points to ponder - our town, our kidsourtownourkids.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/jj... · points...

3
Points to Ponder Juvenile Justice Processes Points to Ponder offers questions, concerns, and other issues related to a main topic, usually offered in video format. Please consider these points to ponder as conversation starters and/or useful marks in your own critical evaluation of the material presented. As we consider juvenile justice processes, we often face crossroads between the past, the present, and the future. In so doing, we also face our own mirror – that is, we have an obligation to take a hard look at facts about our state. The attachment on the following page provides only a quick glance at juvenile justice in Kansas, including budget issues and responses outlined in Senate Bill 367, the juvenile justice reform legislation passed by the state of Kansas in 2016. The first line reads, “Despite considerable declines in its youth prison population, Kansas still incarcerates youth at a much higher rate than other states. . . .rank[ing] 5 th highest in the nation for committing and placing youth out of home.” § Ouch. Doubtless, the statement does not mean that Kansas does not care for its youth. But how did we get here? Why does Kansas rank so high in youth incarceration? § A closer look at the budget pie chart reveals the tiny sliver of youth services that go to prevention. This happens despite the fact that prevention is demonstrated to save money and reduce recidivism. Prior to reading this publication, did you realize these facts? Do you think most Kansas citizens are informed about these issues? § A critical reading of the document might raise still other questions: o Why is the cost of incarceration so high? (It takes almost $100,000 to incarcerate one Kansas youth for one year.) o Who pays? o What are the outcomes for kids? o Why is more revenue spent on incarceration than on community supervision? o Who makes these decisions, and why? o These numbers are for the entire state. Do various areas of the state contribute more or less to these categories, proportionally speaking? On the second page of the publication is a brief description of the state’s response to the need for juvenile justice reform, known as Senate Bill 367 (SB 367). OTOK has devoted another full segment to learning about SB 367, so be sure to check it out! The Snapshot: Juvenile Justice in Kansas document was produced by the organization Kansans United for Youth Justice (KUYJ), as supported by and the Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, a nonprofit organization. KUYJ is a grassroots coalition dedicated to decarceration of kids and investment in local, community-based programs and services. The document included here can be found at: https://www.kuyj.org/uploads/2/1/9/2/21929892/kuyj-two-pager-budget-and-reforms.pdf

Upload: others

Post on 09-Oct-2020

13 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Points to Ponder - Our Town, Our Kidsourtownourkids.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/JJ... · Points to Ponder Juvenile Justice Processes Points to Ponder offers questions, concerns,

Points to PonderJuvenile Justice Processes

Points to Ponder offers questions, concerns, and other issues related to a main topic, usually offered in video format. Please consider these points to ponder as conversation starters and/or useful marks in your own critical evaluation of the material presented.

As we consider juvenile justice processes, we often face crossroads between the past, the present, and the future. In so doing, we also face our own mirror – that is, we have an obligation to take a hard look at facts about our state. The attachment on the following page provides only a quick glance at juvenile justice in Kansas, including budget issues and responses outlined in Senate Bill 367, the juvenile justice reform legislation passed by the state of Kansas in 2016.

The first line reads, “Despite considerable declines in its youth prison population, Kansas still incarcerates youth at a much higher rate than other states. . . .rank[ing] 5th highest in the nation for committing and placing youth out of home.”

§ Ouch. Doubtless, the statement does not mean that Kansas does not care for its youth. But how didwe get here? Why does Kansas rank so high in youth incarceration?

§ A closer look at the budget pie chart reveals the tiny sliver of youth services that go to prevention.This happens despite the fact that prevention is demonstrated to save money and reduce recidivism.Prior to reading this publication, did you realize these facts? Do you think most Kansas citizens areinformed about these issues?

§ A critical reading of the document might raise still other questions:o Why is the cost of incarceration so high? (It takes almost $100,000 to incarcerate one Kansas youth

for one year.)o Who pays?o What are the outcomes for kids?o Why is more revenue spent on incarceration than on community supervision?o Who makes these decisions, and why?o These numbers are for the entire state. Do various areas of the state contribute more or less to

these categories, proportionally speaking?

On the second page of the publication is a brief description of the state’s response to the need for juvenile justice reform, known as Senate Bill 367 (SB 367). OTOK has devoted another full segment to learning about SB 367, so be sure to check it out!

The Snapshot: Juvenile Justice in Kansas document was produced by the organization Kansans United for Youth Justice (KUYJ), as supported by and the Kansas Appleseed Center for Law and Justice, a nonprofit organization. KUYJ is a grassroots coalition dedicated to decarceration of kids and investment in local, community-based programs and services.

The document included here can be found at: https://www.kuyj.org/uploads/2/1/9/2/21929892/kuyj-two-pager-budget-and-reforms.pdf

Page 2: Points to Ponder - Our Town, Our Kidsourtownourkids.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/JJ... · Points to Ponder Juvenile Justice Processes Points to Ponder offers questions, concerns,

Snapshot: Juvenile Justice in Kansas

Despite considerable declines in its youth prison population, Kansas still incarcerates youth at a much higher rate than other states. According to the most recent data available, the state ranked 5th highest in the nation for committing and placing youth out of home.1 On June 30th 2016, 953 youth were in the custody of the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC).2

That policy choice is costing the state millions of dollars each year and providing little in return. Kansas spends $7 out of every $10 of its juvenile services dollars incarcerating kids, yet more than 40 percent of youth released from youth prisons are reincarcerated within three years3 and less than half of those in other, non-secure facilities are successfully discharged from programming.4 In contrast, Kansas spends approximately three percent of its budget on community-based prevention or rehabilitation programs despite the fact that research has shown that proven alternatives to incarceration reduce recidivism by 20 percent on average and save $2 to $10 for every $1 invested.5

KDOC Youth Services 2016 Budget and Outcomes

Sources: Kansas Department of Corrections Annual Report FY2016; Kansas Department of Corrections (January 2015). “Cost Study of Youth Residential Centers for Juvenile Offenders: Pursuant to Senate Substitute for House Bill 2588”.

COMMUNITY SUPERVISION $18,759,819

PREVENTION $1,505,433

JCFs $25,084,106

YRCIIs $11,638,242

OTHER OUT OF HOME

$9,665,582

l Saves $2-$10 for every $1l Reduces recidivism 20% on average

l Cost $309/dayl 1 in 3 are only misdemeanantsl 42% reincarcerated within 3 yrs

l Cost $132/dayl 54% discharged unsuccessfullyl 51% of those discharged still in

placement 6 months later

Community-based alternatives, particularly family-based intervention programs, generally produce better outcomes than incarceration at significantly less cost. Programs like Functional Family Therapy and Life Skills Training help hold kids accountable in their home communities and could save Kansas $13-$25 dollars for every $1 invested.6

Page 3: Points to Ponder - Our Town, Our Kidsourtownourkids.org/sites/default/files/2019-06/JJ... · Points to Ponder Juvenile Justice Processes Points to Ponder offers questions, concerns,

SB 367 Juvenile Justice ReformsIn 2015, the Kansas Juvenile Justice Workgroup was created and tasked with developing policy recommendations to reduce juvenile justice system costs and improve outcomes for system-involved youth. The resulting legislation, SB 367, enacted in April 2016, encompasses a number of reforms, including: implementing a statewide system of structured, graduated responses for probation violations; expanding targeted services and interventions; focusing out-of-home placement on high risk youth; defining time frames for case lengths; increasing evidence-based programs in the community; and establishing a Juvenile Justice Improvement Fund to ensure that costs averted from out-of-home placement are shifted to community-based services.

Some provisions in the law went into effect in July 2016 while others will be phased in over a period of time through 2019. If fully enacted, the legislation is expected to reduce the number of youth sent to out-of-home placements by about 60% between 2016 and 2021.7

Though it is still early to measure success, Kansas has expanded evidence-based community alternatives to incarceration for youth.8 In 2016, targeted community-based treatment for sex offenses was implemented statewide. As of February 2017, Functional Family Therapy was offered in every county in the state and the DOC is piloting Multi-systemic Therapy and Youth Advocate Programs in specific counties.9 In addition, Kansas saw a decline in the youth custody population of more than 40 percent between January 2016 and January 2017.10

1. Sickmund, M., Sladky, T.J., Kang, W., and Puzzanchera, C. (2015). “Easy Access to the Census of Juveniles in Residential Placement. Online.” Available: https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/ezacjrp/.

2. Kansas Department of Corrections 2016 Report https://www.doc.ks.gov/publications/Reports/2016. This includes 734 youth in the custody population (out of home placements, foster care, home treatment, psychiatric residential treatment center, YRCIIs) and 219 held in juvenile correctional facilities.

3. Council of State Governments (March, 2015). “Reducing Recidivism for Youth in the Juvenile Services Division of the Kansas Department of Corrections: Analyses and Recommendations.”

4. Kansas Department of Corrections “Cost Study of Youth Residential Centers for Juvenile Offenders – Pursuant to Senate Substitute for House Bill 2588” January 2015. The analysis focuses on Youth Residential Center II facilities which are non-secure residential facilities for youth.

5. Colorado Department of Public Safety (2008). “What Works: Effective Recidivism Reduction and Risk-Focused Prevention Programs: A Compendium of Evidence-Based Options for Preventing New and Persistent Criminal Behavior”; Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2004). “Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth”

6. Washington State Institute for Public Policy (2004). “Benefits and Costs of Prevention and Early Intervention Programs for Youth”

7. https://www.doc.ks.gov/newsroom/releases/archive/2016/SB_367

8. Communication from the Kansas Department of Corrections, December 2016.

9. Ibid.

10. Kansas Department of Corrections (January 2017). “Statewide Month End Population: Placements for Youth in the Custody of DOC on the Last Day of Each Month. http://www.doc.ks.gov/publications/juvenile/population/custody/view