pete klupar peter.d.klupar@nasa
DESCRIPTION
Advantages of Very Small Spacecraft 15 May, 2007. Pete Klupar [email protected]. Definitions. Development Mass Cost Time Large2000kg+ 1,000M+ 10yrs+. Small 750kg 100M 2-3yrs Mini 250kg 75M 2yrs - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Definitions
Development
Mass Cost Time
Large 2000kg+ 1,000M+ 10yrs+
Small 750kg 100M 2-3yrs
Mini 250kg 75M 2yrs
Micro 100kg 50M 1.5yrs
Nano 1-10kg 5M ~1 yr
Pico 100gm > 500k months
First Proposed By Surrey Satellite Technology Limited
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
ARC Small Spacecraft Division
• Develop Sustainable Cost Effective Space Missions To Enable Access To Space
• Common, Reusable Architectures– Emphasis On Payloads And Science
• Provide Space Access that is Reliable, Frequent and Low Cost– Small Space Systems
– Secondary Payloads
• Reduce Overall Mission Costs– Goal: Maintain Or Increase Scientific And Exploration Return
While Reducing Life Cycle Costs
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Small Spacecraft Projects
• GeneSat and GeneBox (Flown)
• Lunar Science Orbiter (LSO -Proposed)
• Common Bus (Lunar Lander Concept Shown)
• Lunar Crater Observation Sensing Satellite (LCROSS - in development)
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Background – International Activities
Country/Entity Small Satellite Programs
United Kingdom SSTL ~ 40 missions <$100M, 5-500Kg; DERA/QINETIQ (STRV)
ESA Smart-1, PROBA-1, PROBA-2……PROBA-N
France CNES - Myriade <150kg S/C, <70kg P/L, 6 launched since 2004, 10 in development
Japan JAXSA – Index (72 Kg, 2005 launch <$10M)
Sweden Swedish Space Corp – 6 Small/Microsats in orbit, 3+ in development (Viking, Freja, Astrid 1,2 Odin, Prisma, Svea etc)
Germany DLR, TuB (TUBSAT-A, -B, -N/N1,-DLR, -MAROC,- LAPAN)
Denmark DTU, Terma – Oerstad, Romer
Israel Rafael, IAI – EROS-A, EROS-B (Imaging Microsatellites)
Canada Dynacon/UTIAS – MOST, NESS, Brite, MDA – Rapid Eye
India ISRO – HAMSat (45 kg microsatellite)
Others China, South Africa, Turkey, Chile, Nigeria, Korea, Taiwan, Australia, Eqypt, Indonesia, Russia, Malaysia, Belgium
International Efforts Include >1000 Small Satellites
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Emerging Small ELVs Offer Cost Effective Performance
Unique opportunity
for increased mass at
substantially lower cost
Launch Vehicle
200 km, 38 °
LEO Mass (kg)
Estimated
GTO Mass (kg)
EstimatedTLI Mass (kg)
Estimated
NEO Mass (kg)
EstimatedFairing Diameter
(m)Price ROM ($M)
Pegasus 425 N/A N/A N/A 1.3 $35
Taurus 3110/3113 1530 627 427 ? 1.6 $50
Taurus 3210 1291 107 367 N/A 2.3 $50
Minotaur 1 565 N/A N/A N/A 1.3 $25
Minotaur 4/5 1700 692 464 425 2.3 $25 - $31
Falcon 1 570 107 82 N/A 1.5 $10 - $12
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Minotaur V - Star 37GV
Composite Clamshell Fairing• Flight Proven 92” Taurus Design
Stage 5 Assembly• Star 37GV Solid Rocket Motor (New for M-V)
– Thrust Vector Controlled• OSP-Standard Avionics
– Only Subset Required to Fly Stage 5• Cold Gas Attitude Control System (ACS)• Composite Structure
Guidance Control Assembly (GCA)/Stage 4• GCA Design Shared with Minotaur III & IV • OSP-Standard Flight Proven Avionics
– Split Between S4 and S5• Cold Gas ACS• Stage 4 Star 48V SRM (New for M-V)
– Thrust Vector Control– Qualified via Static Fire
GFE Peacekeeper Stages• Stage 3 - SR120• Stage 2 - SR119• Stage 1 -SR118
• Performance:– 496 Kg to TLI
• Total Launch Cost (ROM):– ~$36M (First Mission)
• Includes S-37GV Qual– ~$26M (Recurring)
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Significant Excess Performance
• Launch Vehicles Provide Hundreds Of Kilograms Of Excess Performance Yearly
• Effective Space Exploration Requires Continued Development And Demonstration
• This Requires Routine, Low Cost Access To Space
• Opportunities For 6 To 12 Secondary Payloads Per Year
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Notional Costs and Schedule
Payload Delivery or Availability Schedule (months)
126 18
$10M
$5M
Budgetary Cost ($)
EPAM(as is)
SWEPAM with upgraded sensor
Optimized Design Based on existing Instrument
MSTI-3 SPARE
MISTEC with 16cm Telescope & New FPA
MSO SPARE with New 30cm Telescope
NFIRE
MITEC
SPARE with New 7.5cm Telescope
SIS/SWIMS SPARE
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Recurring Cost ROM
• Overall Recurring Goal For 5th Unit Is $2.0 M• Major Recurring Cost Drivers
– Communication Equipment $800K To$1m– Radiation Hard Computer: $400K– Star Tracker Equipment: $200K– Propulsion System: $150K– Assembly And Testing: $150K– Telescope System $100K
• COTS Components Vs Space Qualified Components
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Small Concept
PatchAntennas
Star Tracker Diplexer
RadarAltimeter
Avionics
Transmitter
AmplifierReceiver
Battery
DSMACPayload(s) located internally
Additional payload spaceas available
North side panel for externally mounted payloads
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Lander Payload Element ObjectiveMass (kg)
Power (W)
Duty Cycle
Stereo imaging system Surface images for analysis 0.8 6.0 360° images
Mast for stereo imager Provide elevation for imaging 3.5 9.5 1 deployment
Drill, deployment mech samples from depths of 2 m 20.0 30.0 2-4 hrs at station
Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer
Determine volatile compounds and isotopic composition 19.0 75.02-hour analysis measurement
Sample processing system for GCMS
Process core or scoop material for analysis.For each GCMS sample
Beacon Navigation reference 1.0 5.0
Magnets Magnetic susceptibility of regolith particles 0.5 0.0 N/A Static experiment
Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy
Determine the reactivity of the dust for biologic implications5.0 5.0
A few independent measurements
Sample processing for EPRSSeparate regolith particles into >100 nm and <100 nm size fractions for EPR experiment
As required for EPRS measurment
Langmuir probe Levitated dust 3.0 5.0 Continuous
Particle counter Levitated dust 7.0 7.5 Continuous
Arm Deploy inst, conduct experiments, collect samples 13.0 43.0 As required for sampling.
Scoop Recover surface regolith samples 0.5 0.0 As required for sampling.
Geotechnical Expts End effector for geotech properties 3.0 0.0
Imaging lidar Topography of landing region and upper crater interior 13.0 30.0 Scan of crater interior
UV imaging View the interior of the crater with Lyman a illumination 5.0 5.0 Periodic obs crater interior
Emission spectroscopy Chemical comp from micrometeorite impact flashes 3.0 7.0 Cont Obs of crater interior
IR Bolometer Determine surface and near surface temperatures 2.0 5.0 Periodic obs of crater interior
Small Lander Payloads
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Telescope/Reflector
•Communication Hybrid Optical RF Dish (CHORD)
•40 Cm Dia Primary Mirror, 60 Cm RF Reflector (12cm Flexible Extensions)
•Weight: .6kg For Substrate + .4kg Boom + .1kg Horn
•TRL 6 Globalhawk Mirror
Schafer SLMS (Silicon Lightweight Mirror)
Dichroic reflector
Antenna Feed
CMOS imager assembly
Optical: Cassegrain Focus
RF: Prime Focus
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Cis Lunar Payload
Dust Analyzer – Q, v, m of dust grains
ESA, FGM, EFILunar surface potential
LSAS – Composition of dust, exosphere, &
surface
UV/Vis sensor – detect dust remotely
DREX – Measures dust chemical
reactivity
Instrument kg WEFI 3.86 0.36ESA 2.24 1.77FGM 1.46 0.01LSAS 3.5 5IDPU 4.5 7Imager 2 0.5Dust analyzer 1 3.5Reactivity analyzer 2 1Line scanner 1 0.5
TOTAL 21.56 19.64
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Development Projects
30 Hz Miniaturized Polarimeter Minaturized Camera
UNCLASSIFIED//ITAR Restricted
UNCLASSIFIED//ITAR Restricted
Dual Transmitters Onboard Computer
Power Supply
Camera and Gimbal
Includes structure, window, etc.
<15 lbsTotal (as built)
5 lb~5”x5”x12”Communications
Distribution and conditioning
2 lb1”x4”x6”Power Supply
Weight with GPS and electronics
2 lb5” x 4.4” x 7”Gimbal
Includes lens½ lb1.75”x2”x5”VNIR/PI Camera
CommentsWeightDimensionsComponent
Includes structure, window, etc.
<15 lbsTotal (as built)
5 lb~5”x5”x12”Communications
Distribution and conditioning
2 lb1”x4”x6”Power Supply
Weight with GPS and electronics
2 lb5” x 4.4” x 7”Gimbal
Includes lens½ lb1.75”x2”x5”VNIR/PI Camera
CommentsWeightDimensionsComponent
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Micro Lunar Lander Payload Capabilities
• Notional Capability for 130 kg Lander • Payload Mass - 50 Kg max
• dependent on location payload on lander• Payload mass would need to be split between north and
south side of vehicle • Exact split to be dependent on C.G location of each payload
• Payload Power• 15 Watts continuous, 30 Watts w/50% duty cycle• Short duration peak power < 2 minutes: 50 Watts
• Payload Volume• Internally mounted payloads: 7” W x 8”H x 5” D• Externally mounted payloads: 14”W x 10”H x 6” D
• Unique payload envelopes such as drills, scoops and robotic arms would need to be evaluated on a case by case basis
• Locations for payload mounting• Extension module sidewall panels
• Interior and exterior of north facing radiator panel• Interior on south facing solar panel
• Upper radiator panel• Interior as available (shared with avionics)• Exterior (limited by radiator for thermal management)
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Solar Wind Sentinel Instruments
• Measurement objectives– Determination of solar wind composition
• Elemental (hydrogen to zinc, Z=1-30), isotopic, and ionic charge state• Energies range from 100 eV to 500 eV
• ACE instruments– Principally late-70’s heritage– SIS/SWIMS – solar wind isotope mass spectrometer solar measures high-energy particle flux
• Two telescopes followed by stacks of charged particle position-sensitive solid state detectors (aperture ~40 cm2)
– EPAM – electron, proton, alpha particles monitor• Multiple solid-state charged particle detector w/incidence telescope (scanning over sky, apertures ~1
cm2)
– SWEPAM – solar wind ions• Multiple channels w/collimator, electrostatic analyzer, electron multipliers
– MAG – vector magnetometer– ULEIS – ultra-low energy isotope spectrometer– SEPICA – solar energetic particles ionic charge analyzer– CRIS – cosmic-ray isotope spectrometer
• State of the art instrument suite would be less than 6 kg / 15 W– Based on examples like Swedish Munin spacecraft
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
PICO: Primordial Infrared Cosmic Observer
• Scientific Goal: Detect distant galaxies during the epoch of reionization of the universe at 3.3 and 5 um wavelength. This is near the minimum in the zodiacal background. Goal is to detect objects to the confusion limit and map a small area if there is remaining mission time to do so. Results will be significant for understanding initial galaxy formation in the Universe and the nature of first light objects.
• Relation to other Missions: Goal is to go significantly deeper and / or cover greater area than Spitzer IRAC. 1 yr of PICO should be more sensitive than 1 month of Spitzer. Much more sensitive than WISE or ASTRO-F since those are survey missions. Might be able to recover some WISE science if WISE is cancelled. This will be JWST precursor science. Each exposure will have 64x the area of Spitzer IRAC and will have the same size pixels on the sky (~ 1.2”).
• Mission Concept:
• The mission requires that its instrument be pointed at / near the galactic / ecliptic pole
• for about 1 yr duration. The instrument needs to be in a stable thermal environment with few external heat loads. Geosync may be a possible orbit, a solar drift-away orbit would definitely work, and it may be possible to site the instrument near 1 of the lunar poles (if the detector can get cold enough there). If sited on the moon, then the instrument could also function as a site survey telescope (measure emissivity over time).
• The instrument is a very simple 30cm Al telescope with a single off-the-shelf 2k x 2k pixel HAWAII 2RG HgCdTe IR detector array (substrate thinned) with 1 – 5 micron response. 3.3 um (and possibly 5 um) filters are located just above the detectors. The telescope is passively cooled to below 70K and the detector is cooled (via a radiator) to below 40K. There is only 1 operating mode. Communication bandwidth depends on on-board storage and downlink strategy, but is estimated to be on the order of 1 Mbit / sec .
• The spacecraft does need to be 3-axis stabilized if deployed in Geo, solar, or another orbit. RMS pointing uncertainty needs to be on the order of 1 arcsecond. A lunar lander is required if the instrument is to be sited on the moon.
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Space Weather In-situ Hardware(SWISH) Optimization for the VSE
Mission & Objectives
Small Satellite TestBed Implementation
Payload Description
Cost & Scope
• NASA needs to place a coherent suite of sensors aboard every lunar vehicle to measure in-situ and to provide for a standardized measurement of key parameters of the space radiation environment spectrum. • This standardized sensor suite complement will evolve and establish itself as the "gold standard" by which the same sensors' performance can be measured repeatedly on every trans-lunar voyage, in lunar orbit, and eventually on transits to Mars. • This sensor suite will provide for an instrument validation testbed for sensors needed by ESMD to support mission objectives such as astronaut EVA and dosimetry within the manned CEV and lunar habitat environments.• Small satellites offer a unique opportunity to mature existing technologies and evolve new technologies in support of radiation measurements in space.
• This sensor complement would cover an optimized range of particle energy, flux, and energy transfer characteristics of interest to NASA's Vision for Space Exploration. • It will build upon existing mature radiation sensor instruments flown aboard work-horse SEC missions such as ACE and SOHO (e.g., each instrument is relatively low mass (~5-30kg), requires modest power (few-several 10s of Watts) and telemetry (10s – 1000s bits/s)).• Lunar Prospector (LP) had three in-situ radiation measurement instruments smaller in mass, power, and telemetry than the larger SEC missions.• The proposed sensor complement can leverage off the recently launched ST-5 idea of using small satellites with radiation sensor payload instrumentation.
• Small sats (100-1000kg) are excellent testbeds since sensors with their supporting instrumentation can be placed in a variety of radiation environments (e.g., LEO, highly inclined orbits through the electron/trapped proton belts, trans-lunar/Martian, lunar orbit, earth-moon and sun-earth-moon Lagrange points). Example: ST-5 launched March 2006 to inner magnetosphere.• Small sats allow for several quick iterations to achieve standardization of a sensor and its supporting architecture.• Small sats allow for in-situ testing of the sensors in their space environment for long periods of time (as would be required for lunar and Martian missions).
• Development effort is needed to optimize existing high-TRL sensors suites flown on ACE, SOHO, and LP and validate new technologies emerging as smaller, less power, and lower bandwidth radiation sensors are being developed.
• The total LP instrument complement (5 instruments) cost <$3M (FY94). 3/5 instruments were radiation sensors (e.g., alpha particle, neutron & X-ray/gamma-ray spectrometers) developed by LANL.
• The success of ST-5 implies technology exists for reduced mass & power radiation sensors to be tested, validated and standardized for future use on missions to the Moon and Mars.
POC: Kimberly [email protected]: 650-604-6067
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Micromagnitude Variability of Nearby Main Sequence Stars
Mission & Objectives
Benefits and Rationale
Instrument
Deliverable & OutcomesThe theory of stellar evolution predicts the observable path that will be traced by any given star based on its initial mass and metallicity. To date, stars at the initial stages of becoming giants have not been distinguished from younger ZAMS neighbors. Asteroseismology has been successful in interpreting millimagnitude amplitude variability.
An observatory capable of micromagnitude (ppm) stability and accuracy is not presently available for the brightest nearby stars. The defunct GP-B fine guidance telescope has demonstrated the required precision at the 10 micromagnitude level.
The ages of the nearby ZAMS stars have not been determined with precision. Based on the amplitude of their radial g-mode oscillations in brightness, asteroseismology offers an interpretive tool for determining the ages of those stars that are evolving off the main sequence.
The mission is a small telescope in space is able to make precise observations at the micromagnitude level of precision, a level not available from ground based observatories that are limited at the milimagnitude level.
The telescope is based on the heritage of the flight proven GP-B fine guidance telescope, thermally stabilized ultrahigh sensitivity photodetectors, and readout electronics.
1) 15 cm aperture class telescope having a 2 arcmin field of view with beam splitters and bandpass filters. 2) Spin stabilized spacecraft & pointing system with 10 arcsec pointing capability using microthrusters. 3) The spacecraft bus will be an available design.
Low cost satellite with spin stabilized pointing system and a telescope with cryogenic cooler and photometric detectors for the ultraviolet, visible and infrared.
Determination of the precise ages of stars on the Zero Age Main Sequence (ZAMS).
Determination of the variability of bright nearby stars previously not known to be variable at all.
POC: John [email protected] x 43188
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Deuterium Abundance in the Galaxy
Mission & Objectives
Benefits and Rationale
Instrument
Deliverable & OutcomesTraditional methods using UV lines in absorption to nearby stars to determine the deuterium abundance show large variations that can be explained by deuterium depletion onto dust and molecules. The limited range of the UV observations cannot address deuterium destruction via stars. Infrared spectroscopy is well suited for studying the deuterium abundance in molecules throughout our galaxy since molecules have their fundamental frequencies in the infrared, and infrared wavelengths penetrate the dusty disk of the galaxy.
Deuterium was formed in the Big Bang, and its abundance is very sensitive to the conditions at the time it was formed. Deuterium is easily destroyed in stars, but there are no known methods for producing it. Thus, its abundance provides strong constraints on the physical conditions in the very early universe, and on the subsequent star formation history of the universe.
Our objective is to measure the deuterium abundance in PAHs and HDO, two sinks of deuterium, as a function of star formation activity to determine the destruction rate of deuterium by stars and the primordial deuterium abundance.
The instrument is a very simple 50cm Al telescope with a medium spectral resolution (≈1500) echelle spectrometer using a single off-the-shelf 2k x 2k pixel HAWAII 2RG HgCdTe IR detector array with 1 – 5 micron response. The telescope is passively cooled to below 70K and the detector is cooled (via a radiator) to below 40K.
The instrument needs to be in a stable thermal environment with few external heat loads; possibly Geosync, a solar drift-away orbit would definitely work, and it may be possible to site the instrument near one of the lunar poles (if the detector can get cold enough there).
Low cost satellite observing system to study the deuterium abundance as a function of star formation activity.
Determination of the destruction rate of deuterium.
Determination of the primordial deuterium abundance and hence the density of baryons in the universe.
POC: Jesse [email protected] x46136
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
XNAV Path ForwardXNAV Path Forward
GPS Antenna2PL
Atomic Clock
IMU
NFOV Sensor & Electronics
Gimbal Assembly
PayloadSupport
Processor
GPSReceiver
150 Kg200W
• NASA DARPA PartnershipNASA DARPA Partnership• Shuttle Launch 2010Shuttle Launch 2010• ISS Mission Manifested ULF3ISS Mission Manifested ULF3• Projects ObjectivesProjects Objectives
•Venture Class ApproachVenture Class Approach•Navigation, 130 M SEP Anywhere Navigation, 130 M SEP Anywhere in Solar Systemin Solar System•X-Ray Astronomy Afforded by X-Ray Astronomy Afforded by Improved Resolution (3 orders of Mag) Improved Resolution (3 orders of Mag)
Timing References (6 orders of Mag) Timing References (6 orders of Mag)
PHASE I
Concept FeasibilityCharacterize Pulsars
Attitude/position Algorithm
Prototype Detector Design
Prototype Sensor Design
CONOPS Development
PHASE II
GSE DevelopmentCompetition / Source Selection
Design Development
Fabrication / Assembly
Space Qualification
GSE Hardware Development
PHASE III
BAA PADSigned
CoDR PDR CDR
P-IIGo/No-Go
(Re-compete)CDR
Data Collection& Analysis
P-IIIGo/No-Go
CoDR
PDR
Phase I Phase II Phase III
LaunchULF3
2011
70 FTEs$8 M
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
XNAV PayloadFunctional Architecture
ARC
GSFC
ARC
ARC
ARC
GSFC
GSFC
ARC
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
On-Orbit Anomalies - 2003
*Extracted from Orbital Anomalies in Goddard Spacecraft for Fiscal Year 2003
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
NanoSat for Solar Wind Monitoring
• ACE background– ACE (Advanced Composition Explorer, launch in 1997) proved to be valuable asset for
near-real-time monitoring of solar wind – Developed unintended addition to its basic research role by providing significant
operational value of ~one hour advanced warning of geomagnetic storms– Large spacecraft (~785 kg at Delta-2 launch, early PI-led mission)– Desire for long-term replacement solution
• ACE exceeding significantly beyond its design lifetime
– Recurring launches with possible redundant system– Many studies and proposals over past ten years
• Either too expensive or not from credible players
• Solar Wind Sentinel mission– Earth-Sun L-1 libration point (unstable)
• ~1.5 million km from Earth, approximately 200,000x50,000 halo orbit
– Propulsion requirements • LEO injection (requires solid kick stage for Falcon-1 launch, slightly more dv than lunar mission,
+35 m/sec)• L-1 halo orbit capture (<50 m/sec)• Moderate halo orbit maintenance (~10 m/sec/year)• Reaction control (minimal if solar radiation pressure can be managed)
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Small Sat Investments $M
Existing In Orbit Planned Total
DARPA+NRO 1000 450 750 2200
ORS 135 427 562
AF AIRSS 1917 1917
SSTL 171 150 321
RAPIDEYE 140 140
ESA 60 280 340
CNES 50 230 912 1192
MDA 5000 250 5250
TOTAL 6050 1046 4826 11922
30+smallsats
DARPA/NRO: F6, M idstep, Spawn, Roast, M itex, Streak, Isat, Dsx, Glomr, Tercel/Secs, Macsat1,2, M icrosat1-7, Darpasat, other
ORS: XSS-11, Tacsat 1,2,3, ORS PMD
SSTL: Uosat 1-5,S80/T,Kitsat,Posat,Healthsat,Fasat AB,Clementine,Ceris,Thai-Paht,Tiunsat,Snap,Tsinghua,Picosat,Alsat,Bilsat,Nigeria,UK-dmc,Topsat,Beijing
ESA: PROBA1,2,3,4
CNES: Demeter, Parasol, Essaim(4), Spirale(2), M icroscope, Picard, HRG (4), HRG+, GMES, Pegase, Taranis, SMES, Altika, ALsat2
MDA: LOSAT, STRV, MSTI, Clementine, LEAP, EKV, THAAD, ASAT, SBI, BP, Intellect, KKVWS, Have Sting, Gremlin, NFIRE
Small Sat Investments in Billions: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Small Sat Cost, Weight, Performance
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
NASA SMEX Heritage
36 months, $53M development· S/C 258 lbs, 60 watts· P/L 88 lbs, 22 watts
· Zenith oriented sun pointer
SAMPEX – 7/92Study solar, anomalous, galactic, and
magnetospheric energetic particles
42 months, $45M development· S/C 284 lbs, 33 watts· P/L 112 lbs, 15 watts
· Spin stabilized, magnetically processed
FAST – 8/96
Plasma physics investigation of high altitude aurora
60 months, $64M development· S/C 410 lbs, 133 watts· P/L 225 lbs, 59 watts
· 3-axis stabilized, fine stellar pointer
SWAS – 12/98
Investigation into the composition of dense interstellar clouds
36 months, $40M development· S/C 348 lbs, 114 watts
· P/L 97 lbs, 30 watts· 3 –axis stabilized, fine sun pointer
TRACE – 4/98
Explore and define the dynamics and structure of the solar heliosphere
46 months, $46M development· S/C 403 lbs, 125 watts· P/L 154 lbs, 34 watts
· 3 –axis stabilized, fine sun pointer
WIRE – 3/99
Survey starburst galaxies in the far-infrared to determine their evolutionary rates
31
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Lunar Express Orbiter
BatteryTransmitter
Receiver
Amplifier
Reaction Wheel
Patch Antennas Star Tracker
Lasercom
IPP Router
& Local RF Comm
Leverage Flight Heritage
FOUO No Secondary Distribution Without Permission
Common Bus Block Diagram