peter h. sikkema university of guelph

76
Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph Weed Management in Corn Questions from Farmers

Upload: george

Post on 24-Feb-2016

42 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Weed Management in Corn Questions from Farmers. Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph. Question # 1. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Peter H. SikkemaUniversity of Guelph

Weed Management in CornQuestions from Farmers

Page 2: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

I was planning to plant soybeans next spring so I applied

Guardian for perennial broadleaf weed control last fall. I changed

my mind and I would like to plant corn this spring. Will the

corn be OK?

Question # 1

Page 3: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

7 DAE 14 DAE 28 DAE 56 DAE0

4

8

12

16

20

Control 14 g/ac 28 g/ac

Corn Injury the Following Spring

Vis

ible

Cor

n In

jury

(%)

Fall Application of Guardian

Sikkema, UG

Page 4: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Fall Application of Guardian

Corn Injury the Following Spring

Page 5: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Yield (bu/ac)0

40

80

120

160

200181 175 172

Control 14 g/ac 28 g/ac

Corn Yield the following Fall

Cor

n Yi

eld

(bu/

ac)

Fall Application of Guardian

Sikkema, UG

Page 6: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. The fall application of Guardian results in visible injury in corn the following spring

a. Purple discolourationb. Stunting

2. In our studies there was a trend (9 bu/ac) to reduced yield, but it was not statistically significant

Conclusions

Fall Application of Guardian

Page 7: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Is weed control reduced if the herbicide is in spray solution

in the sprayer for an extended period of time?

Question # 2

Page 8: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Length of Time Herbicide is in Spray Solution

1. Sometimes a herbicide already is in spray solution but it cannot be spray immediately due to:a. Mechanical breakdownb. Sudden and unexpected rainc. High winds

Introduction

Page 9: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution

1. Herbicides were mixed and held in solution for:a. 7 daysb. 3 daysc. 1 dayd. 0 days

Experiments

Page 10: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution

Herbicides Tested

PreemergenceHerbicides

BattalionConverge

Frontier + MarksmanPrimextra + Callisto

Page 11: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (PRE)

Velvetleaf

Pigweed

Lamb's-quarters

0 20 40 60 80 100

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Visual Weed Control (% 8 WAA)

Converge

Sikkema, UG

Page 12: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Converge – Sprayed Immediately

Page 13: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (PRE)

Converge

100 125 150 175 200 225

215

212

206

186

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Yield (bu/ac)

Sikkema, UG

Page 14: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (PRE)

Velvetleaf

Pigweed

Lamb's-quarters

0 20 40 60 80 100

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Visual Weed Control (% 8 WAA)

Primextra + Callisto

Sikkema, UG

Page 15: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Primextra + Callisto – Sprayed Immediately

Page 16: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (PRE)

1. When herbicides were held in spray solution for an extended period of time there was:

a. No difference in pigweed controlb. A decrease in lamb’s-quarters control with

Convergec. A decrease in velvetleaf control with Converge

and Frontier + Marksman

Summary

Page 17: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (PRE)

1. When herbicides were held in spray solution for an extended period of time there was (continued):

d. No decrease in corn yield with Frontier + Marksman, Primextra + Callisto and Battalion

e. A decrease in corn yield with Converge

Summary

Page 18: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution

Herbicides Tested

PostemergenceHerbicides

Callisto + AtrazineDistinctLiberty

Roundup

Page 19: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (POST)

Velvetleaf

Pigweed

Ragweed

Lamb's-quarters

0 20 40 60 80 100

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Visual Weed Control (% 8 WAA)

Distinct

Sikkema, UG

Page 20: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (POST)

Velvetleaf

Pigweed

Ragweed

Lamb's-quarters

0 20 40 60 80 100

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Visual Weed Control (% 8 WAA)

Roundup

Sikkema, UG

Page 21: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Liberty – Sprayed Immediately

Page 22: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (POST)

Distinct

Callisto + atrazine

Roundup

Liberty

100 125 150 175 200 225

7 days 3 days 1 day 0 days

Yield (bu/ac)

Sikkema, UG

Page 23: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Time in Solution (POST)

1. When herbicides were held in spray solution for an extended period of time there was:

a. No decrease in weed control with Distinct, Callisto + atrazine, Roundup or Liberty

b. No decrease in corn yield 2. It is recommended to spray the herbicide

held in solutiona. Monitor field closely and re-spray if necessary

Summary

Page 24: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Is there a benefit of adding Crop Booster to

glyphosate in RR corn?

Question # 3

Page 25: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

No effect on weed control

Lamb's-quarters

Lady's thumb

Nightshade

Pigweed

Ragweed

Velvetleaf

Foxtail

0 20 40 60 80 100

Glyphosate + Crop Booster Glyphosate

Visual Weed Control (% 8 WAA)

Crop Booster – 6 studies

Sikkema, UG

Page 26: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Crop Booster on RR Corn

Roundup

Page 27: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

No effect on RR corn yield

Check

Glyphosate

Glyphosate + Crop Booster

0 40 80 120 160

72

140

143

Corn Yield (bu/ac)

Crop Booster – 6 studies

Sikkema, UG

Page 28: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Crop Booster

1. No difference in weed control2. No difference in RR corn yield

Summary

Page 29: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

My corn is at the 8-10 leaf stage and I have weed escapes.

Which herbicides are safest to apply at this late stage?

Question # 4

Page 30: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Late Herbicide Application in Corn

Accent

Option

Distinct

Callisto + atrazine

Pardner + atrazine

PeakPlus

Shotgun

0 3 6 9 12 15

Spray Overlap Recommended Rate

Visible Crop Injury (% 2 WAA)

Corn Injury – 7 studies

Sikkema, UG

Page 31: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Late Herbicide Application in Corn

Distinct Injury in Corn

Page 32: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Late Herbicide Application in Corn

Accent

Option

Distinct

Callisto + atrazine

Pardner + atrazine

PeakPlus

Shotgun

0 3 6 9 12 15

Spray Overlap Recommended Rate

Decrease in corn height (% 4 WAA)

Decrease in Corn Height – 7 studies

Sikkema, UG

Page 33: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Late Herbicide Application in Corn

Accent

Option

Distinct

Callisto + atrazine

Pardner + atrazine

PeakPlus

Shotgun

0 40 80 120 160 200

Spray Overlap Recommended Rate

Corn Yield (bu/ac)

Corn Yield – 7 studies

Sikkema, UG

Page 34: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Late Herbicide Application in Corn

1. Option results in greater injury than Accent2. Distinct and Shotgun result in greater injury

than Callisto + atrazine, Pardner and PeakPlus

3. There was no effect on corn yield in these studies

Summary

Page 35: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

I heard about glyphosate-resistant weeds.

What are my weed management options in RR

corn?

Question # 5

Page 36: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. There are many approaches to weed management in Roundup Ready corn

a. Yield was maximized when Roundup was applied before weeds were 10 cm in height 1

b. Profitability was maximized with one early postemergence application of Roundup 2

2. BUT, the over-reliance on Roundup has resulted in the selection of glyphosate resistant weed biotypes or weeds naturally tolerant to glyphosate in other jurisdictions

Roundup Ready Corn

Introduction

1 Nelson, 20072 Thomas et al. 2007

Page 37: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. One application of Roundup applied early postemergence (EP)

2. One application of Roundup applied late postemergence (LP)

3. A tankmix of Roundup plus a residual herbicide (Marksman) applied EP

4. A sequential application of a preemergence (PRE) residual herbicide (Converge) followed by Roundup applied LP

5. A sequential application of Roundup applied EP and LP

Roundup Ready Corn

Weed Management Strategies

Page 38: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

0

20

40

60

80

100

38

98

70

99 9893

99 99 100 99

Env # 1 Env # 2

Velvetleaf Control – 8 WAA

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UGNurse, AAFC

Page 39: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Roundup + Marksman EP

Sikkema, UG

Page 40: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

0

20

40

60

80

100 93100 100 100 100

Pooled across environments

Pigweed Control – 8 WAA

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UGNurse, AAFC

Page 41: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

0

20

40

60

80

100

7178

100 100 9991 91

100 100 100

Ridgetown A-2006 Exeter-2007

Lamb’s-quarters Control – 8 WAA

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UGNurse, AAFC

Page 42: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UG

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Page 43: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

0

20

40

60

80

100

45

100

71

97 10097 99 98 99 99

Harrow - 2007 Ridgetown A-2007

Green Foxtail Control – 8 WAA

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UGNurse, AAFC

Page 44: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Weed-free Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE;

Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

0

40

80

120

160

200200 191

180194 196 199

Average of 11 studies

Yield (bu/ac)

Yiel

d (T

/ha)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UGNurse, AAFC

Page 45: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup LP

Roundup LP

Sikkema, UG

Sikkema, UG

Page 46: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup EP Roundup LP Roundup + Marksman EP

Converge PRE; Roundup LP

Roundup EP; Roundup LP

550

600

650

700

750

698

642

747

718739

689

620

584

618

650

Ridgetown B-2007 Exeter-2007

Profit Margins

Pro

fit M

argi

n ($

/ac)

Roundup Ready Corn

Vyn, UG

Page 47: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. Weed management is field specific2. The most consistent weed control was provided by

the two-pass programsa. Residual herbicide (PRE) fb glyphosate (LP)b. A sequential application of glyphosate applied EP fb LP

Roundup Ready Corn

Conclusions

Page 48: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. Due to the possibility of glyphosate-resistant weeds or weed shifts, the following are recommended:

a. A diverse crop rotationb. Inclusion of multiple herbicide modes-of-

actiona. Preemergence residual followed by

glyphosate postemergenceb. Postemergence tankmix of glyphosate +

another effective herbicide

Roundup Ready Corn

Comments

Page 49: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

When is the best time to apply glyphosate in RR corn?

Question # 6

Page 50: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Application Timing1. There is a temptation to delay the application

until all the weeds have emerged

Page 51: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Spike 1 leaf 2 leaf 3 leaf 4 leaf0

20

40

60

80

100

Velvetleaf Pigweed Foxtail, Green

Application Timing

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

)

Roundup Ready Corn

Sikkema, UG

Page 52: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Weed Free

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8100

110

120

130

140

150143 141 139 138 136

133 131 129 127

Average of 20 experiments

Corn Leaf Stage

Roundup - Application Timing (20 sites)

Yiel

d (b

u/ac

)

Hamill, AAFCSikkema, UG

Page 53: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Roundup - Application Timing

Delay in Application

(Days)Yield Loss

(bu/ac)Value ($/ac)

137

10

0.51.53.55.0

2.006.0014.0020.00

Page 54: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Roundup Ready Corn

Application Timing1. Early application is recommended

a. Improved controlb. Reduced weed interferencec. Increased corn yield

2. Weed management is always field specifica. The appropriate application timing ranged

from the 1 to 8-leaf stage in our experiments

Page 55: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

What is the effect of glyphosate drift on conventional corn?

Question # 7

Page 56: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Glyphosate Drift

Page 57: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Control 1% 5% 10% 20%0

10

20

30

40

50

60

0 19

20

52

Average of 9 experiments (ON, OH, IN, IL)

Glyphosate Concentration (%)

Corn Injury – 14 days after drift occurred

Vis

ible

Cor

n In

jury

(%)

Glyphosate Drift

Brown, UG

Page 58: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Control 1% 5% 10% 20%0

50

100

150

200

157 152 147125

76

Average of 12 experiments (ON, OH, IN, IL)

Glyphosate Concentration (%)

Corn Yield

Cor

n Yi

eld

(bu/

ac)

Glyphosate Drift

Brown, UG

1% 20%9% 52%

Page 59: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Control 1% 5% 10% 20%0

50

100

150

200

157 152 147125

76

Average of 12 experiments (ON, OH, IN, IL)

Glyphosate Concentration (%)

Corn Yield

Cor

n Yi

eld

(bu/

ac)

Glyphosate Drift

Brown, UG

1% 20%9% 52%

3% 6% 20% 52%

Page 60: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. There are large differences in injury and yield loss from one field to another due to:

a. Concentration of the driftb. Size of the corn at the time the drift occurredc. Weather conditions prior to and after the drift eventd. Management after the drift event occurred

2. Corn yield loss ranged from 0 to almost 100% due to glyphosate drift in these studies

Glyphosate Drift

Conclusions

Page 61: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Does the time of day that I spray have an effect on

weed control?

Question # 8

Page 62: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

6 am 9 am 12 pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 pm 12 am0

20

40

60

80

100

61

79

92 9281

3024

Velvetleaf Control

Pardner

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

) 8 W

AA

Time of Day

Page 63: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Weedy 6 am 9 am 12 pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 pm 12 am0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

100

143 144 144 148 142135

125

Corn Yield (2 experiments at Ridgetown)

Pardner

Cor

n Yi

eld

(bu/

ac)

Time of Day

Page 64: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

6 am 9 am 12 pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 pm 12 am0

20

40

60

80

100

18

8897 96 96

7668

Velvetleaf Control

Liberty

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

) 8 W

AA

Time of Day

Page 65: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

3 pm

Weedy Check 6 am 9 am

12 pm

6 pm 9 pm 12 am

Liberty Time of Day

Page 66: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Weedy 6 am 9 am 12 pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 pm 12 am0

40

80

120

160

200

93

138 141154 152 145 137

115

Corn Yield (2 Experiments at Ridgetown)

Liberty

Cor

n Yi

eld

(bu/

ac)

Time of Day

Page 67: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

6 am 9 am 12 pm 3 pm 6 pm 9 pm 12 am0

20

40

60

80

100 98 98 98 98 98 95

82

Velvetleaf Control

Roundup

Wee

d C

ontro

l (%

) 8 W

AA

Time of Day

Page 68: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

3 pm

Weedy Check 6 am 9 am

12 pm

6 pm 9 pm 12 am

RoundupTime of Day

Page 69: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Summary – HerbicidesHerbicide > 10% Difference %

Pardner 7 out of 9 78

Liberty 7 out of 13 54

Atrazine 2 out of 4 50

Accent 2 out of 6 33

Distinct 2 out of 12 17

Roundup 1 out of 7 14

Time of Day

Page 70: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Summary – Weed SpeciesWeed Species > 10% Difference %

Velvetleaf 8 out of 12 67

Lamb’s-quarters 6 out of 14 43

Pigweed 2 out of 5 40

Barnyard grass 2 out of 5 40

Common ragweed 4 out of 11 36

Green foxtail 1 out of 3 33

Time of Day

Page 71: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

1. Change in efficacy during the day is thought to be affected by:

a. Air temperature – 9.5-11.5 OC (Martinson et al. 2002)i. Less viscous epicuticular wax (Price, 1983)ii. Increased membrane permeability (Anderson et al., 1993)iii. Increase in rates of diffusion (Price, 1993)iv. Increased enzyme activity and metabolic processes (Price, 1993)

b. Leaf angle – decrease in spray interception and retention - 85% (Andersen and Koukkari, 1978; Martinson et al, 2002)

Time of Day

Summary

Page 72: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Leaf orientation during the day

Leaf orientation during the night

Page 73: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

2. The effect of time of day on herbicide efficacy is dependent on:

a. Herbicidei. Pardner, Liberty and Aatrex were affected the mostii. Accent, Distinct and Roundup were affected the least

b. Weed speciesi. Velvetleaf was affected the mostii. Green foxtail was affected the least

c. Environmenti. Velvetleaf control with glyphosate varied 1, 1 and 16% in 2005,

2006 and 2007 respectively3. The level of weed control due to time of application

can affect corn yield

Time of Day

Conclusions

Page 74: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Actually, there is a silver lining. The herbicides with greatest potential

for off-site injury (systemic herbicides) are affected the least

by time of day. So apply them when weed speeds are lowest.

That’s confusing, now what do I do?

Page 75: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Contact herbicides which are more sensitive to time of day have less potential for off-site injury. Apply them during the

warmest, brightest sunlit hours of the day.

That’s confusing, now what do I do?

Page 76: Peter H. Sikkema University of Guelph

Peter H. SikkemaUniversity of Guelph

Weed Management in CornQuestions from Farmers