performance and aging of the babar drift chamber · 2008-02-13 · dch history babar drift chamber...
TRANSCRIPT
Performance and Aging of the BaBarDrift Chamber
Michael H. Kelsey
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center™
B
AB
AR
™&
©
L . de B r unhoff
2008 Super B Factory Workshop, SLAC
14–16 February 2008
DCH History
Outline
• Drift Chamber Design and Operation
• Aging and Wire Damage
• Tracking, dE/dx, and Physics
• Data Acquisition Upgrade
• Summary
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 2
DCH History
BaBar Drift Chamber
IP1618
469236
324 681015 1749
551 973
17.19ÿ20235
Dimensions in mm
24 cm inner radius
81 cm outer radius
2.8 m length
IP 37 cm behind center
Be & Al inner cylinder
Carbon fiber/Nomex outer
2.5 (1.2) cm Al end plates
All electronics on rear
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 7
DCH History
BaBar Drift Chamber
Small hex cells (1∼2 cm)
HEX2 - Wire 168 Isocrones every 50 ns HEX2 - Wire 185 Isocrones every 50 ns
10 superlayers of 4 layers each
Axial and stereo (∼ 4◦)
96–256 cells/superlayer
Sense wires 20 µm W-Rh (Au)
Field wires 120 µm Al (Au)
Guard wires 80 µm Al (Au)
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 8
DCH History
Construction
High-bay Class 1000 clean room at TRIUMF
Chamber volume enclosed in Class 100 clean tent
Measured at 10-20 particles/m3
No contact with wire in chamber or inner surfaces
Automated wire stringing
Operators attached wire from spool to steel rod
Pulled by robot (magnet grip) to opposite endplate
Feedthroughs, crimping outside clean tent
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 9
DCH History
Operating Parameters
Gas mixture 80% helium, 20% isobutane,
3500–4000 ppm water, ∼ 80 ppm O2
Designed to operate at 1960V
Initially operated without water vapor
Discharges observed in small region of chamber
Reduced to 1900V (October 1999–July 2000)
1930V January 2001–December 2006
1945V since January 2007
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 12
DCH History
Initial Damage
May 1999: 80:20, O2 < 10 ppm, H2O <∼ 100 ppm
28 July 1999: Large spikes in HV current
HV problem in SL6, OUT
Day in July 1999
Cur
rent
(µA
)
Minutes from 7/28/99 7 AM
Cur
rent
(µA
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
28 29 30
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Hit Map High Charge
-100
-80
-60
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
-100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
2000/05/31 11.02
x(cm)y(
cm)
October 1999: Turned off affected region, added water
=⇒ No discharges observed in chamber since
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 13
DCH History
Gain vs. Time
Expect continuous decrease G = G0 exp(−AQ) due
to aging (charge accumulation)
Accumulated Charge (mC/cm)
Cor
rect
ed G
ain
DCH Gain Since Startup (May 1999 - Present)
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30
A B C D E F
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Steps due to operating changes (voltage), transi-
tions between runs (gas mix), etc.
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 16
DCH History
Gain vs. Time
G(Q) = {G0 +∑
∆Gi|Q>Qi} exp(−AQ)
Accumulated Charge (mC/cm)
Cor
rect
ed G
ain
DCH Gain May 1999 - Feb 2008
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30
Aging rate: -0.337± 0.006 %/(mC/cm) over 33.69 mC/cm
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 17
DCH History
Long-term Effects
Sudden damage always a concern, not observed
Transient discharges, voltage trips
Buildup of deposits on wires
Self-sustaining discharge (Malter effect)
Long-term studies of aging remediation
Lu Changguo (Princeton)
Pisa Frontier Detectors Meeting (2003)
Adam Boyarski (SLAC)
DESY Aging Workshop (2001)
IEEE NSS/MIC (2003)
Other groups (Colorado, Montreal, Novosibirsk, ...)
Accumulated several lifetime dose
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 20
DCH History
Suppressing Damage
Running chamber without water vapor allows
polymer (dielectric) buildup, increases likelihood
of discharges
Presumed mechanism for damage seen in July 1999
Princeton test chamber run dry up to 130 mC/cm,
saw discharges, high singles rate, 10% drop in gain
Adding 1500–4000 ppm H2O eliminated discharges
Gain stabilized at 0.9 of initial value, up to 300 mC/cm
Poor performance returned when water removed
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 21
DCH History
Reconstruction Performance
Hit resolution 〈σ(resid)〉 ∼ 125 µm
Target: 140 µm in middle region of cell
Momentum σ(pT )/pT = 0.45% + 0.13% pT (GeV/c)
Target: 0.21% + 0.14% pT
Tracking > 95% matching with SVT
dE/dx resolution ∼ 7.5%, ± (0.5-0.7)% bias
Early test results: 7.0%
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 26
DCH History
Physics Performance
Reconstruction of K0S → π+π− at large radii
)2Vtx+Y
2
Vtx(X√Decay Radius
2M
eV/c
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 10 20 30 40 50
RMS
hwhm
)2Vtx+Y
2
Vtx(X√Decay Radius
2M
eV/c
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
Bea
mP
ipe
Bea
mP
ipe
SV
TS
VT
Su
pp
ort
Su
pp
ort
DC
HD
CH
Fits in DCH comparable to
DCH+SVT
2) GeV/c
os)-M(K-π +πM(
)2Ev
ents/
(0.5 M
eV/c
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
25→Decay Radius 24. Entries = 4932oN
Sig. Events = 4460.50 MeV-0.045771
0.0458304mean = -0.156774RMS = 5.08925 MeV
/Ndof = 197.51/1922χhwhm = 2.38295 MeV
frac1 = 0.474382sigma1 = 3.8942 MeV
frac2 = 0.391389sigma2 = 1.5711 MeV
frac3 = 0.13423sigma3 = 11.4963 MeV
frac4 = 0sigma4 = 0.5 MeV
-0.05 0 0.05
“Jumps” due to material scattering uncertainty and fewer
hits per track fit
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 31
DCH History
High Rate Data Acquisition
Modular, parallel electronics
4-buffer pipeline per channel
16 elements per quadrant
via 1 GHz fiber to processor
Original 1995 design
FEA−3 180 ch
FEA−2 144 ch
FEA−1 96 ch24 ch
16x FEEto DIOM
Readout time set by single element’s occupancy
TDAQ = 8
{
8 +N
∑
(32mi + 4)
}
× 16.7 + 33 ns
N non-empty chips, mi = 1–8 wires (32 bytes) each
=⇒ 45 hits requires 200 µs (5 kHz)
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 33
DCH History
High Rate Data Acquisition
Replace multiplexer with modern FPGA
Implement feature extraction in firmware
Charge (waveform) integration
Leading edge (hit time) finding
Pedestal subtraction
Calibration constants in FPGA memory
Data volume reduced 32 → 6 bytes/channel
Identical data format used for reconstruction
Essentially no deadtime up to 10 kHz trigger rate
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 35
DCH History
Front-end Upgrade
New boards installed during Run 5 (Oct 2005)
Improved diagnostics, programmability vs. original
Firmware downloadable through FPGA to EPROM
via normal DAQ path
“Pass-through” firmware (emulates original front-
end) software selectable through DAQ command
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 36
DCH History
Summary
BaBar Drift Chamber operated for nine years
Tracking performance up to design
dE/dx performance good
Excellent operational efficiency
No substatial problems after startup
Excellent aging rate 0.3% / (mC/cm)
Clean-room construction, comprehensive QA/QC
procedures
Real-time monitoring of environment and data
quality
Electronics upgraded to support luminosity
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 37
DCH History
Supplemental Information
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 38
DCH History
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 3
DCH History
The PEP-II B Factory
Asymmetric e+e− collider: E(e+) = 3.1 GeV, E(e−) = 9 GeV
⇒ 10.58 GeV CMS: Υ(4S) → B+B−, B0B0
B decay length increased from ∼ 30 µm (CMS) to ∼ 250 µm
(lab), allowing precision time-dependent measurements
PEP-II delivers L > 1034 cm−2 s−1
(3× design)
433 fb−1 at Υ(4S), ∼ 9% off-peak
18 fb−1 at Υ(3S) =⇒ 30 fb−1 plan
BaBar operates at > 95% effi-
ciency
]-1
Inte
gra
ted
Lu
min
osi
ty [
fb
0
100
200
300
400
500
Delivered LuminosityRecorded LuminosityRecorded Luminosity Y(4s)Recorded Luminosity Y(3s)Off Peak
BaBarRun 1-7
PEP II Delivered Luminosity: 521.44/fbBaBar Recorded Luminosity: 501.38/fb
BaBar Recorded Y(4s): 432.74/fbBaBar Recorded Y(3s): 21.52/fb
Off Peak Luminosity: 47.11/fb
BaBarRun 1-7
PEP II Delivered Luminosity: 521.44/fbBaBar Recorded Luminosity: 501.38/fb
BaBar Recorded Y(4s): 432.74/fbBaBar Recorded Y(3s): 21.52/fb
Off Peak Luminosity: 47.11/fb
As of 2008/02/12 00:00
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 4
DCH History
BaBar Detector
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 5
DCH History
BaBar Drift Chamber
Main tracking detector in BaBar
Surrounds beam pipe, final focus magnets, and
silicon vertex tracker
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 6
DCH History
Construction QA/QC
Continuous QA/QC monitoring
Tension measured during stringing
Before and after crimping
Daily evaluation of wires and feedthroughs
Replacement done during subsequent shift
Stringing completed in 3 months (Aug–Nov 1997)
Just 19 of 28,768 wires outside specification
Tension, crimps, continuity
Assembly fixture repositioned vertically
Wires removed and restrung in situ
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 10
DCH History
Commissioning
Tested at voltage with operating gas
Mixed in radioisotope (133Xe)
Pulses, singles rates measured for all 7,104 cells
Shipped fully operational, ready for comissioning
Commissioned at SLAC with production DAQ
system before installation in IR-2
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 11
DCH History
Accumulated Charge
Measure aging vs. accumulated charge per unit
wire length
276.4 cm × 7104 cells
= 19.6 km sense wire
400–600 µA w/beams
(0.25 nA/cm)
Recorded every second
DCH Dose May 1999 - Feb 2008
0
10
20
30
0
10
20
30
20000
10
20
30
20010
10
20
30
20020
10
20
30
20030
10
20
30
20040
10
20
30
20050
10
20
30
20060
10
20
30
20070
10
20
30
2008
Acc
umul
ated
Cha
rge
(mC
/cm
)
Total charge 33.7 mC/cm in nine years
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 14
DCH History
Quantifying Gain
Normalize to absorb environmental effects
Pressure and temperature ⇒ density
Detailed gas mixture (He:i-C4H10, H2O, O2)
Precise operating voltage
Compute dE/dx for tracks from Bhabha-scattering
events [e+e− → e+e−(γ)]
Relativistic plateau of Bethe-Bloch curve, fixed
average value
Normalization done ∼ hourly
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 15
DCH History
Gain vs. Time Fit Details
G(Q) = {G0 +∑
∆Gi|Q>Qi} exp(−AQ)
χ2/dof = 1789.58 / 418
−A(%) = −0.337 ± 0.006
G0 = 0.974 ± 0.001
∆G1 = −0.430 ± 0.001 (Q1 = 0.3)
∆G2 = 0.430 ± 0.001 (Q2 = 1.2)
∆G3 = −0.280 ± 0.001 (Q3 = 2.8)
∆G4 = 0.047 ± 0.001 (Q4 = 4.4)
∆G5 = −0.046 ± 0.001 (Q5 = 8.7)
∆G6 = 0.042 ± 0.001 (Q6 = 19.0)
∆G7 = 0.026 ± 0.001 (Q7 = 20.8)
∆G8 = −0.037 ± 0.001 (Q8 = 22.4)
∆G9 = 0.084 ± 0.001 (Q9 = 26.5)
∆G10 = −0.064 ± 0.001 (Q10 = 32.5)
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 18
DCH History
Other Chambers’ Aging
[mC/cm] [%/(mC/cm)]Experiment Gas Mix Charge ∆G/G Aging
CDF Ar:Eth:Alc 130 <1 ∼ 20(Run 2) 50:50:1
ZEUS Ar:Eth:CO2 100 <∼ 0.183:5:12
H1 Ar:Eth:H2O < 10 >∼ 150:50:0.1
HERA-B Ar:CF4:CO2 2300 ∼ none(test) 65:30:5
BaBar He:i-C4H10:H2O 33.6 0.380:20:0.4
From 2001 DESY Workshop presentations
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 19
DCH History
Suppressing Damage
Lu Changguo, Princeton
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 22
DCH History
Suppressing Damage
Lu Changguo, Princeton
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 23
DCH History
Remediating Damage
Excess current can trigger self-sustaining discharges
Maximum safe current significantly reduced over time
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Time (Min)
0
100
200
300
400
500
Ano
de C
urre
nt (
nA)
Adam Boyarski, SLAC
“Training” with oxygen (500 ppm) gradually raises current
limit to original construction. Maintained after O2 removed.
Further study underway to confirm long-term performance
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 24
DCH History
Remediating Damage
Additives (alcohol, water, oxygen) can suppress
discharges, allow running at higher currents
Before With Additive AfterAdditive (%) Imax Time (hr) Imax Imax Cured?
Methylal 4 0.3 ≈0 >8 No2 3 0.4 No
2-Propanol 1.0 ≈0.5 ≈0 >12 No0.5 >10 No0.25 >13 0.2 No
H2O 0.35 0.4 ≈0 >27 No0.18 >9 0.5 No
O2 0.10 0.5 1.5 >32 >40 Yes0.05 0.4 2 >29 >16 Yes0.02 0.9 10 >35 >14 Yes
CO2 5 0.4 35 >40 >27 Yes
O2+H2O 0.4 40 10 3 Partly(0.05+0.35)
Adam Boyarski, SLAC
Temporary 500–1000 ppm O2 running appears to
“cure” discharge problem. Current limit restored
to initial level.
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 25
DCH History
Track Fitting
Residuals of hits vs. distance from wire
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
-1 -0.75 -0.5 -0.25 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1
Mean 125 µm
Signed distance from wire (cm)
Res
olut
ion
(cm
)
〈σ(resid)〉 ∼ 125 µm
Design target: 140 µm in middle region of cell
d(t): pair of 7th order Chebyshev functions, each side of
cell, corrected for angle and position in cell.
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 27
DCH History
Track Fitting
Momentum resolution from cosmic rays
0
1.0
2.0
0 4 8Transverse Momentum (GeV/c)
σ(p t
)/p t
(%
)
1-2001 8583A23
σ(pT )/pT = 0.45% + 0.13% pT (GeV/c)
Design target: 0.21% + 0.14% pT
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 28
DCH History
Tracking Efficiency
Polar Angle (radians)
Transverse Momentum (GeV/c)
Effi
cien
cy
0.6
0.8
1.0
0.6
0.8
1.0
Effi
cien
cy
0 1 2
3-2001 8583A40
1960 V
1900 V
a)
1960 V
1900 V
b)
0.0 0.5 1.51.0 2.0 2.5
“Pseudo-efficiency”
Count DCH+SVT tracks
vs. total SVT tracks
Measure acceptance in
momentum or pT
polar angle
azimuth (not shown)
DCH and SVT not independent
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 29
DCH History
dE/dx, Particle ID
dE/dx vs momentum
10 3
10 4
10-1
1 10Track momentum (GeV/c)
80%
tru
ncat
ed m
ean
(arb
itra
ry u
nits
)
eµ
π
K
p dBABAR
DCH dE/dx - dE/dx(K) (arb. units)
p<0.
6 G
eV/c
Drift Chamber K/π Separation
0
50
-600 -400 -200 0 200
π K
DCH dE/dx - dE/dx(K) (arb. units)
0.6<
p<0.
8
0
100
-600 -400 -200 0 200
π K
DCH dE/dx - dE/dx(K) (arb. units)
0.8<
p<1
0
100
-600 -400 -200 0 200
π K
DCH dE/dx - dE/dx(K)(arb. units)
p>1
GeV
/c
0
1000
-600 -400 -200 0 200
πK
Drift Chamber K/π Separation
BABAR
Good π/K separation up to ∼ 700 MeV/c
Confirms results in DIRC region, adds PID coverage outside
DIRC acceptance
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 30
DCH History
Physics Performance (II)
B → D(∗)D(∗), D∗+ → π+D0, D0 → K−π+
(Monte Carlo generated events)
Momentum σ(p)/p 4.7 × 10−3
D0 → K−π+ σ(mass) 6.5 ± 0.2 MeV/c2
D∗ → π+D0 σ(mass) 0.80 ± 0.03 MeV/c2
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 32
DCH History
High Rate Data Acquisition
Readout time scales with HV current, luminosity
(uniform occupancy)
IDCH (µA)
Rea
do
ut
tim
e (µ
s)
0
50
100
150
200
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
M. Cristinziani, 2004
)-1 s-2 cm33
Luminosity (x 100 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
Dea
dti
me
(%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
Deadtime Projection
Existing DAQ
With upgrade
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007-2010
C. Jessop, 2004
Readout ∼ trigger rate =⇒ non-linear deadtime
Michael H. Kelsey SuperB 2008 34