pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and excretion of nomegestrol acetate in female rats
TRANSCRIPT
ORIGINAL PAPER
Pharmacokinetics, tissue distribution, and excretionof nomegestrol acetate in female rats
Qingbiao Huang • Xiaoke Chen • Yan Zhu •
Lin Cao • Jim E. Riviere
Received: 16 May 2014 / Accepted: 20 August 2014
� Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2014
Abstract Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC), a synthetic
progestogen derived from 19-norprogesterone, is an orally
active drug with a strong affinity for the progesterone
receptor. NOMAC inhibits ovulation and is devoid of
undesirable androgenic and estrogenic activities. The aim
of this study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics, tissue
distribution, and excretion of NOMAC in female rats.
Sprague–Dawley female rats were orally administered a
single dose of NOMAC (10, 20 or 40 mg/kg) and drug
plasma concentrations at different times were determined
by RP-HPLC. Tissue distribution at 1, 2, and 4 h and
excretion of NOMAC into bile, urine, and feces after
dosing were investigated. The results showed that NOMAC
was rapidly absorbed after oral administration, with tmax of
1–2 h. The plasma concentration–time curves were fitted in
a two-compartment model. The exposure to NOMAC (Cmax
and AUC) increased dose proportionally from 10 to 40 mg/
kg. The average CL and t1=2b were 5.58 L/(h�kg) and 10.8 h,
respectively. The highest concentrations of NOMAC in
ovary, liver, kidney, lung, heart, brain, spleen, muscle, and
uterus were observed at 2 h, whereas the highest concen-
trations in stomach, pituitary, and hypothalamus appeared at
1 h. The total cumulative excretion of NOMAC in feces
(0–72 h), urine (0–72 h), and bile (0–48 h) was*1.06, 0.03,
and 0.08 % of the oral administered dose, respectively. This
study indicated that NOMAC had a widespread distribution
in tissues, including ovary, pituitary, and hypothalamus,
which are main target tissues where NOMAC inhibits ovu-
lation. NOMAC was excreted via both feces and urine with
few unchanged NOMAC excreted. Enterohepatic circulation
was found in the drug elimination; however, it did not sig-
nificantly affect tmax.
Keywords Nomegestrol acetate � NOMAC �Pharmacokinetics � Tissue distribution � Excretion � HPLC
Abbreviations
NOMAC Nomegestrol acetate
HPLC High-pressure liquid chromatography
AUC Area under the plasma concentration–time
curve
CL Clearance
Cmax Maximum plasma concentration
V/F Apparent distribution volume
t1=2b Terminal half-life
tmax Time to maximum plasma concentration
Ka Absorption rate constant
K10 Elimination rate constant
Q. Huang and X. Chen contributed equally to this work.
Electronic supplementary material The online version of thisarticle (doi:10.1007/s13318-014-0224-7) contains supplementarymaterial, which is available to authorized users.
Q. Huang (&)
State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of
Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences,
Shanghai 201203, China
e-mail: [email protected]
X. Chen
Department of Research and Development, Pharmaceutics
International, Inc., Hunt Valley, MD 21031, USA
Y. Zhu � L. Cao (&)
Department of Reproductive Pharmacology, Shanghai Institute
of Planned Parenthood Research, Shanghai 200032, China
e-mail: [email protected]
J. E. Riviere
Institute of Computational Comparative Medicine, Kansas State
University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
DOI 10.1007/s13318-014-0224-7
K12 Distribution rate constant from the central
compartment to the peripheral compartment
K21 Distribution rate constant from the peripheral
compartment to the central compartment
a Rate constant associated with the distribution
phase of the concentration–time curve
b Rate constant associated with the terminal
phase of the concentration–time curve
1 Introduction
Nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) is a 19-norprogesterone
derivative with a high progestational activity, first reported
by Miyake and Rooks (1966). It is an orally active pro-
gestogen with a favorable tolerability profile and neutral
metabolic characteristics (Lello 2010). NOMAC is
designed to bind selectively for the progesterone receptor
and lacks significant affinity with other steroid receptors,
showing strong antiestrogenic and antigonadotropic activ-
ity, but without androgenic or glucocorticoid properties
(Lello 2010; van Diepen 2012; Ruan et al. 2012; Yang and
Plosker 2012). Unlike some other progestogens, the an-
tigonadotropic effect of NOMAC is mediated at the
hypothalamic and pituitary level (Couzinet et al. 1999).
In in vitro functional assay, nanomolar affinity of
NOMAC was demonstrated in radioligand binding with
cytosolic progesterone receptor in human endometrium
(Botella et al. 1988) and breast tissue (Duc et al. 1990), and
the potency of NOMAC was greater than progesterone.
NOMAC had no agonist or antagonist activity at a or bestrogen or mineralocorticoid receptors in Hela cells (a
human cervical carcinoma cell line) or CHO cells trans-
fected with human steroid receptors (Merk Sharp and
Dohme (Australia) Pty Limited 2011). In addition, NO-
MAC inhibited the estrogen-induced stimulation of pro-
gesterone receptor expression in T47-D human breast
cancer cells in vitro (van Diepen 2012).
NOMAC has been approved in Europe and Australia and
widely used for the treatment of gynecological disorders
(menstrual disturbances, dysmenorrhoea, and premenstrual
syndrome) (Alsina 2010) and for hormone replacement
therapy (HRT) in combination with estradiol (E2) for the
relief of post-menopausal symptoms (Shields-Botella et al.
2003). At a dosage of 1.25 mg/day, NOMAC inhibited
ovulation while follicle growth was not affected; at a dosage
of 2.5 or 5 mg/day, both ovulation and follicle development
were significantly suppressed (Bazin et al. 1987). The studies
on NOMAC/E2 as a combined oral contraceptive (COC)
showed that NOMAC preserved the beneficial hemostatic
effects of estrogen and had a neutral or beneficial effect on
lipid profiles, while not changing body weight and having no
adverse effects on glucose metabolism. In addition, NOMAC
showed a lack of proliferative activity in normal and can-
cerous breast tissues and did not have a deleterious effect on
bone remodeling (Lello 2010; van Diepen 2012; Yang and
Plosker 2012).
Despite NOMAC has been used in humans in some
developed countries, limited information on pharmacoki-
netics, tissue distribution (especially for targeted organs
including ovary, uterus, hypothalamic, and pituitary), and
excretion of NOMAC following a single oral administration
in animals and humans was available (or disclosed) in the
literature due to confidential reasons. In this study, RP-HPLC
method was adopted to determine NOMAC concentrations in
rat biological matrices, including plasma, tissues, urine,
feces, and bile. The pharmacokinetic profiles of NOMAC in
female rats were investigated, including (1) the plasma
pharmacokinetics of NOMAC; (2) the tissue distribution of
NOMAC; (3) the excretion of NOMAC in bile, urine, and
feces after oral administration. The results were also useful
for new formulation development in the future.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Chemicals and reagents
NOMAC (lot no. 980616, purity [99.2 %, Fig. 1) was
gifted from School of Pharmacy, Fudan University Medical
Center (Shanghai, China). Two internal standards (IS)
included flutamide (lot no. 981217, purity [99.2 %), pur-
chased from Fudan Forward Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd
(Shanghai, China) and mifepristone (lot no. 980607, purity
[99.8 %), obtained from Zhejiang Xianju Junye Pharma-
ceutical Co., Ltd (Zhejiang, China). Methanol (HPLC
grade) was purchased from Shanghai Chemical Reagent
Research Institute Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China). All other
chemicals and solvents were of the highest grade of com-
mercially available materials. Purified water obtained via a
Milli-Q system (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA) was used
throughout the experiments.
2.2 In vivo animal experiment
Healthy Sprague–Dawley female rats weighing 200–320 g
(certificate no. 02-49-2) were purchased from Shanghai
SLAC Laboratory Animal Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China).
Upon arrival in the laboratory, each animal was evaluated
by a laboratory veterinarian. The selected healthy female
rats were allowed to acclimate for at least 1 week before
the experiments. The animal room was maintained at
25 ± 2 �C and 50–70 % relative humidity with 12 h light/
dark cycles. Feed and municipal water were provided
ad libitum, except when feed was withdrawn *12 h before
dosing. The experiments were carried out in compliance
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
with Chinese Regulations for the Care and Use of Exper-
imental Animals. At the end of the experiment, pentobar-
bital sodium was used for the euthanasia of the animals.
2.3 Plasma collection and NOMAC extraction
Female rats were assigned randomly into three groups (five
rats per group) and received 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg NOMAC in
a solution of saline (0.5 % Tween-80), respectively, through
oral administration. By cutting the tails, blood samples
(800 lL) were collected into a clean test tube containing
sodium heparin before and 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24 h after
drug administration (group 1 in Table 1). Plasma was pre-
pared by centrifugation at 3,000 rpm for 5 min after the blood
samples were placed for 30 min, and then stored at -80 �C
until further analysis (within 4 weeks).
Extraction of NOMAC from plasma involved the addi-
tion of 10 lL (containing total 1 lg) flutamide (IS) and
3.0 mL diethyl ether into 500 lL of plasma sample (6:1,
v/v) in 5 mL centrifuging glass tube and vortex mixing for
1 min. The mixed samples were equilibrated at room
temperature for 5 min, extracted twice with diethyl ether
(3.0 mL) with vortex mixing for 5 min each time, and then
centrifuged at 3,000 rpm for 5 min. The organic and
aqueous layers were separated by allowing the mixture to
stand in room temperature for 10 min. The top (organic)
layer (2.5 mL) was transferred to glass tube and evaporated
to dryness under a stream of nitrogen at 40 �C. The dried
residue was then reconstituted with 30 lL of mobile phase
(methanol: water = 70:30, v/v) and centrifuged at
10,000 rpm for 5 min. After vortex mixing for 1 min, a
20-lL aliquot was injected into HPLC system for analysis.
2.4 Tissue distribution studies
Fifteen female rats were divided randomly into three
groups (five rats per group) and orally administered NO-
MAC in a solution of saline (0.5 % Tween-80) at a dose of
20 mg/kg. One additional rat was killed pre-dose to pro-
vide blank control tissues. The animals were killed at 1, 2,
or 4 h after the dosing (group 2 in Table 1). The tissues,
including liver, kidney, stomach, brain, heart, lung, muscle,
ovary, pituitary, hypothalamus, spleen, and uterus, were
promptly removed and washed with saline solution to
remove any residual blood. Each tissue sample (*0.5 g)
was homogenized with 1.5 mL saline using Polytron PT-
MR 3000 homogenizer (Kinematica AG, Switzerland) and
the leftover on the homogenizer was washed with 0.5 mL
saline and transferred to the same tube. Each sample was
added with 10 lL flutamide (IS). NOMAC was isolated
from the homogenate as described previously for the
plasma samples and stored at -80 �C until further analysis
(within 4 weeks).
2.5 Metabolism and excretion studies
Three female rats were orally administered a single dose of
NOMAC at 20 mg/kg in a solution of saline (0.5 %
Tween-80). The rats (n = 3) were then placed into separate
metabolic cages designed for the separation and collection
of urine and feces. Urine and feces were collected 3 h
before the dosing and 0–6, 6–12, (or 0–12), 12–24, 24–48,
and 48–74 h after the dosing (group 3 and 4 in Table 1).
Both urine and feces were collected in separate containers
surrounded by ice and then frozen at -80 �C at the end of
each collection interval for further analysis (within
4 weeks).
Polyethylene tubes were surgically cannulated into the
bile duct of female rats (n = 5). A 20 mg/kg dose of
NOMAC in a solution of saline (0.5 % Tween-80) was
orally administered to the rats. Bile was collected into
successive vials on ice at 3 h before the dosing as a blank
control and at 0–2, 2–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–24, 24–36, and
36–48 h after the dosing (group 5 in Table 1). The bile
samples were stored at -80 �C for further analysis (within
4 weeks). The volumes of urine and bile, and dry weight of
feces during each collection period were measured before
being stored in the refrigerator (Table 1).
Before HPLC analysis, the urine sample was added with
20 lL (containing 2 lg) mifepristone as IS. After liquid–
liquid extraction with diethyl ether for three times, the
organic layers were evaporated to dryness under a stream
of nitrogen at 40 �C. The residue was reconstituted in
30 lL mobile phase and then centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for
5 min after vortex mixing for 1 min. Twenty microliter
aliquot of the supernatant was injected into the HPLC
system. Fecal samples (50 mg) were dried at 80 �C for 2 h,
and then soaked in 1 mL methanol at 4 �C for 24 h. Five
hundred microliters of supernatant was transferred and
20 lL mifepristone (containing 2 lg) was added as IS. The
mixed samples were vertically blended for 2 min and then
Fig. 1 Chemical structure of NOMAC
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
extracted as described previously for urine. Bile sample
was subjected to the same procedure as described for urine.
2.6 HPLC analysis
Samples were analyzed using Waters� system equipped
with binary pump, on-line vacuum degasser, autosampler,
column compartment, UV detector, and Waters� Millen-
nium�32 software, as described previously (Huang et al.
2000, 2014). Chromatographic separation was achieved on
a lBondapak�-C18 column (300 9 3.9 mm, 5 lm; Waters
Instruments, Marlborough, MA) and a lBondapak�-C18
guard column. An isocratic mobile phase consisted of a
mixture of methanol and water (70:30, v/v, %) with a flow
rate of 1.2 mL/min, and the column temperature was
maintained at 25 ± 2 �C throughout the analysis. The
eluent was detected by UV detector with the wavelength
set at 293 nm. The HPLC chromatograms of the extracted
rat plasma, bile, and urine samples with the presence of IS
were shown in Fig. 2.
2.7 Pharmacokinetic and statistical analysis
The data of plasma concentration versus time for NOMAC
were analyzed using PK-GRAPH package (Yi 1992). The
pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by appropriate
compartmental methods. The goodness of fit and the most
appropriate model were determined by accessing the ran-
domness of the scatter of actual data points around the
fitted function. The Student’s t test was used to analyze
differences between two groups. The difference in two
groups of data with p-value of \0.05 or 0.01 was consid-
ered significant. The data were presented as mean ± SD.
3 Results
3.1 Plasma pharmacokinetics
Plasma concentration versus time was modeled by PK-
GRAPH package and the best fit was achieved by a two-
compartment model. A plot of mean plasma drug con-
centration versus time for oral administration of NOMAC
in female rats was shown in Fig. 3 and the pharmacokinetic
parameters were calculated and summarized in Table 2.
There were no significant differences in pharmacokinetic
parameters compared with groups of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg,
except AUC and Cmax. Both AUC and Cmax exhibited
linear increase with the dose administered (r2 [ 0.98,
p \ 0.01). The Cmax of NOMAC was obtained at 1–2 h
(tmax) after dosing, and the drug concentration decreased
slowly after Cmax. The t1=2b values for NOMAC were
13.14 ± 3.70, 9.33 ± 4.82, and 9.93 ± 3.71 h for dosing
groups of 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg, respectively. The values of
V/F and CL, as well as K10, were relatively constant
compared with three groups. The K12 and K21 values were
very similar in the same dosing group, and no significant
difference was observed among different groups
(p [ 0.05).
3.2 Tissue distribution
Tissue distribution studies in Sprague–Dawley female rats
after oral dose of 20 mg/kg revealed wide tissue distribu-
tion (Fig. 4). In three sampling times (1, 2, and 4 h), the
highest tissue concentrations of NOMAC were observed at
2 h after oral dosing, excluding stomach, pituitary, and
hypothalamus, whose highest concentrations appeared at
1 h. The stomach samples exhibited the highest drug
exposure. The mean Cmax values of ovary, liver, pituitary,
hypothalamus, and kidney were 6.4, 4.8, 3.9, 2.5, and
2.2 lg/g, respectively. Other tissues that displayed relative
high exposure were lung, heart, brain, and spleen. NOMAC
concentrations in muscle and uterus were very low (1.1 and
1.0 lg/g, respectively).
3.3 Urinary, fecal, and biliary excretion
The NOMAC excretion-time profiles for the urine and
feces within 72 h and the bile within 48 h following
20 mg/kg oral administration were described in Fig. 5. The
urinary and fecal excretions of NOMAC were completed
before 24 h, when the cumulative excretion curve reached
the maximum. However, biliary excretion seemed to con-
tinue after 48 h according to the ascending curve. The
cumulative percentages of intact NOMAC excreted
Table 1 Protocol for the pharmacokinetic study of NOMAC in rats
Group Tissues n Route Dose (mg/kg) Collection times
1 Plasma 15 Oral 10, 20, 40 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 24 h
2 Tissues 15 Oral 20 1, 2, and 4 h
3 Urine 3 Oral 20 –3–0, 0–6, 6–12, 12–24, 24–48 and 48–72 h
4 Feces 3 Oral 20 –3–0, 0–12, 12–24, 24–48 and 48–72 h
5 Bile 5 Oral 20 –3–0, 0–2, 2–4, 4–8, 8–12, 12–24, 24–36, and 36–48 h
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
Fig. 2 Representative HPLC
chromatograms of the extracted
plasma (a) biliary (b) urinary
(c) and fecal (d) samples
obtained from rats following a
single oral dose of 20 mg/kg of
NOMAC. Internal standards
(IS) in plasma and biliary
samples were flutamide; IS in
urinary and fecal samples were
mifepristone
Fig. 3 Mean plasma
concentration–time profile of
NOMAC after oral
administration of 10, 20, and
40 mg/kg of NOMAC to rats.
At 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and
24 h following NOMAC oral
administration, plasma samples
were collected and processed
for HPLC determination. Each
data point represents
mean ? SD of five rats
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
through the urine and feces within 72 h were 0.03 ± 0.01
and 1.06 ± 0.55 %, respectively. The cumulative per-
centage excreted to bile was 0.08 ± 0.01 % within 48 h.
4 Discussion
This study showed that NOMAC is rapidly absorbed into
the bloodstream, reaching maximum blood concentrations
at 1–2 h after dosing, which was similar to that observed in
mice, cynomogus monkeys (Merk Sharp and Dohme
(Australia) Pty Limited 2011), and humans(1.5–2 h)
(Gerrits et al. 2013). NOMAC was distributed fast in tis-
sues and excreted through feces and urine. The hepato-
enteral circulation occurred during drug elimination.
By comparing pharmacokinetic parameters of NOMAC
at 10, 20, and 40 mg/kg using the Student’s t test, no sig-
nificant difference was observed except for Cmax and AUC,
which were dose-proportional. This suggested that
NOMAC exhibited linear first-order pharmacokinetic
characteristics and no saturation of metabolism occurred in
the dose range of 10–40 mg/kg. The value of V/F in rats
was 60 L/kg, 2.5-fold larger than in humans (27 L/kg)
(Gerrits et al. 2013), which follows allometric principle.
The t1=2b of NOMAC was about 10 h, shorter than human
t1=2b (42 h) (Gerrits et al. 2013) due to the faster and more
extensive metabolism of NOMAC in animals compared
with humans (Merk Sharp and Dohme (Australia) Pty
Limited 2011).
Fig. 4 Tissue distribution of NOMAC in rats (n = 5) after a single
oral dose of 20 mg/kg. At 1, 2, and 4 h following oral administration,
tissue samples were collected and processed for HPLC determination.
Values are presented as mean ? SD
Table 2 Pharmacokinetic parameters following NOMAC administration to rats
Parameter Units Mean ± SD at different doses (mg/kg)
10 20 40
Ka h-1 3.87 ± 2.63 1.06 ± 1.06� 1.09 ± 0.53�•
a h-1 1.33 ± 1.62 1.01 ± 0.82� 0.37 ± 0.14�•
b h-1 0.06 ± 0.02 0.09 ± 0.03� 0.07 ± 0.02�•
t1=2ðKaÞ h 0.25 ± 0.15 1.49 ± 1.09� 0.74 ± 0.29�•
t1=2a h 1.63 ± 1.89 1.65 ± 1.95� 2.09 ± 0.90�•
t1=2b h 13.14 ± 3.70 9.33 ± 4.82� 9.93 ± 3.71�•
K10 h-1 0.12 ± 0.05 0.17 ± 0.11� 0.16 ± 0.10�•
K12 h-1 0.73 ± 1.06 0.55 ± 0.68� 0.10 ± 0.08�•
K21 h-1 0.54 ± 0.54 0.35 ± 0.29� 0.18 ± 0.01�•
V=F L/kg 68.46 ± 53.58 58.95 ± 33.22� 52.60 ± 20.59�•
CL L/h/kg 5.42 ± 1.09 5.87 ± 0.34� 5.44 ± 2.24�•
tmax h-1 0.99 ± 0.34 2.68 ± 1.56� 2.50 ± 0.60**•
Cmax ng/mL 143 ± 28 280 ± 91* 589 ± 65**#
AUC ng 9 h/mL 1,910 ± 404 3,417 ± 188** 8,698 ± 4,421**#
n = 5 per group; differences of pharmacokinetic parameters between groups 20 mg/kg (or 40 mg/kg) and 10 mg/kg: � p [ 0.05; * p \ 0.05; **
p \ 0.01; differences of pharmacokinetic parameters between groups 40 and 20 mg/kg: • p [ 0.05; # p \ 0.01
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
The distribution of NOMAC in tissues was rapid, with
the highest concentration observed at 2 h post-administra-
tion in most tissues. NOMAC had widespread tissue dis-
tribution in different tissues, including stomach, ovary,
liver, pituitary, kidney and hypothalamus, lung, heart,
brain, spleen, muscle, and uterus. The high NOMAC
concentration appeared in hypothalamus, pituitary, and
brain at 2 h, which indicated that NOMAC can transfer
across the blood–brain barrier (BBB) easily. In addition,
high levels of NOMAC were observed in the organs
including ovary, hypothalamus, and pituitary, which is
consistent with the distribution to receptors in target tissues
(Bazin et al. 1987; Botella et al. 1986, 1988; Couzinet et al.
1999; Duc et al. 1990).
The concentrations of NOMAC in the urine were ana-
lyzed till their concentrations decreased below HPLC
detection limit. About 0.08 % cumulative amount of
NOMAC was eliminated via biliary excretion within 48 h;
the excretion was projected to keep active after 48 h
according to the slope of the cumulative excretion curve at
48 h, whereas little amount of NOMAC was found in feces
after 48 h, and negligible NOMAC excretion was observed
in urine after 24 h. The polar nature of NOMAC with good
liposolubility prevents drug excretion through the kidney.
These findings are consistent with the previous report that
compounds whose molecular weight ranged between 150
and 700 demonstrated an increase in the proportion of
compounds excreted in the bile versus urine when the
molecular weight increased (Calabrese 1983). However,
the enterohepatic circulation of NOMAC did not signifi-
cantly change tmax because (1) only small portion (*15 %)
of NOMAC in the bloodstream undergoes enterohepatic
Table 3 The structures of possible metabolites of NOMAC observed
in rat plasma
Metabolites no# Metabolite structure
Metabolite #1
Metabolite #2
Metabolite #3
Metabolite #4
Metabolite #5
Nomegestrol (minor)
Fig. 5 Cumulative excretion of NOMAC in fences, urine, and bile
following a single oral dose of 20 mg/kg. Feces and urine samples
were collected at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 h and bile samples were
collected at 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, and 48 h. Values are presented as
mean ? SD (urine and bile) or mean ± SD (feces)
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet
circulation; (2) the excretion rates of NOMAC in the bile
decreased after 2 h, which can be observed by the slopes of
the biliary cumulative excretion curve in Fig. 5. The
excretion of intact NOMAC in rat was detected only at low
concentrations in feces, urine, and bile, similar to that
observed in monkeys and humans (Merk Sharp and Dohme
(Australia) Pty Limited 2011; Gerrits et al. 2013).
NOMAC is metabolized primarily by hepatic CYP3A4
and CYP3A5, and a possible contributory role by
CYP2C19 and CYP2C8 (Yang and Plosker 2012).
NOMAC is metabolized into several hydroxylated metab-
olites and subsequently conjugated with glucuronide or
sulfate (Lello 2010), which accounts for only 1.08 or\1 %
of intact NOMAC being detected in feces, urine or bile
samples of rats. All metabolites of NOMAC had little or no
effects on progesterone receptor activity (Lello 2010). The
possible structures of NOMAC metabolites in rats were
shown in Table 3 (Merk Sharp and Dohme (Australia) Pty
Limited 2011).
5 Conclusions
NOMAC was fast absorbed, widely distributed throughout
tissues, eliminated in female rats via both fecal and renal
routes, and has a long terminal half-life. The results can be
useful for drug formulation development and pharmaco-
kinetic studies in humans.
Acknowledgments The authors would like to thank Gengdi You
and Rongfa Lu for excellent technical support. This work was
financially supported by Shanghai Modern Biology and Drug Industry
Development Foundation (No. 955419004).
Conflict of interest The authors report no conflict of interest. The
authors are responsible for the content and writing of the paper.
References
Alsina JC (2010) After 50 years of ethinylestradiol, another oestrogen
in combined oral contraceptives. Eur J Contracept Reprod Health
Care 15:1–3
Bazin B, Thevenot R, Bursaux C, Paris J (1987) Effect of nomegestrol
acetate, a new 19-nor-progesterone derivative, on pituitary-
ovarian function in women. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 94:1199–1204
Botella J, Porthe-Nibelle J, Paris J, Lahlou B (1986) Interaction of
new 19-nor progesterone derivatives with progestagen,
mineralocorticoid and glucocorticoid cytosolic receptors. J Phar-
macol 17:699–706
Botella J, Paris J, Duc I, Lahlou B (1988) Nomegestrol acetate
binding to cytosolic progesterone receptor in human endome-
trium. Med Sci Res 16:299–300
Calabrese EJ (1983) Principles of Animal Extrapolation. Wiley, New
York
Couzinet B, Young J, Kujas M, Meduri G, Brailly S, Thomas JL,
Chanson P, Schaison G (1999) Theantigonadotropic activity of a
19-nor-progesterone derivative is exerted both at the hypotha-
lamic and pituitary levels in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab
84:4191–4196
Duc I, Botella J, Gillet JY, Duforestel T, Paris J (1990) Nomegestrol
acetate binding to human breast tissue. Med Sci Res 18:57–58
Ezan E, Benech H, Bucourt R, Ardouin T, Tchernatinsky C, Thomas
JL, Paris J, Grognet JM (1993) Enzyme immunoassay for
nomegestrol acetate in human plasma. J Steroid Biochem Mol
Biol 46:507–514
Gerrits MG, Schnabel PG, Post TM, Peeters PA (2013) Pharmaco-
kinetic profile of nomegestrol acetate and 17b-estradiol after
multiple and single dosing in healthy women. Contraception
87:193–200
Gibaldi M, Perrier D (1982) Pharmacokinetics. Marcel Dekker, New
York
Huang Q, Cao L, Gu Z (2000) RP-HPLC determination of nomeges-
trol acetate in plasma of rabbit. Chin J Pharm Anal 20:379–380
Huang Q, Chen X, Zhu Y, Cao L (2014) Development and validation
of an HPLC method for the quantitation of nomegestrol acetate
in biological matrices of rats. Biomed Chromatogr (Submitted)
Jamin C (1992) Female contraception by a normal dose progestogen
after 40 years of age. Possible association of nomegestrol-17-
beta-estradiol acetate by percutaneous route. Rev Fr Gynecol
Obstet 87:370–376
Lello S (2010) Nomegestrol acetate: pharmacology, safety profile and
therapeutic efficacy. Drugs 70:541–559
Merk Sharp and Dohme (Australia) Pty Limited (2011) Australian
public assessment report for nomegestrol acetate/oestradiol.
Health safety regulation http://www.tga.gov.au/pdf/auspar/
auspar-zoely.pdf. Accessed 13 April 2014
Miyake T, Rooks WHII (1966) The relation between the structure and
physiological activity of progestational steroids. In: Dorfman RI
(ed) Methods in hormone research, 5th edn. Academic, New
York, pp 59–145
Ruan X, Seeger H, Mueck AO (2012) The pharmacology of
nomegestrol acetate. Maturitas 71:345–353
Shields-Botella J, Duc I, Duranti E, Puccio F, Bonnet P, Delansorne
R, Paris J (2003) An overview of nomegestrol acetate selective
receptor binding and lack of estrogenic action on hormone-
dependent cancer cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 87:111–122
Thevenot R (1984) Nomegestrol acetate. Drugs Future 9:657–659
van Diepen HA (2012) Preclinical pharmacological profile of
nomegestrol acetate, a synthetic 19-nor-progesterone derivative.
Reprod Biol Endocrinol 8:10–85
Yang LP, Plosker GL (2012) Nomegestrol acetate/estradiol: in oral
contraception. Drugs 72:1917–1928
Yi Z (1992) PK-GRAPH software to calculate pharmacokinetic
parameters. Acta Univ Med Second Shanghai 12:272–274
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet