pediatric partial foot prosthesis: a new treatment...

1
Pediatric Partial Foot Prosthesis: A New Treatment Option Vincent DeCataldo, BOCPO, NJ LPO Manager Allard O&P Partnership, Allard USA E-mail: [email protected] METHODS A prosthetic design for treating the pediatric partial foot amputee that restores gait function by addressing the biomechanical deficits is proposed. A custom fit rigid DCC AFO with carbon anteri- or shell, customized with a toe filler type socket with wedging, liſts, and posting are the compo- nents of the proposed prosthesis. Until recently, there was not a custom-fit option for providing a reliable custom-fit rigid DCC structure in which to fabricate a custom prosthesis for the pediatric population. e new custom-fit rigid DCC is a prefabricated full carbon foot plate, rigid lateral strut, and carbon composite anterior shell. e footplate is rigid with a tapered rocker built into the distal section with a flexible posterior section and a rigid stable midfoot. is design aids in restoring gait by allowing for a controlled plantarflexion moment at initial contact, a stable midstance, and a controlled tibial advancement through terminal stance, while maintaining a 3rd rocker rollover and providing propulsion at terminal stance. is system is combined with a custom-molded toe filler type prosthesis that is aligned with wedges, posts, and liſts to maximize functional outcomes. is system addresses the biomechanical deficits of the PFA and the DCC is designed to have varying degrees dynamic func- tion by style and size. e ability to customize the socket, alignment, and interface helps to protect the skin of the residuum while the dynamic func- tion can be customized for functional needs. INTRODUCTION Documentation of pediatric partial foot amputa- tion (PFA), prosthetic intervention, and effec- tiveness of treatment is insufficient. However, recommendations regarding pediatric prosthetic intervention advise downsizing, sequenced complexity, and a modular design that does not interfere with an increased activity level. 2 In the general population, PFA is the most common amputation surgery with 2 per 1,000 affect- ed. 4 Transmetatarsal or mid-tarsal amputations account for approximately 24% of PFAs. 3 In the pediatric population, 40% of amputations are attributed to trauma. 8 Lawn mowers and house- hold accidents account for the majority of the partial foot amputations in the pediatric popula- tion. 8 Current pediatric treatment options mimic those for adults with the extent of the intervention proportional to the extent of tissue lost. 3 More re- cently, it has been recommended that any amputa- tion involving the metatarsal heads or proximal structures requires a prosthetic intervention that extends proximal to the ankle. 6 A prosthesis utilizing a custom-fit rigid dynamic carbon com- posite (DCC) ankle foot orthosis structure to aid in the restoration of gait has been proposed for the adult PFA patient. 7 By extending above the ankle, the prosthesis aids in the progression of the center of pressure along the foot and restores the biomechanics of walking. 6 PATIENT PROFILE VA is a 6.8-year-old female, 42” tall, and weighing 45 lb with congenital longitudinal amputations of both distal lower and upper extremities and no other co-morbidities or congenital malformations. Her intact lower extremity residual limbs are formed by the calcaneus, talus, cuboid, 4th and 5th metatarsals, and the 5th phalanges with a nub distally – her lower limbs appear to be symmet- rical in appearance. Dorsiflexion MMT strength test 5/5 bilaterally. Plantarflexion MMT strength 3/5 bilaterally with the patient able to rise onto the residual lateral toes. She does not normally wear any orthosis or toe filler but uses a high top athletic type shoe to help contain and reduce skin irritation on the medial aspect of her ankle, which is the very prominent aspect of the medial talus. It is recognized that her normal ambulatory status is without orthotic/prosthetic intervention and that the tested interventions of an anterior shell dynamic carbon composite AFO (AKA: Kid- dieROCKER TM ) with an incorporated custom toe filler socket and a toe filler alone were a new condition for the test subject and she did not have an opportunity beyond walking in the office to accommodate to the introduced interventions. However, we found that she was able to accom- modate between each test intervention and ambulate without difficulty. We used the BTS G-WALK gait analysis system to measure tempo- ral-spatial aspects of gait and pelvic girdle angles. We compared data collected with the 2 orthotic/ prosthetic interventions to data collected with the subject wearing her high top shoes. RESULTS e pediatric prosthetic design is proposed based on the outcomes of the adult treatment option with similar outcomes expected. is prosthetic design has been used with adult PFA patients since 2010 and the anecdotal results are positive. Patients report increased mobility and decreased skin breakdown. DISCUSSION Research on specific effects on gait function uti- lizing the proposed PFA DCC design need to be conducted. Preliminary data regarding use of the DCC AFO in the pediatric population indicates that a dynamic response carbon AFO, similar to the rigid DCC design, provides improved func- tion in running, jumping, and walking perfor- mance while Gross Motor Function Measure was also improved. 1 Similar outcomes are expected with a PFA DCC prosthesis due to the similarity of the gross structure and function of the rigid DCC design. REFERENCES 1. Bapty, E et al. CAPO. Victoria, BC Canada, 2012. 2. Cummings, DR & Kapp, SL. JPO; V4, N4, 196, 1992. 3. Dillon, M. O&P Edge; February 2010. 4. Dillon MP et al. Int’l Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, 2013. 5. Dillon, MP. Lower Extremity Review; Feb 2010. 6. Fatone, S. O&P Business News; April 2011. 7. Kennedy, S & Meier, R. e O&P Edge; January 2011. 8. Tooms, RE. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics , chapter 32, 2002. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ank you to VA, Darrick Conley, CPO, Midwest Orthotic & Technology Center, Ed Gordon, CPO, and Sean Wasielewski DISCLOSURE Vincent DeCataldo, BOCPO, NJ LPO is employed by Allard USA, manufacturer of dynamic carbon composite AFOs. Pelvic Rotation Graph:Toe Filler Insert Only Pelvic Rotation Graph: KiddieROCKER TM With Toe Filler Insert

Upload: doanhanh

Post on 28-Aug-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Pediatric Partial Foot Prosthesis: A New Treatment …media.mycrowdwisdom.com.s3.amazonaws.com/aaop/... · partial foot amputations in the pediatric popula- ... Bapty, E et al. CAPO

Pediatric Partial Foot Prosthesis:A New Treatment Option

Vincent DeCataldo, BOCPO, NJ LPO

Manager Allard O&P Partnership, Allard USA E-mail: [email protected]

METHODSA prosthetic design for treating the pediatric partial foot amputee that restores gait function by addressing the biomechanical deficits is proposed. A custom fit rigid DCC AFO with carbon anteri-or shell, customized with a toe filler type socket with wedging, lifts, and posting are the compo-nents of the proposed prosthesis. Until recently, there was not a custom-fit option for providing a reliable custom-fit rigid DCC structure in which to fabricate a custom prosthesis for the pediatric population. The new custom-fit rigid DCC is a prefabricated full carbon foot plate, rigid lateral strut, and carbon composite anterior shell. The footplate is rigid with a tapered rocker built into the distal section with a flexible posterior section and a rigid stable midfoot. This design aids in restoring gait by allowing for a controlled plantarflexion moment at initial contact, a stable midstance, and a controlled tibial advancement through terminal stance, while maintaining a 3rd rocker rollover and providing propulsion at terminal stance. This system is combined with a custom-molded toe filler type prosthesis that is aligned with wedges, posts, and lifts to maximize functional outcomes. This system addresses the biomechanical deficits of the PFA and the DCC is designed to have varying degrees dynamic func-tion by style and size. The ability to customize the socket, alignment, and interface helps to protect the skin of the residuum while the dynamic func-tion can be customized for functional needs.

INTRODUCTIONDocumentation of pediatric partial foot amputa-tion (PFA), prosthetic intervention, and effec-tiveness of treatment is insufficient. However, recommendations regarding pediatric prosthetic intervention advise downsizing, sequenced complexity, and a modular design that does not interfere with an increased activity level.2 In the general population, PFA is the most common amputation surgery with 2 per 1,000 affect-ed.4 Transmetatarsal or mid-tarsal amputations account for approximately 24% of PFAs.3 In the pediatric population, 40% of amputations are attributed to trauma.8 Lawn mowers and house-hold accidents account for the majority of the partial foot amputations in the pediatric popula-tion.8 Current pediatric treatment options mimic those for adults with the extent of the intervention proportional to the extent of tissue lost.3 More re-cently, it has been recommended that any amputa-tion involving the metatarsal heads or proximal structures requires a prosthetic intervention that extends proximal to the ankle.6 A prosthesis utilizing a custom-fit rigid dynamic carbon com-posite (DCC) ankle foot orthosis structure to aid in the restoration of gait has been proposed for the adult PFA patient.7 By extending above the ankle, the prosthesis aids in the progression of the center of pressure along the foot and restores the biomechanics of walking.6

PATIENT PROFILEVA is a 6.8-year-old female, 42” tall, and weighing 45 lb with congenital longitudinal amputations of both distal lower and upper extremities and no other co-morbidities or congenital malformations. Her intact lower extremity residual limbs are formed by the calcaneus, talus, cuboid, 4th and 5th metatarsals, and the 5th phalanges with a nub distally – her lower limbs appear to be symmet-rical in appearance. Dorsiflexion MMT strength test 5/5 bilaterally. Plantarflexion MMT strength 3/5 bilaterally with the patient able to rise onto the residual lateral toes.

She does not normally wear any orthosis or toe filler but uses a high top athletic type shoe to help contain and reduce skin irritation on the medial aspect of her ankle, which is the very prominent aspect of the medial talus.

It is recognized that her normal ambulatory status is without orthotic/prosthetic intervention and that the tested interventions of an anterior shell dynamic carbon composite AFO (AKA: Kid-dieROCKERTM) with an incorporated custom toe filler socket and a toe filler alone were a new condition for the test subject and she did not have an opportunity beyond walking in the office to accommodate to the introduced interventions.

However, we found that she was able to accom-modate between each test intervention and ambulate without difficulty. We used the BTS G-WALK gait analysis system to measure tempo-ral-spatial aspects of gait and pelvic girdle angles. We compared data collected with the 2 orthotic/prosthetic interventions to data collected with the subject wearing her high top shoes.

RESULTSThe pediatric prosthetic design is proposed based on the outcomes of the adult treatment option with similar outcomes expected. This prosthetic design has been used with adult PFA patients since 2010 and the anecdotal results are positive. Patients report increased mobility and decreased skin breakdown.

DISCUSSIONResearch on specific effects on gait function uti-lizing the proposed PFA DCC design need to be conducted. Preliminary data regarding use of the DCC AFO in the pediatric population indicates that a dynamic response carbon AFO, similar to the rigid DCC design, provides improved func-tion in running, jumping, and walking perfor-mance while Gross Motor Function Measure was also improved.1 Similar outcomes are expected with a PFA DCC prosthesis due to the similarity of the gross structure and function of the rigid DCC design.

REFERENCES1. Bapty, E et al. CAPO. Victoria, BC Canada, 2012.2. Cummings, DR & Kapp, SL. JPO; V4, N4, 196, 1992.3. Dillon, M. O&P Edge; February 2010. 4. Dillon MP et al. Int’l Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, 2013. 5. Dillon, MP. Lower Extremity Review; Feb 2010.6. Fatone, S. O&P Business News; April 2011. 7. Kennedy, S & Meier, R. The O&P Edge; January 2011. 8. Tooms, RE. Atlas of Limb Prosthetics , chapter 32, 2002.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTSThank you to VA, Darrick Conley, CPO, Midwest Orthotic & Technology Center, Ed Gordon, CPO, and Sean Wasielewski

DISCLOSUREVincent DeCataldo, BOCPO, NJ LPO is employed by Allard

USA, manufacturer of dynamic carbon composite AFOs.

Pelvic Rotation Graph: Toe Filler Insert Only

Pelvic Rotation Graph: KiddieROCKERTM With Toe Filler Insert