phd seminar iim-a_2016

17
Where do Good Research Ideas Come From? PhD seminar, IIM-A, 2016 Lilac Nachum Baruch College, City University New York

Upload: lilac-nachum

Post on 26-Jan-2017

79 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Where do Good Research Ideas Come From?

PhD seminar, IIM-A, 2016

Lilac NachumBaruch College, City University New York

Page 2: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

A Theory of the Interesting:Interesting Defined

• In ‘wide circulation’

Page 3: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

A Theory of the Interesting: What is Interesting?

Theoretically?• Not routine (not taken-for-

granted)• Not trivial• Not obvious.

Practically?• Has utility• Theory utility?• Explains the world, has

practical consequences:• Answers for the ‘so

what?’ ‘Why should we care?’ ‘What is it good for?’ questions.

Page 4: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

What is Interesting?Types of Interesting (index)

• Characterization of a single phenomenon– Heterogeneity – elements comprising and

their interrelationships– Generalization – across contexts and over

time (stability)• Relationships among multiple phenomena

– Co-existence– Co-variations.

Page 5: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

So What is Interesting?Some examples

• Negation of an accepted wisdom• Areas in which there is no consensus• Assumptions that are sensitive to context, to

time – Negation/re-examination of the ‘traditional view’.

Page 6: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Crossing Boundaries:The Medici Effect

• Moving (trivial) knowledge across disciplinary boundaries

• The Intersection as a place of innovation, creativity in the ideas space

• Connect separated worlds in a meaningful way

• The challenge; the rewards.

Page 7: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

The Theory of the Interesting meets the Medici Effect?

• ‘Propositions are interesting or uninteresting only in relation to the assumption-ground of some audience. …assumption about the topic is conditioned by their [the audience] intellectual specialty or discipline.’ Davis, p. 328-9

• The Medici Effect – the same idea; different audiences.

Page 8: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Hymer Theory of International Business (1960/1976)

• International business theory before Hymer• Hymer contribution:• Search for higher return on intangible assets

whose return is higher via investment than export trade versus FDI

• Better utilization of intangible assets across borders internally [within the firm] than via the market FDI versus licensing.

Page 9: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Hymer theory of International Business to the Test

The ‘test of the interesting’: ‘wide circulation’• Theoretically:• Assumptions challenged/negated?• Cross-border activity as a financial transaction• Homogenous firms• Activities via the market or the firm• Practically – what is it good for • Theories combined?• Industrial organization, Coase theory of the firm.

Page 10: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

ILLUSTRATION:MNE Location Choice

Page 11: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

The Study of Strategic Choices

OutcomeChoiceDrivers of Choice

Descriptive Normative

Single choice

vs overall

Level of

choice

Level of Analyses

Page 12: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

The Study of MNEs’ Location Choices

OutcomeChoiceDrivers

of Choice:Exogenous

Endogenous

Descriptive

Normative

Level of AnalysesSingle choice

vs overall

Level of

choice

Page 13: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

My Contributions

OutcomeChoice

Drivers of

Choice:Exogenous

Endogenous

DescriptiveNormative

Level of Analyses

Single choice

vs overall

Level of

choice

Location as a competitive advantage;

Location choice and

performance [GSJ]

Location choice as a

portfolio [JIBS]

Page 14: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Unit of Analysis:Location Choice within a Portfolio• The MNE as a multi-unit organization (a

portfolio) – Value creation by MNEs

• The state of theory and research– The MNE as a whole– Individual units

• Theoretical underpinning– Finance theory– Modular theory.

Page 15: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Location Choice and Performance

• Performance consequences of different location choices (portfolios)

• Performance consequences: – sum of individual choices + the interactions – the whole not the sum of the part

• Theoretical foundations: • Modularity and organization architecture

theories.

Page 16: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Location as a Competitive Advantage• Creating Firm-specific value from location

resources• Location resources – not exclusive to firms

– available on the market• Not possession but modification

– Not ownership but management • C.K.Prahalad and M.S. Krishnan. 2008. The New Age of Innovation.

• Firms not identical in the ability to turn location resources into competitive advantages

• Theoretical underpinning: RBV, Strategic management (Porter).

Page 17: PhD seminar IIM-A_2016

Revised theory of MNE location choice to the test: Your turn

Interesting?• Statistically?• Practically?

Theories combined?