performance measurement of mems elements

15
Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements for Information Security of G-Cloud Channels Assoc. Prof. Dr. Roumiana Ilieva Silvia Bobeva

Upload: danube-university-krems-centre-for-e-governance

Post on 14-Jun-2015

422 views

Category:

Technology


3 download

DESCRIPTION

4.5.12, Lightning Talks, Main Hall: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements for Information Security of G-Cloud Channels (Roumiana Ilieva, Silvia Bobeva) #CeDEM12

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

for Information Security of G-Cloud Channels

Assoc. Prof. Dr. Roumiana Ilieva

Silvia Bobeva

Page 2: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Indispensabilityof such research

The evolving G-Cloud strategy enthusiasm worldwide needs enormous efforts to provide a reliable security of the information flow through Public Cloud channels. G-Cloud security includes a wide set of controls, technologies, and policies used to protect the associated infrastructure, applications, and data in the Public Cloud. One of these technologies is MEMS-based.

Page 3: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

MEMS world

MEMS is a high-tech field that combines microelectronics and micro-production technology for micro component integration, micro sensors and devices (Sanchez et al, 2010). In a common silicon substrate, micro-hotplates are mainly built on a thin dielectric membrane that is suspended over a hole in the substrate. The sensors consist of a sensor module, measuring element in this module and the membrane (Xian et al, 2010), (Semancik & Cavicchi, 1998).

Page 4: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Design and simulation of MEMS

The main purpose of CAD is to allow creation of a prototype, which at the first real production could have defined characteristics, appearance, behavior, work and physical endurance (Beeby et al, 2004). The list of leading software companies in the last year that support products for engineering applications include great names as Coventor Inc., COMSOL, SoftMEMS, ANSYS and so on. Particular sensor was designed with “CoventorWare2010” that has free access for students in ECAD laboratory in Technical University of Sofia.

Page 5: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

PZR pressure sensor design with the MultiMEMS Process in CoventorWare2010

The presented 3-D model of Piezoresistive (PZR) sensor was designed by using “CoventorWare2010” (Kolev et al, 2010). in a tutorial practical course lead by Europractice. The approach is combination of diaphragm FEM analysis using Analyzer and PZR modeling using Architect. The sensor is based on thin silicon diaphragm bending measurement. Substrate is Silicon <100>, epitaxial grown (EPI silicon diaphragm at 3.1µ thick), followed by anisotropic material wet etching process (399.1 µ) and mask offset of 15 microns.

Page 6: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

To create diaphragm layout proper coordinates were set in the worksheet to form the membrane dimensions. External configuration defines overall dimensions of the sensor: 1200 microns in the X and Y directions. Internal configuration defines dimensions of the etch hole: it is 990 microns in the X and Y directions (including offset).

Page 7: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Generated Solid Mesh Model of the membrane extracted from CoventorWare - top and bottom view

It is automatic by import the 2-D layout mask information. 3-D model has to be meshed with the mapped mesh. Partition coordinates are the same and form bottom and frame parts. Device’s bed is fixed and the diaphragm is movable (pressure goes in).

Page 8: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

2-D model (on the left) and 3D model (on the right) of PZR membrane

Model is under simulation that is presented in five deformation stages when pressure is applied. MemMesh undergo simulation, which calculates the diaphragm deformation under a varying pressure load. The MemMech results are automatically stored in the CoventorWare database. They can be visualized by either using the 3D Visualizer or accessing them directly in Architect.

Page 9: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

MEMS Element transforms input pressure/Fp,in/ into output electrical signals as it is shown on the model in the next figure.

These outputs have an added useful value compared to their input. The electrical signals flow at the output of the MEMS, in its turn, can be divided into a flow of qualified signals /Fs,q/ and a flow of disqualified signals, waste and emissions /Fs,d/:

Page 10: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Microelectromecanical System macro model

Page 11: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

After a lot of transformations in (de Ron & Rooda, 2001) under some conclusions and approximations the following universal measure for the technical performance is achieved:

where ηT is transformation factor, representing the ratio between the average quantity of qualified signal, obtained during the considered period T and the maximum quantity of qualified signal, that could be provided in an ideal situation during the same period; Fs,qm is the maximum output flow of qualified signal which can be achieved by the actual MEMS;

Page 12: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Interfering and/or confusing factors are those factors that reflect on the transformation process i.e. effectiveness of the MEMS which is defined by the ratio of the average real output flow of qualified signal and the average maximum output flow of qualified signal :

is the ratio between the average effective service period and the considered period. Feedback reflects on the final conclusion about the service performance.

Page 13: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

Conclusions

Following the analysis and testing procedures general conclusion is provided for improving the G-Cloud Services performance and preventing any further problems to occur. It focuses on security utilization, increase of the signal transformation factor, reliability, quality and effectiveness. Several measures should be taken to improve the MEMS performance. Focal point of overall research and development of the future generation sensors and MEMS devices should go on and open a prospect to achieve high level of safeness in general and public security.

Page 14: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

References:

Beeby, S., & Ensell, G., & Kraft, M., & White, N. (2004). MEMS Mechanical Sensors. ISBN 1-58053-536-4, Artech House, Inc.

Kolev, G., & Denishev, K., & Bobeva, S. (2010). Design and Analyzing of Silicon Diaphragm for MEMS Pressure Sensors. Annual Journal of Electronics, Sofia 2010, Volume 4, Number 2, ISSN 1313-1842, p. 112.

de Ron, A. J., & Rooda, J.E. (2001). Structuring performance measures. 1st IFIP Seminar on performance measures, Glasgow, United Kingdom, 2001, pp.25-31

Sanchez, J., & Schmitt, A., & Berger, F., & Mavon, C. (2010). Silicon-micromachined gas chromatographic columns for the development of portable detection device. J. Sens., doi:10.1155/2010/409687.

Semancik, S., & Cavicchi, R. E. (1998). Kinetically-Controlled Chemical Sensing Using Micromachined Structures. Chemical Science and Technology Laboratory, NIST, Gaithersburg, MD.

Xian, Y., & Lai, J., & Liang, H. (2010). Fabrication of a MEMS micro-hotplate. Journal of Physics: Conference Series 276, 012098, doi:10.1088/1742-6596/276/1/012098.

Page 15: Performance Measurement of MEMS Elements

About the Authors

Silvia Bobeva

PhD student in “Microelecreonics” at Technical University of Sofia (TU-Sofia). Her study is concentrated on research, design and simulation of MEMS elements and devices for automotive industry applications that aim to achieve more secure and safe eco life on the planet. The PhD study is focused on hydrogen leak detection through sensor usage in eco and hybrid vehicles. She has several publications in this field and she has conducted a lot of laboratory experiments and tutorials on “Automated Systems for Data Processing and Management” with leading tutor the second author Assoc. Prof. Dr. Roumiana Ilieva.

Roumiana Ilieva

Associate Professor on “Automated Systems for Data Processing and Management” at the Technical University of Sofia (TU-Sofia). She received an MSc in Engineering from the TU-Sofia, then a MA in Economics from the University of Delaware, USA. Her PhD is in Techniques on Dissertation: “Problems of Methodology in the Investigation of FMS Productivity”. She specializes and teaches in the field of eGovernment at the Universities of Amsterdam and The Hague (2007), Lancaster (2008), Westminster and UCL, London (2009, 2011), Southampton Solent and Portsmouth, UK (2010), "Space Challenges" (2010-2012). Her major areas of research and teaching are G-Cloud Performance Measurement, eGovernance ontologies, eServices virtual prototyping and simulation modeling, etc. She is author of over 70 scientific publications; member of IEEE: Computer Society; Robotics and Automation Society; Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Society; UDBC at USAID; Union of Automation and Informatics (UAI); PC member of JeDEM and CeDEM11 etc.