physical modelling of instruments

34
Physical Modelling of Physical Modelling of Instruments Instruments Activities in ESO’s Instrumentation Division Florian Kerber, Paul Bristow

Upload: lida

Post on 09-Jan-2016

134 views

Category:

Documents


8 download

DESCRIPTION

Physical Modelling of Instruments. Activities in ESO’s Instrumentation Division. Florian Kerber, Paul Bristow. Our Partners. INS, TEC, DMD, LPO, … Instrument Teams (CRIRES, X-shooter …) Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility (ST-ECF) M.R. Rosa Atomic Spectroscopy Group (NIST) - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Physical Modelling of Instruments

Physical Modelling of InstrumentsPhysical Modelling of Instruments

Activities in ESO’s Instrumentation Division

Florian Kerber, Paul Bristow

Page 2: Physical Modelling of Instruments

2

Our PartnersOur Partners

INS, TEC, DMD, LPO, … Instrument Teams (CRIRES, X-shooter …) Space Telescope European Coordinating Facility

(ST-ECF)– M.R. Rosa

Atomic Spectroscopy Group (NIST)– J. Reader, G. Nave, C.J. Sansonetti

CHARMS (NASA, Goddard SFC)– D.B. Leviton, B.J. Frey

Page 3: Physical Modelling of Instruments

3

OutlineOutline

Instrument Modelling - Concept Instrument Modelling - Basics Instrument Modelling - Details Input for the Model Discussion

Page 4: Physical Modelling of Instruments

4

Building & Operating an InstrumentBuilding & Operating an Instrument

Science Requirements Optical Design (code V, Zemax) Engineering Expertise Testing and Commissioning

Operation and Data Flow Calibration of Instrument Scientific Data and Archive

Page 5: Physical Modelling of Instruments

5

From Concept to ApplicationFrom Concept to Application

M. Rosa: Predictive calibration strategies: The FOS as a case study (1995)

P. Ballester, M. Rosa: Modeling echelle spectrographs (A&AS 126, 563, 1997)

P. Ballester, M. Rosa: Instrument Modelling in Observational Astronomy (ADASS XIII, 2004)

Bristow, Kerber, Rosa: four papers in HST Calibration Workshop, 2006

UVES, SINFONI, FOS, STIS, VLTI, ETC

Page 6: Physical Modelling of Instruments

6

Physical ModelPhysical Model

Optical Model (Ray trace)

High quality Input Data

Simulated Data Close loop between Model and Observations

Optimizer Tool (Simulated Annealing)

Page 7: Physical Modelling of Instruments

7

STIS-CE Lamp Project STIS-CE Lamp Project

Pt-Ne atlas, Reader et al. (1990) done for GHRS

STIS uses Pt/Cr-Ne lamp Impact of the Cr lines

strongest in the NUV List of > 5000 lines accurate to < 1/1000 nm

Echelle, c 251.3 nm

# of lines: Pt-Ne 258 # of lines: Pt-Ne 258 vs Pt/Cr-Ne 1612

Page 8: Physical Modelling of Instruments

8

STISSTIS

Page 9: Physical Modelling of Instruments

9Standard: =(3.3 ± 1.9) STIS Model: =(0.6 ± 1.7)

STIS Science Demo Case: Result STIS Science Demo Case: Result

1 pixel

10-4 nm

Page 10: Physical Modelling of Instruments

10

Traditional Wavelength CalibrationTraditional Wavelength Calibration

Data collected for known wavelength source (lamp or sky):– Match observed features to wavelengths of

known features– Fit detector location against wavelength =>

polynomial dispersion solution

Page 11: Physical Modelling of Instruments

11

Physical Model ApproachPhysical Model Approach

Essentially same input as the polynomial:– x,y location on detector

– Entrance slit position (ps) & wavelength ()

Require that the model maps:

for all observed features.

ps,λ a x,y

Page 12: Physical Modelling of Instruments

12

CRIRESCRIRES

950 - 5000 nm Resolution / 100,000 ZnSe pre-disperser prism Echelle 31.6 lines/mm 4 x Aladdin III 1k x1k

InSb array Commissioning June 06

Page 13: Physical Modelling of Instruments

13

Model KernelModel Kernel

Page 14: Physical Modelling of Instruments

14

Model KernelModel Kernel

Speed– Streamlined (simplistic) description– Fast - suitable for multiple realisations

Spectrograph (CRIRES - cold part only)– Tips and tilts of principal components– Dispersive behaviour of prism and grating– Detector layout

This is not a full optical model

Page 15: Physical Modelling of Instruments

15

Operating Modes (foreseen)Operating Modes (foreseen)

1. General optimisation (calibration scientist, offline)

2. Grating & prism optimisation (automatic)

3. Data reduction (pipeline)

4. Data simulation (interactive, offline)

Page 16: Physical Modelling of Instruments

16

Page 17: Physical Modelling of Instruments

17

Operating Modes (foreseen)Operating Modes (foreseen)

1. General optimisation (calibration scientist, offline)

2. Grating & prism optimisation (automatic)

3. Data reduction (pipeline)

4. Data simulation (interactive, offline)

Page 18: Physical Modelling of Instruments

18

Operating Modes (foreseen)Operating Modes (foreseen)

1. General optimisation (calibration scientist, offline)

2. Grating & prism optimisation (automatic)

3. Data reduction (pipeline)

4. Data simulation (interactive, offline)

Page 19: Physical Modelling of Instruments

19

Operating Modes (foreseen)Operating Modes (foreseen)

1. General optimisation (calibration scientist, offline)

2. Grating & prism optimisation (automatic)

3. Data reduction (pipeline)

4. Data simulation (interactive, offline)

Page 20: Physical Modelling of Instruments

20

Page 21: Physical Modelling of Instruments

21

Simulated Stellar SpectrumSimulated Stellar Spectrum

Page 22: Physical Modelling of Instruments

22

Page 23: Physical Modelling of Instruments

23

Optimisation StrategyOptimisation Strategy

Take limits from design and construction One order/mode - rich spectra

– Optimise detector layout

Multiple order/modes (detector layout fixed)– Optimise all except prism/grating

All order/modes (all parameters fixed except prism/grating)– Optimise prism/grating settings for each mode

Page 24: Physical Modelling of Instruments

24

Near IR Wavelength StandardsNear IR Wavelength Standards

1270–1290 nm

Th-Ar

Ne

Kr

Page 25: Physical Modelling of Instruments

25

Th-Ar lamp:Visible and Near IRTh-Ar lamp:Visible and Near IR

Established standard source in Visual– Palmer & Engleman (1983) 278 - 1000 nm– FEROS, FLAMES, HARPS, UVES, Xshooter

Cryogenic High Resolution Echelle Spectrometer (CRIRES) at VLT– 950 - 5000 nm, Resolution ~100,000– Project to establish wavelength standards (NIST)– UV/VIS/IR 2 m Fourier Transform Spectrometer (FTS)

Page 26: Physical Modelling of Instruments

26

Page 27: Physical Modelling of Instruments

27

Measurements with FTS at ESOMeasurements with FTS at ESO

Page 28: Physical Modelling of Instruments

28

Spectrum - Operating CurrentSpectrum - Operating Current

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

2 6 10 14 18 22

Lamp operating current [mA]

Intensity [normalised to 10 mA]

ArgonThorium

Page 29: Physical Modelling of Instruments

29

Th-Ar in the near IR: SummaryTh-Ar in the near IR: Summary

• > 2000 lines as wavelength standards in the range 900 - 4500 nm

• insight into the properties of Th-Ar lamps, variation of the spectral output/continuum as a function of current

• Th-Ar hollow cathode lamps - a standard source for wavelength calibration for near IR astronomy

Page 30: Physical Modelling of Instruments

30

CRIRES pre-disperser prism - ZnSeCRIRES pre-disperser prism - ZnSe

n(,T)from CHARMS, (GSFC, NASA)

Leviton & Frey, 2004

Page 31: Physical Modelling of Instruments

31Wavelength [nm]1124 1138

Measured line shifts Physical Model

– Th-Ar line list– n(,T) & dn/dT of

ZnSe

ZnSe Prism: Temperature 73 - 77 KZnSe Prism: Temperature 73 - 77 K

Page 32: Physical Modelling of Instruments

32

Location of Th-Ar lines - TemperatureLocation of Th-Ar lines - Temperature

0

0,5

1

1,5

2

2,5

3

3,5

4

4,5

5

72,5 73,5 74,5 75,5 76,5 77,5 78,5

Temperature [K]

Shift [pixel]

1124 nm1138 nm1124 nm pred1138 nm pred

Page 33: Physical Modelling of Instruments

33

Conclusions - Physical ModelConclusions - Physical Model

Preserve know how about instrument Replace empirical wavelength calibration High quality input data is essential Predictive power Support instrument development

– assess expected performance– reduce risk

Calibration data is still required!

Page 34: Physical Modelling of Instruments

34

Conclusions - Physical ModelConclusions - Physical Model

The resulting calibration is predictive and expected to be more precise

The process of optimising the model is somewhat more complex than fitting a polynomial

Understanding of physical properties and their changes

CRIRES will be the first ESO instrument to utilise this approach to calibration