performance of enercon wind turbines under icing ...windren.se/ww2014/14_02_035_performance of...

16
Performance of Enercon wind turbines under icing conditions in Europe Winterwind 2014 - Sundsvall February 12, 2014 René Cattin, Meteotest Silke Dierer, Rebecca Gugerli, Markus Müller, Sara Koller

Upload: nguyentuyen

Post on 30-Aug-2018

230 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Performance of Enercon wind turbines

under icing conditions in Europe

Winterwind 2014 - Sundsvall

February 12, 2014

René Cattin, Meteotest

Silke Dierer, Rebecca Gugerli, Markus Müller, Sara Koller

The roles

• Wind turbine manufacturer

• Provider of hot air blade

heating

• Independant consultant

• Hired by ENERCON to assess

performance of wind turbines

under icing conditions

The sites

Dragaliden (SWE)

ENERCON E-82 (HH: 108m)

SVEVIND AB

Molau (GER)

ENERCON E-82 (HH: 138m)

Mdp GmbH

Kristofovy Hamry (CZ)

ENERCON E-82 (HH: 78m)

eab new energy GmbH

Data set from January 1 to April 30, 2013

Icing Conditions

Ice growth

Ice persistence

Icing Conditions (camera)

Very different sites

Heated versus unheated WEC

3% 20%

Heated versus unheated WEC

3%

30%

Heated versus unheated WEC

0.3% 14%

Significantly increased

production in all cases

Performance versus ice loads

light

light to moderate

moderate

moderate to heavy

heavy

5 ice load classes

Titel der Präsentation | Seite 10 | 13.02.2014

Ice loads

Titel der Präsentation | Seite 11 | 13.02.2014

Performance footprint I

Performance footprint II

Performance footprint III

One strong icing event

during 10 h

Kristofovy Hamry (heated)

70% of cases

Wrap up

The blade heating significantly increases the production in all cases

Performance strongly dependant on site conditions (ice load/intensity)

Limits: Less good performance during:

- icing events with high ice loads

- icing events with high icing intensity (ice growth)

These situations are not very frequent

Blade heating control during strong icing events can be optimized

Icing conditions need to be known in detail (ice load/intensity)

It is a case study with 4 months of data! study will continue

Input to panel discussion

More field data of real wind turbines is required to generate a

performance footprint of a specific wind turbine type under icing

conditions

Homework for manufacturers (operators)

Much more detailed site-specific icing information required to be

able to receive a performance guarantee for a de-icing system

Homework for project developers

Thank you for your attention!

Meteotest

Fabrikstrasse 14

CH-3012 Bern

www.meteotest.ch

[email protected]