pesit ise sar nba 2011

P E S Institute of Technology Department of Information Science & Engineering 2011

Ver. June 2009 NBA Accreditation of UG Engineering Program of 193 pages

Self Assessment Report (SAR)

for NBA Accreditation

of

Undergraduate Program

in

Information Science & Engineering

PES INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

100 Feet Ring Road, Banashankari III Stage,

BANGALORE-560085

National Board of Accreditation New Delhi, India

January, 2011



INDEX SHEET

SL

NO.

CONTENTS PAGE

NO.

1. Declaration 3

2. PART I - INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY (Criteria I and II) 4 to 87

3.

PART II - Department / Programme Summary (Criteria III to

VIII) 88 to 110

4.

PART III - Curriculum, Syllabi, PEOS and Outcomes 111

Annexure 1 Latest NBA Accreditation Copy

Annexure 2 Professional Activities Detail

Annexure 3 List of Five Best and Average Projects

Annexure 4 Faculty Details

Annexure 5 Faculty Publication Details

Annexure 6 Faculty R & D and Consultancy Details

Annexure 7 Facilities and Technical Support Details

Annexure 8 Continuing Education and New Facility Details

Annexure 9 Overall Improvements Details

Annexure 10 Curriculum Details

Annexure 11 List all the course modules

Annexure 12 Course objectives and mapping

Annexure 13 Faculty Expertise Details

Annexure 14 Calendar of Events



DECLARATION

This Self Assessment Report (SAR) is prepared for Current Academic Year 2011-

2012 and Current Financial Year 2010-2011 on behalf of us by the team headed

by the Principal/Director/Vice Chancellor of the Institution. I certify that the

information provided in this SAR is extracted from the records and to the best of

our knowledge, is correct and complete

I understand that any false statement/information of consequence may lead

to the rejection of the application for accreditation for a period of two or more

years. I also understand that the National Board of Accreditation (NBA) or its

subcommittee will have the right to decide on the basis of the submitted SAR

whether the Institution should be considered for an accreditation visit.

If the information of consequence was found to be wrong during the visit or

subsequent to grant of accreditation, NBA has right to withdraw the accreditation

granted, if any, and no accreditation will be allowed for a period of two years or

more.

Name, Designation and Seal of the Chairman

Governing Council of the Institute with signature

Place: Bangalore

Date:



PART I

INSTITUTIONAL SUMMARY

(Criteria I and II)

I.0.1. College/ Institution/University Name and Address:

PES Institute of Technology,

100 Feet Ring Road,

Banashankari III Stage,

Bangalore-560085.

I.0.2. Name, designation, telephone numbers and e-mail id of the contact person for

NBA:

Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy,

Principal & Director

Ph:(080)26724781, 82, 83,

Fax:(080)26720886

[email protected]

I.0.3. History of the College / Institution (including dates of introduction and no. of

seats of various program of study along with NBA accreditation, if any), in

tabular form:

Established in 1988 as the first engineering college under the Peoples Education

Society, PES Institute of Technology [PESIT] is a premier institution with a vision

to create a professionally superior and ethically strong global manpower. PESIT

today is a brand by itself, providing the best quality education and is one of the

most sought after names among students and parents in the country. PESIT has

been consistently getting high order results and university ranks. Carrying on its

mission of reaching out education to a much larger number of students and

committed to an exemplary degree of social obligation, PESIT has initiated several

programs such as free engineering education to the rural Kannada medium students,

Community Development Program (CDP), adoption of government schools,

providing them with furniture and many other facilities, environment-protection

through adoption of public parks, Shiksha Kalpa – a forum that extends financial

assistance to the needy students. PESIT has been upward of 90% level in exam

results with a huge number of students earning Distinctions (>=70%). A special

ceremony is organized during every semester to honour the meritorious students.

In line with its commitment to help the needy students, PESIT issues Scholarships

Evaluators’

Space



cheques ensuring free engineering education for 10 needy students with rural

background.

Under Graduate Courses:

Sl. No. Course

Intake Fixed

by

Government

Year of

Establishment

1 Mechanical Engineering 120 1988

2 Electronics and Communication

Engineering 120 1988

3 Computer Science &Engineering 120 1988

4 Information Science& Engineering 120 1998

5 Telecommunication Engineering 120 1999

6 Biotechnology 120 2002

7 Electrical and Electronics Engineering 120 2006

Total 840

Post Graduate Courses:

Sl. No Course

Intake Fixed

by

Government

Year of

Establishment

1. Master of Business Administration 180 1997

2. Master of Computer Applications 120 1997

M. Tech

3. Manufacturing Science &Engineering 18 2006

4. VLSI Design& Embedded Systems 18 2006

5. Computer Network Engineering 18 2006

6. Digital Electronics& Communication

Systems 18 2007

7. Automotive Engineering 18 2008

8. Software Engineering 18 2010

9. Bioinformatics 18 2010

Evaluators’

Space



I.0.4. Ownership Status: Govt. (Central/State) / Trust / Society (Govt. / NGO /

Private) / Private/ Other (specify) Society (Private)

I.0.5. Financial Status: Govt.(Central/State) / Grants-in-aid / Not-for-profit /

Private-Self financing / Other(specify) Private-Self financing

I.0.6. Nature of Trust / Society: Registered Public Society

List other Institutes/colleges run by the Trust/Society

INSTITUTIONS IN PES GROUP

# Institution Established in

1 PES College of Science & Commerce ....................................... 1973

2 PES Institute of Pharmacy ......................................................... 1982

3 PES Polytechnic ........................................................................ 1983

4 PES College of Pharmacy .......................................................... 1986

5 PES Institute of Technology ...................................................... 1988

6 PES College of Business Management ...................................... 1994

7 PES Institute of Hotel Management ........................................... 1994

8 PES Institute of Technology- MBA ........................................... 1997

9 PES Institute of Technology- MCA ........................................... 1997

10 PES Institute of Medical Science & Research ............................ 2002

11 PES College of Education .......................................................... 2004

12 PES School of Engineering ........................................................ 2005

Evaluators’

Space



I.0.7. External Sources of Funds:

Name of the External Source CFY

2010-11

CFY m1

2009-10

CFY m2

2008-09

NA -- --- ---

I.0.8. Internally Acquired Funds: ( In Lakhs of Rs. )

Name of the Internal Source

CFY

(Budgeted)

2010-11

CFY m1

2009-10

CFY m2

2008-09

Students Fee 2600 2504 2399

Others 260 261 176

I.0.9. Scholarships or any financial assistance provided to students? YES

if provided, basis of scholarship/assistance : Merit/Parent’s limited income/other

# Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 310 Amount 15.50 L in CFY

Others [Free education] 19 Amount 4.05 L

# Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 98 Amount 4.90 L in CFY minus 1


# Assistance[MRD merit scholarships] 238 Amount 11.90 L in CFY minus 2


I.0.10. Basis/examination for admission to the engineering college:

All India entrance / State level entrance / University entrance / 12th

level /

other (specify) CET/COMED-K/AIEEE/JEE.

I.0.11. Total No. of Engineering

Students 866 + 444

Boys 606 + 311

Girls 260 + 133

Total No. of Other Students, if

any NA

Boys NA

Girls NA

I.0.12. Total No. of Employees 544 Male 345 Female 199

Evaluators’

Space



I.0.13. Minimum and maximum number of faculty and staff on roll, in the

Engineering College/Institute/Faculty, during the CAY and the previous CAYs

(1st July to 30

th June):

Item CAY

2010-11

CAY minus 1

2009-10

Cay minus 2

2008-09

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching faculty

in the

Department

165 196 161 181 147 174

Teaching faculty

in

Science &

Humanities

26 31 26 27 24 27

Non-teaching staff 228 241 200 230 196 241

Criterion I: Organization & Governance, Resources, Institutional Support,

Development & Planning

I-I.1 Campus infrastructure and

facility (30)

I-I.1.1 Land, built up area and academic

infrastructure (5)

- Physical resources

available

A. Exclusive for this

college Land 11.50 acres Built up floor space

57107

sqm

B. Shared with other

colleges in this campus,

if any Land

-0-

acres Built up floor space

-0-

sqm

I-I.1.2 Maintenance of academic infrastructure and facilities (5)

Distinct Features:

Maintenance cell is in place to take care of civil, electrical and furniture

routine check-ups and repairs.

Schedule of routine inspection and check-ups is prepared.

Evaluators’

Space



Central complaint register is maintained [Problem Change Management System].

Minor repairs are carried out by in-house staff.

Electrical Staff: 05 Workshop Staff: 06 Plumber: 04

Major repairs are outsourced.

Maintenance cell meets once a month to take review and discuss any major

problems.

Routine cleaning of premises including toilet blocks by contract labors.

Routine cleaning of water tanks, coolers and filters is carried out as per

schedule.

I-I.1.3 Ambience, green cover, water harvesting, environment preservation etc. (5)

Distinct Features:

Ambience:

Academic ambience is enhanced by modern furniture, improved infrastructure

& state of the art facilities in classrooms and laboratories.

Dress code for students.

Library and laboratory facility is made available after college hours and on

holidays.

Internet facility is available 24 hrs with Wi-Fi points.

Study room facility with power back-up is available round the clock during

examination period.

Green cover:

Green cover within institute is enhanced by arranging tree plantations on

various occasions like birthdays and national festivals

No. of Trees in the college campus: 125

No. of Shrubs: 200

Number of species in campus: 82

Water harvesting:

Ground water collection and diversion towards soak pits.

Organization of awareness program on water harvesting for students.

Evaluators’

Space



Environment preservation:

Gardeners under supervision of experienced Garden supervisor are in place for

taking care of plants.

Sufficient water is made available through bore well and separate water supply

scheme.

Segregated solid waste management system is in place.

Waste papers are supplied to proper agencies for recycling.

Solar water heating system is installed in the student hostels.

I-I.1.4 Hostel (Boys and girls) (5)

Hostel for Boys Yes Exclusive/Shared/Rented - Exclusive

# of Rooms 485 # of accommodated students 1010 # in waiting Nil

Hostel for Girls? Yes Exclusive/Shared/Rented- Rented

# of Rooms 216 # of accommodated students 447 # in waiting Nil

Hostel

Rooms

Carpet

Area/Room Number of Rooms

Girls 4/Room 26.82 29



Girls 1/Room 6.5 36

Boys 3/Room 28 153

Boys 3/Room 42.27 40




Evaluators’

Space



I-I.1.5 Transportation facility and canteen (5)

Transport Yes Exclusive/State-transport - Exclusive

# of Buses 11 Facility availed by Students and staff

Canteen Yes

# of Canteens 3 Sitting space 432 sq.m Daily Usage 432 sq.m

I-I.1.6 Electricity, power backup, telecom, water etc (5)

(Specific details in respect of installed capacity, service points for distribution,

water purification etc.)

Electricity:

Electric supply of 440 Volt, 3Phase, AC is available with 04 connections from

KPTCL

Total Sanctioned Load: 900 KVA

Distribution – Separate feeder for each department and hostel

Power back-up:

Stand-by supply: 04 DG sets are used

DG Set Capacity: 40 KVA and 15 KVA, Total:55 KVA

Power back-up through UPS for computer systems

Telecom:

EPABX system is installed to provide intercom connection to each faculty.

BSNL telephone connections: 10

Fax: 02

External calls can be diverted to individual faculty through EPABX.

Internet access in faculty cabins/Labs/Class rooms/WiFi in all buildings.

Source of water supply to campus:

05 bore wells in campus

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space



Water supply scheme from BWSSB

Drinking water – mineral water dispensers in all the building is provided

[Outsourced].

Water storage facilities: Overhead and Underground: Total Capacity: > 1.5 lakhs

Liters

I-I.2 Organization, governance and transparency (20)

Governance is the key activity that connects between the management, staff,

students and the community. We believe it should be effective, efficient and economical

in execution of its duties. We support modern governance and proper administration and

believe these should be carried out in a way that actively acknowledges diversity, that is

respectful of identity and serious belief and that reflects balance. PESIT has a governing

body in place wherein the members are drawn from distinguished cross-sections of the

society as shown in Table below.



GOVERNING BODY MEMBERS

# Name of the Member with

Address Profession Designation

1.

Prof M R Doreswamy

Founder Secretary,

PES Group of Institutions

Bangalore

Educationist, Social Worker,

MLC, Government of

Karnataka Chairman

2.

Prof D Jawahar

Chief Executive Officer,


Bangalore

Chief Executive Officer

PES Institutions Member

3.

Prof Ajoy Kumar

Chief Operating Officer,


Bangalore

Chief Operating Officer

PES Institutions

Member

4.

Sri Ashok K Dogra

Financial Adviser,

University Grants Commission,

New Delhi.

Financial Adviser

UGC

UGC

Nominee

5.

Prof H U Talawar

Director of Technical Education

Government of Karnataka

State Govt. Nominee Member

6.

Dr K G Rangaraju

Former Deputy Director, IIT-R,

102, Rajalakshmi Apts, 24th Main,

VI Phase, J P Nagar,

Bangalore 560 078

Former Deputy Director

IIT-R

VTU

Nominee

7.

Regional Officer

AICTE, SW RO

Bangalore University Campus

P K Block, Palace Road,

Bangalore 560 009

Regional Officer

AICTE Member

8.

Prof J Surya Prasad

Principal & Director,

PES School of Engineering

Bangalore


PES School of Engineering Member

9.

Prof M V Satyanarayana

Director,

PES Degree College

Hanumanthnagar, Bangalore

Director

PES Degree College. Member

10.

Prof T R Seetharam

Department of Mechanical

Engineering,


Bangalore

Chair Professor- Thermal

Engineering Member

Evaluators’

Space



# Name of the Member with

Address Profession Designation

11

Dr K S Sridhar

Department of Mechanical

Engineering,


Bangalore

Dean (Training &

Placement)

PESIT

Member

12.

Dr V Shyam

Director-Technology, Philips

Health Care Innovation Campus

Manyatha Tech Park

Nagavara, Bangalore 560 045

Director-Philips Member

13.

Dr K N Balasubramanya Murthy


PES Institute of Technology

Bangalore 560 085



Member

Secretary

I-I.2.1 Governing body, administrative setup and functions of various bodies (5)

(List Governing, Senate and all other Academic and Administrative bodies, their

memberships, functions and responsibilities, relation of the members of the

members of such bodies with the principal owner of the college/institute, frequency

of the meetings and attendance therein, in tabular form. A few sampler minutes of

the meetings and action taken reports should be annexed.)

We at PESIT believe in totally different kind of work culture. Basically it aims at love

and affection to each and every stake-holder of the institute. Being certified by ISO

9001:2000, PESIT follows the complete ISO terminology to the fullest extent in its day-

to-day life. In particular the concept of process owners, which facilitates a perfect

decentralization of activities and delegation of authorities, has proven itself to be a key

concept in the success achieved by the institute on different counts. The working

methodology basically focuses on student, which is the dearest and least responsible

element of the system. Involvement of each and everyone in the decision-making and the

transparency associated therein also form the important features of the work culture. The

institute functions with perfect decentralized administration as depicted in Figure 1 that

has complete transparency in the decision making process. Institute follows the concept

of process owners as emerged from the ISO terminology.

Evaluators’

Space



Figure 1. Organizational Chart

Evaluators’

Space



I-I.2.2 Defined rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies etc (5)

(List of the published rules, policies and procedures, year of publications,

awareness among the employees/students, availability on web etc.)

Functions of Key Administrative Positions:

The functions of various key positions are depicted in Table below.

PLANNING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE

1 Prof.D.Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman

2 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and Director Member

3 Prof. Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer

& Member - Governing

Body

Member

4 Dr. Kavi Mahesh Professor, Department of

Computer Science &

Engineering

Member

5 Dr. Koshy George Professor , Department

of Telecommunication

Engineering

Convener

Goal: The purpose of Planning and Evaluation Committee is to plan and evaluate

programs and services and to make recommendations accordingly to the Governing Body

of the institute (PESIT).

Plan Fiscal and Budget and Policy and to strengthen collaboration and a shared vision

between the Institute and the Department, as both work to implement a system to

improve and support quality Institute-wide and to offer an array of high quality,

comprehensive, and affordable programs designed to meet the diverse and individual

needs.

Activities: activities may include but are not limited to-

1. Review the Plan of Service and the Bye-Laws and other policies regularly;

2. Review MOUs

3. Review the annual budget and make recommendation to Governing Council;

4. Develop and suggest new programs and services and submit such ideas and

suggestions to the Governing Council;

5. Evaluate programs and services;

Evaluators’

Space



6. Address such other issues as from time to time may be referred to the committee;

7. Recommend a plan of action based on the recommendations of the college

advisory board.

Roles and Responsibilities of Planning and Evaluation Committee:

1. Reviews contractual, legal and or operational issues with the Chief Executive

Officer (CEO).

2. Serves as a sounding board for new programs, policies, or initiatives that may

come before Advisory Board, as may be determined by the P&E.

3. Monitors the implementation of the Institute‟s multi-year Strategic Plan.

4. The P&E generally meets four times in a year duration

GRIEVANCE APPEAL COMMITTEE

1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and

Director

Chairman

2 Dr. R.V.Iyer Assistant Professor

Physics

Convener

3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating

Officer & Member -

Governing Body

Member

4 Mr. Sharanabasappa S Patil Professor,

Mechanical

Engineering

Member

5 Dr.Keshavan.B.K HOD Electrical

Engineering &

Dean-Evaluation

Member

Goal: The Grievance Appeal Committee shall be responsible for collective agreement

dealing with grievances.

Activities: PESIT is committed to providing a harmonious, fair and just learning

environment by ensuring that students and staff have access to processes that allow for

appeals, complaints and grievances to be resolved.

Evaluators’

Space



Student and staff grievance resolution processes seek to facilitate the informal resolution

of grievances as close as possible to the source of student dissatisfaction, though there

will be instances when either students may choose to lodge a formal appeal or a

grievance needs to go to a higher authority for resolution.

PESIT approach to student grievance resolution emphasizes:

Fairness and impartiality

The handling of grievances informally where possible

The principles of natural justice and procedural fairness

Effective, reciprocal communication and feedback

Resolution of grievances as early as possible and as close as possible to the source of

dissatisfaction.

Role and Responsibilities of the Grievance Appeal Committee (GAC)

1. Student Appeals Committee shall hear complaints and appeals arising from the

policies on:

Evaluation and assessment

Academic programs

Student progress

Appeals arising from higher degree research studies.

Student admission

Breaches of academic integrity

Problems arising in the context of their association with the institute, including

those involving faculty misconduct in an instructional setting

Administrative operations or decisions relating to academic matters.

Other policies, not listed above, which provide for scope to the Grievance

Appeals Committee.

2. Jurisdiction: The committee is charged with hearing those student grievances

related to faculty misconduct in the performance of his or her duties in an

instructional setting. It should be understood, however, that certain cases do not

fall under the jurisdiction GAC, but are subject to special investigatory

procedures: cases involving sexual harassment or sexual misconduct; cases

involving discrimination on the basis of race, color, age, national origin, religion,

Evaluators’

Space



gender, sexual orientation, disability, or any other protected status; and cases

involving allegations of fraud or plagiarism in research.

3. The grievance once received, the convener shall be responsible for the

distribution of a copy of the grievance to the other members of the Grievance

Appeal Committee.

4. Investigating a Potential Grievance: The duty of GAC is to provide fair

representation for all of its members. The Committee Member appointed to

investigate a potential grievance shall investigate the grievance and report the

results of the investigation to the Grievance Committee, along with a

recommendation. At all stages in the handing of a potential grievance, the

Grievance Committee and members undertake to maintain a policy of

confidentiality and assess the grievance fairly, without discrimination, and in a

non arbitrary fashion. Depending on the circumstances and seriousness of the

grievance, the investigation shall include:

(i) At least one meeting with the aggrieved member to determine all relevant

facts and secure all relevant documentation. The investigating Grievance

Committee member shall interview or attempt to interview any relevant

witnesses to the facts of the grievance.

(ii) During the course of the investigation, the investigator will maintain

careful notes of interviews with the aggrieved member and relevant

witnesses.

(iii) Fostering intellectual inquiry in a climate of academic freedom and

integrity. Its members, students and faculty alike, are expected to uphold

these principles and exhibit tolerance and respect for others.

(iv) In addition to the written statements and testimony of the student and the

faculty member, the Committee may collect and consider any information

it deems relevant and hear from anyone it deems to have relevant

information. Both the student and faculty member may suggest the names

of persons with relevant information, but the Committee makes the final

decision about whom to interview.

(v) The proceedings and the Committee's deliberations shall be confidential

and not open to the public.

Evaluators’

Space



5. Timeframe for Committee Proceedings, Its Report and the Decision:

The Committee shall make every effort to address requests for reviews

during the monthly meeting after they have been submitted and to inform

students of its decision within 10 working days thereafter. (the Committee

meets only once monthly.)

Grievance Officer Fact Sheet

A. Who is complaining or grieving?

a. Name

b. Department

c. Phone

d. E-Mail

e. Faculty

f. Home address and telephone

g. Name of Dean and Chairperson

B. What is the Complaint or Grievance

C. Dates of Event or Acts of Omission

D. Place of Event

E. List of all interviews with date and times. Notes from all interviews will become part

of the official file.

F. List of all relevant documentation in the official file of the complaint/grievance

Signature of the Grievance Committee Member

Signature of the Griever

Date

Recommendation to GAC

Grievance Accepted or not by GAC

Evaluators’

Space



EXAMINATION COMMITTEE



3 Prof. Nitin V.Pujari Dean –Continuing

Education

Member

4 Dr. J. Suryaprasad Member of Governing

Body

Member

5 Prof. V.Krishnamurthy Dean-Academic affairs Convener

Goal: Planning, conducting examination events and management of evaluation and result

declaration

Activities:

Ensuring syllabus coverage with respect to time according to course information

Planning and conducting exam events (CIE, SEE, Project Presentation evaluation,

etc.)

Ratifying Board of examiners (internal and external)

Monitoring the question paper setting process, evaluation process, tabulation and

grade deduction including result declaration processes.

Ratifying I and X Grades, semester-wise

Providing guidelines to cut-off points, bands to facilitate calculation of grades

Redress appeals related to results and grades

Statistical analysis of results

Framing and prescription of performance evaluation policy

Ratification of decisions of IMPRC

Ensuring communication of definitions, amendments and updates to students and

faculty, exam relating to mattes well in-time.

Ensuring minimal deviations/departures from laid out procedures with respect to

duties of all personnel involved in exam duties

Convener to conduct a minimum of 4 meetings per semester for

appraisals/ratifications/discussion of exam policy matters

Evaluators’

Space



Role and Responsibilities of Exam Committee

The specific roles and responsibilities related to assessment presented below are

complementary to those outlined in the Regulations to conduct Academic Courses of

PESIT.

The examination committee will be responsible to monitor and conduct surveillance with

respect to plan and conduct of examinations (CIE and SEE events, inclusive of theory

and laboratory practice as prescribed by the curriculum and syllabus committee). The

system being autonomous program, the examination committee will have a

comprehensive responsibility of direct and indirect examination, performance and

monitoring duties. Therefore the role and responsibility of the examination committee is

delineated pertaining to Students, Chief Course Instructors (Senior teacher nominated

among the teachers of the department), Course Instructors (Lecturers), HODs, Deans

(Dean, E; Dean, AA).

Students

The responsibility of exam committee, by methods it deems fit from time to time;

will ensure that students are made to:

1. Engage actively in the learning process and participate according to unit and

assessment requirements;

2. Complete assessment tasks diligently and honestly to provide evidence through

performance tests of learning achievements in a course at several defined parts

during semester

3. Meet assessment requirements as specified in the unit outline, including

submission of work by the due date;

4. Discuss any concerns students have regarding their progress in coursework and

assessment as early as possible with relevant lecturers and/or the Chief Course

Instructor, Faculty Adviser,

5. Consult with the CCI (in the first instance) and Course CI, or with the HOD as

early as possible, if personal circumstances are affecting participation or

performance in assessment exam event, lab. practice sessions, promptly, rather

than wait until the final grade is awarded in the course;

Evaluators’

Space



6. Check that their name is on the course list after classes commence and if not, to

contact the FA and/or their CCI.

7. In the case of late enrolment, it is the responsibility of the student to obtain the

Course Information from the CCI in the first week of attendance in the Course;

8. Access and abide by all policies, procedures and regulations relating to

assessment and seek clarification, where necessary.

Chief Course Instructor (CCI)

It is the responsibility of CCI (in consultation with other relevant teachers/staff as

appropriate) to:

1. Design and specify the number and type of assessment tasks and their weightings;

2. Prepare the unit outline in accordance with the procedures (refer to Regulations)

and provide an electronic copy to the Dean (E) Office prior to the start of the

study period;

3. Make the unit outline available electronically to all students enrolled in the course

during the first week of the study period of the semester;

4. Be available for student consultation on a regular basis, informing students of

their availability indicating the place and time for consultations (both with and

without appointment;

5. In exceptional circumstances, where the need arises, seek approval of the HOD to

change assessment tasks or criteria for a unit after the first week of the study

period under intimation to Office of Dean (E). Such changes should not result in

disadvantage to any student and all students must be advised, in writing, of

approved change;

6. Submit examination requests, if required, by the due date and prepare and submit

the examination paper(s) for central examinations by the due date;

7. Prepare and arrange the conduct of all School-based assessment tasks for the

course and alternative/additional assessment tasks, as required;

8. Give consideration to and approve, if appropriate, applications for consideration

of personal circumstances affecting assessment, and forward applications to

HOD;

Evaluators’

Space



9. Liaise with the CI, as required, with regard to applications for consideration of

personal circumstances affecting assessment;

10. Provide appropriate guidelines to CI (lecturers) regarding marks allotment, on

assessment criteria, marking procedures, moderation and methods for calculating

final results;

11. Maintain and collate records of each student‟s marks for all assessment

components in accordance with the pre-decided evaluation norms . Obtain and

secure record of each student‟s results, both electronically and in hard copy from

Office of Dean (E), must be kept for at least one standard study period after the

release of final results (one full year/two semesters after the SEE event;

12. Where appropriate, eg for large classes, provide students with timely feedback on

the distribution of marks or grades for a given exam event / assessment task;

13. If requested, provide clarification to students about a result for an assessment task

or grade in a course;

14. Communicate effectively with all teaching staff, HOD and Office of Dean(E)

and/or marking in a course to ensure quality of practice;

Course Instructors (Lecturers)

1. It is the responsibility of lecturers to:

2. Participate in the Conduct and evaluation of CIE and SEE events of students;

3. Liaise with the CCI to ensure that evaluation practices are conducted in a

consistent and coherent manner;

4. Be available for student consultation on a regular basis, informing students of

their availability for student consultations (both with and without appointments);

5. Advise the CCI within a reasonable time of student progress and how effectively

students are learning;

6. Keep a secure record of each student‟s results, both electronically and in hard

copy,

7. Provide data relating to results in assessment tasks/exam events and attendance, if

required, to the CCI.

Evaluators’

Space



Faculty Advisers

It is the responsibility of FA to:


of personal circumstances affecting evaluation and liaise with relevant staff, as

required;

ii. Have a copy of enrollment forms and courses with respect to students assigned

and advise course registration process and discuss course content and level of

difficulty of the course

2. Overview students‟ progress and provide academic advice based on evaluation

assessment outcomes and, if necessary, consider submissions from students to

show cause why enrolment (course registration) should not be terminated;

3. Monitor the interim and final performance of students assigned and liaise with

parents, if required.

HODs

It is the responsibility of Heads of Department to:

1. Oversee all the courses offered by that department;

2. Appoint CCIs for each course offered and administered by their department;

3. Evaluate and approve requests from CCIs to change assessment tasks or criteria

for a course after the first week of the study period. Such changes should be made

only in exceptional circumstances and not disadvantage any student;

4. Ensure that Course Information sheets are reviewed and accurate prior to

publication and distribution to students;

5. Ensure that examination question papers are reviewed and accurate prior to

submission, and are submitted by the relevant due date to designated official of

Office of Dean(E);


of personal circumstances affecting assessment and liaise with relevant staff, as

required

7. HOD may nominate another staff member in the department to ratify grades

deduced by Dean (E) Office;

Evaluators’

Space



8. Recommend and substantial with records students deserving X and I grades in

exceptional circumstances;

9. Review the performance of students undertaking courses offered by the

Department, paying particular attention to results that are borderline between

grades;

10. Monitor the appropriateness of allocation of grades in accordance with the

Academic Regulations and the effectiveness of evaluation assessment practices in

courses administered by the department (with advice from the Dean AA);

11. Ensure all ratified grades are submitted by the due date;

12. Consider reports from CCIs about alleged breaches of academic honesty

(malpractice) and determine in line with the Institute Malpractice Review

Committee;

Ensure that institutes quality assurance processes for evaluation, such as

moderation of assessment in courses, are followed;

13. Ensure the Institute Evaluation Assessment Policy and Procedures and Academic

Regulations are implemented;

14. Consider requests for review of termination of a student‟s enrolment;

15. Oversee the status of unallocated final result grades and ensure their timely

conversion to final grades coordinating with office of Dean (E).

Evaluation Review Committees

An Evaluation Review Committee will be established by a Head of Department to review

evaluation assessment outcomes for the department. The role and responsibilities of the

Assessment Review Committee will be specified by the Head of department at the time

of its establishment and should be reviewed annually. Responsibilities so delegated by

the Head may include the following:

i. Review the performance of students undertaking courses offered by the

department, paying particular attention to results that are borderline between

grades;

ii. Monitor the appropriateness of allocation of final result grades in accordance

with the Academic Regulations. Evidence to substantiate recommendations

regarding grades may be requested from CCIs;

Evaluators’

Space



iii. Advise the HOD, who will submit CIE evaluation marks to Dean(E);

iv. Monitor the effectiveness of evaluation practices in courses offered by the

department using, amongst other means, statistics on grade distribution;

v. Make recommendations to the HOD regarding evaluation policy, procedures

and outcomes.

Dean (Evaluation)

It is the responsibility of Dean, E to receive, file and secure the official (by principal)

signed copy of following documents:

Syllabus copies of all courses (from Institute Curriculum Committee, approved

syllabus from Academic Council)

University and Institute Academic Regulations (from Principal and Dean AA)

Evaluation Policy with respect to all courses/exam events (from Principal)

Student list (from Admissions)

Course information sheets of all courses (from HODs)

Time Table of lecture and lab sessions of all courses of the semester, syllabus

coverage prior to exam events of both CIE and SEE (from HODs)

Receive syllabus coverage from CIs forwarded by HODs as and when required

List of eligible and non-eligible students appearing for SEE

CIE marks lists (from HODs)

Course registration enrollment forms of all students to all courses (from HODs)

List of potential examiners both internal and external, at least three in number

each, for all courses (from HODs)

University communications, correspondence relating to evaluation, examination

(from Principal)

It is the responsibility of Dean, E by the executive orders from Principal and Director to:

a. Be a party to academic audit committee; submit reports (to Principal)

b. Conduct examinations for all courses under the directions of examination

committee; conducting examination comprise of organizing setting of question

papers sought from examiners,

c. Appointing examiners (by the directions of Principal)

d. Receive Set Question Papers and ensure its security and confidentiality

e. Drawing time-table for all the examinations and courses, appointing invigilators,

drawing invigilation schedule

Evaluators’

Space



f. Be a party to issuance of hall tickets to eligible students

g. Oversee the conduct of examinations (both theory and lab practice)

h. Be a party to malpractice reported cases, organize IMPRC meets and

communicate the decision to the concerned students by coordinating with institute

exam squad

i. Conduct pre-evaluation meeting for discussion of scheme and solutions received

from paper setters and record minutes of the meeting

j. Organize central evaluation of answer script, coding, de-coding process, marks

entry, tabulation, verification, grade evolution processes

k. Announce results, conduct answer-script viewing program, organize challenge

evaluation process

l. Receive appeals from students related to examinations and organize redresses and

case disposals as an when such appeals are received

m. Prepare grade cards and disburse to students

n. Communicate and submit results to university as and when requisitions arrive to

office forwarded by Principal

o. Upkeep, maintain and update all examination records- for reference and

submission to university audit committee

Dean (Academic Affairs)

It is the responsibility of Dean, AA redress student appeal with respect to grades /

termination of registration of a course:

A student may appeal to the Dean, AA in relation to the outcome of an appeal to the

Principal; regarding a review of a decision regarding a grade in a course or termination of

a student‟s enrolment. The Dean, AA will deal with the appeal at his or her discretion in

accordance with the Academic Regulations.

ADMISSION COMMITTEE

1 Prof. D.Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman

2 Mr. Rahul Parmar Dean - Admissions Convener

3 Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and Director Member

4 Dr. T.R Seetharam Chair Professor-Thermal

Engineering

Member

5 Prof. M.V.Sathyanarayana Member - Governing

Body

Member

Evaluators’

Space



Goal: To recommend policies that define mission and implement the admissions. To

Consider and make recommendations concerning the proposals on admissions on student

populations on Undergraduate Post Graduation and Doctoral Education

The purpose of the admissions process is to recruit students who will be best able to

benefit from the experience of their chosen course.

Activity: The Committee shall focus on the following major issues:

Structure and nomenclature and prescription of course/s as and when they are

planned

Delineate the admissions process for students

Provide guidelines to admission and support of transfer students

Provide guidelines to admission recruitment of out-of-state students

Responsibilities of the Admissions Committee (ADC)

1. The Admissions Committee is responsible for monitoring and keeping under

review the Institute‟s student admissions requirements and where appropriate for

formulating proposals for enhancing student access, transfer and progression

arrangements.

2. The Institute‟s admissions procedures shall operate within the legal framework of

the State Government ordinances and the relevant legislation. The committee

shall be familiar with the policies and procedures governing the admissions

process; understand the intake targets;

3. The committee shall ensure that admissions are conducted in a fair and equitable

manner and for the management of the admissions process. This includes

checking that applicants at least meet the minimum requirements for admission,

as laid down by the university regulations, in addition to the entry requirements

for a particular course. The committee is also responsible for communicating any

decisions to applicants in a timely, appropriate and accurate manner. The

committee should provide admissions with application statistics on a regular basis

to monitor overall progress in meeting recruitment targets.

Evaluators’

Space



4. The committee shall provide clear operational procedures, which define the roles

of staff involved in the admissions process and lay down the framework for a

transparent and fair admissions process.

5. To recommend and review admission and re-admission policies that ensure

PESIT as an institute most sought after from cross section of society, particularly

the student-parent community.

6. Review of forms for admission and revise them as needed.

7. Keep the Governing body informed of trends in admissions.

8. The ADC shall meet at least twice in a semester of 6 months duration.

LIBRARY COMMITTEE

1 Prof. D.Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman


3 Ms. Gayathri Sen Librarian Convener

4 Dr. Kanchan Garg Assistant Professor,

Physics

Member

5 Dr. Kishore T Kashyap Professor, Department of

Mechanical Engineering

Member

Goal: The Library Committee is responsible for advising on, developing and monitoring

policies on information storage and retrieval and other library issues within the Institute.

Activity: The Library Committee provides a forum for open discussion of matters

relating to the Library and its services.

The committee provides an opportunity to share in policy-making decisions and to make

suggestions for improvements in service provision.

Role and Responsibilities of Library Committee (LC)

The Faculty Library Committee will:

Formulate Library Policy that support the goals and objectives and the mission of

the library; Policies refer to the philosophy, rules and regulations under which the

library operates; Policy is implemented through the use of procedures; The library

committee together with the director and CEO determines library policy.

Evaluators’

Space



The committee shall establish a short and long range strategic plan and implement

policy to achieve stated goals; Ensure that Library strategy, policies and services

take account of equality of opportunity (Strategic plan formulation questions:

Where are we now? Where do we want to go? The “vision” - how do we see

ourselves within the Institute and outside? How do we carry out this vision? The

strategic plan is dynamic and can be revised if necessary; it should allows for

budgetary planning, staff allocation and student service and consults the

departments of the institute)

Monitor and encourage effective communications among the library

administration, the Faculty and Departments;

Exchange information about the library and information requirements of the

academic community of departments, centres and students; disseminate

information and good practice with respect to the provision of library services,

delivered in collaboration between departments and centres and the Library

Contribute to the development of library and information strategy, policies,

services and resources

To discuss strategic requirements and priorities which will inform the Library's

budget setting

Report to and advise the Principal on Library matters and deal with matters

referred to it by the departments;

Report to and advise the Research Committee and the Teaching and Learning

Committee on Library matters and deal with matters referred to it by these

committees;

scrutinize policies proposed by the Library for their implications for teaching and

research in the Faculty of Engineering, business administration, science and other

disciplines of the institute;

monitor budget allocations to the subject areas within the Library;

Consider acquisitions procedures and collection development of the library.

Monitor the effectiveness of instruction offered by the Library to instructors, and

graduate and undergraduate students.

The Library Committee shall submit an annual report to Principal & Director

which should detail the manner in which the Committee's delegated

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space

http://www.library.ualberta.ca/subject/hss/index.cfm



responsibilities have been exercised by describing the Committee's activities of

the previous twelve months.

The Committee shall meet once a semester.

STUDENT WELFARE COMMITTEE

1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and Director Chairman

2 Dr. V.Krishnamurthy Dean-Academic affairs Member

3 Prof.K.S.Rohini Professor , Physics Member

Goal: The rationale of Student Welfare Committee is to strongly support the

development of supportive relationships among students, parents and school staff. The

aim is to facilitate the social health of each student and to encourage a sense of belonging

to the institute-community, thereby fostering the development of the resilient student and

encourage an environment of community trust

Activity: The Student Welfare Committee (SWC) of the institute shall operate by:

Involving parents and the community in our proceedings.

Encouraging supportive relationships based on mutual respect that encourages

students to behave responsibly.

Teaching and fostering social skills necessary to learn and involve in extra-curricular

activities together.

Develop an awareness of the consequences for choosing unacceptable behaviours.

Implement a curriculum that engages all students in overall personality of student-

community.

The role and responsibilities of Student Welfare Committee (SWC)

1. The SWC shall promote parental and student community involvement by

promoting a culture of open communication within the institute and the student

community;

2. Shall liaise with school executive, promote awareness of welfare issues and

encourage a caring environment; shall initiate staff development related to student

welfare

3. Shall support families through plan and conducting of parenting skills programs;

shall consult parents and the community on issues that affect children‟s

Evaluators’

Space



development and academic and extra-curricular activity learning within the

institute; encourage involvement o students and parents

4. Shall be responsible to create awareness of consequences for choosing

unacceptable behaviors by developing individual classroom rules with clearly

defined limits and guidelines; by publishing a list of school rules and expectations

that will be sent to each family; by encouraging students through discussion,

explanation and counseling, to make decisions and choices with the

understanding that unacceptable behavior incurs consequences to self and others;

foster the development of co-operative skills and inquiry learning coupled with

recognition for positive behaviors.

5. Shall publish a booklet of institute rules & regulations to be discussed at the

institute and reinforced at home; Staff, students and parents shall be invited to

contribute suggestions to the rule booklet to ensure Student Welfare and

Discipline Procedures and Assertive Discipline will operate.

6. The Student Welfare Committee, through an evaluation program, will review

strategies annually and report to Principal and Director on student welfare issues.

The Evaluation sources include: A record of student campus and classroom

behavior will be maintained; Student absence information; School-based surveys

on bullying and social skills; and Parent surveys on social competencies.

EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE

1 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer & Member

- Governing Body

Chairman

2 Prof.K.Chidambara Professor, Computer Science Convener

3 Mr. S.V Satish Associate Professor, Mechanical

Engineering

Member

4 Mr. V.Krishna Associate Professor, Mechanical

Engineering

Member

5 Mr. M.S Vinay Director(Sports) Member

Goal: Fostering integrative learning across courses, over time, and between campus and

community life is an important goal of undergraduate education.The outcomes are being

healthy, staying safe, enjoying and achieving, making a positive contribution, and

Evaluators’

Space



achieving economic wellbeing. Extracurricular activities for the students are gains in

motivation, independence and a real sense of enjoyment and fun. They are not

compulsory, they're absolutely voluntary; they give them team-working skills.

Activity: The committee shall plan and conduct sports activities such as Cricket,

Volleyball, Badminton, Basketball, Athletics etc. over the institute‟s fields. Apart from

this, the students can also avail of the facilities of a state of the art Gymnasium. The

activities could include organizing and celebrating the Independence Day, republic day

and other festivities as planned and determined by the committee from time to time

Role and responsibilities of the Extra-curricular activities committee:

1. Develop mission statement, pamphlet for athletes and parents describing goals

and expectations of sports teams each season including behaviour guidelines.

Mission statement should reflect the institutional Standards and include the

elements of Competence, Character, Civility, and Citizenship.

2. Develop institutional extra-curricular activity policy to provide further support

and guidance on matters related to sports and other sports related activities;

Increase activities and opportunities especially given the array of current

offerings and its appeal to students.

3. Develop communication system to inform middle school parents and students of

the practice schedule, competition schedules, weather related schedule changes,

directions to the departments and playing fields.

4. The committee shall committee organizes a sports meet once a year and different

matches and tournaments are held throughout the year on a regular basis. It

should ensure that there is also an active participation of faculty and staff.

5. Ensure that for each branch (department), there is an association which organizes

extracurricular activities, lectures and competition both at the inter class as well

as inter college levels to stimulate interest in the subject.

6. The committee should strive for student engagement in extracurricular activities

which is considered a best practice to foster student learning. One of the approach

would be to monitor and organise Extended Week Day Activity involving as

many students in intra- and inter departmental extracurricular activities (sports,

Evaluators’

Space



cultural and fests); The positive elements of intramural sports can be used to

further enhance the inter-institutional program and/or enhance skill development

of other sports.

7. Ensure In-house programs that benefit the most students possible should receive

priority.

8. Maintaining neutrality in institutional selection and celebrate the

accomplishments of our sports teams regardless of the number of wins and losses.

Preservation of our existing programs and any plans for the future should insure

the continued success of those programs.

ACADEMIC AUDIT COMMITTEE

1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya

Murthy

Principal and Director Chairman

2 Prof.M.Anuradha HOD, Telecommunication Convener

3 Dr.A.Saumya Adikhari Professor, Electronics &

Communication Engineering

Member

4 Ms. Geetha Shankar Assistant Professor,

Mathematics

Member

5 Dr. Rangaraju.M.S HOD, Master of Business

Administration

Member

Goal: Focusing on Oversight, Open Communication, and Best Practices; Academic

quality in the Institute requires that the agreed aims, overall objectives and learning

outcomes of educational programmes are consistently achieved.

Activities: The Committee reports to the Director and Principal on issues of Teaching,

Learning & Assessment. Its regular work-activities include:

Monitoring the programme of internal reviews of learning and teaching

Monitoring the annual academic audit process

Monitoring the provision and analysis of course information prescription and

conduct evaluation through questionnaires and report twice in a semester

Role and responsibilities of Academic audit committee

1. To oversee the implementation, management and monitoring of the Institute‟s

quality enhancement strategy, by means which include the following:

Evaluators’

Space



a. An annual check by the Learning and Teaching Quality Assurance Officer that

practice conforms to the national guidelines issued by the Quality Assurance

Agency for Higher Education (QAA).

b. Receiving a report from each Head of Department auditing all teaching and

learning during the running session; interviewing a selection of Heads on the

basis of the report, ensuring that each Head is interviewed at least once during a

six-month semester period; and ensuring that the results are reported and

appropriate action is initiated.

c. Conducting periodic reviews of teaching, learning and assessment in each

department (both theory and practical sessions).

d. Initiating special reviews, following requests from the Deans, in-charges of

individual academic programmes.

2. To advise Academic Council on any changes to the Institute‟s academic audit

procedures.

3. To liaise with other committees on matters relating to Academic audit.

4. To advise the Principal and Director annually of the level of risk identified

through academic audit.

5. The Convener of the Academic Audit Committee is to convene at least two

meetings every semester.

ANTI-RAGGING COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Dr.C.V.Srikrishna Professor , Master of

Computer Applications

Convener

3 Mr. Srinivas R Assistant Professor , Master of


Member

4 Mr. T.S.Seetharaman Warden – Boys Hostel Member

5 Mr. M.S.Vinay Sports Director Member

Goal: Ragging of any kind is declared as a criminal offence and is strictly banned in the

campus, its hostels as per the Hon‟ble Supreme Court directions. The goal of the

Evaluators’

Space



committee is to uphold, comply and to be vigilant to the departures in this directive of the

court. Ragging needs to be perceived as failure to inculcate human values.

[Directives of the Supreme Court of India, dated May 16, 2007 in SLP No (s) 24295 of

2006 University of Kerala Vs Council, Principals‟, Colleges, Kerala & Ors (with SLP(C)

No. 24296-99/2004 & W.P. (Crl) No. 173/2006 and SLP(C) No. 14356/2005).

Activities: The committee to look into the nuisance of ragging; Studying various aspects

of ragging, means and methods to prevent it, possible action that can be taken against

those who indulge in it, and action against offenders in the event of ragging.

Role and responsibilities of Anti Ragging Committee:

Publicise and ensure all students read the recommendations of Supreme Court

recommendations; The recommendations imply the role and responsibility of anti-

ragging committee:

1. The punishment to be meted out has to be exemplary and justifiably harsh to act

as a deterrent against recurrence of such incidents.

2. Every single incident of ragging where the victim or his parent/guardian or the

Head of institution is not satisfied with the institutional arrangement for action, a

First Information Report must be filed without exception by the institutional

authorities with the local police authorities. Any failure on the part of the

institutional authority or negligence or deliberate delay in lodging the FIR with

the local police shall be construed to be an act of culpable negligence on the part

of the institutional authority. If any victim or his parent/guardian of ragging

intends to file FIR directly with the police, that will not absolve the institutional

authority from the requirement of filing the FIR.

3. In the prospectus to be issued for admission by educational institutions, it shall be

clearly stipulated that in case the applicant for admission is found to have

indulged in ragging in the past or if it is noticed later that he has indulged in

ragging, admission may be refused or he shall be expelled from the educational

institution.

4. It shall be the collective responsibility of the authorities and functionaries of the

concerned institution and their role shall also be open to scrutiny for the purpose

Evaluators’

Space



of finding out whether they have taken effective steps for preventing ragging and

in case of their failure, action can be taken; for example, denial of any grant-in-

aid or assistance from the State Governments.

5. Anti-ragging committees and squads shall be forthwith formed by the institutions

and it shall be the job of the committee or the squad, as the case may be, to see

that the Committee's recommendations, more particularly those noted above, are

observed without exception and if it is noticed that there is any deviation, the

same shall be forthwith brought to the notice of this Court.

6. The Committee constituted pursuant to the order of this Court shall continue to

monitor the functioning of the anti-ragging committees and the squads to be

formed. They shall also monitor the implementation of the recommendations to

which reference has been made above.

7. Ensure taking a signed undertaking from students in tune with the provisions of

anti-ragging verdict by Hon‟ble Supreme Court ( the format, as below)

Goal: Prevention of sexual harassment should be improved to ensure that legal

obligations are being met; Any person aggrieved in this matter may fearlessly approach

the committee for a fair and concerned hearing and redressal.

Role and responsibility of Anti-sexual harassment committee:

1. To ensure provision of a work and educational environment that is free from sexual

harassment (Sexual harassment is defined by law from the perspective of the person

who feels they have been harassed and it occurs if the person who feels they have

been harassed feels offended, humiliated, or intimidated by the conduct and it is

ANTI-SEXUAL HARASSMENT COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Dr. K.Narasimha Murthy HOD, Mechanical Engineering Convener

3 Prof. V.S Chakravarthy HOD, Science & Humanities Member

4 Prof. Shylaja S S HOD, Information Science &

Engineering

Member

5 Ms. M.S.Sunitha Assistant Professor, Electronics

& Communication Engineering

Member



reasonable, in all the circumstances that the person who feels they have been

harassed would feel offended, humiliated or intimidated).

2. To take all reasonable steps (active and preventive in nature) to prevent the

harassment occurring; To address any oral/written complaint about: unwelcome

sexual advances, unsolicited acts of physical intimacy, unwelcome requests for

sexual favours or other unwelcome conduct of a sexual nature. Unwelcome conduct

of a sexual nature includes oral or written statements of a sexual nature to a person,

or in a person's presence.

3. Obtain high level support from the chief executive officer and Principal & Director

for implementing a comprehensive strategy:

providing information to all staff and students about what constitutes sexual

harassment and about their responsibility not to sexually harass other staff and

students

providing information and training to managers, supervisors and staff conducting

teaching and learning activities on meeting their responsibilities in relation to

maintaining a work and study environment free from sexual harassment

4. Develop a written policy which prohibits sexual harassment.

The Institute shall have a Sexual Harassment Policy. The policy outlines the

Institute‟s key commitments and legal responsibilities and provides a definition of

sexual harassment and behaviours that are not acceptable.

Complaints of sexual harassment are handled separately for staff and students

under the Staff Complaints Policy and Sexual Harassment Complaints Resolution

Procedures for students.

5. Regularly distribute and promote the policy at all levels of the organisation; Ensure

that managers and supervisors discuss and reinforce the policy at staff meetings;

Provide the policy and other relevant information on sexual harassment to new staff

as a standard part of induction; Periodically review the policy to ensure it is

operating effectively and contains up to date information.

6. Display anti-sexual harassment posters on notice boards in common work areas and

distribute relevant brochures; Conduct regular awareness raising sessions for all

staff on sexual harassment issues.

7. Ensure that complaints processes:

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space



are clearly documented;

are explained to all employees;

offer both informal and formal options for resolution;

address complaints in a manner which is fair, timely and confidential;

are based on the principles of natural justice;

provide clear guidance on internal investigation procedures and record keeping;

give an undertaking that no employee will be victimised or disadvantaged for

making a complaint;

Go

al: Purchase of items/services/goods/equipments on project funds and institute funds.

Role and responsibilities of Purchase Committee:

Formulate a Purchase Procedure taking into consideration of small, medium and

big expenditure utilizing either institute-fund or project grant funds.

Calling for quotations:

a. Purchases up to Rs.25,000/- : without calling for quotations but after satisfying

that the items purchased or services acquired are of requisite quality /

specification and have been purchased from a reliable supplier at a reasonable

cost.

b. Purchases above Rs.25,000/- and up to Rs.100,000/- : Minimum 3 quotations are

to be called for.

PURCHASE COMMITTEE

1 Prof. D. Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman


Murthy

Principal and Director Convener

3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer &

Member - Governing Body

Member

4 Dr.Venkatesh Vadde Professor, Electronics &


Member

5 Dr.V.Raghupathy Professor, Mechanical

Engineering

Member



c. Purchases above Rs.100,000/- and up to Rs.10.00 lakh: Notice inviting

quotations should be sent to minimum 6 firms as far as practicable. Such

quotations should be obtained either from the manufacturers directly or

authorized dealers / distributors who are registered with the Commercial Tax

Department of the respective State (for VAT purpose)

d. Purchases above Rs.10.00 lakh/-: Quotations should be obtained by giving wide

publicity in the local newspapers. (One or more news papers as situation may

demand) in the classified column in respect of stores / consumables. In respect of

scientific equipment and related items, tendering through websites system may

also be resorted to in addition to news paper advertisement.

e. Quotation, as far as possible, should be called for from the original manufacturers

/ principals / reputed and regular dealers only. In cases where quotations are

obtained from the agents, a letter of authorization or dealership from the principal

is required to be obtained.

d. To ensure sound financial status, the manufacturer / suppliers are to be asked to

mention in the quotation their valid Sales Tax / VAT / Service Tax / PAN

registration references

Opening of quotations and preparation of Comparative Statements

a. As soon as the last date for receipt of quotations is over, each envelope containing

the quotations should be initialed and serially numbered and then opened by the

purchase proposer ( to be invited by purchase committee) in the presence of two

to three members (depending upon the value of quotation) (preferably from the

PC). The representatives of the firm may be allowed to be present on the specified

date where substantial amount of

Purchases is involved, say above Rs.25,00,000/-. Dated initials of all the members

present while opening the quotations should be obtained on each page of the

quotation duly high lighting the corrections if any, in the quotation.

b. A Comparative Statement of the rates quoted by each firm is required to be

prepared simultaneously. A list of quotations which are not considered for

inclusion in the Comparative Statement is to be prepared duly recording the

reason(s) for non inclusion.

Evaluators’

Space



Following precautions are required to be taken while preparing a comparative

statement.

(i) Basic rate of each item and the taxes, insurance, freight etc., are required

to be exhibited in the comparative statement. In case spares / attachments

also are being purchased along with the main equipment, then separate

column may be opened for these items.

This would facilitate comparison. Wherever discount has been offered, it

may be indicated under the „total‟ column with a view to arrive at the net

cost quoted.

(ii) Special conditions relating to payment, place of delivery of articles, time

schedule for supply, warranty, any other charges etc., are required to be

noted in the comparative statement. Monetary value of all the items is to

be included when arriving at net cost quoted.

(iii) The dated signatures of the officials preparing and checking the

comparative statement are invariably required to be enfaced on the

comparative statement.

(iv) Reasons / justification for rejecting the lowest quotations, if any, should

also be recorded on the comparative statement.

(v) Late quotations (i.e. quotations received after the specified time of

opening), delayed quotations (i.e. quotations received before the time of

opening but after the due date and time of receipt of quotations) and post

quotations offers, should not be considered.

c. When the quotations are under examination, no other authority should be allowed

to make queries or call for reports or exercise any sort of influence, as it is

improper and would lead to delays in taking correct decisions

d. Validity of quotation should be sufficiently longer, say upto 60 days, so that the

proposal can be processed without any need for seeking re-validation.

e. From among those suppliers meeting all the specifications prescribed by us, the

one who has quoted the lowest may be called for negotiation , if felt necessary

Documents required to be kept in any purchase proposal file:

A neatly arranged and prepared file (not loose sheets), serially numbered, may be

opened, keeping the following documents therein:

Evaluators’

Space



a) Notice inviting quotations / tenders and / or a report of survey conducted.

b) Copy of „in principle approval‟, if available

c) Quotations / bids received (all in original)

d) Report of the Technical committee (in the case of two-bid system).

e) Comparative Statement(s) – pre-negotiation and post-negotiation, signed

by the proposer on each

e) Purchase Proposal in the prescribed format, duly obtaining the signatures

of the PC members (wherever required)

Placing Purchase Orders:

a. All proposals which require approval of the appropriate authorities (Heads of

Department, Principal etc.) Empowered to sanction the expenditure, are required

to be submitted to them duly complying the formalities

a. As soon as approval of the appropriate authority is obtained for purchase of the

articles etc from a particular firm, a purchase order should be placed on the firm

duly specifying the terms & conditions of the institute of the quotation by the

indenter. Acknowledgement of purchase order is to be obtained from the party.

Each purchase order should be assigned a separate serial number in each financial

year commencing from serial number one on 1st April and ending the last serial

number on the 31st March. For this purpose a purchase Order Register should be

maintained. Maintenance of a purchase Order Register is mandatory and Internal

Audit should ensure about it. A review of pending purchase orders should be

made periodically and necessary follow up action taken with the firms concerned

for expediting the supplies.

b. A copy of the purchase order/work order/service order may be sent to Bills

Section / Projects Section as the case may be so that while admitting the bill for

payment, they may be linked with the P.O. and make an endorsement as paid &

cancelled. The unpaid P.Os will be reviewed at the end of 31st March and report

given to Accounts Section quantifying the out standings to account for them as

O/S Liabilities in the Balance Sheet.

c. Receipt of the equipment etc, the indenting official shall take steps for installation

and commissioning. Upon satisfactory commissioning, suitable entries in the

Assets Registers (in respect of durable and long life items) or in the Stock

Evaluators’

Space



Register (in respect of consumable items) shall be made. These details are

required to be noted on the back side of the invoice / bill with proper attestation

bearing full signature with date and stamp.

d. As regards the purchase for Projects by the respective Project Investigators, a

copy of the purchase order and invoice may be marked to the Head/Principal, so

that the stock register is periodically updated by the School Office on receipt of

the same.

e. The F&A should send a copy of the cheque forwarding memo to the user

department to update the Bills Register.

RESEARCH COMMITTEE

1 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and Director Chairman

2 Dr.A.Srinivas Dean , Research &

Development

Convener

3 Dr. S. Natarajan Professor, Information

Science & Engineering

Member

4 Dr. C.S.Ramesh Professor, Mechanical

Engineering

Member

Goal: Promotion of Research culture. Facilitation and promotion of the development of

strategic direction of research within the Faculty, improvements in the quality and impact

of that research, and the growth of local, national and international research

collaborations.

Role and responsibilities of Research Committee

1. Advise the Dean R & D on all Faculty matters relating to Research and Research

of Higher Degree students;

2. Facilitate growth of research activity in the Faculty, including developing

mechanisms and targets to achieve this;

3. Develop and maintain, coordinate and plan the development of research

infrastructure across the Faculty;

4. Develop and coordinate strategies for maximising the Faculty‟s success in

gaining external research funding;

5. Members to Chair the Faculty‟s Research Committee (departmental /

institutional) and ensure regular communication among the Faculty‟s Research

Evaluators’

Space



Higher Degree coordinators wherever research that could lead to dissertation,

report or thesis is produced;

6. Assume the responsibility for the establishment of policy and procedures for the

allocation of funds in those areas specified by the Research Dean in consultation

with Principal & Director of the Institute;

7. Assume responsibility for the evaluation of Faculty applications for internal

faculty funding research project schemes;

8. Represent the Faculty on appropriate University Committees, working parties and

review teams e.g. University Research Committee;

9. Maintain and disseminate current information about relevant research policy areas

and initiatives in government (state and central), in the professions and in relevant

industries, including external funding opportunities;

10. Develop strategies to foster research collaborations within the Faculty, across

Faculties and Institutes, industries and with parties abroad.

11. Evolve institutional policy of PhD admission/evaluation criteria

12. Explore student/faculty exchange programs with national and international

research institutes

13. Formulate faculty incentive provisions with respect to article publications in peer-

reviewed journals.

14. Promote/ encourage faculty-student research leading to obtain patents.

15. Strive for high research conduction and planning activities and promote research

culture across the institute.

BOARD OF APPOINTMENTS AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW

1 Prof. D. Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman

2 Dr. K.N.Balasubramanya Murthy Principal and Director Convener

3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Member - Governing Body Member

4 Dr.J.K.Suresh VTU-Nominee Member

5 Dr.Jayaraj VTU-Nominee Member

6 Dr.T.R.Seetharam Chair Professor- Thermal

Engineering

Member

7 Dr.K.N.Seetharamu Professor – Thermal

Engineering

Member

Evaluators’

Space



Goal: Performance management system for academic professional and administrative

(Personnel – Faculty: Technical & non-technical & Administration) employees that is

delivered in a manner that is appropriate to the nature of the work, appropriately

recognizes and rewards exemplary performance (promotions, etc.), provides for the

growth and development of the employee, and addresses substandard performance.

Role and responsibility of board of appointments and performance review

1. The board shall be responsible for Conducting the annual performance

review

a. Review of Annual Performance Summary Report

The Board shall review will review the annual performance summary report

prepared by the faculty being reviewed and assess the work and progress toward

goals.

b. Performance Feedback from Others

The board might seek feedback regarding the faculty‟s performance from others

as appropriate. In doing so, ensure that procedures are consistent for all faculty in

the department unless special circumstances exist.

c. Preparation of Written Evaluation

The board will prepare a written evaluation regarding the performance of the

faculty being reviewed.

d. Meeting with the faculty

The board will meet with the faculty, provide the review, and discuss review

points.

e. Discussion of Next Year’s Goals and Areas for Growth

The board will engage the employee in a discussion of expectations and goals for

the coming year and areas for professional growth.

f. Central Personnel File

The board will forward a copy of the employee‟s completed performance review

to the Office Establishment for inclusion in the employee‟s personnel file.

Evaluators’

Space



2. The board shall evolve Performance Management Evaluation and

Development System

A. Components: Critical components of the Institute's performance management

system include:

1. Communicating performance expectations to individual employees;

2. Assisting employees in connecting their objectives to the Institute‟s overall

mission through goal setting;

3. Conducting an annual review of employee performance with written

documentation;

4. Measuring the degree to which expectations are met;

5. Addressing areas needing improvement through training, coaching, and other

methods;

6. Encouraging, guiding, and supporting individual development plans;

7. Dealing with substandard performance;

8. Recognizing and rewarding performance;

9. Providing one basis upon which salary increases are determined; and

10. Making decisions, as appropriate, as a function of performance evaluation.

I-I.2.2 Defined rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies etc (5)

(List of the published rules, policies and procedures, year of publications,

awareness among the employees /students, availability on web etc)

The rules and policies regarding recruitment and promotion are as per AICTE

and University norms.

The AICTE pay scales are implemented.

Additional increments are given to staff members who excel in academics and

research.

Recruitment Procedure:

The approval to the sanctioned posts is first taken from the university

Approval from university is then taken for publishing the advertisement to

invite applications.

The advertisement is published at local and national level.

Selection committee duly appointed by management conducts the interviews.

The eligible and selected candidate names are recommended for approval.

Evaluators’

Space



The appointment is done after the due approval from the management.

I-I.2.3 Decentralization in working and grievance addressal system (5)

Decentralization in working:

List of faculty members who are administrators/decision makers for various

assigned jobs:

# NAME DEPARTMENT ROLE

PLANNING AND EVALUATION COMMITTEE

1 Prof D Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman

2 Dr.K.N.Balasubramanya

Murthy

Principal and Director Member

3 Prof Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer &

Member - Governing Body

Member

4 Dr Kavi Mahesh Professor, Department of

Computer Science & Engineering

Member

5 Dr.Koshy George Professor , Department of

Telecommunication Engineering

Convener

GRIEVANCE APPEAL COMMITTEE

1 Dr K.N.Balasubramanya

Murthy


2 Dr.R.Vasudevan Iyer Assistant Professor Physics Convener

3 Prof.Ajoy Kumar Chief Operating Officer & Member

- Governing Body

Member

4 Prof. S S Patil Professor, Mechanical Engineering Member

5 Dr.Keshavan.B.K HOD Electrical Engineering &

Dean-Evaluation

Member

EXAMINATION COMMITTEE



Murthy

Principal and Director Member

3 Prof.Nitin V Pujari Dean –Continuing Education Member

4 Dr.J.Suryaprasad Member of Governing Body Member

5 Prof.V.Krishnamurthy Dean-Academic affairs Convener

Evaluators’

Space



ADMISSION COMMITTEE


2 Mr.Rahul Parmar Dean – Admissions Convener


Murthy

Principal & Director Member

4 Dr.T.R.Seetharam Chair Professor- Thermal

Engineering

Member

5 Prof.M V Sathanarayana Member - Governing Body Member

LIBRARY COMMITTEE

1 Prof.D Jawahar Chief Executive Officer Chairman


Murthy

Principal & Director Member

3 Ms.Gayathri Sen Librarian Convener

4 Dr.Kishore T Kashyap Professor , Mechanical Engineering Member

STUDENT WELFARE COMMITTEE


Murthy

Principal & Director Chairman

2 Dr.V Krishnamurthy Dean - Academic Affairs Member

3 Prof.K S Rohini Professor , Physics Member

4 Dr.Raju Gubbi Professor – Electronics &

Communication

Member

EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES COMMITTEE

1 Prof.Ajoy Kumar COO & Member - Governing Body Chairman

2 Prof.K Chidambara Professor , Computer Science Convener

3 Mr.S.V.Satish Associate Professor – Mechanical

Engineering

Member

4 Mr.V.Krishna Associate Professor – Mechanical

Engineering

Member

5 Mr.M.S.Vinay Director (Sports) Member

Evaluators’

Space



ACADEMIC AUDIT COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Prof.M.Anuradha HOD – Telecommunication

Engineering

Convener

3 Dr.A.Saumya Adikhari Professor –Telecommunication Member

4 Ms.Geetha Shankar Assistant Professor - Mathematics Member

ANTI-RAGGING COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Dr. C.V.Srikrishna Professor – Master of Computer

Applications

Convener

3 Mr. Srinivas R Assistant Professor – Master of


Member

4 Mr. T S Seetharaman Warden – Boys Hostel Member

5 Mr. M.S.Vinay Sports Director Member

ANTI-SEXUAL HARASSMENT COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Dr.K Narashimha Murthy HOD – Mechanical Engineering Convener

3 Prof. V S Chakravarthy HOD – Science & Humanities Member

4 Prof. S S Shylaja HOD – Information Science and

Engineering

Member

5 Ms. M.S.Sunitha Assistant Professor, Electronics

and Communication Engineering

Member

PURCHASE COMMITTEE



Murthy

Principal & Director Convener

3 Prof. Ajoy Kumar COO & Member - Governing

Body

Member

Evaluators’

Space



4 Dr.Venkatesh Vadde Professor – Electronics and


Member

5 Dr.V Raghupathy Professor – Mechanical

Engineering

Member

RESEARCH COMMITTEE


Murthy


2 Dr. A.Srinivas Dean – Research & Development Convener

3 Dr. S.Natarajan Professor – Information Science

and Engineering

Member

4 Dr. C.S.Ramesh Professor – Mechanical

Engineering

Member

5 Dr. R.Muralishankar Professor – Telecommunication

Engineering

Member

BOARD OF APPOINTMENTS AND PERFORMANCE REVIEW



Murthy

Principal and Director Convener

3 Prof. Ajoy Kumar Member - Governing Body Member

4 Dr. J K Suresh VTU-Nominee Member

5 Dr. Jayaraj VTU-Nominee Member

6 Dr. T.R.Seetharam Chair Professor- Thermal

Engineering

Member

7 Dr. K.N.Seetharamu Professor– Thermal Engineering Member

I-I.2.4 Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous information (5)

Dissemination and Availability of institute/program specific information

through the web:

The institute has hosted its own website which is updated as and when required.

The institute and programme specific information is made available to all aspirants

through the web-site.

The web-site URL is: www.pes.edu

Evaluators’

Space

http://www.pes.edu/



I-I.3 Budget allocation and its utilization (10)

(Summary of current financial year‟s budget and the actual expenditures incurred

(exclusively for the College/Institute) for three preceding financial years)

(Figures in Rs. Lakhs)

Item Budgeted

in CFY

Expenses

in CFYm1

Expenses

in CFYm2

Acquisition of land and

new buildings and

infrastructural built-up

45 40 30

Library 50 50 40

Laboratory Equipment 360 330 300

Laboratory Consumables - - -

Teaching and Non-

teaching staff salary 1300 1200 1100

Travel - - -

Others (building rent,

telephone, electricity,

affiliation fees, vehicle M

& R, hospitality and

miscellaneous)

440 400 300

I-I.4 Library (25)

Timings: Academic Working day 8 am to 6 am

Academic Weekend 8 am to 12 pm

Vacation 8 am to 8 pm

I-I.4.2 Availability of a qualified librarian and other staff, Library automation,

online access, networking (5)

# of Lib. Staff 20 # of Lib. Staff with Degree in Lib. 12

Computerization for search, indexing, issue/return records ? Yes

Bar-coding used? Yes

Lib services on internet/intranet? Yes

INDEST or other similar membership ?specify Yes

I-I.4.1 Library space and ambience, timings and usage (5)

Carpet area of Lib. 3,065 sqm Reading Space

750sqm

# of Seats in reading

space: 250

# of Users (issue book) 500 per day # of Users (Reading

space) 250 per day

Evaluators’

Space



I-I.4.3 Variety of titles and the volumes per title (5)

# of Titles ___________________ # of Volumes ___________________

Items

# of New

Titles

added

# of New

Editions

added

# of New

Volumes

added

CFYm2[2007-08] 1859 --- 4086

CFYm1[2008-09] 2893 --- 5210

CFY[2009-10] 2796 --- 4999

I-I.4.4 Journal subscription and internationally acclaimed titles (5)

Items

# of

Technical

Magazines /

Periodicals

# of Total Technical

Journals subscribed

Internationally

acclaimed

titles in

(originals,

reprints) In hard copy In Soft copy

CFYm2[2007-08] 212 104 1532 --

CFYm1[2008-09] 206 103 1532 --

CFY[2009-10] 211 111 1532 --

I-I.4.5 Digital library (5)

Availability of Digital Lib. contents? If available, Yes

# of Courses # of Books 91 Any other ?

Availability of an exclusive server ? Yes

Availability over intranet/internet ? Yes

Availability of exclusive space/room ? Yes

# of Users 50 per day

I-I.5 Academic support units and common facilities for FIRST YEAR Courses (20)

I-I.5.1 Core laboratories (Adequacy of space, number of students per batch, quality

and availability of measuring instruments, laboratory manuals, list of experiments)

(10)

Evaluators’

Space



Core Lab

Description

Space (sq.m) /No.

of Students

No. of

experiments

Quality of

instruments*

Lab

manuals

Physics 180/33 10 Good Available

Chemistry 220/33 12 Good Available

Basic Electrical

Engineering

Laboratory

200/33 10 Good Available

Basic Electronics

Engineering

Laboratory 153/33 12 Good Available

Concepts of Computer

Programming

Laboratory 220/33 10 Good Available

*All labs have sufficient no. of equipments and measuring instruments to carry out all

prescribed experiments. All equipments are maintained in good working conditions.

I-I.5.2 Central computing laboratory (4)

Computing Lab Space

(sq.m)

No. of

Computers

Variety of

SWs Usage/Timings

Lab

Assistance

Central

Computing

Facility

310 100 System and

Application 9 AM to 10 PM Available

System SWs: Windows XP, Vista, Linux, (RHCE4), Novell Netware ETC.

Application SWs: MATLAB, CATIA V5, ANSYS, Auto-CAD, Turbo C++, J-Creator,

IBM Rational Suite, Dot Net, Flash, Xilinx, ETAP, Lab-view, Financial accounting

system, academic monitoring system

Evaluators’

Space



I-I.5.3 Manufacturing practices laboratory (4)

Lab

Description

Space Sq mts

/No. of

Students

No. of

experiments

Quality of

instruments

Lab

Manuals

Mechanical

Engineering

Science practice

200/26 6 Good Provided

I-I.5.4 Language laboratory (2)

Language

Lab

Space/No

Students

Type of

experiments

Quality of

instructions

Guidance/

Learning

Language

Laboratory

60/20 Phonetics

Grammar

Conversations

Group Discussion

Personal Interviews

Public Speaking

Telephonic Skills

Letter Writing and

Curriculum Vitae

Writing

Reporting

Soft Skills

Demonstration

of the

background

Visualization

through audio-

visuals

Performance

Basic study

material is

provided.

Lab manuals

are provided.

Optional

software.

I-I.6 Internet (5)

Internet Provider: Bharat Sanchar Nigam Limited (BSNL)

Band-Width: 100 Mbps

Access Speed: Poor Good Excellent

Evaluators’

Space



Availability:

Availability in an exclusive lab for internet use: Yes No

Availability in most computing labs: Yes No

Availability in departments and other units: Yes No

Availability in faculty rooms: Yes No

I-I.7 Co-curricular and extracurricular activities (10)

I-I.7.1 Co-curricular and extra-curricular activities, e.g., NCC/ NSS, cultural

activities etc. (5)

Not all learning at PESIT is confined to the classroom. Besides curricular activities,

students are engaged in co-curricular and extracurricular activities. This is normally done

by students associations and student chapters. Field trips, co-curricular and extra-

curricular activities provide opportunities for students to explore new fields of interest,

cultivate leadership skills, and learn teamwork. All PESIT students participate in a wide-

range of activities which currently include the production of weekly news letter,

performing arts, participation in programming and quiz contests and paper presentation

contests. Most of these activities are suggested by the students themselves. From

publishing the news letter to running the student council and other associations, the

PESIT students are always engaged in developing a dynamic culture, fostering

collaboration and cooperation.

Co-curricular activities:

Each year there is an abundance of stimulating programs and activities from which

students may select, for provocative and important use of their out of classroom time.

Broadly known as co-curricular activities, these opportunities for involvement are an

integral part of college life, offering students additional avenues in which to explore their

talents, passions and interests. Participating in co-curricular activities, our students

continue to apply what they learn in the classroom to enhance their knowledge and

performance.

Evaluators’

Space



As a part of co-curricular activities, paper presentation contest, quiz contests,

project exhibitions and robotic competitions are organized in the institution and

students are encouraged to participate in such events.

Every year institute arranges national level and university level paper presentation

contest and project competitions. The details are given in Table below.

Industrial visits are arranged every semester for the students to get acquainted

with the industrial environment.

Guest lectures of entrepreneurs are arranged for the motivation of the students.

Training programmes are arranged from various professional trainers.

Events conducted

Atmatrisha

Prakalpa

Ninanada

Infini

Sanskriti

Manage

Science Fest

Extended Week Day activities

Extra Curricular Activities:

Activities undertaken throughout the year:

Publication of news letter

PESIT students publish a newsletter with the objective of establishing

connectivity among the students of University. The newsletter focuses on the

current happenings in the world, campus placements and information on various

entrance examinations for PG admissions.

Sports

Sports week “Infini” is celebrated by organizing intercollegiate sports events like

Long Jump, Volleyball, Basket ball, Table Tennis, Cricket, Chess, and Carom and

winners are awarded medals on Annual Day.

Evaluators’

Space



Performing Arts

Every year, a cultural programme named “Samskriti” is held to encourage

students to participate in performing arts. This program is very useful to bring out

latent talent of students. Various events like singing, playing musical instruments,

drama, monoacting, mimicry, and dance are arranged.

AdventureActivities

Adventure activities such as Trekking, Mountaineering is held for interested

students during vacation.

Literary activities

In order to encourage students to participate in literary activities; the institute

publishes annual magazine Eclat that provides students an opportunity to express

their feelings and showcase their hidden talents in variety of fields like writing

articles and poems, technical articles, painting and photography skills.

Other Activities

Personality Development and Yoga/Meditation are held to enlighten the students

about a spiritual part of growth in themselves. Such activities are held on a

regular basis that ensures in the holistic development in the students.

I-I.7.2 Sports grounds and facilities (5)

The institution has a huge sports ground. There are well equipped gym and sports

kits. Students are encouraged to participate in various zonal and inter-zonal tournaments;

they are paid daily allowances and travelling expenses. Students are provided with

various sports kits and equipments. They participate in inter collegiate and inter

University matches. Annual Sports Meet is celebrated every year with various sports

events like Long Jump, Volleyball, Table Tennis, Cricket, Chess, and Carom etc.

Institute sport ground has following facilities:

Cricket ground

Volleyball court

Football ground

Basket ball court [Indoor & Outdoor]

Evaluators’

Space



Granite Chess Park

Indoor shuttle courts

Table Tennis

Gymnasium

To manage all sport activities, a well qualified physical education Director is appointed.

The institute has a well equipped gym facility. The various equipments available are

listed below:

S. N. Equipment QTY

1 Nine Station Multi-gym 01

2 Squat Machine 01

3 Smith Machine 01

4 T – Bar 01

5 Seated Calf Machine 01

6 Abdominal Machine 01

7 Incline Bench 01

8 Decline Bench 01

9 Flat Bench 01

10 H-Bar 01

11 Triceps Bar 01

I-I.8 Career guidance, Training, placement and Entrepreneurship cell (15)

I-I.8.1 Effective career guidance services including counseling for higher studies (5)

An important part of the mission of the Institute is to improve the quality of the

graduate student experience. To that end, we spend a considerable amount of time talking

with students about their goals, concerns, and suggestions for improving their experience.

The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve the

needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community. PESIT offers career

guidance on all aspects of career planning, job searching, and post-graduate studies. We

provide individual counseling through scheduled appointments. In career services, we

work with students and alumni towards the following goals:

Evaluators’

Space



Broad exploration of various career options

Pursuing post graduate studies

Finding work that is consonant with one‟s values, such as long-term economic

stability, intellectual challenge, professional prestige, working toward a

sustainable environment, and/or balancing family and work.

These goals are achieved through following:

Maintain i.e, substantial databases of jobs, part-time and full-time post-graduate

programmes, and help students prepare for their job search through assistance

with resumes and interviewing practice.

Assisting students with the application process to post-graduate and professional

schools, including advising on optimal application strategies, reviewing personal

statements.

The institute library is resourced with up-to-date resources on career fields, post-

graduate programs and information on potential employers.

We bring alumni to campus to participate in seminars on career fields and post-

graduate study, and we also manage a network of alumni career advisors who

have agreed to talk to our students.

We run on-campus recruiting program through which employers come to

represent their organizations to our students, as well as interview them for

permanent positions.

Employers often visit our campus to speak with students in small groups.

Sometimes the sessions are planned for students participating in on-campus

recruiting programmes.

We encourage students to try new techniques and expand their skills.

We let students know that mistakes lead to better learning. Share a less-than-

successful experience of your own and what it taught you.

We encourage students to appear for GATE and other such examinations and

provide special guidance.

We reassure students of their skills and abilities to succeed.

We teach students how to break large scholarly tasks into smaller, more

manageable ones to avoid becoming overwhelmed.

Evaluators’

Space



I-I.8.2 Training and placement facility with training-n-placement officer (TPO),

industry interaction for training/internship/placement (5)

The Institute has established a Training and Placement Cell headed by Training and

Placement Officer of Assistant Professor Grade. The activities of the Cell Includes:

Strengthen Industry-Institute Interaction.

To prepare a comprehensive list of industries.

To visit industries frequently to explore possibilities of students recruitment

through campus interviews

To prepare list of students along with bio-data eligible for various interviews.

To conduct programmes for students in areas like personality development,

communication skills with help of HRD Committee.

To help students to get vocational training in industries during vacation.

To make facilities available for the smooth conduct of interviews by visiting

industry personnel.

To prepare alumni records and update them.

To arrange Alumni meet twice every year on Jan 26th & Aug 15

th.

PRE-PLACEMENT ACTIVITY

PROFILING

This is a unique initiative by the Departments aimed at preparing the students for their

placements. This process was first held for the students of the 2002-2006 graduating

batch. The whole process is held in two phases.

The first phase is a precursor to the tier three placements {for the companies offering

packages below three lakhs per annum). This phase started with a string of written tests.

An aptitude test, a vocabulary test, and a psychometric test is conducted initially. Based

on the results of this test, top hundred students are listed. Later a mock group discussion

involving volunteers from this list and mock interviews for the top ten students are

conducted, in the presence of the rest of the students. As a part of this phase, the students

are profiled individually. Profiling sessions are held over a course of two months, before

the start of the first tier one placements. These are held after the college hours on

weekdays and through the day during weekends. The sessions are around five hours each,

and each session involves the HOD, handling around two to ten students. The sessions

Evaluators’

Space



starts with a brief icebreaking session and then later goes on to assess the students, giving

tips regarding the placements, and ends with interviews to the individual students. The

sessions end with a review of the students' performance and a general advice regarding

areas of improvement and study materials. The second phase is mainly aimed at

addressing the tier two placements (for companies offering compensation of three to five

lakhs per annum). This phase is spearheaded by the KRPs . The students are first carried

through sessions that dealt with key points in various subjects and then the students are

interviewed on the same topics. This process is carried out after a substantial number of

students are placed in tier one companies, during the semester holidays after the sixth

semester.

BUDDY SYSTEM

This system is another unique initiative by the PESIT to prepare the students for the

placements. The system consists of volunteers from among the final year students, who

mentor the students of pre - final year for placements. The volunteers will be divided into

groups of two and each group has been assigned the responsibility of mentoring six to

eight students. The main objectives of this system are:

To conduct the profiling session for an extended period of time of one year and

thus identify various strong points of each student to develop them and identify various

shortcomings of the students to eliminate them.

To increase the interaction among senior and junior students in a constructive

manner, in a way that will benefit both.

A very comprehensive plan will be drawn to achieve these aims. The odd semester is

usually been devoted mainly to address the aptitude, vocabulary and human resource

aspects of a placement. Thus, in the initial months, the buddies of each final year student

will be given tests in aptitude and English. Also they will be prepared by their buddies to

face interviews and to participate in group discussions. At the end of the semester, a three

hour test to review the performance of each student will be conducted. The even

semesters will concentrate more on addressing the technical capabilities of the students.

These will be conducted under the guidance of the able faculties of the department. The

process will also help each student identifying his or her area of interest, thus helping in

deciding the type of companies that he or she has to aspire for. The buddy system also

hopes to help the students interact with each other in such a way that they lead to new

ideas that may develop into projects and papers.

Evaluators’

Space



I-I.8.3 Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility (5)

Entrepreneurs assemble resources including innovations, finance and business

acumen in an effort to transform innovations into economic goods. This may result in

new organizations or may be part of revitalizing mature organizations in response to a

perceived opportunity. The most obvious form of entrepreneurship is that of starting new

businesses; however, in recent years, the term has been extended to include social and

political forms of entrepreneurial activity. Given entrepreneurship's potential to support

economic growth, it is the policy goal of our institute to develop a culture of

entrepreneurial thinking. This is done by integrating entrepreneurship into education

system. The Entrepreneurship and Incubation centre at PESIT fosters creativity and

offers support in translating ideas to businesses. The aim is to nurture the spirit of

entrepreneurship among talented and ambitious students. The Incubation Centre offers

on-site business facilities to aid entrepreneurship among students. The facilities on

campus include office space, computers, printers, communication systems, and Internet

connectivity etc. It also provides a meeting room for discussion, to propel ideas and to

network.

Professional Mentoring and Business Advice:

The incubation centre would enable students to reshape their business plans to

commercial models and to make it a success. The centre would help students:

To look in to the procedures, methodology, access funding, mentoring among

other activities which are vital to setting up and sustain a business.

Provide valuable management and consultancy advice that they will almost

certainly need to guide them through the entire how's, why's, what's and when's of

business.

Impart the hand holding support that most start-ups need, to enable them to move

forward and experiment with business models.

The Incubation Centre also has connections with organizations and individuals, to

encourage students and help them draw on a bigger canvas and facilitate sources of

funding for their projects. It provides a business environment, to think and act like

entrepreneur. This centre will bring together student innovators, entrepreneurs, Alumni,

venture capitalist, bankers, subject experts and mentors to provide an ecosystem that will

help students understand the processes and policies related to commercializing their

business plans.

Evaluators’

Space

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Organization

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Business



I-I.9 Safety norms and checks (5)

(Specify how safety norms and checks carried out in buildings, laboratories (e.g. those

using hazardous chemicals, high voltages etc.) and other critical installations. Comment

on how checks are conducted and how frequently are these carried out.)

1) Earthquake resistance: The building has been designed to resist earthquake

(ductility provisions)

2) Fire Safety norms and Checks:

As per Indian standard code (IS 14435: 1997) the building complies with

following norms

Sufficient fire extinguishers are provided. (Total 10)

Non-combustible materials used for construction and staircase walls with

minimum 2h rating.

Exit signs and floor indication boards are fixed at strategic locations.

All passageways are 3 m wide and staircase width is minimum 1.7 m and 4.8

m.

3) Chemistry Laboratory:

Eye flush equipment, Fire extinguisher is provided.

Posters for proper use are displayed.

Separate room for storing and preparing of hazardous chemicals.

Safe disposal of chemicals.

4) Electrical equipments:

Electricity Generator housed out of institute building.

MCBs are used at all electrical installations.

Sufficient Earth connections are provided ( 3 for institute building and 2 for

workshop)

5) Workshops:

All rotating part machines are provided with protective guards.

List of Do‟s and Don‟ts displayed for student‟s information.

It has been made mandatory to wear aprons.

Evaluators’

Space



CHECKS ON SAFETY NORMS

S. N. Details of Check Frequency

1 All electrical equipments and installations are checked at

start of semester

Half

Yearly

2 All electrical & mechanical machines are inspected at start &

mid semester Quarterly

3 Fire extinguishers are recharged after expiry date of

constituents. -

4 Discharge of waste chemicals is done only after pH

neutralization -

5 Earthings are checked for conductivity. Annually

I-I.10 Emergency medical care and first-aid (10)

I-I.10.1 Medical staff to provide first-aid and medical help in emergency:

Criterion II: Evaluation and Teaching-Learning Process

II-I.1 Evaluation system (40)

II-I.1.1 Published schedule in academic calendar for assignments/mid-semester

tests, distribution of corrected scripts (10)

Academic Calendar:

Academic calendar is prepared and published prior to beginning of each academic

year. The activity calendar shows the start and end of each semester stating various

programmes to be conducted, the internal evaluation schedule and the tentative schedule

of external evaluation. The start and end of each semester is prescribed by the university.

Evaluators’

Space



P.E.S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, BANGALORE-85.

C A L E N D A R O F E V E N T S

BE – I Semester (Autonomous Scheme) Session: Aug’10 – Jan’11

Week

No Month

Day No. of

working

days

Activities Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat

1. Aug/Sept 30 31

EWD 1 2

3

FAM 4 6

4th

– Thur

TT

2. Sept 6 7

EWD 8 9

10

H

11

H 4

10th

–

Ramzan

11th

– Ganesh

Chaturthi

3. Sept 13 14

EWD 15 16 17 18 6

18th

- Wed

TT

4. Sept 20 21

EWD 22 23 24

25

PTM 6

25th

– Mon

TT

5. Sept/Oct 27 28

EWD

29

CCM 30 1

2

H 5

2nd

– Gandhi

Jayanthi

6. Oct 4 5 6 7

H 8 9 4

7th

–

Mahalaya

Amavasya

7. Oct 11

T1

12

T1

13

T1

14

T1

15

T1

16

H 5

T1 – Test 1

week(10th –

15th Oct)

16th

–

Ayudha

Pooja

8. Oct 18 19

EWD

20

BBV

21

BBV

22

BBV 23 6

23rd

– Mon

TT

9. Oct 25 26

EWD 27 28

29

ASD 30 6

30th

– Wed

TT

10. Nov 1

H

2

EWD

3

CCM 4

5

H 6 3

1st –

Kannada

Rajyotsava

5th

– Naraka

Chaturdashi

11. Nov 8

Q

9

Q

EWD

10

Q

11

Q

12

Q

13

Q

PTM

6

13th

– Fri TT

Q – Quiz

week

12. Nov 15 16 17

H

18

QPV

19

QPV 20 5

17th

– Bakrid

20th

– Fri TT

Evaluators’

Space



13. Nov 22 23 24

H 25

26

FAM 27 4

24th

–

Kanakadas

Jayanthi

14. Nov/ Dec 29

T2

30

T2

1

T2

2

T2

3

T2

4

T2 5

T2- Test2

week

15. Dec 6 7

BBV

8

BB

V

9

BB

V

10

LW

D

11 5

Withdr

awal of

Courses

16. Dec 13 14

15

FAS

D

16

IOH

17

H

18

IOH

Study

holidays

IOH- Issue

of Hall

Tickets

17. Dec 20 21 22 23 24 25

H

Theory

Exams

25th

–

Chrismas

18. Dec/Jan 27 28 29 30 31 1

19. Jan 3 4 5 6 7 8 Practic

al Exams

H : Holiday BBV: Blue Book Verification (3.45 to 4.45PM)

EWD: Extended Working Day FAM: Faculty Advisors‟ Meeting

PTM: Parents Teachers meet QPV: Quiz Paper Verification

CCM: Class Committee Meeting LWD: Last working Day

ASD: Attendance & Sessional marks display FASD: Final

attendance & Sessional marks display PTM: Parents Teachers Meet

Evaluators’

Space





BE II, IV, VI Semester (Autonomous scheme) Session: Jan – May 2011

Wee

k No

Mont

h

Day No.

of

wor

king

days

Activities Mon Tue

We

d Thu Fri Sat

1. Jan 17 18 19 20

21

FA

M

22 5

17th

-

Commence

ment of

classes,

course

registration

2. Jan 24

25

EW

D

26

H 27 28 29 4

26th

– Republic

day

3. Feb 31

1

EW

D

2 3 4

5

PT

M 5

1st – Wed TT

Course

withdrawal

4. Feb 7

8

EW

D

9 10 11 12 5 12

th, 13

th –Aatma

Trisha

5. Feb 14

15

EW

D

16

H 17

18

CC

M

19 4

16th

– Id-Milad

19th

– Science

Fest

6. Feb 21

22

EW

D

23 24 25 26 5

7. Feb/M

ar

28

T1

1

T1

2

H

3

T1

4

T1

5

T1 5

T1 – Test1

2nd

-

Mahashivar

atri

8. Mar 7

BBV

8

EW

D

9

BB

V

10

BB

V

11

ASD 12 5

9. Mar 14

15

EW

D

16 17

18

CC

M

19 5

10. Mar 21

22

EW

D

23 24 25

26

PT

M

5

11. Mar/A

pr 28

29

EW

D

30 31

1

CC

M

2 5

Evaluators’

Space



12. Apr 4

H

5

EWD

6

FA

M

7

LT

8

LT 9 5

4th

Chandramana

Ugadi

LT - Lab Test

(during respective

lab sessions)

13. Apr 11

LT

12

LT

13

LT

14

H

15

CH

16

H 3

14th

Dr. Ambedkar

Jayanthi

15t

Compensatory

Holiday

16th

Mahaveer

Jayanti

LT- Lab Test

(during respective

lab sessions)

14. Apr 18

T2

19

T2

20

T2

21

T2

22

H

23

T

2

5

T2 – Test 2 and

Quiz

22nd

– Good

Friday

15. Apr 25 26 27

BBV

28

BBV

29

LWD 30 5

LWD- Last

Working Day

16. May 2 3

4

FAS

D

5

IOH

6

H

7

I

O

H

Study Holidays

IOH – Issue of

Hall Tickets

6th

– Basava

Jayanthi

17. May 9 10 11 12 13 14 Theory Exams

18. May 16 17 18 19 20 21

19. May 23 24 25 26 27 28 Practical

Exams/Seminar

for special topics

20. May/Ju

ne 30 31 1 2 3 4

30th

May to 11th

June-vacation

8th

-

Announcement of

Results

9th

– 11th

Registration for

summer term

13th

-

Commencement

of Summer term

13th

June to 12th

Aug – Mandatory

training for non

summer term

students

21. June 6 7

8

AO

R

9 10 11

22. June 13 14 15 16 17 18

23. June 20 21 22 23 24 25

24. June/Ju

ly 27 28 29 30 1 2

25. July 4 5 6 7 8 9

26. July 11 12 13 14 15 16

27. July 18 19 20 21 22 23

28. July 25 26 27 28 29 30

29. Aug 1 2 3 4 5 6

30. Aug 8 9 10 11 12 13 Exams and

Evaluation

Evaluators’

Space



II-I.1.2 Maintenance of Course files – class deliveries and their closeness and

mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15)

(Produce sample (best and average quality) course files, handouts showing course

deliveries mapped with the identified PEOs. In case of an affiliated college, there may be

a provision of teaching additional topics and supplementary tests/examinations in order

to achieve the identified PEOs. This exercise is aimed at to assess the provision and

ability of the college to do the above in order to achieve the stated PEOs.)

Departmental Central academic monitoring cells are formed to monitor the maintenance

of course files and class deliveries. This cell is headed by HOD and class monitors for

each class are the members of the cell. This cell provides the guidelines for preparation

of course files, planning of weekly tests and maintenance of attendance records.

Computerized academic monitoring system is in place.

Maintenance of Course Files:

For each course, a course file is prepared by the concerned faculty. The course file

consists of following items.

Teaching plan:

Teaching plans for each and every course are prepared by the faculty. Whole

syllabus is divided into eight equal units and 52 lectures as per the teaching

scheme prescribed by the university.

The course objectives are defined for each course in line with the PEOs.

Lesson plan:

Lesson plans are prepared for each lecture in the teaching plan. The lesson plan

encompasses the aim, rationale, learning outcomes and the assessment of

outcomes. A sample lesson plan Proforma is given below.

Sample lesson plan Proforma:


Department of …….

LESSON PLAN

Evaluators’

Space



Course Code: No.Hours/Week: 4

Course Title:

Course Coordinator: Prof.

Classes Syllabus Covered

Cumulative of

syllabus covered in

%

1-7 Module 1 12.5

8-14 Module 2 25

15-21 Module 3 37.5

22-28 Module 4 50

29-35 Module 5 62.5

36-42 Module 6 75

43-49 Module 7 87.5

50-56 Module 8 100

Text Books:

1.

2.

Reference Books:

1.

2.

Question Bank

3 Marks questions

7 Marks questions

10 Marks questions

II-I.1.3 Quality of problems in assignments/tests/semester examinations and their

closeness and mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15)

Produce sample (best and average quality) assignment sheets, lab sheets,

test/examination question papers along with model solutions to assess how the

PEOs are achieved by examining students‟ knowledge through assignments and

examinations. In case of an affiliated college, there may be a provision of

additional/supplementary tests/examinations to examine the additional subject

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space



topics covered to achieve the identified PEOs.

This exercise is aimed at to assess the provision and ability of the college to do the

above in order to achieve the stated PEOs.

Question Bank

Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course

objectives and considering the nature of the university question papers. The

previous question papers of University are also maintained in the course files.

Transparencies and PPTs are included as per the lesson plan requirement.

Assignment questions and test question papers along with model solutions are

included in the course files.

Class Deliveries:

Monitoring of class deliveries as per the time table is done by the monitoring cell.

Monthly review of syllabus coverage is conducted and necessary corrective

measures are suggested.

The attendance of students is monitored continuously and defaulter students are

counseled.

Academic diaries are provided to maintain the attendance record for each theory/

laboratory course and the performance of students in tests.

The student attendance along with test performance is communicated to parents

by the monitoring cell.

Additional curriculum:

Additional curriculums are created for each programme to meet its PEOs.

The implementation of this curriculum in terms of course files, class deliveries

and assessment is monitored by the monitoring cell.

II-I.1.3 Quality of problems in assignments/tests/semester examinations and their

closeness and mapping with Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (15)

(Produce sample (best and average quality) assignment sheets, lab sheets,

test/examination question papers along with model solutions to assess how the PEOs are

achieved by examining students‟ knowledge through assignments and examinations. In

case of an affiliated college, there may be a provision of additional/supplementary

tests/examinations to examine the additional subject topics covered to achieve the

identified PEOs.)

Evaluators’

Space



In order to assess the achievement of identified programme educational objectives of

each programme, the institute has following mechanisms in place:

Assignments:

Question banks are prepared for each topic in the course based on the course

objectives and considering the nature of the university question papers.

Assignment problems are chosen from such question banks.

Model solutions for assignment problems are prepared by concerned faculty.

Continuous assessment system is implemented for assessment of assignments.

Laboratory Work:

Laboratory plans are prepared for each laboratory course. This plan includes

number of experiments as prescribed in the curriculum. Apart from this, two

additional experiments/case studies are included in the plan.

Laboratory manuals are prepared for all the experiments in the plan and are

provided to the students at the time of practical.

At the end of each experiment few assignment questions/problems are given.

Continuous assessment system is also implemented for assessment of laboratory

work. The assessment is done on the basis of timely submission of laboratory

sheets, understanding of the experiment through oral questions and participation

in performing the experiment. Neatness of the laboratory sheet is also given

weightage in the assessment.

Weekly tests:

Besides the university examinations additional weekly tests are conducted to

achieve the identified PEOs.

Weekly tests are planned and conducted on every Friday. The schedule of such

tests is published in the academic calendar.

Three tests are scheduled per course in a semester.

Test question papers are set based on the question banks available.

Test papers are assessed based on the model solutions.

Corrected scripts are distributed to students and results are declared within one

week.

Evaluators’

Space



The test results are also communicated to parents.

Assessment of additional curriculum:

Institute has created and implemented an additional curriculum for each

programme.

Institute has a provision of additional tests/examinations to examine the

additional subject topics covered in the additional curriculum to achieve the

identified PEOs.

At the end of the additional course, the tests are conducted for assessment of the

course objectives.

Test papers are assessed on the basis of model solutions and the corrected scripts

are distributed to students.

II-I.2 Tutorial classes/ remedial classes/ mentoring (20)

II-I.2.1 Tutorial classes to address personal level doubts and queries: size of tutorial

classes, hours per subject in timetable (10)

Provision of tutorial classes in the time table: Yes No

Tutorial sheets: Yes No

Tutorial classes taken by: Faculty/Teaching Assistants/Senior students/others:

No. of tutorial classes per subject:01 per week No. of students:20 per tutorial class

No. of subjects with tutorials: 1st year: 04 2nd year:07 3rd year:05 4th year: 08

II-I.2.2 Remedial classes and additional make-up tests to help academically weaker

students: list of remedial classes, schedule of classes/tests and students’ lists

(5)

Remedial Classes:

Provision of remedial classes in the time table Yes No

No. of subjects having remedial classes:

02 Subjects per course out of total: 05 (Avg.) subjects per semester per course

No. of students having remedial classes:

20% (Avg.) students out of total students in a semester for a course

No. of hours of remedial classes:

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space



01 per subject per week

Make-up Tests:

Provision of makeup tests in academic calendar: Yes No

No. of subjects having make-up tests:

02 Subjects per course out of total: 05 (Avg.) subjects per semester per course

No. of students having make-up tests:

20% (Avg.) students out of total students in a semester for a course

No. of hours of makeup tests:

01 per subject per week

II-I.2.3 Mentoring system to help at individual levels (5)

The Institute is working towards enhancing the institutional culture to better serve

the needs of an ever-changing and dynamic learning community. Effective mentoring

begins with the faculty. When it comes to academic success and persistence, there is no

substitute for a healthy relationship between faculty and students.

Mentoring and Guidance provides encouragement to the students as under:

Encourage students to discuss their ideas.

Encourage students to try new techniques and expand their skills.

Let students know that mistakes lead to better learning. Share a less-than-

successful experience of your own and what it taught you.

Reassure students of their skills and abilities to succeed.

Teach students how to break large scholarly tasks into smaller, more manageable

ones to avoid becoming overwhelmed.

Mentoring system to help at individual levels:

There are minimum twelve faculties in each program working as guardians / mentors

for the students. Each faculty looks after 15 students. The faculty monitors their progress

and reports to In-charge of counseling cell. This mentoring is for over all development of

the student. Professional guidance is provided by arranging lectures of eminent

personalities from academics, industry and social workers. Lectures of faculty from other

institutions are organized. A counseling sheet is maintained by faculty where all details

of the students of his/her group are recorded. History cards of the students are prepared in



which attendance, examination marks and family details are recorded. The same card is

continued till the student completes his graduation.

Type of Mentoring: Professional Guidance/Career advancement/Course work

specific/Lab specific/Total development (Mentoring covers all types of guidance)

No. of faculty mentors: 12 per programme No. of students per

mentor: 15

Frequency of meeting: Weekly/Monthly/No. per semester/Need based/other

II-I.3 Teaching evaluation process: Feedback system (30)

II-I.3.1 Design of Proforma and process of feedback evaluation (5)

No. of feedback items: 07 No. of levels: 04

Space for descriptive feedback/suggestions: No

Any consistency check: Yes No

Any performance/attendance profile: No

Frequency of feedback collection: Twice in a semester

Feedback collection: Hard-copy/Web-based

II-I.3.2 Feedback analysis and percentage of students’ participation (5)

Feedback collected for all courses: Yes

No

The feedback collection process:

Who collects the feedback?

Feed back forms are given to student CR who distributes them amongst all

students. The forms are again collected by the administrative staff of the

departments at the end of the semester and are given back to the HOD.

When feedback is collected?

In the mid of the semester

Percentage of students participating:

Hundred percent students present at that time

The feedback analysis process:

Is this done manually?

Evaluators’

Space

Evaluators’

Space



Yes

What metrics are calculated?

Percentage of „E‟, Vg‟, „G‟, „F‟ and „A‟ is calculated

What is inferred from the metrics?

If percentage of „Excellent‟ (E) comment is high, then it indicates that the rapport

between teacher and students is nice and the students understand the teaching.

High percentage of „very good‟ (Vg) and „good‟ (G) indicates efforts are being

taken by the faculty and still there is a scope for improvement.

High percentage of „fair‟ (F) indicates less involvement of the faculty and poor

rapport with the students. The faculty needs to do hard work and counseling is

needed from senior faculty.

„A‟ stands for Average.

How are the comments used?

The comments are analyzed by the concerned HOD and are discussed with the concerned

faculty individually. Suggestions for improvement in teaching performance are given if

required.

II-I.3.3. System of reward / corrective measures etc. (10)

Basis of reward/corrective measures:

System of Reward:

Best performing faculty based on the feedback received from the students is

rewarded by issuing a letter of appreciation. Performance rating of faculty through

student feedback system is one of the factors in evaluating the annual performance of the

faculty. Based on the annual performance of the faculty the annual increments are

released.

Corrective Measures:

The faculties performing below average are asked for written explanation and

counseled to improve their performance in future.

Were extraneous factors like hard/soft attitude of the instructor considered? Yes

No

Was result considered Yes No

Evaluators’

Space



No. of awards: in CAY: 18 in CAYm1:18 in CAYm2:18

No. of corrective action: in CAY: 02 in CAYm1: 04 in CAYm2:

03

II-I.3.3 Any feedback mechanism from alumni, Parents and industry (10)

The mechanism of feedback collection and analysis:

The institute has a mechanism for collection of feedback from alumni, parents and

industry. Every year parents meet is arranged to discuss on issues like teaching learning

process, infrastructural facilities, performance of their wards and placement activity.

Parents are allowed to give feedback orally and in written form. A feedback form is

developed for this purpose. Institute has a registered alumni cell in place. Alumni meet is

arranged every three years to interact and receive constructive suggestions for future

institutional development and to enhance industry-institute interaction and the placement

activity. At the time of meet feedback is taken in written form. Feed back is also received

through e-mail. Feedback from the industry is also collected where our alumni is

working.

No. of feedback received: in CAY: 50 in CAYm1:30 in CAYm2:20

Typical corrective actions:

The feedback received is analyzed and the suggestions/comments are divided into

following categories:

Teaching-Learning process development

Infrastructural Development

Curriculum development

Amenities and other facilities

Based on the suggestions a time bound action plan is prepared and executed.

II-I.4 Self Learning and Learning beyond syllabus (20)

II-I.4.1 Generation of self-learning facilities and motivation (10)

Self-learning is promoted in the institute by generating self-learning facilities under

Evaluators’

Space



various modes. Students are encouraged for self-learning by personal counseling and

organizing various contests. Following are the various modes of self-learning and

facilities created therein.

Web-based Learning:

The Internet is an open information system in which various sources of information,

media and materials such as texts, images, video sequences can be linked together in

diverse ways to form so-called self-learning environments. Internet offers new

possibilities to structure, represent, adapt and integrate various learning content and

materials. Furthermore, due to its interactivity, learners can process the material in

accordance with their individual preferences and strategies at any time and from any

place provided an internet connection is available. They may select and examine from a

large pool of information only those pieces necessary to meet their learning objectives.

Hence, the potential of the Internet self-learning mode is considered to be very high. The

institute has created Central internet facility with 100 Mbps leased line and 100 computer

terminals facility to promote and motivate students to self-learning.

Learning with Multi-media:

Availability of course material on intra-net

Digital library facility

Language lab facility

Availability of video lectures in CD form

LCD projectors for presentation

Classroom Presentations:

Allowing students to prepare and present topics from curriculum

Arranging presentation on non-technical topics

Technical Symposiums:

Motivating students to participate in inter-college events for paper presentation

and project exhibitions

II-I.4.2 Availability of learning beyond syllabus contents and promotion (10)

In order to meet the stated PEOs of each programme, an additional curriculum is

designed and implemented. The programme specific details of additional curriculum are

given below:

Evaluators’

Space



First Year Common Courses:

Sem/ Year

Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

I MS Office 02 20

II Group Presentation 02 20

Mechanical Engineering:

Sem/

Year Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

III Soft skill development 02 20

IV Paper Writing and Paper presentation

skills

02 20

V Introduction to ANSYS 02 20

VI Interview Techniques 02 20

VII Value Education 02 20

VIII KPSC, UPSC, GRE, TOFEL, GATE

Other Exam Preparation

02 20

Electronics and communications Engineering:

Sem/

Year Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

III Soft skills development and Spoken

English

02 20

IV PCB Design

GD & Aptitude Test

02 20

V Crash Course on VLSI & Embedded

System Design

02 20

VI GATE/GRE Preparation

Verilog Simulation

02 20

VII Crash Course on VLSI & Embedded

System Design

Demonstration of satellite Trainer Kit

02 20

VIII PC Maintenance & Networking 02 20

Information Science Engineering:

Sem/

Year Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

Evaluators’

Space



III Macromedia Flash 02 06

IV Linux Operating System 02 06

V Linux Wizards 02 06

VI General Proficiency - I 02 06

VII Object Oriented Analysis and Design using

UML

02 14

VIII General Proficiency - II 02 06

Computer Science and Engineering:

Sem/

Year Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

III Spoken English 02 20

IV Awareness of Internet & Computer

Networking 02 20

V PC Hardware Maintenance 02 20

VI GATE preparation 02 20

VII Interview Techniques 02 20

VIII Software Testing 02 20

Electrical & Electronics Engineering:

Sem/

Year Topics

Teaching

(Hrs) per

Week

Total(Hrs)

III Spoken and Written English 02 24

IV MS Windows, MS Office 02 24

V Journal Paper Writing 02 24

VI GATE, IES Preparation 02 24

VII GATE, IES Preparation 02 24

VIII General Proficiency 02 24

STUDENT DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITY

TOTAL STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM

Evaluators’

Space



The Total Student Development Program (TSDP) focuses on every aspect of student

personality, helping them develop interpersonal, technical and business skills.

Interpersonal Skill Development

Creativity, lateral thinking and communication / people management skills are essential

components for progress in any sphere. Students are encouraged to develop these through

goal setting exercises, group discussions, mock interviews and presentations. Interested

students can also learn French / German / Japanese on campus.

Technical Skill Development

The depth of technical skills that students develop, depend to a great extent on the course

they have chosen. However, all students are given a conceptual grounding in core skills

and application orientation through real - time projects to ensure their skills are

concurrent with market needs. This is done by in-house faculty and Industries who have

signed an MOD under Industry-Institute Partnership.

Business Skill Development

All students are taught essential business skills through industry interaction as well as

innovative channels like Marketing and Finance clubs. We believe that this training will

stand them in good stead when they make the transition from employee to employer

GIFTED STUDENT DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM (GSDP)

GSDP is a unique program that brings student achievers to the forefront and helps them

realize their potential.

• An entrance test for GSDP is held once a year.

• Students who qualify must then go through interviews and group discussions.

• Both the test and the interviews are conducted by alumni who have been part of GSDP

themselves.

• Students who finally make the GSDP shortlist benefit from an intensive training

program conducted by some of the most respected academic minds.

• This rigorous training includes conceptual skill development, application orientation

and project work. The course hones the entire gamut of critical skills that gifted students

require and gives them an edge that helps them stay ahead always.

STUDENT ACADEMIC SUPPORT PROGRAM (SASP)

SASP is a program for the students who are academically weak. This program is aimed

on the five percent of the students who generally don't do well in the examinations.

Students under this program are selected based on their performances in their previous

Evaluators’

Space



examinations. Special coaching is then given for these students so that their performance

in the university examinations is better.

STUDENT ASSISTANTSHIP PROGRAM

• In each class, students are given opportunity to become Teaching Assistant (TA) for

the faculty members. One TA is allotted for every faculty.

• Responsibilities of a TA are:

o to help the faculty in preparing teaching material

o to assist faculty in research / projects

o to collect technical information as required by the faculty

o to give seminars as required by the faculty

o any other assistance requested by the faculty

• One of the faculty members is designated as SAP coordinator

• TAs are selected based on their academic record and after conducting a written test

• The progress of the TA is monitored

• Incentives are given to TAs based on their performance

• The regular programs briefed earlier, namely TSDP, GSDP, SAP & SASP are the key

processes for the multi dimensional development of the students

• Deserving students are encouraged to participate in the national and international

conferences, seminars, workshops to exhibit their technical talents

• Student events are conducted to encourage co-curricular and extracurricular talents.

Intra-college and inter-college contests are arranged

• As an example, a forum for light music has been created. Every Tuesday, for 90

minutes, music rehearsals is done.

STUDENT COUNSELING / MENTOR1NG

Apart from the regular class teachers, a student counselor has been designated to counsel

the students who have problems in getting success in their education career.

Innovative efforts are put to:

o understand the students

o motivate the students

o bring in to the right track, in case, they are moving out of track

o to create interest in studies

II-I.5 Faculty Ratio and qualification for FIRST YEAR Common Courses (25)

List of faculty members teaching first year courses:

First Semester: Academic Year 2008-09

Evaluators’

Space



Department of Science and Humanities

S.no Name DOB Designa

tion

Qualifications Date Of

Joining UG PG Ph.D

1

Ms Vyajanthimala

S Chakravathi 05.07.1953 Prof B.SC M.Sc -- 05.10.1988

2 Dr. C.D.Satish 01.06.1964 Prof B.Sc MSc Ph.D 24.10.2005

3 Ms.K S Rohini 06.01.1963 Prof B.Sc M.Sc -- 24.09.1990

4

Dr. S.

Radhakrishna 11.01.1955 Prof

B.Sc.

M.Sc

. Ph.D 15.03.2006

5 Dr.Leela V 08.02.1965 Prof B.Sc

M.Sc

Ph.D 21.06.2010

M

Phil

6 Dr.Hamsapriye 12.04.1969 Prof B.Sc M.Sc Ph.D 23.07.2010

7 Dr S Akila 01.08.1954 Prof B.Sc M.Sc Ph.D 09.08.2010

8 Ms Renna Sultana 25.02.1965

Asst

Prof BSC M.Sc -- 26.10.1995

9

Dr.M.Veerabhadra

swamy 27.09.1969

Asst

Prof B.Sc M.Sc Ph.D 19.02.2009

10

Ms Geetha

Shankar 05.06.1966

Asst

Prof BSc

M.Sc

-- 16.10.2000

M

Phil

11

Dr. R. Vasudevan

Iyer 18.12.1968

Asst

Prof B.Sc

M.S

C Ph.D 01.08.2007

12

Dr. Lata

Pasupulety 25.08.1966

Asst


13 Dr.N.Anitha 20.04.1977

Asst


14 Dr. K. E. Ganesh 31.12.1977 Sr Lect

B.Sc.

M.Sc

. Ph.D 11.08.2006

15

Dr.B.A.Kanchan

Garg 13.03.1973 Sr Lect B.Sc M.Sc Ph.D 02.06.2008

16 Mr.Divakara S 20.07.1978 Sr Lect B.Sc M.Sc -- 20.10.2010

17

Mr K

Raghavendra Rao 27.11.1976 Sr Lect B.Sc. M.Sc -- 03.10.2000

18

Dr.K.R.Nagabhus

hana 04.04.1980 Sr. Lect B.Sc M.Sc Ph.D 08.08.2008

19 Ms. Aparna.B.S. 26.05.1975 Sr Lect B.Sc M.Sc -- 05.04.2006

20 Mr Narahari N 25.10.1981 Sr Lect B.Sc. M.Sc -- 11.10.2004

21

Dr. H.G. Anil

Kumar 20.07.1976 Lecturer B.Sc

M.Sc Ph.D 27.11.2006


tion


Joining UG PG Ph.

Evaluators’

Space



D

22 Ms. Sunitha.V.R. 20.05.1976 Lecturer B.Sc

M.S

MPhi

l 01.08.2007

23 Ms. T.R. Geetha 02.05.1971 Lecturer

B.Sc

. M.Sc -- 01.09.2006

24 Ms. Deepthi Rao 02.01.1981 Lecturer

B.Sc M.Sc. -- 22.08.2005

25

Mr.Chandru

Hegde 12.07.1983 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 05.08.2010

26 Ms.T.Poornima 23.05.1975 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 30.08.2007

27

Ms.K.Vrinda

Kamath 09.11.1981 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 13.08.2007

28 Mr.N.Manjunath 02.02.1980 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 13.03.2008

29 Mr. Edwin R Das 21.12.1984 Lecturer

BB

M MA -- 20.08.2009

30 Ms.Nityashree N 14.12.1982 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 01.09.2010

31

Mr.Shaik

Shabbeer Basha 04.01.1986 Lecturer B.Sc M.Sc -- 22.09.2008

32

Mr.R Keshava

Murthy 18.07.1983 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 02.08.2010

33

Mr.Sadananda

Megeri 22.07.1983 Lecturer BE ME -- 06.08.2010

34

Mr. Adarsha

Hiriyannaiah 09.04.1985 Lecturer BE MS -- 03.08.2009

35 Mr.Saravanan V 26.03.1982 Lecturer BE ME -- 19.07.2010

36

Mr.H C

Shashidhara 06.01.1984 Lecturer BE MS -- 01.09.2010

37

Ms.K.A.Vishnu

Priya 02.07.1985 Lecturer

B.Te

ch -- -- 04.08.2008

38 Ms.Chaitra K S 09.10.1987 Lecturer BE -- -- 10.03.2010

39 Mr.Chaitanya N S 02.12.1987 Lecturer BE -- -- 10.03.2010

40 Mr.Dayananda 15.04.1985 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 15.08.2010

41

Mr.Snehal Dev

Savio Pinto 25.10.1981 Lecturer BE -- -- 07.07.2008

42 Mr.R.Prakash 15.03.1972 Lecturer BE -- -- 07.08.2007

43 Ms.G.Swetha 05.12.1985 Lecturer BE -- -- 18.09.2008

44 Ms.Roopa K.S 21.07.1986 Lecturer BE -- -- 31.08.2009

45 Ms.Vijayashree K 23.12.1987 Lecturer BE -- -- 23.08.2010


tion


Joining

UG PG Ph.

Evaluators’

Space



D

46 Ms. Ranjitha.B.C. 12.01.1988 Lecturer BE -- -- 29.09.2010

47

Ms.Priya

Badrinath 10.12.1985 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 30.07.2010

48 Ms.Roopa T 23.04.1978 Lecturer BE -- -- 05.01.2011

49 Mr.Fairoz Pasha 05.01.1983 Lecturer BE -- -- 17.01.2008

50 Mr.Krian P 13.03.1985 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 14.07.2010

51 Ms.V.Rashmi 07.07.1984 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 14.09.2009

52

Mr.Vivek Kumar

Prasad 22.09.1981 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 12.07.2010

53

Ms.Rinu Sara

Jacob 23.05.1986 Lecturer

B.Te

ch

M.Te

ch -- 06.05.2010

54 Mr.Rahu H V 20.08.1984 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 26.07.2010

55 Mr.Sankalp Bailur 26.05.1982 Lecturer BE MS -- 02.08.2010

56

Ms.Rashika

Gandage 15.09.1981 Lecturer BE

M.Te

ch -- 24.07.2008

II-I.5.1 Assessment of Faculty Availability for FIRST YEAR courses in teacher-

student ratio of 1: 15 (15)

Three years of data for first year courses to calculate the teacher-student ratio:

Items CAY CAYm1 CAYm2

Number of students in First Year 840 840 840

Number of faculty teaching first year courses 56 56 56

Teacher-student ratio 1:15 1:15 1:15

Av. Teacher-student ratio (in first year courses):1:15

II-I.5.2 Assessment of Qualification (10)

Assessment of Qualification = (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N

Where,

X = No. of faculty members with Ph. D

Y= No. of faculty members with M. E. /M. Tech

Z= No. of faculty members with B. E. / B. Tech/M.Sc. /M. A.

N=Total no. of faculty members

Year x y z N FQI Assessment

Evaluators’

Space



CAYm2 11 16 - 27 7.62 30.48

CAYm1 10 17 - 27 7.48 29.92

CAY 13 20 - 33 7.57 30.36

Avg. Assessment 30.25

II-I.6 Academic performance in First Year Common Courses (40)

Academic Performance = 40 * FYSI

Where FYSI = First Year Success Index

= (No. of students who have cleared all the subjects in a single attempt of their semester

or yearend examination) / (Total no. of students admitted in the first year)

Items CAYm1 CAYm2 CAYm3

No. of students admitted in First Year

(Appeared for Exam.) 840 840 840

No. of students who have cleared all

subjects in single attempt 691 720 720

First Year Success Index (FYSI) 0.82 0.86 0.86

Avg. FYSI = 0.85

Academic Performance = 40 * Avg. FYSI =34



PART II

Department / Programme Summary

(Criteria III to VIII)

D.0.1. Name and Address of the Department:

Information Science and Engineering

D.0.2. Name, designation, telephone numbers and e-mail id of the contact person for

NBA:

Prof. Shylaja S S

Professor & Head,

Department of Information Science and Engineering

P E S Institute of Technology,

Bangalore-560085.

Ph: 080 – 26721983 (Ext:700)

Mail-id: [email protected]

D.0.3. History of the Department (including dates of introduction and no. of seats of

various programmes of study, which are run by the department along with

NBA accreditation, if any), in tabular form:

Programme of Study Description

UG in Information Science

and Engineering

Started with 60 seats in 1998

Intake increased to 120 in 2006

Accredited by NBA-AICTE in 2004 for 03

years

Accredited by NBA-AICTE in 2008 for 03

years

PG in Software Engineering Started with 18 seats in 2010

D.0.4. List the names of the Programmes/Departments which share human

resources and/or the facilities of this Department/Programmes

NIL

D.0.5. Total No. of Students: 542 Boys: 364 Girls : 178 BE ( 1 to 4 years)

18 14 04 M. Tech

D.0.6. Total No. of Employee : 39 Male: 19 Female : 20

Teaching : 29 : 13 : 16

Non Teaching : 10 : 06 : 04

Evaluators’

Space

mailto:[email protected]



D.0.7. Minimum and maximum number of faculty and staff on roll during the

current and previous two academic years (1st July to 30

th June) in the

Department:

CAY

2010-11

CAY minus 1

2009-10

Cay minus 2

2008-09

Min Max Min Max Min Max

Teaching faculty

in the

Department

26 29 23 29 22 29

Teaching faculty

with

the Programme

26 29 23 29 22 29

Non-teaching staff 10 10 09 11 09 13

D.0.8. Summary of budget for the CFY and the actual expenditures incurred in the

CFYm1 and CFYm2 (exclusively for this Programme in the Department)

Items

Budgeted in

CFY

(In Lakhs)

Actual expenses

in

CFY (till Jan

2011)

(In Lakhs)

Actual

Expenses

in CFYm1

(In Lakhs)

Actual

Expenses

in CFYm2

(In Lakhs)

Laboratory

equipments

8.54 1.00 NIL 1.00

SW purchase 4.00 NIL 1.00 0.75

Laboratory

consumables 2.00 0.70 1.35 1.10

Maintenance

and spares 2.20 0.20 0.35 0.40

Travel 4.50 1.73 2.15 3.00

Miscellaneous

expenses 15.23 8.36 5.18 6.00

Evaluators’

Space



Criterion III: Students’ Entry and Outputs (150)

III-P.1 Students admission (10)

Admission Intake 150

Items CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

Cay m2

2008-09

Cay m3

2007-08

Sanctioned Intake Strength in the

program 150 150 150 150

No. of total admitted students in

First year 124 120 127 127

No. of total admitted students

(including lateral entry if any),

belonging to the same batch

NA 140 145 143

Admission Quality: Divide the total admitted ranks (or percentage-marks) into 5 or

a few more meaningful ranges

Under Graduate Intake Quality

Rank

Range

CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

Cay m2

2008-09

Cay m3

2007-08

CE

T

CO

ME

DK

Mg

mt

CE

T

CO

ME

DK

Mg

mt

CE

T

CO

M

DK

Mg

mt

C

ET

CO

ME

DK

Mg

mt

1 to

2,000 26 10 0 22 04 0 14 30 0 30 29 0

2,001 to

4,000 04 20 3 04 26 1 05 NIL 3 15

NI

L 0

4,001 to

6,000 06 NIL 1 09

NI

L 2 05 NIL 1 05

NI

L 1

6,001 to

8,000 09 NIL 2 03

NI

L 3 01 NIL 0 02

NI

L 1

8,001

and

above

14 NIL 24 19 NI

L 25 10 NIL 20 14

NI

L 24

Admitte

d

without

rank

NIL NIL NIL NI

L

NI

L NIL

NI

L NIL

NI

L

NI

L

NI

L NIL

Evaluators’

Space



Post Graduate Intake Quality

Rank Range

CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

Cay m2

2008-09

Cay m3

2007-08

PG

CET

GAT

E

PG

CET

GAT

E

PG

CET

GAT

E

PG

CET

GAT

E

1 to 2,000 14 01 NA NA NA NA NA NA

2,001 to 4,000 02 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA

4,001 to 6,000 00 00 NA NA NA NA NA NA

8,001 and

above 02 06 NA NA NA NA NA NA

Admitted

without rank NIL NIL NA NA NA NA NA NA

III-P.2 Success Rate (30)

Provide data for the past 7 batches of students (Successfully completed implies Zero

Backlogs)

Year of Entry

(in reverse

Chronological

order)

# of

Students

Admitted

in 1st

year +

Admitted

in 2nd

year

(x + y)

# of

Students

successfully

completed

1st year

of Students

successfully

completed

2nd

year

# of

Students

successfully

completed

3rd

year

# of

Students

successfully

completed

4th

year

CAY

2010-11 120

CAYm1

2009-10

140 96

CAYm2

2008-09 145 105 118

CAYm3

2006-07 145 101 118 129

CAYm4 / LYG

2005-06 141 131 113 103 128

CAYm5/LYGm1

2004-05 141 129 105 112 129

CAYm6/LYGm2

2003-04 128 128 86 97 110

Success Rate = 30 * Mean of Success Index (SI) for past 3 batches

Evaluators’

Space



SI = (No. of students who cleared the program in the minimum period of course

duration) / (No. of students admitted in the first year of that batch)

Items

CAYm4 /

LYG

2005-06

CAYm5 /

LYGm1

2004-05

CAYm6 /

LYG m2

2003-04

No. of students admitted in the

corresponding First Year 120 120 120

No. of students who have graduated

in 4 years 117 116 108

Success Index (SI) 0.97 0.96 0.90

Av. SI = 0.94

Success Rate = 30 * Av. SI = 28.2

III-P.3 Academic performance (30)

Academic Performance = 3 * API

Where API = Academic Performance Index

= Mean of Cumulative Grade Point Average of all the Students on a

10 point CGPA System

OR

= Mean of the percentage of marks of all students / 10

Items

CAYm4 /

LYG

2005-06

CAYm5 /

LYGm1

2004-05

CAYm6 /

LYG m2

2003-04

Approximating the API by the following mid-point analysis

# of students in 10.0 <= CGPA < 9.0 01 01 00










Total 120 120 120

Approximating API by Mid-CGPA 8.0 8.0 7.92

Exact Mean of CGPA/Percentage of

all the students (API) 7.92 7.86 7.5

Evaluators’

Space



Avg. API = 7.97

Academic Performance = 3 x Avg. API = 23.91

III-P.4 Placement and higher studies (40)

Assessment Points = 40 * (X + 1.25 * Y) / N

Where

X = Number of students placed,

Y = Number of students admitted for higher studies with valid qualifying

scores / ranks,

N = Total number of students who were admitted in the batch subject to

Max. Assessment Points = 40.

Items

CAYm4 /

LYG

2005-06

CAYm5 /

LYGm1

2004-05

CAYm6 /

LYG m2

2003-04

# of Admitted students

corresponding to LYG (N)

141+

100*

141+

100*

128+

105*

# of students who obtained jobs as

per the record of placement office

(X1)

95 100 100

# of students who found employment

otherwise at the end of the final

year (X2)

35 38 27

X = X1 + X2 130 138 127

Number of students who went for

higher studies with valid qualifying

scores/ranks (Y)**

14 12 13

Assessment Points 41.84 43.40 44.76

Note: * Indicate students eligible for placements during 6th

semester

+Includes Lateral Entry + PIO Quota Students.

** Data is from the alumni students.

Avg. Assessment Points = 43.33 == 40

III-P.5 Professional Activities (20)

Provide data for the past 3 years – CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2

Refer Annexure 2

Evaluators’

Space



III-P.5.1 Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events (4)

Refer Annexure 2 – Table 2.1

III-P.5.2 Organization of paper contests, design contests etc. and their achievements

(4)


III-P.5.3 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc. (4)


III-P.5.4 Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, innovations (4)

Specify the efforts and achievements


III-P.5.5 Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the

programme of study (4)


Include a Table having those publications, which fetch awards by students in the

events/conferences organized by other institutes. Include a tabulated list of all other

student publications in a separate annexure.


III-P.6 Students’ Projects Quality (20)

Include list of five best and average projects each, taken each from three years–

CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2 – along with their contributions

Refer Annexure 3

Evaluators’

Space



Criterion IV: Faculty Contributions

List of Department Faculty : Exclusively for the Program / Shared with other

Programs

Name of the

Faculty

Design

ation

(admin

istrativ

e

positio

ns, if

any,)

Qualificat

ion,

Universit

y and

year of

graduatio

n

Areas of

Specializ

ation

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ nC NJ NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Refer Annexure 4

IV-P.1 Teacher Student ratio (20)

Assessment = 20 * TSR / 15

Where

TSR = Teacher Student Ratio = (x + y + z) / N subject to Max. TSR = 15;

Where

x = No. of students in 2nd

year of the program

y = No. of students in 3rd

year of the program

z = No. of students in 4th

year of the program

N = Total No. Faculty Members in the program

Year x y z x+y+z N TSR Assessment

CAY m2

2008-09 145 146 144 435 29 15 20.00

CAY m1

2009-10 156 142 153 451 29 15 20.00

CAY

2010-11 139 133 141 421 29 14.24 20.00


Evaluators’

Space



IV-P.2 Cadre ratio (20)

Assessment = 20 * CRI

Where CRI, Cadre Ratio Index = 2.25 ( 2x + y ) / N subject to Max. CRI = 1.0;

Where

x = No. of professors in the program

y = No. of associate professors / readers in the program

N = Total No. Faculty Members in the program

Year x y N CRI Assessment

CAY m2

2008-09 04 00 29 0.62 12.40

CAY m1

2009-10 05 00 29 0.78 15.60

CAY

2010-11 04 01 29 0.70 14.00


IV-P.3 Faculty qualifications (40)

Assessment = 4 * FQI

Where FQI = Faculty Qualification Index

= (10 * x + 6 * y + 4 * z) / N

Where

x = No. of Faculty Members with Ph. D in Engineering

y = No. of Faculty Members with M. E / M. Tech

z = No. of Faculty Members with B. E / B. Tech

N = Total No. Faculty Members

Year x y z x+y+z N FQI Assessment

CAY m2

2008-09 04 15 10 29 29 5.86 23.44

CAY m1

2009-10 04 10 15 29 29 5.51 22.04

CAY

2010-11 03 19 07 29 29 5.93 23.72


Evaluators’

Space



IV-P.4 Faculty retention (20)

Assessment = 4 * RPI / N

Where RPI = Retention Point Index = Points assigned to all Faculty

Where Points assigned to a faculty = 1 point for each year of experience at the

Institute but not exceeding 5. N = Total No. of Faculty Members

Item CAY m2

2008-09

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY

2010-11

# of faculty with less than 1y (x0) 00 00 00

# of faculty with 1y <= period < 2y

(x1) 08 01 00


(x2) 12 12 00


(x3) 09 18 18


(x4) 20 12 20

# of faculty with more than 5 y (x5) 10 15 20

N 29 29 29

RPI = x1 + 2x2 + 3x3 + 4x4 +5x5 189 202 234

Assessment 26.06 27.86 32.27


IV-P.5 Research publications and IPR (20)

Faculty Points in Publications and IPR (FPPR) = Assessment of Publications +

Assessment of IPR

Assessment of Publications = 3 * Sum of the Research points scored by each Faculty

member / No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers

Assessment of IPR = Sum of the IPR points scored by each Faculty member / No. of

sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers

Note: A faculty member scores at the most 5 Research points depending upon the

quality of the research papers published in the past 3 years. For this research

papers considered are those (i) which can be located on Internet and/or are included

in hard-copy volumes/proceedings, published by a well known publishing house,

and (ii) the faculty member's affiliation, in the published paper, is the one of the

same college/institute. For multiple authors, every author of the same college will

earn the points.

Evaluators’

Space



Similarly, a faculty member scores 1 point for each IPR subject to a maximum of 5

points. Include a list of all such publications along with details of DOI, publisher,

month/year, etc.

Name of faculty (contributing to

FPPR)

CAY m2

2008-09

Pub Points

(x)

IPR Points

(y)

Pub + IPR

Points (3x +y)

Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya Murthy 03 00 09

Prof. S S Shylaja 03 00 09

Dr. Suthikshn Kumar 03 00 09

Dr. Srikanta Murthy K 05 00 15

Dr. S Natarajan 01 00 03

Mr. Narendra UP 01 00 03

Ms. Jayashree R 01 00 03

Sum 51

N (Min. N is 3) (excluding Asstt

Prof.) 03

Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N) 17


FPPR)

CAY m1

2009-10

Pub Points

(x)

IPR Points

(y)

Pub + IPR

Points (3x +y)




Dr. Srikanta Murthy K 01 00 03


Sum 42


Prof.) 03

Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N) 14

Evaluators’

Space




FPPR)

CAY 2010-11

Pub Points

(x)

IPR Points

(y)

Pub + IPR

Points (3x +y)





Ms. Ganga Holi 04 00 12

Ms. Sangeetha J 02 00 06

Mr. Vinay A 04 00 12

Mr. Devaraj Verma C 01 00 03

Mr. Dheeraj D 01 00 03

Ms. Sharmila Chidaravalli 02 00 06

Ms. P Rama Devi 01 00 03

Ms Chaitali Choudhary 01 00 03

Sum 97


Prof.) 03

Assessment FPPR = (Sum/N) 32.33

Avg. Assessment FPPR = 20.00

Refer Annexure 5 Faculty Publication Details

IV-P.6 Externally funded R & D projects and consultancy work (20)

Assessment of R&D & Consultancy Projects = 4 * Sum of FPPC by each faculty /

No. of sanctioned positions of Professors and Readers

Where

FPPC = Faculty Points in Projects and Consultancy

Note: A faculty member gets at the most 5 points depending upon the amount of

externally funded R & D project and/or consultancy work. For multiple faculty

members involved in a single project, every faculty member will earn the points,

depending on the funding agency as given below: 5 points for funding by National

Agency, 4 points for funding by State Agency, 3 points for funding by private sector,

and 2 points for funding by the sponsoring Trust/Society. Points to be awarded, if

the total fund available for a project is of minimal one lakh rupees in the CFY.

Evaluators’

Space



Refer Annexure 6 Faculty R & D, Consultancy Details

IV-P.7 Interactions of faculty members with outside world (10)

Assessment of Interaction = 2 * Sum of IP by each faculty / No. of sanctioned

positions of Professors and Readers

Where

IP = Interaction points scored by each faculty member

Note: A faculty member gets at the most 5 Interaction Points depending upon the

type of Institution or R&D Lab or Industry. Only those interactions will be

considered who have resulted in joint quality publication, R& D projects and/or

consultancy. The points earned by each faculty shall be decided as given below:

5 points for interaction with a well known Institute/University abroad, 4 points for

interaction with Institute of Eminence in India or National Research Labs, 3 points

for interaction with University / Industry in India and Institute/University (not

covered) above 2 points for interaction with State Level Institutions, and 1 point for

interaction with private affiliated Institutions.

Point to be awarded, are for those activities, which result in joint efforts in

publication of books/research paper, pursuing externally funded R & D projects

and/or development of semester-long course/teaching modules.

Name of faculty (contributing

to FPPC)

FPPC Points

CAY m2

2008-09

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY

2010-11

Dr. K N Balasubramanya

Murthy 5 NIL NIL

Prof. Shylaja S S 3 NIL NIL

Dr. K Srikanta Murthy 5 3 NIL

Ms. Ganga Holi 3 NIL NIL

Mr. Karthik S 3 NIL NIL

Sum 19 3 NIL

N (Min. N is 3)

(excluding Asstt Prof.) 3 3 3

Assessment FPPC = 4 x

Sum/N 25.33 4 NIL


Evaluators’

Space



* Activities ongoing in CAY

Name of faculty

(contributing to IP)

IP Points

CAY m2

2008-09

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY

2010-11*

Dr. K. N. Balasubramanya

Murthy 05 05 05

Dr. SrikantaMurthy K 05 NIL NIL




Ms. Ganaga Holi 03 03 05

Ms. Sangeetha J NIL 04 NIL

Mr. Karthik S 03 03 NIL

Ms. Ambika T 03 NIL 03

Mr. Vinay A 01 03 05

Ms. Parimala R NIL 02 NIL

Mr. Devraj Verma C NA NA 01

Mr. Dheeraj NA NA 02

Ms. RamaDevi NA NA 02

Ms. Chitali Chowdry NA NA 02

Assessment FPPC =2 x Sum/N 23.33 23.33 20.00


Evaluators’

Space



Criterion V: Facilities and Technical Support

Description of Class rooms, faculty rooms, seminar and conference halls

Room

Description Usage

Shared /

Exclusive Capacity Rooms Equipped with

Refer Annexure 7

V-P.1 Class rooms in the department (15)

V-P.1.1 Enough rooms for lectures (core/electives), seminars, tutorials, etc for the

program (5)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

V-P.1.2 Teaching aids – black/white-board, multimedia projectors, etc. (5)


V-P.1.3 Acoustics, class room size, conditions of chairs/benches, air circulation,

lighting, exits, ambiance, etc. (5)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection

thereof

V-P.2 Faculty rooms in the department (15)

V-P.2.1 Availability of individual faculty rooms (5)


V-P.2.2 Room equipped with white/black board, computer, internet, etc. (5)


V-P.2.3 Usage of room for discussion/counseling with students (5)

Assessment based on the information provided in the above table and the inspection

thereof

Evaluators’

Space



V-P.3 Laboratories in the department to meet the curriculum requirements as well

as the PEOs (25)

Curriculum Lab

Description

Exclusive

use/

Shared?

Space/

#

Studen

ts

# of

experimen

ts

Quality

of

instrume

nts

Lab

manuals

Data Structures Lab

Exclusive

80 12

Good

Available

Digital Design Lab 80 12

OOP with C++ Lab 75 12

Analysis & Design of Algorithms Lab

80 12

System Software Lab 80 06 + 1 Mini

Project

Operating Systems Lab 75 12

Web Technologies Lab 75 12

Object Oriented Analysis and Design Lab

80 10 + 2 Mini

Projects

Mobile Computing Lab 80 12

OOP using Java Lab 80 12

Microcontroller Lab 75 12

Computer Networks Lab 80 12

Unix System Programming Lab

80 12

Advanced Java Programming Lab

80 12

Note: Same physical space is used for conducting different labs.

V-P.3.1 Enough labs to run all the program specific curriculum (10)


V-P.3.2 Availability of computing facilities available exclusively in the department

(5) Assessment based on the information provided in the above table

V-P.3.3 Availability of labs with tech. support within and beyond working hours (5)


V-P.3.4 Equipments to run experiments and their maintenance, Number of students

per experimental set up, Size of the laboratories, overall ambience etc. (5)


Evaluators’

Space



V-P.4.1 Availability of adequate and qualified technical supporting staff for

program specific labs (10)

Name of

the

Technical

Staff

Designation

(Pay-scale)

Exclu

sive

/Shar

ed

Work

?

Date

of

Joini

ng

Qualification Other

Techni

cal

Skills

gained?

Responsibility At

Joini

ng

Now

N Ajay

Pokale

Programmer

Basic:

6680/-

Gross:

12475/-

Exclu

sive

02-

11-

2000

B.SC B.SC

Hardwa

re

Trouble

Shootin

g and

Networ

king

Assist with

analysis,

maintenance,

and installation

of software

Y.Raviku

mar

Computer

Operator

Basic:

4500/-

Gross:

8306/-

14-

10-

2005

ITI ITI

Hardwa

re

Trouble

Shootin

g and

Networ

king

Aid in fixing

computer

problems,

contacting those

who can remedy

computer

problems when

unable to do so

and tracking

computer

operations on a

daily basis.

T.

Madhusudh

an

System

Analyst

Basic

4300/-

Gross

7942/-

15-

04-

2008

B.Co

m

B.Co

m

Hardwa

re

Trouble

Shootin

g and

Networ

king

Utilization of

computing

facility in lab

conduction

S.Ramesh

Babu

Lab

Assistant

Basic:2300/

-

Gross:4319/

-

03-

03-

2006

Diplo

ma in

Electr

onics

Diplo

ma in

Elect

ronic

s

Hardwa

re

Trouble

Shootin

g and

Networ

king

Strictly monitor

access to the lab;

allowing access

only to students

having an ID

card, Monitor the

lab, keeping an

eye out for theft,

disruptions of

any kind, and the

proper

functioning of

the lab

equipment

Evaluators’

Space



V-P.4.2 Incentives, skill-up gradation and professional advancement (10)

Details of training undergone by the technical staff

Name of the

Technical Staff Workshop Attended Date

Organization /

Institution

Mr. N Ajay Pokale

Workshop on

Hardware Trouble

Shooting and

Networking

05th – 08

th

July, 2010

RNS Institute of

Technology

Mr. Y. RaviKumar

Workshop on E-

Vidya Streaming

Systems

2nd

Dec, 2009

M. S. Ramaiah

Institute of

Technology

Mr T.

Madhusudhan Workshop on Ubuntu

18th – 20

th Jan,

2010

R V College of

Engineering

Mr. S. Ramesh

Babu

Workshop on

Hardware Trouble

Shooting and

Networking

05th – 08

th

July, 2010

RNS Institute of

Technology

Evaluators’

Space



Criterion VI: Continuous Improvements

VI-P.1 Improvement in Success Index of students (10)

From III-P.2

Items LYG

2005-06

LYGm1

2004-05

LYG m2

2003-04

Success Index 0.97 0.96 0.90

VI-P.2 Improvement in academic performance of students (10)

From III-P.3

Items LYG

2005-06

LYGm1

2004-05

LYG m2

2003-04

API 7.92 7.86 7.5

VI-P.3 Enhancement of faculty qualifications and retention (15)

From IV-P.3 and IV-P.4

Items CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

FQI 5.93 5.51 5.86

RPI 234 202 189

VI-P.4 Improvement in Faculty activities in research publication, R & D work and

consultancy, and interaction (15)

From IV-P.5 and IV-P.6

Items CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

FPPR 32.33 14 17

FPPC * 4.0 25.33

IP 20 23.33 23.33

SUM 52.33 41.33 65.66

Note: * Proposal submitted to AICTE

Evaluators’

Space



VI-P.5 Continuing education (10)

Specify the contributory efforts made by the faculty by developing the course/lab

modules and conducting short-term courses/workshops etc. for continuing

education:

Module

Descriptio

n

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industr

y

Developed/

organized

by

Duratio

n

Resourc

e

Persons

Target

Audienc

e

Usages

and

citation

etc.

Refer Annexure 8 (Table 8.1)

VI-P.6 New facility created (10)

Specify the new facility created to strengthening the curriculum and/or to meet the

PEOs:

Module

Descriptio

n

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industr

y

Developed/

organized

by

Duratio

n

Resourc

e

Persons

Target

Audienc

e

Usages

and

citation

etc.

In CAY m2 2008-09

In CAY m1 2009-10

In CAY 2010-11

Refer Annexure 8 (Table 8. 2)

VI-P.7 Overall improvements (5)

Specify the overall successive improvements in curriculum and others:

Specify the

improveme

nt

Improvemen

t brought in

Contributed

by

List of PEO(s),

which are

strengthened

Comments, if any

In CAY m2 2008-09

In CAY m1 2009-10

In CAY 2010-11

Refer Annexure 9

Evaluators’

Space



Criterion VII: Curriculum

List all the course modules along with their objectives and outcomes (in Part III):

Course

Units

Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignments/

tests needed

to meet

objectives?

Comments

Theory Lab

Refer Annexure 10

VII-P.1 Contents of basic sciences, HSS, professional core and electives, and breadth

(40)

Assessment is based on the balanced composition of basic sciences, HSS, professional

core and electives, and breadth to meet the PEOs. If such components are not included in

the curriculum provided by the affiliated university, then the college/Inst. should make

additional efforts to impart such knowledge through covering such aspects through

“contents beyond syllabi”.

VII-P.2 Emphasis on laboratory and project work (30)

Assessment is based on the balanced laboratory and project work along with theory, to

meet the PEOs. If enough lab/design/experimentation components are not included in the

curriculum provided by the affiliated university, then the college/Inst. should make

additional efforts to impart such knowledge through covering such aspects through

“contents beyond syllabi”.

VII-P.3 Curriculum updates and PEO reviews (30)

List of course modules (along with coverage beyond syllabus) and PEOs which were

updated and revised in past 3 years by the college, irrespective of curriculum updates by

the affiliating university, in order to meet the corresponding PEOs

VII-P.4 Additional contents to bridge curriculum gaps (25)

Assessment is based on program specific contents which are added to bridge curriculum

gaps across the courses in order to achieve PEOs and the specific course objectives

Evaluators’

Space



Criterion VIII: Program Educational Objectives – Their Compliance and Outcomes

List all the course modules along with their PEOs (in Part III):

Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)

Additional contents to meet

objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers

Theory Lab Theory Lab Assignments/

Tests

Refer Annexure 11

VIII-P.1 Course objective and mapping (20)

Assessment is based on the PEOs defined for a course or a set of courses and their

mapping with the content delivery and knowledge gain through theory classes, lab

experiments, assignments and tests.

Refer Annexure 12

VIII-P.2 Assessment outcomes (20)

Assessment is based on the feasibility, applicability and quality of the PEOs‟ with the

course delivery. Assessment is also based on the methodologies for outcome

measurements from the stake-holders including industry, alumni, and professional bodies.

VIII-P.3 Mapping with faculty expertise (20)

Course

Units

Area of

specialization

needed to

achieve

PEOs

specified by

Name of the

faculty whose

expertise

matched with

the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Refer Annexure 13

Assessment is based on the factor that the expertise needed to deliver the contents is met

with the faculty expertise and on a balanced load factor of the concerned faculty. Faculty

expertise should be adequate to cater for all the major fields specified in the program

criteria.

Evaluators’

Space



VIII-P.4 Mapping with outcomes (20)

Assessment is based on what extent the PEOs/curriculum map with the outcomes.

Refer Annexure 12

VIII-P.5 Significant achievements (20)

List significant achievements, in respect of curriculum, stated PEOs and their outcomes,

in CAY, CAYm1 and CAYm2.

Items CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Results 96% (Till 7

th

Semester)* 99% 98%

Placements 92%* 99% 99%

Publications 16 06 04

Internships 90%* 20% 22%

Higher Studies 14* 12 13

* Indicates ongoing activities

Evaluators’

Space



PART III

CURRICULUM, SYLLABI, PEOS AND OUTCOMES

1. Programme Educational Objectives & Course Objectives

Refer Annexure 13

2. Program and Course Outcomes

Refer Annexure 13

3. Mapping PEOS with expected outcomes

Refer Annexure 12

4. Additional contents beyond the syllabi, if needed, to be provided to meet the

outcomes with the course objectives.

1. Preplacement Training

2. Training on Soft skills

3. Creative / Hobby Projects

4. Guest lectures

5. Finishing School

5. How to make provisions for the additional contents, if needed to bridge the gaps,

in the academic calendar.

Free slots in time table for 1,2, 3 and 5 and lecture class for 4.

Refer Annexure 14

Evaluators’

Space



P E S INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY

DEPARTMENT OF INFORMATION SCIENCE & ENGINEERING

ANNEXURE 1





ANNEXURE 2

Table 2.1. Professional societies/ chapters and organizing engineering events

Events CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Professional Society / Chapters 01 NIL NIL

Professional Society

Membership (IEEE /

CSI/ ISTE/ ACM)

15 05 05

Engineering Events 10 09 06

Table 2.2. Organization of paper contests, design contests etc. and their

achievements

Events CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Organization of paper contests 01 NIL NIL

Design contests 01 02 NIL

Extended Week Day * 09 10 NIL

Table 2.3. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters etc.

Publication CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Technical magazines NA NA NA

Technical / Literary magazines 01 01 01

Newsletters 02 02 02



Table 2.4. Entrepreneurship initiatives, product designs, innovations

Specify the efforts and achievements

Events CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Entrepreneurship initiatives 01 01 NIL

Product Design NIL NIL NIL

Innovations 02 NIL NIL

Table 2.5. Publications and awards in inter institute events by students of the

programme of study (4)

Events CAY

2010-11

CAY m1

2009-10

CAY m2

2008-09

Publication Award

01

(ACM Best

Paper Award)

01

(IEEE Best

Paper Award)

01

(HP Best Paper

Award)

Table 2.6. Student Publication Details

Sl

No.

Name of the

student

Details of the Conference

/Journal

Guide Name

with

affiliation

Title of the paper

1. Raghu Raj P

International Conference on

Computer Graphics,

Imaging and Visualization

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Algorithmic Approach for

prediction and early detection

of disease using retinal

images

2.

Manish

Kumar,

Prajwal B S,

Mahesh Raju S

R


Content Based Image

Retrieval

Near Duplicate Image

Detection And Classification

3. Pritha D N,

Savitha L


Computer and Automation

Engineering

Face Recognition Using

Trichotomic Combination of

SVD, DF-LDA and LPP

4. Pritha D N,

Savitha L

First International

Conference on Integrated

Intelligent Computing

Face Recognition by feed

forward Neural Network by

Laplacian of Gaussian filter

& Singular Value

Decomposition



Sl

No.

Name of the

student


/Journal

Guide Name

with

affiliation

Title of the paper

5.

Abhijit K G,

Jayashree D,

Mohd. Saifulla

S

Cutting Edge Technologies

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Feature Extraction and

Compression of face image

using Gabor Filters

6.


Computing, Communication

and Networking

Technologies

Efficient Retrieval of Face

Images on Curvelet and

Singular Value

Decomposition

7.

Amrita ACM-W

Celebration of Women in

Computing

Aggregation of Gabor

Wavelets and Curvelet with

PCA for Efficient Retrieval of

Face Images

8.

Ramya S,

Radhika S,

Nikita John,

Prateek Rao

2nd

International Conference

on Digital Image

Proceedings in Singapore on

26th February, 2010

Face Detection in Color

Images using Skin Color,

LOG filter and Euler Number

9.

Akshatha

Udupa,

Kusuma S

National Conference on

Intelligent Information

Retrieval

Comparative Analysis of

Color Layout Descriptor &

Edge Histogram Descriptor

10.

Akshatha Patil,

Garima

Srivastava,

Geethu Babu


Intelligent Information

Retrieval

Dimensionality Reduction

using Gaussian Mixture

Model-An Application to

Face Recognition

11.

Nitin N,

Pavan

Kulkarni, &

Suman

Bharadwaj

16the Korea- Japan, Joint

Workshop on Frontiers of

Computer Vision, FCV-

2010, held at Hiroshima,

Japan (proceedings: pp-50-

56)

Ms. Ganga

Holi

A Simple and Effective

technique to enhance the

degraded document using

signal valued decomposition

and Adaptive thresholding

12.

Nitin N,

Pavan

Kulkarni, &

Suman

Bharadwaj

Recent Research Trend on

Advanced Computing

RTAC- 2010, held at

Madurai, India Published in

Proceedings

Degraded document Image

Enhancement using singular

Valued Decomposition

13.

Riddhi J Shah,

Sandhya B,

Swati D V

ICDIP- 2010, International

Conference on Digital

Image Proceeding held in

Raome, Italy, April 2010

Application of Morphological

operations on degraded

Historical Document Image

for Image Enhancement

14.

Saurabh

Kumar,

Priyanka

Chandra,

Shishir

Kaushik,

Zeeshan

Ahmad

Knowledge USTAV- 2010,

National Conference held at

SBMJCE, Bangalore

Interactive Shell



Sl

No.

Name of the

student


/Journal

Guide Name

with

affiliation

Title of the paper

15.

Prateek

Saxena,

Shikhar

Chandra

IEEE International

Conference on

Communication Control and

Computing Technologies

Mr. Vinay. A

Bandwidth Aware Load

Balancing and Optimal

bandwidth Allocation

Techniques for Video-on-

Demand System

16.

Abhijit K G,

Jayashree D,

Mohd. Saifulla

S

IEEE International

Conference on Computer

Engineering and

Technology, Jhodpur

A Novel Framework for

Distributed Dynamic Load

Balancing in Video-on-

Demand Systems

17. Prateek

Saxena

Fourth IEEE International

Conference on Internet

Multimedia Systems

Architecture and

Applications (IMSAA-10),

Bangalore

Architectural Solution for

Improving Performance of

Video-on-Demand Systems

18.

Prateek

Saxena,

Shikhar

Chandra


Emerging Trends in

Engineering Technology

and Applications,

Bangalore.

RADLBS: A Resource Aware

Dynamic Load Balancing

Strategy for Video-on-

Demand Systems

19. Abhinav

Prakash

An Optimal Video

Replication Framework for

Video-on-Demand Systems

20. Naveen B K HP Technical Paper Contest

Making Use thread pool to

improve UTMPD

performance

21.

Raghavendra

N.B,

Rakshith R

Babu, Siddarth

.M

2nd

State level technical

student paper presentation,

SJBIT college, Bangalore-

060 16th October 2008

NIL

Innovative approach to secure

computing systems in

networks using windows

registry without cost

22. Raghavendra

N.B


Future Networks (ICFN09),

Bangkok (7-9 march 2009),

Thailand- IEEE-CPS

proceedings, ICFN

proceedings

NIL

Innovative approach to secure

computing systems in

networks using windows

registry

23.

Raghavendra

N.B, Rakshith

R Babu,

Siddarth .M

First National Conference

on Cryptography and

Network Security

(NCCNS), Vellore Institute

of Technology (18-19 Feb

2009), Tamilnadu- VIT

conference proceedings

NIL

An innovative approach to

secure computing systems

from worms, viruses



Sl

No.

Name of the

student


/Journal

Guide Name

with

affiliation

Title of the paper

24. Arathi .P &

Poornima K S CSI Chapter Bangalore NIL

Improving end to end

availability of overlay

networks

25.

Akshatha

Udupa,

Ranjitha C

APORS- 2009

NIL

Minimization Approach of

Assignment Technique to

solbe a Transpiration Problem

26. Rahul Bansal Relio Quick Auto Mall NIL Part of Team „Aidra‟ Second

Position for best concept car





ANNEXURE 3

Table 3.1 Best Projects

CAY

Name of

the

Student(s)

Project

Title

Areas of

Specializat

ion

Project

Supervisor

(s)

Contribution/

Achievements /

Research

Output

Matchi

ng

with the

stated

PEOs

Publi

cation

Project Work under Progress

CAY m1

Mr. Gopala

Krishna A MuNIP –

An OMR

System

Image

Processing

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Research Work

&

Award of BE

degree

YES

YES Mr. Karthik N S

Mr. Vignesh

Chandramouli

Mr. Vatsal

Singahal

Code

Morphing

Compiler

Design

Dr. Suthishn

Kumar

Award of BE

degree NO

Ms. Shruthi

Nayak

Ms. Swathi

Shenoy

Ms. Eshitha H K

Kenneth T Moras

Interactive

Learning

Environmen

t

HCI Jayashree R

Mr. Abhihek

Sharma

Ajith Raj Shetty

Ms. Chethana V P

Mr. Rachit Sood

iRover- an

iPhone

Controlled

wifi rover

Mobile

Communic

ation

Nagasundari

S

Mr. Vinod Kumar

Mr. Sandeep

Mehta

Mr. Patel Kartik



Name of

The

Student(s)

Project

Title

Areas of

Specializat

ion

Project

Supervisor

(s)

Contribution/

Achievements /

Research

Output

Matchi

ng

with the

stated

PEOs

Publi

cation

Mr. Nandish M Sonic

Barcodes

for Visually

Impaired

Artificial

Intelligence Ambika T

Award of BE

degree YES NO

Ms. Nasika S

Bilkhis

Ms. Neetha Bali

B

CAY m2

Mr. Kushal S Location

Based

Information

Retrieval

Image

Processing

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Award of BE

degree YES NO

Mr. Lohit Kumar

A P

Ms. Akshatha Rao

Google

Map Search

on Mobile

Phone

Mobile

Computing

Dr. Suthishn

Kumar

Ms. Aruna S

Ms. Ashwini B

Ms. Rhea

Muddaiah

Mr. Ravikiran S

Document

Parser And

Text

Extractor

Compiler

Design

U P

Narendra

Mr. Sandeep B S

Mr. Vikas K J

Mr. Vishwanath

Sridhar Bhat

Ms. Roshni R Content

Managemen

t System

Information

Systems

U P

Narendra Ms. Sahana

Reddy G

Ms. Greeshma O

G Context

Based

Advertisem

ent

Information

Systems Parimala R

Ms. Deepti

Dandin

Ms. Mamata

Hegde



Table 3.2 Average Projects

CAY

Project Work under Progress

CAY m1

Name of

the

Student(s)

Project

Title

Areas of

Specializ

ation

Project

Supervisor

(s)

Contribution/

Achievements /

Research

Output

Matchi

ng

with

the

stated

PEOs

Public

ation

Mr. Girish R G

Integrated

Software

Suite for

PESIT

Informati

on

Systems

Prof.

Shylaja S S

Award of BE

Degree YES NO

Mr. Mithun

Manjunath

Ms. Divya Arathi

Madhiazhagan

Ms. Harshitha L

Pathi

Ms. Upasana Bahl Surveillanc

e Camera

Synchroniz

ation with

Motion

Sensor and

notification

server

Image

Processin

g

Prof.

Shylaja S S Ms. Tamara

Kallivelil

Mr. Shenoy Chetan

Speech

Recognitio

n

Speech

Recogniti

on

Dr. S

Natarajan

Ms. Sindhuja Gopal

Ms. Suguna

Kamath

Mr. Yogesh

Puneeth

Mr. Rahul S Automated

Attendance

Systems

Using

RFID

RFID Ganga Holi Mr. Ryan D‟souza

Ms. Sahithya B

Ms. Sangeeta S

Mr. Kiran Kumar

R G

Theft Alert

And

Vehicle

Tracking

Using

RFID

RFID A Vinay Mr. Siddarth M

Mr. Raghavendra N

B



CAY m2

Name of

the

Student(s)

Project

Title

Areas of

Specializat

ion

Project

Supervisor

(s)

Contribution/

Achievements /

Research

Output

Matchi

ng

with the

stated

PEOs

Public

ation

Mr. Rahul M V

Face

Detection

Image

Processing

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Award of BE

Degree YES NO

Ms. Rashmi

Naganur

Ms. Smita Verma

Mr. Sujay S

Mr. Aman Kumar Noise

Reduction

Using

Fuzzy

Logic for

Images

Image

Processing

Dr. S

Natarajan

Mr. Abhishek

Kapoor

Mr. Abhishek

Kodankiri

Mr. Ashrith

Mr. Kaushik C RTOS on

dPIC

Embedded

Systems

Embedded

Systems

Dr. S

Natarajan Mr. Praveena N

Shanubhogue

Mr. Karthik

Kumar M Game

Developme

nt using

Direct – X

Computer

Graphics

Dr. S

Natarajan

Mr. Abhishek

Narian

Ms. Aastha

Bhartia

Mr. Chethan .R

Scrum

Project

Manageme

nt Tool

Project

Manageme

nt

Dr. K

Srikanta

Murthy





ANNEXURE 4

Faculty Details

Name of the

Faculty

Designati

on

(administ

rativ e

positions,

if any,)

Qualificat

ion,

Universit

y and

year of

graduatio

n

Areas of

Specializ

ation

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ, nC NJ, NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Dr. K N

Balasubraman

ya Murthy

Professor

(Principal

&

Director)

BE

MTech

Ph. D

Parallel

Algorith

ms

18.08.20

05 0 0 1 11 NIL

Prof. Shylaja

S S

Professor

(Head of

the

Departme

nt)

BE: 1989

BU

M

Tech1993

VTU

DOEACC

„C‟ Level

2000

(Ph.D)

Industrial

Electroni

cs

04.12.19

99 0 3 1 13 NIL

Dr. Suthikshn

Kumar Professor

BE 1989

BU

ME 1991

IIT,

Chennai

Ph.D

2000

Melbourn

e

Reconfig

urable

Neuro

Computer

s

22.11.20

05 0 2 4 4 NIL



Name of the

Faculty

Designatio

n

(administr

ativ e

positions,

if any,)

Qualifica

tion,

Universit

y and

year of

graduati

on

Areas of

Specializa

tion

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ, nC NJ, NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Dr. S.

Natarajan Professor

BSc 1964

Mysore

Universit

y

ME 1966

Bangalor

e

Universit

y

Ph.D

JNTU

Remote

Sensing

11.08.200

6 0 1 3 18 NIL

Ms. Ganga

Holi

Associate

Professor

BE: 1994

GUG

M Tech

:2001

VTU

(Ph.D)

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

18.02.200

6 0 1 0 4 NIL

Ms.

Mamatha H

R

Assistant

Professor

BE 1998

Kuvempu

M Tech

2006

VTU

(Ph.D)

Computer

Network

Engineerin

g

20.02.200

6 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms.

M.V.Padmas

ri

Assistant

Professor

BE 1988

BU

MS 1992

Georgia

State

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

19-02-

2005 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms.

Sangeetha J

Assistant

Professor

BE: 2000

ME: 2006

BU

(Ph.D)

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

23.07.200

7 0 0 0 2 NIL

Mr. C O

Prakash

Senior

Lecturer

BE: 2000

ME: 2006

BU

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

02.08.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL



Name of the

Faculty

Designation

(administra

tiv e

positions, if

any,)

Qualificat

ion,

University

and year

of

graduatio

n

Areas of

Specializa

tion

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ, nC NJ, NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Mr. Karthik

.S

Senior

Lecturer

BE:2004

M Tech :

2007

VTU

(Ph.D)

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

07.02.200

7 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms. Ambika

T Lecturer

BE:2005

M

Tech2009

VTU

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

14.08.200

6 0 0 1 0 NIL

Ms. Sumathi

M Lecturer

BE : 2004

VTU

(M.Tech)

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

29.03.200

7 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms.

Vijayakala Lecturer

B E: 2004

VTU

Informatio

n Science

&

Engineeri

ng

05.07.200

7 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms. Pallavi

C.V Lecturer

BE:

M Tech

Computer

Network

Engineeri

ng

0 0 0 0 NIL

Mr. Vinay A Lecturer

B E: 2007

VTU

(MTech)

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

23.07.200

7 0 2 1 4 NIL

Ms.

Parimala R Lecturer

B E: 2004

VTU

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

27.07.200

7 0 0 0 0 NIL

Mr. Dinesh

H A Lecturer

BE:2007

M Tech :

2009

VTU

Software

Engineeri

ng

17.03.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL



Name of the

Faculty

Designation

(administra

tiv e

positions, if

any,)

Qualificat

ion,

University

and year

of

graduatio

n

Areas of

Specializa

tion

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ, nC NJ, NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Mr. Devaraj

Verma C Lecturer

BE: 2004

M Tech:

2007

VTU

Computer

Science &

Engineeri

ng

01.07.201

0 0 1 1 0 NIL

Mr. Dheeraj

D Lecturer

B. E :

2007

VTU

(MTech)

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

01.07.201

0 0 1 0 1 NIL

Mr.

Vinayaka S

P

Lecturer B. E,

MTech

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

16.07.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms. Usha D Lecturer

BE: 2007

VTU

(ME)

Informatio

n Science

&

Engineerin

g

22.07.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms Mala

Shree S Lecturer

BE: 2008

VTU

(ME)

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

22.07.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL

Ms.

Sharmila

Chidaravalli

Lecturer

BE: 2004

M Tech

2007

VTU

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

26.07.201

0 0 0 0 2 NIL

Ms. P Rama

Devi Lecturer

B. Tech

:2004

M Tech :

2009

JNTU

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

02.08.201

0 0 0 0 1 NIL

Ms Chaitali

Choudhary Lecturer

BE: 2005

(GGDU)

M Tech

:2009

(CSVTU)

Computer

Science &

Engineerin

g

05.08.201

0 0 0 0 1 NIL



Name of the

Faculty

Designation

(administrat

iv e

positions, if

any,)

Qualifica

tion,

Universit

y and

year of

graduati

on

Areas of

Specializa

tion

Date of

joining

the dept;

Load

sharing

with

more

than one

program

s

No. of research

publications in

journals and

conferences

since joining

the

department

and Total no.

of such

publications

nJ, nC NJ,

NC

# of

curren

t R &

D and

consul

tancy

projec

ts and

the

amou

nt

Mr.

Amarnath J

L

Lecturer

BE: 2005

M Tech :

2010

VTU

Software

Engineerin

g

07.09.201

0 0 0 0 0 NIL





ANNEXURE 5

List of Faculty Publications (CAY)

Sl.

No.

Name of the

Person Title of Paper

Publications

Citation

National or

International

1.

Dr. K N

Balasubramanya

Murthy

Statistical

Classification of

Tuberculosis Using

Data Mining

Techniques

International

Conference on

Image Processing

(ICDIP), Bangalore,

India, August 4-

6,2010

International

Conference

2.

Classification of

Tuberculosis using

Ensemble Methods

2010 3rd

IEEE

International

Conference on

Computer Science

and Information

Technology

(ICCSIT), Chengdu,

9-11 July, 2010

3.

Association Rule

Based Tuberculosis

Disease Diagnosis

Second International

Conference on

Digital Image

Processing,

Kamaruzaman,

February 2010

Singapore, pp. 409 –

412, SPIE, Vol.

7546, 75462Y

4.

Aggregation of

Gabor Wavelets and

Curvelet with PCA

for Efficient

Retrieval of Face

Images

Amrita ACM-W

Celebration of

Women in

Computing,

Coimbatore,

Tamilnadu,

ISBN:978-1-4503-

0194-7

5.

Face Recognition

Using Trichotomic

Combination of

SVD, DF-LDA and

LPP

International

Conference on

Computer and

Automation

Engineering,

Singapore, February

26-28, 2010, Ref

978-1-4244- 585-

0/10C 2010IEEE



Sl.

No.

Name of the


Publications

Citation

National or

International

6.

Dr. K N

Balasubramanya

Murthy

Face detection in

color images using

skin color, Laplacian

of Gaussian, and

Euler number

International

Conference on

Digital Image

Processing,

Singapore,

SPIE[7546-81],

February 26-28,

2010, Vol. 754629-

12-8

International

Conference

7.

A Novel Noise

Immune Method for

Skew Detection in

Music Documents

International

Conference on

Semantic

Computing,

Dayananda Sagar

College of

Engineering, April

21- 23, 2010.

8.

Efficient Retrieval of

Face Images Based

on Curvelets and

Singular Value

Decomposition

International

Conference on

Computer and

Network

Technology 2010 ,

Karur, Chennai

International Journal

of Technology and

Engineering

System(IJTES)

pp.114- 119

9.

Face Recognition by

Feedforward Neural

Network using

Laplacian of

Gaussian filter and

Singular Value

Decomposition

2010 First

International

Conference on

Integrated Intelligent

Computing, ICIIC

2010,Bangalore, pp.

56-61.

10.

Location

Recognition on

Camera Embedded

Mobile Phones based

on MPEG-7 Color

Layout Descriptor

MVIPPA-09,

Bangkok, WASET

vol 60 ISSN 2070-

3724, pg895-899.



Sl.

No.

Name of the


Publications

Citation

National or

International

11. Dr. K N

Balasubramanya

Murthy

A smart

automatic

thumbnail

cropping based on

attention driven

regions of interest

extraction

ACM International

Conference

Proceeding Series;

Vol. 403 Proceedings

of the 2nd ICCIT

Seoul, Korea, Pages:

957-962 ,Year of

Publication: 2009

,ISBN:978-1-60558-

710-3.

International

Conference

12.

Prof. Shylaja S

S

Feature

Extraction and

Compression of

face image using

Gabor Filters

Jnanasarovara

National Level

Symposium on

Cutting Edge

Technologies

13.

Comparative

Analysis of Color

Layout Descriptor

& Edge

Histogram

Descriptor

National Conference

on Intelligent

Information Retrieval

14.

Dimensionality

Reduction using

Gaussian Mixture

Model-An

Application to

Face Recognition

National Conference

on Intelligent

Information Retrieval

15.

Aggregation of

Gabor Wavelets

and Curvelet with

PCA for Efficient

Retrieval of Face

Images

Amrita ACM-W

Celebration of

Women in

Computing

16.

Face Recognition

Using

Trichotomic

Combination of

SVD, DF-LDA

and LPP

International

Conference on

Computer and

Automation

Engineering

17.

Face Detection in

Color Images

using Skin Color,

LOG filter and

Euler Number

2nd

International


Image Proceedings in

on 26th February,

2010



Sl.

No.

Name of the


Publications

Citation

National or

International

18.

Prof. Shylaja S S

Efficient Retrieval

of Face Images on

Curvelet and

Singular Value

Decomposition

International

Conference on

Computing,

Communication and

Networking

Technologies

International

Conference

19.

Face Recognition

by Feed forward

Neural Network

using Laplacian of

Gaussian filter

and Singular

Value

Decomposition

First International

Conference on


Computing, ICIIC

2010, Bangalore, pp.

56-61.

20.

Location

Recognition on

Camera

Embedded Mobile

Phones based on

MPEG-7 Color

Layout Descriptor

International

Conference on

Machine Vision,

Image Processing,

and Pattern Analysis

(MVIPPA-09),

Bangkok, WASET

vol 60 ISSN 2070-

3724, pg895-899.

21.

A smart automatic

thumbnail

cropping based on

attention driven

regions of interest

extraction

ACM International

Conference

Proceeding Series;

Vol. 403

,Proceedings of the

2nd ICCIT Seoul,

Korea, Pages: 957-

962 ,Year of

Publication: 2009

,ISBN:978-1-60558-

710-3



Sl.

No.

Name of the

Person Title of Paper Publications Citation

National or

International

22.

Dr.

Suthikshn

Kumar

Developing countries

and information

deficiency

11 International

Conference on Public

communication of

Science and

Technology Dec 6 -10,

2010

International

Conference

23.

Energy Efficient

Track Sector

Routing in Randomly

Deployed Wireless

Sensor Networks.

10th International

Conference on

Networks, January 23-

28, 2011-St. Maarten ,

The Netherlands,

Antilles

24.

Analysis of

Handover

Algorithms Based on

Wrong Decision

Probability Model

10th International

Conference on

Networks, January 23-

28, 2011. St. Maarten,

The Netherland,

Antilles

25.

Programming

Quotient: An

Effective Metric for

Software Engineer‟s

Programming Skills

International

Conference on

Mathematics and

Computer Science, Feb

5-6, 2010, Chennai,

pp.181- 186

26.

Simulation and

Analysis of Modified

Flood Fill Algorithm

for Micromouse


Communication and

Computing

Technologies, NCCT,

Bangalore, Jan 22-23,

2010.

National

Conference

27.

An Analytical

Approach to

Qualitative Aspects

of WiMAX Physical

Layer

Conference on

Information

Technology for Real

World Problems,

Andhra Pradesh, India

December 9-11, 2010

International

Conference

28.

Lifetime

Enhancement

Protocol for cluster

based Wireless

Sensor Network

Fifth Innovative

Conference on

Embedded Systems,

Mobile Communication

and Computing, July

26-28, 2010,

PESIMSR, Kuppam,

India, pg 87-95.

Innovative

Conference



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

29.

Dr.

Suthikshn

Kumar

Threshold Based

Energy Efficient

Adaptive Cluster

Head Selection

Protocol

International

Conference on

Convergence of Science

and Engineering in

Education And

Research- A Global

Perspective In The New

Mellinium”, DSCE

Campus, Bangalore,

April 21-23 2010

International

Conference

30.

Energy Aware

Cluster Based

Wireless Sensor

Network

International

Conference on

Communication,

Computers and Devices

(ICCCD) 2010, IIT

Kharagpur,to be held in

Dec 10-12, Poster

31.

Innovative Teaching

of Software

Engineering:

Practical Approach

with Labs

22nd IEEE-CS

Conference on Software

Engineering Education

and Training (CSEE &

T-09) 17-19, Feb 2009,

Hyderabad, India. Pp.

284 - 287

32.

Acoustic Design of

Classrooms

AES 126th Convention,

May 7-10, 2009,

Munich, Germany,

Paper Id: 7796

33.

ASPARAGUS:

Autonomous Robotic

Explorer for

Acoustic

Measurement of

Classrooms and

Seminar Halls.


Oct 9-12, 2009, New

York, USA, Paper Id:

7895

34.

Innovative Teaching

of Software

Engineering:

Practical Approach

with Labs”

Computer Society of

India Communications,

Feb 2009, Vol 32, Issue

11, pp 18-20

35. Handover in GSM

Networks

Fifth International

Conference on MEMS,

NANO, and Smart

Systems (ICMENS),

2009



Sl.

No.

Name of

the Person Title of Paper Publications Citation

National or

International

36.

Dr.

Suthikshn

Kumar

Acoustic Design of

Classrooms


May 7-10, 2009,

Munich, Germany,

Paper Id: 7796

International

Conference

37.

ASPARAGUS:

Autonomous

Robotic Explorer

for Acoustic

Measurement of

Classrooms and

Seminar Halls.


Oct 9-12, 2009, New

York, USA, Paper Id:

7895

38.

Innovative

Teaching of

Software

Engineering:

Practical Approach

with Labs”

Computer Society of

India Communications,

Feb 2009, Vol 32, Issue

11, pp 18-20

39. Handover in GSM

Networks

Fifth International

Conference on MEMS,

NANO, and Smart

Systems (ICMENS),

2009

40.

Dr. K

Srikanta

Murthy

Application of

Morphological

Operations on

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

for Image

Enhancement

WASET International

conference on Digital

Image Processing,

Rome, Italy from 28-30

April 2010.

International

Conference

41.

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

Enhancement

Using Singular

Value

Decomposition

Third National

Conference on Recent

Research Trends in

Advanced Computing

9th- April – 2010,

Madhurai, India,

RTAC123.

National

Conference

42.

An Effective

Technique to

Enhance the

Degraded

Documents Using

Singular Value

Decomposition and

Adaptive

Thresholding

16th Korea-Japan, Joint

Workshop on Frontiers

of Computer Vision,

Feb. 2010, pp 49-56.



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

43.

Dr. K

Srikanta

Murthy

Novel Approach

on Image Data

Compression

using Radial Basis

Function Network

Fourth International

Conference on

Information Processing

(ICIP-2010), August 6-

8, 2010, Bangalore,

India, pp. 516 -518

International

Conference

44.

Dr. K

Srikanta

Murthy

An approach to

improve Image

Compression

using Radial Basis

Function Neural

Network with

Cumulative

Distribution

Function

14th World

Multiconference on

Systemics, Cybernetics

and Informatics

(WMSCI 2010), June

29th-July 2

nd, 2010,

Orlando, Florida, USA,

pp. 110-115.

International

conference

45.

Vector

Quantization

based Radial Basis

Function Neural

Network with

Cumulative

Distribution

Function for

Efficient Image

Compression

International Congress

on Computer

Applications and

Computational Science

(CACS 2010),

Singapore, 4-6

December 2010

46.

Dr. S

Natarajan

An enhanced

clusterer

aggregation using

nebulous pool

Amrita ACM-W

Celebration of Women

in Computing

47.

A Novel Approach

Using Active

Control Model for

Semi-Automatic

Road Extraction

from High

Resolutions

Satellite Imagery

2010 Second

International

Conference on

Machine Learning and

Computing

48. Association rule

based tuberculosis

disease diagnosis

Second International


Image Processing

49.

Statistical

Classification of

Tuberculosis

Using Data

Mining

Techniques

International

Conference on Image

Processing (ICDIP),

Bangalore, India,

August 4-6,2010

http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1858378.1858439&coll=portal&dl=GUIDE&type=series&idx=SERIES13543&part=series&WantType=Proceedings&title=A2CWiC&CFID=://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&CFTOKEN=www.google.co.in/search?hl=en






Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

50.

Dr. S

Natarajan

Aggregation of

Gabor Wavelets

and Curvelet with

PCA for Efficient

Retrieval of Face

Images

Amrita ACM-W

Celebration of Women

in Computing,

Coimbatore, Tamilnadu

International

conference

51.

Face Recognition

Using Trichotomic

Combination of

SVD, DF-LDA

and LPP

International

Conference on

Computer and

Automation

Engineering, February

26-28, 2010, IEEE

52.

Face detection in

color images using

skin color,

Laplacian of

Gaussian, and

Euler number

International


Image Processing,

Singapore, SPIE[7546-

81], February 26-28,

2010, Vol. 754629-12-

8

53.

A Novel Noise

Immune Method

for Skew

Detection in Music

Documents

International

Conference on

Semantic Computing,

Dayananda Sagar

College of Engineering

54.

Efficient Retrieval

of Face Images

Based on

Curvelets and

Singular Value

Decomposition

International

Conference on

Computer and Network

Technology 2010 ,

Karur, Chennai

55.

Face Recognition

by Feedforward

Neural Network

using Laplacian of

Gaussian filter and

Singular Value

Decomposition

2010 First International

Conference on


Computing, ICIIC

2010,Bangalore, pp.

56-61

56.

Location

Recognition on

Camera Embedded

Mobile Phones

based on MPEG-7

Color Layout

Descriptor

MVIPPA-

09,Bangkok,WASET

vol 60 ISSN 2070-

3724, pg895-899



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

57.

A smart automatic

thumbnail

cropping based on

attention driven

regions of interest

extraction

ACM International

Conference Proceeding

Series; Vol. 403

,Proceedings of the 2nd

ICCIT Seoul, Korea,

Pages: 957-962 ,Year

of Publication: 2009

,ISBN:978-1-60558-

710-3

58.

Dr. S

Natarajan

Road Extraction

from high

resolution satellite

imagery using

morphological

reconstruction

International

Conference on

Artificial Intelligence

and Pattern

Recognition (AIPR-

09) July, 13-16 2009.

To be held on Orlando.

USA.

International

Conference

59. Data Caching

using DSR in Ad

hoc Networks.

National Conference

on Computing,

Communication and

Technology – 2010

(CCT-10) ), Bangalore,

January 22-23

National

Conference

60.

A Novel method

for combining

clusters in Spatial

Cluster ensembles:

a layered merge

approach with

inherent voting

technique.

International

Conference on Image

Processing -2009,

Bangalore, August 7-9,

2009

International

Conference

61. Classification of

Tuberculosis using

Ensemble Methods

ICCSIT, IEEE

Conference, Chengdu,

China, July 9-11, 2010

62.

Association Rule

Based

Tuberculosis

Disease Diagnosis

ICDIP 2010,Singapore,

SPIE, Feb. 26-28 2010

63.

A novel video

segmentation

algorithm with

shadow

cancellation and

adaptive threshold

techniques"

International Journal of

Signal Processing,

Image Processing and

Pattern

Recognition (IJSIP

Vol.2 No.4 December

2009)



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

64.

Dr. S

Natarajan

A novel video

segmentation

algorithm with

shadow

cancellation and

adaptive threshold

techniques

SIP 2009, International

Convention Center, Jeju

Island, Korea, December

10-12, 2009. Volume 61,

304-311 International

Conference

65. Interactive Shell


Knowledge Utsav,

Bangalore, August 2010

66.

Dr. S

Natarajan

Enhancement of

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

Using Curvelet

Transform and

Mathematical

Morphology

International conference

on Computer

Engineering and

Technology, Nov 2010.

International

Conference

67. Line Segmentation

in Handwritten

Text

IEEE International

Conference, Jodhpur,

India

68.

A Combined

Approach for

Degraded

Historical

Documents

Denoising using

Curvelet &

Mathematical

Morphology

International Conference

on Computer

Engineering &

Technology, Dec 28th

,

29th 2010

69.

Ms. Ganga

Holi

An Effective

Technique to

Enhance the

Degraded

Documents Using

Singular Value

Decomposition

and Adaptive

Thresholding

16th Korea - Japan joint

Workshop on frontiers of

computer vision –FCV

2010 pp 50-56, Japan

70.

Application of

Morphological

Operations on

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

for Image

Enhancement

WASET International

conference on Digital

Image Processing,

Rome, Italy from 28-30

April 2010. PP 944-947.



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

71.

Ms. Ganga

Holi

Extraction of Text

Lines from

Handwritten

Kannada

Documents

International

conference on

Computer Engineering

and Technology,

Jodhpur, Nov 2010.

International

Conference

72.

Enhancement of

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

Using Curvelet

Transform and

Mathematical

Morphology

International

conference on


and Technology,

Jodhpur, Nov 2010.

73.

Degraded

Historical

Document Image

Enhancement

Using Singular

Value

Decomposition

Third National

Conference on Recent

Research Trends in

Advanced Computing

9th- April – 2010,

RTAC123. National

Conference

74. Interactive Shell

National Conference

on Knowledge Utsav,

Bangalore, August

2010

75.

Ms.

Sangeetha J

International

Conference on

Computer

Engineering &

Technology, Dec

28th, 29

th

A Survey on IEEE

802.16j Mobile Multi

Hop Relay Networks.

International

Conference 76.

International

Conference on

Computer

Engineering &

Technology, Dec

28th, 29

th 2010

A Comparative study

on Wifi and Wimax

77.

A Survey on IEEE

802.16j Mobile

Multi Hop Relay

Networks.

International

Conference on


& Technology,

Jodhpur, Rajasthan

78. Ms. Ambika

T

Data Caching

using DSR in Ad

hoc Networks

National Conference

on Computing,

Communication and

Technology – 2010

(CCT-10) ), Bangalore,

January 22-23, 2010

National

Conference



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

79.

Mr. Vinay A

Bandwidth Aware

Load Balancing

and Optimal

bandwidth

Allocation

Techniques for

Video-on-Demand

System

IEEE International

Conference on

Communication

Control and Computing

Technologies

International

Conference

80.

Architectural

Solution for

Improving

Performance of

Video-on-Demand

Systems

IEEE International

Conference on Internet

Multimedia Systems

Architecture and

Application 2010

(IMSAA – 2010)

81.

An Efficient Video

Streaming

Architecture for

Video-on-Demand

Systems

International

Conference on

Communication and

Computational

Intelligence (INCOCCI

2010)

82.

A Novel

Framework for

Distributed

Dynamic Load

Balancing in

Video-on-Demand

Systems

International

Conference on

Computer and

Engineering

Technology 2010

(ICCET 2010)

83.

Mr. Devaraj

Verma C

Design of

compressed

memory model for

robotics based on

AVC standard

International Journal of

Computer Science

issues

84. Design of

Computational

Model for Robotics

National Conference

on Artificial

Intelligence and

Software Engineering-

2010

National

Conference

85.

Mr. Dheeraj

D

An Entropy based

approach for

offline signature

verification

International

conference on


and Technology, Nov

2010.

International

Conference

86. Offline signature

verification using

CEQ

National Conference

on Emerging

Technologies in

Computer Science

National

Conference



Sl.

No.

Name of the


National or

International

87. Ms. Usha D

A Novel Approach

to offline signature

verification using

distance classifier

International

conference on


and Technology, Nov

2010.

International

Conference

88. Ms. P

Ramadevi

Enhanced

Clustering

Algorithm based

on Minimum

Spanning Tree

using Divide &

Conquer

Technique

International

Conference on Demand

Computing Oxford

College 2010

89. Ms. Chitali

Enhanced

Clustering

Algorithm based

on Minimum

Spanning Tree

using Divide &

Conquer

Technique

International

Conference on Demand

Computing Oxford

College 2010





ANNEXURE 6

Faculty R & D and Consultancy Details

Sl No. Name of the Faculty Funding Agency /

Company

Consultancy / Project

Proposal

1. Dr. K N Balasubramnya

Murthy

AICTE

Rs. 5 Lakhs Project

2. Prof. Shylaja S S IBM

Rs. 2 Lakhs Consultancy

3. Dr. Srikanta Murthy

AICTE

Rs. 5 Lakhs

IBM

Rs. 1 Lakh

Project

Consultancy

4. Ms. Ganga Holi IBM

Rs. 1 Lakh Consultancy

5. Mr. Karthik S IBM

Rs. 1 Lakh Consultancy





ANNEXURE 7

Facilities and Technical Support

Description of Class rooms, faculty rooms, seminar and conference halls

Room

Description Usage

Shared /


Class Room

No. F101 Class room for 2

nd year

Exclusive

80

Each room Equipped with

the following

01 Green Board,

01 White Board,

01 DLP,

01 Projector

Screen

01 Camera

01 Podium

6‟ Desk 11

8‟ Desk 06

14 Tube Lights

06 Fans

Class Room


rd year

Class Room


rd year

Class Room


nd year

Class Room


th year

Class Room


th year

PG Class

Room /

Tutorial

Room No.

F102 To conduct

classes for M.

Tech Students

and tutorial for

below average

students

36

Each room Equipped with

the following

01 Green Board

01 White Board

01 DLP

01 Projector

Screen

01 Camera

01 Podium,

6‟ Desk 11

8‟ Desk 06

14 Tube Lights

06 Fans

Tutorial

Room No.

F202



Room

Description Usage

Shared /


Seminar Hall

To conduct

Conferences,

Seminars and

Workshops

Shared 150

01 Green Board,

01 White Board,

01 Projector

Screen,

01 Podium,

150 S type chairs

orange,

18 Fans,

40 Tube Lights,

03 Staff Tables,

01 Computer

Table,

01 Wireless

Mike,

01 Collar Mike,

01 Clock

Auditorium

To conduct

Conferences,

Seminars and

Workshops

Shared 1200

120 Ton AC

1200 chairs

2 Green Rooms

Equipped with

lights

High end Sound

systems

Ground Floor

Conference

Room

To conduct

meeting

among faculty

and students

Exclusive

07

01 White Board

07 black chairs

01 Fan

04 Small Tube

Lights

02 Staff Tables

Ground Floor

Conference

Room



Room

Description Usage

Shared /


HOD Room

Occupancy of

HOD for

administrative

work,

preparation to

class

Exclusive

10

01 PC,

01 Laptop,

01 Printer,

Internet speed of

100 Mbps,

01 Book racks,

01 White Board,

02 Staff Tables,

01 Computer

Table,

07 Revolving

Chairs,

02 Fans,

03 Tube Lights,

01 Red Board,

01 Phone,

01 Clock

Department

Office

Office Assistants for Department

work

07

02 PC,

02 Printer,

Internet speed of

100 Mbps,

29 Closed Shelf,

07 Glass Shelf,

03 Open Shelf,

01 Xerox

Machine,

02 Computer

Tables,

01 Xerox

Machine Table

Black Chairs,

02 Phones,

02 OHP,

01 DLP,

04 Laptops, 01

ACS System



Room

Description Usage

Shared /


Ground Floor

Staff Room

Faculty Members for

administrative work,

preparation to class, reading

and other coordination

Exclusive

11

05 PC,

01 Printers,

01 Scanner,

Internet speed of

100 Mbps,

11 Book racks,

08 Big Tube

Lights,

06 Small Tube

Light,

03 Fans,

07 Revolving

Chair,

07 Black Chair,

03 Phones,

01 Standing Fan

Ground Floor

Inner Staff

Room

Faculty Members for

administrative work,

preparation to class, reading

and other coordination

02

02 PC,

02 Printers,

01 Phone,

01 Fan,

01 Tube Light,

01 Revolving

Chair,

03 Black Chairs

First Floor

Staff Room 11

07 PC

04 Printers

Internet speed of

100 Mbps

11 Book racks,

09 Revolving

Chair,

01 Black Chair,

03 Phones ,

08 Big Tube

Lights,

06 Small Tube

Lights,

03 Fans



Room

Description Usage

Shared /


First Floor

Inner KRP

Room

Professors for research work,

preparation to class, reading,

etc.

Exclusive

02

01 PC,

01 Printer,

01 Fan,

01 Tube Light,

01 Revolving

Chair,

03 Black Chairs

First Floor

KRP Room 07

01 PC,

01 Printer,

Internet speed of

100 Mbps, 01

Book racks,

01 White Board,

02 Staff Tables,

01 Computer

Table,

02 Revolving

Chairs,

02 Black Chairs,

02 Fans,

06 Tube Lights,

02 Phones

First Floor

Library

Room

Department Library 04

29 Closed Shelf,

07 Glass Shelf,

03 Open Shelf,

02 Fans,

02 Tube Lights,

01 Staff Table,

02 Black Chairs





ANNEXURE 8

Table 8.1. Continuing Education

Module

Description

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industry

Developed/

organized

by

Duratio

n

Resource

Persons

Target

Audience

Usages and

citation etc.

In CAY M2 2008-09

Innovative

methods of

teaching

computer

science topics

Industry PESIT &

BITES 1 Day

Dr.

Padamnab

an

Krishnan

Faculty

Effective

teaching skills

for enhancing

the teaching

process.

Indo

Australian

Workshop

Institution

Dr.

Suthikshn

Kumar

2 Days Dr. Omkar

Faculty &

Students

from India

and

Australia

Australian

Institute

Interaction

with PESIT –

ISE

Multi-core

Programming Industry

PESIT &

BITES 1 Day

Om

Sachan &

Jaya

Krishna

Faculty &

Students

Introduction to

Mutilcore and

its uses

Mission 10 X Industry PESIT &

WIPRO 1 Week

Wipro

Trainers Faculty

Effective

teaching skills

for enhancing

the teaching

process.

In CAY M1 2009-10

Effective

Programming Institution

Dr. K N

Balasubramn

aya Murthy

and Prof.

Shylaja S S

1 Day

Dr.

Nirmal

Kumar

Sanchiet

Faculty

Guidelines for

effective

program

writing



Module

Description

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industr

y

Developed/

organized

by

Duratio

n

Resource

Persons

Target

Audience

Usages and

citation etc.

Android

Application

Development

Industry

Dr. K N

Balasubramn

aya Murthy

and Prof.

Shylaja S S

2 Days

Trainers

from

Integra

Micro

Systems

Faculty &

Students

Introduction to

Mobile OSs,

Mobile

Application

Development

Interactive

Learning

Tools

Industry Dr. Srikanta

Murthy 2 Days

Mr.

Venkatram

an, CEO

Dr.

Krishnan,

CTO

Faculty &

Students

Usage of

learning tools

Mission 10 X Industry PESIT &

WIPRO 1 Week

Wipro

Trainers Faculty

Effective

teaching skills

for enhancing

the teaching

process.

In CAY 2010-11

NS 2 Industry Prof. Shylaja

S S 3 Days

Mr.

Deepak

Nadig

Faculty &

Students

Hands on

experience and

research focus

IT for Non IT Industry and

Institution

Prof. Shylaja

S S &

Prof. Nithin

V Pujari

3 Days Prof. N S

Kumar Students

Preplacement

training

MOODELS Institution

Dr. K N

Balasubramn

aya Murthy

1 Day

Dr. S S

Prabhu

and Dr.

Chandras

hekar

Ramanath

an

Faculty

Learning

Resource

Management



Table 8.2 New Facility Created

Module

Description

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industry

Developed/

organized

by

Duration Resource

Persons

Target

Audience

Usages and

citation etc.

In CAY m2 2008-09

Interaction

through C++

Discussion

Forum

Institution Prof.

Shylaja S S

6 Days /

Semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Prof.

Shylaja S S

V Semester

Students

Helpful for

placements Interaction

through Data

Structures

Discussion

Forum

Institution Prof.

Shylaja S S

4 Days /

Semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Prof.

Shylaja S S

III

Semester

Students

Health

Informatics Industry

Dr. S

Natarajan

2 Hrs

Each

Mr.

Shreeephad

VI

semester

Students Application of

the Subject in

industry Management

Information

System

Industry Mr.

Dominic.

VI

semester

Students

In CAY m1 2009-10

Interaction

through Data

Structures

Discussion

Forum

Institution Prof.

Shylaja S S

4 Days (2

Hrs /

Day)

Prof.

Shylaja S S

IV

semester

students

Helpful for

placements

Software

Testing Industry

Dr. S

Natarajan

& MS.

Mamatha H

R

2 Hrs

each

Prof. B V

Prasad

VIII

semester

students

Application of

the Subject in

industry

Management

Information

System

Industry

Dr. S

Natarajan

& Mr.

Vinay A

Prof. S

Ramani

VI

semester

Students

J2EE

Programmin

g

Industry

Ms.

Nagasundar

i S & Mr.

Vinay A

Mr. Lobo

Francis

James

VII

semester

Students



Module

Description

Any other

contributory

Inst./Industry

Developed/

organized

by

Duration Resource

Persons

Target

Audience

Usages and

citation etc.

Interaction

through

Unix Shell

Programmin

g

Discussion

Forum

Institution Ms.

Sumathi M

4 Days /

semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Ms.

Sumathi M

IV

semester

students Helpful for

placements

Interaction

through C++

Discussion

Forum

Institution

Ms.

Vijaykala

& Mr.

Vinay. A

4 Days /

semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Ms.

Vijaykala

& Mr.

Vinay. A

IV

semester

students

In CAY 2010-11

System

Software Industry

Prof.

Shylaja S S 2 Hrs

each

Prof.

Ananthram

an

V semester

students Hardcore

knowledge

about the

subject OOP using

C++ Industry

Prof.

Shylaja S S

Prof. N S

Kumar

III

semester

students

Interaction

through C++

Discussion

Forum

Institution Prof.

Shylaja S S

4 Days /

semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Prof.

Shylaja S S

Helpful for

placements

Graph

Theory &

Combinatiric

s

Institution Prof.

Shylaja S S

2 Hrs

each

Dr.

Sudarshan

Iyengar

Hardcore

knowledge

about the

subject

Entrepreneur

ship &

Management

Industry Dr. S

Natarajan

Prof.

Suresh

Babu

VII

semester

students

Acquiring

leadership

Industry Dr. S

Natarajan

Hemanth

Kumar

Innovation,

Creativity,

Technical

Leadership

and

Professional

Excellence-

Madame

Curie

Approach

Industry Mr. Devaraj

Verma C

Dr.

Basavaraj

V & VII

semester

students

Interaction

through C

Forum

Institution Ms.

Vijaykala

4 Days /

semester

(2 Hrs /

Day)

Ms.

Vijaykala

I semester

students

Helpful for

placements





ANNEXURE 9

OVERALL IMPROVEMENTS

In CAY m2 2008-09

Specify the

improveme

nt

Improvement brought in Contribute

d by

List of

PEO(s),

which are

strengthe

ned

Comments, if any

Theory

Introduction of subjects in

the upcoming areas /

technologies (industry

specific courses)

Members of

BOS &

DPAC

Committees

1, 2 & 3

Analytical ability and

Conceptual Knowledge

increased

Labs

Introduction of new labs like

Operating Systems Lab and

Object Oriented Analysis &

Design Lab

1 & 2

Provides hands on

experience of theoretical

concepts

Special

Topic

Introduction of 2 credit self

learning course called

special topics that enhances

major PEOs

1, 2, 3, 4

& 5

Inculcates self learning,

method of report

preparation

Seminars

Introduction of 1 credit

seminar work to introduce

different areas of research

1, 2, 3, 4

& 5

Exposes students to

different research domains

Project

Work

Introduction of 24 credit full

time project work that can be

carried out at industry.

1, 2, 3, 4

& 5

Exposes students to work

environment of software

industry.

Electives

Domain Specific electives

that nurture the technical

knowledge of the students

1, 2 & 3

Tuned towards focus on

higher education in

specific domains

Forums

Discussion forums in

subjects like C++ and Data

Structures

Faculty

members

and students

1, 2 & 5 Pre placement Training

Guest

Lectures

Understating Application

Perspective of subjects like

MIS

Invited

People from

Academia /

Industry

1, 2 & 4

Enhancing

understandability of

hardcore topics

Buddy

System

A pre-placement activity to

increase employability

VII

Semester

students and

Alumni

1, 2, 3 & 5 Increase in placements

(T1 & T2)



In CAY m1 2009-10

Specify

the

improve

ment

Improvement brought in Contribute

d by

List of

PEO(s),

which

are

strength

ened

Comments, if any

Theory

Introduction of subjects in the

upcoming areas / technologies

(industry specific courses)

Members

of

BOS &

DPAC

Committee

s

1, 2 & 3

Analytical ability and

Conceptual Knowledge

increased

Labs


Operating Systems Lab,

Microcontroller Lab, Advanced

Java Lab, Object Oriented

Analysis & Design Lab

1 & 2

Provides hands on

experience of theoretical

concepts

Special

Topic


learning course called special

topics that enhances major PEOs

1, 2, 3,

4& 5

Inculcates self learning &

also imbibed research

culture at UG level

leading to research

publications

Seminar

s

Introduction of 1 credit seminar

work to introduce different areas

of research

1, 2, 3, 4

& 5

Exposes students to

different research

domains

Project

Work

Introduction of 24 credit full time

project work that can be carried

out at industry.

1, 2, 3, 4

& 5



industry.

Electives

Domain Specific electives that

nurture the technical knowledge of

the students.

Technical subjects like Open

Source Systems and Management

subjects like TQM were opted.

1, 2 & 3

Students can opt even

interdisciplinary electives

at institution level.

Forums

Discussion forums in subjects like

C++, Data Structures, Unix Shell

Programming.

Faculty

members

and

students


Guest

Lectures

Understating Application

Perspective of subjects like MIS,

Software Testing and J2EE

Invited

People

from

Academia /

Industry

1, 2 & 4

Enhancing

understandability of

hardcore topics

Buddy

System



VII

Semester

students

and Alumni

1, 2, 3 &

5

Increase in placements

(T1 & T2)



In CAY 2010-11

Specify

the

improve

ment

Improvement brought in Contrib

uted by

List of

PEO(s),

which

are

strengt

hened

Comments, if any

Labs


Operating Systems Lab,

Microcontroller Lab, Advanced

Java Lab, Object Oriented

Analysis & Design Lab

Member

s of

BOS &

DPAC

Committ

ees

1 & 2 Provides hands on experience

of theoretical concepts

Special

Topic


learning course called special

topics that enhances major

PEOs

1, 2, 3,

4& 5

Inculcates self learning & also

imbibed research culture at

UG level leading to research

publications

Seminars

Introduction of 1 credit seminar

work to introduce different

areas of research

1, 2, 3,

4 & 5

Exposes students to different

research domains

Project

Work

Introduction of 24 credit full

time project work that can be

carried out at industry.

1, 2, 3,

4 & 5



industry.

Electives

Domain Specific electives that

nurture the technical knowledge

of the students.

Specific electives like Mobile

Systems Engineering,

Cryptography & Network

Security, Multicore

Programming with labs

sessions being introduced to

enhance classroom learning

1, 2 & 3

Students can opt even

interdisciplinary electives at

institution level.

Forums

Discussion forums in subjects

like C++, Data Structures, Unix

Shell Programming.

Faculty

members

and

students


Expert

Lectures

Guest lectures by experts from

industry and academia in

subjects like GTC, C++,

System Software

Invited

People

from

Academi

a /

Industry

1, 2 & 4 Enhancing understandability

of hardcore topics

Buddy

System



VII

Semester

students

and

Alumni

1, 2, 3

& 5

Increase in placements (T1 &

T2) and internship projects

(95%)





ANNEXURE 10

Table 10.1 Course Modules for 2009 – 2013 Batch

Course

Units Science/HSS

/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignment

s/

tests

needed

to meet

objectives?

Comment

s

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credits

Linear Algebra 5

--

Science

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

NIL

4

Discrete Mathematics

& Combinatorics

5 --

3

Digital Design

(Theory & Laboratory)

5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

Data Structures


5 12

4 1

OOP with C++


5 12

4 1

Computer Architecture

and Organization

5 --

4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics

5 -- Science

4

Analysis and Design of

Algorithms


5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

Object oriented

Programming using

Java


5 12

4 1

System Software 5

-- 4

Microcontrollers


5 12

4 1

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 --

3

Data Communications 5

-- 4

Operating Systems


5 12

4 1

Compiler Design 5

-- 4

Web Technologies


5 12

4 1



Course

Units Science/HSS

/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignment

s/

tests

needed

to meet

objectives?

Comment

s

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credits

Database Management

Systems


5

6 + 1

mini

project

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

NIL

4 1

Special Topics -- -- Self

Learning

Course

1 CIE and

1 SEE 2

Computer Networks


5 12

Professional

Core

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

4 1

Unix System

Programming


5 12

4 1

Principles of

Programming

Languages


5 12

4 1

Software Engineering 5

-- 4

Management

Information Systems

5 --

Group A

Elective

4

XML 5

-- 4

Operations Research 5 --

4

Multimedia

Computing

5 --

4

Multicore

Programming

5

-- 4

Special Topics -- -- Self

Learning

Course

1 CIE and

1 SEE 2

Seminar --

--

Breadth 1 CIE and

1 SEE

1

Project Work -- --

24




Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliatin

g

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignment

s/

tests

needed

to meet

objectives?

Comment

s

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credits

Linear Algebra 5

--

Science

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

NIL

4

Discrete Mathematical

Structures

5 --

3

Digital Design Theory

& Laboratory

5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

Data Structures Theory

& Laboratory

5 12

4 1

Unix Shell Prgmg

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

4 1


and Organization

5 --

4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics II

5 --

Science 4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5 --

3

OOP using C++

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Project

4 1

Microprocessors

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

4 1


-- 4

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 --

4

Operating Systems


5 12

4 1


-- Professional

Core 4


Algorithms (Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12

4 1



Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliatin

g

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignment

s/

tests

needed

to meet

objectives?

Comments

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credits

Special Topics --

-- Self Learning

Course

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

1 CIE and

1 SEE

NIL

2

Computer Networks


5 12

Professional

Core

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

4 1

Unix System

Programming (Theory

& Laboratory)

5 12

4 1

Advanced Java

Programming


5 12

4 1

Principles of

Programming

Languages

5

-- 4

Programming the Web 5

--

Group A

Elective

4

Compiler Design 5

-- 4


4

Multimedia

Computing

5 --

4

Multicore

Programming

5 --

4

Software Project

Management

5 --

4

Special Topics --

-- Self Learning

Course

1 CIE and

1 SEE 2

Data Mining &

Warehousing


5

6 + 1

mini

project

Professional

Core

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

4 1

Object Oriented

Modeling and Design


5

10 + 1

Mini

Project

4 1



Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliatin

g

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignment

s/

tests

needed

to meet

objectives?

Comment

s

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credits

Mobile Computing


5 12 Professional

Core

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses NIL

4 1

CSPA 5 --

Group B

Elective

4

Digital Image

Processing

5 --

4

Adhoc Sensor

Networks

5

-- 4

Web2.0 5 --

4

Entrepreneurship &

Management

5

-- 4

XML 5 --

4

Enterprise Resource

Planning

5 --

Group C

Elective

4

Network Security &

Cryptography

5

-- 4

Natural Language

Processing

5 --

4

Embedded Computing

System

5

-- 4

Cloud Computing 5 --

4

Algorithms of

Intelligent Web

5 --

4

Term Paper --

-- Self Learning

Course

1 CIE and

1 SEE 2

Seminar --

--

Breadth 1 CIE and

1 SEE

1

Project Work --

--

24




Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignments/

tests needed

to meet

objectives?

Commen

ts Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credit

s

Linear Algebra 5

--

Science

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

NIL

4


Structures

5 --

4

Digital Design Theory

& Laboratory

5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

OOP using C++

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

4 1

Unix and Shell

Programming Theory &

Laboratory

5 12

4 1


and Organization

5 --

4

Complex Analysis,

PDE and Numerical

Methods

5 -- Science

4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5 --

4

Data Structures Theory

& Laboratory

5 12

Professional

Core

4 1

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Project

4 1

Microprocessors

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

4 1


-- 4

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 --

Professional

Core

4

Operating Systems


5 12

4 1


-- 4



Laboratory)

5 12

4 1



Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignments/

tests needed

to meet

objectives?

Commen

ts

Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credit

s

System Software


5

6 + 1

Mini

Project

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

NIL

4 1

Special Topic -- -- Self Learning

Course

1 CIE and 1

SEE

Computer Networks


5 12

Professional

Core

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses

YES

4 1

Unix System

Programming (Theory

& Laboratory)

5 12

4 1

Programming in Java


5 12

4 1

Software Testing 5

--

Group A

4

Open Source Systems 5

-- 4

Data Mining and

Warehousing

5 --

4

Operations Research 5

-- 4

Artificial Intelligence 5

--

Group B 4

Distributed Systems 5

-- 4

Computer Graphics 5

-- Professional

Core

Multimedia Computing 5

-- 4

Seminar --

-- Self Learning

Course

1 CIE and 1

SEE

1

Special Topic --

-- 2



Course

Units Science/HSS/

Professional

Core,

Elective

or Breadth?

PEOs

specified

by

Affiliating

Univ. or

the

College?

Additional

theory/lab/

assignments/

tests needed

to meet

objectives?

Comment

s Theory

Units

Lab

Units

Credits Credit

s

Web Technologies


5 12

Professional

Core

PEOs

specified

by the

College as

per the

guidelines

of the

Affiliating

University

YES

2 CIEs, 1

Quiz and

SEE

conducted

for all the

courses NIL

4 1

Object Oriented

Modeling and Design


5

10 + 2

Mini

Project

s

4 1

Mobile Computing


5 12

4 1

Network Management 5

--

Group C

4

Digital Image

Processing

5 --

4

Natural Language

Processing

5 --

4

XML Technologies 5 --

4

Entrepreneurship and

Management

5 --

4

Enterprise Resource

Planning

5 --

Group D

4

Network Security and

Cryptography

5 --

4

Adhoc Sensor

Networks

5 --

4

Compiler Design 5

-- 4

Seminar -- --

Breadth 1 CIE and 1

SEE

1 --

Project Work

-- --

-- 24





ANNEXURE 11

Table 11.1: List of Course Modules for 2009 – 2013 Batch

Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)

Additional contents to

meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers

Theory Lab Theory Lab

Assig

nmen

t /

Test

Linear Algebra 4 --

Excellent

-- -- YES Assignments

to enhance

learning Discrete Mathematics &

Combinatorics 3 -- -- --- YES

Digital Design

(Theory & Laboratory) 4

12 --- YES YES

Lab

Instructions 1

Data Structures


5 12 -- --- --- ---

4 1

OOP with C++


5 12 -- -- -- ---

4 1


and Organization

5 -- YES -- -- Tutorials

4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics

5 -- -- -- YES

Assignments

to enhance

learning 4


Algorithms


5 12 -- --- YES --

4 1

Object oriented

Programming using Java


5 12

-- --- YES

Mini Projects

to enhance

technical

knowledge 4 1

System Software 5

-- -- YES -- Additional

Lab 4

Microcontrollers


5 12 -- YES --

Lab

Instructions 4 1

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 -- -- -- -- --

3


-- -- --- --- --- 4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Operating Systems


5 12

Excellent

-- -- YES

Assignments

to enhance

learning 4 1

Compiler Design 5

-- -- -- -- --- 4

Web Technologies


5 12 -- -- -- ---

4 1

Database Management

Systems (Theory &

Laboratory)

5

6 + 1

mini

project -- -- -- --

4 1

Special Topics -- --

-- -- -- -- 2

Computer Networks


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Unix System

Programming


5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

Principles of

Programming Languages


5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1


-- -- -- YES Case studies

as

assignments

4

Management Information

Systems

5 -- -- -- YES

4

XML 5

-- -- YES -- Additional

Lab

rstanding 4


-- -- -- YES

Assignments

to enhance

learning 4


-- -- -- -- -- 4

Multicore Programming 5

-- -- -- -- -- 4


-- -- -- -- 2



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Data Mining &

Warehousing


5

6 + 1

mini

project

Excellent

-- -- -- --

4 1

OOMD (Theory &

Laboratory)

5 10+ 2

mini

project

1

-- -- YES Case studies 4

Mobile Computing


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Computer System

Performance Analysis

5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Digital Image Processing

5

-- -- YES ---

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Adhoc Sensor Networks 5 -- -- -- -- --

4

Web2.0 5 -- -- -- -- --

4

Entrepreneurship &

Management

5 -- -- -- YES

Case studies

as

assignments

to enhance

learning

4

Enterprise Resource

Planning

5

-- -- -- YES 4

Network Security &

Cryptography

5

-- -- YES --

Mini

projects to

implement

the

knowledge

gained

4

Natural Language

Processing

5 -- -- -- -- --

4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Embedded Computing

System

5

--

Excellent

-- -- -- -- 4

Cloud Computing

5

-- -- YES --

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Algorithms of Intelligent

Web

5 -- -- -- -- --

4

Term Paper 2 -- -- ---- -- --

Seminar 1 -- -- -- -- --

Project Work -- 24 -- -- -- --




Course

Units Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessmen

t

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignmen

t

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Linear Algebra 5

--

Excellent

-- -- YES Assignmen

ts to

enhance

learning

4


Structures

5 -- -- --- YES

3

Digital Design Theory &

Laboratory

5 12 --- YES --

Lab

Instructions 4 1

Data Structures Theory &

Laboratory

5 12 -- --- --- --

4 1

Unix and Shell


Laboratory

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1


and Organization


4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics II

5 -- -- -- YES

Assignmen

ts to

enhance

learning

4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5 -- -- --- YES

3

Object Oriented

Programming using C++

Theory & Laboratory

5 12

-- --- -- -- 4 1

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Projec

t

-- -- -- --

4 1

Microprocessors Theory

& Laboratory

5 12 -- YES --

Lab

Instructions 4 1

Software Engineering

5

-- -- -- YES

Case

studies as

assignment 4

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 -- -- --- --- --

4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessmen

t

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test


--

Excellent

-- -- -- -- 4



Laboratory)

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

System Software


5

6+1

Mini

projec

t

-- -- -- --

4 1

Special Topics --

-- -- -- -- -- 2

Computer Networks


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Unix System

Programming (Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

Advanced Java

Programming


5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

Principles of


5 -- -- -- YES

Case

studies 4

Programming the Web 5

-- -- YES -- Mini

projects 4

Compiler Design 5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Operations Research 5 -- -- -- -- --

4


-- -- -- -- -- 4


-- -- -- -- -- 4

Software Project

Management

5 -- -- -- -- --

4

Special Topics --

-- -- -- -- -- 2



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Data Mining &

Warehousing


5

6 + 1

mini

projec

t

Excellent

-- -- -- --

4 1

Object Oriented

Modeling and Design


5

10 + 1

Mini

Projec

t -- -- -- --

4 1

Mobile Computing


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

CSPA 5 -- -- -- -- --

4


5

-- -- YES ---

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Adhoc Sensor Networks 5 -- -- -- -- --

4

Web2.0

5

-- -- YES ---

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Entrepreneurship &

Mgmt.

5 -- -- -- YES Case studies

4

XML

5

-- -- YES --

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assi

gnm

ent /

Test

Enterprise Resource

Planning

5

--

Excellent

-- -- YES

Case studies

as

assignments

to enhance

learning

4

Network Security &

Cryptography

5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Natural Language

Processing

5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Embedded Computing

System

5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Cloud Computing

5

-- -- YES --

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Algorithms of Intelligent

Web 4 -- -- -- -- --

Term Paper 2 -- -- -- -- --

Seminar 1 -- -- -- -- --

Project Work -- 24 -- -- -- --




Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessmen

t

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assign

ment /

Test

Linear Algebra 5

--

Excellent

-- -- YES Assignment

s to

enhance

learning

4


Structures

5 -- -- --- YES --

3


Laboratory

5 12 --- YES --

Lab

Instructions 4 1

Object Oriented


Theory & Laboratory

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

Unix and Shell


Laboratory

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1


and Organization


4

Complex Analysis, PDE

and Numerical Methods

5 -- -- -- YES

Assignment

s to

enhance

learning

4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5 -- -- --- YES --

3


Laboratory

5 12 -- --- -- --

4 1

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Projec

t

-- -- -- --

4 1


& Laboratory

5 12 -- YES --

Lab

Instructions 4 1


5

-- -- -- YES

Case

studies as

assignment 4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessmen

t

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assig

nme

nt /

Test

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 --

Excellent

-- --- --- -- 4

Operating Systems


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1


-- -- -- -- -- 4



Laboratory)

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

System Software


5

6 + 1

Mini

Projec

t

-- -- -- --

4 1

Special Topic -- -- -- -- -- --

Computer Networks


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Unix System


Laboratory)

5 12

-- -- -- -- 4 1

Programming in Java


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Software Testing 5

-- -- -- -- -- 4


-- -- YES -- Mini

projects 4

Data Mining and

Warehousing

5

-- -- -- YES

Case

studies as

assignment 4


-- -- -- -- -- 4


-- -- -- -- -- 4


-- -- -- -- -- 4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessmen

t

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assig

nme

nt /

Test

Computer Graphics 5

--

Excellent

-- YES -- --


-- -- -- -- -- 4

Seminar --

-- -- -- -- -- 1

Special Topic --

-- -- -- -- -- 2

Web Technologies


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Object Oriented

Modeling and Design


5

10 + 2

Mini

Project

s -- -- -- --

4 1

Mobile Computing


5 12 -- -- -- --

4 1

Network Management 5

-- -- -- -- -- 4


5

-- -- YES --

Mini

projects to

implement

the

conceptual

knowledge

gained

4

Natural Language

Processing

5 -- -- -- -- --

4

XML Technologies 5 -- -- YES --

Mini

projects 4


Management

5 -- -- -- YES Case

studies as

assignment

4

Enterprise Resource

Planning

5 -- -- -- YES

4


Cryptography

5 -- -- -- -- --

4



Course

Units

Quality of

PEOs

specified?

(Poor /

Avg /

Good /

Excellent)


meet objectives?

Assessment

through

Course

files/Lab

and

assignment

sheets/Test

papers


Assig

nme

nt /

Test

Adhoc Sensor Networks 5

--

Excellent

-- -- -- -- 4

Compiler Design 5

-- -- -- -- -- 4

Seminar -- --

-- -- -- -- 1 --

Project Work -- --

-- -- -- -- -- 24





ANNEXURE 12

PROGRAMME EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES & COURSE OBJECTIVES

1. Students will gain the ability to identify, formulate, and solve challenging IT

problems.

2. Students will develop professional skills that prepare them for immediate

employment or master‟s in Information Science and related disciplines.

3. Students will be provided with an educational foundation that prepares them

for leadership roles along diverse career paths.

4. Students will develop an understanding of the social and human context in

which their engineering contributions will be utilized.

5. Students will learn to communicate their ideas to be effective in collaboration

with other members of engineering teams.

PROGRAM AND COURSE OUTCOMES

1. A strong foundation in core Information Science and Engineering, both

theoretical and applied concepts.

2. An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering to

real-world problems.

3. Ability to model, understand, and develop complex software and information

management systems.

4. An ability to function effectively within teams.

5. An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility

6. An ability to communicate effectively, both in writing and oral.

7. The broad education necessary to understand the impact of Information

Science and Engineering solutions in the societal and human context

8. A recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning

9. A knowledge of contemporary issues

Note: Further OB indicates Objectives and OC indicates outcomes




Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Linear Algebra √ √ √ √ √ √

Discrete

Mathematics &

Combinatorics

√ √ √ √ √ √

Digital Design

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Data Structures

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

OOP with C++

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Architecture and

Organization

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Methods of

Applied

Mathematics

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

Analysis and

Design of

Algorithms

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Object oriented

Programming

using Java (Theory

& Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

System Software √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Microcontrollers

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Finite Automata

and Formal

Languages

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Data

Communications √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Operating Systems

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Compiler Design √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Web Technologies

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Database

Management

Systems

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topics √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Networks

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Unix System

Programming

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Principles of

Programming

Languages

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Software

Engineering √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Management

Information

Systems

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

XML √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Operations

Research √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topic √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Seminar √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √




Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9


Discrete

Mathematical

Structures

√ √ √ √ √ √

Digital Design

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Data Structures

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Unix and Shell

Programming

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Architecture and

Organization

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Methods of

Applied

Mathematics II

√ √ √ √ √ √

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics √ √ √ √ √ √

Object Oriented

Programming

using C++ Theory

& Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Database

Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Microprocessors

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

Software

Engineering √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Finite Automata

and Formal

Languages

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

Operating Systems

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Data

Communications √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Analysis and

Design of

Algorithms

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

System Software

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topics √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Networks

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Unix System

Programming

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Advanced Java

Programming

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Principles of

Programming

Languages

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Programming the

Web √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √


Operations

Research √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Multimedia

Computing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Multicore

Programming √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Software Project

Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topics √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Data Mining &

Warehousing

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Object Oriented

Modeling and

Design

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Mobile Computing

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

CSPA √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Digital Image

Processing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Adhoc Sensor

Networks √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Web2.0 √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Entrepreneurship

& Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

XML √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Enterprise

Resource Planning √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Network Security

& Cryptography √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Natural Language

Processing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Embedded

Computing System √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Cloud Computing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Algorithms of

Intelligent Web √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Term Paper √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Seminar √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Project Work √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √




Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9


Discrete

Mathematical

Structures

√ √ √ √ √ √

Digital Design

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Object Oriented

Programming

using C++ Theory

& Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Unix and Shell

Programming

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Architecture and

Organization

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Complex Analysis,

PDE and

Numerical

Methods

√ √ √ √ √ √ √

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics √ √ √ √ √ √

Data Structures

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Database

Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Microprocessors

Theory &

Laboratory

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Software

Engineering √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Finite Automata

and Formal

Languages

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Operating Systems

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Data

Communications √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Analysis and

Design of

Algorithms

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

System Software

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topic √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Networks

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Unix System

Programming

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Programming in

Java

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Software Testing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Open Source

Systems √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Data Mining and

Warehousing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Operations

Research √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Artificial

Intelligence √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Distributed

Systems √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Computer

Graphics √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Multimedia

Computing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √



Course OB

1

OB

2

OB

3

OB

4

OB

5

OC

1

OC

2

OC

3

OC

4

OC

5

OC

6

OC

7

OC

8

OC

9

Seminar √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Special Topic √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Web Technologies

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Object Oriented

Modeling and

Design

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Mobile Computing

(Theory &

Laboratory)

√ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Network

Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Digital Image

Processing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Natural Language

Processing √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

XML

Technologies √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Entrepreneurship

and Management √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Enterprise

Resource Planning √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Network Security

and Cryptography √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Adhoc Sensor

Networks √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √


Seminar √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √

Project Work √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √ √





ANNEXURE 13

Table 13. 1 Faculty List for 2009-2013 Batch

Course

Units

Area of

specialization

needed to

achieve PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Linear Algebra 5

-- Mathematics Ms. Aparna B S

NIL

4

Discrete Mathematics

& Combinatorics

5 --

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ambika T, Ms.

Ganga Holi 3

Digital Design

(Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12

Mr. Vinayaka S P 4 1

Data Structures

(Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12 Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms.

Ganag Holi, Ms.

Sangeetha J, 4 1

OOP with C++

(Theory &

Laboratory)


Sangeetha J, Ms.

Vijayakala, Mr. Vinay. A 4 1

Computer

Architecture and

Organization

5

--

Prof. Shylaja S S, Ms.

Ambika T, Ms. Sharmila

& Ms. Usha D 4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics

5 -- Mathematics Ms. Renna Sultana

4

Analysis and Design

of Algorithms

(Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12 Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering


Ganaga Holi, Ms.

Sangeetha J Ms.

Vijayakala & Ms. P

Ramadevi

4 1



Course

Units

Area of

specialization

needed to

achieve PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Object oriented

Programming using

Java (Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr.

Karthik S, Mr. Dinesha

H A & Ms. Chaitalli

NIL

4 1

System Software

5

--

Prof. Shylaja S S, Mr.

Karthik S, Ms. Mamatha

H R, Mr. Dheeraj D 4

Microcontrollers

(Theory &

Laboratory)

5 12 Ms. Usha D & Ms.

Sharmila C 4 1

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5

--

Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr.

Karthik, Mr. Devaraj

Verma C 3




Course

Units Area of

specialization

needed to

achieve

PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Linear Algebra

5

-- Mathematics Ms. Deepthy Rao

NIL

4

Discrete

Mathematical

Structures

5

--

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Ambika T Ms. Nandini S 3

Digital Design

Theory &

Laboratory

5 12

Ms. Namitha M V 4 1

Data Structures

Theory &

Laboratory


Ganga Holi, Ms.

Sangeetha J 4 1

Unix and Shell

Programming

Theory &

Laboratory


Sumathi M, Ms.

Vijayakala, Ms. Parimala 4 1

Computer

Architecture and

Organization

5

-- Ms. Ambika T, 4

Methods of Applied

Mathematics II

5

-- Mathematics Ms. Deepthy Rao & Ms.

Vrinda Kamath 4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5

--

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Ambika T 3

Object Oriented

Programming using

C++ Theory &

Laboratory

5 12


Sangeetha J, Ms.

Vijaykala, Mr. Vinay A 4 1



Course

Units

Area of

specializati

on needed

to achieve

PEOs

specified

by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Project

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering

/ Software

Engineering

Prof. Shyalaja S S , Dr. S

Natarajan, Ms. Mamatha

H R, Ms. Sumathi

NIL

4 1


& Laboratory

5 12

Ms. Bharathi 4 1


5

--

Dr. Suthikshn Kumar,

Dr. S Natarajan, Mr.

Surya Prakash, Mr.

Vinay A 4

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5

--

Ms. Ganag Holi, Mr.

Karthik S, Mr. Devaraj

Verma C 4

Operating Systems



Padamashree M V, Mr.

Vinay A & Mr.

Vinayaka S P 4 1

Data Communications

5

--

Ms. Padmashree M V,

Mr. Vinay A, Mr. Devraj

Verma C 4



Laboratory)


Ganga Holi, Ms.

Ramadevi P 4 1

System Software


5

6+1

Mini

project


Mamatha H R, Mr.

Karthik S, Mr. Dheeraj

D 4 1


All Faculty Members 2 --



Course

Units

Area of

specializati

on needed

to achieve

PEOs

specified

by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments

Theory Lab

Computer Networks


5 12

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering

/ Software

Engineering


Dr. S Natarajan, Ms.

Mamatha H R, Ms

Sangeetha J

NIL

4 1

Unix System


Laboratory)


Ganga Holi, Ms.

Parimala R 4 1

Advanced Java

Programming


5 12 Ms. Ganag Holi,

Mr. Karthik S, 4 1

Principles of


5

--

Ms. Sangeetha J, Mr.

Vinay A, Ms. Parimala R 4

Programming the Web

5

--

Ms. Ganag Holi, Mr.

Karthik S, Ms.

Malashree 4

Compiler Design

5

--

Mr. Karthik S, Mr.

Devraj Verma C, Mr.

Dheeraj D 4


Mr. Karthik S , Mr.

Vinayak S P 4


-- Dr. S Natarajan, Mr.

Karthik S 4


-- Ms. Ambika T 4

Special Topics --

-- All Faculty Members 2




Course

Units

Area of

specializatio

n needed to

achieve

PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments Theor

y Lab

Linear Algebra 5

-- Mathematics Ms. Vrunda Kamath

NIL

4


Structures

5 --

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ambika T, Ms.

Nandini S 3


Laboratory

5 12 Dr. Srikanta Murthy

K 4 1

Object Oriented


Theory & Laboratory

5 12 Prof. Shylaja S S,

Ms. Usha, Ms.

Vijaykala Mr. Vinay

A,

4 1

Unix and Shell


Laboratory


Ms. Deepthi K

Prasad, Ms. Sumathi

M, Ms. Parimala R 4 1


and Organization

5

-- Ms. Nagasundari S,

Ms. Ambika T 4

Complex Analysis, PDE

and Numerical Methods

5 -- Mathematics Ms. Aparana

4

Graph Theory and

Combinatorics

5

--

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering

Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Ambika T, Ms.

Nandini S 3


Laboratory


Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Sangeetha J 4 1

Database Management

Systems Theory &

Laboratory

5

6 + 1

Mini

Project

Dr. S Natarajan, Ms.

Mamatha H R, Ms.

Sumathi M, Ms.

Parimala R 4 1

Microprocessors Theory &

Laboratory

5 12 Ms. Poornima

Lokesh, 4 1


5

--

Dr. SrikantaMurthy

K, Dr. Suthkishn

Kumar, Mr.

Narendra U P, Mr.

Vinay. A

4



Course

Units

Area of

specializatio

n needed to

achieve

PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments Theor

y Lab

Finite Automata and

Formal Languages

5 --

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering

/ Software

Engineering

Ms. Ganga Holi, Mr.

Karthik S

NIL

4

Operating Systems


5 12 Ms. Padmashree M V,

Mr. Vinay A 4 1

Data Communications

5

--

Ms. Padmashree M V,

Ms. Sangeetha J, Mr.

Vinay A 4



Laboratory)

5 12 Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Vijaykala 4 1

System Software


5

6 + 1

Mini

Project


Mamatha H R, Mr.

Karthik S 4 1

Special Topic -- -- All Faculty Members

Computer Networks


5 12 Ms. Padmashree, ,

Ms. Sangeetha J 4 1

Unix System


Laboratory)


Ganga Holi, Ms.

Parimala R 4 1

Programming in Java


5 12 Ms. Ganga Holi, Ms.

Nagasundari S, Mr.

Karthik S 4 1


-- Mr. Harihara,

Mr.Vinay 4

Data Mining and

Warehousing

5 -- Dr. S Natarajan

4


-- Mr. Karthik S 4


-- Dr. S Natarajan 4


-- Mr. Vinay A, Ms.

Parimala R, Ms.

Meera V, 4



Course

Units

Area of

specializatio

n needed to

achieve

PEOs

specified by

Name of the faculty

whose expertise

matched with the

specialization

Comments Theor

y Lab


--

Information

Science /

Computer

Science /

Computer

Networks /

Computer

Engineering /

Software

Engineering


Karthik S

NIL

4

Seminar --


Special Topic --


Web Technologies


5 12 Ms. Chaitali C & Ms.

Malashree S 4 1

Object Oriented Modeling

and Design


5

10 + 2

Mini

Project

s

Ms. Padamashree M

V, Mr. Vinay A, Mr.

Dinesha H A

4 1

Mobile Computing


5 12 Dr. Suthikshn Kumar,

Mr. Prakash C O 4 1

XML Technologies 5 -- Mr. Surya Prakash

4


Management

5 --


Vinay. A 4


Cryptography

5 --


Ms. Sangeetha J 4

Adhoc Sensor Networks 5

-- Mr. Amarnath J L,

Ms. Usha D 4

Compiler Design

5

--

Mr. Karthik S, Mr.

Dheeraj, Mr. Devraj

Verma C 4

Seminar -- --

All Faculty Members 1 --

Project Work -- --

All Faculty Members -- 24





ANNEXURE 14



BE II, IV, VI Semester (Autonomous scheme) Session: Jan – May 2011

Wee

k No

Mont

h

Day No.

of

wor

king

days

Activities Mon Tue

We

d Thu Fri Sat

1. Jan 17 18 19 20

21

FA

M

22 5

17th

- Commencement of

classes, course

registration

2. Jan 24

25

EW

D

26

H 27 28 29 4

26th

– Republic day

3. Feb 31

1

EW

D

2 3 4

5

PT

M 5

1st – Wed TT

Course withdrawal

4. Feb 7

8

EW

D

9 10 11 12 5 12th, 13

th –Aatma Trisha

5. Feb 14

15

EW

D

16

H 17

18

CC

M

19 4 16

th – Id-Milad

19th

– Science Fest

6. Feb 21

22

EW

D

23 24 25 26 5

7. Feb/M

ar

28

T1

1

T1

2

H

3

T1

4

T1

5

T1 5

T1 – Test1

2nd

- Mahashivaratri

8. Mar 7

BBV

8

EW

D

9

BB

V

10

BB

V

11

ASD 12 5

9. Mar 14

15

EW

D

16 17

18

CC

M

19 5

10. Mar 21

22

EW

D

23 24 25

26

PT

M

5

11. Mar/A

pr 28

29

EW

D

30 31

1

CC

M

2 5



12. Apr 4

H

5

EWD

6

FA

M

7

LT

8

LT 9 5

4th

Chandramana Ugadi

LT - Lab Test (during

respective lab sessions)

13. Apr 11

LT

12

LT

13

LT

14

H

15

CH

16

H 3

14th

Dr. Ambedkar Jayanthi

15t Compensatory Holiday

16th

Mahaveer Jayanti

LT- Lab Test (during respective

lab sessions)

14. Apr 18

T2

19

T2

20

T2

21

T2

22

H

23

T

2

5 T2 – Test 2 and Quiz

22nd

– Good Friday

15. Apr 25 26 27

BBV

28

BBV

29

LWD 30 5 LWD- Last Working Day

16. May 2 3

4

FAS

D

5

IOH

6

H

7

I

O

H

Study Holidays

IOH – Issue of Hall Tickets

6th

– Basava Jayanthi

17. May 9 10 11 12 13 14 Theory Exams

18. May 16 17 18 19 20 21

19. May 23 24 25 26 27 28 Practical Exams/Seminar for

special topics

20. May/Ju

ne 30 31 1 2 3 4

30th

May to 11th

June-vacation

8th

- Announcement of Results

9th

– 11th

Registration for

summer term

13th

- Commencement of

Summer term

13th

June to 12th

Aug –

Mandatory training for non

summer term students

21. June 6 7

8

AO

R

9 10 11

22. June 13 14 15 16 17 18

23. June 20 21 22 23 24 25

24. June/Ju

ly 27 28 29 30 1 2

25. July 4 5 6 7 8 9

26. July 11 12 13 14 15 16

27. July 18 19 20 21 22 23

28. July 25 26 27 28 29 30

29. Aug 1 2 3 4 5 6

30. Aug 8 9 10 11 12 13 Exams and Evaluation

H : Holiday BBV: Blue Book Verification (3.45 to 4.45PM)

EWD: Extended working day FAM: Faculty Advisors’ meeting

PTM: Parents teachers meet at 10.30AM ASD: Attendance and sessional marks display

FASD: Final Attendance and sessional marks display