plan review example 3 - new jersey · 17. determining applicable design & performance standards...

25
REVIEW EXAMPLE 3 PLAN Armando Alfonso NJDEP Division of Water Quality SWMDR Training Day 2 October 31, 2019

Upload: others

Post on 13-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

REVIEWEXAMPLE 3

PLAN

Armando AlfonsoNJDEP Division of Water Quality

SWMDR Training Day 2October 31, 2019

Page 2: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Presentation Goals

• Review site plans and stormwater management report

• Identify any errors with the design• Suggest potential solutions

Goals

2

Page 3: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Dischargeo Water Quantity is required?

• Urban Redevelopment Areao Ground Water Recharge is required?

• Increase in Impervious Coverageo Water Quality is required?

Which standards are required?

3

Page 4: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Familiarize Yourself with the Site

• Important in determining the requirements

• Existing land cover

Where are the pre-construction conditions?

4

Page 5: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Pre-Development Site

5

Page 6: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Stormwater Management Report

Existing CoverageCoverage Item AreaParking Lot, Roof, Driveway 258 sfLawn 66,224 sf

Proposed CoverageCoverage Item AreaParking Lot, Roof, Driveway 37,064 sfLawn 29,418 sf

6

Page 7: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Post-Development Site

7

Page 8: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Dischargeo Water Quantity is required?

• Urban Redevelopment Areao Ground Water Recharge is required?

• Increase in Impervious Coverageo Water Quality is required?

Which standards are required?

8

Page 9: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Soil Logs

9

Page 10: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

WATER QUANTITY10

Page 11: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Engineer’s Claim

The discharges of the proposed stormwater management systems will result in no increases, as compared to the pre-construction condition, in the peak runoff rates of stormwater leaving the site for

the two, 10, and 100 year storm events and that the increased volume or change in timing of stormwater

runoff will not increase flood damage at or downstream of the site, therefore, the project meets

the water quantity standard.

11

Page 12: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Peak Flow Rates

Existing Condition

Drainage Area

2-Year Storm

10-Year Storm

100-Year Storm

EAST 0.40 cfs 0.82 cfs 1.66 cfsWEST 0.34 cfs 0.70 cfs 1.43 cfs

SOUTH 0.51 cfs 1.04 cfs 2.12 cfs

Drainage Area 2-Year Storm

10-Year Storm

100-Year Storm

DA-1 (EAST) 0.37 cfs 0.65 cfs 1.31 cfsDA-2 (SOUTH) 0.46cfs 0.79 cfs 1.42 cfs

Proposed Condition

12

Page 13: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Difference in Peak Discharges

1st Street Runoff Reduction Table – EAST vs. DA-1 (EAST)Storm EAST DA-1 (EAST) Difference in Peak Discharges

2-year 0.40 cfs 0.37 cfs -0.03 cfs (92.5%)

10-year 0.82 cfs 0.65 cfs -0.17 cfs (79.3%)100-year 1.66 cfs 1.31 cfs -0.35 cfs (78.9%)

Acorn Avenue Runoff Reduction Table – SOUTH vs. DA-2 (SOUTH)Storm SOUTH DA-2 (SOUTH) Difference in Peak Discharges2-year 0.51 cfs 0.46 cfs -0.05 cfs (90.2%)

10-year 1.04 cfs 0.79 cfs -0.25 cfs (76.0%)100-year 2.12 cfs 1.42 cfs -0.70 cfs (67.0%)

13

Page 14: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Curve Numbers

14

Page 15: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Volume

1st Street Volume Reduction Table – EAST vs. DA-1 (EAST)Storm EAST DA-1 (EAST) Difference in Volume2-year 2,581 cf 10,747 cf +8,166 cf

10-year 5,199 cf 18,316 cf +13,117 cf100-year 10,634 cf 33,182 cf + 22,548 cf

Acorn Avenue Volume Reduction Table – SOUTH vs. DA-2 (SOUTH)Storm SOUTH DA-2 (SOUTH) Difference in Volume2-year 3,310 cf 2,352 cf -958 cf

10-year 6,669 cf 4,011 cf -2,658 cf100-year 13,640 cf 7,273 cf -6,367 cf

15

Page 16: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

GROUNDWATER RECHARGE

16

Page 17: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Engineer’s Claim

Soil test pits were performed in the vicinity of each stormwater management basin. The soil logs show

that the existing soil is primarily clay, with low permeability. The clayey soils restrict groundwater

recharge. Therefore, groundwater recharge has not been provided for this project.

17

Page 18: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards

• Stormwater Control Ordinance for Municipality• Amount of Disturbance• Tidal Water Body Dischargeo Water Quantity is required?

• HSG D Soilso Ground Water Recharge is required?

• Increase in Impervious Coverageo Water Quality is required?

Which standards are required?

18

Page 19: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

WATER QUALITY19

Page 20: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Proposed Condition

20

Page 21: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Stormwater Management Basin Detail

21

Page 22: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Forebay?

22

Page 23: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth)

23

Page 24: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Hazards

24

Page 25: Plan Review Example 3 - New Jersey · 17. Determining Applicable Design & Performance Standards ... Forebay? 22. Sand Filter Detail (In-Depth) 23. Hazards 24. Plan Review Example

Plan Review Example 3

25

Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlDivision of Water Quality401 East State StreetPO Box 420, Mail Code 401-2BTrenton, NJ 08625-420Tel: 609-633-7021www.njstormwater.org

Armando [email protected]