petroleum contaminated site at hickam air force base · 2011-08-10 · phytoremediation • the use...
TRANSCRIPT
Petroleum Contaminated Site at Hickam Air Force Base
Agriculture-Based Bioremediation of Petroleum Contaminated Soils
in Pacific Island Ecosystems
Greenhouse and Laboratory Studies Field Demonstration
Plant Study(C.S. Tang and W.H. Sun)
Microorganism Study(Francoise Robert)
Evaluation of Tropical Plants for Phytoremediation of
Petroleum Contaminated Coastal Subsurface Soils
in Hawaii
Presented by:Wenhao Sun
University of Hawaii
Phytoremediation
• The use of plant-based systems to remove, degrade or stabilize organic and inorganic contaminants in environments
– Low cost, aesthetically pleasing cleanup technique – Most useful at sites with shallow, low levels of
contamination– Useful for treating a wide variety of environmental
contaminants
Soil Background Depth(m)0
pH EC Salinity(mmhos/cm)
7.8
8.2
7.8
0.7-5.0 non -mdo.
5.0-30.0 mod.-high
8.2-10.0 mod.
1.3
1.8
Soil Background Depth(m)0
1.3 (51”)
1.8 (70”)
Petroleum USDA Hydrocarbons Classification
Sandy loamNo
No
< 3,500 mg/kg Sandy loam
Silt
Objective
• Evaluate tropical plants for use in phytoremediation of petroleum contaminated coastal deep soils
Tasks and Technical Approach
• Plant selection– Preliminary screening of plants for
tolerance of salt and petroleum hydrocarbons
– Main screening of plants for reduction of petroleum hydrocarbons
• Simulating petroleum-contaminated deep soil using trisector-planters
Key Experimental Components-Preliminary screening
• Objective– Identify the plants with high tolerance to either NaCl or No. 2
diesel fuel
• Materials and Methods– Plant materials: Nine plants grown in DeepotTM
– Treatment: Control: without NaCl and DieselSalt level: 2% NaClDiesel levels: 5,000 mg/kg
10,000 mg/kg
Criteria for Plants Used in Field Demonstration and Evaluation
Experiments–Native or naturalized
–Salt tolerant
–Deep Rooting
–Wide potential and range of use
–Rapid growth
–Low maintenance
Plant Species Used• Trees (5 species)
- Kiawe Prosopis pallida- Milo Thespesia populnea- Kou Cordia subcordata- Common ironwood Casuarina epuisetifolia- Tropic coral tree Erythrina variegata
•Shrubs (3 species)- False sandalwood Myoporum sandwicense- Beach naupaka Scaevola sericea- Nerium oleander Nerium oleander
•Grass (1 species)•Buffelgrass Cenchrus cilliaris
Plants Used in Field Demonstration
Kiawe Milo
Kou Common ironwood
Plants Used in Field Demonstration
Tropical coral tree False sandalwood
Beach naupaka Nerium oleander
Growth Conditions
• Two to five-month old plants transplanted to Deepots (6.35 x 25.4 cm)
• Top soil, coral sand/sandy loam• Greenhouse conditions
– 55% shaking, misting for two weeks– Temperature range: 36/19 C (Day/Night)– Light intensity: Max. 600 µmol m-2 s-1
– Sub-irrigation with Peter’s liquid nutrients containing 0% or 2% NaCl
Key Experimental Components-Preliminary screening
• Evaluation– Plant growth (plant height and biomass)
Milo
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Kou
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Common ironwood
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Nerium oleander
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Tropical coral tree
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Buffelgrass
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Kiawe
Control 2% NaCl 5,000 mg/kg 10,000 mg/kgDiesel Diesel
Key Experimental Components-Preliminary screening
• Results– Tropical coral tree, buffelgrass and kiawe
seedlings were susceptible to either 2% of NaCl or diesel fuel at 10,000 mg/kg soil, but tolerant of diesel at 5,000 mg/kg.
– Milo, Kou, common ironwood, N. oleander, beach naupaka and false sandalwood were tolerant of high salinity (2% NaCl) and high diesel fuel level (10,000 mg/kg).
Key Experimental Components-Main screening
• Objective– select trees and shrubs that have a high potential
to remediate saline soil contaminated with petroleum hydrocarbons using No.2 diesel fuel as a model contaminant.
• Materials and Methods– Plant materials: Seven plants selected from preliminary
experiment.– Treatment: Diesel levels: 0 (mg diesel/kg soil)
5,00010,000
Salt level: 1% NaCl
Key Experimental Components-Main screening
• Evaluation– Photochemical efficiency– Plant biomass– Diesel concentration in soil
Plant Effects on Diesel Depletion In Soil Treated with 5,000 mg diesel /kg soil
No plant
No plant c
ontroOlea
nderNau
paka
NaioIro
nwoodKouMilo
Kiawe
TPH
-D (m
g/kg
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Day 0 14 Weeks
Plant Effects on Diesel Depletion In Soil Treated with 10,000 mg diesel/kg soil
No plant
No plants
Oleander
Naupak
aNaio
Ironwood
Kou
MiloKiaw
e
TPH
-D (m
g/kg
)
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
10000
Day 0 14 Weeks
** *
Key Experimental Components-Main screening
• Results– Milo, kou and kiawe significantly accelerate
degradation of petroleum in the soil containing both 10,000 mg /kg diesel and a moderate salinity (1% NaCl).
Key Experimental Components-Trisector planter experiment
• Objectives– Determine the feasibility of accelerating the degradation of
petroleum contaminants in coastal deep soils using selected plants.
• Materials and Methods– Plant materials: Milo, kou and false sandalwood– Treatment: Plants vs. unplanted Control
Aeration vs. non-aeration– Apparatus: Trisector-Planter – Soil treatment: Spiked with 6 petroleum hydrocarbons in
the bottom section.
The trisector planter with a growing tree and a soil profile similar to that of the field demonstration site.
Aeration device In the bottom section
Trisector Planter Experiment
• The bottom sandy loam was spiked with diesel components of known concentrations
Hydrocarbon Concentration (mg/kg of soil)Hexadecane 500Eicosane 500Docosane 500Pristane 200Phenanthrene 200Pyrene 200
False sandalwood Milo Kou(Left front)
False sandalwood Milo Kou(Left front)
Key Experimental Components-Trisector planter experiment
• Evaluation– Quantitative analysis of the 6 petroleum
hydrocarbons
Statistical significance of changes in the concentration of 6 petroleum hydrocarbons in the bottom section of unplanted trisector-planters between day 0 and day 200 by t-tests.
_________________________________________________________Hydrocarbon t-test significancea
_________________________________________________________Hexadecane NSEicosane NSDocosane NSPristane *Phenanthrene *Pyrene **_________________________________________________________
aNS, not significant; *, significant (P < 0.05); **, significant (P 0.01).
Statistical significance of changes in the concentration of 6 petroleum hydrocarbons in the bottom sections of aeration treatment vs. non-aeration control at day 200 by t-tests.
_________________________________________________________Hydrocarbon t-test significancea
_________________________________________________________Hexadecane NSEicosane NSDocosane *Pristane NSPhenanthrene NSPyrene NS_________________________________________________________
aNS, not significant; *, significant (P < 0.05).
Reduction of PHC (%)Compared to unplanted control
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100He
xade
cane
Eico
sane
Doco
sane
Phen
anth
rene
Pyre
ne
False sandalwoodMiloKou
SummaryEvaluation Process and Results
Buffelgrass
Nerium oleanderNerium oleander
Beach naupakaBeach naupaka
False sandalwoodFalse sandalwoodFalse sandalwood
KouKouKouTropical coral tree
MiloMiloCommon Ironwood
Kou
MiloCommon Ironwood
KiaweMilo
Kiawe
Recommend-ed plants
Trisector-planterMain-screeningPre-screening
Conclusions
• Milo and kou have better potential than false sandalwood in phytoremediation of petroleum in the costal subsurface soils in Hawaii and other Pacific Islands.
Conclusions
• The trisector-planter designed for deep soil phytoremediation study can serve as a useful tool to indirectly but convincingly validate the effectiveness of phytoremediation in the field.
Acknowledgements• Principal Investigators (UH):
Chung-Shih TangFrancoise Robert Chittaranjan Ray
• Research Associate: Marisa Toma
• Graduate Research Assistants: Ryan Kody Jones, J.B. Tay
• Undergraduate Research Assistants:Monroe Bryce, Jim Leary, Matthew Vierra, and Joey Lo
• Sponsor: CH2M HILL Inc.
Mahalo