peer observation for self evaluation. o 2008-2012: no formal in-house development opportunity o...

11
SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION

Upload: chad-hubbard

Post on 30-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

PEER OBSERVATION FOR

SELF EVALUATION

Page 2: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

THE CONTEXTo 2008-2012: No formal in-house

development opportunityo 2012-2013: Peer observation

conducted but no input provided beforehand

o Oct. 2013: Input followed by peer observation (one per semester)

Page 3: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

THE PROCESSInput (rationale & purpose, foci, tools

& techniques, code of conduct, feedback language)

Page 4: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

POST PEER OBSERVATION REFLECTION FORM

Filled in by the observed teacherI. FOCI OF OBSERVATION & TOOL USED TO

OBSERVE EACHII. EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE IN

THESE AREAS DRAWING UPON EVIDENCE FROM OBSERVATION

III. ACTION PLAN TO ENHANCE EFFECTIVENESS OF LESSONS

IV. GAINS FROM THE PEER OBSERVATION PROCESS

Page 5: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

ISSUES OF COMMON CONCERNo Clarity of instructions o TTT vs. STTo Learner involvement &

encouragement o Error correction o Variety in interaction patterns o Timing o Rapport o Monitoring o Use of aids & technology

Page 6: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

ISSUES OF SEEMINGLY LITTLE CONCERN

o Suitability of materials and methods for level & type of learners

o Sensitivity to learners’ level of languageo Checking of learning o Achievement of objectives o Contextualizationo Handling of text, lexis, structure, etc.o Teacher questionso L1 use o Voice o Eye contact / blind spoto Presence, confidence

Page 7: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

STRENGTHS COMMONLY MENTIONEDo Friendly atmosphere / mutual respect / humor o Student motivationo Learner involvement & encouragemento Choice of appropriate error correction

techniqueo Monitoringo TTT / Little echoing & rephrase o Timing o Use of visual aids / technology o Instructions & modelingo Suitability of materials and methods for the

level of learners

Page 8: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

AREAS COMMONLY IDENTIFIED FOR IMPROVEMENT

o TTT/ Parroting / echoingo Instructions & modelingo Choosing between immediate & delayed error

correctiono Choosing the appropriate error correction techniqueo Pronunciation practiceo Variety in interaction patterns / group or pair work

rather than whole class activitieso Teacher questions to encourage discussion /

elicitationo Wait time / abiding by time limits set

Page 9: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

ISSUES THAT EMERGED

o Choosing broad aspects like “classroom management”

o Not following up on areas previously set for improvement

o Judgmental language during feedback

Page 10: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

SOME GAINS MENTIONED

o … the opportunity to become aware of the choices …I consciously make in class...

o Conducting group work was something I felt very confident about. However, from the perspective of another teacher, I realized there were actually things that I should improve.

o …We have a lot to learn from each other…o The suggestions she presented …helped me to start

dealing with this problem...o After I was observed, I came to the understanding that I should

go on …, which motivated me…o …we had the opportunity to compare our students’

performance and attitude towards English ... o … being observed by a colleague helped me gain a different

awareness and feel confident…o ... dialogue with colleagues what …most important for

students …how to best design a lesson…learn about classroom management and questioning techniques from observing other teachers…

Page 11: PEER OBSERVATION FOR SELF EVALUATION. o 2008-2012: No formal in-house development opportunity o 2012-2013: Peer observation conducted but no input provided

SCHOOL OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES

PEER OBSERVATION FOR

SELF [email protected]