P R E PA R I N G F O R A C O M P L I A N C E R E V I E W

PERKINS COMPLIANCE

Monieca WestADHE Federal Program ManagerOctober 19, 2012

COMPLIANCE REVIEWS

Annual Compliance

• Annual• Routine• Focus• Program• Fiscal• Accountability

Supplemental Monitoring

• As needed• Need based on risk• Risk determined by points• Grant size• Coordinator tenure• Unused funds• Reimbursement patterns• Programmatic deadlines• Amendment patterns• Improvement plan status• Other compliance areas

ADHE AUTHORITY

PERKINS SEC. 122. STATE PLAN.• (c) Plan Contents- The State plan shall include

information that--• (11) provides assurances that the eligible agency will

comply with the requirements of this Act and the provisions of the State plan, including the provision of a financial audit of funds received under this Act which may be included as part of an audit of other Federal or State programs

STATE PLAN• Annual on-site compliance/technical assistance• Risk management plan

FINANCIAL GOVERNANCE AUTHORITIES

• The Carl D. Perkins CTE Act of 2006• EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative

Regulations) • OMB Circulars (Office of Management and Budget)• A-87—Cost Principles for State and Local Governments• A-21—Cost Principles for Postsecondary Educational

Institutions• Arkansas Perkins State Plan for Career and Technical

Education• Arkansas Department of Higher Education Policy

Defaults to the most restrictive

COMPLIANCE REVIEW CHECKLIST

WWW.ADHEPERKINS.COM/FORMS.HTML

WWW.ADHEPERKINS.COM

REVIEW ELEMENTS

• I. Program Review• II. Fiscal Review• III. Accountability/Program Improvement

Review• IV. Other Information/Technical Assistance• V. Activities Review• VI. Summary/Exit Interview

I. PROGRAM REVIEW

• Personnel interviewed: • Review how Perkins supports or is integrated into institution’s CTE

improvement activities, including institutions requirement for addressing Required Use of Funds.

• Review how activities are selected for Perkins funding.• Review how data is used to determining activity selection and clearly

defining CTE goals.• Review how special populations and nontraditional students are

supported.• Review how institution links with secondary programs for seamless

transition from high school to college.• Review how professional development is funded and targeted.• Review how institution assesses effectiveness of Perkins funded activities.• Review consortia issues or concerns, if appropriate.• Verify current AA page.• Verify current PoS documentation.• Review organization and management of Perkins programs and records.

II. FISCAL REVIEW

• Personnel interviewed: • Review financial management system as related to Perkins, including

quarterly reconciliation.• Review PARs on file for Perkins funded positions.• Review documentation of admin funds, including Indirect Cost Rate

Letter, if appropriate.• Review Perkins inventory management system and physical check of

selected items.• Review selected expenditures (Annual Plan approval through Request

for Reimbursement).• Review Supplemental Review areas of concern.

___ Unused Funds ___Late reports ___Results ___Amendments ___Tenure

III. ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEW

• Personnel interviewed: • Review collection and reporting of Special Populations information.• Review collection and reporting of Technical Skills Assessment results.• Review how Perkins performance results are used on campus.• Review historical results and future year targets.• Review progress on Improvement Plans, if appropriate.

IV. OTHER/TECH ASSISTANCE

• Areas for future technical assistance• Questions/Concerns• Perkins going forward

V. ACTIVITIES REVIEW

• Review progress to date (interview person responsible for implementing activity)

• Review assessment method tracking• Review End of Year Program Report from previous year, including

professional development impact

VI. SUMMARY/EXIT INTERVIEW

• Review progress to date (interview person responsible for implementing activity)

• Review assessment method tracking• Review End of Year Program Report from previous year, including

professional development impact• Perkins reauthorization update.

POST REVIEW

• Compliance review summary drafted.• If there are findings, coordinator is given a chance

to review.• Report uploaded to Portal and coordinator

notified.• Written Compliance Review Report provided to

president/chancellor.

PREPARING FOR VISIT

• Review the checklist and anticipate the discussions.

• Have appropriate staff available.• Perkins Team representation• Business office• Lead person for each funded activity

• Have Perkins documents available.• Financial documents• Inventory records and access arranged• PARs• Program of Study documentation• Indirect cost rate letter• Improvement plan progress

M O N I E C A. W E S T @ A D H E . E D U B R I N DA. B E R RY @ A D H E . E D U

QUESTIONS