physical criteria’s to distinguish a tsunami deposit form a storm deposit

17
Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit. . By, Frango C.Johnson Research Scholar Department of Civil Engineering IIT Kanpur, U.P (India)

Upload: afram

Post on 23-Feb-2016

60 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit. . . By , Frango C.Johnson Research Scholar Department of Civil Engineering IIT Kanpur, U.P (India). Different characteristics found in tsunami and storm deposits, described in the literature. Evidence. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm

deposit..

By,Frango C.JohnsonResearch Scholar

Department of Civil EngineeringIIT Kanpur, U.P (India)

Page 2: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

TSUNAMI DEPOSITS STORM DEPOSITS

Different characteristics found in tsunami and storm deposits, described in the literature

EVIDENCE

Morphological

•Wash-over fans behind breached barriersStratigraphic

al

•Fines inland•Erosional basal contact•Large inland extent

•Thins inland

•Fines inland•Erosional basal contact•Relative smaller inland extent

•Thins inland and becomes discontinuous

•Wash-over fans behind breached barriers

Page 3: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

TSUNAMI DEPOSITS STORM DEPOSITSEVIDENCE

Sedimentological

•Intraclasts from underlying material

• Not found

•Loading structures at base

• Not found

•Bi-directional imbrications

•Unidirectional imbrications

•Poorly sorted (particle size ranging from mud to boulders)

•Relatively better sorted

•Sedimentary structures very seldom found

•Sedimentary structures more common

Page 4: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

TSUNAMI DEPOSITS STORM DEPOSITSEVIDENCE

Geochemical

Palaeontological

•Plant fragments•Shell rich units•Rafting light material•Buried plants at base

•Plant fragments•Shell rich units•Not found•Buried plants at base

•Increase in geochemical elements indicating marine origin

•No information found, but similar signature is expected because of marine origin

•Marine fossils: Mixture of marine and fresh water fossils

•Relative well/poorly preserved fossils

•Marine fossils: Increased diversity (mixture marine and brackish fossils)•Relative well/poorly preserved fossils

Mineralogical •Significant Heavy mineral concentration

•Not found

Page 5: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Twig orientation

Aerial photograph of tsunami deposit distribution and flow directions at Arop transect, Papua New Guinea. From Gelfenbaum and Jaffe (2003)

Page 6: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Tsunami deposit characteristics

By : Morton et al. (2007)

Page 7: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Typical Characteristics of tsunami deposits: Tsunami deposits produced as a result of onshore

run-up and backwash can be very distinctive (Nanayama et al., 2000; Dawson and Shi, 2000).

Tsunamis comprised both landward- and seaward-directed layers

Typhoon-related storm deposits showing fore set bedding

Landward of these continuous tapering sediment wedges there may be discontinuous lenses of tsunami deposited sediment (Dawson, 1994).

Page 8: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Large coral-reef fragments deposited on Pakarang Beach, near Khao Lak, Thailand, by the 26 December 2004 tsunami. The high energies needed to remove these boulders may ensure they have a higher preservation potential than other tsunami-related onshore sediments.

Page 9: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Tsunami sediment-Macro- and micro fauna. The macro-faunal content can range from fish remains to a wide range of shell debris.

Presence of benthic foraminifera ought to be an important criterion that can be used to identify past tsunami deposits.

Nanayama and Shigeno (2006) report deep water marine benthic foraminifera within the 1993 Hokkaido tsunamis, indicating that the tsunami was picking up foraminifera tests on the seabed

depths of between 45 and 90 m (and implying seabed current velocities of 0.2–0.5 m/s).

Page 10: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit
Page 11: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit
Page 12: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit
Page 13: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Sandy storm depositsSandy storm deposits tend to be >30 cm

thick, generally extend <300 m from the beach

They typically are composed of numerous sub-horizontal planar laminas

Multiple lamina sets that are normally or inversely graded.

They do not contain internal mud laminas and rarely contain mud intra- clasts.

Page 14: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Proximal overwash deposits of Hurricane Carla on (A) Bolivar Peninsula, Texas and (B) Matagorda Peninsula, Texas. Deposits wereapproximately 130 and 60 cm thick, respectively, and consisted of poorly sorted sand and shell. Abrupt basal contacts overlie well-sorted sand ofolder barrier-island deposits.

By : Morton et al. (2007)

Page 15: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Hurricane deposits and sediment texture exposed in the ocean side

By : Morton et al. (2007)

Page 16: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Conclusion The above mentioned physical

criteria’s are the preliminary clues; and it can be very useful for the determination between tsunami deposits from the storm deposits.

Application of these distinguishing characteristics depends on their preservation potential and any deposit modifications that accompany burial.

Page 17: Physical criteria’s to distinguish a Tsunami deposit form a Storm deposit

Thank you