pediatric electron intraoperative radiotherapy: resultsand ... · 4. 18p total resection 6p (26%)...
TRANSCRIPT
Pediatric electron intraoperative radiotherapy:results and innovations
Felipe A. CalvoESTRO
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon Madrid, Spain
2017
IOeRT in pediatric cancer: results and innovations
• The context: pediatric radiotherapy
• The fundaments: IORT electrons
• The data: clinical experiences
• Innovative developments
Cancer cure: pediatric oncology patients… unexpected biology
3
4
Extreme Survivors: the real story of long term follow up…
Cancer Survivors: the evidence!
10.397 cancer survivors3.034 siblingsLeukemia/Lymphoma 46%CNS 12%Sarcoma 30%Willms/Neuroblastoma 4%
Cancer survivors: the evidence…
TOXICITY ‐ HYPOFRACTIONATION
AGE ‐ FIXATION FOR INMOVILITATION
ORGANIZATIONAL CONSTRAINTS ‐ ANAESTHESIA
MULTIDISCIPLINAR PROTOCOLS ARE “RIGID”
LOW INVOLVEMENT OF RADIATION ONCOLOGIST
LIMITS FOR RADIOTHERAPY IN CHILDREN
FACTORS MAY CONTRIBUTE TO DECREASE TOXICITY…
REDUCTION OF THE DOSE KEEPING VOLUME
DECREASE VOLUME KEEPING DOSE AND ADD CHEMOTHERAPY
REDUCTION OF THE DOSE AND VOLUME
DECREASE DOSE , VOLUME AND ADD CHEMOTHERAPY
ONLY CHEMOTHERAPY
IOeRT in pediatric cancer: results and innovations
• The context: pediatric radiotherapy
• The fundaments: IORT electrons
• The data: clinical experiences
• Innovative developments
Fundamentals: description
Vision guided RT
Fingers (tactile) guided RT
Surgical guided RT
“Sapientia et Doctrina”: 2016 IOERT recomendations
Cervix: marginal resectionRectal: T4 & recurrentPancreas: close/positive marginsSarcomas: extremity, trunk,H &N, retroperitonealEndometrial: recurrentAnal canal: recurrent
Breast: PBI with IOERT single dose
• Pubmed Data Review From 1997 to 2012• 858 IORT papers from 207 journals; 281 medical institutions from 32 countries.
IF vs topic / cancer site
1997 – 2013 IF evolution
IOeRT: dosimetric advantages and registration
> 150 dosimetric configurations available
Practica clínica en cáncer de páncreas IOeRT
IOeRT in pediatric cancer: results and innovations
• The context: pediatric radiotherapy
• The fundaments: IORT electrons
• The data: clinical experiences
• Innovative developments
HDR BRACHYTHERAPYMSKCC
ELECTRON IRRADIATIONMayo Clinic
Heidelberg UnivOhio State Univ
HGU Gregorio Marañon
PEDIATRIC CANCER AND INTRAOPERATIVE RADIOTHERAPY
Treatment Strategy: Dose–escalation vs Dose‐de‐escalation
IOERT boost + EBRT (+/‐ Hypofractionated)vsIOERT alone (exclusive RT component)
10 – 20 Gy + 50 Gy vs 15 – 25 Gy
2/1983 to 7/2003, 20 EBRT + IOERT paients locally advanced or recurrent malignancies of the extremity or abdominopelvic area.
All EBRT and received IOERT doses of 7.5 to 25 Gy with 6‐MeV to 15‐MeV electrons.
Median follow‐up of 11.6 years (range, 2.1 to 25.5 y), 13 patients (65%) alive NED.
Gross total resection superior local control (88% vs. 67%) and survival (71% vs. 33%)
IOERT in combination with surgery and EBRT for the management of pediatric solid malignancies provides excellent local control with reasonable toxicity, given the unfavorable medical conditions of the patient population studied. Long‐term survival in this population also is encouraging, particularly when GTR is achieved. These results suggest that IOERT should continue to be considered as an integral part of a multimodality regimen for pediatric solid malignancies, especially in younger patients with abdominopelvic malignancies.
Excellent Local Control and Survival After Intraoperative and External Beam Radiotherapy for Pediatric Solid Tumors: Long‐term Follow‐up of the Mayo Clinic Experience
Stauder, Michael C. MD*; Laack, Nadia N.I. MD*; Moir, Christopher R. MD†; Schomberg, Paula J. MD*
Journal of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology 33(5), July 2011, p 350–355
18 pts1 local failureMFT 60 months6 significant morbidity
METHODS :1. 1986 – 1998, 23 patients2. IOERT: 4 – 16 MeV, 7 – 16 Gy (10 Gy median)
3. RESULTS :
4. 18p total resection6p (26%) recurrences5. No long‐term survivors in 5 patients with subtotal resection6. IOERT alone offers a good local control after R0. 7. If tumor residual, EBRT is mandatory.
IOERT: HIGH RISK PEDIATRIC NEUROBLASTOMAHaas‐Kogan et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2000;47:985‐92
No EBRT
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio MarañonMadrid, Spain
1995‐2017>1.500 IOERT procedures
3% pediatric cancer patients
Data reported:
Extremity sarcomas (IJROBPh 2015)Ewing + Rhabdo (IJROBPH 2016)Miscellaneous (abstract)Osteosarcoma (Radiother Oncol 2016)
Interdisciplinary Tumor Board:• Pediatric Surgery• Radiation Oncology ( EBRT, IORT)• Pediatric Oncohematologits (Neoadjuvant +/‐ Adjuvant CT)
Tumor Histologies:• Sarcomas (Osteosarcoma, Soft tissue sarcomas, Ewing)• Neuroblastoma (local advanced tumors, recurrences)• Miscelaneous
Doses IOERT:•mac residual tumor 1250 cGy•mic residual tumor 1000 cGy
• pediatrics 750 cGy• unresected (>3 cm) 1500‐2000 cGy
> 150 dosimetric configurations available
Practica clínica en cáncer de páncreas IOeRT
• 33 pediatrics patients (3.4%); 36 procedures
• Gender: 18 males / 15 females• Age range: 1 month – 17 years• Histologies:
• 10 neuroblastoma N‐II‐92, N‐III‐95. N‐AR‐99
• 7 Ewing sarcoma SEOP 95,98, 99, 01, 02, E‐VAIA, POG 8850• 10 sarcomas SEOP 89, MMT5
• 3 fibromatosis • 1 teratoma• 1 nephroblastoma SIOP 1 Stage I INTERMEDIATE RISK
• 1 PNET SEOP 95,98, 99, 01, 02, E‐VAIA, POG 8850• Stages: 13 stage IV
4 recurrent disease
Experience 01/1995 ‐12/2010
IOERT program: 954 cases
Energy 4 – 18 MeV
Total Doses 500 – 1250 cGy
Applicator size 5 – 15 cm
Fields 1 – 2
EBRT Doses (15 p) 2000 – 5000 cGy
• “Boost” with IOERT in unresected or high risk areas of residual tumors• Anatomic areas:
• extremities: 12 p• intra‐abdominal: 17 p• intra‐ thoracic: 7 p
IOERT
TREATMENT
CHEMOTHERAPY: 29/33 patients
EBRT: 16/33 patients
SURGERY: ‐ R0: 29/36 IORT
‐ R+: 7/36 IORT
OTHER TREATMENTSOTHER TREATMENTS
NEUROBLASTOMA: 67.5%
SARCOMA: 60%
EWING: 57%
LOCAL CONTROL: HISTOLOGYLOCAL CONTROL: HISTOLOGY
• Median follow‐up: 60 months (range 3‐173)
• 14 local recurrences (+14 distant)
11 DWD5 AWD17 NED
LOCAL RECURRENCE‐FREE SURVIVAL (5 y)
62 %
LOCAL RECURRENCE‐FREE SURVIVAL (5 y)
62 %
RESULTSRESULTS
OVERALL SURVIVAL 2010 analysisOVERALL SURVIVAL 2010 analysis
No EBRT
+ EBRT
neuroblastoma IV (5)&
recurrent sarcoma (6)
72 patients (1985‐2015)
Pooled‐analysis CUN + HGUGM IOERT 15‐20 Gy
EBRT 30% (R+)
neoCT 60%
Non‐respondersR1
Size >5cm, R+ for local controlcompesates histology adversity
R1… survival!
37 Ewing / 34 RMS
Recurrent
R1
24%LR @ 10 y
disease status (recurrent), R+ for local controlcompensates R1 if NAT responder
IOeRT in pediatric cancer: results and innovations
• The context: pediatric radiotherapy
• The fundaments: IORT electrons
• The data: clinical experiences
• Innovative developments
Radioterapia intraoperatoria (electrones): I + D +i HGUGM/UC3/UCM/HPC
virtualsurgery virtual simulation
invivo
dosimetry
intraoperativeimaging
automaticdoking
safety
surgicalnavigation beam
navigationclinical data base
laparoscopic
stereotacticroom
image guided surgery
approaches
2006
2018
8 grants
729.851 eur
Productivity
>20 pub > 1q > 64 IF 1 patent 9 PhD Thesis
miniaturizationoptical traking
3D doseestimation
results
Tumor‐bed
assessement
specimenCT
opticregistration
3D
sarcoma: tumor bed + 3D + TLDs
50
Tumor(3D printing)
Tumor bed(3D printing)
TLDs
sarcoma: simulation / registration process
51
sarcoma: post‐CT model 3D
Tumor bed
TLD
sarcoma: 2D dose estimation on 3D CT images
53
Plataforma casos IOERT
56https://www.rsna.org/tfs.aspx
IOERT platform• Software (free)
• Teaching File System (TFS) • Medical Imaging Resource Community (RSNA MIRC)
• Information in private server• Chart• Images• Vídeos…
• Public access login + password57
e‐learning IOeRT
Registering dataRepository of casesClinical consultation
Technical recommendations
Learning‐curve implementationR & D cooperation
Shareing knowledge: global practice
IOeRT in pediatric cancer: results and innovations 2017
• The context: IOERT is feasible and optimizes EBRT
• The fundaments: electrons are efficient indepedent of resection status
• The data: positive clinical data in patients candidates to surgery and EBRT
• Innovative developments: LA miniaturization, in vivo dosimetry, e-learning…