people of the sunnah - dajjaal.com

بيان تلبيس الدجاجلة

UNCOVERING THE DECEPTION OF THE GREAT LIARS

An Insight into Why Hijāb and His Co-conspirators Slander People of the Sunnah

Part 3b: Digital Evidence Tampering—Forensic

Analysis of the Audio Clip’s Filename and Created

and Modified Dates—Dajājilah Exposed

DAJJAAL.COM — MANHAJ.COM

UNCOVERING THE DECEPTION OF THE GREAT LIARS — 2

dajjaal.com — manhaj.com

الحمد لله والصلاة والسلام على رسول الله

In Part 3 of this series we used the evidence of undisputed existing

historical record—a conference on 10th September 2005 that

was attended by thousands of people—to show the impossibility

of the fraudulent date concocted by the Dajājilah for the lecture I

allegedly gave on that evening according to them.

In this article, we are going to look at some obvious signs of

digital evidence tampering and hiding. However, to understand

the series of events properly, we have to be clear about the dates.

So on 31st May 2020, the Dajājilah published the video on the

tube in which they used a 2 minute clip from my lecture of 27th

February 2010 to malign me.

On 1st June 2020—while I had no idea of the source and date of

the lecture in question—I re-published a document which was the

very one I used for the lecture in question, the one in which

Sulaymān () is being exonerated and freed from the false

allegation of the Jews. I also added a statement to the end of it.

On the back foot, the Dajājilah then tampered with the file

metadata and chose 10th September 2005 as their fabricated

date. They did this so they could provide “indisputable evidence”

to their audience that I had lied when I said that the talk was



around 2010 or thereafter in my article of 1 June 2020. The

accusation of lying could be quickly spread through cyberspace to

hundreds of thousands and the accusation would stick, with the

knowledge that the audience would never have the means

available to them to make their own investigation and verify. To

this end, they published a video on 4th June 2020 with this

accusation of lying about the date.

Meanwhile, investigations were made about the source of the clip

and some days later we traced the original lecture, and found

brothers who had the original CD set. The set was collected,

verified to be the lecture in question and ripped to MP3.

This means that Hijāb and his co-Dajājilah conspired between the

1st and the 4th of June upon their plot, and engaged in digital

evidence tampering and concealment. Note that the evidence of

tampering and digital fraud is already established by virtue of the

evidence in Part 3a of this series. The fraud has already been

busted through historical record alone, and we don’t even need

any digital forensics. The game is already over. However, this is

just to make sure we close all the gaps and do the job properly.

THE FORENSICS

Now, before we look at evidence of tampering of metadata of the

file in their possession, I will present here a screenshot of the

metadata of the audio file we have of the full lecture that was

ripped to MP3 from the CD we found. You will see how the created

and modifed dates appear, along with the size of the file.



The MP3 file had been uploaded to Dropbox, from which it was

downloaded onto a local machine. Note the file size, it is roughly

170 MB in size. Once this is clear, now let us look at some

screenshots presented by the Dajājilah in their videos and social

media as evidence for their fraudulent claim.



Image 1. File metadata provided by the Dajājilah.

This is from a Windows PC, and you can see a file size 176 MB that

corresponds to our file size. This is an indication that the file was

likely to have been ripped from a CD, and due to typical or default

encoding settings, the file sizes are roughly equal. This is proof

that the Dajājilah had the full audio lecture and not just a clip. This

is proof that they engaged in fabrication and fraud with full

knowledge and intent. You can also see an unusual discrepancy

between the created date and the modified date, almost 15 years.

Note also the very suspicious looking time of 01:00:00 next to the

modified date.



Image 2. The created and modified date:

In the above screenshot of a Mac, a folder is shown on the Desktop

folder and it has been named: “Abu Iyaad Magic 10-09-05”. This

has been manually created and given that folder name by the

fraudster so it appears as evidence that the file was recorded on

that date. However, all it shows is that the fraudster created a

folder with that name, nothing more. It is not evidence of anything

save the balādah (docility) and sadhājah (primitiveness) of the

fraudster.



Image 3. Next, they move to the file.

Image 4. The following details are shown:

Note the date added shows as: 03/06/2020 and the date modified

is 16/09/2005 at exactly 01:00am, almost a 15 years difference.



Image 5. The fraudster(s) point out:

They claim the date of the lecture is 10th September 2005 and the

date of the file is “from 16th of September 2005”.

Image 6. In another image—which is really interesting—we are

shown the following:



We have made this image available for download

because there is something very interesting about

it, something you can check for yourself. Please

download it from the link below. The image is from

the hate-filled, venomous creature known as

“Hajji” but whose real name is Mohammad

Naheem Safdar according to what I am told, and I have heard

that he is referred to as “the donkey from Birmingham”. When you

read of his antics further below, you will see that this is not far off.

When you have this file on your machine or smartphone, zoom in

on the area right at the end of the second red line. You should be

able to see the word “leeds” underneath the red line, without

having to do any filtering or contrasting on the image. You can just

about work the letters out. Click the following link or copy and

paste in your browser.

http://www.dajjaal.com/liar/assets/images/magic-talk-date-claim-3.jpg

Image 7. Filter and correction applied to above image in order to

reveal size and path details blotted out in red.





The information that the fraudster(s) attempted to hide was the

file size and also the folder and file name. Note that application

of filters and colour correction can lead to some degree of

distortion in images.

So the file size is around 165 MB on the Mac. This matches with

our file size of the CD rip, at around 170 MB and also the file size of

their version of the full lecture on the PC, which is around 175 MB.

You get these differences because of slight variations in encoding

settings, but since they are generally at typical default settings,

you will get roughly the same size file for a given length of audio.

In this case, the talk was one hour and 15 minutes in length and it

gave an average size of 170 MB. This is evidence to support the

fact that they did have the full lecture and hence, knew exactly

what they were doing. It was deliberate, calculated, pre-

meditated act of conspiracy to commit fraud. As for the file path,

you can clearly see that the file path, without the extension

shown, is:

Macintosh HD/Users/[currently not able to decipher this

part]/Desktop/leeds magic 10-09-05

Note how they tried to cover up the word “leeds”, because that

would have given the game away, as it would provide a lead for

further investigation. You can download this image here:

http://www.dajjaal.com/liar/assets/images/magic-talk-date-

claim-3-contrast.jpg

This much data is enough, we can now make some analysis in

what follows.

http://www.dajjaal.com/liar/assets/images/magic-talk-date-claim-3-contrast.jpg

http://www.dajjaal.com/liar/assets/images/magic-talk-date-claim-3-contrast.jpg



ANALYSIS OF THE FRAUD AND DECEPTION OF THE DAJĀJILAH

To be honest, there is not much to say in terms of analysis, the

fraud is clearly evident. We know that they have all operated as

a team, and hence, they all go down as a team.



The four Dajājilah—ʿAbd al-Ḥamīd1, Muḥammad Ḥijāb and the two

very annoying donkeys at the end—all engaged in conspiracy—in a

collective sense—with respect to whatever follows:

1. They had the full audio lecture and thus, would have known

what I explained in Part 2 of this series. They knew of their

injustice, that they are motivated by desire and that they are

engaged in clear deception.

2. The evidence suggests that they got the file of the full lecture

from a CD. When I published my article regarding Sulaymān

() on 1st June 2020, they embarked upon their fraud and

thought of a way to accuse me of lying when I said the lecture was

some time around 2010 or thereafter.

3. In Image 1 you can see that the file created date is 02 June

2020, whereas the modified date is 16 September 2005. That’s

almost a 15 year discrepancy. It is clear that the modified date

has been modified in one of two ways. Either through a piece of

software that allows file metadata editing, or by ripping the CD or

saving the file from elsewhere, then changing the system date to

the desired date, 16 September 2005. Then opening the file and

editing it, then saving it. The modified date of the file will now

show the system date. This can be done by anyone on their own

computer with any file and anyone can freely search online to see

how this can be done.

1 It is said that he is the owner of the account on the tube that is used to attack

Salafis online. Since, the connection between them all is clearly established, it

seems that this has good weight behind it.



4. In Image 6, which is from the video of Hajji, the fraudster tried

to conceal part of the filename, the part that says, “leeds”. He did

not do a very good job, clearly not enough haylage. Why did he

hide the name of the location “leeds”. The reason is clear and

obvious to the reader.

I think the reader has had probably had enough. There are

sufficient lines of evidence just from these image that these

fraudsters—unable to hold back that seething hatred that

consumes them—lost their minds, and did what they did,

thinking they would get away with it. Imagine how much of this

type of shenanigans they have already got away with.

In conclusion, we say that the lines are clearly drawn. You are

either with us or you are with the “terrorists”. Meaning, those

who terrorise Muslims against Ahl al-Sunnah, the Salafis, by

engaging in these types of behaviours of fraud and deception, and

scaring them away from people who would otherwise guide them

to truth, guidance and righteous conduct.

No sane person—after learning of what we have covered in this

series—can remain attached to these people, or listen to them. If

the scholars of the Muslims abandoned the speech of one who

misled or tricked a donkey in the matter of its food, then how

about the one who misleads hundreds of thousands of people in

the manner outlined in matters of religion. Can such a person be

trusted in worldly affairs, let alone the affairs of religion?

So the lines are now clearly drawn. If you are seen with any of

these Dajājilah and choose their company, after this knowledge



has come to you, then you will be considered an aider and abetter

and will be thrown alongside them. You will be treated as one who

does not value what Allāh () and His Messenger () have

placed value upon, which is truthfulness and honesty and treated

as one who knowingly loves falsehood and its people.

We ask Allāh for sincerity and firmness and from protection from

tribulations and evil.

Abū ʿIyaaḍ—@abuiyaadsp

21 Shawwāl 1441 / 13 June 2020—v.1.02

people of the sunnah - dajjaal.com

Documents