peran perguruan tinggi dalam era global

Kuliah Perdana Mahasiswa BaruKuliah Perdana Mahasiswa BaruFakultas Ekonomi Universitas Darma Persada Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Darma Persada

Tahun Akademik 2004Tahun Akademik 2004--20052005

P P Ti iP P Ti i

Tahun Akademik 2004Tahun Akademik 2004--2005 2005

Peran Perguruan Tinggi Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Globaldalam Era Globaldalam Era Globaldalam Era Global

Oleh: Oleh: Drs. Dadang Solihin, MADrs. Dadang Solihin, MADrs. Dadang Solihin, MADrs. Dadang Solihin, MA

Jakarta, 21 September 2004Jakarta, 21 September 2004

Dadang Solihin’s ProfileDadang Solihin’s ProfileDadang holds a MA degree (Economics), University of Colorado, USA. His previous post is Head, Center for Research

Dadang Solihin s ProfileDadang Solihin s Profilep p

Data and Information at DPD Secretariat General as well as Deputy Director for Information of Spatial Planning and Land Use Management at Indonesian National Development

Beside working as Assistant Professor at Graduate School of Asia-

Use Management at Indonesian National Development Planning Agency (Bappenas).

gPacific Studies, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan, he also active as Associate Professor at University of Darma Persada, Jakarta, Indonesia.

He got various training around the globe included the Training Seminar on He got various training around the globe, included the Training Seminar on Land Use and Management, Taiwan (2004); Developing Multimedia Applications for Managers, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2003); Applied Policy D l t T i i V C d (2002) L l G tDevelopment Training, Vancouver, Canada (2002); Local Government Administration Training Course, Hiroshima, Japan (2001); and Regional Development and Planning Training Course, Sapporo, Japan (1999). He published more than five books regarding local autonomous.

You can reach Dadang Solihin by email at [email protected] or by his mobile at +62812 932 2202mobile at +62812 932 2202

3dadang-solihin.blogspot.com

M t i K li hMateri Kuliah• Apa itu Globalisasi?• Bagaimana kesiapan kita sejauh ini? (SDM• Bagaimana kesiapan kita sejauh ini? (SDM,

sosial-ekonomi, infrastruktur, dll)• Bagaimana peran PT?• Bagaimana peran PT?

dadangdadang--solihin.blogspot.comsolihin.blogspot.com 4

Gl b li iGlobalisasi

• Globalisasi telah memperluas jangkauan kegiatan ekonomi sehingga tidak lagi terbatas pada suatu negara.sehingga tidak lagi terbatas pada suatu negara.

• Kemajuan teknologi, khususnya dalam bidang informasi, komunikasi dan transportasi telah memungkinkan aruskomunikasi, dan transportasi, telah memungkinkan arus orang, barang, jasa, dan informasi bergerak dengan jauh lebih cepat dalam jumlah yang makin besar dengan kualitas yangcepat, dalam jumlah yang makin besar, dengan kualitas yang makin baik, dan dengan biaya yang makin murah.

• Yang akan keluar sebagai pemenang dan memperoleh• Yang akan keluar sebagai pemenang dan memperoleh manfaat dari globalisasi adalah yang telah secara mantap mempersiapkan dirimempersiapkan diri.


Use UsePilihannya:Pilihannya: Be used Isolated Be used Isolated

• global production by

Isolated IsolatedResults:

g p ytransnational company

• opening domestic market to foreignersforeigners

• more open domestic financial markets

• reduce government’s role in provision of goods and servicesservices


Priorities for developmentMillennium Development Goals (2000s)

p

Politics (1990s) good governance; participation, transparency, accountabilityg g ; p p , p y, y

Public Management (1980s)Reform

Policies (1980s) stabilization; structural adjustment

Programmes (1970s)Programmes (1970s) for integrated development

Plans and strategies (1960s)g ( )in command economies

Projects (1950s) t t d l tto promote developmentPoverty relief (1940s)

after war, faminee w , e

Human Development Indexp

• Life expectancy at birth • Adult literacy rate (%ages 15 and above)• Life expectancy at birth • Adult literacy rate (%ages 15 and above)

1 Norway 0.956

y ( g )• Combined gross enrolment ratio for

primary, secondary, and tertiary schools

y ( g )• Combined gross enrolment ratio for

primary, secondary, and tertiary schools p y, y, y(%)

• GDP per capita (PPP US$)

p y, y, y(%)

• GDP per capita (PPP US$) • Life expectancy index • Education index • Life expectancy index • Education index

111 Indonesia 0.692

• Penduduk yang kualitasnya rendah nilai HDI-nya mendekati 0, sedang yang baik mendekati 1.

177 Sierra Leone 0.273mendekati 0, sedang yang baik mendekati 1.

High Human DevelopmentMedium Human Development

Low Human DevelopmentMedium High Medium Low

1 Norway 0 956 29 Barbados 56 Bulgaria 99 Belize 142 Pakistan1 Norway 0.956 2 Sweden 3 Australia 4 Canada 5 Netherlands 6 Belgium 7 I l d

29 Barbados 30 Cyprus 31 Malta 32 Czech Republic 33 Brunei Darussalam 34 Argentina 35 S h ll

56 Bulgaria 57 Russian Federation 58 Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 59 Malaysia 60 Macedonia,TFYR 61 Panama 62 B l

99 Belize 100 Ecuador 101 Iran,Islamic Rep.of 102 Palestinian Territories 103 El Salvador 104 Guyana 105 C V d

142 Pakistan 143 Togo 144 Congo 145 Lesotho 146 Uganda 147 Zimbabwe 148 K7 Iceland

8 United States 9 Japan 10 Ireland 11 Switzerland 12 United Kingdom

i l d

35 Seychelles 36 Estonia 37 Poland 38 Hungary 39 Saint Kitts and Nevis 40 Bahrain

i h i

62 Belarus 63 Tonga 64 Mauritius 65 Albania 66 Bosnia and Herzegovina 67 Suriname

l

105 Cape Verde 106 Syrian Arab Republic 107 Uzbekistan 108 Algeria 109 Equatorial Guinea 110 Kyrgyzstan

148 Kenya 149 Yemen 150 Madagascar 151 Nigeria 152 Mauritania 153 Haiti

jib i13 Finland 14 Austria 15 Luxembourg 16 France 17 Denmark 18 New Zealand

41 Lithuania 42 Slovakia 43 Chile 44 Kuwait 45 Costa Rica 46 Uruguay

68 Venezuela 69 Romania 70 Ukraine 71 Saint Lucia 72 Brazil 73 Colombia

111 Indonesia 0.692 112 Viet Nam 113 Moldova,Rep.of 114 Bolivia 115 Honduras 116 Tajikistan

154 Djibouti 155 Gambia 156 Eritrea 157 Senegal 158 Timor-Leste 159 Rwanda

19 Germany 20 Spain 21 Italy 22 Israel 23 Hong Kong,China 24 Greece

47 Qatar 48 Croatia 49 United Arab Emirates 50 Latvia 51 Bahamas 52 Cuba

74 Oman 75 Samoa (Western)76 Thailand 77 Saudi Arabia 78 Kazakhstan 79 Jamaica

117 Mongolia 118 Nicaragua 119 South Africa 120 Egypt 121 Guatemala 122 Gabon

160 Guinea 161 Benin 162 Tanzania,U.Rep.of163 Côte d ’Ivoire164 Zambia 165 Malawi

25 Singapore 26 Portugal 27 Slovenia 28 Korea,Rep.of

53 Mexico 54 Trinidad and Tobago 55 Antigua and Barbuda

80 Lebanon 81 Fiji 82 Armenia 83 Philippines 84 Maldives 85 Peru

123 São Tomé and Principe 124 Solomon Islands 125 Morocco 126 Namibia 127 India 128 Botswana

166 Angola 167 Chad 168 Congo,Dem.Rep.of the 169 Central African Rep. 170 Ethiopia 171 Mozambique85 Peru

86 Turkmenistan 87 St.Vincent &the Grenadines88 Turkey 89 Paraguay 90 Jordan 91 Azerbaijan

128 Botswana 129 Vanuatu 130 Cambodia 131 Ghana 132 Myanmar 133 Papua New Guinea 134 Bhutan

171 Mozambique 172 Guinea-Bissau 173 Burundi 174 Mali 175 Burkina Faso 176 Niger 177 Sierra Leone 0 27391 Azerbaijan

92 Tunisia 93 Grenada 94 China 95 Dominica 96 Sri Lanka 97 Georgia

134 Bhutan 135 Lao People’s Dem.Rep.136 Comoros 137 Swaziland 138 Bangladesh 139 Sudan 140 Nepal

177 Sierra Leone 0.273

Sources: www.undp.org 97 Georgia 98 Dominican

140 Nepal 141 Cameroon

W ld C titi Y b k 2004World Competitiveness Yearbook 20041 USA 100 000

The Breakdown of Competitiveness FactorsEconomic

PerformanceGovernment

EfficiencyBusiness

Efficiency Infrastructure

1 USA 100.000

Performance Efficiency Efficiency• Domestic Economy

• Public Finance

• Productivity • Basic Infrastructurey

• International Trade

• Fiscal Policy • Labor Market • Technological Infrastructure

• International Investment

• Institutional Framework

• Finance • Scientific Infrastructure

• Employment • Business • Management • Health and• Employment • Business Legislation

• Management Practices

• Health and Environment

• Prices • Education • Impact of • Value SystempGlobalization

y

58 Indonesia 38.095

60 Venezuela 24.74810dadang-solihin.blogspot.com

THE WORLD COMPETITIVENESS SCOREBOARD 2004

1 USA 100.000 21 Germany 73.435 41 Colombia 57.3702 Singapore 89.008 22 United Kingdom 72.186 42 Hungary 57.2093 C d 86 626 23 J 71 915 43 C h R 56 4403 Canada 86.626 23 Japan 71.915 43 Czech Rep 56.440

4 Australia 86.046 24 China 70.725 44 Greece 56.3465 Iceland 86.015 25 Belgium 70.324 45 Slovenia 55.4986 Hong Kong 85.765 26 Chile 69.901 46 Lombardy 55.2707 Denmark 84.378 27 Catalonia 69.802 47 Sao Paulo 55.0088 Finland 83.636 28 Estonia 68.426 48 Jordan 54.1319 Luxembourg 83.083 29 Thailand 68.235 49 South Africa 53.786

10 Ireland 80.303 30 France 67.673 50 Russia 52.14011 Sweden 79.578 31 Spain 67.414 51 Italy 50.30712 Taiwan 79.543 32 Ile-De-France 64.646 52 Philippines 49.66613 Austria 78.933 33 Israel 63.458 53 Brazil 48.13014 Switzerland 78.809 34 India 62.971 54 Romania 47.99715 Netherlands 78.613 35 Korea 62.201 55 Turkey 43.45916 Malaysia 75.919 36 Scotland 62.026 56 Mexico 43.23917 Norway 75.468 37 Rhone-Alps 61.429 57 Poland 41.95318 New Zealand 74.394 38 Maharashtra 59.557 58 Indonesia 38.09519 Zhejiang 74.265 39 Portugal 58.485 59 Argentina 36.93720 Bavaria 73.730 40 Slovak Rep 57.462 60 Venezuela 24.748

Sources: International Institute for Management Developmentwww01.imd.ch/wcy/ranking/

Cl t f llClusters of excellence

1. Top academic or commercial research facilities;2 At least a handful of entrepreneurs with strong role2. At least a handful of entrepreneurs with strong role

models;3 T li i i ll k i d i l3. Tax policies, especially on stock options and capital

gains, that do not discourage entrepreneurs;4. An infrastructure of professional services companies;5. An outward-looking commercial tradition;5. An outward looking commercial tradition;6. A pool of local investors that specialize in early-stage

technology companies;technology companies;7. A great place to live as well as work.

Sources: Forbes Globe magazine 12dadang-solihin.blogspot.com

The Hierarchy of the Citiesy

LondonB l

Moscow

CopenhagenStockholm

ChicagoN Y k

多倫多San Francisco Paris TokyoFrankfurtSeoul

Beijing

Brussels

Zurich

Los AngelesNew York

MiamiHuston

MadridMilan TaipeiHong Kong

Bangkok

Shanghai Osaka

MexicoBangkok Manila

Kuala Lumpur

San Paulo

B Ai

SingaporeSydney

Buenos Aires Johannesburg Melbourne Santo Domingocore city

semi peripherysemi-periphery

periphery 13dadang-solihin.blogspot.com

Indonesia Ranking Berapa ya .??

THE BEST PLACES IN THE WORLD TO START A BUSINESS 2002

p y

1 USA 14 Spain 2 Singapore 15 Malaysia

BUSINESS 2002

2 Singapore 15 Malaysia 3 Hong Kong 16 Israel 4 Ireland 17 China 5 UK 18 Korea 6 Belgium 19 Italy 7 Australia 20 India 8 Taiwan 21 Brazil 9 Fi l d 22 F9 Finland 22 France

10 Netherlands 23 Mexico 11 Germany 24 South Africa11 Germany 24 South Africa 12 Japan 25 Poland 13 Sweden

Sources: www.forbes.com/global/2001/0528/070.html

Internet Users in Asia (2000)Internet Users in Asia (2000)( )( )

N b fN b f %%RankRank CountryCountry Number of Number of Internet UsersInternet Users

% % populationpopulation

1 Hong Kong 3 460 000 48%China

S.KoreaN.Korea

Japan

Mangolia

China

S.KoreaN.Korea

Japan

Mangolia

1 Hong Kong 3,460,000 48%

2 Singapore 1,850,000 44%

3 South Korea 16,000,000 34%

China

Hong KongMacao

India

Philippines

Taiwan

China

Hong KongMacao

India

Philippines

Taiwan

3 South Korea 16,000,000 34%

4 Japan 38,000,000 30%

5 Taiwan 6,400,000 29%Indonesia

ThailandMalaysia

Philippines

Indonesia

ThailandMalaysia

Philippines

6 Malaysia 1,500,000 7%

7 Thailand 1,000,000 1.6%

SingaporeSingapore

8 China 17,000,000 1.3%

9 Philippines 500,000 0.6%

10 India 4,500,000 0.45%

11 Indonesia 400,000 0.18%

12 Vi 100 000 0 13%12 Vietnam 100,000 0.13%

Source: http://www.nua.ie

Knowledge-based EconomyKnowledge based Economy

• New economic is powered by technology, driven b id d i i i d iby ideas, rooted in innovation and enterprise. (Bill Clinton)

• Knowledge-based economy are those which are directly based on the production, distribution anddirectly based on the production, distribution and utilization of knowledge and information. [OECD ]K l d b d th t i• Knowledge-based economy mean that economic activities which are directly or indirectly

d i k l d i f i dpromoted via knowledge, information, and innovation.


InnovationInnovation

• Innovation is the spirit of knowledge-based economy however it’s difficult to get someeconomy, however, it s difficult to get some innovative achievements without high quality of human resourceshuman resources.

• Education is the foundation of knowledge-based economy for knowledge production, distribution, and application. Besides, high quality of human pp , g q yresources must be based on good education.

• I ti t f k l d i t lth• Innovation can transform knowledge into wealth and create additional value of products.


PenutupPenutupPenutupPenutup

Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Global:Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Global:Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Global:Peran Perguruan Tinggi dalam Era Global:

• Menyiapkan SDM yang handal dan berdaya saing tinggi untuk dapat mengejar ketinggalan dari negara-negara lain.

• Daya saing yang bersumber dari kualitas manusia harus makin diandalkan karena y g y gbangsa Indonesia tidak bisa terus-menerus mengandalkan tenaga kerja dan sumber alam yang dihargai murah.

T i K ihT i K ihT i K ihT i K ihTerima KasihTerima KasihTerima KasihTerima Kasih18dadang-solihin.blogspot.com

peran perguruan tinggi dalam era global

Technology