persons syllabus 2.pdf
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
1/19
Course Svllabus
n
Persons Family Relations
Persons and
Family Relations is a
4)
four unit course and a bar subject, covering
the
ff.:
I Preliminary titles
of he
Civil Code Articles 1-5 1)
2. Family Code and supplementary laws on marriage, children and the family, as amended
3. Funerals
Art.
305-3 1
0),
care
and Education
of
Children Art.
356
-363),
Use
of
Surnames Art.
364 - 380, as
amended by RA No.
9048), Absence
Art.
381-389), Preswnption
ofDeath Art.
390-
396), Civil Register Art. 407- 413) all under the Civil Code oftb.e Philippines and Summary
Judicial Provisions
Mid-teem
examination-August 14,
2012
Final Examination -
References:
I
New
Civil Code
of
he Philippines NCC), Articles 1-51; Articles
254
-257; 305-310;
356-396;
407-413 Republic Act No.
386)
2. A. Tolentino, Civil Code of the Philippines-Commentaries and Jurisprudence
3.
Alicia
Sempio-Dy,
Handbook
on
the
Family
Code of
the
Philippines Cases and
Comments)
4. Family
Code
of the Philippines Executive Order 209) as
amended by
E.O No. 227
5. Paras, Civil Codeof the Philippines
6.
Quick
Reviewer on
Law
on
Marriage and
F
amily
Relations
Other References:
Executive Order
No.
200,
amending
Article 2 of
he
Civil Code
Maniage
Law
Act 3613)
Civil
Registry
Law
Act
No.
3753)
Domestic
Adoption Actof 1998 R.A.
No. 8552)
Inter-Country Adoption Act of
1995
Republic Act
No.8043)
Supreme Court Rule on Adoption A.M. No. 02-6-02-SC)
Supreme
Court
Rule on
Custody
ofMinors and Writ
of
Habeas Corpus in
relation to Custody
of
Minors A.M. No.
03-04-
04
SC)
4w.. 6 ~ . ~
H. ~ h t Ci/.y
/
_ _ : . ~ r < f
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
2/19
R.A.
9225,
Dual
Citizenship
Law
,
2003
Phillipinc Passport Act Republic Act
8239)
Child
Youth
and
Welfare
Code P.O. 603)
Code of
Muslim
Personal
Laws
P.O. I 083)
C
onvention
on the Elimination
of
All
forms
of
Discrimination against
Women CEDA
W)
R.A
. 9139, Administrative Naturalization Law,
2000
See Section
12;
Women in Nation
Building Act of
1992,
Republic
Act No.7192,
Sections
5-8;
Cesar S. Sangco, Chapter IX
Special
Torts Human Relations) , Philippine
Law
on Torts and
Damages, JMC
Press, 1978, 363-420
R.A.
8171
1995
)
R.
A.
9139
, Administrative Naturalization
l w
, 2000 SeeSection
12
Presidential
Decree
965, 1976)
Presidential
Decree 1083, Muslim Code
of
Personal Laws
R. A. 9262,
Anti-Violence Against
Women
and
Chi
l
dren
Act of
2004
Supreme Court A.
M.
NO. 02-1 1
-10-SC
,
March
4, 2003Rule on Declaration of Absolute Nulity o
Void
Marriages
and Annulment of
Voidable Marriages
Supreme
Court Rules on Legal Separation.
A.
M.
NO.
02-11-11-Supreme Cowt,
March
15
,
2003
SC Rules on the
legal Guardianship of
Minors
.
A.M
. NO. 03-02-05-Supreme Court,
May
I,
2003
SC Rule on Provisional Orders A.M. No. 02-11-12-SC)
Supreme
Court AM
.
No.
6-
11-15,
2 October 2007.
Rule
s on
DNA Evidence
Rule on Declaration ofNullity
of
Void Marriages and Voidable Marriages, A.M .. No. 02-11-10-
SC 2003-03-04
Republic
Act 9262
, Anti-Violence Against
Women
nnd
Children
Act
of
2004
R. A.
9255
, 2002) An act allowing illegitimate children to
use
the
surname
of
heir father,
amending for
the purpose, Art.
176
oftbe
Family
C
ode Note: read also
its implementing
guidelines
in Adm
. Order
No
I.
Serie
s of
2004
2
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
3/19
RA
6809- an act lowering the age of majority to 18 years. amending
Art.
234 and repealing
Articles 235 and 237
of
the Civil Code)
R.
A.
9048 amending
Art..
376
of
the Civil Code)
MAJOR PARTS:
I. Course Overview and Introduction
to
the Civil Code and Preliminary Title Articles 1 5 I
2. Introduction to the Family Code
3.
General Provisions: Persons, Civil Personality Citizenship and Domicile
4. Formal and Essential Requisites ofManiage
5. Rights Obligations Between Husbands Wives
6.
Void Voidable Maniages and Legal Separation
_7. Support, Parental Authority, Emancipation and ge ofMajority
8. Paternity and Filiation, Adoption,
9. Funerals
Art.
305-310), care and Educat.on ofChildren Art. 356-363), Use
of
Surnames
Art.
364 - 380, as amended by R.A. No. 9048), Absence
{Art.
381
-389), Presumption
of
Death Art.
390- 396), Civil Register
Art.
407- 413) all under the Civil Code
of
the Philippines and Summary
Judicial Provisions
Criteria for passing:
Class attendance
5 )
; Graded Recitation
and
auizz.es (35
)
;
Mid
Term Examination
(20 ) ; Final Exams(30
)
. Students who miss a quiz shall gel
an
automatic
5. No
make-yp
quizzes
and
exams will
he
given_
COURSE OVERVIEW
fJ .:U: Course Overview and Introduction to the Civil Code and Preliminary Title
a) The Concept
of
Civil Law, Influences
of
Philippine Civil Law
b) The Effect and Application ofLaws
Art.
l-18, New Civil Code)
c) Human Relations {Art..l9-36, NCC)
fm:ll:
Introduction to the Family Code
3
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
4/19
a) Family and Marriage Laws the concept o amily
b) The Statuso Women and Equality
in
Marriage and the Family: CEDAW, Art.l6
Part 3: Persons, Civil Personality Citizenship
and
Domicile
a) Persons, Civil Personality, Natural Juridical
Persons
b) Citizenship Domicile
Part
4:
Marriage, Formal
and
Essential Requisites
a) Marriage, Definition
b)
Formal
and
Essential Requisites o
Marriage
c) Valid Marriage License and Marriage Ceremony
Part 5:
Rights
Obligations between Husbands
and
Wives
a) Obligations between the Husband and
Wife
b) Property Relations and Family Home
b.l)
Marriage
Settlements, Donations
by reason
o
marriage
b.2) Absolute Community Conjugal Partnership
b.3) Separation o Property
and Property
Relations o Unions
without Marriage
b.4) The Family
Home
Part 6:
Void
Voidable Marriages and
Legal
Separation
a) Lack o Essential
and
Formal Requisites
b) Psychological Incapacity
c)
Incestuous Marriages and Marriages Void
for
reasons
o Public
Policy; Presumptive
Death
d) Deficiency
in
Consent; Prohibition on Collusion
e)
Legal
Separation
Part 7: The Family/Family Relations; Support,
Parental
Authority, Emancipation
and Age
o
Majority
a) The Family Family Relations
4
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
5/19
b) Support, Definition, Persons
who
are Entitled
to
Support
c)
Amount
of
support, Liability, Fulfillment; Non-Levy
of
Support
d) Support Pendente Lite; Reimbursement
and
Contractual Support
e)
Parental Authority, Deftnition and Character
of
Responsibility; Rights
and
Duties
f)
Civil
Liability for Damages ; Property
of
a child
g)
Loss
of
Parental Authority
and
Substitute Parental Authority; Special Authority; Disciplinary
Measures
h)
Emancipation
Part
8:
Paternity and Filiation, Adoption, Sununary Judicial Provisions
a) Concept
of
Legitimacy:
Legitimated Children; Extension
of
Legiti
macy by
Legal Fiction
and
Adopted Children
b) Action
to Claim Legitimacy
c) Adoption
d) Swnmary Judicial Proceedings
Part 9: Review
of
Key Provisions
TOPICS/CASES
Part 1: Course Overview and Introduction to the Civil Code and Preliminary Title
I)
The Concept ofCi
vil
Law, Influences ofPhilippineCivil Law, Tolentino pp.
l-
10
In re: Max Sltoop 43 Plti/213 1920)
2) The Effect
and
Application
of
Laws
Art.
1-18, NCC), Tolentino,
pp.
11-58
a)
Date
of
Effectivity Art. 2, NCC
b) Executive
Order No .
200
, June
18, 1987
Tanada v Tuvera,
U6 SCRA
446 (GR 63915 29 December 1986)
Pltilippine Association ofService Exporters v Hon Ruben To es et.aL, GR 10279 6 August 1992
a.
Laws and Ru les covered by the Ru le on Publication
Tayug Rural Ba11k v CB, GR 46158, November28, 1986
5
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
6/19
b. Computation ofTime,
Art
13, NCC
Firestone Tire
and
Rubber Co v Lariosa
and NLRC
L-70479 February
27
1987
Gonzaga v de David L-14858 December 29 1960
Rural
Btmk v Court
o
Appeals L-12116 Apri/21 1981
c.
Meaning
of
Weeks
and Months
Art.l
3, NCC
People v del Rosario L-7214 May 21 1955
(b) Principles on the Application
of
laws
a.
Presumption ofKnowtedge of he Law, Art . 3, NCC In
Re: Filar/40
Phil
205
b. Prospective Retroactive Effect
ofLaws
, Art.
4 NCC
ABS-CBN v Court
o
Tax Appeals L-51106 October I 1 1981
LoreiiZD
v
PDsadas
64 Phil
JSJ
c. Mandatory and Directory LawsArt. 5, NCC
d. Waiver
of
Rights and Exceptions Art 6, NCC
Fe atini v Gsell
34 Phii69J
e. Equity in
the
Application
of
Law An
I0, NCC
f.
Repeal of Laws Art 7, NCC
Lichauco vApDSID/44 Phi/138
and U S
v Palacio
JJ Phi/208
e)
Jurisprudence .
Duty
of the
Courts to Decide Art 8-9
l o r t t a ~ v
Plli ltx Minin CR 30642 April30 1985
(d) Customs contra.ry to public order
.
proofArt . 9, 11-12, NCC
(e) Application
of
Laws
a. Application
of
Penal laws, and
lawson
Public Security and Safety Art.l4,
NCC
b. Application of
laws
on Fami ly Rights and Duties; Status Condition and Legal Capacity of
Persons Art.
IS
,
NCC
c.law
on
Property Art. 16, NCC
d. Forms, Solemnities ofContracts and Wills Art. 17, NCC
(f) Suppletory Effect
of
the Civil Code Art. IS , NCC
(3) Human Relations (Art.l9-36, NCC), Tolentino, pp. 59-152
6
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
7/19
Reference: Cesar S. Sangco, Chapter IX, Special Torts (Human Relations), Philippine
Law
on
Torts and Damages, JMC Press,
1978
, 363-420
Part 2: Introduction to the Family Code
(4)
Laws
on the Family and Marriage : Overview the concept of"Family"
Tolentino, pp.217-218 and Sempio-Diy, Introduction Reasons for
the
Enacttnent of
the
Family Code)
Sec.
12, Al1 II;
Sec. , Art XV,
1987
Constitution
Art.l49-150, Fam ily Code
Rommel Jacinto Dantes Silverio
R ~ p u b l i c
G.R. No. 174689, 11 October
1 7
(Obiter Dictum on
Petitioner s desire to marry r ~ r flancie}
(5) Women's Status and Equality in Marriage and the Family : CEDAW,
An l6
Part 3: Persons. Civil Personality Citizenship and Domicile
(6)
Persons, Civil Personality, Natural Juridical Persons Tolentino, pp. 156-186
(a) Capacity (Juridical Capacity Capacity to Act), Al1.
37,
NCC
(b) Incapacity (Causes Consequences), Art.3839, NCC; Women in Nation Building Act of
1992, Republic Act No.7 I92 , Sections 5-8
(c) Natural Persons Art.40-42, NCC; Survivorship Al143, N
CC
(d) Juridical Persons Art.44-46, NCC
(7) Citizenship Domicile Tolentino, pp.l87-214
1973 1987
Constitution on Citizenship; Article 4, Sec. 1-5
1987
Constitution
Article 2, Sec.
14
, 1987 Constitution
Republic Act 817 I (I 995)
Republic Act 9139, Administrative Naturalization Law, 2000 see Section
12
Republic Act
9225
, Dual Citizenship Law, 2003
Political and Public Life (Article
7),
Nationality, (Article 9) CEDAW
General Recommendation No. 23 (1997); General Recommendation No. 21,9-10
CEDAW
7
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
8/19
Suggested additional Readings:
Issues in Citizenship, Equality and Non-DiscriminationReview, Discrimination, Article I)
CEDAW
Von Dorn v Romillo, 139 SCRA 139
Pilapil v 1boy-Somera, 174 SCRA 653
Part 4: Marriage, Fonnal
and
Essential Requisites
8)
Marriage, Definition Article I, Chapter I, FC Breach
of
Promise to Marry
Hermosisima v CA, et.ol. 109 Phil 628
and
Wassmer v Velez 12 SCRA 652
Nature ofContract Ty v Court ofAppeals, G.R. 127406, November 27, 2000
Requisites
ofMarriage, Chapter
I
Articles 1-26; Article
149
-
15
1,
FC
The Family, Article n Sec. 12; Article
XV,
Sec.l-4, 1987 Conslin.tion
Article
II
, Sec. 14; Article Xlll, Sec.14, 1987 Constitution
Unions without the BenefitofMarriage, Article 147-148, FC
Requisites
of
Marriage : Formal and Essential Requisites
Nina/ vs Bayadog, 238 SCRA 122
Eugenio v
J
Velez, G.R. 85140 May 17, 1990
Navarro v Domogtoy 259 SCRA 129
and
Pugeda v Trias 4
SCRA 49
People vBorromeo 133 SCRA 106 and Martiatequi v CA 205 SCRA
337
Tenebro vC4 GR 150158, Februqry 18, 2004
and
RP v Dayot GR 15581, 28 March
2008 false affidavit)
Cariiio v Cariiio, G.R. 102569, 2 February 2001 and Republic v C.A. and
Castro 36 SCRA
Loria
vs
Felix, 104
Phi
1
and
Trinidads. C4, 289 SCRA 188
Republic
vs
C4, 268
SCRA
198 and Marcos
vs
Marcos, 343 SCRA 755
Marriages Solemnized Outside the Philippines Article 26,
FC
8
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
9/19
Republic
lyoy
GR
152577 21
Septembtr
2005
Republic v Orbecido 11/ GR I 54380 5 October 2005
Llorente v
C
and Lorente
GR
124371 November 23, 2000
VanDorn v Romil/o Foreign Divorce Decree)
Pilapil lbay-Somera
Republic v
CA.
and Castro Re: Secret Marriage)
(II)Rights and Obligations Between Husbands and Wi
ves
, Title Ill
Lacson v Lacson 24 SCRA 837
and
Arroyo v
Vasq11ez
de Arroyo 42 Pltil 54
Exception
to
Living together in relation
to
Fixing Domicile, Article 69 see
pw:.
(2)
Giota
11
Campos Rueda
35
Phi/252
Refer to: Republic Act 926
2
Anti-Violence Against
Women
and Children Act of2004
b. Joint Support, Management of the Household,
Reli
ef for Neglect
of
Duty, Articles 7072, FC
Arroyo v Vasquet de Arroyo 42 Phil page 54
(i) E:mcise
of
Profession, Article 73 , FC and Scmpio-Oy , pp. 130-133
(ii) Support, Title VlU , Article 194-195,
FC
When Available
Quimiguing v lcao 34
SCRA
132 and BarnueWJ v Fuster 29 Pllil606
Marcelo v Estacio 7 PhilUS and Cononitado v AlmedaLopez 109 Phil/ 169
Jocso11 v Empire l115urance Co. 103 Phil580
Characteristics
of
Support:
by
Sempio-Dy pp.331-332 case: Samson v Yatco 1 SCRA IUS
(iii) Joint Parental Authority, Article 208-2
15
FC
Leoue/ Santos and Rosario Bedia Santos v
Ct
241 SCRA 407 and Flores v sulxlfl 97 Phil 439
On Code Commission s Rationale for Husband s Decision, Article 21
1
FC Sempio-Dy. pp.
353354
in relation to: Article I02 (6);
129
(9); Presumption in favour
of
he Mother in Custody Cases when
Child is aged below seven
Unfit Parent,
Art
. 229 (5) FC; 23 1(Tennination Suspension)
9
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
10/19
Petilionfor Habeas CorpusofAngelle Anne Cervantes 169 SCRA 575
Leouel Santos and Rosario Bedia Somas vCA
Discrimination, (Article 1 ; Marriage and Family Life, (Article 16) CEDAW;
General Recommendation No. 21, 7-8 on (Art. 15);
10
(h) on Art. 16 ; 19-20, also in relation to
Article 16, CEDAW
(12) The Family Home Property Relations- Mnrriage Settlements, Donations
(i) Applicable Property Regime, Articles 74-81. FC Quilllana v Lerma 4Phil 285
General Recommendation No. 21 , 25-29, Right to property; 30-33, Right to Marital property; 34-
3
5, Inheritance
Marriage Settlements (Pre-nuptial Agreements). Validity, Article 75-77, FC
(ii) Donations
by
Reason
o
Marriage, Art.82-87
Hardling v Commercial Union Ass. Co 38 Phi/46 1
Matabuena v Cervantes 38 SCRA U
(b) Absolute Community Conjugal Partnership
I.
hat
Constitutes Community Property, Article 91; When Constituted,
Article 88; Presumption o Inclusion, Article 93; Co-Ownership, Article 90;
Non-waiver Article 89, FC
Dt Leon RFC
36
SCRA 289 and Ahern v Julian 39 Phi/607
Jocson vJocson Vasquez 170SCRA 333 and Sideco vAznar 92 Phi/951
2.
Excluded
from
Absolute Community, Article 92, FC Sempio-Dy, pp. 159-161
3.
Charges upon the ACP, Articles 94-95,
FC
Sempio-Dy,
pp.
163-169
4.
Ownership, Administrative, Enjoyment and Disposition
o
the Community Property,
Article
96-98
Sempio-Dy
pp.
169-174
On Code Commission s Rationale for Preference over Husband s Administrative and
Management Sempio-Dy, Alicia(l988). pp.
170-171
10
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
11/19
5
Dissolution
of
the Absolute Community
of
Property, Article 99,
FCa..
Effect
of De
facto
Separation
and Abandonment Article 100- 101 ,
FC
b. Liquidation of the ACP, Articles 102-103, FC
Onas v Javillo 59 Phil
711
a11d De Ocampo v Delizo 69 SCRA 216
ii.Conjuga.l Partnership Property -
I.
What Constitutes CPP, Article
I
06
I
08
,
When constituted,
Article
105;
Non-waiver, Article
107 in
relation
to
Article 88 89,
FC
De Ansa/do vSheriff
of
Manila 64 Pili/ 156
Philippine National Bank v Qunitos 46 Phil 170 and Noble Jose v Noble Jose
41
Phil
7 3
2.
Coverage, Conjugal Partnership Property, Article 166-120 FC
Jove/Janos vC4
210SCRA
126 and Zulueta vPan-AmAirways 49SCRA 1
3.
Exc luded Property, Article 109-115,
FC
Rodriguez v De La Cruz 8 Pili/ 665
Santos v Bartolome 44 Phil 76 and Tecson v
SSS
3 SCRA 715
Lorenzo v Nicolas
91
Phil 686 and Gonzalesv Miller 69 Phil340
People s Bank v Register o fDeeds 60Phi 167 and Perer v Perez 109 Phil64
4. Charges upon
th
CPP, Articles 121-123, FC Sempio-Dy,
pp.
210-214
5.
Administration ofthe CPP, 124-125,
FC
Sempio-Dy,
pp.21
5-216
On Code Commission
s
Rationale fi r Preference over Husbands Administrative and
Management:
Sempio-Dy, Alicia (1988).
p. 216
6.
Liquidation of theCI P, Articles 129-133, FC
Babao v Villanueva 44 Phi/921 and Moore and Sons Mercantile Co v
Wagner S
Phil
128
iii. ScparationofPropertyl. Definitio11 Article 145-146; When Constituted (Before Marriage),
Article 143; During Marriage (Grounds and Procedure), Article 134-142; Revival ofPropeny
Regime, Article 67
Partosa-Jo v
CA
18 December 1992 anti In re: Jose Bermas and Pil111 Bermas U SCRA
321
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
12/19
2. Liability of spouses to creditors, Solidary, Article 146 2),
FC
iv.
Property Relations ofUnions without Marriage, Article 147-148, FC
Tumulos v Femandez GR 13765012April2000
c) Separation
of
Property and Property Relations
of
Unions without Marriage
Carino v Carino 351 SCRA 127 and
Valdez v RTC 260 SCRA 221
gapcry
v Palang 276SCRA 341
d)
The Family Home, Art. 151-162,
FC
Manacop v CA 277SCRA 57
and
Honrado v
C 476
SCRA 280
Arriola v Arriola GR 177703, 28 January 2008 and Spouses Verso/a v C4, 497 SCRA
J S
Modequillo v Breva 185 SCRA 766 and Valdes vRTC 260 SCRA 221
Part 6: Void Voidable Marriages and Legal Separation
13)
Lack
of
Essential and Formal Requisites Void and Voidable Marriage
Lacking Essential
and
Formal Requisites, Article 35, FC
A Wiegel v Sempio-Dy 143 SCRA 499 and lmelos vRTC
GR
1 79620, 28August 2008
Odayat v Ama11te 77
SCRA
338
14) Psychological Incapacity
Psychologicallncapacity, Article 36, FC; Republic
Act
8533 1998) in relation to Article 39;
Article 54,
FC;
Supreme Court A.M.
NO
.
02 1
1-10-SC March4, 2003
Suggested
Readings:
Important cases:
Republic v Molina, G.R. 108763, February /3 1997
Benedicta vDe La Rama 3 Phi/341 L-1056, 8 December 1903) Availability
of
Divorce)
Valdes v RTC
ojQC
GR 1227493/ July 1996LeouelSantos v C and Julia o ~ a r i o Bedia
Salttos, GR 112019 4 January 1995
12
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
13/19
ChiMing Tsoi v Court o Appeals, G.R. No. 119190. Januiuy 16,
1997
Antonio v Reyes, G.R. 155800, Marc/r 10, 1006
Marcos v Marcos 343 SCRA 755
LeoniloAntonio v Marie Yvonne F Reyes, GR 155800,10 March 2006.
See also: Supreme Court
Rule
on Declaration ofNullity
of
Void Marriages
and
Voidable Marriages,
A.m. No:
02-11-10-SC 2003-03-04
{15)
Incestuous Marriages
and
Marriages Void for reasons
of
Public
Poli'cy;
Preswnptive Death
c.
Fi
n
al
Judgement,- Absolute Nullity
of
Previous Marriage,
Art.
40
Bobis v Bobis 3 July 2000 and Landiclro v Relova 22 SCRA 731
Rep v Castro
136 SCRA
257 and Domingo v CA 226SCRA 571
Rep.
v
Nolasco 210 SCRA 2 and Rep. v Bermudez. Lorino 18 January 2005
Valdes v RTC 260
SCRA
111
16)
Deficiency in Consent
Art.
45-47 FC
Prohibition on Collusion Mercado v
Mercad
o 337
SCRA
22
Deficiency
in
Consent, Article 45-47,FC
Common Provisions:
Support Pendente Lite, Presumptive Legitimes, Liquidation,
Support,
Custody
and
Partition,
Article
49-5
1,
FC
Prohibition
on Collusion, Article
48, FC
Record
of
Judgement and Partition, Effect on Subsequent Marriage, Article
52-53
, PC
17) Legal
Separation, Title
II
, FC
US v Joanino 17 Phil 477 Effects)
Laperal v Republic 6
SCRA
357 Surname)Hatima Yasin v Sharia District Court G.R.
No
94986
February 23, 1995 Muslim Divorce/
Surname);
Remo v Hon.Sec.ofthe DepartmentofForeign Affairs CA GR Sp.87710, July 24,
2004
Reverting to Maiden Name, Passport
Law)
Llorente v CA and Lorente GR 124371 November 23, 2000; Republic v Obrecido GR 1543805
October
13
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
14/19
2005 EffectofDivorce by a fonner Filipino;
Sempio-Dy:
p. 32on the application of
Art. 26 [2))
Supreme Court Rules on Legal Separation, A.M. No. 02-11-11-SC
Grounds for Legal Separation , Article 55
FC
General Recommendation No. 2 I,
40)
CEDA
W;
General Recommendation No. 12
19
,
Violence Against
Women
,
CEDA W
a. When Grounds not Available, Article 56,
PC
b.
When
to
File,
Article 57,
FC
c. Six Month Period, Rcconciliaiion and Prohibition on Collusion , Articles 58-60, FC
d. See
also: Rules on
Legal
Separation,
A.
M. NO .
02
-11-11-Supreme Coun, March 15, 2003
Exception:
Sec.
19, Republic
Act 9262, Violence against Women
and
iheir Children Act of
2004;
See also
Sec.
18 no more cooling
otT
period)
Recommended cases
for
reading: People v Genosa GR 13591 January
15 2004
Part 7: The Family Family Relations, Support, Parental Authority, Emancipationand
Age
of
Majority
18)
The
Family,
rl
.149-150,
FC;
Review: Sec.
12, Art.
I I Sec.
I
Art.15 1987, Constitution)
19)Support, Review Definition, Article 194, FC ; Who are entitled to Support each othe.r, Article
195-197,
FC
20)Amount, Article
20 I
in relation
to
195-196); Necessity
and
Means Available, Article 202, PC,
liability
for
Support in case there are two or
more
obliged, Article
I
99-200,
FC When
Den
tondable, Article 203;
Effect of Separation in Fact) Article 127, FC; How to Fulfil, Article 204, FC; Non-Levy of
Support,
Article
205
; Qualification Excess) Article 208,
FC;
Reimbursement,
Third Person providing Support.
Article 206-207, FC; Contractual Support, Article 208, FC 21) Support Pendente Lite ,
Article
198, FC
14
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
15/19
(22)Parental Aulhority, Definition, Character
of
Responsibility, Joint/ Preference for Father i.n case
ofdisagreement, Article 209 -2111; also 186 (Adoption) ; See also effect
of
adoption (l'em1ination of
Parental Authority, Parents
by
Nature, Article 189, FC)
Ex
cepti
on Illegitimate Children, Sole Parental Authority
of
h Mother, Article 176, FC
On
Code Commission's Rationale
for
Preference over Husband's Authority and Responsibi lity:
Sempio-Dy, Alici
a,
pp. 353-3
54
Discrimination, (Article l); Marriage and family life, (Article 16) CEDA
W;
Gen e
ral
Recornll endation
No
. 21 Compare
with: Articl
e I02 129, FC,
Pr
e
ference
in
fav
our of Mother,
Child a
ged beJow
seven
Espiri tu CA, G.R.
No
. 1/5640 March 15, 1995
Gua/berto v
CA
G.R.
No
. 154994.
June
28, 2005
Rights
and Duties
, Article
220
, FC
23)Civil Liability for Damages, Article 221 , FC
Child ' s
J>roperty
,
Art
icle 225-227; (Guardian Ad Litem) 222, FC
24) Loss of Parental Authority
Pennanently, Article 228; See also 234 3); 236 (Emancipation); 232 (Sexual Abuse) FC; Unfit
P
are
nt
un
d
er
Part 5, I I)
b
) (iii)
Gualberto v
CA
, G.R. No. 154994.
J ne 28
, 2005
Hontrheros Jr. Intermediate Appellate
C urt
132 SCRA 745
By
Fi
nal
Judgement, Article 229,
FC
Suspension, Article 230-231,
FC
Effe
cts ofDisciplinary
Me
asures,
Articl
e 223 (2), FC
a. Substitute Parental Authority, Article 216-219; 222; 233, FC
See : Rul es on the Legal Guardianship of
Minors
, A.M. NO . 03-02-05-Supremc Co
urt, Ma
y I, 2003.
b. Disciplinary Measures, Article 223224, FC
15
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
16/19
Over Adopted Child, Article 191; 193 (Reinstatement to Natural Parents), FC
Article
135
(Ground for Judicial Separation
of
Property); 4 (Revival if restored), FC
Sec
Concluding Comments of the UN-CRC Committee(25)Emancipation and Age ofMajority
Concept : Emancipation
of
Minors
Recommended Reading: Emancipation ofMinors Law. Div. I I, Part 6, Chap. I, 7000
a. When it Takes Effect and Effect on Emancipated, Article 234 236, FC
b. c c o r ~ e d Agreement, Orphan Minor Child, Article 235, FC (As amended by
RA
6809)
c.
Revival
of
Parental Authority when Married Minor's marriage is declared void or annulled,
Article
237,
FC
(As amended by R 6809)
l'urt
8:
Patemiry and Filiation
(26}Concept of Legitimacy, Article 163-165; Right ofLegitimate Children, Article 174, FC ;
Unson Il/11 Na11arro
/OJ
SCRA 182
a. Legitimated Children, Article 177- I 80; Effect on Descendants, Article 181; Period,
Ground and Interest to Impugn Legitimation, Article
182
, FC
b. Adopted Children, Article
189
; Effects, Article 190; (Grounds for Legal Separation)
55, FC ; Also Sec. 3 (h), RA 9262
c. Exemptions:
Legal Fiction Extension ofLegitimucy, (Adultery) Article 167; (Nulliry) Article
53
54
in relation to Article 36, FC
27} Action to Claim Legitimacy, Article I 73; Proofof Filiation, Article 172 ,
FC
Illegitimacy,
Article
165
, FC
Briones Marice/ Miguel et.al. 440 SCRA 455 Custody of Illegitimate Children)
Reynaldo Espiritu CA and Teresita Masauding
GR
lll5640, 15 March
1995
Exception)
11
re: Stephanie Astorga Garcia GR UBJJIJJ March 2005 Sumame);
See
RA 9255
2 105)
amending Art. 176
o
ire Family Code
16
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
17/19
Supreme Court AM.
No
. 6-11-15,2 October 2007, Rules on
DNA
Evidence
a.
Grounds to Impugn Legitimacy, Articles
166
FC
b.
Rules
on Impugning Legitimac
y,
Article
168
71, FC
Republic
Act No
. 9255, (2002)
Us
e o Fathers Swname(28) Adoption
Republic
Act
8552, Domestic Adoption Act o 1998
Lahorn
vSibulo 406SCRA
JJ5
Jlepub/ic o ile Philippines vs Court
of
Appeals et aL 205
SCRA
356
Bobanovic
eta/.
vs. Montes etc.
et
al. 141
SCRA
.485
a.
Qualifications o Adopter, Article I
83
, FC
b.
Those
who
cannot adopt, Article
184, FC
c. Spouses, Joint Adoption, Article 1
85
186, FC
d.
Effects,
Article 189,
FC
e. Succession Rights, Inheritance, Disinheritance,
Article
190-I 93,
FC
f Written
Consent to be Adopted, When Applicable, Article 188,
FC
(Compare with PD 603
(29)
Summary
Judicial Proceedings
a.\ egal Separation, Article 238-248, FC;
Ru
les on Legal Separation, A. M. NO. 02-1 1-
11
-Supreme
Court, March 15, 2003
b. Cases o Parental Authority, Article
249-2
52,
FC
c. Application
to
related Cases, Article 253,
FC
Articles 41 (Presumptive Death), 51 (Presumptive Legitimes in Void and Voidable Marriages),
(Disagreement in Fixing Domicile) 69, (Objection to exercise
o
profession) 73, (Disagreement
with
Administration
o
ACP)
96
, 1
24
(Disagreement with administration
o
CPP)
and
(Separation in Fact) 127
30. Final Provisions, Article 254-257,
:FC
17
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
18/19
TIPS ON DIGESTING CASES:
You can never escape digesting cases in.the College ofLaw. The objective in digesting cases
is
to
discover how the law was applied. Your professor
is
less interested in the brilliancy of he lawyer or
the parties involved or how they won or lost their case. What matters is how the Supreme Court
resolved the issues.
1. DO NOT DIGEST UNLESS YOU KNOW TIJE CODAL PROVISION.
It's a total waste
o
time. On the contrary, i you
krlow
what the law requires,
i t
is. easy to d,etermine
i f
he ponies
obeyed
or
disobeyed the law. The Court always sides with the party who obeyed the law.
2. DO NOT DIGES f CASES SINGLY. [i]Groups. of cases must be digested together because
they all apply the same law - sometimes in contrasting manner. Spend the most time thoroughly
digesting the first in a batch of cases. Succeeding cases will simply reapply the same principle.
However, look out for reversals ofrulings.
3.
LOOK AT THE
DATES.
PRIOlUTIZE
DIGESTING
LATER
CASES.
Clulnces are, the
latest case will contain a recitation o fearlier cases
-
already digested
by
the ponente (the justice
who actually writes the text o f he decision). Not only that- usually, the poncnte will compare
and
contrast related cases, savlng.you a lot
qf
ime
in a ~ e you
cannot read the
full
text of he original
decision. But set apart a time to
read
the original cases anyway.
4. USE BLOCK DIAGRAMS TO REPRESENT
THE
PARTIES. Reduce the long list ofparties
into
F
iled
an
action against
C
etc. regardless of
how
long the full name of
or is.
Make a
mental chart ofwho
filed
the original case and then trace it from there
-
who won in the original
jurjsdiction, it is always the loser who appeals
i
he case was resolved normally. But 80 o fcases
-r-eaching the Supreme Court are pre-emptive; filed
by
one
o f
he parties before a
final
decision is
reached below. But.fustlhe.same, the party that goes to the Supreme Court is either the losing party
of the party about to lose. Jump to the dispositive portion
and
see i he petitioning party was
succes:.:fitl or not. Then reconstruct the arguments in between, using the liyllabus o f he case (the
first portion o f every SCRA (text) as aid.
5. AT THE VERY LEAST, DIGEST AT LEAST ONE CASE
FROM
EVERY SECTION OF
THE COURSE OUTLINE. It is not the number o f cases you digested that matters bur the
coverage. You must digest
at
least one case
for
every pertinent provision o f aw. Two;
i ou
have
the time. Three,
i
you anticipate a graded recitation.
6
SEEK AN OIJ. ORTUNI I Y TO DISPLAY
WHAT
YOU LEARNED.{[you are calledfor a
recitation
on
a case
you
did nor digest, offor to recite
on
another cases (most profe.rsors will allow
that, so long
as
you
o.ffor
to recite on the same subject matter.) The point is let the professor
krlow
that you attempted to understand the principle at work. If.embarrassed. do not sulk. Listen to the
person reciting
-
their digest
may
be correct and
i t is
it will definitely come out in the exams.
7
DO NOT DEVOUR
ALL
FACTS. YOU DO
NOT
NEED THEM. You can
t1y
applying the
reverse analysis approach. Look at the ruling
and
then find out how the Court arrivedat the n1li11g.
he
Supreme Court throws
out may
irrelevant facts because it is not a trier of acts. Do not
t1y
to
smell
.
out every
fact i
it did not even concern the Justices.
18
-
8/10/2019 Persons syllabus 2.pdf
19/19
8. REMEMBER
THE ANGLE OF CONCERN .
f ou
are digesting
for
a Constilutional Law
subject ignore the issues that do not concernyou.
ead
the case with particular interest on how the
Constitution was applied Ditto
for
other subjects.
9. KEEP
YOUR
DIGEST. YOU
WILL
DEFINITELY ENCOUNTER
THE
SAME CASES IN
YOUR
lllGHER
YEARS. [i]Most cases involve various aspects
of
the law. So the cases you
digested
n
Persons are most likely the
S lJlle
ones you will read
n
Wills and Succession. Your
angle
of
concern will
be
different
of
course, but you will save a lot
of
time
if
you are familiar with
the facts already.