physician compensation: regulatory and business concerns

21
5/28/2014 1 Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns Kelly S. McIntosh May 29, 2014 Roadmap Laws and Liability Examples and Recent Enforcement Actions/Horror Stories Compensation Models Contract Terms to Consider Additional Considerations for 501(c)(3) Entities

Upload: holland-hart-llp

Post on 09-Apr-2017

458 views

Category:

Health & Medicine


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

1

Physician Compensation:Regulatory and Business Concerns

Kelly S. McIntosh

May 29, 2014

Roadmap

Laws and Liability

Examples and Recent Enforcement Actions/Horror Stories

Compensation Models

Contract Terms to Consider

Additional Considerations for 501(c)(3) Entities

Page 2: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

2

Preliminaries

Presentation will be recorded and available for download at www.hhhealthlawblog.com

Written materials:– PowerPoint slides

– OIG Handout on Stark Law and Anti-Kickback Statute

– CMS Chart Comparing Stark Exceptions

Preliminaries

If you have questions, please submit them using chat line or e-mail me at [email protected]

If you experience technical problems during the program, please contact Luke Kelly at [email protected]

Page 3: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

3

Preliminaries

This program offers an overview of legal issues and considerations

This program does not establish an attorney-client relationship

This program does not constitute the giving of legal advice

Laws and Liability

Anti-Kickback Statute

Stark Law (self-referrals)

Civil Monetary Penalties Law

False Claims Act

Whistleblower/Qui Tam Actions

Remember: State law counterparts!

Fee-Splitting

Page 4: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

4

Laws and Liability

Anti-Kickback Statute– 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b

– Criminal statute

– Cannot knowingly and willingly offer, pay, solicit or receive remuneration to induce referrals for items or services covered by Federal health care programs Unless exception or safe harbor applies

– Penalties

Laws and Liability

Anti-Kickback Statute– “One purpose test” – if one purpose of the remuneration

is to induce referrals, even if other legitimate business purposes apply.

Page 5: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

5

Laws and Liability

Anti-Kickback Statute– Beware how broadly “remuneration” may be considered

Hospital paying staff physicians to attend conferences in their areas of specialty

Hospital offering free training for physician’s office staff in CPT coding or laboratory techniques

– OIG Fraud Alerts contain helpful examples

Laws and Liability

Anti-Kickback Statute

Facility,Physician,

Vendor, Patient, Other

Remuneration

Referrals

Page 6: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

6

Laws and Liability

Stark Law– 42 U.S.C. § 1395nn; 42 C.F.R. § 411.350

– Civil statute – strict liability

– If a “physician” (or immediate family member) has a financial relationship with an entity, the physician may not refer patients to the entity for “designated health services” and the entity may not bill for such services Unless exception applies

– Definition of physician

– Definition of DHS

– Penalties

Laws and Liability

Stark Law

DHS Entity

Physician, or Family Member

Financial Relationship

Referral for DHS

Page 7: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

7

Laws and Liability

Civil Monetary Penalties Law– 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7a

– Prohibits certain conduct including submitting false or fraudulent claims, providing inducements for limiting services, submitting claims for unnecessary services, offering inducements to program beneficiaries and contracting with excluded persons

– Penalties

Laws and Liability

False Claims Act– 18 U.S.C. § 1347

– Cannot knowingly submit a false claim for payment to the government

– Penalties

– AKS violation is an automatic False Claims Act violation

– Qui Tam – private actions

Page 8: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

8

Whistleblowers/Qui Tam

Mechanics of a whistleblower case– Relator files under seal in federal court

– Disclosure of information to Attorney General and local Assistant US Attorney

– Seal at least 60 days; sometimes months or years

– Government decides whether to intervene

Whistleblowers/Qui Tam

Relators are commonly former employees, competitors or others with inside information!

Incentive to report– 15-30% of recovery

– Plus attorney fees and costs

Page 9: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

9

Whistleblowers/Qui Tam

2012 – Record setting year - $6 Billion – 647 qui tam lawsuits filed

– 80% of False Claims Act investigations came from qui tam complaints

Consequences– Fines

Mandatory treble damages for False Claims Act

Mandatory civil penalties ($5,500 to $11,000 per false claim)

– Criminal investigations

– Exclusion from government health care programs

– Corporate integrity agreements

State Laws

“Mini” Stark and Anti-Kickback Statutes– Not necessarily tied to source of payment

Fee-Splitting Prohibitions

Limitations on How Different Providers May Work Together

Penalties

Page 10: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

10

Risks and Horror Stories

In 2012, the OIG reported:– More than $6.9 billion in recovery

– 778 criminal actions

– 367 civil actions

– 3,131 exclusions

2014- over 30 new Corporate Integrity Agreements – so far!

Risks and Horror Stories

Recent DOJ/OIG Settlements – with CIAs– May 28 – Medtronic, Inc. - $9.9 million related to

allegations of kickbacks to physicians

– May 28 – Ashland Hospital Corp/King’s Daughters Medical Center – $40.9 million related kickbacks/prohibited financial relationships with physicians and unnecessary services – also resolved alleged Stark law violations

– http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2014/May/

Page 11: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

11

Risks and Horror Stories

Recent CMS Self-Referral Disclosure Protocol Settlements

– Physician group practice - $13,572

– Nonprofit community hospital - $9,570

– Acute psychiatric hospital - $67,750

– Acute care hospital - $87,110

Exceptions and Safe Harbors

Stark and Anti-Kickback Statutes– If only dealing with the Federal laws, Federal health

care programs must be involved

– Consider state law exceptions

Potential Exceptions– Bona fide employment relationships (Stark/AKS)

– Personal services arrangements (Stark/AKS)

– Physician services (Stark)

– Fair market value (Stark)

– Investment interest in group practice (AKS)

Page 12: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

12

Exceptions and Safe Harbors

Key elements:– Fair market value

– Commercially reasonable

– Not determined based on volume or value of referrals or business generated between the parties

Consider any limitations on how arrangement may be structured (e.g. corporate practice of medicine prohibitions based in state law, etc.)

See OIG Handout and Chart Comparing Stark Exceptions

Employment

Key elements:– Bona fide employment relationship

– Compensation is: Fair market value

Not determined based on volume or value of referrals (but allows productivity for personally-performed services)

Page 13: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

13

Independent Contractor

Personal Services

Key elements:– Written agreement

– Term of at least one year

– Exact schedule of services if less than full-time (AKS)

– Compensation is: Fair market value

Not determined based on volume or value of referrals

More flexibility with employees than independent contractors

Independent Contractor

Fair Market Value Exception (Stark)

Key elements:– Written agreement

– Any specified time frame, but only one arrangement in a one year period

– Compensation is: Fair market value

Not determined based on volume or value of referrals

More flexibility with employees than independent contractors

Page 14: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

14

Group Practice Physician

Physician Services Exception (Stark)

Other exceptions requiring group practice (Stark)

Key elements:– Group must meet “group practice” requirements

– Compensation is: Fair market value

Not determined based on volume or value of referrals

Set in advance

– May pay for overall shares of DHS profits so long as not determined based on referrals of DHS

– Personally performed and “incident to” – NO ancillary

– “Five or more” Rule

Fair Market Value

FMV means “the compensation that would be included in a service agreement as a result of bona fide bargaining between well-informed parties to the agreement who are not otherwise in a position to generate business for the other party…”

Recent cases involving FMV: Tuomey, Halifax

Page 15: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

15

Compensation Models

Straight salary

Production-based

Quality-based

Efficiency/shared savings

Combination

Suggested Terms

Services– Specify different types of services – clinical,

administrative, call

– Assignment of right to bill and collect for services/right to contract with payors

– Schedule

– Location(s)

– Moonlighting/outside services

Page 16: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

16

Suggested Terms

Performance Standards– Compliance with other requirements (applicable laws,

facility governing documents)

– Record-keeping

– Professionalism

Suggested Terms

Compensation– Base compensation

– Specified service compensation (e.g., call shift, medical director fees, etc.)

– Bonus/incentive compensation

Page 17: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

17

Suggested Terms

Benefits/Expenses– Malpractice (consider tail coverage)

– Insurance

– Retirement

– License fees

– CME

– Phone

– Professional expenses

Suggested Terms

Term and Termination– Initial term and renewal term(s) – automatic renewal?

– Without cause

– With cause – curable breaches and immediate termination

– Effect of termination on other provisions

Page 18: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

18

Suggested Terms

Restrictive Covenants– Consider arrangement/relationship with physician

– Consider reasonableness

– Look to state law

501(c)(3) Entities

Private inurement: to qualify for tax exempt status, no part of the organization’s net earnings shall inure in whole or in part to the benefit of private individuals– Applies to those with the power to exercise control or

influence over the organization

– May apply to physicians

Payments not in excess of FMV

Page 19: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

19

501(c)(3) Entities

IRS Definition of FMV:– Price expressed as price at which property would

change hands between a hypothetical willing and able buyer and hypothetical willing and able seller acting at arms’ length in an open and unrestricted market when neither is under compulsion to buy or sell and when both parties have reasonable knowledge of relevant facts

– Reasonable compensation is the amount that would ordinarily be paid for like services by like enterprises under like circumstances

501(c)(3) Entities

Penalties– Loss of exempt status

– Intermediate sanctions

Page 20: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

20

Additional Holland & Hart Resources Healthcare Update and Health Law Blog

– Under “Publications” at www.hollandhart.com.

– www.hhhealthlawblog.com

– E-mail me at [email protected]

Future Webinars– June 12 – Recruiting Physicians and Other Practitioners

– June 26 – FDA and Medical Devices

– July 10 – Pharmacy, Prescription, and Controlled Substance Laws

Additional Holland & Hart Resources

Past webinars covering related topics available through the Health Law Blog:– Stark

– Anti-Kickback Statute

– Civil Monetary Penalties laws

Page 21: Physician Compensation: Regulatory and Business Concerns

5/28/2014

21

Questions?

Kelly S. McIntosh

Holland & Hart LLP5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor

Reno, Nevada 89511(775) 327-3004

[email protected]