phase-resolving wave runup for storm inundation assessment · •runup along one transect •60 m...

18
Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment Jane Smith, Andrew Kennedy, Alexandros Taflanidis, Joannes Westerink, Kwok Fai Cheung, Seizo Tanaka, Aina Ota, Madeleine Hamman, Masashi Minamide, and Michael Hartman

Upload: others

Post on 09-May-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment

Jane Smith, Andrew Kennedy, Alexandros Taflanidis, Joannes Westerink, Kwok Fai Cheung, Seizo Tanaka,

Aina Ota, Madeleine Hamman, Masashi Minamide, and Michael Hartman

Page 2: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Motivation

Hurricane Iniki (1992) debris line is much further inland and higher elevation (~7m) than the 2-3 m surge.

Page 3: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Motivation

On steep coastlines, particularly with little or no continental shelf, wave runup can dominate storm inundation

Parameterized runup predictions exist for beaches and breakwaters, but these are not general enough for arbitrary topographies

Page 4: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Runup Modeling Approach

•Phase-resolving Boussinesq model•Nonlinear processes on arbitrary topographies, including runup•Applied on 1D transects to develop lookup table of response

Page 5: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Conclusions

One-dimensional Boussinesq computations give reasonable estimates of runup over complex topographies

Limited by one dimensionality, bare earth assumption

Results are conservative, especially in built up areas

Runup can dominate over surge on steep topographies

When combined with large scale wave/water level simulations, can give estimates of worst case inundations

Significant areas of Honolulu would be underwater with a direct hurricane strike

Page 6: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Outline

One-dimensional Boussinesq Modeling for Hawaiian Islands

Runup for a single wave height/water level

Storm matrix to cover range of possible conditions

Hurricane Iniki runup comparisons

Maximum Potential Runup for Oahu

Wave+Surge+Runup inundation for suite of storms, separated by central pressure

Page 7: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Runup Computations

As part of SWIMS project, compute runup along one- dimensional transects for the major Hawaiian Islands

Wave conditions, water levels at transect starting points determined from range of wave heights/water levels from large- scale SWAN+ADCIRC simulations

Use Bouss1D model (Nwogu and Demirbilek)

On each transect, run 169 combinations of waves/water levels, find max runup from each

300-800 transects for each island

Hundreds of thousands of total runs

Would like to perform 3D inundation, but computing power is not sufficient for large number of runs

Page 8: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Example Runup Computation

Time(s)

Time(s)

Time(s)

Ele

v(m

)D

ist (

m)

Inpu

t Ele

v(m

)

•Runup along one transect•60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup•Incident waves Hs ~ 8.8 m•Still water level ~ 1.4 m

•Runup elevation and inundation are both wave group dominated•Up to 6 m maximum runup•Up to 130 m max inland penetration

•169 runs for this transect covering envelope of wave heights, water levels

Page 9: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Matrix of Runup from 13 Wave Heights×13 Water Levels

•Lines represent different initial water levels

•Wave height/water level matrix covers range of conditions

•Interpolate within this range

Page 10: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Hurricane Iniki Runup Comparisons on Kauai

Iniki track

Subregions for runup comparison

Page 11: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

1 km

*

Debris LineComputed Surge Line

Computed Runup

Hurricane Iniki Runup

•Iniki is worst hurricane to hit Hawaiian Islands in the past century•Runup comparisons give reasonable results for most cases•Computed runup is much more important than computed surge

Poipu

Page 12: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Iniki Runup Continued1 km

1 kmKekaha

Waimea

Page 13: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Maximum Potential Runup

Hundreds of large scale SWAN+ADCIRC runs computed for different scenarios

Use Boussinesq runup model to compute inundation for each run in Oahu and Kauai

Group all storms by central pressure, find maximum runup/surge inundations

Can be used to estimate worst case scenario for a given storm strength

Page 14: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Oahu Potential Inundation

Subregions shown

Page 15: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Waikiki/Diamond Head Potential Inundation

***

940mb Surge

955mb Surge

970mb Surge

940mb Runup

955mb Runup

970mb Runup

City Hall

Waikiki

Diamond Head

•Still water surge in particular is important in this region•Low ground elevations mean that potential inundation is large•Waikiki back side inundation through Ala Wai Canal

1 km

Page 16: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Pearl Harbor/Honolulu Potential Inundation

***

940mb Surge

955mb Surge

970mb Surge

940mb Runup

955mb Runup

970mb RunupHNL Airport

Hickham AFB

Pearl Harbor

Industrial Area

•Still water surge is important •Runup significant along exposed coastlines•Airport would experience some inundation

1 km

Page 17: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Southwest Oahu Potential Inundation

***

940mb Surge

955mb Surge

970mb Surge

940mb Runup

955mb Runup

970mb Runup

Kahe Power Plant

Kapolei Refinery

Ewa Beach

•Runup significant along exposed coast•Hundreds of meters inland•Much is industrial land•Ewa Beach would have inundation

1 km

Page 18: Phase-Resolving Wave Runup for Storm Inundation Assessment · •Runup along one transect •60 m depth to breaking on shallow reef, then runup •Incident waves H s ~ 8.8 m •Still

Conclusions

One-dimensional Boussinesq computations give reasonable estimates of runup over complex topographies

Limited by one dimensionality, bare earth assumption

Results are conservative, especially in built up areas

Runup can dominate over surge on steep topographies

When combined with large scale wave/water level simulations, can give estimates of worst case inundations

Significant areas of Honolulu would be underwater with a direct hurricane strike