pm continuous monitor comparability assessment · cont. reads lower cont. reads higher winter...

17
0 8 16 24 32 40 0 6 12 18 24 30 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017 -8 -4 0 4 8 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.5 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 y = 0.60x + 0.19 R = 0.78 1:1 line Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A R S F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter, R=Spring, S=Summer, F=Fall W R S F 5 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter, R=Spring, S=Summer, F=Fall Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio (Cont/FRM) AllData 331 7.7 4.8 0.62 Winter 87 9.0 4.3 0.48 Spring 78 6.4 4.5 0.71 Summer 79 7.8 6.2 0.79 Fall 87 7.5 4.3 0.58 2015 112 8.4 5.7 0.67 2016 104 7.0 4.1 0.58 2017 115 7.7 4.6 0.60 Dataset N Bias N Bias (all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3) AllData 331 -38 211 -30 Winter 87 -48 51 -44 Spring 78 -33 46 -21 Summer 79 -27 62 -20 Fall 87 -43 52 -35 2015 112 -34 78 -27 2016 104 -42 62 -31 2017 115 -40 71 -32 PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment 2.5 Site 39-093-3002: Sheffield, OH FRM: Thermo Electron Model RAAS2.5-300 Sequential w/VSCC - Gravimetric (155,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1 Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3 Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018 Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m 3 ) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m 3 ) Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x) Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m 3 ) Appendix A Statistics

Upload: others

Post on 07-Aug-2020

6 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

8

16

24

32

40

0 6 12 18 24 30-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.60x + 0.19R = 0.78

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AR

S

F 567

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

WR

S

F5

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 331 7.7 4.8 0.62

Winter 87 9.0 4.3 0.48

Spring 78 6.4 4.5 0.71

Summer 79 7.8 6.2 0.79

Fall 87 7.5 4.3 0.58

2015 112 8.4 5.7 0.67

2016 104 7.0 4.1 0.58

2017 115 7.7 4.6 0.60

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 331 -38 211 -30

Winter 87 -48 51 -44

Spring 78 -33 46 -21

Summer 79 -27 62 -20

Fall 87 -43 52 -35

2015 112 -34 78 -27

2016 104 -42 62 -31

2017 115 -40 71 -32

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-093-3002: Sheffield, OH

FRM: Thermo Electron Model RAAS2.5-300 Sequential w/VSCC - Gravimetric (155,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 2: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 6 12 18 24 30-10

-7

-4

-1

2

5

05/15/2016 11/29/2016 06/15/2017 12/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.97x + 1.28R = 0.89

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWR

SF6 7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

WR

S

F

6

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 159 8.6 9.7 1.12

Winter 26 10.0 10.5 1.04

Spring 43 7.0 8.5 1.22

Summer 42 9.1 10.8 1.18

Fall 48 9.0 9.2 1.02

2015 0 . . .

2016 59 8.8 8.6 0.98

2017 100 8.6 10.3 1.20

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 159 14.6 149 15.2

Winter 26 8.4 26 8.4

Spring 43 25.2 39 23.2

Summer 42 18.8 41 20.8

Fall 48 4.7 43 6.6

2015 0 . . .

2016 59 -0.9 55 1.4

2017 100 23.7 94 23.2

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-151-0020: Canton, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142,116), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Thermo Scientific Model 5030 SHARP w/VSCC - Beta Attenuation (184), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 3: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 6 12 18 24 30-10

-2

6

14

22

30

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 1.00x + 1.89R = 0.79

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AW

RS

F

5

6 7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

W

F

5

6

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 321 7.5 9.4 1.25

Winter 77 8.6 10.5 1.22

Spring 83 6.5 8.5 1.31

Summer 79 7.8 9.9 1.27

Fall 82 7.3 8.8 1.21

2015 110 7.6 12.1 1.59

2016 101 7.1 7.6 1.07

2017 110 7.8 8.3 1.07

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 321 35.0 281 29.9

Winter 77 34.7 69 29.3

Spring 83 35.5 69 34.4

Summer 79 34.8 74 29.7

Fall 82 35.1 69 26.5

2015 110 77.8 98 68.3

2016 101 13.7 89 8.2

2017 110 11.8 94 10.5

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-103-0004: Not in a City, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC - Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 4: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

8

16

24

32

40

0 6 12 18 24 30-5

-2

1

4

7

10

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 1.10x + 0.95R = 0.94

Reg line1:1 line

N=347

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWR

S

F 56

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

AWRS

F

567

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 347 8.7 10.5 1.21

Winter 90 9.2 11.5 1.26

Spring 84 7.7 9.8 1.28

Summer 87 9.0 9.5 1.05

Fall 86 8.7 11.0 1.26

2015 116 9.1 11.3 1.24

2016 116 8.7 10.7 1.23

2017 115 8.2 9.5 1.15

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 347 24.9 330 24.7

Winter 90 29.1 86 31.1

Spring 84 33.4 79 31.2

Summer 87 4.5 84 7.1

Fall 86 33.1 81 29.7

2015 116 29.1 112 27.2

2016 116 28.8 113 28.1

2017 115 16.9 105 18.3

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-061-0010: Cleves, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (120,142), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1,4Cont: Met-One BAM W/PM2.5 VSCC - Beta Attenuation (733), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: July 17, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicative (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean Concentration ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 5: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 8 16 24 32 40-5

-1

3

7

11

15

01/03/2015 12/23/2015 12/11/2016 11/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 1.07x + 1.38R = 0.91

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

A

W

R

S

F

56

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

W

R

S F5

6

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 333 9.1 11.1 1.22

Winter 81 9.8 12.6 1.28

Spring 85 8.0 10.7 1.35

Summer 88 10.0 11.2 1.12

Fall 79 8.6 9.8 1.14

2015 110 10.3 14.3 1.40

2016 116 8.6 10.4 1.20

2017 107 8.4 8.5 1.01

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 333 28.6 312 27.1

Winter 81 42.5 75 35.2

Spring 85 39.7 79 42.7

Summer 88 11.4 86 11.6

Fall 79 21.5 72 20.1

2015 110 50.2 109 49.6

2016 116 30.4 107 25.2

2017 107 4.4 96 3.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-153-0017: Akron, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC - Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: January 25, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 6: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 10 20 30 40 50-25

-18

-11

-4

3

10

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.45x + 4.49R = 0.72

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

RS

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

WR

S

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 305 9.2 8.6 0.94

Winter 72 11.6 8.1 0.70

Spring 56 7.8 8.6 1.10

Summer 85 8.6 9.5 1.10

Fall 92 8.9 8.3 0.94

2015 113 10.3 9.6 0.93

2016 73 9.2 8.0 0.87

2017 119 8.3 8.2 0.99

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 305 8.1 293 4.7

Winter 72 -13 69 -18

Spring 56 18.2 54 15.5

Summer 85 15.1 83 13.9

Fall 92 12.4 87 7.2

2015 113 6.0 110 3.9

2016 73 4.5 69 -1.6

2017 119 12.5 114 9.3

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-095-0024: Toledo, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 7: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

8

16

24

32

40

0 6 12 18 24 30-10

-6

-2

2

6

10

07/20/2015 05/03/2016 02/15/2017 11/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 1.13x + -1.68R = 0.92

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AW RSF 5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

W

R

S

F5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 269 9.6 9.2 0.96

Winter 55 9.8 8.9 0.90

Spring 56 8.4 8.5 1.01

Summer 76 10.3 10.3 1.00

Fall 82 9.8 9.1 0.93

2015 50 10.5 10.3 0.98

2016 118 9.6 9.7 1.01

2017 101 9.2 8.1 0.89

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 269 -9.9 225 -2.3

Winter 55 -17 44 -7.0

Spring 56 -1.3 50 0.8

Summer 76 -4.8 65 3.6

Fall 82 -16 66 -7.3

2015 50 -11 45 -4.4

2016 118 -4.0 104 1.8

2017 101 -16 76 -6.6

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-035-0060: Cleveland, OH

FRM: Thermo Scientific Dichot. Partisol-Plus Model 2025-D Seq - Gravimetric (179,145,), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC - Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: January 25, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 8: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 8 16 24 32 40-20

-14

-8

-2

4

10

01/09/2015 01/06/2016 01/02/2017 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.65x + 3.10R = 0.84

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWRSF 5

6 7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

WR

S 5

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 274 8.5 8.6 1.01

Winter 61 8.9 8.0 0.89

Spring 67 7.9 8.7 1.09

Summer 75 8.8 9.6 1.09

Fall 71 8.5 8.2 0.96

2015 63 10.5 10.0 0.95

2016 95 8.1 7.9 0.98

2017 116 7.9 8.5 1.08

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 274 13.6 251 7.6

Winter 61 7.8 55 -4.4

Spring 67 22.2 59 11.3

Summer 75 17.0 74 16.2

Fall 71 7.0 63 4.6

2015 63 5.1 61 1.0

2016 95 7.1 88 6.2

2017 116 23.6 102 12.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-099-0014: Youngstown, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 9: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 6 12 18 24 30-10

-7

-4

-1

2

5

10/24/2016 03/17/2017 08/08/2017 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.59x + 3.03R = 0.81

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

ARS

F67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

AW

RS

F7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 140 7.2 7.3 1.01

Winter 34 8.0 6.4 0.81

Spring 27 5.6 6.5 1.17

Summer 29 7.6 8.6 1.13

Fall 50 7.2 7.4 1.02

2015 0 . . .

2016 23 7.3 7.2 0.99

2017 117 7.2 7.3 1.02

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 140 17.8 123 6.1

Winter 34 -3.9 32 -8.7

Spring 27 27.8 22 14.8

Summer 29 18.7 27 15.5

Fall 50 26.7 42 6.8

2015 0 . . .

2016 23 31.2 20 2.3

2017 117 15.2 103 6.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-085-0007: Painesville, OH

FRM: Thermo Electron Model RAAS2.5-300 Sequential w/VSCC - Gravimetric (155,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 10: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 8 16 24 32 40-25

-17

-9

-1

7

15

01/01/2016 08/30/2016 04/29/2017 12/27/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.57x + 2.53R = 0.57

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWS

F

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 130 8.2 7.2 0.87

Winter 29 7.3 6.4 0.88

Spring 18 7.7 5.5 0.72

Summer 44 8.8 7.8 0.89

Fall 39 8.5 7.7 0.91

2015 0 . . .

2016 56 7.5 5.6 0.74

2017 74 8.7 8.4 0.96

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 130 -4.2 109 -0.2

Winter 29 -3.1 26 -3.9

Spring 18 -19 12 -9.1

Summer 44 -7.3 37 5.0

Fall 39 5.2 34 0.1

2015 0 . . .

2016 56 -14 38 -3.4

2017 74 3.3 71 1.5

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-155-0014: Warren, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 11: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

4

8

12

16

20

0 6 12 18 24 30-20

-15

-10

-5

0

5

02/05/2015 01/23/2016 01/09/2017 12/27/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.53x + 0.51R = 0.79

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AR S

56

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

W

R

S

5

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 175 8.2 4.8 0.59

Winter 40 9.6 4.1 0.43

Spring 44 7.5 4.9 0.65

Summer 45 8.1 6.1 0.75

Fall 46 7.7 4.2 0.55

2015 54 9.6 6.0 0.62

2016 60 7.5 4.3 0.57

2017 61 7.6 4.4 0.58

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 175 -40 123 -36

Winter 40 -56 27 -54

Spring 44 -34 31 -32

Summer 45 -27 37 -25

Fall 46 -44 28 -38

2015 54 -37 43 -34

2016 60 -40 38 -38

2017 61 -41 42 -37

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-003-0009: Lima, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: PM2.5 SCC w/No Correction Factor - TEOM Gravimetric 50 deg C (701), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 12: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

10

20

30

40

50

0 12 24 36 48 60-15

-9

-3

3

9

15

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.88x + 2.29R = 0.85

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AW R

SF 56

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

S

F

5

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 342 6.9 8.4 1.22

Winter 87 6.3 7.4 1.17

Spring 83 6.2 8.2 1.33

Summer 85 7.0 9.5 1.35

Fall 87 8.0 8.5 1.05

2015 117 7.3 9.8 1.36

2016 118 6.7 8.5 1.27

2017 107 6.7 6.6 0.99

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 342 29.5 312 25.9

Winter 87 24.4 80 21.0

Spring 83 44.1 74 36.4

Summer 85 37.6 79 36.5

Fall 87 12.9 79 10.3

2015 117 42.9 109 39.5

2016 118 37.3 110 32.5

2017 107 6.4 93 2.1

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-087-0012: Ironton, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,118,), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Andersen BAM w/PM2.5 VSCC - Beta Attenuation (753), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 13: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 6 12 18 24 30-5

-2

1

4

7

10

01/09/2015 01/06/2016 01/02/2017 12/30/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.95x + 0.97R = 0.90

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AW

RSF5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

A

W

R

S

F

5

6

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 292 7.8 8.4 1.08

Winter 59 8.9 9.2 1.03

Spring 81 7.0 7.5 1.08

Summer 90 7.9 8.2 1.04

Fall 62 7.5 8.8 1.18

2015 91 8.8 9.3 1.07

2016 109 7.4 7.8 1.05

2017 92 7.2 8.0 1.11

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 292 11.6 271 10.5

Winter 59 4.2 54 4.4

Spring 81 11.2 73 13.3

Summer 90 6.9 88 6.3

Fall 62 25.9 56 19.3

2015 91 10.7 87 6.7

2016 109 9.7 101 9.4

2017 92 14.6 83 15.9

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-135-1001: New Paris, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Andersen BAM w/PM2.5 SCC - Beta Attenuation (750), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 14: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 6 12 18 24 30-5

-2

1

4

7

10

01/03/2015 01/01/2016 12/29/2016 12/27/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 1.07x + 0.17R = 0.91

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWR

SF

5

6 7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

AW

R

S

F

5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 170 8.2 9.0 1.09

Winter 43 9.0 9.4 1.05

Spring 40 7.0 7.7 1.09

Summer 42 8.0 9.3 1.16

Fall 45 8.7 9.3 1.07

2015 57 8.4 9.1 1.09

2016 55 8.1 8.5 1.04

2017 58 8.1 9.2 1.14

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 170 9.2 154 9.7

Winter 43 5.0 39 5.9

Spring 40 12.0 35 10.9

Summer 42 13.8 41 14.4

Fall 45 6.6 39 7.7

2015 57 11.0 51 11.8

2016 55 3.2 52 4.8

2017 58 13.3 51 12.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-023-0005: Springfield, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Andersen BAM w/PM2.5 SCC - Beta Attenuation (750), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 15: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 8 16 24 32 40-10

-6

-2

2

6

10

01/03/2015 12/31/2015 12/27/2016 12/24/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.90x + 0.08R = 0.95

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AWRSF56 7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

AWR

SF

5

6

7

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 349 8.8 8.0 0.91

Winter 85 9.5 8.9 0.93

Spring 90 7.8 7.1 0.90

Summer 88 9.0 7.8 0.87

Fall 86 9.1 8.4 0.93

2015 116 9.5 8.9 0.94

2016 119 8.9 8.0 0.90

2017 114 8.2 7.2 0.88

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 349 -8.9 317 -7.9

Winter 85 -6.1 76 -5.3

Spring 90 -9.3 78 -6.4

Summer 88 -14 85 -13

Fall 86 -6.2 78 -6.1

2015 116 -4.8 109 -3.6

2016 119 -9.9 109 -8.6

2017 114 -12 99 -12

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-113-0038: Dayton, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Andersen BAM w/PM2.5 SCC - Beta Attenuation (750), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 16: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

8

16

24

32

40

0 8 16 24 32 40-10

-4

2

8

14

20

01/03/2015 01/02/2016 12/31/2016 12/30/2017

-8

-4

0

4

8

0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.3 1.50.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.97x + 3.75R = 0.78

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

A

WR

S

F567

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

W

S

F

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 331 9.3 12.8 1.38

Winter 81 9.1 15.8 1.73

Spring 83 8.7 11.6 1.34

Summer 86 9.8 9.8 1.00

Fall 81 9.6 14.3 1.49

2015 105 10.5 14.0 1.34

2016 109 8.8 12.1 1.38

2017 117 8.8 12.4 1.41

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 331 56.6 307 51.0

Winter 81 97.5 77 89.4

Spring 83 58.7 75 43.2

Summer 86 3.9 80 9.3

Fall 81 69.7 75 63.8

2015 105 50.6 100 51.1

2016 109 56.5 98 47.8

2017 117 62.1 109 53.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-081-0017: Steubenville, OH

FRM: R & P Model 2025 PM-2.5 Sequential Air Sampler w/VSCC - Gravimetric (145,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Met One BAM-1020 Mass Monitor w/VSCC - Beta Attenuation (170), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics

Page 17: PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment · Cont. Reads Lower Cont. Reads Higher Winter Spring Summer Fall A W S R F 5 6 7 A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017 W=Winter,R=Spring,S=Summer,F=Fall

0

6

12

18

24

30

0 6 12 18 24 30-10

-6

-2

2

6

10

01/18/2015 01/11/2016 01/03/2017 12/27/2017

-5

0

5

0.7 0.9 1.1 1.30.80

0.85

0.90

0.95

1.00

0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

y = 0.99x + 0.31R = 0.90

1:1 line

Cont. Reads Lower

Cont. Reads Higher

Winter Spring Summer Fall

AW

RS

F5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter,R=Spring, S=Summer,F=Fall

AW

RS

F5

67

A=AllData, 5=2015, 6=2016, 7=2017W=Winter, R=Spring,S=Summer, F=Fall

Dataset N FRM Cont Ratio(Cont/FRM)

AllData 160 7.7 8.0 1.03

Winter 43 8.5 8.7 1.03

Spring 39 7.2 7.6 1.06

Summer 33 8.1 8.6 1.06

Fall 45 7.2 7.1 0.99

2015 52 8.3 9.2 1.11

2016 53 7.7 7.2 0.94

2017 55 7.2 7.5 1.04

Dataset N Bias N Bias(all observations) (only >= 3 ug/m^3)

AllData 160 3.3 140 9.2

Winter 43 2.5 38 8.3

Spring 39 5.3 36 11.1

Summer 33 7.9 31 11.5

Fall 45 -0.9 35 6.2

2015 52 15.5 48 17.0

2016 53 -6.8 46 -0.4

2017 55 1.6 46 10.8

PM Continuous Monitor Comparability Assessment2.5Site 39-057-0005: Yellow Springs, OH

FRM: BGI Models PQ200-VSCC or PQ200A-VSCC - Gravimetric (142,120), PM2.5 - Local Conditions (88101), POC=1Cont: Andersen BAM w/PM2.5 SCC - Beta Attenuation (750), Acceptable PM2.5 AQI & Speciation Mass (88502), POC=3

Data Source: EPA AQS Data Mart Generated on: March 2, 2018

Cont. (y) vs. FRM (x) PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Cont. minus FRM PM 2.5 ( g/m

3)

Additive (y) vs. Multiplicate (x) Bias R (y) vs. FRM CCV (x)

Mean PM 2.5 ( g/m3) Appendix A Statistics