material in this publication is copyright © Pearson Education Limited 2014
Contents
Purpose of this specification 1
1 Introducing Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications 3
What are Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications? 3
2 Qualification summary and key information 4
QCF qualification number and qualification title 5
Objective of the qualification 5
Relationship with previous qualifications 5
Progression opportunities 5
Industry support and recognition 5
Relationship with National Occupational Standards 5
3 Qualification structure 6
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) 6
4 Assessment 7
5 Recognising prior learning and achievement 8
Recognition of Prior Learning 8
Credit transfer 8
6 Centre resource requirements 9
7 Centre recognition and approval centre recognition 10
Approvals agreement 10
8 Quality assurance of centres 11
9 Programme delivery 12
10 Access and recruitment 13
11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs 14
12 Units 15
Unit title 15
Unit reference number 15
QCF level 15
Credit value 15
Guided learning hours 15
Unit aim 15
Essential resources 15
Learning outcomes 15
Assessment criteria 16
Unit amplification 16
Information for tutors 16
Unit 1: Principles of food safety in logistics 17
Information for tutors 28
13 Further information and useful publications 30
14 Professional development and training 31
Annexe A 32
Mapping with National Occupational Standards 32
Purpose of this specification
The purpose of a specification as defined by Ofqual is to set out:
the qualification’s objective
any other qualification that a learner must have completed before taking the qualification
any prior knowledge, skills or understanding that the learner is required to have before taking the qualification
units that a learner must have completed before the qualification will be awarded and any optional routes
any other requirements that a learner must have satisfied before they will be assessed or before the qualification will be awarded
the knowledge, skills and understanding that will be assessed as part of the qualification (giving a clear indication of their coverage and depth)
the method of any assessment and any associated requirements relating to it
the criteria against which the learner’s level of attainment will be measured (such as assessment criteria)
any specimen materials
any specified levels of attainment.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
1
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
2
1 Introducing Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications
For more than 25 years, Pearson BTECs have earned their reputation as well-established, enduringly effective qualifications. They have a proven track record of improving motivation and achievement. Pearson BTECs also provide progression routes to the next stage of education or to employment.
What are Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications?
Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications are qualifications from Entry to Level 3 on the Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF). They are work-related qualifications and are available in a range of sectors. They give learners the knowledge, understanding and skills they need to prepare for employment. They also provide career development opportunities for those already in work. These qualifications may be full-time or part-time courses in schools or colleges. Training centres and employers may also offer these qualifications.
Some Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications are knowledge components in Apprenticeship Frameworks, i.e. Technical Certificates.
There are three sizes of Pearson BTEC Specialist qualification in the QCF:
Award (1 to 12 credits)
Certificate (13 to 36 credits)
Diploma (37 credits and above).
Every unit and qualification in the QCF has a credit value.
The credit value of a unit specifies the number of credits that will be awarded to a learner who has achieved the learning outcomes of the unit.
The credit value of a unit is based on:
one credit for every 10 hours of learning time
learning time – defined as the time taken by learners at the level of the unit, on average, to complete the learning outcomes to the standard determined by the assessment criteria.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
3
2 Qualification summary and key information
Qualification title Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF)
QCF Qualification Number (QN) 601/1130/6
Qualification framework Qualifications and Credit Framework (QCF)
Regulation start date 29/08/2013
Operational start date 01/08/2014
Approved age ranges 14-16
16-18
19+
Credit value 1
Assessment Pearson-devised assessment (onscreen testing)
Guided learning hours 9
Grading information The qualification and unit are at pass grade.
Entry requirements No prior knowledge, understanding, skills or qualifications are required before learners register for this qualification. However, centres must follow the Pearson Access and Recruitment policy (see Section 10 Access and recruitment)
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
4
QCF qualification number and qualification title
Centres will need to use the QCF Qualification Number (QN) when they seek public funding for their learners. As well as a QN, each unit within a qualification has a QCF unit reference number (URN).
The qualification title, unit titles and QN will appear on each learner’s final certificate. You should tell your learners this when your centre recruits them and registers them with us. There is more information about certification in the Edexcel Information Manual, available on our website: www.edexcel.com
Objective of the qualification
The Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) is for learners who work in, or want to work in, food handling within the logistics industry.
It gives learners the opportunity to:
develop knowledge related to personal responsibilities with regards to food safety and of how to use delivery vehicles appropriately and how to keep the vehicle at the required hygiene standard
learn about the requirements of legislation placed upon the food handler in the logistics industry
achieve a nationally-recognised Level 2 qualification
develop their own personal growth and engagement in learning.
Relationship with previous qualifications
This qualification is a direct replacement for the EDI Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF).
Progression opportunities
Learners who have achieved the Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) can progress to relevant level 3 qualifications and job roles within the sector.
Industry support and recognition
This qualification is supported by Skills for Logistics, the SSC for the UK’s freight logistics industries.
Relationship with National Occupational Standards
This qualification relates to the National Occupational Standards in Food Safety. The mapping document in Annexe A shows the links between the units within this qualification and the National Occupational Standards.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
5
3 Qualification structure
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF)
The learner will need to meet the requirements outlined in the table below before Pearson can award the qualification.
Minimum number of credits that must be achieved 1
Unit Unit reference number
Mandatory units Level Credit Guided learning hours
1 H/600/6578 Principles of food safety in logistics 2 1 9
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
6
4 Assessment
The table below gives a summary of the assessment methods used in the qualification.
Units Assessment method
All units Pearson-devised assessment: onscreen test
Pearson-devised assessment (external assessment)
To pass an externally assessed unit, learners must pass an onscreen test. Pearson sets and marks the test. The test writer will use the Unit amplification section as a guide when writing questions for the external assessments.
Further information, including details of test duration and question types is available on the webpage for this qualification.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
7
5 Recognising prior learning and achievement
Recognition of Prior Learning
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) is a method of assessment (leading to the award of credit) that considers whether a learner can demonstrate that they can meet the assessment requirements for a unit through knowledge, understanding or skills they already possess and so do not need to develop through a course of learning.
Pearson encourages centres to recognise learners’ previous achievements and experiences in and outside the workplace, as well as in the classroom. RPL provides a route for the recognition of the achievements resulting from continuous learning.
RPL enables recognition of achievement from a range of activities using any valid assessment methodology. If the assessment requirements of a given unit or qualification have been met, the use of RPL is acceptable for accrediting a unit, units or a whole qualification. Evidence of learning must be sufficient, reliable and valid.
Further guidance is available in the policy document Recognition of Prior Learning Policy and Process, which is on our website, www.edexcel.com.
Credit transfer
Credit transfer describes the process of using a credit or credits awarded in the context of a different qualification or awarded by a different awarding organisation towards the achievement requirements of another qualification. All awarding organisations recognise the credits awarded by all other awarding organisations that operate within the QCF.
If learners achieve credits with other awarding organisations, they do not need to retake any assessment for the same units. The centre must keep evidence of credit achievement.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
8
6 Centre resource requirements
As part of the approval process, centres must make sure that the resources requirements below are in place before offering the qualification.
Centres must have appropriate physical resources (for example, equipment, IT, learning materials, teaching rooms) to support the delivery and assessment of the qualification.
Staff involved in the assessment process must have relevant expertise and occupational experience.
There must be systems in place to ensure continuing professional development for staff delivering the qualification.
Centres must have appropriate health and safety policies in place relating to the use of equipment by learners.
Centres must deliver the qualifications in accordance with current equality legislation. For further details on Pearson’s commitment to the Equality Act 2010, please see Section 10 Access and recruitment and Section 11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs. For full details on the Equality Act 2010, please go to the Home Office website, www.gov.uk/government/organisations/home-office
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
9
7 Centre recognition and approval centre recognition
Centres that have not previously offered Pearson qualifications need to apply for, and be granted, centre recognition as part of the process for approval to offer individual qualifications.
Existing centres will be given ‘automatic approval’ for a new qualification if they are already approved for a qualification that is being replaced by a new qualification and the conditions for automatic approval are met.
Guidance on seeking approval to deliver Pearson BTEC qualifications is available at www.edexcel.com.
Approvals agreement
All centres are required to enter into an approval agreement that is a formal commitment by the head or principal of a centre to meet all the requirements of the specification and any associated codes, Conditions or regulations. Pearson will act to protect the integrity of the awarding of qualifications. If centres do not comply with the agreement, this could result in the suspension of certification or withdrawal of approval.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
10
8 Quality assurance of centres
Quality assurance is at the heart of vocational qualifications. The centre assesses Pearson BTEC qualifications. The centre will use quality assurance to make sure that their managers, internal verifiers and assessors are standardised and supported. Pearson use quality assurance to check that all centres are working to national standards. It gives us the opportunity to identify and provide support, if needed, to safeguard certification. It also allows us to recognise and support good practice.
For the qualifications in this specification, the Pearson quality assurance model will follow one of the processes listed below.
1 Delivery of the qualification as part of a BTEC apprenticeship (‘single click’ registration):
an annual visit by a Standards Verifier to review centre-wide quality assurance systems and sampling of internal verification and assessor decisions
2 Delivery of the qualification outside the apprenticeship:
an annual visit to the centre by a Centre Quality Reviewer to review centre-wide quality assurance systems
Lead Internal Verifier accreditation. This involves online training and standardisation of Lead Internal Verifiers using our OSCA platform, accessed via Edexcel Online. Please note that not all qualifications will include Lead Internal Verifier accreditation. Where this is the case, we will annually allocate annually a Standards Verifier to conduct postal sampling of internal verification and assessor decisions for the Principal Subject Area.
For further details, go to the UK BTEC Quality Assurance Handbook on our website.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
11
9 Programme delivery
Centres are free to offer the qualifications using any mode of delivery (for example full time, part time, evening only, distance learning) that meets their learners’ needs. Whichever mode of delivery is used, centres must make sure that learners have access to the resources identified in the specification and to the subject specialists delivering the units.
Those planning the programme should aim to enhance the vocational nature of the qualification by:
liaising with employers to make sure a course is relevant to learners’ specific needs
accessing and using non-confidential data and documents from learners’ workplaces
developing up-to-date and relevant teaching materials that make use of scenarios that are relevant to the sector
giving learners the opportunity to apply their learning in practical activities
including sponsoring employers in the delivery of the programme and, where appropriate, in the assessment
making full use of the variety of experience of work and life that learners bring to the programme.
Where a unit is externally assessed, it is essential that learners have covered all of the Unit amplification before they are tested.
Centres must make sure that any legislation taught is up to date.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
12
10 Access and recruitment
Pearson’s policy regarding access to our qualifications is that:
they should be available to everyone who is capable of reaching the required standards
they should be free from any barriers that restrict access and progression
there should be equal opportunities for all those wishing to access the qualifications.
Centres are required to recruit learners to Pearson BTEC Specialist qualifications with integrity.
Applicants will need relevant information and advice about the qualification to make sure it meets their needs.
Centres should review the applicant’s prior qualifications and/or experience, considering whether this profile shows that they have the potential to achieve the qualification.
For learners with disabilities and specific needs, this review will need to take account of the support available to the learner during teaching and assessment of the qualification. The review must take account of the information and guidance in Section 11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs.
Learners may be aged between 14 and 16 and therefore potentially vulnerable. Where learners are required to spend time and be assessed in work settings, it is the centre’s responsibility to ensure that the work environment they go into is safe.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
13
11 Access to qualifications for learners with disabilities or specific needs
Equality and fairness are central to our work. Pearson’s Equality Policy requires all learners to have equal opportunity to access our qualifications and assessments. It also requires our qualifications to be awarded in a way that is fair to every learner.
We are committed to making sure that:
learners with a protected characteristic (as defined by the Equality Act 2010) are not, when they are undertaking one of our qualifications, disadvantaged in comparison to learners who do not share that characteristic
all learners achieve the recognition they deserve from undertaking a qualification and that this achievement can be compared fairly to the achievement of their peers.
Learners taking a qualification may be assessed in British sign language or Irish sign language where it is permitted for the purpose of reasonable adjustments.
Further information regarding Access Arrangements can be found in the Joint Council for Qualifications (JCQ) document Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and Special Consideration for General and Vocational qualifications. Further details on how to make adjustments for learners with protected characteristics are given in the Supplementary Guidance for Reasonable Adjustment and Special Consideration in Vocational Internally Assessed Units.
These documents are available on our website, at www.edexcel.com/Policies
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
14
12 Units
Units have the following sections.
Unit title
The unit title is on the QCF and this form of words will appear on the learner’s Notification of Performance (NOP).
Unit reference number
Each unit is assigned a unit reference number that appears with the unit title on the Register of Regulated Qualifications.
QCF level
All units and qualifications within the QCF have a level assigned to them. There are nine levels of achievement, from Entry to Level 8. The QCF Level Descriptors inform the allocation of the level.
Credit value
When a learner achieves a unit, they gain the specified number of credits.
Guided learning hours
Guided learning hours are the times when a tutor, trainer or facilitator is present to give specific guidance towards the learning aim for a programme. This definition covers lectures, tutorials and supervised study in, for example, open learning centres and learning workshops. It also includes assessment by staff where learners are present. It does not include time spent by staff marking assignments or homework where the learner is not present.
Unit aim
This gives a summary of what the unit aims to do.
Essential resources
This section lists any specialist resources needed to deliver the unit. The centre will be asked to make sure that these resources are in place when it seeks approval from Pearson to offer the qualification.
Learning outcomes
The learning outcomes of a unit set out what a learner knows, understands or is able to do as the result of a process of learning.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
15
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteria specify the standard required by the learner to achieve each learning outcome.
Unit amplification
This section clarifies what a learner needs to know to achieve a learning outcome.
Information for tutors
This section gives tutors information on delivery and assessment. It contains the following subsections.
Delivery – explains the content’s relationship to the learning outcomes and offers guidance on possible approaches to delivery.
Assessment – gives information about the evidence that learners must produce, together with any additional guidance if appropriate. This section should be read in conjunction with the assessment criteria.
Indicative resource materials – lists resource materials that can be used to support the teaching of the unit, for example books, journals and websites.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
16
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
17
Unit 1: Principles of food safety in logistics
Unit reference number: H/600/6578
QCF level: 2
Credit value: 1
Guided learning hours: 9
Unit aim
The Principles of Food Safety in Logistics is designed for those working in the logistics industry, the qualification gives an overall knowledge of food safety and the requirements of legislation placed upon the food handler.
The learner will, on completion of the unit, know and understand their personal responsibilities with regard to food safety; they will know the importance of personal hygiene and how to keep their personal hygiene to the required standard. The learner will have knowledge of how to keep the work area clean, and the equipment and materials required to keep the area at the appropriate standard.
The learner will have an understanding of how to use delivery vehicles appropriately and how to keep the vehicle at the required hygiene standard, and will also be aware of the requirements for documentation to support current food hygiene legislation.
The learner will be able to identify the different types of contamination. They will understand the need and how to keep products safe from contamination, such as, chemical contamination, physical contamination, microbial contamination and potent allergens.
Essential resources
There are no special resources needed for this unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes,
ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a a
nd
un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
To p
ass
this
unit,
the
lear
ner
nee
ds
to d
emonst
rate
that
they
can
mee
t al
l th
e le
arnin
g o
utc
om
es f
or
the
unit.
The
asse
ssm
ent
criter
ia
det
erm
ine
the
stan
dar
d r
equired
to a
chie
ve t
he
unit.
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1
Under
stan
d h
ow
in
div
idual
s m
ust
ta
ke r
esponsi
bili
ty
for
food s
afet
y
1.1
O
utlin
e th
e ro
les
and
resp
onsi
bili
ties
in a
n
org
anis
atio
n’s
food s
afet
y pro
cedure
s
□
Know
ledge
of
Food S
tandar
ds
Act
1990 (
updat
ed in 2
006);
The
Gen
eral
Fo
od L
aw R
egula
tion 2
004 ;
Food H
ygie
ne
(Engla
nd)
Reg
ula
tions
2006
and t
he
activi
ties
it
cove
rs:
selli
ng a
nd p
oss
essi
ng w
ith a
vie
w t
o s
ale;
fr
ee s
upply
in t
he
cours
e of
a busi
nes
s; c
onsi
gnin
g a
nd d
eliv
erin
g;
pre
par
ing;
pre
senta
tion a
nd lab
ellin
g;
storing;
tran
sport
ing a
nd
import
ing a
nd e
xport
ing f
ood
□
Know
ledge
of
work
pla
ce F
ood S
afet
y M
anag
emen
t Sys
tem
s: S
afer
Food,
Bet
ter
Busi
nes
s, C
ook
Saf
e, R
etai
l Saf
e, S
afe
Cat
erin
g
□
Com
plia
nce
with w
ork
pla
ce f
ood s
afet
y polic
y an
d p
roce
dure
s ; r
isk
asse
ssm
ent;
saf
e fo
od h
andlin
g;
safe
sys
tem
s of
work
; use
of
PPE;
trai
nin
g;
bei
ng v
igila
nt
for
poss
ible
haz
ards;
allo
cating a
nd s
uper
visi
ng
food s
afet
y re
sponsi
bili
ties
; pro
cedure
s to
mee
t co
ntr
ol poin
ts;
monitoring a
nd r
eport
ing;
tem
per
ature
contr
ol;
cle
anin
g;
due
dili
gen
ce;
Haz
ard A
nal
ysis
and C
ritica
l Contr
ol Poin
ts (
HACCP)
□
Mai
nta
in s
tandar
ds
of
per
sonal
hyg
iene;
use
the
corr
ect
pro
tect
ive
cloth
ing;
emplo
y hyg
iene
stan
dar
ds
to m
ainta
in t
he
qual
ity
and c
onditio
n
of
food a
nd t
he
stora
ge
faci
litie
s; h
andle
food a
nd e
quip
men
t usi
ng t
he
corr
ect
met
hods;
dis
pose
of
was
te c
orr
ectly
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
18
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.2
D
escr
ibe
how
to r
eport
and
reco
rd f
ood s
afet
y haz
ards
and illn
esse
s
□
Rep
ort
ing h
azar
ds:
Who t
o r
eport
to;
Inte
rnal
rep
ort
ing;
report
ing t
o
regula
tory
auth
orities
□
Rec
ord
ing h
azar
ds
use
of
corr
ect
pap
erw
ork
: hyg
iene
audit,
hyg
iene
audit a
ctio
n p
lan;
clea
nin
g s
ched
ule
; cu
stom
er c
om
pla
int
reco
rd;
del
iver
y re
cord
; tr
ainin
g r
ecord
; pes
t co
ntr
ol m
onitoring s
hee
t;
tim
elin
ess
□
Rep
ort
ing a
ccid
ents
usi
ng a
n a
ccid
ent
form
□
The
Rep
ort
ing o
f In
juries
, D
isea
ses
and D
anger
ous
Occ
urr
ence
s Reg
ula
tions
□
Rep
ort
inci
den
ts u
sing a
FSA inci
den
t re
port
form
; in
clude
det
ails
of
per
son r
eport
ing t
he
inci
den
t; d
etai
ls o
f th
e in
ciden
t; p
roduct
s af
fect
ed
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
–
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
19
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
1.3
O
utlin
e th
e le
gal
re
sponsi
bili
ties
of
drive
rs
and w
areh
ouse
sta
ff w
ith
regar
d t
o k
eepin
g f
ood s
afe
□
Use
of
Pers
onal
Pro
tect
ive
Equip
men
t (P
PE):
ove
rall
to c
ove
r outd
oor
cloth
es;
cove
r fo
r hai
r; g
love
s w
her
e to
uch
ing f
ood;
safe
ty s
hoes
□
Mai
nta
inin
g p
erso
nal
hyg
iene
for
the
safe
han
dlin
g o
f fo
od w
ash h
ands
regula
rly;
wea
r cl
ean w
ater
pro
of
dre
ssin
gs;
wea
r cl
ean,
and w
her
e ap
pro
priat
e, p
rote
ctiv
e cl
oth
ing;
keep
fin
ger
nai
ls s
hort
and c
lean
and
rem
ove
all
nai
l polis
h;
do n
ot
wea
r je
wel
lery
oth
er t
han
a p
lain
wed
din
g
ring;
do n
ot
wea
r st
rong s
mel
ling p
erfu
mes
or
afte
rshav
es
□
Under
taki
ng t
rain
ing;
induct
ion;
refr
esher
tra
inin
g;
cove
ring f
ood
hyg
iene
mat
ters
, th
e ap
plic
atio
n o
f H
ACCP p
rinci
ple
s: I
den
tify
the
pote
ntial
food h
azar
ds
in a
food b
usi
nes
s th
at m
ust
be
pre
vente
d,
elim
inat
ed o
r re
duce
d t
o a
ccep
table
lev
els.
A f
ood h
azar
d m
ay b
e:
Bio
logic
al,
Phys
ical
, or
Chem
ical
; Id
entify
the
critic
al c
ontr
ol poin
ts (
CCP)
at t
he
pro
cess
ste
p(s
) w
her
e co
ntr
ol is
critica
l to
ensu
re f
ood s
afet
y; b
y pre
venting,
elim
inat
ing o
r re
duci
ng t
he
haz
ard t
o a
n a
ccep
table
lev
el;
Est
ablis
h c
ritica
l lim
its;
tar
get
s se
t at
eac
h c
ritica
l co
ntr
ol poin
t w
hic
h
guar
ante
es t
o e
limin
ate
or
reduce
the
haz
ard t
o a
saf
e le
vel;
Est
ablis
h
and im
ple
men
t ef
fect
ive
monitoring p
roce
dure
s at
CCPs
; Est
ablis
h
corr
ective
act
ions
when
monitoring indic
ates
that
a C
CP
is n
ot
under
co
ntr
ol;
Est
ablis
h p
roce
dure
s to
ver
ify
that
the
mea
sure
s outlin
ed a
bove
ar
e w
ork
ing e
ffec
tive
ly;
Est
ablis
h d
ocu
men
ts a
nd r
ecord
s co
mm
ensu
rate
w
ith t
he
nat
ure
and s
ize
of
the
food b
usi
nes
s to
dem
onst
rate
the
effe
ctiv
e ap
plic
atio
n o
f th
e m
easu
res
outlin
ed a
bove
; ap
plie
s to
all
st
aff
that
han
dle
food;
usi
ng ‘N
atio
nal
Occ
upat
ional
Sta
ndar
ds’
(N
OS)
as
a g
uid
e
□
Car
ryin
g o
ut
tem
per
ature
contr
ol an
d c
hec
ks,
required
fre
quen
cy o
f te
stin
g m
ust
be
iden
tified
as
par
t of
HACCP
syst
em;
cold
tem
per
ature
m
onitoring a
t th
e st
art
of
the
work
ing d
ay a
nd a
t one
oth
er p
oin
t of
the
day
; se
ttin
g m
axim
um
hold
ing lim
its
for
hot
food;
must
kee
p a
ppro
priat
e re
cord
s
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
20
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
□
Rep
ort
ing illn
ess
and n
otify
ing o
f dis
ease
s; c
om
plia
nce
with t
he
Rep
ort
ing o
f In
juries
, D
isea
ses
and D
anger
ous
Occ
urr
ence
s Reg
ula
tions
(RID
DO
R)
□
Rep
ort
ing h
azar
ds:
Who t
o r
eport
to;
Inte
rnal
rep
ort
ing;
report
ing t
o
regula
tory
auth
orities
□
Res
ponsi
bili
ty t
o f
ollo
w p
roce
dure
s to
mai
nta
in h
ealth a
nd s
afet
y of
self
and o
ther
s
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
–
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
21
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
2.1
Exp
lain
the
import
ance
of
per
sonal
hyg
iene
in
contr
ibuting t
o o
vera
ll
food s
afet
y
□
Import
ance
of
per
sonal
hyg
iene:
food b
orn
e ill
nes
ses
are
oft
en c
ause
d
by
bac
teria
or
oth
er m
icro
org
anis
ms
spre
ad b
y peo
ple
who h
andle
food;
to p
reve
nt
conta
min
atio
n a
nd c
ross
-conta
min
atio
n;
risk
s to
cust
om
ers
and s
taff o
f fo
od p
ois
onin
g;
for
cert
ain g
roups,
sen
iors
, yo
ung c
hild
ren,
pre
gnan
t w
om
en,
and t
he
imm
une-
com
pro
mis
ed,
food b
orn
e ill
nes
ses
can b
e fa
tal;
bre
ach o
f le
gis
lation;
pro
secu
tion;
dam
age
to r
eputa
tion
□
How
lap
ses
in p
erso
nal
hyg
iene
can c
ause
conta
min
atio
n;
direc
tly
thro
ugh b
acte
ria
tran
sfer
red f
rom
the
body,
ski
n,
mouth
, han
ds
or
hai
r to
the
pro
duct
; in
direc
tly
via
per
sonal
equip
men
t; c
loth
ing,
footw
ear,
ute
nsi
ls a
nd o
ther
tools
use
d a
t w
ork
2
Under
stan
d h
ow
to
keep
him
/her
self
clea
n a
nd h
ygie
nic
2.2
D
escr
ibe
effe
ctiv
e per
sonal
hyg
iene
pra
ctic
es,
for
exam
ple
, pro
tect
ive
cloth
ing,
han
d w
ashin
g,
per
sonal
illn
esse
s, c
uts
and
wounds
and a
void
ing u
nsa
fe
beh
avio
ur
□
How
to m
ainta
in p
erso
nal
hyg
iene
in t
he
work
pla
ce;
wea
ring o
f Pe
rsonal
Pr
ote
ctiv
e Equip
men
t (P
PE):
ove
rall
to c
ove
r outd
oor
cloth
es;
cove
r fo
r hai
r; g
love
s w
her
e to
uch
ing f
ood;
safe
ty s
hoes
; w
ashin
g h
ands
corr
ectly
follo
win
g H
ealth P
rote
ctio
n A
gen
cy (
HPA
) han
d w
ashin
g t
echniq
ue;
1.
Pal
m t
o p
alm
2.
Rig
ht
pal
m o
ver
left
dors
um
and lef
t pal
m o
ver
right
dors
um
3.
Palm
to p
alm
fin
ger
s in
terlac
ed
4.
Bac
ks o
f finger
s to
opposi
ng p
alm
s w
ith f
inger
s in
terlock
ed
5.
Rota
tional
rubbin
g o
f right
thum
b c
lasp
ed in lef
t an
d v
ice
vers
a
6.
Rota
tional
rubbin
g,
bac
kwar
ds
and forw
ards
with c
lasp
ed f
inger
s of
right
han
d in lef
t pal
m a
nd v
ice
vers
a
□
Unsa
fe b
ehav
iour:
dirty
clo
thin
g;
not
wea
ring e
xces
sive
mak
e-up,
per
fum
e or
afte
rshav
e; r
eport
ing p
erso
nal
illn
esse
s; c
ove
ring c
uts
and
wounds;
com
ply
ing w
ith w
ork
pla
ce p
olic
y an
d p
roce
dure
s
□
Rep
ort
ing c
erta
in illn
esse
s
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
22
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
3.1
Exp
lain
how
to k
eep s
tora
ge
area
s an
d v
ehic
les
clea
n a
nd
tidy
thro
ugh t
he
effe
ctiv
e use
of
clea
nin
g m
ethods
an
d e
quip
men
t
□
Met
hods
of
clea
nin
g;
dis
infe
ctio
n;
sanitis
atio
n a
nd s
terilis
atio
n;
what
cl
eanin
g m
ater
ials
are
use
d f
or;
diffe
rence
bet
wee
n c
lean
ing a
nd
dis
infe
ctin
g
□
Proce
dure
s fo
r cl
eanin
g a
nd insp
ection o
f st
ora
ge
area
and v
ehic
les:
use
of
a cl
eanin
g s
ched
ule
; re
quirem
ent
to ‘cl
ean a
s yo
u g
o’;
sep
arat
ion
of
equip
men
t; c
olo
ur
codin
g o
f cl
eanin
g m
ater
ials
; fr
equen
cy;
regula
r in
spec
tion;
keep
ing c
lean
ing r
ecor
ds
and r
ecord
s of
insp
ection
□
Usi
ng c
hec
klis
ts t
o c
hec
k fo
r cl
eanlin
ess
□
Saf
e dis
posa
l of
any
food a
nd f
ood w
aste
□
Follo
win
g m
anufa
cture
r’s
inst
ruct
ions
and o
rgan
isat
ion p
roce
dure
s
3.2
Sta
te h
ow
to u
se a
nd s
tore
ch
emic
als
safe
ly t
o a
void
co
nta
min
atio
n
□
Follo
win
g m
anufa
cture
r’s
inst
ruct
ions
and o
rgan
isat
ion p
roce
dure
s
□
Sto
ring c
hem
ical
s se
par
ate
from
food a
nd f
ood a
reas
in a
lock
ed a
rea
□
Kee
pin
g in lab
elle
d c
onta
iner
s
□
Not
mix
ing c
lean
ing m
ater
ials
toget
her
□
Wea
ring p
rote
ctiv
e cl
oth
ing
□
Com
ply
with C
OSH
H r
egula
tions
and r
equirem
ents
3
Under
stan
d h
ow
to
keep
sto
rage
area
s an
d v
ehic
les
clea
n
3.3
O
utlin
e th
e im
port
ance
of
pes
t co
ntr
ol
□
Import
ance
of
pes
t co
ntr
ol;
contr
ol t
he
spre
ad o
f dis
ease
; pre
vent
dam
age
to p
roper
ty;
pre
vent
conta
min
atio
n o
f w
ork
surf
aces
and
foodst
uffs;
pre
vent
poor
public
opin
ion;
loss
of
reputa
tion;
pro
secu
tion
and c
losu
re;
poor
staf
f re
lations
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
–
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
23
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4
Under
stan
d h
ow
to
keep
food s
afe
4.1
Sta
te t
he
risk
s to
food a
nd
food p
acka
gin
g in t
ransi
t,
stora
ge
and a
t del
iver
y fr
om
m
icro
bia
l, c
hem
ical
, phys
ical
an
d a
llerg
enic
haz
ards
□
Mic
robio
logic
al h
azar
ds
from
cro
ss-c
onta
min
atio
n;
from
lea
king f
ood
pro
duct
s; f
rom
nea
rby
quar
antined
dam
aged
goods;
poor
stora
ge
and
tem
per
ature
contr
ol;
poor
hyg
iene
and w
ork
pra
ctic
es
□
Chem
ical
haz
ard f
rom
cro
ss-c
onta
min
atio
n;
from
cle
anin
g a
nd p
est
contr
ol ch
emic
als
leak
age;
poor
stora
ge;
poor
hyg
iene
and w
ork
pra
ctic
es
□
Phys
ical
haz
ards
from
cro
ss-c
onta
min
atio
n o
f fo
od;
from
dirt,
met
als,
pes
ts,
pac
kagin
g;
poor
stora
ge;
poor
hyg
iene
and w
ork
pra
ctic
es
□
Alle
rgen
ic h
azar
ds
from
cer
eals
conta
inin
g g
lute
n,
crust
acea
ns,
mollu
scs,
eg
gs,
fis
h,
pea
nuts
, nuts
, so
ybea
ns,
milk
, ce
lery
, m
ust
ard,
sesa
me,
lu
pin
and s
ulp
hur
dio
xide
at lev
els
above
10m
g/k
g,
or
10 m
g/l
itre
, ex
pre
ssed
as
SO
2.
from
cro
ss-c
onta
min
atio
n;
from
not
was
hin
g c
lean
ing
equip
men
t pro
per
ly;
poor
stora
ge;
poor
hyg
iene
and w
ork
pra
ctic
es
□
Ris
ks in t
ransi
t; c
arry
ing m
ixed
load
s th
at n
eed t
o b
e st
ore
d a
t diffe
rent
tem
per
ature
; co
nta
min
atio
n f
rom
rubbis
h a
nd w
aste
; poor
per
sonal
hyg
iene;
dam
aged
pac
kagin
g;
from
tim
e ta
ken t
o t
ransp
ort
food
□
Ris
ks d
uring s
tora
ge;
cro
ss-c
onta
min
atio
n f
rom
sto
ring r
aw w
ith c
ooke
d;
lack
of
stock
contr
ol pro
cedure
s; k
eepin
g o
ut-
of-
dat
e pro
duct
s;
inad
equat
e st
ora
ge
faci
litie
s
□
Ris
k at
del
iver
y; e
xcee
din
g m
axim
um
out
of
refr
iger
atio
n t
ime;
exp
ose
d
to m
icro
bio
logic
al,
chem
ical
or
phys
ical
haz
ards;
poor
per
sonal
hyg
iene
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
24
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.2
D
escr
ibe
food s
afet
y pro
cedure
s fo
r del
iver
y,
stora
ge,
dat
e m
arki
ng
and s
tock
rota
tion
□
Org
anis
atio
n p
roce
dure
s in
pla
ce t
o en
sure
com
plia
nce
with leg
isla
tion
□
Del
iver
y: inco
min
g f
ood s
hould
not
be
acce
pte
d if
its
pac
kagin
g is
seriousl
y dam
aged
; in
com
ing f
ood m
ust
not
be
acce
pte
d if
its
‘use
by’
dat
e has
exp
ired
; co
nsi
der
rej
ecting s
tock
bey
ond its
‘bes
t bef
ore
’ dat
e;
Chec
king o
f del
iver
ies
for
infe
stat
ion,
dam
age,
tem
per
ature
, sp
oila
ge
□
Sto
rage
and d
ate
mar
king:
dried
food s
hould
be
store
d in lar
ge
wat
erpro
of
conta
iner
s an
d s
hould
not
be
topped
up;
keep
food t
hat
can
ca
use
alle
rgic
rea
ctio
n s
epar
ate
from
oth
er f
oods;
sep
arat
ing r
aw a
nd
cooke
d f
oods
□
Sto
ck r
ota
tion:
rota
ted o
n a
first
-in-f
irst
-out
bas
is a
nd d
amag
ed s
tock
re
move
d f
rom
the
mai
n s
tora
ge
area
□
Follo
win
g leg
al p
roce
dure
s fo
r m
ainta
inin
g c
orr
ect
tem
per
ature
s;
iden
tify
ing d
ate
mar
kings
and d
ealin
g w
ith s
hort
dat
ed s
tock
; hig
h-r
isk
food a
t 5 °
C o
r bel
ow
and a
bove
60 °
C
4.3
Exp
lain
the
import
ance
of
food a
nd e
nvi
ronm
enta
l te
mper
ature
contr
ols
□
Import
ance
of
tem
per
ature
contr
ol;
ensu
res
that
food is
bei
ng k
ept
at
the
corr
ect
tem
per
ature
to p
reve
nt
dam
age,
det
erio
ration o
r co
nta
min
atio
n;
min
imis
e th
e risk
of
bac
terial
gro
wth
; pre
vent
det
erio
ration o
f fo
od;
com
plia
nce
with leg
isla
tion;
min
imis
e risk
of
food
pois
onin
g o
r fo
od b
orn
e dis
ease
; pre
vents
was
tage
and t
he
monet
ary
cost
of
was
tage
4.4
Sta
te w
hy
accu
rate
rec
ord
s sh
ould
be
kept
of
food t
hat
is
del
iver
ed o
r re
turn
ed
□
Exa
mple
s of
reco
rds;
tem
per
ature
logs;
form
ula
tion s
hee
ts;
equip
men
t m
ainte
nan
ce c
hec
klis
ts;
pes
t co
ntr
ol re
cord
s; H
ACCP
□
Due
dili
gen
ce;
to d
eter
min
e w
het
her
the
food o
per
atio
n c
onfo
rms
to
legal
req
uirem
ents
□
Acc
ura
te r
ecord
s as
sist
org
anis
atio
ns
in v
erifyi
ng t
hat
contr
ols
are
in
pla
ce a
nd a
re b
eing m
ainta
ined
□
Import
ance
of
accu
racy
, tr
acea
bili
ty,
stock
rec
ord
s to
show
due
dili
gen
ce
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
–
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
25
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.5
Sta
te t
he
reas
ons
why
food
may
be
retu
rned
□
Fo
od n
ot
del
iver
ed in a
suitab
le v
ehic
le
□
Pack
agin
g d
amag
ed o
r uncl
ean
□
Evi
den
ce o
f pes
t in
fest
atio
n
□
Food h
as v
isib
le d
efec
ts
□
Food is
not
at t
he
corr
ect
tem
per
ature
□
Inco
rrec
t la
bel
ling
□
Food is
out
of
dat
e
4.6
Sta
te t
he
contr
ols
to n
eeded
to
mai
nta
in f
ood s
afet
y in
th
e ev
ent
of
contr
ols
not
bei
ng m
et
□
Iden
tify
ing u
nsa
fe o
r unsa
lable
food
□
Tak
ing c
orr
ective
act
ion incl
udin
g s
pec
ify
the
action t
o b
e ta
ken,
the
per
son r
esponsi
ble
for
taki
ng t
he
action a
nd w
ho s
hould
be
notified
□
Rec
ord
ing a
nd r
eport
ing t
he
inci
den
t
□
Ensu
re H
azar
d A
nal
ysis
and C
ritica
l Contr
ol Po
ints
(H
ACCP)
is
put
in
pla
ce
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
26
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
–
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
27
Learn
ing
ou
tco
mes
Ass
ess
men
t cr
iteri
a
Un
it a
mp
lifi
cati
on
4.7
Sta
te t
he
corr
ective
ac
tions
that
are
req
uired
to
red
uce
the
risk
of
food
conta
min
atio
n w
hen
contr
ols
ar
e not
met
□
Dea
l pro
mptly
with s
ituat
ions
wher
e in
dic
ators
of
pote
ntial
food s
afet
y haz
ards
occ
ur
□
Rep
ort
pote
ntial
ris
k pro
mptly
□
Com
ple
te a
haz
ard a
nal
ysis
□
Iden
tify
pre
ventive
mea
sure
s co
ntr
ols
□
Tak
e ap
pro
priat
e co
rrec
tive
act
ion f
or
the
food a
t risk
: dis
posa
l; r
eturn
to
supplie
r; f
urt
her
cooki
ng o
r re
hea
ting a
pro
duct
if
it is
safe
to d
o s
o;
isola
ting a
nd h
old
ing p
roduct
for
safe
ty e
valu
atio
n
□
Tak
e ap
pro
priat
e co
rrec
tive
act
ion t
o pre
vent
the
inci
den
t re
occ
urr
ing:
revi
ew s
upplie
r; r
evie
w s
taff t
rain
ing;
det
erm
ine
and c
orr
ect
the
cause
of
non-c
om
plia
nce
□
Food c
onta
min
atio
n r
isks
: cr
oss
-con
tam
inat
ion;
dam
aged
pac
kagin
g;
exposu
re t
o b
acte
ria,
chem
ical
s an
d h
eat;
unsa
fe s
urf
aces
; poor
per
sonal
hyg
iene;
poor
pra
ctic
e in
sto
ring f
ood;
lack
of
monitoring;
non-c
om
plia
nce
with w
ork
pla
ce p
olic
y an
d p
roce
dure
s
Information for tutors
Delivery
Learning outcome 1
Where possible the delivery of this outcome should take into account the learner’s own workplace and their responsibilities regarding food safety. They should be encouraged to draw on their own experiences and to identify the different aspects of their job that are related to food safety. It is important in the early stages of delivery that the learner is made aware of main food safety risks and the means of controlling them.
Learners should review the reporting and recording procedures and documentation in their own workplace and examine, through research on the internet, the exact nature of information that needs to be reported and recorded and the reasons for doing so.
Learners should be encouraged to investigate current legislation and industry standards on the internet and to identify any areas of practice which they could improve. The use of case study identifying lapses in food safety and the consequence of these lapses might be an effective way to drive home the importance of complying with legislation.
Learning outcome 2
For learning outcome 2 learners should review the personal hygiene guidance of their own place of work, considering their own compliance with it, its thoroughness and how effectively it is communicated and monitored at the present time. They should be able to explain how the guidance contributes to overall food safety and, if appropriate, make suggestions for improvement.
They could design a checklist to identify effective personal hygiene practices. The use of case study would be useful in confirming the importance of effective personal hygiene practices.
Learning outcome 3
Learners should explain how they keep their own storage areas and vehicles clean and tidy through the effective use of cleaning methods and equipment. They could design a checklist which could be used to audit their own performance. They should compare their own workplace policies and procedures with industry standards, allowing them to assess compliance and effectiveness and to make recommendations for improvement.
With regard to the use and storage of chemicals learners could revisit their COSHH training and review its effectiveness. They should be made aware of the different types of contamination and they should be able to explain how it can be avoided. They could design a chart or poster outlining how contamination can be avoided.
Learners should investigate the different kinds of pests and the risks they present. They could review their own organisation’s practice in preventing pests and dealing with infestation and compare these to industry standards. A visit from a Pest Control organisation might be useful in emphasising the importance of pest control.
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
28
Learning outcome 4
Learners should investigate the risks to food and food packaging in transit, storage and at delivery in their own workplace. They could review the risk assessment for this area of work. They should be made aware of the different types of risk from microbial, chemical, physical and allergenic hazards. They could produce a table outlining types of risks and how they should be prevented.
They could review their organisation’s procedures for the delivery, storage, date marking and stock rotation of food against industry standards. They should be confident that they comply with these procedures.
Learners should investigate the risks around transporting, delivering and storing foods at an incorrect temperature. They should audit their own compliance within this area of work and make suggestions for improvement if needed.
They should be given access to delivery and returned food records and the information on these records should be discussed to confirm their understanding of the importance of accuracy. Learners should be given the opportunity to accept deliveries if this is not already part of their job role, comparing the food being delivered to food specifications.
Learners could investigate lapses in food safety on the internet and in their own workplace, giving them an opportunity to identify the controls needed to maintain food safety in the event of controls not being met and to explain the corrective actions that are required to reduce the risk of food contamination when controls are not met.
The types of food being delivered and stored vary considerably therefore it would be useful for candidates to gain some insight into the different type of food safety operations other than their own.
Assessment
The assessment for this qualification is through externally set and externally marked multiple-choice tests.
Each unit will be tested independently through a Multiple Choice Paper containing 20 questions. Learners should attempt all of the questions. The multiple-choice test is graded as Pass or Fail.
The time allowance for each test is 40 minutes
The best preparation for learners taking the tests is to ensure that all of the elements in the Specification and the related learning outcomes have been covered in your teaching and training programme. In this way learners will be appropriately prepared for the test and will have covered all of the underpinning knowledge and understanding that will be needed for progression into employment or to other qualifications.
Suggested resources
Websites
www.food.gov.uk This is the official government website for the Food Standards Agency, with food and food-related issues including food safety and hygiene. It is packed full of information and is always up to date.
www.foodlogistics.com Warehousing and transportation solutions for the food and beverage supply chain
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
29
13 Further information and useful publications
To get in touch with us visit our ‘Contact us’ pages:
Pearson Edexcel: www.edexcel.com/contactus
Pearson BTEC: www.btec.co.uk/contactus
Pearson Work Based Learning: www.pearsonwbl.com/contactus
Books, software and online resources for UK schools and colleges: www.pearsonschools.co.uk/contactus
Other sources of information and publications available include:
Pearson Equality Policy
Edexcel Information Manual (updated annually)
Access Arrangements, Reasonable Adjustments and Special Consideration for General and Vocational qualifications
Supplementary Guidance for Reasonable Adjustment and Special Consideration in Vocational Internally Assessed Units
Recognition of Prior Learning Policy and Process
Quality Assurance Handbook (updated annually)
Publications on the quality assurance of Pearson BTEC qualifications are available on our website.
Our publications catalogue lists all the material available to support our qualifications. To access the catalogue and order publications, please go to www.edexcel.com/resources/Pages/home.aspx
Additional resources
If you need further learning and teaching materials to support planning and delivery for your learners, there is a wide range of BTEC resources available.
Any publisher can seek endorsement for their resources, and, if they are successful, we will list their BTEC resources on our website at: www.edexcel.com/resources
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
30
Pearson BTEC Level 2 Award in Food Safety for Logistics (QCF) – Specification – January 2014 © Pearson Education Limited 2014
31
14 Professional development and training
Pearson supports UK and international customers with training related to Pearson BTEC qualifications. This support is available through a choice of training options offered in our published training directory, or through customised training at your centre.
The support we offer focuses on a range of issues, including:
planning for the delivery of a new programme
planning for assessment and grading
developing effective assignments
building your team and teamwork skills
developing learner-centred learning and teaching approaches
building functional skills into your programme
building in effective and efficient quality assurance systems.
The national programme of training we offer is on our website at: www.edexcel.com/training. You can request customised training through the website or you can contact one of our advisors in the Training from Edexcel team via Customer Services to discuss your training needs.
BTEC training and support for the lifetime of the qualifications
Training and networks: our training programme ranges from free introductory events through sector-specific opportunities to detailed training on all aspects of delivery, assignments and assessment. We have designed our new network events programme to allow you to share your experiences, ideas and best practice with other BTEC colleagues in your region. Sign up to the training you need at: www.btec.co.uk/training
Regional support: our team of Curriculum Development Managers and Curriculum Support Consultants, based around the country, are responsible for providing advice and support in centres. They can help you with planning and curriculum developments. If you would like your Curriculum Development Manager to contact you, please get in touch with your regional office on: 0844 463 2535.
Your Pearson BTEC support team
Whether you want to talk to a sector specialist, browse online or submit your query for an individual response, there’s someone in our Pearson BTEC support team to help you whenever – and however – you need:
Subject Advisors: find out more about our subject advisor team - immediate, reliable support from a fellow subject expert via the 'contact us' page of the website.
Ask Edexcel: submit your question online to our Ask Edexcel online service www.edexcel.com/ask and we will make sure your query is handled by a subject specialist.
An
nexe A
Map
pin
g w
ith
Nati
on
al O
ccu
pati
on
al S
tan
dard
s
The
grid b
elow
map
s th
e kn
ow
ledge
cove
red in t
he
Pea
rson B
TEC L
evel
2 S
pec
ialis
t qual
ific
atio
n in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
agai
nst
the
under
pin
nin
g k
now
ledge
of
the
Nat
ional
Occ
upat
ional
Sta
ndar
ds
in F
ood S
afet
y. C
entr
es c
an u
se t
his
map
pin
g w
hen
pla
nnin
g h
olis
tic
del
iver
y an
d a
sses
smen
t ac
tivi
ties
.
KEY
#
indic
ates
par
tial
cove
rage
of
know
ledge
in t
he
NO
S u
nit
A b
lank
spac
e in
dic
ates
no c
ove
rage
of
the
know
ledge
Pears
on
BTEC
Sp
eci
ali
st u
nit
s
NO
S
Unit 1
SFL
FSLE
152
Mai
nta
in p
erso
nal
hyg
iene
for
food s
afet
y in
a
logis
tics
envi
ronm
ent
#
SFL
FSLE
154
Mai
nta
in f
ood s
afet
y during t
ransp
ort
#
SFL
FSLE
158
Cle
an v
ehic
le inte
rior
to m
ainta
in f
ood s
afet
y #
SFL
FSLE
159
Mai
nta
in f
ood s
afet
y during d
eliv
ery
#
SFL
FSLE
155
Apply
and m
onitor
food s
afet
y m
anag
emen
t pro
cedure
s #
SFL
FSLE
157
Mai
nta
in f
ood s
afet
y st
ora
ge
during load
ing
and u
nlo
adin
g
#
SEB270114 G
:\W
ORD
PRO
C\L
T\P
D\S
PECIA
LIST Q
UALS
\9781446910290_BTEC_SPL
T_L2
_FS
L\9781446910290_BTEC_SPL
T_L2
_FS
L.D
OC.1
–37/0
Pear
son B
TEC L
evel
2 A
war
d in F
ood S
afet
y fo
r Lo
gis
tics
(Q
CF)
Spec
ific
atio
n –
Jan
uar
y 2014 ©
Pea
rson E
duca
tion L
imited
2014
32
January 2014 For more information on Edexcel and BTEC qualifications please visit our website: www.edexcel.com BTEC is a registered trademark of Pearson Education Limited Pearson Education Limited. Registered in England and Wales No. 872828 Registered Office: Edinburgh Gate, Harlow, Essex CM20 2JE. VAT Reg No GB 278 537121