personal computer industry final version

44
PERSONAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY Claire Schnitzius Thanh Vo Mustafa Shah Tuan Hoang GROUP 17

Upload: mustafash79

Post on 22-Nov-2014

14.813 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Analysis of the Personal Computer Industry involving four major competitors.

TRANSCRIPT

  • 1. PERSONAL COMPUTER INDUSTRY Claire Schnitzius Thanh Vo Mustafa Shah Tuan Hoang GROUP 17
  • 2. INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
    • Saturated, increasingly narrow profit margins
    • Source of competition is price and company reputation
    • Average net profit margin in the industry is 7.3%
    • Average debt to equity ratio is .4
    DUDE YOUR GETTING A DELL
  • 3. THE COMPANIES
    • We chose to analyze Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Apple, and Palm.
  • 4. BUSINESS STRATEGY
    • Palm strategy To become a leader in mobile computing, with emphasis on hand-held products
    • HP strategy To make doing business with customers easier; transforming industry is an opportunity to grow
    • Dell-Combining direct customer model with highly efficient manufacturing and supply chain management organization
    • Apple- To bring its customers around the world compelling new products and solutions with ease-of-use, seamless integration, and innovative industrial design
  • 5. PROFITABILITY
    • ROA explains how effectively companies convert money they have to invest into net income
    • ROA can be misleading when analyzing technology companies because people and technologies dont appear as assets for the company, since R&D must be expensed
    • R&D is essential to technologically innovative firms
  • 6. PROFITABILITY RATIOS
    • Profitability Ratios include:
      • Profit margin for return on assets
      • Total asset turnover
      • Return on assets
      • Profit margin for return on common equity
      • Total asset turnover
      • Capital structure leverage, and
      • Return on common equity
  • 7. PROFIT MARGIN FOR ROA 10.3 9.5 3.2 Apple 23.3 6.2 .8 Palm 6.9 4.8 4.7 HP 6.4 6.2 6.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 8.
  • 9. ASSET TURNOVER FOR ROA 1.3 1.9 5.6 Apple 1.6 1.5 1.5 Palm 1.2 1.1 2.1 HP 2.4 2.3 2.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 10.
  • 11. RETURN ON ASSETS 13.9 18.3 17.9 Apple 37.0 9.5 1.2 Palm 8.0 5.5 9.8 HP 15.5 14.4 15.3 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 12.
  • 13. PROFIT MARGIN FOR ROCE 10.3 9.5 3.2 Apple 23.3 6.2 .8 Palm 6.9 4.8 4.7 HP 6.4 6.2 6.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 14.
  • 15. ASSET TURNOVER FOR ROCE 1.3 1.9 5.6 Apple 1.6 1.5 1.5 Palm 1.2 1.1 2.1 HP 2.4 2.3 2.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 16.
  • 17. CAPITAL STRUCTURE LEVERAGE 1.6 2.0 1.8 Apple 1.3 1.6 1.7 Palm 2.1 2.1 2.0 HP 4.4 3.3 3.1 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 18.
  • 19. RETURN ON COMMON EQUITY 22.8 35.8 30.4 Apple 46.9 14.7 2.1 Palm 16.9 11.2 19.9 HP 67.5 47.8 47.5 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 20.
  • 21. SG&A EXPENSES AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET INCOME 16.3 17.2 23.1 Apple 15.8 16.6 19.9 Palm 12.3 12.9 13.1 HP 9.2 8.7 8.6 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 22.
  • 23. R&D EXPENSES AS A PERCENTAGE OF NET INCOME 3.9 4.0 5.9 Apple 8.6 7.1 7.3 Palm 4.0 4.0 4.5 HP .8 .9 1.1 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 24.
  • 25. NET PROFIT MARGIN 9.3 8.5 3.2 Apple 21.3 5.2 -2.3 Palm 6.8 2.8 4.4 HP 6.4 6.2 6.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 26.
  • 27. REVENUE GROWTH 38.6 68.3 Apple 24.3 33.8 Palm 5.7 8.5 HP 13.6 18.7 Dell 2006 2005 %
  • 28.
  • 29. LIQUIDITY
    • Ability to convert an asset to cash quickly
    • Significant for the personal computer industry because of the variable revenues
      • Lack of consistency in earnings
  • 30. CURRENT RATIO 2.2 3.0 2.7 Apple 1.6 1.7 1.6 Palm 1.4 1.4 1.5 HP 1.1 1.2 .98 Dell 2006 2005 2004
  • 31.
  • 32. QUICK RATIO 1.7 2.6 2.0 Apple 1.5 1.6 1.4 Palm 1.1 1.1 1.2 HP .9 1.1 .8 Dell 2006 2005 2004
  • 33.
  • 34. SOLVENCY
    • Ability of an entity to pay its debts with available cash
    • Trend in the industry is to use equity financing instead of heavy debt financing
  • 35. TOTAL LIABILITIES TO TOTAL ASSETS 42.0 35.5 85.8 Apple 8.3 36.4 34.7 Palm 53.5 51.9 50.7 HP 82.1 72.0 67.4 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 36.
  • 37. LONG TERM DEBT TO SHAREHOLDER EQUITY 7.5 8.1 6.7 Apple 9.1 57.3 53.2 Palm 6.5 9.1 12.3 HP 12.2 7.8 8.0 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 38.
  • 39. OPERATING CASH FLOW TO TOTAL LIABILITIES 39.3 72.7 36.3 Apple 65.0 38.0 -4.8 Palm 27.0 20.4 26.4 HP 27.1 35.7 31.1 Dell 2006 2005 2004 %
  • 40.
  • 41. RISK
    • Competition levels of industry make profit margin predictability difficult
    • Customer demand and desire for innovation could affect revenue and profit margin
      • Innovation must be maintained
    • Also have to maintain and enforce intellectual property rights and be aware of infringing upon intellectual property
    • Revenues and profitability fluctuate dramatically overtime, which makes forecasting extremely difficult
    • Analysis of the industry is not an easy task, but following traditional analysis methods is one option
  • 42. RISK
    • Cisco was suing Apple and Steve Jobs for trademark infringement over the iPhone name
    • Dell filed form 12b-25 with the SEC, which is a notification of late filing of the annual report
    • Exploding batteries in Dell notebooks was another major issue
    • HP settled civil charges over a corporate spying scandal with the California State Attorney Generals Office
  • 43. Z-SCORE AND BANKRUPTCY PROBABILITY 2.68 .37% 2.91 .18% 3.37 .04% Apple 1.5 6.2% .7 23.4% 3.7 .01% Palm 2.0 2.6% 1.7 3.9% 1.8 4.0% HP 5.9 .03% 7.1 .03% 7.2 .03% Dell 2006 2005 2004
  • 44. CONCLUSION
    • Sustainability of the industry is assured
    • Success of an individual company depends a lot on its ability to meet customer demand:
      • Innovation
      • Reliability
      • Quality
      • Affordability
    • Struggle with the balance between profits and maintaining customers
    • Companies in a niche market have a high probability of being bought out by industry leaders