perspectives on growing a graduate program in computational science casc meeting, oct. 4, 2012 terry...
TRANSCRIPT
Perspectives on Growing a Graduate Program in Computational Science
CASC Meeting, Oct. 4, 2012Terry Moore
[email protected], Innovative Computing Laboratory, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
2
Innovative Computing Laboratory
3
A Computational Science Program @ UTK
Interdisciplinary Graduate Minor in
Computational Science
4
A simple conception of Computational Science
5
Interdisciplinary Graduate Minor
• Interdisciplinary• Digitalization and networking have encouraged
interdisciplinary activities —— breaking down silos
• Graduate • Each of the areas in the triangle has a core
curriculum• But there is no core curriculum for Computational
Science
• Minor• Complementary knowledge/skill/expertise to main area
of specialization• Goes on student’s transcript; part of the official record
Requirements for Students• General Idea: Students have a
“home” area for their major degree; IGMCS minor requires a combination of courses “outside of home.” • Masters Level: Requires 9 hours (3
courses) from IGMCS areaS. • 9 hours (3 courses) from the
different areas.• Students must take at least 3 hours
(1 course) from each of the 2 non-home areas
• Doctoral level: Requires15 hours (5 courses) from the pools. • At least 15 hours (5 courses) must be
taken outside the student’s home area.• Students must take at least 3 hours (1
course) from each of the 2 non-home areas
6
Mathematicsand Statistics
ComputerAnd Information
Science
Domain Sciences
7
Internship• Optional but strongly encouraged. • Students in the program can fulfill 3 hrs. of their requirement through an Internship with researchers outside the student’s major. • The internship may be taken offsite, e.g. ORNL, on campus (with a faculty member in another department), or in Industry. IGMCS students have interned at ORNL, Google, Microsoft & Intel. • Internships must have the approval of the IGMCS Program Committee.
8
Machinery of our little slice ofthe Bureaucracy
Student form shows the tailored process works• Plan is
agreed to• Students
execute/Plans can change
• Results are approved
Advisor and Liaison coordinate to tailor/adapt plan for studentAll relevant
parties sign off when plan is completed
IGMCS Participating Departments
Department IGMCS Liaison Email
Biochemistry & Cellular and Molecular BiologyDr. Cynthia Peterson/Dr. Harry Richards *
Chemical and Biomedical Engineering Dr. David Keffer * [email protected]
Chemistry Dr. Robert Hinde [email protected]
Civil and Environmental Engineering Dr. Joshua Fu [email protected]
Earth and Planetary Sciences Dr. Edmund Perfect [email protected]
Ecology & Evolutionary Biology Dr. Paul [email protected]
Electrical Engineering and Computer ScienceDr. Jack Dongarra *Dr. Greg Peterson
[email protected]@eecs.utk.edu
Genome Science & Technology Dr. Cynthia Peterson * [email protected]
GeographyDr. Bruce Ralston (Nicholas Nagel)
Information Science Dr. Devendra Potnis* [email protected]
Materials Science and Engineering Dr. James Morris [email protected]
Mathematics Dr. Vasilios Alexiades * [email protected]
Mechanical, Aerospace and Biomedical Eng. Dr. Kivanc Ekici [email protected]
Physics Dr. Thomas Papenbrock [email protected]
StatisticsDr. Hamparsum Bozdogan
10
Program Administration• IGMCS Program Committee (6 to 8 people)• Subset of the Program Faculty• 1-2 representatives from each of the colleges involved• Renewable 2 year terms• Responsible for oversight: program requirements, approving
courses and department programs, student course selection, etc.
• IGMCS Faculty Liaisons• Any faculty member, assistant professor or above in rank,
nominated by department head and approved by program committee
• Responsible for updating course lists, working with department faculty, student advising student research, serving on student committees
• Administrative Support• A fraction of a person from the Center for Information Technology
Research
11
How it Started
Chancellor says …
Jack, I want a Computational Science Program!
*Dec. 2004
12
Problem 1: Computational Science is not well defined intellectually
This side is well understood: “In every department of physical science there is only so much science, properly so-called, as there is mathematics.” ~Immanuel Kant
Established and familiar disciplines; sometimes controversial where they are becoming
computational
CISE disciplines are new, evolving, disruptive to traditional academic structures
13
Problem 2: Disciplines that are well defined have academic turf
14
How it grew• February 2005: Initial
discussion with a few departments
• May 2005: Solicited input from departments on “Certificate in Computational Science”
• June 2005: Draft material sent to all interested parties
• October 2005: First campus organizing meeting for a UTK Computational Science program
• November 2005: Graduate Dean suggests modeling after Stat’s minor: Intercollegiate Graduate Minor in Statistics (IGMS)
• December 2005: Group meets and agrees on some initial version of the plan
• February 2006: Second Group meeting
• March 2006• Subcommittee formed to
provide plan• Plan circulated and agreed
on• Dean of Graduate School
approves plan• April 2006: “Buy in” from
many parties• May 2006: Curriculum
Committee of the Graduate Council approval
• Fall 2006: Added to 2007 graduate catalogue; other departments join.
• January 2007: IGMCS enrolls its first students
Step 1: Achieve common understandingStep 2: Find a model people already understand
Some Current Stats• 30 students currently in the program• 2 new students: 1 PhD in CEE, 1 MS in INSC• 4 students received an IGMCS minor in summer 2012• 3 PhD: Chemistry, Computer Science, Civil &
Environmental Engineering, • 1 MS: Information Science
• 26 total graduates: 17 PhD, 9 MS• Instrumental in 2 IGERT awards
16
Problem 3: Constant turnover of the technological base
• Everybody knows that computing power is increasing exponentially• It’s now obvious that the observational basis of science --- the data--- is revolutionizing as well• The collaborative infrastructure of science is clearly being revolutionized•What is the role of the University in the age of Khan academy?
17
IGMCS life prospects
• It currently lives on a minimum of resources• Volunteer efforts from IGMCS faculty participants• Fractional administrative support from CITR, i.e.
Jack’s center
• No core curriculum… but there could be, e.g.• Essentials of programming• “Software carpentry”• Managing the digital data life cycle• Domain X for non-domain X’ers
• Considering a full-blown PhD program• Problem: Organizing for “Interdisciplnarity” means
making the walls of the silos permeable
18