petropavlovsk plc · mgt 13.5% everest alliance ltd 7.5% fortiana holdings slevin ltd 4.6% 4.6% abu...
TRANSCRIPT
1
PETROPAVLOVSK PLC
Q4 / FY 2019 Operating Results
January 2020
2
Cautionary and forward-looking statements
— Some statements contained in this presentation or in documents referred to in it are or may be forward-looking statements, including
references to guidance. Such statements reflect the Company’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks,
assumptions, uncertainties and other factors beyond the Company’s control that could cause actual results to differ from those
expressed in such statements. Although the Company believes that such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date
of this presentation, are reasonable, no assurance can be given that they will prove to be correct. Therefore, you should not place
undue reliance on these statements
— There can be no assurance that the results and events contemplated by the forward-looking statements contained in this presentation
will, in fact, occur. The Company will not undertake any obligation to release publicly any revisions to these forward-looking
statements to reflect events, circumstances or unanticipated events occurring after the date of this presentation, except as required by
law or by any appropriate regulatory authority. Nothing in this presentation or in documents referred to in it should be considered as a
profit forecast.
— The past performance of the Company and its securities is not, and should not be relied on as, a guide to the future performance of
the Company and its securities
— This presentation does not constitute, or form part of or contain any invitation, recommendation or offer to any person to underwrite,
subscribe for, buy, sell, otherwise acquire, exchange or dispose of any shares or securities in the Company or advise persons to do
so in any jurisdiction, including, but not limited to, the Russian Federation, nor shall it, or any part of it, form the basis of or be relied on
in any connection with or act as an inducement to enter into any contract or commitment therefore or engage in any other investment
activity. In particular, this presentation and the information contained herein are not an offer of securities for sale in the United States.
This presentation does not constitute an advertisement of any securities in the Russian Federation
— No reliance may be placed for any purpose whatsoever on the information or opinions contained in this presentation or on its
completeness and no liability whatsoever is accepted for any loss howsoever arising from any use of this presentation or its contents
or otherwise in connection therewith.
— The development and production plans and estimates set out herein represent the current views of the Company's management. The
Company’s Board reviews the production estimates on an ongoing basis. All planning is subject, inter alia, to available funding and
capital allocation decisions
— English law and English courts will have exclusive jurisdiction over any disputes arising from or connected with this presentation
3
Company Overview
St Petersburg
- RDC Hydrometallurgy
Mining & Processing
Pioneer
Albyn
Malomir
Pokrovskiy
Moscow
- Petropavlovsk Moscow
- PHM Engineering
Blagoveshchensk
- Regis Exploration
- Kapstroi Construction
Irkutsk
- Irgiredmet Institute
IRC Ltd. (non-core)(1)
London
- Petropavlovsk Plc
- Corporate headquarters
Open-pit mine
Underground mine
POX Hub
Analytical labs
R&D
Offices
(1) 31.1% equity interest
7.6Moz Gold mined to date
18 year Average mine life
1 of only two POX plants in
Russia
620 - 720koz 2020e production
A premium-listed Russian gold miner and processor with strong technical capabilities
4
Investment Highlights
Exploitable long life mineral resource base (20.5Moz) with additional
expansion potential (2,600km2 licence area)
2
Strategic location and access to developed infrastructure
3
Strong track record of mine development, expansion + asset optimisation
4
Strong and experienced Board, fully compliant with the UK Corporate Governance Code
6
Future production growth and optionality to process refractory ore at the
Pressure Oxidation (POX) Hub
1
Experienced management team and skilled workforce, in-house technical
expertise and R&D facilities
5
ESG focus: sustainable development is a key focus for the Group
7
A major Russian gold producer, operating in the Far East of Russia for over 25 years
5
0m
50m
100m
150m
200m
250m
4p
5p
6p
7p
8p
9p
10p
11p
12p
13p
14p
Jan 2019 Apr 2019 Jul 2019 Oct 2019 Jan 2020
Price Vols
Premium listing on the London Stock Exchange
Share price and key market drivers(1)
Share price and trading volumes(1)
(1) As at 17 Jan 2020
(2) As at 31 Dec 2019
Shareholder structure(2)
Roman Trotsenko(via Fincraft Holdings Ltd
& VTB Bank)22.4%
Prosperity Capital Mgt
13.5%
Everest Alliance Ltd
7.5%
Fortiana Holdings4.6%Slevin Ltd
4.6%
Abu Dhabi Investment Authority
4.5%
Norges Bank Investment Mgt 4.0%
Canaccord Genuity Wealth Mgt2.9%
Hargreaves Lansdown Asset Mgt2.6%
Dimensional Fund Advisors1.9%
Legal & General Investment Mgt1.8%
Ontario Teachers Pension Plan Board
1.0%
East Capital1.0%
Other27.6%
Price (GBP, pence) 12.80p
52 Week Range 6.72p – 13.16p
Avg. Daily Vol (12m) 7,040,004
Shares outstanding 3,310,210,281
Market Cap. £428.3m (US$556.7m)
EV £880.9m (US$1,131.2m)
Gold PM Fix $1,559/oz
52 Week Range US$1,265/oz - US$1,611/oz
USD:RUB FX 61.57
52 Week Range 60.99 – 66.95
6
2019 Achievements and 2020 Goals
A significant business turnaround has been achieved, with a clear set of goals for 2020
2019 Achievements
Production
✓ 42% yoy increase in gold production to 517.3koz
✓ Avg. realised gold price of US$1,346/oz (+7% vs. FY 2018)
Flotation and POX
✓ Malomir flotation fully ramped-up, operating above design
parameters
✓ POX plant commissioned ahead of schedule and successfully
ramped-up
Balance Sheet
✓ S&P upgrade outlook to Positive affirming B- rating
Corporate
✓ Convertible bond issue refinanced at a lower coupon
✓ IRC loan refinanced with a more favorable payment schedule
Responsible business / ESG
✓ LTIFR dropped by 36% to 1.61 accidents per 1m hours worked
✓ Joined UN Global Compact Initiative on Corporate Sustainability
✓ 2 x new female Independent Non-Executive Directors appointed
bringing female representation up to c.22%
2020 Goals
Production
✓ Gold production guidance of 620koz - 720koz, including third
party concentrate
✓ Focus on operational efficiencies + cost optimisation at existing
operations
Flotation and POX
✓ Ongoing expansion of POX Hub → reduction in unit costs via
the processing of third party concentrates
✓ Pioneer flotation construction to double Group refractory ore
processing capacity from 3.6Mtpa to 7.2Mtpa, on schedule for
Q4 2020 launch
Balance Sheet
✓ Focus on net debt reduction targeting an ultimate Net Debt /
EBITDA ratio of 2x
Corporate
✓ Hedge book closed out → full exposure to strong gold price
environment
✓ IRC disposal to realise value from non-core assets
Responsible business / ESG
✓ Continued focus on ESG best practice + improving health and
safety
7
Q4 / FY 2019
Operating Results
8
Q4 / FY 2019 Production Performance
Total 2019 gold production increase of 42% to 517.3koz vs. 2018
Koz
POX
FY 2019 vs. 2018 production by mine-site
Koz
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019 2018 2019
Malomir Albyn Pioneer POX Plant
(3rd party concentrates)
77.6
180.3
151.0
170.9
120.4
135.1
45.7
POX RIP
RIP
RIP
RIP RIPRIP
POX
Malomir (47.6koz Q4 / 180.3koz FY 2019)
– Following 2018 flotation commissioning, Malomir has been
transitioning from mining non-refractory to mainly refractory
ores for POX processing, resulting in lower non-refractory
volumes through the mill as processing switched
– Flotation plant exceeded design rate / recovery, allowing for
processing of lower grade material
– Mining of non-refractory ore in Q4 was mainly at
underground workings with some non-refractory gold from
transitional ores at the upper horizons of the Central pit
Albyn (44.7koz Q4 / 170.9koz FY 2019)
– Strong FY performance due to increased volumes of higher-
grade ore from lower sections of main ore body + southern
flank
– In Q4, production from Albyn pit was slightly above budget in
terms of mining, processing, production
Pioneer (36.9koz Q4 / 120.4koz FY 2019)
– Processing of harder ores from bottom of the pits resulted in
a c.12% decrease in milled ore volumes
– As a result, despite achieving higher recoveries + grades,
overall production was slightly lower y.o.y.
POX 3rd party concentrates (32.5koz Q4 / 45.7koz FY 2019)
– 32.5kt processed @ 61.6g/t, 94.9% recovery
– Gold doré production lower than gold recovered due to
fluctuation of gold in circuit
+13% -11%+132%
RIP
9
50.25
45.33
FY 2018 FY 2019
1.01
0.90
FY 2018 FY 2019
12.03
10.40
FY 2018 FY 2019
Reporting in line with international standards
FY 2019 Environmental Performance
2.521.61
FY 2018 FY 2019
Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR)Accidents per million hours
Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) Intensity Normalised per ounce of gold produced, t CO2e/oz
Energy IntensityGJ/oz
Water Intensitym3/oz
-36% -14%
-11% -10%
― Significant drop in LTIFR was a result of several Company initiatives, including an increase in health and safety training and stricter onsite
safety monitoring procedures
― An increase in overall production has led to an inevitable rise in energy and water consumption on an absolute basis
― However, the efficient use of resources across the company’s operations, the intensity of consumption has fallen on a per ounce
basis as evidenced by a reduction in GHG intensity
10
POX: Technology Driven
Growth
11
— “Refractory” ore contains gold encapsulated in
sulphides which resists recovery via standard methods
— Sulphides need to be broken down chemically or
mechanically
— “Double refractory” ore also contains carbon, which
impacts recoveries → special measures are required to
neutralise carbon’s effect
Main Options to Treat Gold Bearing Refractory Ores
POX: Introduction To Refractory And Double Refractory Gold OresPOX – one of the most efficient and environmentally-friendly ways to extract gold from
refractory ore
High Grade Concentrate
Pressure Oxidation
(POX)
Bio Oxidation
(BIOX)
Ultra-Fine
Grinding
Roasting
1. POX: oxidation in an
autoclave: high pressure
+ temperature
2. Roasting: oxidation
via high temperature
roasting
3. BIOX: oxidation using
bacteria
4. UFG: fine grinding
releases gold
encapsulated in sulphides
or other minerals
‒ 65% (5.2Moz) of the Group’s total Reserves (8.2Moz) are refractory
‒ 60% (12.3Moz) of the Group’s total Resources (20.5Moz) are refractory
(1) As at 31 Dec 2018, in accordance with the JORC Code 2012. Reserves are shown as Proven + Probable. Resources are inclusive of Reserves
By design, our POX Hub is able to treat some of the most
technologically complex refractory ore concentrates
2.0Moz
0.2Moz2.7Moz
0.4Moz
5.3Moz
Total
38%
51%
3%
8%
Pioneer
open-pit
2.0Moz
Albyn
open-pit
0.4Moz
Malomir
open-pit
2.7Moz
Pioneer
U/G
0.2Moz
4.2…
0.3Moz6.7Moz
1.1Moz
12.3Moz
Total
34%
54% 2%
9%
Albyn
open-pit
1.1Moz
Malomir
open-pit
6.7Moz
Pioneer
U/G
0.3Moz
Refractory Reserves(1) Refractory Resources (1)Refractory + Double Refractory Ore
Pioneer
open-pit
4.2Moz
12
The POX Hub is well positioned in terms of easy access and well developed infrastructure
The POX Hub
Blagoveshchensk
Albyn
Pilot POX Plant
Malomir
Pioneer
Pokrovskiy POX Hub
Fevralsk(1)
(1) Fevralsk and Tygda are rail loading facilities
Tygda(1)
Concentrate Transportation: Malomir to POX
Km
Truck: Malomir to Fevralsk 166
Rail: Fevralsk to Tygda 1,134
Truck: Tygda to POX Hub 18
Total 1,318
CHINA
Operating mines
Underground mine
POX
Analytical labs
Hydro power plant
Railway
Transportation route
13
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
2018a 2019a 2020e 2021e 2022e
Pioneer Malomir Albyn 3rd Party
POX to reach full potential by 2021, with 65% of ores mined being refractory(1)
(1) Assumes 3rd flotation line at Malomir from 2021
(2) Capacity ranges depend on concentrate parameters, particularly Sulphur content
Capacity Range(2)
POX: The Heart of Our Future Strategy
Pioneer Malomir 3rd Party Ore
Contribution of Refractory Ores at Malomir +
Pioneer (Mtpa)(1)POX ramp-up (ktpa)(1)(2)
2 a
uto
clave
s4 a
uto
clave
s
Conce
ntrate
(kt
)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
2019a 2020e 2021e 2022e
Pioneer non-ref Pioneer flotation
Malomir non-ref Malomir flotation
Albyn non-ref % Refractory (RHS)
Pio
neer
Malo
mir
Alb
yn
% of total which
is refractory
14
POX Processing Costs: Fixed vs. Variable
Overall POX processing costs decline rapidly to c.US$100/t as throughput is increased
Throughput (ktpa) Variable CostFixed Cost
– Through the early ramp-up period in H1 2019, the
proportion of fixed costs was c.2/3 of total POX
processing costs
– The share of fixed costs decreases as plant
utilisation increases
– H1 2019 processing cost equated to around
US$230/t concentrate, which fell to c.US$180/t in
H2 2019
– As throughput is increased to full capacity,
unit processing costs decline rapidly to
c.US$100/t
0
50
100
150
200
250
H1 2019 H2 2019 FY 2019 FY 2020 FY 2021 FY 2022
76kt
450kt
340kt
188kt
112kt
Fixed costs decrease rapidly
on a per tonne basis as
throughput is increased
US
$/t
FY 2019 to FY 2020H1 to H2 2019
Unit cost of processing and throughput rates Comment
450kt
15
Autoclave Peer Analysis
POX technology around the world
Project Start POX Feed POX Capacity Autoclaves Temp Pressure ~S Feed Reserves
Pueblo Viejo 2012 Whole Ore 24,000tpd 4 230C 3,450kPa 6.8% 2.8g/t
Goldstrike 1990 Whole Ore 16,000tpd 6 220C 2,900kPa 2.5% 3.9g/t
Copler 2018 Whole Ore 6,000tpd 2 220C 3,150kPa 4.8% 2.8g/t
Lihir 1997Whole Ore &
Concentrate25,000tpd 4 205C 2,650kPa 6.0% 2.3g/t
Twin Creeks 1997Whole Ore &
Concentrate10,400tpd 2 225C 3,170kPa 4.5% 1.8g/t
Kittila 2008 Concentrate 870tpd 1 207C 2,500kPa 18.0% 4.7g/t
Amursk 2012 Concentrate 616tpd 1 200C 2,170kPa 6.5% 5.2g/t
Porgera 1990 Concentrate 16,400tpd 4 197C 1,750kPa 14.0% 4.8g/t
Macraes 1999 Concentrate 650tpd 1 225C 3,140kPa 9.0% 1.1g/t
Corrego do Sitio 2011 Concentrate 240tpd 1 230C 3,600kPa 7.8% 4.1g/t
Pokrovskiy 2018 Concentrate 1,370tpd 4 225C(1) 3,500kPa(1) 23.0% 1.0g/t
Stibnite (Project) 2023E Concentrate 20,000tpd 1 220C 2,400kPa 5.5% 1.6g/t
Donlin (Project) 2025E Concentrate 8,500tpd 2 220C 3,250kPa 7.0% 2.1g/t
Lagunas Norte
(Project)2026E Concentrate 6,000tpd 1 - - 8.0% 2.9g/t
Certej (Project) - Concentrate 2,600tpd 2 230C 3,547kPa 13.0% 1.7g/t
(1) Pokrovskiy POX Hub achieved autoclave pressure of 3,000kPa and a temperature of 220˚С, as ramp-up to design parameters continues
16
POX: A World Class TeamA world class research and development expertise lead by a world class team
Gidrometallurgia: Petropavlovsk’s Scientific Research Centre, established to support the POX project
— Unique laboratory, created the concept of the POX project for the Group, including key technological parameters
— Equipped with state of the art autoclave laboratory facilities (laboratory + pilot testing, feasibility work + audits)
— Unique team of 40 specialists incl. PhD holders, who have undertaken a range of work for c.30 third party companies in addition to POG
Irgiredmet: The Irkutsk Research Institute of Precious and Rare Metals and Diamonds
— Founded in 1871, over 140 years of expertise in R&D, design + engineering
— Helped to develop flotation process / testing, laboratories performed autoclave leaching tests
— 10 specialised technological laboratories with c.300 highly qualified staff, more than 25 patents in the fields of mining / metallurgy
— Annually carries out more than c.200 researches assignments for third party companies, incl. R&D activities to help develop new deposits
Pilot Test Plant: Petropavlovsk’s experimental industrial model pilot processing plant
— Launched in 2009, the plant is the first and only of its kind in Russia
— Small scale autoclave to test all parameters of the process
— Unique asset giving Petropavlovsk the flexibility to test any type of gold recovery process on a smaller scale
— Also carries out test work / scenario analysis for external third party companies
Our partners and industry specialists: over 20 leading industry companies contracted to help us successfully develop / launch the
POX Hub
— Shanghai Morimatsu (autoclaves), LOTERIOS SpA(pressure pipe lines), DSB Säurebau GmbH (titanium inner gear + autoclave linings),
Outotec (flotation, control / automation equipment), Feluwa Pumpen GmbH (acid resistant high-pressure slurry pumps), MOGAS
Industries (valves), Red Mountain Energy Corporation (oxygen plant)
PHM Engineering: engineering and construction supervision of the Group’s processing assets, including the POX Hub
— Responsible for new project feasibility work, technical design, permitting, equipment selection, oversight of manufacturing process,
installation, commissioning
— Over 50 employees including PhD holders
17
Balance Sheet
18
Liquidity and Debt Overview
Recent bond restructuring has strengthened near-term liquidity position
Refractory
Refractory978
638 611 596 594
930
610 599 585 568
3.7x
3.5x
3.0x 3.0x
4.0x
2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 - 2022
Total debt Net debt Net debt / Underlying EBITDA
Target
c.2.0x
FY 2018 EBITDA affected by
refractory concentrate
stockpile build-up during POX
commissioning phase
Targeting mid-term Net Debt / EBITDA of c.2.0x
100
500
125
2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026
US$125m
convertible bond
matures
Jul 2024 with
8.25% coupon
US$500m notes
maturing Nov 2022
with 8.125%
coupon
Group debt maturity schedule (US$m)
19
B (Outlook Positive)
(upgraded from CCC)
Last review: Aug 2019
Improving Credit RatingH
igh
lig
hts
– POX commissioning to have a positive impact on 2019
financials
– IRC debt refinancing to improve liquidity position
– Development of underground operations
– Expanding the Board reinforced corporate governance
Up
sid
e
Tri
gg
ers
Successful convertible bond refinancing
2019 EBITDA growth in line with S&P base case
Improved credit metrics backed by potential sale of IRC stake
Building up successful POX track record
Delivery on revised business strategy
Do
wn
sid
e
Tri
gg
ers 2019 EBITDA may not materially improve vs. 2018
Difficulty in refinancing the US$100m convertible bond due
2020
B- (Outlook Positive)
(outlook upgraded from Negative)
Last review: Oct 2019
– Significant strengthening in liquidity position
– Convertible bond successfully refinanced
– Repayment of US$57m bridging loan by IRC
– Increased visibility for production following POX commissioning
– Significant deleveraging by end-2020
– Improved corporate governance
FFO adjusted gross leverage remaining sustained below 4x
Sustained FCF margin with funds used for reduction of gross debt
Improvement of production volumes and cash costs
Improvement in corporate governance
Deterioration of liquidity and / or aggressive dividend distributions
Failure to improve production volumes
Source: S&P and Fitch rating reports
An improved credit rating reduces the Company’s cost of capital
Key highlights from latest report Key highlights from latest report
20
Responsible Business
21
Sustainable Development
Maintaining leading ESG Practices
— Full compliance with applicable health and safety legislation
— H&S management systems
— Regular external + internal audits / inspections
— Development of safety culture
— Risk management to mitigate impact
— High quality task specific training
Health and Safety
— Full compliance with UK Corporate Governance Code
— Safety, Sustainability and Workforce Committee formed in Nov
2018
— Annual review + publication of a revised Modern Slavery
Statement
— Remuneration disclosure
— Established Code of Conduct and Business Ethics
Corporate Governance
— Environmental Management system compliant with GOST R
ISO 14001- 2016 (ISO 14001:2015)
— Optimisation of energy consumption, water recycling, GHG
monitoring + reporting in line with international standards
— Strict control cyanide management
— Fully compliant + insured tailing management facilities
— Ongoing land rehabilitation + conservation of biodiversity
— Effective waste management (31% of all waste is reused)
Environmental Management
— Major tax payer in Amur region
— Active engagement with Indigenous communities
— Establishment of POX Hub part of government’s policy to develop
Russian Far East
— Accessible and effective grievance procedure
— Trade Union: 1,616 members, 18% of employees
— Equal career opportunities regardless of gender
— Pokrovskiy Mining College
Social Responsibility
Petropavlovsk is not only fully compliant with regional, national + international legislation, but is striving to
perform in line with best industry practices
22
Strong corporate governance supported by an experienced Board
Dr Pavel Maslovskiy (N) (S) (E*)
Chief Executive Officer
– Re-appointed in Jun 2018– Сo-founded the Company in 1994– CEO of Petropavlovsk 1994-2011
(when acted as Senator-Member to Federation Council) and again 2014-2017
Sir Roderic Lyne (N*)
Non-Executive Chairman
– Appointed as Chairman following Jun
2018 AGM
– Previously was a Non-Ex. Director of
Aricom PLC and Petropavlovsk PLC
– Served as British Ambassador to
Russia from Jan 2000 until Aug 2004
Mr Damien Hackett (N) (A) (R) (S)
– Appointed Oct 2018– Mr Hackett is Chairman of UrAmerica– Has 26 years critical research
experience covering globally diverse mining companies
– Former Vice Chairman Mining Advisory at Canaccord Genuity
Mr Mirzaaziz Musakhanov
– Nominated by AEON Mining Ltd, our largest shareholder, appointed Non-Executive Director on 14 Oct 2019
– Chairman of the Board at NovaportGroup and a Director at GeoProMiningGroup
– Over 20 years of experience in financing and industry
Mr Robert Jenkins(A*) (R*) (N)
– Re-appointed June 2018– 25 years of Russia-related investment /
natural resources experience– Previously CFO of two Russia-focused
natural resources companies– Formerly held Board appointments
with Ruspetro PLC and Toledo Mining PLC
Mr Harry Kenyon-Slaney (S*) (A) (N)
– Appointed Nov 2018, became Senior
Independent Director April 2019
– Currently holds positions of Non-Ex.
Chairman at Gem Diamonds, Non-Ex.
Director at Sibanye Gold
– 33 years experience, principally with
Rio Tinto
(S) Member of the Safety, Sustainability and Workforce Committee
(N) Member of the Nominations Committee
(A) Member of the Audit Committee
Board fully compliant with the UK Corporate Governance Code
(R) Member of the Remuneration Committee * Denotes role of Chairman of the Committee
(E) Chairman of the Executive Committee
Ms Charlotte Philipps (A) (R)
– Appointed Nov 2019– Extensive natural resources sector
corporate finance and transactional experience across CIS / CMEA
– Member of the Strategy / Investment Committee at Inter RAO
– Member of the Advisory Board of CAPTIS Intelligence Inc.
– Previously held senior positions at EBRD and AIG Russia Century Fund
Mrs Katia Ray (R) (S)
– Appointed Nov 2019– Over 25 years’ of mining sector
experience in senior leadership roles with Rio Tinto plc and Anglo American plc
– Founded a management consulting firm advising corporate mining companies and private equity groups and start-ups
11%
11%
67%
11%
9Directors
Non-Executive Chairman
Non-Executive Director
Indep. Non-Exec. Directors
Executive Director
Mr James W Cameron Jr (A) (R)
– Appointed Oct 2018
– Formerly Founder, CEO + Chairman
of Occupational Urgent Care Systems
– Extensive experience, providing
expertise and consulting services for
companies in Russia and the former
USSR
23
Sustainability Management and Governance
The Board of Directors has appointed committees at Board level to oversee different aspects of
business, risks and performance
Board of Directors
Structure for the Monitoring + Reporting of
Sustainability Performance Data
1HSE Performance data is collected
by key operational management
2Data + summary
reports are submitted to the CEO + Deputy
CEO3
Data + summary reports submitted by
Deputy CEO to Executive + HSE
Committees
4A summary is made to the
Board of Directors
5Recommendations
are given to key operational
management, which then provides BoD
with feedback
The newly formed Safety, Sustainability & Workforce Committee
(SS&W) is responsible for:
— Reviewing + monitoring health, safety, environmental, sustainability
processes + procedures
— Assisting with the community relations + workforce engagement
The Executive Committee
— Consists of both Executive Directors + key
operational management
— Responsible for overseeing implementation of
strategy, business targets + decisions made at Board
level, including decisions made by SS&W Committee
— Reviewing internal control and risk management
Dr Pavel MaslovskiyChief Executive Officer
Mr Damien HackettNED
Mr Harry Kenyon -SlaneyChairman
Dr Alya SamokhvalovaDeputy CEO
24
10,343
7,080
6,652
6,053
5,813
5,316
5,105
4,387
4,362
4,338
2,073
Polyus
New Gold Incorporated
Anglogold Ashanti
Sibanye
Kinross
Petropavlovsk
Barrick Gold
Gold Fields
Polymetal
Eldorado Gold Company
Centamin
Energy consumption
(GJ / US$m of revenue)
Greenhouse gas emissions (СО2)
(tonnes / US$m of revenue)
LTIFR(2)
(cases per million working hours)
Women employees
(share of the total number of employees)
24.6%
20.0%
16.0%
15.4%
15.2%
13.0%
12.1%
12.0%
11.0%
10.0%
2.0%
Petropavlovsk
Polymetal
Gold Fields
Polyus
New Gold Incorporated
Sibanye
Barrick Gold
Anglogold Ashanti
Kinross
Eldorado Gold Company
Centamin
1,776
1,101
795
759
612
566
480
464
460
450
397
Sibanye
Polyus
Anglogold Ashanti
Petropavlovsk
Centamin
Gold Fields
Polymetal
New Gold Incorporated
Kinross
Eldorado GoldCompany
Barrick Gold
1.18
1.14
0.50
0.45
0.33
0.26
0.24
0.15
0.09
0.09
0.07
Sibanye
Anglogold Ashanti
Petropavlovsk
Gold Fields
Eldorado Gold Company
Centamin
New Gold Incorporated
Barrick Gold
Polyus
Polymetal
Kinross
Sources: Thomson Reuters, company data
(1) Data for full year 2018
(2) Reporting standards vary, it is not always apparent whether all accidents are reported by a company. Petropavlovsk reports accidents at all facilities while
Russian legislation dictates to report the accidents at hazardous facilities only
ESG Performance Benchmarking(1)
Petropavlovsk vs. major gold companies
Well positioned among peers in terms of implementing ESG standards, with some social aspects better vs. peers (eg.
share of female employees). Room for further improvement to obtain an improved ESG rating in the mid-term
25(1) World Wide Fund for Nature Russia 2018
(2) CSR Hub 2018
Sustainable RatingsWell positioned among peers in the framework of Environmental responsibility and
sustainability disclosure
ESG/CSR Rating(2)
(out of 100)
80 79 74 73 73 72 69 68 67 64 1.59
1.43 1.331.04
0.53 0.48 0.38
Kin
ros
s
Po
lyu
s
Po
lym
et
al
No
rdg
ol
d
Pe
tro
pa
vlo
vs
k
Hig
hla
nd
Go
ld
Go
ld o
fK
am
ch
atk
a
Score of 69 (out of 100)
based on Petropavlovsk’s
disclosure of information
Community
Employees
Environment
Governance
The Transparency Rating of Environmental
Responsibility Project for M+M Companies of Russia(1)
Overall Rating
22 place2018 (0.27)
24 place2017 (0.53)
Ecological Management
17 place2018 (0.71)
25-26 place2017 (0.13)
Environmental Impact
22-34 place2017 (0.13)
22-34 place2018 (0.36)
Information Disclosure
23-31 place2018 (0.50)
18 place2017 (0.56)
— Well positioned among the peers
— Second best group (60-79)
Improved rating in every category, with the exception of
Information Disclosure, an area where the Company has the
opportunity to improve in 2019
26
Corporate Strategy
27
Strategic Priorities
Asset rationalisation, organic and inorganic growth options
(1) Petropavlovsk is a 31.1% holder of IRC. Gazprombank has been mandated to assess Petropavlovsk’s options
Opportunities Goal Implementation
Str
eam
lin
ing
the b
usin
ess
IRC sale
‒ Eliminate IRC loan guarantee
‒ Improve credit rating
‒ Improve balance sheet metrics
‒ Focus on gold
‒ Achieve higher market multiples
‒ Disposal of 31.1% controlling stake to a
strategic investor alongside a transfer of the
loan guarantee(1)
‒ Alongside subsequent sale of the IRC stake, an
agreement with Gazprombank to eliminate IRC
guarantee
Org
an
ic G
row
th
Elginskoye
‒ Extend mine life at Albyn
‒ Utilise existing infrastructure
‒ Maximise IRR
‒ Construction of mine at Elginskoye
‒ Construction of road to Albyn plant
‒ Transportation of ore to Albyn RIP
Increase feed of POX
plant by processing
own concentrates
‒ Optimise POX utilisation
‒ Secure concentrates with the best
margins
‒ Maximise IRR
‒ Construction of Pioneer flotation plant (initially 2
lines) with further expansion (3rd flotation line)
‒ Expansion of flotation plant at Malomir (3rd
flotation line)
Ino
rgan
ic G
row
th
New Business
‒ Improve grade of POX feed material
‒ Increase POX utilisation
‒ Expand margins + increase production
‒ Identification of higher grade refractory assets
which can’t be developed at this moment
‒ Identification of the most effective way to bring
together synergies of these assets and the
processing capacity of the POX Hub
Autoclaves
5 + 6 (JV option)
‒ Fully benefit from POX facilities and
POG’s comprehensive in-house R&D
capabilities
‒ Financed by JV partner
‒ Adjustment of the technological process to
process complex material (eg. triple refractory)
28
Organic Growth: Elginskoye to Replace Albyn Pit
Ore body shape is favourable for a low strip-ratio / low dilution operation
– Elginskoye is predominantly a non-refractory ore body, located c.30km west of Albyn plant
– 2.8Moz of JORC Resources including 1.5Moz of JORC Reserves (at avg. 1.1g/t)
– Shallow dipping mineralised zones suitable for low cost open pit mining
– Preparation started to commence production in 2020
– Access road completed
– First mining equipment has been transferred from Albyn to site
– Estimated gold production of c.156koz in 2020
29
Inorganic Opportunities: Refractory Deposits in Russia
A large number of known refractory deposits exist in the region and across Russia
POX Hub
Olimpiada
(Polyus)
41.4Moz @ 2.9g/t
Mayskoye
(Polymetal)
2.8Moz @ 11.4g/t
Veduga
(Polymetal)
0.9Moz @ 4.8g/t
Kyuchus
(Govt. owned)
6.9Moz @ 9.3g/t
Nezhdaninskoye
(Polymetal)
7.9Moz @ 5.0g/t
Albazino
(Polymetal)
1.6Moz @ 4.6g/t
Taseevskoye
(Highland Gold)
5.1Moz @ 5.1g/t
Itakinskoye
1.3Moz @ 6g/t
Kluchevskoye
(Sun Gold /
China Gold)
2.5Moz
Malomir
6.9Moz @ 0.8g/t
Bogolubovskoye
(NOK)
2.3Moz
Pioneer
5.9Moz @ 0.7g/t
Nasedkino
(Mangazeya
Mining)
0.9Moz @ 2.1g/t
Poputninskoye
(Polyus)
4.3Moz @ 3.2g/t
Zmeinoye
(Polyus)
0.4Moz @ 4.6g/t
30
Inorganic Growth: 3rd Party Refractory Concentrates Market
Concentrate markets in Russia and Kazakhstan
Mine OwnerOwn
FacilitiesExports
Tonnes
Available (Kt)
Potential Tonnes
Available (Kt)
Olimpiada (Au)(2) Polyus ✘ ✔ 50
Olimpiada (Au,Sb)(2) Polyus ✘ ✔ 150
Bogolyubovskoye NGOK ✘ ✔ 30
Udereyskoye NGOK ✘ ✔ 35
Drazhnoe GV Gold ✘ ✔ 20
Badran Zapadnaya ✘ ✔ 10
Mayskoye(3) Polymetal ✘ ✔ 57
Total available volumes 145 207
Refractory Mines in Russia and Concentrate Availability (Ktpa)
(1) Petropavlovsk’s process can stabilise arsenic as scorodite which offers a more environmentally-friendly approach to roasting
(2) Olimpiada produces two types of flotation concentrates: 150Ktpa of concentrate is sold with an antimony content of up to 30% and 50Ktpa of gold
concentrates containing some antimony
(3) 57Ktpa of Mayskoye concentrate, which is not processed at the Amursk POX plant, may be available
1. Russia: 40% of gold resources are refractory
— Only limited refractory treatment capacity exists including two POX plants
— The majority of concentrates are exported to China
— Russia has declared gold as strategic asset and intends to prohibit exports of concentrates
— For environmental reasons, China is shutting down roasters - particularly those treating high arsenic / antimony(1)
2. Kazakhstan: another source of refractory concentrates
— Four refractory mines currently produce flotation concentrate, with potential to expand further.
— Petropavlovsk has secured 20Kt grading 40g/t to 50g/t which it is currently processing at recoveries of 95%
31
Autoclaves 5 + 6 (JV Option)
Potential for a JV with another refractory producer or developer
– Existing onsite infrastructure enables two additional autoclaves lines (5 + 6) to be added, although some expansion of
oxygen capacity will be required
– Given the large number of refractory ore bodies in the region, the Company believes the development could be
funded via a JV with another refractory developer or producer
– Adjustment in technology can be made to process very complex refractory materials, including:
– Pyrrhotite-containing concentrates
– Bio-cakes
– Cuprous gold-bearing concentrates
– Carbonaceous concentrates from other deposits
– Concentrates obtained from the tails of existing mills
32
Conclusions
33
Summary: A Conservative Strategy Focused on Shareholder Returns
A holistic strategy directed at improving long-term shareholder returns
— Addition of 2 more autoclaves to the existing 4
— 50% total processing capacity uplift from 400 – 500Ktpa to 500 – 750Ktpa
— Autoclaves 1 to 4 to process own refractory ore, while 5 + 6 to process 3rd party material (JV
opportunities)
POX capacity
expansion
IRC:
realising value from
non-core assets
— Options include: improvements to existing guarantee structure, outright disposal , payment of a
dividend to Petropavlovsk
Committed to
exploration
— Continue to generate maximum value from core assets via ongoing exploration both surface +
underground
— Potential licence acquisitions adjacent to the existing infrastructure
Balance sheet
strengthening
— Improved cash generation via POX ramp-up
— Targeting Net Debt / EBTIDA of 2.0x
— Construction of new Pioneer flotation to double existing flotation capacity (Q4 2020 launch)
— Malomir 3rd flotation line planned for 2023, but may be accelerated
Increase production
of our own refractory
concentrate
— Focus on operational efficiencies and cost optimisation at existing operations
— Gold price hedging / forward sales agreements are complementary measures
Cost optimisation +
margins1
2
3
4
5
6
34
Peer Group Valuation Analysis
A re-rating is underway - Petropavlovsk was 2nd best performing stock in its peer group in 2019
EV / EBITDA (NTM) EV / Reserves (Gold Equivalent) Times (x)
Times (x)
US$/oz
Source: Thomson Reuters, as at 6 Jan 2020
P / CF (NTM) – av. 7.0x
8.77.9 7.9
7.1
5.6 5.6
4.5 4.2 3.9 3.8
5.9
Ba
rric
k G
old
Po
lym
eta
l
New
mon
t
Po
lyu
s
Hig
hla
nd
En
de
avo
ur
Cen
tam
in
Eld
ora
do
Cen
terr
a
Pe
trop
avlo
vsk
377 376 375
308
257220
201
140123
80
245
En
de
avo
ur
Po
lym
eta
l
Ba
rric
k G
old
Po
lyu
s
New
mon
t
Cen
tam
in
Hig
hla
nd
Pe
trop
avlo
vsk
Cen
terr
a
Eld
ora
do
11.7
9.48.5 8.1 7.6
6.85.9
4.4 4.1 3.8
7.0
Cen
tam
in
New
mon
t
Po
lym
eta
l
Ba
rric
k G
old
Po
lyu
s
Pe
trop
avlo
vsk
Hig
hla
nd
En
de
avo
ur
Cen
terr
a
Eld
ora
do
%
Market Performance (LTM)
156
92
77
43 40 3927 26
132
56E
ldo
rad
o
Pe
trop
avlo
vsk
Cen
terr
a
Ba
rric
k G
old
Po
lyu
s
Po
lym
eta
l
New
mon
t
Hig
hla
nd
En
de
avo
ur
Cen
tam
in
35
Appendix
36
History of the Group
0Mtpa
2Mtpa
4Mtpa
6Mtpa
8Mtpa
10Mtpa
12Mtpa
14Mtpa
16Mtpa
18Mtpa
20Mtpa
1999a 2002a 2003a 2004a 2005a 2006a 2007a 2008a 2009a 2010a 2011a 2012a 2013a 2014a 2015a 2016a 2017a 2018a
RIP + HL + Flotation Processing
First gold
from Pioneer
Pokrovskiy RIP
expanded
First gold
from Pokrovskiy
First gold
from Malomir
First gold
from Albyn
Pioneer RIP
commissioned
Moved to LSE
Main Board
Pioneer RIP
plant expanded
Pokrovskiy
RIP plant
commissioned
Listed on AIM
Malomir
RIP expanded
Albyn licence
and Malomir
main site
licence
acquired
Malomir
first
exploration
licence
acquired
Plant
expansions:
Pioneer, Malomir,
Albyn
Albyn
is commissioned
Pioneer RIP
expanded
Malomir RIP
plant
commissioned
Record gold
production of
741Koz
POX
construction
begins
POX
commissioning
First gold
recovered from
POX
Malomir
flotation line
commissioned
37
Mine By Mine JORC Resource Breakdown
New Resources at Pioneer, Albyn, Malomir + Pokrovskiy
Malomir Pioneer Albyn Pokrovskiy
Refractory Resources
Non-refractory Resources
6.7Moz
97%
0.2Moz
3%
1.4Moz
24%
1.1Moz
21%
4.5Moz
76%4.2Moz
79%
0.9Moz
100%
6.9Moz 5.9Moz 5.3Moz 0.9Moz
Total JORC Resources (as at 31/12/2018)
20.5Moz(1)8.2Moz
40%
12.3Moz
60%
Decrease due to
disposals + sterilisation
due at POX facility
Albyn main ore body +
Unglichikanskoye
Katrin
Nikolaevskya
Ulunginskaya
RIP tailings for
reprocessing via
flotation + POX and
Quartzitovoye
New Resources -
Explanation
(1)Total JORC Resources include Tokur asset, not shown in the split below. Tokur contains non-refractory Resources of 1.4Moz. For full details
please refer to the 2018 Petropavlovsk AR
38
A Comparison of Russian POX ProjectsThere are only two gold POX processing plants in Russia, with a third under
construction
Polymetal Amursk POX 1 Polymetal POX 2 Pokrovskiy POX Hub
Commissioned 2012 Q3 2023 Q4 2018
Number of autoclaves 1 1 4
Concentrate processing
capacity225Ktpa 250 - 300Ktpa 400 - 500Ktpa
Capex US$272m US$431m US$310m
Capital intensity US$1,210/t US$1,437/t - US$1,724/t US$620/t - US$775/t
Operational temperature 200 ˚С 240 ˚С 225 ˚С
Pressure 22 bar 43 bar 35 bar
POX recovery rate 97% 96% 93% - 98%
— A comparable amount of development capex was spent to develop the Pokrovskiy POX Hub vs. the Amursk POX 1 project despite
significant difference in processing capacity
— As such, the new Pokrovskiy POX facility has a low capital intensity
(1) The Pokrovskiy POX Hub achieved pressure of 30 bar and temperature of 220˚С. Ramp-up to design parameters continues
39
Malomir And Pioneer Flotation Concentrate Parameters
Design vs. actual performance
Malomir Pioneer
Design
(Stage 1)Parameter Design H1 2019a H2 2019e FY 2019e Comments
Ore
processing
1.8Mt (6m)
3.6Mtpa (FY)1.81Mt 1.8-2.0Mt 3.6-3.8Mt
H1 throughput on target, up to 10% increase in
H2 due to better equipment utilisation and
optimisation of processing operations
3.6Mtpa
Scheduled
ROM grades
1.25g/t -
1.35g/t 0.97g/t(1) 1.25-1.30g/t 1.10g/t
Flotation performance exceeded initial design
parameters, affording the opportunity to test
process low grade ore at c.0.7g/t in Q1 2019
The tests confirmed its feasibility, hence lower
than design processed grades in H1 2019
1.1g/t
Concentrate
yields5.5% 3.3% 3.5% 3.4% Up to 40% improvement in concentrate yield
vs. design: lower transportation and POX
processing costs and higher grade concentrate
2.90%
Concentrate
grades24g/t 26g/t 31g/t 28g/t 24.0g/t
Concentrate
volumes
100kt (6m)
200ktpa (FY)
59kt (6m)
120ktpa (FY)
61-70kt (6m)
120-140ktpa
(FY)
120-130kt
Up to c.40% decrease in processed tonnage
due to a positive decrease in yield: more gold
extracted into a smaller volume of concentrate
110ktpa
Recoveries 86% 87% 86% 86% Stable recoveries in line with the design 82%
— Stage 2 flotation expansion will increase capacity of Malomir and Pioneer flotation from 3.6 to 5.4 – 6.0Mtpa
— Similarly to Malomir, it is entirely possible that Pioneer flotation may outperform initial design parameters
(1) H1 2019a Malomir ROM grades included trial processing of lower grade refractory stripping material to understand the ability of the plant to
treat lower grade ore and the potential for lower cut-off grades
40
Option agreement to acquire outstanding 25% stake in TEMI LLC
The prospective Unglichikan, Afanasevskoye and Elginskoye deposits sit within TEMI
Option and purchase agreement
– On 23 Sept 2019, the Company entered an option
agreement to purchase outstanding 25% stake in TEMI
– Option price of US$13m payable by 18 Nov 2019
– US$7m cash payment made in May 2019
– US$6m outstanding may be paid in cash or shares at a
fixed price of £0.0826 / share
– Exercise priced depends on when payment is made:
– US$60.0m payable in May 2021, or
– US$53.5m on or before 20 May 2020
– Payable in whole or in part using shares or cash, at the
Company’s election
Future production
– Elginskoye ores are partly non-refractory and amenable to
processing at the Albyn RIP plant
– Production at Elginskoye to begin 2020, coinciding with
depletion of ore currently mined at Albyn main pit
– 156koz of possible production in 2020
JORC Reserves & Resources(1)
– Reserves (P&P) of 1.95Moz, of which 1.53Moz are non-
refractory
– Resources (M&I+I) of c.4.00Moz
Albyn
Afanasevskoye
Elginskoye
Unglichikan
Scale
= 5km
(1) As at 31 Dec 2018