piping engineeringmanilalam

Upload: dinesh-kumar-jd

Post on 04-Jun-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    1/62

    Piping Engineering

    Manilal A M

    Assist. Prof. in Chemical Engineering

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    2/62

    Contents

    Scope Of Piping Engineering

    Pipe Sizing Techniques

    Mechanical Design Of Pipes Codes and Standards

    Piping Elements

    Stress Analysis of Piping Systems

    7/17/2013 2

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    3/62

    Various Stresses in Pipes

    Pipe Support Selection and Design

    Stress Analysis of Piping Systems

    Expansion Joints

    Jacketed Piping

    Basics of Piping Drawings

    Plot Plan Fundamentals

    Equipment and Piping Layout

    Dynamic Analysis of Pipes

    7/17/2013 3

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    4/62

    Scope Of Piping Engineering

    Life of a Chemical Process

    Knowledge Base Required Chemical Engineering

    Mechanical Engineering

    Metallurgical Engineering

    Civil Engineering

    7/17/2013 4

    CommissioningConcept Beyond

    Piping

    Engineering

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    5/62

    Major Phases

    Techno-Economic Feasibility

    Design Phase

    Construction Phase

    Commissioning Phase

    Operation/Production Phase

    7/17/2013 5

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    6/62

    Techno-Economic FeasibilityEconomics- guiding principle

    Risk factor and pollution considerationFor new plantsChemical Path FeasibilityThermodynamic feasibility

    Kinetic feasibilityReaction Path Synthesis Algorithms( Organic

    Synthesis)

    BFD

    Engineering/Technological FeasibilityBatch or Continuous or Combination of both

    Detailed processes involvedUnit operations

    Unit processes7/17/2013 6

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    7/62

    Process Synthesis

    BFD

    Decision on Unit Operations

    Choices of Equipment

    Plant Cost

    Operating Cost

    Scope of Optimization

    Cost Optimal Flow sheet Configuration

    Selection of other equipments

    Utilities

    7/17/2013 7

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    8/62

    End results

    7/17/2013 8

    Conceptual Design

    Equipments and their

    Capacities (Roughly)

    Capital cost and

    Operating Cost

    Raw material availability and Cost and

    Market prizes of products and by products

    Techno-Economically feasible process

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    9/62

    Design Phase

    Rigorous Engineering Calculations

    Essentially two components

    Process Design & Mechanical Design

    Process Design

    Operating Conditions Equipment Sizes

    Simulation Software

    Steady State Simulators

    Dynamic Simulators

    7/17/2013 9

    BFD PFD

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    10/62

    PFD

    Father drawing

    Instead of blocks symbols

    Max Possible information about the process

    Stream specifications Unique numbering, stream table

    Inspection and review of PFD

    7/17/2013 10

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    11/62

    Control System Synthesis and Design(CSSD)

    Control System Design

    System Identification

    Manipulated/Controlled variable selection

    Controller selection

    HAZOP

    Identify deviation from expected steady state

    Identify hazard

    Monitoring instruments

    Stand by

    Mitigation measures

    7/17/2013 11

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    12/62

    Many more to do with the PFD

    Hydraulic Calculations

    Pressure drop

    Compressible/ Incompressible

    Single Phase/ Multi phase

    Available correlations

    Pipe Sizing

    Operating Cost

    Capital cost

    Batch/ Semi batch

    Storage tanks

    7/17/2013 12

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    13/62

    P&ID

    7/17/2013 13

    PFD P&ID

    Stand-by

    Equipments

    StorageTanks

    Pipe Sizes

    Instrumentation

    &Control

    ValvesOther

    Fittings

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    14/62

    P&ID Is the Mother Drawing shows

    Relative elevations of equipments

    Number of Trays, feed tray location (Distillation

    Column)

    Cardinal Drawing for various section Stored and updated for the entire life cycle

    Basic drawing for

    subsequent equipment design

    Plant layout

    Piping layout

    Insulation calculations

    Bill of material (BOM)7/17/2013 14

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    15/62

    Bible for Piping Engineer

    Details of pipe lines

    Material of Construction

    Service

    Mechanical Design

    Pressure vessels

    Closures

    Flanges

    Gaskets Bolts

    Man holes and Hand holes

    Reinforcing pads7/17/2013 15

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    16/62

    Mechanical Design Stiffening rings

    Internally/Externally

    Tall vessels

    Wind loads

    Supports

    Seismic effects

    Eccentric loads

    Considering all these fabrication drawings are issued

    7/17/2013 16

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    17/62

    Piping (preliminary )

    Pipe wall thickness design

    Fix nominal diameter and schedule

    for first BoM for pipe length requirement

    Design Phase is Over

    7/17/2013 17

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    18/62

    Construction Phase

    Choice of Plant location Politico-socio-economic considerations

    Plant Layout

    Unit layout/ Equipment Layout Directly influence Piping layout

    Piping (veins and arteries)

    Routing

    Stress Analysis

    Supports7/17/2013 18

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    19/62

    Use of softwares

    Civil structures/ Foundations Software model of 3-D layout

    Has all the details

    BoM for pipes and piping elements Can monitor project implementation

    Can act as Complete database

    7/17/2013 19

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    20/62

    Commissioning

    Not at all a smooth affair Adhoc decisions need to be taken on field

    Fabrication errors

    Late or non delivery of items Design errors

    Steady state design

    Evolve a good start up policy using dynamicsimulators

    7/17/2013 20

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    21/62

    Normal Operation Phase

    Properly designedsmooth run

    Need debottlenecking

    Minor/major changes

    Installation of additional equipment

    Bypassing existing equipment

    7/17/2013 21

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    22/62

    PIPE HYDRAULICS & SIZING

    7/17/2013 22

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    23/62

    PIPING

    Pipe sections when joined with fittings, valves, and

    other mechanical equipment and properly

    supported by hangers and supports, are called

    piping.

    7/17/2013 23

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    24/62

    Why Pipe Sizing Is Important?

    30% of total cost of process plant

    Significant amount of operating cost

    Significant amount of maintenance cost

    7/17/2013 24

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    25/62

    Pipe Sizing involves

    Lots of experience

    Engineering foresight and judgment

    Not mere theory

    7/17/2013 25

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    26/62

    Pipe Sizing Procedures

    1. Velocity considerations

    2. Available pressure drop considerations

    3. Economic considerations

    Degree of difficulty: 3>2>1

    P calculation is an integral part of 2 & 3 For (1) it is needed to quantify energy requirements

    7/17/2013 26

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    27/62

    Pressure drop calculations

    Types of flow Phase

    Horizontal, Inclined

    Through straight run pipes/ complex routings

    Isothermal/ Non-isothermal

    Incompressible/ compressible

    Laminar/Turbulent

    7/17/2013 27

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    28/62

    BERNOULLIS EQUATION

    Statement of Law of Conservation of Energy

    Sum of the pressure head, velocity head and

    elevation head is constant everywhere along theflow path.

    7/17/2013 28

    22

    222

    12

    211

    Zg

    v

    g

    P

    Zg

    v

    g

    P

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    29/62

    g

    P

    1

    g

    P

    2

    g

    v

    2

    2

    1

    g

    v

    2

    2

    2

    1Z

    2Z

    Fig. 17/17/2013 29

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    30/62

    Frictional Pressure drop

    BE need to be modify Skin friction

    Form friction

    7/17/2013 30

    PZ

    g

    v

    g

    PZ

    g

    v

    g

    P

    22

    222

    12

    211

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    31/62

    Single Phase Pressure Drop Calculation Single Phase Flow

    Laminar Transient

    Turbulent

    Reynolds Number

    Re< 2000 - Laminar

    2000

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    32/62

    Alternate definitions

    G = linear mass velocity

    W = mass flow rate in lb/h,D = pipe ID in inches

    7/17/2013 32

    DGRe

    DWRe 31.6

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    33/62

    Darcys Equation

    7/17/2013 33

    gD

    vfP D

    2

    )( 2

    For turbulent flow region, use friction factor chart -

    ),(

    FactorFrictionsDarcy

    RoughnessPipeRff

    f

    eD

    D

    ratioDdifferentforRvsf eD )(

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    34/62

    Fanning's Equation

    7/17/2013 34

    gDvfP F

    2)4( 2

    FD

    F

    ff

    anningf

    4

    FactorFrictionsF

    Another friction factor used in pressure drop

    calculation is the Churchill friction factor

    CFD fff 84

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    35/62

    Be sure which chart you are using!!!

    Linear region of for Laminar flow

    7/17/2013 35

    eRvsf

    e

    C

    e

    F

    e

    D

    Rf

    Rf

    R

    f

    8

    16

    64

    M th ti l l ti

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    36/62

    Mathematical correlationsAll equations are based on

    7/17/2013 36

    )(FactorFrictionsDarcy Df

    3400000eRpipe,Smooth

    50000eRpipes,commercialRough

    21

    210

    126.1ln656.19

    108.56

    RegionTurbulent

    64

    RegionLaminar

    f

    Rf

    Rf

    Rf

    e

    e

    e

    D

    M h i l l i

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    37/62

    Mathematical correlations

    Blazius Equation, for fully developed flow

    7/17/2013 37

    21

    2.0

    25.0

    888.027.0

    1656.19

    ,3400000

    046,0

    3164.0

    fRD

    f

    flowturbulentdevelopingRwithpiperoughorsmoothfor

    Rf

    equationBlasiusAnother

    Rf

    e

    e

    e

    e

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    38/62

    Mathematical correlations

    Colebrook- White Equation

    7/17/2013 38

    mmpipesteelcommercial

    fR

    f

    pipessmoothFor

    fRdf

    De

    D

    DeD

    05.0

    51.2log2

    1

    51.2

    71.3log2

    1

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    39/62

    Roughness Factor

    7/17/2013 39

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    40/62

    Calculation of Actual Pressure Drop

    Use this in BE to get actual pressure drop

    If Piping contains valves and fitting Equivalent pipe length of fittings

    Equivalent pipe length for entrance and exit effect

    Add all these and use in BE

    Temp and Pressure Effects?

    7/17/2013 40

    lengthEffectivePcalculatedPfrictionalNet

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    41/62

    Over Design

    Recommend next higher size than calculated

    Design for 30%extra flow rate

    Design for 30% less pressure drop

    7/17/2013 41

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    42/62

    Two Phase Calculations

    Depend on flow regimes 7 flow regimes are identified

    Bakers procedure

    Bakers parameters

    7/17/2013 42

    P

    YX BandB

    5.0

    315.0

    )(

    16.2

    32

    )()(531

    vl

    vY

    l

    l

    l

    vlvlX

    A

    WB

    WWB

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    43/62

    7/17/2013 43

    dyne/cmliquid,oftensionSurface

    cPliquid,ofViscosity

    ,sec

    lb/ftdensity,Liquid

    lb/ftdensity,Vapourlb/hrate,flowLiquid

    lb/hrate,flowVapour

    2

    3

    3

    l

    l

    l

    v

    l

    v

    ftareationalcrossInternalA

    W

    W

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    44/62

    Flow regimes

    7/17/2013 44

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    45/62

    Bakers Chart

    7/17/2013 45

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    46/62

    Correlations for

    Lockhart Martinelli Method Lockhart Martinelli modulus (X)

    From fig obtain YL and YV

    7/17/2013 46

    P

    VL PPX /2

    twotheoflargestthetake

    )()(

    )()(

    LLLV

    LLLV

    PYP

    PYP

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    47/62

    7/17/2013 47

    Pi Si i

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    48/62

    Pipe Sizing

    Based on Velocity Considerations

    Simplest approach

    Liquid - 1-3 m/s

    Gases/Vapour - 10-30 m/s

    7/17/2013 48

    ocities)linear velRecomandedrate,Flow(fD

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    49/62

    Based on Available Pressure Drop

    Most involved/important method Sized to meet process requirement

    Acceptable maximum hydraulic pressure drop

    A minimum pipe size, which causes at the mostthis pressure drop is recommended

    Trial and error procedure

    7/17/2013 49

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    50/62

    Assume a commercial pipe size (NB)

    Fix the schedule number (pressure design decides it)

    Obtain the ID

    Calculate hydraulic P If P> acceptable level

    Take a higher pipe size and repeat the calculations

    Recommend, minimum pipe size meeting the Prequirement

    7/17/2013 50

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    51/62

    Situations demanding this method

    Suction pipe sizing for a pump Flow of volatile liquid through pipes

    Feed to distillation column

    Lines having control valves

    Lines from thermo-siphon reboiler

    7/17/2013 51

    Economic Pipe Sizing

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    52/62

    Economic Pipe Sizing

    Least Annual Cost Approach

    If the previous two constraints are not stringent

    Go for Economic pipe sizing

    Economics is governed by

    Capital cost

    Operating Cost

    Figures given below shows the Amortized cost,

    Annual operating cost and Total cost, each vs NPS

    7/17/2013 52

    Optimum Pipe Dia

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    53/62

    Optimum Pipe Dia

    The cost of unit length of run pipe of diameterD is calculated as

    Let F be the fraction of cost of accessories perunit length

    The Total Capital cost =

    Annualized Capital cost =Where AMis the amortization factor

    7/17/2013 53

    5.1353.0 XDCD

    DCF)1(

    DM CFA )1(

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    54/62

    If annual maintenance cost if a fraction G of

    the capital cost,

    Total pipe cost is

    Annualized capital + maintenance cost, CP,

    Operating Cost

    7/17/2013 54

    DM CFGA )1)((

    5.1)1)((353.0 XDFGAC MP

    E

    PYKWCF 0000542.0

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    55/62

    7/17/2013 55

    pumpingofcostAnnualC

    kW.h)(perpower,electricofcost

    yearperoperationofhoursefficiencypump

    lb/ftdensity,

    lb/h,rateflow

    psidrop,pressurehydraulic

    F

    3

    K

    YE

    W

    P

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    56/62

    The P can be calculated as

    So, the cost of moving the fluid per year is

    7/17/2013 56

    84.4

    16.084.1

    1325.0D

    WP

    ED

    YKWCF 284.4

    16.084.2

    2840000

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    57/62

    Total Annual cost of unit pipe length is

    So,

    7/17/2013 57

    ED

    YKW

    XDFGAC MT

    284.4

    16.084.2

    5.1

    2840000

    )1)((353.0

    0)dD

    dC

    @(Dofvalue

    asobtainedbecanCminimizeswhich

    T

    T

    Optimum

    Optimum

    D

    D

    On solving

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    58/62

    On solving

    Most of the quantities in the above expression

    are project specific.

    The expression is further simplified withrepresentative values of AM,G,F,E,X,Y and K

    as

    7/17/2013 58

    169.0

    337.0

    027.0479.0

    1

    0657.0

    FGA

    YKWD

    M

    opti

    027.0142.0479.0

    027.0142.0479.0

    276.0

    717.1

    SQD

    orSQD

    LAC

    LAC

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    59/62

    7/17/2013 59

    kWhK

    yearhY

    ftX

    E

    F

    G

    AM

    /$0218.0

    /7880

    /$32.1

    55.0

    75.6

    01.0

    143.0

    169.0

    D

    169.0

    D

    )01.0/(728.0F

    2196,0F

    factorsCorrection

    a

    Y

    i i i h l i l

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    60/62

    Given optimum Dia how to select commercial

    size?

    Concept of cross over diameter

    If, DLAC>DC DH

    If, DLAC

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    61/62

    But.

    It is an industrial practice to

    recommend a pipe of one size

    higher than what is arrived at by

    any of the above procedures.

    7/17/2013 61

  • 8/13/2019 Piping EngineeringManilalAM

    62/62

    Thank You