plan and tip prioritization process september 2015
TRANSCRIPT
Plan and TIP Prioritization Process
September 2015
Plan and TIP Prioritization Scoring ProcessThe OKI scoring process for evaluating Plan and TIP projects contains both quantitative and qualitative factors. Revisions are presented to enhance the process.
• Long term• Modal• Uses existing data for most factors• More general• Fewer categories• Generally capacity road and other
modal capital
• Near term• Modal• Uses existing data for
most factors• More detailed• More categories• Federally funded &/or
regionally significant
TIP
Timing and Purpose
• Apply to the 2040 Update scheduled for application in Nov./Dec. 2015) and OKI Board adoption in June 2016.
• Refine existing process.
• Apply to project scoring processes beginning in 2016.
• Incorporate performance measures to the extent possible.
TIP
ElementsMODAL score + ALL projects score = Total
MODAL Score (45 POINTS)•Roadway•Transit•Non-Highway Freight•Bike/Ped (New!)
ALL PROJECTS Score (60 POINTS)• recommended change to 55
TIPMODAL Score (45 POINTS) –
recommended change to 50•Roadway•Transit•Non-Highway Freight•Bike/Ped (New!)
ALL PROJECTS Score (55 POINTS)
Proposed Changes - ROADWAY
• Safety: Change ranges per hundred million VMT
• Change congestion measure from LOS to Travel Time Index (TTI)
TIP• Safety: Change ranges per
hundred million VMT• Change congestion measure
from LOS to Travel Time Index (TTI)
• Add IRI rating for pavement conditions
• Add sufficiency rating for bridges
Proposed Changes - ROADWAY
TIP
SAFETYCrash Rate (HMVMT)
Point Value
1000 + 5
750 - 1000 4
500 - 750 3
250 - 500 2
100- 250 1
0 - 100 0
Proposed Changes - ROADWAY
TIP
Existing CongestionTravel Time Index (TTI) Point Value
greater than 2.0 5
1.2 – 2.0 3
Less than 1.2 0
speed periodpeak
speedflow freeTTI
Proposed Changes - ROADWAY
TIP
Existing ConditionsPavement Condition IRI * Point
Value
Poor greater than 220 5
Fair 95 - 220 3
Good Less than 95 0
IRI* International Roughness Index is a relative measure of pavement surface condition
Proposed Changes - ROADWAY
TIP
Existing ConditionsBridge Condition
Sufficiency Rating *Point Value
Poor Less than 30 5
Fair 30 – 50 4
Moderate 50 - 80 3
Good >80 0
Sufficiency Rating* - the higher the number the better the bridge condition
Proposed Changes - TRANSIT
TIP• Add Existing Asset Physical
Condition - 5 points
Proposed Changes - FREIGHT
TIP• Add Existing Asset Physical
Condition - 5 points
Proposed Changes – Bike/Ped (New category)
TIP• Safety (5)• Impact on safety (5)• Facility type (10)• Feasibility (10)• Existing surface conditions (5)• Complete streets (10)• Status of project (5)
• Safety (10)• Impact on safety (5)• Facility type (20)• Feasibility (10)
Proposed Changes – ALL PROJECTS
TIP• Economic Vitality: Revise score to
be based on existing jobs within ½ mile buffer of the project area. An additional 5 bonus points earned for documented investment value or jobs created.
• Delete Existing Condition. Factor moved to each MODE.
Proposed Changes – ALL PROJECTS
TIPEconomic Vitality
Jobs within ½ mile
Point Value
5000 + 5
2500 - 5000 4
1000 - 2500 3
750 to 1000 2
500 to 750 1
0 to 500 0
Proposed Changes – ALL PROJECTS TIP
Proposed Changes – ALL PROJECTSUp to 5 bonus economic points
TIPInvestment BONUS
New investment in project area $M
Point Value
$20 + 5
$15 – $20 4
$10 - $15 3
$5 - $10 2
$1 - $5 1
Less than $1 0
Employment BONUS
New Jobs within ½ mile
Point Value
200 + 5
100- 200 4
75 - 100 3
50 – 75 2
25 - 50 1
0 - 25 0
OR
Proposed TIP Changes – ALL PROJECTS
• IntermodalProject requires new interactions or improved connections to score 5 points.
NEXT STEPS
Prioritization Committee reviews July 2015 Prioritization Committee approves August 2015 ICC approves September 2015 OKI Board approves September 2015