peter kiesheyer
DESCRIPTION
FTTH Conference EUROPE 2012 - WorkshopMunich, GermanyTRANSCRIPT
CableSystems
Be efficient in deploying your passive network infrastructure.
Peter KiesheyerProgram Manager FTTH February 14th , 2012
2Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Agenda
Be efficient in deploying your passive network infrastructure
Factors of influence driving your efficiency in deploying your passive network in the distribution network and MDU
Focusing on:– Cable placement methods from the FCP (Fibre Concentration
Point) to the building– Termination methods and the right fibre type for the MDU
deployment
3Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
EfficiencyEfficiency …. effort to produce a specific outcome effectively with a
minimum amount or quantity of: • unnecessary effort • waste • expense
Source: Wickipedia
There is no “one fits all solution”:The right combination of factors of influence for your environment is key to win
There is no “one fits all solution”:The right combination of factors of influence for your environment is key to win
4Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Deployment FactorsConsider Variables That Impact Deployment Speed and Cost
• Regulation
• Local rules– e.g., aerial or buried deployment
• Structure of deployment area
– e.g., mix of Single-Family Unit and Multi-Dwelling Unit
• Building architecture
• Expected penetration levels
• Network design and deployment technique: simple and flexible– Typically more than 50 percent of costs are installation and labor
• Availability of skilled workforce
• Quality/reliability
5Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Fibre Concentration Point (FCP) to the Building
6Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
TechniquesFTTH Distribution Network: Main Deployment Techniques
Multi-Dwelling Units (MDUs)
Single-Family Units (SFUs)
Aerial solution
Buried solution
FibreConcentration
Point (FCP)
7Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
FCP to the Building: Various Deployment TechniquesNo “One Fits All Solution”Duct/cable placement methods have a substantial impact to total deployments costs in the distribution network
– Choosing an optimal cable routing is crucial to save cost – Important for deployment speed: saves time and increases deployment speed
It is key to mix and match different deployment types to optimize deployment costs and to meet deployment restrictions (geographical conditions, local regulation)
• The common methods and their options:– Aerial installation
• Pole mounted• Façade
– Buried installation• Digging (direct-buried cable or ducts)• Core removal • Installation in gas or water pipes• Installation in rivers and waterways• Installation in sewer pipes• Horizontal drilling technology• Micro-trenching in sidewalks and roads• Blown fiber
8Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
FCP to the Building: Various Deployment TechniquesDuct/cable Placement Costs Vary by Method
Assumes single deployment method for entire cable route (excluding drop)
The costs for each methodology will vary widely for many reasons. Therefore, each method will have a “range.”
Cable placement relative cost
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Micro trenching Core removal Horizontal Drilling Aerial Pole Sewer Pipes Digging
9Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Deferred Capital Costs Minimize First-installed Cost BaseExample:
Minimized capital deployment driven by building connection on demand
Deferral opportunities enabled through preconnectorised solutions
– Drop– Terminal– Splitter …
Quick customer connect on demand
10Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Deployment Efficiency in the MDU
11Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Deployment Efficiency in the MDUMDU Factors of Efficiency
No “one fits all solution”: we learned that each building is different
– MDU network architecture is driven by • Building size (size S to XL, from direct drop to central riser, etc.)• Projected take rate (drives solution choice and termination technique)• Local requirements (indoor/façade)
– Deployment speed• Solution choice (splice, precon, etc.)• Required skill level for installation
– Regulation • Fibre count, # of basement terminals, termination technique
– Network quality & power budget• Factory-built & tested components vs. field installation• Bend-insensitive fibre
12Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Use of Modeling: Find the Most Efficient Combination of Your Factors of Influence
No. of floors
No. of cust./floor
Total HP
Take rate
Local data
Input
Sol.1
Sol.2
Sol.3
Sol.4
Sol.5
Sol.6
Sol.7
Sol.8
Sol.9
Modeling Output
13Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Deployment Speed Fibre Termination Technique & Fibre Choice
Due to a large number of individual fiber connections and the usually large size of FTTH-MDU rollouts, fiber splicing is not an adequate method anymore
Splicing• Long process time• Skilled labor•…
Field-installable connectors• Low skilled labor• Quick installation• …
Low Speed High
Can be treated “like copper”• Quick and easy installation • Enables less skilled labour• Less failure during installation and live time
Shift tobend-insensitive fibre cables
to further speed up
Fiber stubFactory polished
Mechanicalsplice with indexmatching gel
Field fiber
Precon• Modular• Easy, quick & reliable installation• …
14Cable Systems Corning Confidential and Proprietary
Summary
There is no “one fits all solution”:The right combination of factors for your specific environment is key to win:
• Fully understand your specific environment and its needs • Select the right duct/cable placement method• Minimize skilled labor• Deferred capital costs: modularity• Choose the right fibre termination technique & fibre
There is no “one fits all solution”:The right combination of factors for your specific environment is key to win:
• Fully understand your specific environment and its needs • Select the right duct/cable placement method• Minimize skilled labor• Deferred capital costs: modularity• Choose the right fibre termination technique & fibre
CableSystems