philippines: meeting infrastructure challenges
DESCRIPTION
Philippines: Meeting Infrastructure Challenges. The World Bank. Infrastructure in the Philippines. A mixed picture of important achievements And remaining weaknesses. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Philippines: Meeting Philippines: Meeting Infrastructure Infrastructure ChallengesChallenges
The World BankThe World Bank
Infrastructure in the Infrastructure in the PhilippinesPhilippines
A mixed picture of important A mixed picture of important
achievementsachievements
And remaining weaknessesAnd remaining weaknesses
Overall access to water supply and Overall access to water supply and sanitation, telephones, and electricity sanitation, telephones, and electricity are relatively high compared with other are relatively high compared with other developing Asian countriesdeveloping Asian countries
CountryElectrifi-cation
rates (%)
Quality of electric supply
(Scale 1–7)
Mainlines per 100 peoplec
Mobile sub-scribers per 100 peoplec
Access to improved
sanitation (%)
Access to improved water (%)
2000 2003/04 2003 2003 2002 2002
China 98 4.2 20.9 21.48 44 77Malaysia 96 5.9 18.16 44.2 — —Mongolia 90 — 5.62 12.98 59 62Thailand 82 5.3 10.49 39.42 99 85Philippines 80 3.7 4.12 26.95 73 85Vietnam 75 3.4 5.41 3.37 41 73Sri Lanka 62 3.2 4.9 7.27 91 78Indonesia 53 3.6 3.94 8.74 52 78India 43 3 4.63 2.47 30 86Rank 5 of 9 5 of 8 8 of 9 3 of 9 3 of 8 2 of 8
Power Telecoms Water & sanitation
Total road network length compares Total road network length compares favorably with neighboring countriesfavorably with neighboring countries
1,000 vehicles (4-wheel)
1,000 population
sq. km of land area
Indonesia 310,000 65.8 1.4 0.16
Thailand 209,800 42 3.3 0.41
Vietnam 204,318 302 2.5 0.62
Philippines 202,083 91.3 2.4 0.67
Cambodia 38,257 372 2.7 0.21
Malaysia 72,000 19.4 2.8 0.22
Ranking 3 of 6 5 of 6 1 of 6
Country
Total road length (km)
Road density: length in km per
Sources: Philippine data from JICA-DPWH. 2003. “Roads in the Philippines.” Manila; other countries from the ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2004 and the ASEAN Transport and Communication Sectoral Report 1999. ASEAN, Jakarta.
Major reform measures in the Major reform measures in the power, water, transport, and power, water, transport, and telecoms sector have already been telecoms sector have already been initiatedinitiated Power: Power:
– Critical tariff adjustments implementedCritical tariff adjustments implemented– Ongoing market restructuring and privatization Ongoing market restructuring and privatization
Water Supply and Sanitation: Water Supply and Sanitation: – Landmark Manila water concessionLandmark Manila water concession– EO279 for water sector financing reform EO279 for water sector financing reform
Road: Road: – Special Road Fund establishedSpecial Road Fund established– DPWH reform proposals DPWH reform proposals
Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure: Private Sector Participation in Infrastructure: – BOT Law (1990, amended 1994)BOT Law (1990, amended 1994)– Public broadly supportive of private sector participationPublic broadly supportive of private sector participation
But overall state of infrastructure in the But overall state of infrastructure in the country has not kept up with rapid country has not kept up with rapid population growth and urbanizationpopulation growth and urbanization
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
80,000
90,000
100,000
19
50
19
55
19
60
19
65
19
70
19
75
19
80
19
85
19
90
19
95
20
00
20
05
20
10
20
15
20
20
20
25
20
30
020
4060
80
Percen
tT
ho
usa
nd
s
% of population residing in urban areas
% of population residing in Metro Manila
Rural
Urban
Low quality of services has emerged as a Low quality of services has emerged as a key impediment to the economic key impediment to the economic competitivenesscompetitiveness
Infrastructure Ranking in the Global Competitiveness Report
Source: World Economic Forum, “The Global Competitiveness Report, 2003-2004”Legend: 1=poorly developed and inefficient, 7= among the best in the world
Overall Overall InfraInfra
RailroaRailroadd
PortPort AirAir ElectricitElectricityy
TelephonTelephonee
ChinaChina 3.53.5 3.73.7 3.73.7 3.93.9 4.24.2 5.45.4
IndiaIndia 2.92.9 4.74.7 3.23.2 4.84.8 3.03.0 6.06.0
IndonesiaIndonesia 3.73.7 3.23.2 3.73.7 4.14.1 3.63.6 3.93.9
KoreaKorea 5.25.2 5.45.4 5.35.3 5.75.7 6.16.1 6.56.5
MalaysiaMalaysia 6.16.1 4.94.9 6.16.1 6.26.2 5.95.9 6.06.0
PhilippinPhilippineses
2.32.3 1.51.5 2.42.4 3.93.9 3.63.6 4.84.8
ThailandThailand 4.94.9 3.73.7 4.54.5 5.65.6 5.35.3 6.16.1
VietnamVietnam 2.72.7 2.82.8 3.13.1 3.93.9 3.43.4 4.94.9
RankingRanking 8 out of 8 out of 88
8 out of 8 out of 88
8 out of 8 out of 88
6 out of 6 out of 88
5 out of 5 out of 88
7 out of 7 out of 88
Service levels for the poor are much Service levels for the poor are much lower than the averagelower than the average
0
20
40
60
80
100
Poorest Second Middle Fourth Richest
Electricity Telephone Piped drinking water Own flush toilet
Per
cen
t o
f p
op
ula
tio
n
Quintile
Access to basic infrastructure
Need to increase infrastructure spending Need to increase infrastructure spending from less than 3% of GDP to at least 5%, from less than 3% of GDP to at least 5%, and increase the efficiency of and increase the efficiency of infrastructure spending in the meantimeinfrastructure spending in the meantime
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Philippines Indonesia Albania Russia Cambodia Kazakhstan China
Per
cen
t
Public
Private
No breakdown
Note: No breakdown for China, figures are 1991-2000 average. Philippines and Indonesia (2002 figures) , Albania and Russia (2000) and Cambodia (2001).Sources: World Bank Privte Participation in Infrastructure Database, World Bank Public Expenditure Reports, China Statistical yearbook (various years).
0
2
4
6
8
10
1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001
Total
Private
Public
““Boom-Bust” Infrastructure CycleBoom-Bust” Infrastructure Cycle Infrastructure Investments as a share of Infrastructure Investments as a share of GDP, GDP, 1985-20021985-2002
Capital outlays only.
Sources: Department of Budget and Management; Department of Finance; Commission on Audit; Maynilad Water Services, Inc.; Manila Water Corporation, Inc.; Optel Ltd.; and World Bank.
Per
cen
t
The Way Forward – The Way Forward – Four PrioritiesFour Priorities A rigorous and sustained fiscal reform A rigorous and sustained fiscal reform
programprogram Continued specific reforms in key sectors – Continued specific reforms in key sectors –
particularly power, road and waterparticularly power, road and water Improved central oversight of the planning Improved central oversight of the planning
and coordination of investmentsand coordination of investments A few focused investments in the short A few focused investments in the short
term through public- private partnershipterm through public- private partnership
Implementing Specific Implementing Specific Reforms in Key SectorsReforms in Key Sectors
Basic framework in place – thus Basic framework in place – thus huge returns to some specific huge returns to some specific measures measures
Cross cutting reform issue is to Cross cutting reform issue is to achieve cost recoveryachieve cost recovery
Improving Oversight of Improving Oversight of Investment Planning and Investment Planning and CoordinationCoordination Focus of oversight Focus of oversight
responsibilities to responsibilities to shift from detailed shift from detailed project-level project-level approval process approval process to a broader and to a broader and more forward-more forward-looking rolelooking role
Concerns about Concerns about efficiency and efficiency and transparency of transparency of unsolicited bidsunsolicited bids
Infrastructure Infrastructure Investment as a share Investment as a share of GDP, 1985-2002of GDP, 1985-2002
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
19
85
19
87
19
89
19
91
19
93
19
95
19
97
19
99
20
01
Focus on a Few Investments that Focus on a Few Investments that Address Infrastructure Address Infrastructure BottlenecksBottlenecksunder Public Private Partnershipunder Public Private Partnership
MTPDP has highlighted the prioritiesMTPDP has highlighted the priorities– Decongesting Metro ManilaDecongesting Metro Manila– Developing Subic Clark areasDeveloping Subic Clark areas
Undertake these investments in close Undertake these investments in close partnerships with the private sectorpartnerships with the private sector
New projects should be tendered competitively New projects should be tendered competitively and transparently to attract private sectorand transparently to attract private sector– Good project preparation is key to be able to conduct Good project preparation is key to be able to conduct
competitive biddingcompetitive bidding– Proper management of subsidies: cash subsidies and Proper management of subsidies: cash subsidies and
guaranteesguarantees
Summary of MessagesSummary of Messages
Infrastructure is key element of the Philippine Infrastructure is key element of the Philippine Development Agenda Development Agenda
Many elements of good infrastructure policy Many elements of good infrastructure policy framework are already in placeframework are already in place
Some key measures are critical to revive Some key measures are critical to revive infrastructure investmentsinfrastructure investments– Fiscal stabilizationFiscal stabilization– Specific sector reforms, including cost Specific sector reforms, including cost
recovery policyrecovery policy– Improving planning and coordinationImproving planning and coordination– Well-designed competitive tendering to Well-designed competitive tendering to
maximizing the benefits of private sector maximizing the benefits of private sector participationparticipation